Next Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Mix Design Framework for Solid-Waste-Based Self-Compacting Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
The Development and Performance of a Novel Switchable Shading Device
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Genes in the Historic Centre of Macao: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

1
School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
Institute of Urban and Sustainable Development, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(8), 1517; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081517
Submission received: 10 February 2026 / Revised: 31 March 2026 / Accepted: 6 April 2026 / Published: 13 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)

Abstract

Under the dual pressures of urbanization and tourism development, the Historic Centre of Macao, as a World Cultural Heritage site, faces challenges including the inadequate transmission of cultural elements and the excessive commercialisation of tourism development. To systematically identify and safeguard its cultural characteristics, this study introduces the theory of cultural genes, constructing a dual-strand identification model encompassing both tangible and intangible cultural genes. This model integrates architectural function, structure, and ornamentation, alongside indigenous religions, arts, and folklore, thereby achieving a comprehensive extraction of cultural elements. Building upon this foundation, the study employed the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to quantitatively assess the degree of identification with various cultural elements, integrating perspectives from three distinct groups: tourists, residents, and third-party experts. The findings revealed significant disparities in cultural identification across these groups. For instance, residents demonstrated the highest level of identification with beliefs and folk customs, whilst tourists favoured more tangible aspects such as decorative elements and cuisine, exhibiting generally weaker identification with architectural structures. The findings demonstrate that this study, through the establishment of a systematic framework for identifying cultural genes and a multi-stakeholder evaluation system, has accurately discerned the characteristics of various cultural genes and the public’s level of identification with them. This provides a scientific basis for evidence-based, differentiated, and precise governance of the Historic Centre of Macao, offering significant reference value for the conservation and revitalisation of similar cultural heritage sites.
Keywords: Historic Centre of Macao; cultural genes; architectural heritage; AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method; cultural identity Historic Centre of Macao; cultural genes; architectural heritage; AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method; cultural identity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ge, Y.; Wei, K.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, R. Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Genes in the Historic Centre of Macao: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. Buildings 2026, 16, 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081517

AMA Style

Ge Y, Wei K, Wang Z, Huang Y, Zhu R. Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Genes in the Historic Centre of Macao: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. Buildings. 2026; 16(8):1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ge, Yifan, Kexin Wei, Ziyang Wang, Yuhao Huang, and Rong Zhu. 2026. "Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Genes in the Historic Centre of Macao: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective" Buildings 16, no. 8: 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081517

APA Style

Ge, Y., Wei, K., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., & Zhu, R. (2026). Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Genes in the Historic Centre of Macao: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. Buildings, 16(8), 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop