Next Article in Journal
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a Bolted Angle Connector Beam-to-Column Joint with a Stiffener
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study on Internal and External Damage Imaging Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves Within a Variational Bayesian PCA Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Maximum Damage Under Earthquake Effects Based on a Probabilistic Approach in Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

An Improved Equation for Predicting the Stress of Bonded High-Strength Strands at Flexural Failure

Department of Civil Systems Engineering, Ajou University, 206, Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si 16499, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(1), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010179
Submission received: 23 November 2025 / Revised: 29 December 2025 / Accepted: 30 December 2025 / Published: 31 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Advanced Concrete Structures in Civil Engineering)

Abstract

To achieve efficient design and ensure the safety of concrete structures, the use of high-strength concrete, reinforcing steel, and prestressing tendons has been steadily increasing. In this study, for flexural design of prestressed concrete (PSC) structures employing high-strength strands with tensile strengths of 2160 MPa and 2360 MPa, the applicability of the current design-code equation for predicting the strand stress at flexural failure (f ps )—which was originally proposed based on studies of conventional strands with tensile strengths of 1860 MPa or lower—was evaluated. Furthermore, an improved prediction equation was proposed. Section analyses based on stress–strain curves obtained from numerous tensile tests of high-strength strands were conducted, and the results were compared with the existing prediction equations specified in ACI 318 and the Korean KDS code. The comparison revealed that, for high-strength strands, the strand stress tends to be underestimated in the tension-controlled region and overestimated in the compression-controlled region. To address these issues, a new prediction equation was proposed that retains the form of the existing equation but incorporates correction factors reflecting the characteristics of high-strength strands. The performance of the proposed equation was evaluated not only for rectangular sections but also for T- and I-shaped sections, and its predictive accuracy was verified by comparing the predicted strand stresses and nominal flexural strengths with those obtained from section analyses. As a result, the proposed prediction equation demonstrated improved accuracy compared with the existing one, while maintaining an appropriate level of conservatism. Therefore, it is expected to enhance design efficiency for PSC structures employing high-strength strands.
Keywords: prestressed concrete; prestressing tendon; high-strength strand; strand stress; flexural strength prestressed concrete; prestressing tendon; high-strength strand; strand stress; flexural strength

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sung, K.-J.; Hong, J.; Jeon, S.-J. An Improved Equation for Predicting the Stress of Bonded High-Strength Strands at Flexural Failure. Buildings 2026, 16, 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010179

AMA Style

Sung K-J, Hong J, Jeon S-J. An Improved Equation for Predicting the Stress of Bonded High-Strength Strands at Flexural Failure. Buildings. 2026; 16(1):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010179

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sung, Kyeong-Jin, Jisu Hong, and Se-Jin Jeon. 2026. "An Improved Equation for Predicting the Stress of Bonded High-Strength Strands at Flexural Failure" Buildings 16, no. 1: 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010179

APA Style

Sung, K.-J., Hong, J., & Jeon, S.-J. (2026). An Improved Equation for Predicting the Stress of Bonded High-Strength Strands at Flexural Failure. Buildings, 16(1), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010179

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop