Next Article in Journal
The Utilization of Wet Silica Sand Sludge as an Additive in Different Temperature Sustainable Brick Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Enabling High-Level Worker-Centric Semantic Understanding of Onsite Images Using Visual Language Models with Attention Mechanism and Beam Search Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
Identifying Safety Technology Opportunities to Mitigate Safety-Related Issues on Construction Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Contact Dimensional Quality Inspection System of Prefabricated Components Using 3D Matrix Camera
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Radiance Field-Inspired Methods for 3D Indoor Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis

1
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW 2745, Australia
3
North China Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(6), 848; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060848
Submission received: 24 January 2025 / Revised: 21 February 2025 / Accepted: 1 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence and Automation in Construction Industry)

Abstract

An efficient and robust solution for 3D indoor reconstruction is crucial for various managerial operations in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector, such as indoor asset tracking and facility management. Conventional approaches, primarily relying on SLAM and deep learning techniques, face certain limitations. With the recent emergence of radiance field (RF)-inspired methods, such as Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), it is worthwhile to evaluate their capability and applicability for reconstructing built environments in the AEC domain. This paper aims to compare different RF-inspired methods with conventional SLAM-based methods and to assess their potential use for asset management and related downstream tasks in indoor environments. Experiments were conducted in university and laboratory settings, focusing on 3D indoor reconstruction and semantic asset segmentation. The results indicate that 3DGS and Nerfacto generally outperform other NeRF-based methods. In addition, this study provides guidance on selecting appropriate reconstruction approaches for specific use cases.
Keywords: 3D indoor reconstruction; radiance field; comparative analysis 3D indoor reconstruction; radiance field; comparative analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, S.; Wang, J.; Xia, J.; Shou, W. Evaluating Radiance Field-Inspired Methods for 3D Indoor Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Buildings 2025, 15, 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060848

AMA Style

Xu S, Wang J, Xia J, Shou W. Evaluating Radiance Field-Inspired Methods for 3D Indoor Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Buildings. 2025; 15(6):848. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Shuyuan, Jun Wang, Jingfeng Xia, and Wenchi Shou. 2025. "Evaluating Radiance Field-Inspired Methods for 3D Indoor Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis" Buildings 15, no. 6: 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060848

APA Style

Xu, S., Wang, J., Xia, J., & Shou, W. (2025). Evaluating Radiance Field-Inspired Methods for 3D Indoor Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis. Buildings, 15(6), 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop