Next Article in Journal
Performance Evaluation of ENVI-Met in Simulating Microclimates Beneath Elevated Buildings in Cold Climates
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Dynamic Response Assessment of CLT Wall Structure Systems in Wind-Only and Sequential Seismic–Wind Scenarios
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

How Can Crowd Perception Methodologies Be Employed to Understand the Locality Characteristics of Small Towns Within the Jiangnan Water Network? From the Perspective of Urban–Rural–Wildland Integration

1
College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2
Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(6), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061214
Submission received: 15 January 2026 / Revised: 12 February 2026 / Accepted: 22 February 2026 / Published: 19 March 2026

Abstract

Serving as a link between cities and villages, small towns play a crucial role in reducing the disparity between urban and rural areas. The spaces of small towns in Southern Jiangsu Province not only showcase the landscape style of production–living–ecological but also embody local cultural characteristics, acting as a unique “container” for preserving the memory of Jiangnan water towns. However, during the urbanization process, these spaces often fail to respect the principles of landscape locality, instead favoring standardization and efficient designs that overlook human perspectives on landscape perception and understanding. This results in the “homogenization” and “heterogenization” of Jiangnan small towns landscape spaces. As county urbanization shifts toward improving human environments, human-scale spatial perception has become key to localized planning. By combining street view photos with deep learning, the ‘2bulu’ dataset supports large-scale analysis of crowd perception and precise detection of spatial and landscape features. This study investigated the proportions of landscape elements in the small towns’ town–rural–wilderness of Wujiang District that play a direct role in shaping people’s perceived visual identity and sense of cultural resonance, assessed the spatial distribution of perceived landscape locality scores, and revealed the positive or negative correlations between the proportions of visual landscape elements and the sense of place. This study analyzed perceived landscape locality in Wujiang small towns based on crowd perception, exploring which town–rural–wilderness landscape elements are perceived as having local character, and highlighted the importance of preserving locality through integrated town–rural–wilderness landscape elements. The findings offer insights for quantitative measuring landscape locality perception and support planning of appropriate local landscapes in Jiangnan small towns.

1. Introduction

Locality refers to the natural and cultural characteristics that distinguish a place from others, formed through long-term human–land interactions [1]. Building upon this basic definition, locality should be understood not merely as a set of objective regional attributes, but as a relational and experiential construct emerging from continuous interactions between people and their environments. In humanistic geography, the concept of place emphasizes space endowed with meaning through lived experience, memory, and emotional attachment [2,3]. From this perspective, locality overlaps with the notion of sense of place, which highlights individuals’ subjective feelings of belonging, familiarity, and symbolic identification with specific settings. In environmental psychology, place identity has been conceptualized as a component of self-identity rooted in physical environments, reflecting the integration of beliefs, values, memories, and emotions associated with particular places [4,5]. Related concepts such as place attachment and place dependence further explain affective bonds and functional reliance on environmental resources [6,7]. Together, these perspectives suggest that locality integrates material spatial structures with socially constructed meanings. Rapid urbanization in China has intensified the fragmentation of natural habitats and the homogenization of townscapes, weakening landscape locality. The long-standing urban–rural dual structure, reinforced by institutional systems such as household registration and land management policies, has further deepened spatial segmentation [8]. Small towns serve as critical nodes connecting cities and rural areas, where urban, rural, and wilderness landscapes coexist and interact. However, existing studies largely focus on single-scale or single-type locality analysis [9], these studies have extended the analytical field of locality from a research standpoint, but the practical understanding and application of local landscape knowledge remain incomplete. In particular, small towns, as an important transition node between the city and the countryside, lack diverse research and discussion of its landscape locality. In practical terms, effective landscape locality planning requires not only neighborhood-scale character analysis and design, but also attention to regional spatial patterns to enhance the overall structure connection of urban, rural, and wilderness landscapes [10]. Therefore, relevant research lacks exploration of local characteristics across administrative boundaries.
In this study, locality is defined as a unique spatial understanding formed through people’s perception of the physical environment. It is not merely the objective presence of cultural or natural features, but the result of how individuals interpret and internalize these features in specific spatial contexts [11]. Subjective perception refers to individuals’ personal, emotional, and cognitive responses to the physical characteristics of street environments as they are experienced in situ or through visual representation. Previous studies have shown that the formation of locality originates from people’s visual scenes, and its association with local attachment can be found in visual images [12]. As an important carrier of visual scenes, the subjective perception and experience reflected in geotagged photographs provide a new perspective for describing urban and rural landscapes [13], i.e., the result of the perception of locality [14]. However, Research has also have predominantly focused on the identification of objective landscape patterns and the physical characterization of specific towns or regional settlement networks, with relatively fewer investigations addressing subjective perceptual dimensions [15,16], mainly focusing on the analysis of the spatial patterns of water network settlements in Jiangnan. This includes the morphological characteristics and structural order of town settlements in Jiangnan [17], the coupling relationship between settlements and the water network topography [18,19], and the analysis of the landscape and wind patterns of rural villages in Jiangnan [10]. However, the interaction mechanism between people and town landscape locality from a perceptual perspective remains insufficiently explored. Clarifying the relationship between subjective perception and spatial landscape distribution will help refine suitability-oriented planning goals in Wujiang [20].
Simultaneously, small towns in Southern Jiangsu are the most representative and cutting-edge types of towns in China’s developed regions [21], serving as prime examples of transformation driven by county urbanization [22,23]. In Wujiang’s small towns, rapid urbanization, industrial expansion, and hydrological changes in the Tai Lake Basin have fragmented the historic water-town fabric [24] and ecological system [25], disrupting habitat corridors and town–rural continuity, while tourism and development have further transformed their rich Jiangnan water-town heritage [26]. These small towns therefore need to place greater emphasis on local landscape planning that incorporates residents’ subjective perceptions and responses [27,28]. Therefore, more detailed and in-depth analyses and research are required to explore the adaptive representations and developmental characteristics of local landscapes from a subjective perspective.
In this study, “Urban–Rural–Wilderness” refers to a spatial continuum rather than an administrative category. It describes the gradual transition in morphology, land use, and landscape characteristics from urbanized town centers, through rural settlements, to less-developed wilderness areas. This continuum captures both functional interdependence and environmental variation, and is particularly relevant in regions such as Wujiang, where historic water towns coexist with expanding peri-urban industrial and agrarian landscapes. Wujiang’s small towns exhibit distinctive water-town morphology shaped by longterm human–water interactions. Key characteristics include: a hybrid town–rural condition (both urban and rural attributes coexist); a ‘field–woodland’ (farmland–tree belt) texture integrated into settlements; a dense water-network system formed by lakes, canals, and distributaries; river–lake coupling that organizes daily life and settlement layout; a ‘small bridges–flowing water–waterside households’ streetscape formed by bridges, canals, white-walled black-tiled dwellings, and waterside lanes; a small-scale, low-rise, medium-density built form; and an increasingly blurred boundary among town, countryside, and wilderness, where farmland and semi-natural spaces surround and permeate the town fabric (Figure 1). As carriers of local historical memory, Wujiang’s traditional water towns are increasingly intersecting with expanding industrial landscapes amid trends of regional and pan-urbanization. Reconciling perceived landscape conflicts while preserving the distinctive character of the Jiangnan water town has therefore become a critical task for the sustainable development of small towns in Wujiang District [15].
In summary, the locality of small towns in Wujiang is embodied in their water-town culture, traditional settlement morphology, and ecological structure. Amid urban–rural–wilderness integration, this locality faces risks of homogenization while also gaining opportunities for renewal through spatial reconstruction. Subjective perception serves as a bridge between people and place, shaping how locality is recognized and evaluated across interwoven urban, rural, and wild landscapes. To capture this perceptual dimension, this study employs streetscape big data and deep learning techniques, using the ResNet50 model to extract high-level semantic features from street-level images, thereby providing a robust foundation for analyzing how visual elements contribute to perceived locality. ResNet50 was selected for its strong balance between accuracy, computational efficiency, and feature representation capacity [29]. Its residual architecture enables stable training of deep networks and effective extraction of complex visual patterns. Moreover, it has been widely applied in urban scene recognition, streetscape analysis, and environmental perception modeling, demonstrating its robustness and reliability in related research contexts [30,31]. By referencing the results of dataset collection, evaluating perceptions based on locality, and statistically eliminating cognitive differences, the study forms the final locality score simulation results.
Because landscape perception is inherently formed at the human and street level—where individuals directly experience visual elements such as buildings, waterways, vegetation, and streetscapes—the micro scale serves as the most relevant unit for understanding perceptual responses and for implementing planning interventions. By integrating street-level visual analysis with regional spatial structures, the research provides fine-grained, perception-oriented planning guidance for small towns in Southern Jiangsu, strengthens the emotional connection between people and place, and supports a balanced approach to cultural heritage conservation and sustainable urban development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Wujiang District of Suzhou City is located in the southeast of Jiangsu Province, adjacent to Shanghai and Zhejiang Province, and west of Taihu Lake. The total area of the district is 1176.68 km2, of which the water area is 267.1 km2, accounting for 22.7% of the total area (excluding the water surface of Taihu Lake under its jurisdiction) [32,33]. Wujiang has a unique locational advantage, being both the geographical junction of Suzhou, Zhejiang, and Shanghai, and the center of the national strategy for the integrated development of the Yangtze River Delta region (Figure 2).
Its proximity to East Taihu Lake and the Beijing–Hangzhou Grand Canal has given rise to a dense network of intersecting rivers and numerous historic water towns rich in cultural heritage. This has given rise to the culture of water towns and ancient towns, the thousand-year-old canal culture, and the sericulture and silk culture [34]. Small towns in Wujiang are rooted in a dense natural water-system network where rivers and lakes interweave with fields and forests, and towns and villages are spatially interspersed. Over the long course of landscape evolution, they have developed distinctive characteristics of diversity, evolution, stability, inter-construction, order, and continuity [11], reflecting the region’s significant human–ecological value [15]. However, the contemporary pattern of multi-industry agglomeration has led to the coexistence of modern urban and rural vernacular atmospheres within each town, forming an intricately intertwined town–rural–wilderness spatial structure [35].
In Wujiang’s small-town landscapes, urban, rural, and wilderness spaces display distinct visual and compositional characteristics. Urban areas are dominated by buildings, roads, and intensive human activity, with dense street networks, complex facades, and limited sky visibility, forming highly artificial streetscapes. Rural spaces integrate built and natural elements, where trees, greenery, and low-density buildings create an open yet regionally distinctive semi-natural environment. Wilderness areas are characterized mainly by sky, water bodies, and natural vegetation. The contrasting proportions and combinations of these elements form the perceptual foundation of landscape locality in Wujiang.

2.2. Research Design

This study adopts an integrated research design that combines crowdsourced street-view imagery, subjective perception surveys, deep-learning–based visual analysis, and spatial mapping to investigate landscape locality across town–rural–wilderness spaces in small towns of Wujiang District. The overall research framework is structured as a multi-stage process, as illustrated in Figure 3, and serves as the methodological foundation for the subsequent subchapters.
First, crowd-sourced street-view images were collected along all accessible road networks in Wujiang District to ensure comprehensive spatial coverage. Based on their geographic locations, the images were classified into three spatial categories—town, rural, and wilderness—according to landuse boundaries and spatial characteristics. Images whose shooting coordinates fell within urban construction land were classified as town scenes, typically characterized by dense buildings and urban infrastructure. Rural images represented village-level settlements or peri-urban areas with mixed features of traditional housing, agricultural land, and fragmented greenery [36]. Wilderness images corresponded to ecological zones or extensive agricultural landscapes with low construction density and dominant natural elements such as water bodies, vegetation, and open sky. Second, to capture human subjective perception of landscape locality, a perception-based questionnaire experiment was conducted using a subset of random street-view images from each spatial category. Respondents were asked to evaluate the degree of perceived locality using a Likert-scale scoring system. These subjective evaluations provided perceptual labels reflecting emotional and cognitive responses to different landscape compositions [37]. The survey results formed the perceptual dataset used for subsequent model training and validation. Third, to objectively quantify environmental representations within the street-view images and reduce individual perceptual bias, a deep-learning–based visual analysis was applied. A Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), trained on an open-source semantic segmentation dataset, was employed to extract and quantify landscape elements such as buildings, water, vegetation, sky, and other visual components from all collected images [38,39]. In parallel, a pre-trained ResNet50-based model was fine-tuned using the questionnaire-derived perceptual scores to establish a mapping relationship between visual features and perceived landscape locality. Fourth, the trained models were applied to the full set of street-view images to generate continuous locality evaluation scores across the study area. These results were spatialized using geographic information systems ArcGIS 10.8 (Redlands, CA, USA), allowing the integration of perceptual scores with remote-sensing data and spatial attributes [40].
Finally, statistical correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between objectively extracted landscape elements and subjects’ perceived landscape locality. Based on the quantified proportions of 17 semantic landscape elements derived from street-view images, correlation analysis was applied to identify elements that positively or negatively influence locality perception. This step establishes an explicit analytical linkage between visual landscape composition and human subjective evaluation, allowing the study to move beyond spatial description toward mechanism-oriented interpretation [41].

2.2.1. Data Sources

Street view big data consists of non-professional crowd street view scene collection and shooting equipment, capturing personalized scenes according to the environment traversed by the crowd [42]. This results in street views that reflects the average human height and visual observation range, providing a true representation of human eye perspective and visual observation of different regions [37,43]. Additionally, the wide range, multi-view angles, and high precision of street views big data ensure the richness, objectivity, accuracy, and validity of the measurement results when classifying and analyzing material spatial representations based on this data [44,45,46].
“2bulu” is a Chinese geospatial platform that collects and shares user-generated GPS trajectory data, including geo-tagged photos captured along walking, cycling, and driving routes. These images reflect real street scenes from the perspective of ordinary users. With over 20 million registered users and more than 60 million trajectory records since its launch in 2008, the platform now covers more than 300 cities across China. Its longterm development, extensive spatial coverage, and large volume of geo-referenced walking data make it a reliable and representative source for analyzing human-scale environmental perception and landscape characteristics. 2bulu was selected as the primary data source because its trajectory-based structure enables continuous spatial representation of street-level environments. Each image contains precise GPS coordinates, altitude, and timestamps, allowing high-resolution spatiotemporal mapping and accurate linkage between visual content and landscape patterns. To complement the absence of explicit subjective evaluations in the image data, an online questionnaire was conducted to capture users’ perceived locality.
Following previous studies employing 2bulu data at multiple spatial scales, deep learning methods were applied to process street-view images. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were used to automatically identify and classify visual elements such as buildings, vegetation, and roads. By linking extracted visual features with geographic coordinates, the study reveals fine-grained spatial patterns of landscape perception and supports analysis of human–environment interaction at the street scale. The street views data used in this study consists of static map data of the passable roads in each town of Wujiang District, collected by the “2bulu” platform from January to December 2023. The total data volume is 2512, covering major county roads, township roads, village roads, etc., essentially achieving full coverage of the streets in small towns in Wujiang District. The resolution is 1280 × 960 dpi. On the “2bulu” website (https://www.2bulu.com/, accessed on 14 January 2026), the track filtering scope is limited to Wujiang, Suzhou, and the “walking” type is selected [43]. Python 3.9.12 (Beaverton, OR, USA) code was written to automatically obtain 949 GPS street views data in Wujiang. After filtering out irrelevant, abnormal, and duplicate data, 787 walking trajectories spanning 12 months in 2023 were selected as the final data.
The trajectories downloaded from “2bulu” are in “kml” format, objectively reflecting the behavioral and activity changes of the population. Since the data is voluntarily and openly uploaded by users, it is free from researcher or investigator interference and does not contain private personal information (Table 1).

2.2.2. Classification of Streetscape Elements Based on the Percentage of Street Views Labels

The objective environmental representation measure of streets, based on supervised learning and trajectory big data, primarily includes the semantic segmentation of street image features and the identification of constituent elements in street images. Semantic segmentation of street image features is mainly based on the image attributes of street data, such as color, material, size, etc., to extract relevant areas in the streetscape data and compute percentages and other values [44].
Using computer vision to simulate people’s observation of the street environment and the material environment representation information obtained, content recognition of environmental picture composition elements was performed on the 2512 2bulu road static trajectory images collected in Wujiang central city through a fully convolutional neural network with supervised learning(Figure 4). Based on a training set of street physical environment composition and open-source element recognition, the study identified a total of 17 types of elements with natural and artificial attributes in the street environment. These elements include sky, road, trees, buildings, vegetation, walls, grass, people, poles, windows, doors, cars, boats, bridges, fences, and signboards. The ratio of the pixel area covered by each of these 17 recognition elements to the total pixel area of the whole image was calculated.
Therefore, these landscape elements are categorized into urban, rural, and wilderness spaces. This classification reflects the fundamental structural and functional distinctions within Wujiang’s spatial landscape system. Urban spaces are primarily defined by built elements—such as buildings, roads, walls, windows, doors, vehicles, poles, fences, signboards, and pedestrian activity—which together form the physical framework of urbanized environments.Rural spaces, serving as transitional zones between urban centers and natural areas, comprise semi-natural elements including bridges, boats, trees, buildings, roads, and vegetation. These elements express the hybrid cultural–ecological characteristics of Jiangnan’s water-oriented settlements [45]. Wilderness spaces are dominated by minimally modified natural features, such as sky, wild vegetation, trees, and natural grass, representing areas with limited human intervention and strong ecological continuity.
Although certain elements (e.g., trees, vegetation) may appear across multiple spatial types due to their wide environmental distribution, the elements listed within each category represent the dominant and most characteristic features of Wujiang’s town, rural, and wilderness environments (Table 2). This classification is therefore both conceptually grounded—reflecting the spatial logic of urban–rural–wilderness—and empirically justified, as it aligns with the actual patterns of landscape element presence captured in street-view imagery across the district. As such, the categorization provides a valid analytical foundation for interpreting spatial differences in landscape composition and perception within Wujiang District.
On this basis, the overall distribution of the elements in the objective environment of the streets of Wujiang District was analyzed. The recognition data from valid track samples were input into SPSS 22 (Armonk, NY, USA) to calculate and analyze the frequency and mean values, discussing their influence on individuals’ subjective perception.

2.2.3. Evaluating the Locality of Wujiang’s Street Views Environment Using Online Questionnaires

Street images were randomly selected for each trajectory type as visual stimuli for locality evaluation. An online questionnaire was designed and edited through the website “Questionnaire Star” to assess the degree of locality perceived by people for each street image. The questionnaire consists of 37 questions, divided into sections on the personal information of the subjects and the photo scoring evaluation part, which includes 10 photo samples (original street-view photographs) of each of the three types of town, rural, and wilderness for the subjects to score. Conducting photo experiments with different objects will not affect the results of the experiment [45,46]. The remaining 7 questions are about the specific situation of personal information, including gender, age, educational level, occupation, place of origin, length of residence in Wujiang District, and perceived degree for local characteristics in urban and rural areas. This information was used to ensure respondent diversity and to support potential stratified analysis of perceptual differences.
Our questionnaire was completed by residents of Wujiang, and it also included questions about which specific town they were from within the district. Subjects were recruited online via WeChat App and asked to rate each street image on a five-level Likert scale, where 1 means “strongly disagree” and 5 means “strongly agree.” A total of 658 valid questionnaires were collected, and the overall reliability of the questionnaire results, analyzed by SPSS software, was 0.786, indicating that the results were generally credible.
Among the respondents, the ratio of men to women is 1:1.10; their age mainly focuses on 23–35 years old, accounting for 39.06%; their main education level is above bachelor’s degree, accounting for 28.42%; and their main occupation is enterprise workers, accounting for 39.97%.

2.2.4. Using the Pre-Trained Model to Derive Locality Evaluation Scores for All Photos

The pre-trained ResNet50 model was used as the base model, which was trained with the results of 658 real life questionnaire data, and a custom layer was added on top of it to meet the demands of the triple classification task. ResNet50 has deeper network depth and residual connectivity, which helps alleviate the problem of gradient vanishing and improves the model’s performance. ResNet50 was chosen as the base model because it has been pre-trained on large datasets such as ImageNet and can effectively extract generic image features. After calibration, the trained model was applied to all 2512 trajectory photographs collected in the study area. For each image, the network outputs Softmax probabilities for the three spatial categories (town, rural, and wilderness). These probabilities were then linked to geographic coordinates and used to generate the spatial distribution map of perceived landscape locality across Wujiang District.
Since the pre-trained ResNet50 (Figure 5) model is used for 1000-class image classification, a custom layer needs to be added to the top of the model to meet the scoring requirements. First, the feature map is compressed into a vector using the GlobalAveragePooling2D layer, then a fully connected layer with 1024 units and a ReLU activation function is added, and finally a fully connected layer with three units (corresponding to the three image classes) is added. The final layer, with a Softmax activation function, is used to output the probabilities of the three categories: town, rural, and wilderness.

2.2.5. Connecting Subjects’ Perceived Locality Scores with Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Streetscapes

Correlation analysis was used to establish the connection between street indicators and landscape locality [47]. The p-value from the significance test and the r-coefficient from Pearson correlation analysis reveal the degree of influence that different street indicators have on people’s perceived landscape locality, while the mechanisms underlying these influences can be examined more deeply through the positive and negative effects of each indicator [48]. To explore the connection between street-environment characteristics and locality perception, we calculated the pixel proportion of 17 recognized landscape elements in each image and correlated these quantitative variables with the perceived locality scores generated by the ResNet50 model. A Pearson correlation analysis was then conducted to determine the strength and direction of associations between landscape elements and locality perception, with all variables normalized beforehand to ensure comparability.
Using the spatial coordinates of the original images, the locality scores were further mapped onto the Wujiang District base map using ArcGIS 10.8 (Redlands, CA, USA) to visualize score distribution across the eight towns. This spatial visualization enabled the identification of clusters of high or low locality perception and allowed comparison with the spatial composition of street elements. In this study, the classification scores generated by the final Softmax layer of the ResNet50 model represent the probability distribution across three perceptual categories—town, rural, and wilderness—expressed as a three-dimensional output vector that can be interpreted in multiple ways.

3. Results

3.1. Proportion of Various Landscape Types in Small Towns of Wujiang District

Based on the pixel proportions derived from element identification, statistical analysis showed that in the street-view images of Wujiang District (Figure 6), four elements—sky, water surfaces, trees, and buildings—formed the primary group of observable physical-environment features. Together, these four elements accounted for 62.14% of all identified pixels. They can therefore be regarded as the dominant compositional elements of the street-view environment, as well as the primary objective environmental features visible to observers.
Among these first-level environmental elements, the sky had the highest proportion, with a pixel percentage of 24.62%. Trees, water, and buildings followed, with proportions of 17.54%, 10.37%, and 9.61%, respectively. Second-level elements in the street-view environment mainly included plants, roads, banisters, and grass, collectively accounting for 22.18% of all street-view image pixels. These categories had pixel percentages of 7.49%, 7.08%, 4.87%, and 2.74%, respectively. The remaining elements—people (0.17%), mountains (0.11%), windows (0.04%), doors (0.12%), cars (0.70%), banisters (0.77%), rocks (0.37%), labels (0.30%), sand and soil (0.09%), bridges (0.10%), streetlights (0.05%), and electric poles (0.27%)—together accounted for only 3.53% of the total pixel proportion in the street-view images (Table 3). We applied the natural breaks method to distinguish the above proportional intervals, which is commonly used in spatial analysis to identify natural groupings or clusters within data based on variance minimization within groups and maximization between groups. This method is particularly suitable when the data distribution is uneven or skewed, as it avoids arbitrary thresholds.
Based on the pixel proportions obtained from element identification, the 17 environmental elements exhibit the following characteristics in terms of their attributes and spatial distribution. First, the elements with the highest proportions in the street-view environment of Wujiang District are predominantly natural. Natural elements account for 63.33% of all identified pixels, making them the primary environmental features perceived by observers. Finally, the dominant landscape elements also exhibit intrinsic relationships in their spatial distribution. For example, enclosure walls in the second-level elements commonly appear together with first-level architectural elements, jointly forming the enclosure characteristics of the street environment. Similarly, water surfaces—one of the dominant first-level elements and a key carrier of Wujiang’s local landscape—are often associated with third-level elements such as boats and bridges. In addition, road elements (second-level) and sky elements (first-level) jointly shape the perceived openness of street spaces. Compared with the first two levels, third-level elements occupy only a small proportion of spatial distribution and environmental composition, functioning mainly as embellishments superimposed on the dominant elements. Despite their small proportion, these elements can play a decisive role in shaping environmental impressions—for instance, streetscapes containing boats may still be perceived as representative Jiangnan water-town environments regardless of surrounding building configurations.
From a comparative perspective across town, rural, and wilderness areas (Figure 7), Town areas exhibit higher proportions of built environment elements, including buildings, roads, and walls. Perceived locality scores in these areas are generally moderate, often due to urban homogenization and the diminished presence of historically or ecologically significant features. Locality perception in towns is primarily shaped by architectural detailing and the degree of spatial enclosure. Rural areas are characterized by a combination of artificial and natural elements—such as canals, trees, small-scale buildings, and cultivated vegetation. These areas demonstrate the greatest variability in perceived locality scores, largely influenced by how traditional and contemporary landscape features are visually integrated. As transitional zones, rural areas can have their locality perceptions substantially altered by even subtle compositional changes. Wilderness areas are predominantly composed of natural features, including water bodies, trees, grasslands, and open sky (Figure 8). These environments tend to receive higher locality scores, particularly where traditional elements—such as boats, arched bridges, or vernacular rural structures—remain visible. Perceptions of locality in these areas are closely associated with environmental openness and the continuity of historical landscape patterns.

3.2. Survey Results and Model-Based Locality Evaluation

A total of 658 valid questionnaires were collected from residents of Wujiang District, using original street-view photographs as visual stimuli to assess perceived landscape locality across town, rural, and wilderness environments. Survey results show clear perceptual differentiation among the three landscape types. Wilderness landscapes received the highest level of locality recognition (76.44%), followed by town spaces (65.50%) and rural spaces (43.77%), indicating that environments dominated by natural elements are more strongly associated with local identity.
In terms of photo-based scoring, townscape scenes generally obtained moderate locality scores (mostly 3.46–3.71), reflecting the effects of urban homogenization and standardized built forms. Rural landscapes exhibited higher but more variable scores (3.57–3.86), largely influenced by the visual integration of traditional settlements, farmland, canals, and vegetation. Wilderness scenes, characterized by water bodies, open space, and natural vegetation, consistently achieved high locality scores (3.61–3.89), highlighting their strong symbolic and perceptual connection to the Jiangnan water-town landscape.
Based on these questionnaire results, the trained ResNet50-based model was subsequently applied to all collected trajectory images, generating 2512 landscape locality evaluation scores across Wujiang District. Each image was classified into one of three spatial categories—town (0), rural (1), or wildland (2)—and assigned a corresponding locality score. The aggregated results indicate that wilderness images account for the highest proportion of high-locality scores, followed by rural images, while town images are more concentrated in the medium and low-score ranges. This overall distribution pattern is highly consistent with the questionnaire-based perception results, confirming the robustness of the model in extrapolating subjective locality perception from limited samples to a large-scale dataset. These 2512 locality scores form the quantitative basis for subsequent spatial hotspot analysis and correlation analysis between landscape elements and perceived locality.

3.3. Landscape Locality Evaluation Scores and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Wujiang District

The landscape locality evaluation score map of Wujiang District exhibits spatial hot and cold effects (Figure 9), based on kernel density estimation with an automatically determined bandwidth. The spatial distribution of hotspots is characterized by a multi-point aggregation pattern, with more pronounced hotspots appearing along the shoreline of East Taihu Lake and forming a relatively continuous linear spatial corridor. This indicates that the lakefront linear space is a more prominent area of landscape locality due to the natural shoreline and mountain features. Moving eastward along the Taipu River, the continuous hotspot zone transitions into a single-core hotspot pattern in towns such as Lili, Tongli, and Qidu. Additionally, Pingwang and Zhenze towns also exhibit high locality scores, forming a “point-line-point” spatial structure with the continuous linear space. The spatial arrangement of these hotspots aligns with the development axis of the townships. For example, in Zhenze Township, the riverfront linear zone corresponds to the continuous hotspot corridor.
The analysis of landscape locality scores and the composition of landscape elements across the eight towns of Wujiang District reveals clear spatial heterogeneity, with significant differences in both physical landscape structure and perceptual outcomes. Overall, rural and wilderness spaces receive higher locality evaluation scores compared to urbanized areas, as natural elements—such as rivers, canal networks, lake shorelines, farmland, and grasses—are more intuitively and visibly expressed in these environments. In contrast, large-scale urbanization has often resulted in the homogenization of townscapes, where distinctive architectural styles and spatial flows are diminished by generic design strategies that disregard local cultural heritage.
Towns like Pingwang, Zhenze, and Lili exhibit stronger connections to the traditional forms of Jiangnan water towns, featuring higher proportions of natural elements such as canals, bridges, boats, and riparian vegetation. These features contribute to consistently higher perceived locality scores. For example, in Pingwang, the integration of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal and Taipu River with the town’s layout creates a hybrid landscape of built and natural elements, reducing visual contradictions and enhancing local identity perception.
In contrast, towns such as Songling (now part of the Wujiang Development Zone) and Shengze, which have undergone rapid urbanization and industrial expansion, show a dominance of artificial landscape elements including roads, walls, buildings, and signboards. These areas tend to score lower in perceived locality, reflecting a diminished expression of regional character. However, the data also show that high building density does not inherently lead to low locality scores; it is the spatial composition and integration of natural features that matter more. For instance, although Pingwang’s town center is built-up, the surrounding water-linked rural zones maintain high perceptual value due to their harmonious visual composition.
Furthermore, low-value areas are mainly found in expansive, monofunctional agricultural zones such as the paddy fields north of the Taipu River or the Jingbang dike fields in the south, where the absence of cultural or spatial layering weakens locality perception. Towns oriented toward heritage tourism, like Lili, Tongli, and Zhenze, benefit from preserved traditional layouts and water-oriented infrastructure, which enhances their perceptual identity.
From a comparative perspective across town, rural, and wilderness areas, clear differences emerge in both landscape composition and perceived locality. Town areas are dominated by built-environment elements such as buildings, roads, and walls, resulting in generally moderate locality scores that reflect urban homogenization and the reduced visibility of historically or ecologically significant features. In these settings, locality perception is mainly shaped by architectural detailing, façade continuity, and the degree of spatial enclosure rather than by natural elements. Rural areas, by contrast, exhibit a hybrid composition of artificial and natural features—including canals, trees, cultivated vegetation, and small-scale buildings—and display the greatest variability in perceived locality. As transitional zones between towns and wilderness, rural landscapes are particularly sensitive to subtle changes in spatial composition, where the visual integration of traditional and contemporary elements can significantly enhance or weaken locality perception. Wilderness areas are predominantly characterized by natural features such as water bodies, vegetation, grasslands, and open sky, and they consistently achieve higher locality scores, especially where traditional elements—such as boats, arched bridges, or vernacular rural structures—remain legible within the landscape. In these environments, perceptions of locality are closely linked to spatial openness, ecological continuity, and the persistence of historical landscape patterns. Overall, variations in locality scores across Wujiang’s small towns are driven not merely by urban density, but by the presence, coherence, and visual integration of cultural and ecological features. These findings highlight the necessity of adopting localized planning and design strategies that respond to the specific spatial composition and perceptual characteristics of each landscape type, rather than applying uniform development models.

3.4. Analysis of the Correlation Between Landscape Types in Wujiang Small Towns and Subjects’ Perceptions of Locality

Further correlation analyses were conducted for the 17 landscape types (Figure 10). The results showed that the landscape elements ‘bridge’ (p = 0.144), ‘water’ (p = 0.115), ‘label’ (p = 0.081), ‘road’ (p = 0.057), ‘boat’ (p = 0.042), ‘door’ (p = 0.043), and ‘grass’ (p = 0.043) all exhibited significant positive correlations with perceived landscape locality. This indicates that the presence and proportion of these elements enhance perceived locality in visual scenes, particularly traditional signature elements such as bridge, water, and label, which are strongly associated with the identity of Jiangnan water towns. The analysis revealed that elements such as water, boats, bridges, and vegetation were positively correlated with perceived locality scores, while sky and walls showed negative correlations.
Spatially, rural and wilderness areas in western towns demonstrated consistently higher locality scores, coinciding with a greater presence of traditional Jiangnan elements such as canals and natural vegetation. In contrast, modernized or industrialized cores of Songling and Shengze exhibited lower scores due to the dominance of built surfaces and visual enclosure.
Conversely, landscape elements such as sky (p = −0.161), windows (p = −0.059), walls (p = −0.035), banisters (p = −0.029), and electric poles (p = −0.025) showed significant negative correlations with perceived landscape locality. This demonstrated that the presence and larger percentage of these elements reduce the level of perceived locality in the visual scene. Specifically, most of these elements are artificial and represent newer built structures that tend to be uniform and monotonous in form and color, creating visual conflict with the traditional landscape characteristics of Jiangnan water towns. In Jiangnan water towns, enclosed street-view environments—formed by narrow alleys, low-rise buildings, eaves, and dense vegetation—limit sky visibility and thereby enhance cultural intimacy and locality. In contrast, high sky visibility in open fields or peri-urban areas often reflects spatial emptiness and a lack of local character, leading to lower perceived locality scores. As a universal backdrop, the sky lacks regional specificity; its visual dominance without supporting cultural elements signals a weaker sense of place in street-level perception.
Overall, among the landscape elements that show positive correlations with locality perception, natural elements account for a higher proportion, whereas man-made elements account for a lower proportion (Figure 11). Conversely, among elements negatively correlated with locality perception, natural elements constitute a smaller share, while man-made elements constitute a larger share. Therefore, natural landscape elements in the wilderness areas of Wujiang District are the primary contributors to locality perception, whereas man-made elements within townships contribute far less to the expression of locality. This further demonstrates that natural landscape elements serve as key carriers linking town and village systems, and form the primary basis for expressing landscape locality.

4. Discussion

4.1. Regional Spatial Differences in the Distribution of Landscape Types and Locality Across Small Towns of Wujiang District Based on Subjective Perception

The spatial heterogeneity of locality perception across Wujiang reflects the combined influence of landscape composition and visual structure rather than the mere presence of built or natural elements. Although natural components dominate the street-view environment, their perceptual contribution varies according to how they are spatially organized and visually integrated. Continuous water systems, vegetation corridors, and open sky views tend to create coherent landscape scenes that reinforce regional identity and strengthen locality perception.
By contrast, highly urbanized environments often fragment these natural structures, replacing them with repetitive architectural forms and standardized infrastructure. Such homogenization weakens visual distinctiveness and reduces the perceptual cues through which observers associate places with local cultural or ecological characteristics. This explains why towns with similar building densities may exhibit markedly different locality perceptions depending on whether natural and historical elements remain embedded within the spatial fabric.
The findings further suggest that transitional rural spaces play an important mediating role between urban and wilderness environments. Because these areas combine artificial and natural features, even small compositional adjustments can significantly alter perceptual outcomes. Consequently, locality perception emerges not solely from individual landscape elements but from the relational configuration among water, vegetation, built form, and cultural artifacts. From this perspective, landscape locality should be understood as an integrated spatial experience shaped by continuity, coherence, and cultural legibility across scales.

4.2. Positive and Negative Spatial Effects of Landscape Types on Locality in Small Towns of Wujiang District

According to the study, spatial variability in the landscape-locality scores of small towns in Wujiang District is evident, influenced not only by subjective environmental perceptions but also by their spatial correlation with the proportional distribution of local landscape elements. As previously discussed, the analysis indicates a significant correlation between the proportional distribution of the 17 landscape categories and landscape-locality scores, with different categories exhibiting either positive or negative associations.
Landscape categories that show positive correlations contain not only a higher proportion of natural elements but also culturally representative man-made elements. These elements, such as grass, bridges, water, and boats, are recognized in the literature as embodying the characteristics of Jiangnan water towns. Although these elements do not account for as large a proportion as first-level landscape elements, they are still perceived as key contributors to locality ratings. This suggests that differences in locality scores arise not only from the visual attributes of landscape elements but also from the cultural resonance and subjective perceptions embedded within the landscape [49]. Conversely, landscape types negatively correlated with locality scores are predominantly within the built environment of small towns, such as walls, windows, and electric poles. These elements weaken perceived landscape locality, particularly walls, which impart a sense of enclosure and insecurity compared with elements such as bridges and boats that promote place attachment and a stronger sense of place [50].
From the planning perspective revealed by these positive and negative impact effects, future planning in Wujiang District can leverage associations with these landscape elements to guide local landscape planning directions. For landscape elements with a strong sense of locality, such as natural water surfaces, the texture of rivers and lakes should be respected in planning. The organizational relationship between river networks, towns, neighborhoods, and farmland should be coordinated to protect these elements, allowing them to maintain their precious local features and to enhance their ecological, recreational value. For landscape elements with a weak sense of locality, such as window and banister, it is necessary to construct a distribution pattern of locally appropriate landscape elements by adjusting their proportion in the environment according to their spatial distribution. In the streetscape environment, their visibility and legibility can be enhanced through landscape creation. This can be achieved by transforming their color, form, style, and structure to ensure harmony with the local environment of Jiangnan water towns. At the same time, planning should gradually harmonize the relationship between the perception of landscape spatial locality and the negative effects of landscape distribution, following the local laws of socio-economic development. It is also necessary to examine which locations in the area need to improve the planning and design of landscape localities, and which locations need to retain the original landscape localities to weaken the impact of urbanization. Especially, the local protection of natural landscapes such as water, trees, and grass, which are concentrated expressions of the natural landscape of Jiangnan water towns, is crucial. These elements evolve together with the townscape, forming an interwoven “water–city” landscape. Accordingly, integrating these natural elements into town spaces, preserving their ecological patterns, and optimizing their perceptual expression constitute key planning recommendations for enhancing landscape locality in small towns. To realize the inheritance and sustainable development of landscape locality in Wujiang District, planning should follow the principle of dynamic adaptation—integrating the old with the new.

4.3. Spatial Patterns of Landscape-Locality Perception Across the Urban–Rural–Wilderness

The interweaving and integration of urban, rural, and wilderness spaces constitute the most distinctive locality feature of small towns in Wujiang. The gradient characteristics of these three spatial types are reflected in spatial morphology, land use patterns, landscape perception, and the composition of natural and artificial landscape elements. Within this gradient, the perceptual distribution of locality demonstrates consistent patterns shaped by spatial form and the cultural–ecological attributes embedded in each landscape type.
Urbanized town centers generally tend to exhibit relatively lower levels of locality perception, primarily due to their dense built-up environments dominated by buildings, walls, windows, fences, poles, signboards, and extensive paved surfaces. These elements correlate negatively with locality and often produce visually enclosed and homogenized streetscapes with limited cultural distinctiveness. The reduced presence of natural components—particularly water bodies, vegetation, and traditional architectural structures—further weakens perceptual identity. Industrial expansion and generic architectural styles may amplify this homogenization effect. However, this tendency is not universal. Towns that retain strong water-town characteristics and maintain the integration of canals, bridges, riparian vegetation, and vernacular spatial forms can still achieve comparatively high locality perception. For example, towns such as Pingwang, Zhenze, and Lili exhibit stronger connections to the traditional forms of Jiangnan water towns and consequently demonstrate relatively high locality scores despite their level of urban development.
In contrast, rural transitional spaces—located between town centers and wilderness zones—comprise hybrid mosaics of canals, small-scale buildings, farmland, trees, and bridges. These landscapes display greater variability in locality scores, as even subtle changes in the spatial arrangement or proportional composition of natural and cultural elements can significantly influence perceptual outcomes. Such areas function as living interfaces where the traditional Jiangnan water-town fabric interacts with contemporary production, settlement, and mobility systems, making locality perception particularly sensitive to spatial openness, continuity of water networks, and the preservation of cultural markers.
Wilderness areas, particularly along the riverbanks, lakefronts, and wetland complexes of Wujiang, generally demonstrate higher locality scores. This is attributable to the dominance of natural elements such as water surfaces, riparian vegetation, reeds, forest patches, open sky, and ecologically continuous corridors. These features retain the archetypal characteristics of Jiangnan’s waterside cultural landscape, in which water and vegetation form both the visual and ecological foundations of regional identity. The openness and coherence of wilderness environments enhance the legibility of cultural and ecological patterns, allowing them to serve as strong anchors of place identity within the broader spatial continuum.
Overall, the urban–rural–wilderness continuum reveals a perceptual gradient in which locality perception tends to increase with the dominance of natural and culturally distinctive elements, decrease with excessive built density and homogenization, and fluctuate within interwoven landscapes where natural and artificial components coexist and interact dynamically.

4.4. Research Limitations

While this study successfully achieved its research objectives and yielded generally reasonable results, several limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, the use of computer semantic segmentation to identify and quantify metrics in street scene images is constrained by the accuracy achievable by deep-learning algorithms, potentially leading to discrepancies between analytical outputs and actual street-scene composition [51]. Moreover, the assessment of landscape locality relied on street-view imagery as visual stimuli, which may introduce bias when compared with evaluations conducted in situ environments [52,53]. Future research should explore methods to correlate landscape distribution characteristics with locality elements at a regional level, considering their interactive mechanisms.
Furthermore, the study utilized relationships between landscape locality ratings derived from smaller samples and their landscape features to predict broader locality outcomes [54]. Despite employing rigorous computational methods and high-precision prediction models, complete alignment between predicted and actual assessments cannot be guaranteed [55]. Methodological limitations aside, the functional characteristics of street-view pavements [56] and their spatial configuration at the landscape interface may influence subjects’ locality perceptions [57].Therefore, future studies should meticulously categorize street views environment types and compare landscape localities across different regions and scales.

5. Conclusions

Landscape locality embodies people’s adaptation to the environment and imbues them with a sense of belonging, identity, and attachment [58]. It integrates natural and cultural elements, combining natural foundations with social and cultural dimensions to enable the comprehension of physical space [59,60]. In doing so, it supports livability across the town–rural–wilderness continuum, which is fundamental to enhancing quality of life.
Quantifying subjective perceptions has long posed a challenge in research [61]. This study provides a measurement and spatial analysis of human perceptions across macro-regional town–rural–wilderness spaces by analyzing street-view imagery using deep learning techniques [62]. The findings are as follows: (1) The spatial distribution of landscape occupancy ratios in Wujiang District exhibits clear regional differentiation, with primary landscape elements widely dispersed across the district, whereas third-level elements are more sporadically distributed. (2) Spatial differentiation in landscape-locality scores among small towns differs from the distribution pattern of landscape occupancy ratios. High-scoring areas predominantly lie along canal networks, whereas low-scoring areas are concentrated in highly urbanized zones. (3) Landscape categories in the small towns of Wujiang District show significant positive and negative correlations with perceptions of landscape locality perception. Positively correlated elements include grass, bridges, water, and boats, whereas negatively correlated elements include sky, windows, walls, and banisters. These findings elucidate perceptual patterns and influencing relationships within Wujiang District’s small towns.
Utilizing open-source street-view data, this study demonstrates how future planning can leverage landscape-locality scores and the spatial distribution of landscape elements to integrate more organically with economic, demographic, and industrial factors. To realize the preservation and sustainable development of landscape locality in Wujiang District, planning should follow the principles of inheritance, dynamic adaptability, and collaborative integration. Specific adaptive planning strategies should optimize locality-related landscape elements, construct coherent locality patterns, and align spatial locality perceptions with emotional experience, thereby better responding to the perceptual needs of residents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z., Y.M. and B.A.; methodology, L.Z., Y.M. and B.A.; investigation, Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z., Y.M. and B.A.; writing—review and editing, L.Z., Y.M. and B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shanghai Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project “Mechanisms and Pathways for the Organic Renewal of Rural Cultural Spaces from the Perspective of ‘Shanghai-Style Jiangnan’” (Grant No. 2024BCK001), and the “Theory and Method of the Ecological Planning of Urban and Rural Landscape with Locality for Livability” National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52130804).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study is a non-interventional, anonymous social perception survey that poses no risk to participants and does not collect any sensitive personal data, it was conducted in accordance with the university’s research guidelines. As per the local regulations for social science research of this nature, formal Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was exempted. However, we confirm that the study strictly adheres to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study via an online electronic process before the commencement of the survey.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Professor Binyi Liu from Macau University of Science and Technology for his invaluable academic guidance and professional insights during the refinement of the landscape analysis and theoretical framework of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ResNet50Residual Network 50
GISGeographic Information System
FCNFully Convolutional Network
CNNConvolutional Neural Networks
KmlKeyhole Markup Language
SPSSStatistical Product and Service Solutions

References

  1. Wang, F.; Prominski, M. Landscapes with locality in urban or rural areas. Indoor Built Environ. 2020, 29, 1047–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Relph, E. Place and Placelessness; Pion: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tuan, Y.-F. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  4. Proshansky, H.M.; Fabian, A.K.; Kaminoff, R. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. J. Environ. Psychol. 1983, 3, 57–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Williams, D.R.; Roggenbuck, J.W. Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. In Proceedings of the NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX, USA, 20–22 October 1989; pp. 32–38. [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams, D.R.; Patterson, M.E.; Roggenbuck, J.W.; Watson, A.E. Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sci. 1992, 14, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lalli, M. Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. J. Environ. Psychol. 1992, 12, 285–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.; Wei, K.; Shuai, Q. Impact of the new round of Hukou system reforms on rural household development resilience in China. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 17098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grasseni, C. Developing Vision, Developing Skill: Locality and Identity in Rural Northern Italy; The University of Manchester: Manchester, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, M.; Yu, B.; Zhuo, R.; Li, Z. A geographic analysis on rural reconstruction-transformation-revitalization: A case study of Jianghan Plain in China. Land 2022, 11, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liao, J.; Liao, Q.; Wang, W.; Shen, S.; Sun, Y.; Xiao, P.; Cao, Y.; Chen, J. Quantifying and mapping landscape value using online texts: A deep learning approach. Appl. Geogr. 2023, 154, 102950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kang, N.; Liu, C. Assessment of visual quality and social perception in traditional landscapes: Nomogram-based quantitative analysis. Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hohensinner, S.; Egger, G.; Muhar, S.; Vaudor, L.; Piégay, H. What remains today of preindustrial Alpine rivers? Census of historical and current channel patterns in the Alps. River Res. Appl. 2020, 37, 128–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Altman, I.; Low, S.M. Place Attachment; Human Behavior & Environment; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 1992; Volume 12. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nasrollahi, N.; Shokri, E. Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 66, 861–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, F.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Z. Homogenization and locality of landscape characteristics in the waterfront space based on geotagged photographs. River Res. Appl. 2023, 39, 1342–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Lu, J.; Meng, Y.; Luo, Y.; Ren, J. Exploring Urban Spatial Quality Through Street View Imagery and Human Perception Analysis. Buildings 2025, 15, 3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, J.; Yue, W.; Li, M.; Gao, J. Mapping human perception of urban landscape from street-view images: A deep-learning approach. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022, 112, 102886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zheng, Z.; Bohong, Z. Study on spatial structure of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration and its effects on urban and rural regions. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2012, 138, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bain, L.; Gray, B.; Rodgers, D. Living Streets: Strategies for Crafting Public Space; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sun, Y. Mapping urban morphological prototypes: Unveiling local identity in historic water towns of the Northern Zhejiang Plain, China. Geocarto Int. 2025, 40, 2547011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, Y.; Sarkar, C.; Xiao, Y. The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: Evidence from Hong Kong. Soc. Sci. Med. 2018, 208, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Davenport, M.; Anderson, D. Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2005, 18, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ferreira, T.; Globevnik, L.; Schinegger, R. Water stressors in Europe: New threats in the old world. In Multiple Stressors in River Ecosystems; Elsevier: Vienna, Austria, 2019; pp. 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, M.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, Y. Research on the Game Mechanism of Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standards Determination: Based on the Empirical Analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Land 2022, 11, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Quercia, D.; O’Hare, N.K.; Aiello, L.M. Aesthetic Capital: What Makes a Cityscapes Beautiful, Quiet, and Happy? In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Seattle, WA, USA, 11–15 February 2012; pp. 945–954. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, R.; Zhao, J.; Meitner, M.J.; Hu, Y.; Xu, X. Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban For. Urban Green. 2019, 41, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, T.; Tang, L.; Liu, J.; Jiang, S.; Yan, J. The Influence of Multi-Sensory Perception on Public Activity in Urban Street Spaces: An Empirical Study Grounded in Landsenses Ecology. Land 2025, 14, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Hang, T.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, L. Integrating restorative perception into urban street planning: A framework using street view images, deep learning, and space syntax. Cities 2024, 147, 104791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Z.; Xu, H.; Lin, Q. Deep learning assessment of street spatial quality in old residential communities of Wuchang, Wuhan, China. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 45176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Xiong, X.; Wu, Y.; Ma, M.; Yang, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Ye, H.; Hu, Y. Exploring the multidimensional visual perception of urban riverfront street environments: A framework using street view images, deep learning and eye-tracking. Land 2025, 14, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Water Affairs Bureau of Wujiang District, Suzhou City. Policy Interpretation of the “14th Five-Year Water Affairs Development Plan of Wujiang District, Suzhou City” [EB/OL]. Available online: https://www.wujiang.gov.cn/zgwj/zcfgjd/202210/e5056abdd68943dc8b8175cc1a6f8dba.shtml (accessed on 25 December 2025).
  33. Bureau of Natural Resources and Planning of Wujiang District, Suzhou City. Master Plan for Territorial Spatial Planning of Wujiang District, Suzhou City (2021–2035); Suzhou Municipal People’s Government: Suzhou, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  34. Executive Committee of the Yangtze River Delta Eco-Green Integrated Development Demonstration Zone; People’s Government of Qingpu District, Shanghai Municipality; People’s Government of Wujiang District, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province; Master Plan for Territorial Spatial Planning of the Pilot Start-Up Area of the Yangtze River Delta Eco-Green Integrated Development Demonstration Zone (2021–2035): Draft for Public Consultation [R/OL]. Available online: https://www.planning.org.cn/law/news_view?id=13779 (accessed on 28 March 2023).
  35. Peris, E.; Arguelles, M. Small-area Analysis of Social Inequalities in Exposure to Environmental Noise Across Four Urban Areas in England. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 95, 104603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kuang, B.; Yang, H.; Jung, T. The Impact of Visual Elements in Street View on Street Quality: A Quantitative Study Based on Deep Learning, Elastic Net Regression, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Sustainability 2025, 17, 3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, R.; Huang, C.; Ye, Y. Measuring Street Quality: A Human-Centered Exploration Based on Multi-Sourced Data and Classical Urban Design Theories. Buildings 2024, 14, 3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhong, W.; Wang, L.; Han, X.; Gao, Z. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Perception Using Multi-Year Street View Images and Deep Learning. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Tao, L.; Hu, S.; Hao, M. An Urban Built Environment Analysis Approach for Street View Images Based on Graph Convolutional Neural Networks. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, M.; Zheng, X.; Qin, P.; Cui, W.; Ji, Q. Urban Color Perception and Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning and Street View Big Data. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Du, X.; Liu, M.; Luo, S. Exploring Equity in a Hierarchical Medical Treatment System: A Focus on Determinants of Spatial Accessibility. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hartig, T.; Johansson, G.; Kylin, C. Residence in the social ecology of stress and restoration. J. Soc. Issues 2003, 59, 611–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Katherine, B.; Sara, T. Using virtual street audits to understand the walkability of older adults’ route choices by gender and age. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, L.; Yang, X.; Yin, L. Exploration of pedestrian refuge effect on safety crossing at signalized intersection. Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 2193, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Daniel, T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Soini, K.; Pouta, E.; Salmiovirta, M.; Uusitalo, M.; Kivinen, T. Local residents’ perceptions of energy landscape: The case of transmission lines. Land Use Policy 2011, 28, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Warren, C.R.; Mcfadyen, M. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 2010, 27, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, L.; Miao, Y.; Linna, A. An experimental eye-movement study on the spatial attraction characteristics and perception of different landscape types in ethnic villages. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2023, 149, 04023039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Halonen, J.I.; Vahtera, J.; Stansfeld, S.; Yli-Tuomi, T.; Salo, P.; Pentti, J.; Kivimäki, M.; Lanki, T. Associations between nighttime traffic noise and sleep: The Finnish Public Sector Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mehta, V. Look closely and you will see, listen carefully and you will hear: Urban design and social interaction on streets. J. Urban Des. 2009, 14, 29–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Paquette, S.; Domon, G. Changing ruralities, changing landscapes: Exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach. J. Rural Stud. 2003, 19, 425–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martin, B.; Ortega, E.; Otero, I.; Arce, R.M. Landscape character assessment with GIS using map-based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 180, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wong, S.F. Walkability and community identity in the city centre of Kuala Lumpur. In Walkability; Wong, S.F., Ed.; University of Melbourne: Melbourne, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, F.; Gao, C. Settlement–river relationship and locality of river-related built environment. Indoor Built Environ. 2020, 29, 1331–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Plieninger, T.; Dijks, S.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Bieling, C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hull, R.B.; Stewart, W.P. Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. J. Environ. Psychol. 1992, 12, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ye, C.; Zhu, J.; Li, S.; Yang, S.; Chen, M. Assessment and analysis of regional economic collaborative development within an urban agglomeration: Yangtze River Delta as a case study. Habitat Int. 2019, 83, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Soini, K.; Vaarala, H.; Pouta, E. Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 104, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. De Silva, C.S.; Warusavitharana, E.J.; Ratnayake, R. An examination of the temporal effects of environmental cues on pedestrians’ feelings of safety. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2017, 64, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guida-Johnson, B.; Faggi, A.M.; Zuleta, G.A. Effects of urban sprawl on riparian vegetation: Is compact or dispersed urbanization better for biodiversity? River Res. Appl. 2017, 33, 959–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hartig, T.; Böö, A.; Garvill, J.; Olsson, T.; Gärling, T. Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scand. J. Psychol. 1996, 37, 378–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Photographs of Urban, Rural, and Suburban Landscape Elements in Wujiang.
Figure 1. Photographs of Urban, Rural, and Suburban Landscape Elements in Wujiang.
Buildings 16 01214 g001
Figure 2. Location of Wujiang District and distribution of selected small towns.
Figure 2. Location of Wujiang District and distribution of selected small towns.
Buildings 16 01214 g002
Figure 3. Machine learning-based quantitative measurement framework for objective environmental representations.
Figure 3. Machine learning-based quantitative measurement framework for objective environmental representations.
Buildings 16 01214 g003
Figure 4. Schematic architecture of the ResNet50-based perception classification framework.
Figure 4. Schematic architecture of the ResNet50-based perception classification framework.
Buildings 16 01214 g004
Figure 5. The calculation process of subjective perception evaluation of landscape locality.
Figure 5. The calculation process of subjective perception evaluation of landscape locality.
Buildings 16 01214 g005
Figure 6. Major Landscape Elements with the Highest Proportions in Street View Environments of Wujiang District.
Figure 6. Major Landscape Elements with the Highest Proportions in Street View Environments of Wujiang District.
Buildings 16 01214 g006
Figure 7. Spatialization Map of Urban and Rural Landscape in Wujiang District in 2023.
Figure 7. Spatialization Map of Urban and Rural Landscape in Wujiang District in 2023.
Buildings 16 01214 g007
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of the statistical share of each type of landscape elements in the street views environment of Wujiang District.
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of the statistical share of each type of landscape elements in the street views environment of Wujiang District.
Buildings 16 01214 g008
Figure 9. Distribution of kernel density of landscape locality evaluation score in Wujiang District.
Figure 9. Distribution of kernel density of landscape locality evaluation score in Wujiang District.
Buildings 16 01214 g009
Figure 10. Correlation analysis between landscape types and perception of place in Wujiang District.
Figure 10. Correlation analysis between landscape types and perception of place in Wujiang District.
Buildings 16 01214 g010
Figure 11. Distribution of elements showing positive effects of landscape locality and landscape type in Wujiang district.
Figure 11. Distribution of elements showing positive effects of landscape locality and landscape type in Wujiang district.
Buildings 16 01214 g011
Table 1. Data sources and classifications.
Table 1. Data sources and classifications.
DataTypeSource
KmlTrajectory data2bulu
PhotoStreet View Pictures2bulu
Wujiang Administrative Boundaryline dataData Platform of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Table 2. Classification of Landscape Elements in Urban and Rural Wild Spaces.
Table 2. Classification of Landscape Elements in Urban and Rural Wild Spaces.
TownRuralWilderness
BuildingsBridgesSky
RoadsBoatsTrees
WallsTreesVegetation
WindowsVegetationGrass
DoorsBuildings
CarsRoads
Poles
Fences
Signboards
People
Table 3. Statistical share of each type of landscape elements in the street views environment of Wujiang District.
Table 3. Statistical share of each type of landscape elements in the street views environment of Wujiang District.
WallBuildingsSkyTreeRoadWindowGrassPeopleDoorMountainPlants
4.87%9.61%24.62%17.54%7.08%0.04%2.74%0.17%0.12%0.11%7.49%
CarWaterBanisterRockRailingLabelSandBridgeBoatStreetlightsElectric poles
0.70%10.37%0.77%0.37%0.42%0.30%0.09%0.10%0.02%0.05%0.27%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Miao, Y.; Alessandro, B. How Can Crowd Perception Methodologies Be Employed to Understand the Locality Characteristics of Small Towns Within the Jiangnan Water Network? From the Perspective of Urban–Rural–Wildland Integration. Buildings 2026, 16, 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061214

AMA Style

Zhang L, Miao Y, Alessandro B. How Can Crowd Perception Methodologies Be Employed to Understand the Locality Characteristics of Small Towns Within the Jiangnan Water Network? From the Perspective of Urban–Rural–Wildland Integration. Buildings. 2026; 16(6):1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Lin, Yankai Miao, and Bianchi Alessandro. 2026. "How Can Crowd Perception Methodologies Be Employed to Understand the Locality Characteristics of Small Towns Within the Jiangnan Water Network? From the Perspective of Urban–Rural–Wildland Integration" Buildings 16, no. 6: 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061214

APA Style

Zhang, L., Miao, Y., & Alessandro, B. (2026). How Can Crowd Perception Methodologies Be Employed to Understand the Locality Characteristics of Small Towns Within the Jiangnan Water Network? From the Perspective of Urban–Rural–Wildland Integration. Buildings, 16(6), 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop