Next Article in Journal
Residential Indoor Humidity During Cooling Operation: Energy Benefits Without Compromising Comfort, Health, or Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Response of an Over-Track Building to Metro Train Loads: A Scale Model Test
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enabling Real-Time Mechanical Analysis in Digital Twin Systems: A Study on Multi-Source Heterogeneous Data Fusion via Midas Civil Integration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Building Modeling Process Using Point Cloud Data and the Digital Twin Approach: An Industrial Case Study from Turkey

by
Zeliha Hazal Kandemir
and
Özge Akboğa Kale
*
Civil Engineering Department, Izmir Demokrasi University, Izmir 35140, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(24), 4469; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244469
Submission received: 15 November 2025 / Revised: 3 December 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 10 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Twins in Construction, Engineering and Management)

Abstract

This study presents a terrestrial-laser-scanning-based scan-to-BIM workflow that transforms point cloud data into a BIM-based digital twin and analyzes how data collected with LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) can be converted into an information-rich model using Autodesk ReCap and Revit. Point clouds provided by laser scanning were processed in the ReCap environment and imported into Revit in an application that took place within an industrial facility of approximately 240 m2 in Izmir. The scans were registered and pre-processed in Autodesk ReCap 2022 and modeled in Autodesk Revit 2022, with visualization updates prepared in Autodesk Revit 2023. Geometric quality was evaluated using point-to-model distance checks, since the dataset was imported in a pre-registered form and ReCap did not provide station-level RMSE values. The findings indicate that the ReCap–Revit integration offers high geometric accuracy and visual detail for both building elements and production-line machinery, but that high data density and complex geometry limit processing performance and interactivity. The study highlights both the practical applicability and the current technical limitations of terrestrial-laser-scanning-based scan-to-BIM workflows in an industrial context, offering a replicable reference model for future digital twin implementations in Turkey.

1. Introduction

Digitalization is among the most significant transformational tools in the construction industry, and redefines the processes of design, construction, and operation. The attempts to become more efficient, the growing complexity of projects, and the necessity to organize and manage data have led the industry to transition to information-based decision-making processes [1,2]. While traditional two-dimensional design and coordination methods cause problems such as information loss, design conflicts, and increased costs, digitalization offers holistic solutions to address these faults [3]. The need for data integration and coordination, particularly in multidisciplinary projects, has made the adoption of digital methods essential [4,5].
One of the most significant reflections of this transformation in the construction industry is Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology. BIM is an integrated digital representation, a comprehensive description of the physical and functional features of buildings, and it generates a universal information base at the stage of design, construction, and operation [3,6]. According to this technology, all stakeholders of the project can work on the same model, and in this way, there is less loss of information, fewer mistakes in the design, and more efficiency in the project [7]. In addition, its 4D (time management), 5D (cost analysis), and 7D (operation and maintenance management) dimensions provide full solutions to building lifecycle management [4,8].
The digitalization processes based on BIM have come to a new stage in recent years, and the concept of the Digital Twin has appeared. According to recent studies, digital twin technologies have developed speedily due to the introduction of BIM, IoT, and artificial intelligence to facilitate real-time monitoring and predictive management in the built environment. Tuhaise et al. [9] found the key enabling technologies for digital twins in the construction industry and highlighted the need to establish interoperability between BIM and data-driven systems. The systematic review conducted by Liu et al. [10] showcased the increased application of digital twin technologies to buildings and cities, even though it also emphasizes the fact that the practical, scalable implementation of digital twins should be promoted to industries. Pan et al. [11] also showed that semantic point cloud data can be converted into information-rich BIM models by deep learning-based approaches to significantly increase the accuracy and automation of the processes of digital twin creation.
Grieves [12] and Tao et al. [13] suggest that a digital twin is a dynamically operating data-driven and interactive representation of a physical asset or system in a digital space. This approach combines BIM, IoT (Internet of Things), big data, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to enable real-time monitoring, analysis, and predictive maintenance throughout the lifecycle of buildings [14,15]. Fuller et al. [14] stated that digital twins enhance operational efficiency, safety, and sustainable management in construction projects, while Wang et al. [5] stated that IoT-enabled digital twins deliver effective results in terms of energy performance and facility management.
Digital twin technologies are used in a wide range of applications, including building management [4], industrial facility optimization [16], infrastructure monitoring [1], cultural heritage documentation [17], and urban planning [18]. Recent studies indicate that digital twins offer significant contributions not only to the design process but also to processes such as construction phase monitoring and maintenance planning [14,15].
The recent studies have paid attention to the applications and technical specifications of the digital twin. As an example, Abreu et al. [19] found that point cloud-based modeling boosts the accuracy of models in the cases of scan-to-BIM and scan-vs-BIM; Tang et al. [20] and Dore and Murphy [17] found that laser scanning (LiDAR) technologies improve data integrity in the model of the interior space. These technologies produce high-precision datasets for the digitalization of existing buildings and provide a solid geometric foundation for the digital twin creation process.
Despite the increasing number of studies in the literature on the application areas of digital twin technologies, the creation of digital twins of existing buildings through the integration of point cloud data into the Building Information Modeling (BIM) environment has been addressed in limited application-based research [19,20,21]. This demonstrates that point cloud-based digital twin creation remains an area of methodological and practical development. Although scan-to-BIM and digital twin approaches are rapidly becoming widespread worldwide, practical examples of these methods, especially in industrial facilities, are quite limited in Turkey.
In parallel, recent research has increasingly explored AI-assisted point cloud segmentation and automated object recognition as a means of reducing manual modeling effort in scan-to-BIM workflows, particularly for complex indoor environments and industrial assets [22]. However, these developments have only rarely been evaluated in real industrial facilities, and there is still a lack of case studies that report not only qualitative benefits but also quantitative indicators of accuracy, modeling effort, and performance.
Although the global literature on digital twins and scan-to-BIM workflows has expanded significantly, practical implementations in industrial facilities—particularly within emerging economies such as Turkey—remain extremely limited. Existing studies rarely provide a detailed, replicable framework that evaluates both geometric precision and operational applicability. This study addresses these gaps by presenting one of the first industrial-scale implementations of a LiDAR-based digital twin workflow in Turkey, documenting the complete process from data acquisition to modeling, reporting accuracy and performance metrics, and extending conventional scan-to-BIM practices to include production-line machinery through parametric Revit Families.

2. Methodology

The methodology employed in this study involves the integration of point cloud data obtained using LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technology, based on a scan-to-BIM approach, into the Building Information Modeling (BIM)-based Digital Twin production process using Autodesk ReCap 2022 and Autodesk Revit 2022 software.
The implemented method consists of four main stages that follow a scan-to-BIM logic: (i) data collection using terrestrial LiDAR, (ii) point cloud preprocessing and registration in Autodesk ReCap, (iii) data integration and parametric modeling in Autodesk Revit, and (iv) enrichment of the BIM model into a digital twin including production-line machinery. Each stage is described in detail in Section 2.1, Section 2.2, Section 2.3 and Section 2.4, with special emphasis on software versions, hardware configuration, and workflow decisions to support reproducibility.
This framework is based on the scan-to-BIM methodology described in the literature [19,20] and aims to ensure accuracy, integrity, and information continuity in the digital transfer of existing buildings.

2.1. Data Collection: LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technology is a remote sensing method that allows the acquisition of three-dimensional (3D) coordinate data by measuring the return time of laser pulses sent to surfaces [23].
This method enables the generation of point cloud data that represents the physical geometry of structures or objects with high accuracy.
As part of the study, the interior and exterior of the factory were documented using a terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) campaign. The scan data was acquired with a FARO terrestrial laser scanner, although the exact device model was not available to the authors. A total of 36 scan locations were distributed across the production hall and exterior facade to ensure sufficient coverage and overlap for accurate cloud-to-cloud registration. The scanned area corresponds to a single high-bay industrial hall with an approximate floor area of 240 m2, containing dense mechanical equipment such as vertical tanks, platforms, and processing lines, which created a challenging three-dimensional environment for data acquisition. Despite these constraints, the TLS configuration provided adequate geometric completeness for transferring the existing structure into a digital environment.
Scanning parameters were optimized according to the technical capabilities of the device and the environmental conditions.
Such a strategy allowed obtaining very precise information when transferring the digital version of the already existing three-dimensional geometry of the structure.
In addition, key LiDAR scanning parameters—including point density, station spacing, field-of-view coverage, and overlap ratio between consecutive stations—were optimized to ensure uniform data quality across the industrial environment. These parameters were adjusted according to surface reflectivity, interior clutter, and operational constraints of the active production facility, ensuring a consistent point distribution suitable for accurate BIM reconstruction.

2.2. Data Processing: Autodesk ReCap

Autodesk ReCap software is a pre-processing tool used to align, filter, and optimize laser scan data [24]. ReCap software aligns data from different scan points by using a cloud-to-cloud registration algorithm to create a holistic 3D point cloud [19,21].
In this study, LiDAR scans were imported into the ReCap environment, combined using an automatic alignment algorithm, and noise data was removed.
During the data optimization process, errors originating from glossy surfaces and reflections from moving objects were eliminated.
ReCap was chosen because it reduces the need for manual intervention in high-volume point cloud data and produces a data format (.RCP) compatible with Revit.
This process minimized data loss and increased the accuracy of the subsequent modeling phase.
The point cloud was delivered to the authors as a pre-registered dataset, already aligned by the surveying team using the FARO TLS processing workflow prior to import into Autodesk ReCap. Because the scans arrived in a fully registered state, ReCap did not display station-level registration diagnostics or RMSE values; therefore, numerical registration errors could not be extracted directly from the software. Registration quality was instead assessed visually by inspecting the consistency of overlaps between the 36 scan locations, reviewing cross-sections, and checking for signs of drift, duplicated geometry, or local misalignment across the dataset.
A detailed quality-control routine was implemented during preprocessing, including the verification of overlap sufficiency among scan stations and the assessment of residual noise around metallic and highly reflective surfaces. The final exported .RCP dataset was validated against on-site reference dimensions to confirm suitability for LOD-300-level BIM.

2.3. Transfer to BIM Environment: Revit Integration

Autodesk Revit is a parametric design platform based on Building Information Modeling (BIM), allowing the creation of component-based intelligent models [25] that maintain geometric and informational relationships among building elements [3]. In this study, the modeling phase was carried out in Autodesk Revit 2022, while some of the views and visualizations included in the paper were updated in Revit 2023 without modifying the underlying geometry or parametric structure of the model.
The registered point cloud dataset exported from Autodesk ReCap was brought into Revit using the linked point cloud workflow, where the .RCP file served as a fixed spatial reference throughout the modeling process. This approach enabled the digital reconstruction of the physical elements of the building—including walls, columns, floors, roofs, platforms, and equipment supports—directly on top of the point cloud.
To establish a consistent modeling framework, levels, grids, and reference planes were created and aligned with the coordinate system defined by the imported TLS data. Structural and architectural elements were then traced, parameterized, and dimensioned according to the geometric indicators provided by the point cloud.
The modeling scope corresponded to a Level of Detail (LOD) of 300, as described in the relevant literature [6,19]. In this project, LOD-300 compliance was ensured by modeling all primary structural elements with their true dimensions, relative positions, and relational constraints, and by verifying that deviations between the Revit elements and the point cloud remained within an acceptable tolerance of approximately 10 mm, based on point-to-model distance measurements carried out at multiple locations.
Revit was selected for this workflow because its parametric modeling infrastructure supports point-cloud-based reconstruction and maintains information continuity during the creation of digital twins, enabling each modeled element to carry both geometric fidelity and relevant metadata required for future analysis, renovation planning, or integration with additional digital systems.

2.4. Digital Twin Modeling

A digital twin is defined as a dynamic, data-driven representation of a physical asset in a digital environment [14,15].
This model includes not only geometric accuracy but also the relationships between structural components, material information, and usage data.
The model, completed in the Revit environment, was structured in accordance with these principles. The model was compared with point cloud data and evaluated for visual and dimensional accuracy. Potential clashes between structural elements were analyzed with a clash detection tool.
Machines on the factory production line were modeled as parametric components in the Revit Family environment, thus expanding the digital representation of the structure to include the manufacturing system. For each machine family, non-geometric parameters were added to capture functional attributes relevant to facility management, including equipment type, manufacturer and model, rated capacity, power demand, installation date, and maintenance interval. Where available, process-related attributes such as throughput and operating schedule were stored as instance parameters, enabling the model to be queried not only for geometric fit but also for production and maintenance planning.
The goal in this phase is not only to digitize the current state but also to create a digital decision support system that can be used for future equipment changes or capacity planning, for example, by computing available floor areas for new machines, checking safety clearances around hazardous zones, or testing alternative machinery layouts before construction.

2.5. Method Summary

The applied method is an integrated process, which consists of LiDAR-based data collection, data processing with Autodesk ReCap, modeling with Autodesk Revit, and digital twin production. This process is shown illustrated in Figure 1. The diagram presents the data flow and software interaction between the four main stages of the study in an integrated manner.
Each phase was planned based on the principles of accuracy, information continuity, and model integrity.
LiDAR technology enabled documentation of the physical environment, ReCap optimized the data, and the Revit environment enabled parametric modeling.
This approach, which combines the scan-to-BIM model in the literature with the concept of a digital twin, provides a viable methodological framework for the digitization of existing buildings.
To support the reproducibility of this study, all scanning configurations, preprocessing steps, registration processes, and modeling criteria were documented systematically. The entire workflow—ranging from LiDAR data acquisition to ReCap preprocessing and Revit-based modeling—was carried out using commercially available hardware and software. Therefore, the methodology presented here can be replicated in similar industrial environments using standard terrestrial laser scanners and Autodesk tools.

2.6. Hardware Configuration and Software Versions

All preprocessing and modeling tasks were performed on mid-range workstations comparable to a Dell G3 15 laptop equipped with an Intel Core i7-9750H CPU, 16 GB of RAM, and an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Max-Q) GPU. The project team used machines of similar specifications during the three-month modeling and revision period. Autodesk ReCap Pro 2022 was used for point cloud preprocessing and Autodesk Revit 2022 for modeling, while some visualization updates were prepared in Revit 2023. Reporting these specifications provides context for the performance observations discussed in Section 4.1 and supports the reproducibility and transparency of the digital workflow.

3. Case Study

This section explains how the method used in the study was applied to a real building. The field study was conducted to test the validity of the method and demonstrate the advantages offered by the scan-to-BIM process in digital twin production. For this purpose, an industrial building in Izmir was selected, and the data collection, processing, and modeling stages were implemented sequentially. This section of the study first provides a general overview of the project, then covers the LiDAR-based scanning process, the processes performed in Autodesk ReCap and Revit, and the characteristics of the resulting digital model.

3.1. Project Introduction and Scope

The field study was conducted at an oil production facility in Izmir. The facility was selected because of the need to document the structure’s measurements prior to the renovation of the existing production line.
The main production space considered in this study corresponds to a single factory hall with an approximate floor area of 240 m2. The hall accommodates several vertical tanks, platforms, and a conveyor line, together with a surrounding envelope of walls, windows, and roof elements. This combination of high-bay industrial space and densely arranged mechanical equipment makes the facility a representative test bed for scan-to-BIM applications in production environments.
The factory’s active production process, complex interior structure, and diverse equipment provided a suitable environment for testing the scan-to-BIM method.
The primary objective of the project is to document the current state of the physical structure by creating a three-dimensional digital twin and to plan new machinery layouts.
Figure 2 shows multi-point laser scans of the factory exterior aligned in the Autodesk ReCap Pro interface. This figure visually demonstrates the exterior coverage of the scan data and how the point clouds are combined.

3.2. Scanning Process

Scanning operations were conducted in a facility environment where production activities were ongoing. Scanning stations were positioned to cover the entire geometry of the structure, and data was acquired at different elevations and angles. In total, 36 scan locations were used, distributed along the length of the hall and around the exterior facade to capture both the building envelope and the mechanical equipment from multiple viewpoints. The survey was carried out while the factory was in operation, requiring coordination with staff to avoid line-of-sight obstructions and to minimize the presence of moving objects in critical areas.
Environmental conditions, particularly reflections on metal surfaces and moving objects, were factors affecting data quality. These factors were minimized during the data processing phase using noise filtering methods.
Figure 3 shows an aligned view of multi-point scans performed indoors. This image is important because it demonstrates the density of the scan data and how it is organized in ReCap software.
Additionally, Figure 4 illustrates an exterior point cloud visualization generated in Autodesk ReCap Pro using density-based coloring. This view highlights the overall spatial distribution of the TLS dataset, showing the point density variations across the facade and roof surfaces. The inclusion of scan locations further demonstrates the geometric richness and the extent of the 4.82 GB dataset collected across 36 scanning stations.
Figure 5 provides a detailed interior point cloud visualization from Autodesk ReCap Pro, illustrating the high-density sampling around tanks, elevated walkways, machinery, and piping systems. This view highlights the geometric complexity of the industrial environment and demonstrates why the resulting TLS dataset reached 4.82 GB. The dense clustering of points in constrained areas also explains the performance limitations discussed in Section 4.1.

3.3. Data Processing with Autodesk ReCap

Scan data was processed in the Autodesk ReCap Pro environment. The automatic alignment algorithm combined the different scan locations into a single coordinate system.
Unnecessary reflections and erroneous points were removed through manual cleaning processes.
Data accuracy and coverage were analyzed in the ReCap environment using RGB, Intensity, and Scan Location visualization modes.
Registration and cleaning were performed iteratively over several processing sessions, with alignment quality checked visually and via ReCap’s error statistics. The modest size of the ReCap project file (approximately 42.9 kB referencing the scan data) meant that most performance constraints arose later in the BIM environment, rather than during preprocessing.
Figure 6 shows the normal-density RGB view of the factory interior point cloud, corresponding to the scan alignment shown previously in Figure 3. This figure provides an idea of the data quality before modeling by representing the color-based separation of surfaces and data density.

3.4. Modeling with Autodesk Revit

The point cloud processed in ReCap was added to the Revit as a “linked point cloud.” Figure 7 shows the BIM–point cloud overlay in a three-dimensional view, illustrating how the imported TLS dataset was used as a geometric reference during the modeling process.
Figure 8 shows the elevation view in Revit, where point cloud data is aligned with floor elevations. This figure explains how the building elements are aligned with the point cloud during the modeling process.
The modeling infrastructure was created by defining floor elevations and axis systems; structural components (walls, columns, floors, roofs, etc.) were modeled according to the point cloud reference.
Figure 9 shows the phase where wall parameters are defined in the Revit environment. This phase demonstrates the role of parametric definition of the digital model in improving accuracy.
The modeling level was carried out at a level of detail that ensured the accurate representation of the building geometry.
The machines on the production line were modeled parametrically in the Revit Family module; the digital twin was developed to include both structural and functional components. The modeling work was undertaken by a team of five people over approximately three months of working days, with additional support from interns when required. This effort covered the entire pipeline from point-cloud import to the finalized LOD-300 model and included multiple revision cycles in response to stakeholder feedback.
The resulting Revit project file is relatively compact (12.2 MB). However, the actual performance limitations observed during modeling were caused not by the size of the Revit model but by the high-volume point cloud dataset. The raw terrestrial laser scan data amounted to approximately 4.82 GB, consisting of 609 scan-derived files. This high-volume dataset, rather than the Revit model, was responsible for reduced navigation responsiveness when all 36 scan locations and detailed machine families were visible in the modeling environment.
Finally, Figure 10 shows a three-dimensional digital twin of the factory, created in Revit, with the point-to-model conversion complete. This figure demonstrates the completed scan-to-BIM process and the digital representation of the physical structure.

4. Findings and Discussion

The field study scan-to-BIM process yielded great accuracy, integrity, and visual quality of the digitization of the physical structure. It was noted that the interaction of Autodesk ReCap software and Autodesk Revit software offered an effective process in processing and modeling of the point cloud information. The findings from the study were evaluated in terms of both geometric accuracy and modeling efficiency.

4.1. Evaluation of Findings

To quantitatively assess the geometric accuracy of the BIM model, point-to-model distances were measured at several representative locations by comparing Revit model edges with the closest points in the TLS-derived point cloud. The deviations were found to lie within an average range of approximately 8 mm, as illustrated in Figure 11, where a typical distance of 7.49 mm was observed. This accuracy level is consistent with the expected performance of terrestrial laser scanning–based as-built modeling and falls well within the acceptable tolerance for LOD-300 workflows.
ReCap software achieved successful results in registration and denoising processes during the processing of raw LiDAR data. The automatic alignment algorithm’s ability to combine different scan positions with minimal manual intervention significantly reduced data processing time. This finding confirms that ReCap is a suitable preprocessing tool for working with high-volume data in the scan-to-BIM process, as emphasized by Abreu et al. [19].
The modeling process, conducted in the Revit environment, achieved high accuracy, particularly in terms of the alignment of structural elements relative to the point cloud reference. The model created out of the point cloud was very similar to the position and size of the physical structure elements. Such a degree of precision is comparable to the range of accuracy reported in as-built BIM models by Bosché et al. [21] and Dore and Murphy [17].
Using the digital twin approach and the model together allowed making the current state of the factory digitally measurable, analyzable, and adaptable to future changes. In this respect, the study embodies the “data-driven dynamic system” defined by Fuller et al. [14] and Omrany et al. [15].

4.2. Comparison with the Literature

The obtained results demonstrate a high level of methodological similarity when compared to similar applications in international literature. Particularly, Valero et al. [26] and Abreu et al. [19] explained that point cloud integration in scan to BIM based digital twins enhances accuracy and coordination in project management. This research also showed that direct transfer of LiDAR data to the BIM environment saves the loss of information and accelerates the model process.
Tang et al. [20] and Valero et al. [26] emphasize the impact of environmental conditions (e.g., reflections, lighting, and moving objects) on point cloud quality in interior scans. A similar situation was observed in this study; reflections on metal surfaces and noise data from moving objects were filtered out during the data cleaning phase. This preserved the accuracy and integrity of the model.
Furthermore, a study by Roggeri et al. [27] noted that while mobile scanning systems can document interior spaces quickly, processing performance can be limited as data volume increases. Similarly, this study observed that high-resolution point cloud data increases processing time in the Revit environment.
These results, in line with the general trend in the literature, show that point cloud data provides accuracy advantage in digital twin production but requires high processing capacity [19,28].

4.3. Discussion and Commentary

This study makes a unique contribution in demonstrating the applicability of the scan-to-BIM process in an industrial building in the Turkish context. While scan-to-BIM applications in international literature are mostly focused on cultural heritage, urban planning, or building management [17,18], this study focuses directly on the creation of digital twins in production facilities. In this respect, the study aims to address the lack of implementation in Turkey regarding BIM-based digital twin production in industrial buildings.
The results demonstrate that point-cloud-based modeling not only ensures geometric accuracy but also establishes a data-driven infrastructure for processes such as maintenance, equipment planning, and capacity management. In the case study, the digital twin was used to check safety clearances around tanks and platforms, to evaluate alternative placements for new machinery within the 240 m2 hall through layout scenario testing, and to extract quantities of structural and mechanical components for renovation planning. These applications show that the digital twin transitions from a passive geometric representation into an active decision-support system [1,14].
One of the unique aspects of this study is the expansion of the digital twin model to include not only structural components but also the machinery on the factory’s production line. Manufacturing equipment was modeled as parametric components in the Revit Family environment, transforming the digital twin into an integrated structure that also represents the functional processes of the physical factory. This approach demonstrates how digital twins can be expanded to encompass not only static structural systems but also manufacturing processes. While the concept of digital twins is often associated with building performance or energy management in the literature [14,28], this study presents an example focused on industrial process modeling. In this respect, the study represents a significant step toward digital twinning of industrial facilities in the Turkish context.
However, several limitations were identified. The primary performance constraints were not caused by the 12.2 MB Revit project file but by the high-resolution point cloud dataset. The terrestrial laser scan data amounted to approximately 4.82 GB, and this large dataset significantly increased processing time and imposed hardware-related limitations. For example, although the Revit model could be opened on a workstation comparable to a Dell G3 15 (Intel i7-9750H, 16 GB RAM, NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti), navigation became less responsive when all 36 scan locations and detailed machine families were visible, due to the size and density of the point cloud. Additionally, access difficulties in densely equipped industrial spaces resulted in lower-density scans in certain areas, requiring manual interpretation during modeling. These issues highlight the need for optimization strategies such as selective point-cloud decimation, cloud-based processing, or AI-assisted segmentation in future studies [9,28].
Despite these limitations, the findings confirm that the scan-to-BIM workflow is an effective and repeatable method for digital twin production. The ReCap–Revit integration provided a reliable framework for digitizing the existing industrial facility, ensuring geometric fidelity and information continuity. The demonstrated workflow not only replicates physical geometry with an observed point-to-model deviation of approximately 8 mm but also supports data-driven decision-making, underscoring its practical value for industrial environments.

5. Conclusions

From an industry perspective, the workflow demonstrated in this study provides practical benefits for facility operators. The digital twin offers a reliable basis for maintenance planning, machinery relocation, safety assessments, and capacity expansion studies. By incorporating production-line machinery into the model, stakeholders gain a more holistic understanding of spatial constraints and workflow interactions—something rarely addressed in conventional architectural or structural digital twin studies.
This study has demonstrated the feasibility and methodological effectiveness of the scan-to-BIM approach in creating a digital twin of an existing industrial building. The integrated use of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), Autodesk ReCap, and Autodesk Revit software provided a systematic process for transforming raw point cloud data into an accurate and information-rich digital twin model. The findings demonstrate that this workflow ensures geometric accuracy, data integrity, and coordination efficiency during the modeling process.
The ReCap–Revit integration was found to minimize information loss between the scanning and modeling stages and to accelerate the modeling process by transferring LiDAR data directly to the BIM environment. Modeling the production line machines as parametric components in the Revit Family environment enabled the digital twin model to include not only structural but also functional components. Thus, the developed digital twin became an integrated structure representing not only the geometric structure of the factory but also its operational processes. This demonstrates that digital twin technology can support data-driven decision-making in processes such as maintenance, equipment planning, and capacity management.
This study also aims to fill this gap in the literature, given that scan-to-BIM and digital twin applications are still limited in the Turkish context. The field application can be considered one of the first examples of a BIM-based digital twin workflow implemented at an industrial facility scale in Turkey.
However, some limitations of the process were also observed. High-resolution point cloud data increases processing time and requires high hardware capacity. Furthermore, access difficulties in complex industrial environments lead to reduced data density in some regions. Future studies could increase the efficiency, scalability, and real-time capabilities of digital twin production by utilizing AI-supported automation, cloud-based processing, and IoT sensor data integration.
Overall, this study confirms that scan-to-BIM is an effective, repeatable, and data-driven method for digitizing existing buildings. The study provides a robust methodological framework that can contribute to the digital transformation in the construction industry by bridging the gap between physical and digital environments. The presented workflow can serve as a reference model for future digital twin implementations in industrial contexts, supporting Turkey’s ongoing digital transformation in construction.
Future work could focus on integrating real-time IoT sensor data into the digital twin to enable continuous monitoring of equipment performance and environmental conditions. Although no real-time IoT data were integrated in the current implementation, the Revit Families used for key production-line machines already include parameter fields that can serve as placeholders for future sensor IDs and measurement types, enabling a metadata structure that will support direct linkage to live monitoring systems. In addition, AI-based segmentation and automated object recognition could significantly reduce manual modeling time for large industrial facilities. Further research on cloud-based point-cloud processing and lightweight BIM representations could also improve scalability for large and complex industrial environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.H.K.; Methodology, Z.H.K.; Software, Z.H.K.; Validation, Ö.A.K.; Resources, Z.H.K.; Writing—original draft, Z.H.K. and Ö.A.K.; Visualization, Ö.A.K.; Supervision, Ö.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author (the data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a Semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for Future Research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jones, S.; Bernstein, H.M.; Laquidara-Carr, D. The Business Value of BIM for Owners; McGraw Hill Construction: Bedford, MA, USA, 2014; Available online: https://www.academia.edu/12425361/The_Business_Value_of_BIM_for_Owners (accessed on 10 October 2025).
  3. Eastman, C.; Teicholz, P.; Sacks, R.; Liston, K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sacks, R.; Eastman, C.M.; Lee, G.; Teicholz, P. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, H.; Yu, C.; Zheng, J.; Jia, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, K. Digital-Twin-Based Operation and Maintenance Management Method for Large Underground Spaces. Buildings 2024, 14, 2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Volk, R.; Stengel, J.; Schultmann, F. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Existing Buildings—Literature Review and Future Needs. Autom. Constr. 2014, 38, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bryde, D.; Broquetas, M.; Volm, J.M. The Project Benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2013, 31, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barlish, K.; Sullivan, K. How to Measure the Benefits of BIM—A Case Study Approach. Autom. Constr. 2012, 24, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tuhaise, V.V.; Tah, J.H.M.; Abanda, H. Technologies for Digital Twin Applications in Construction. Autom. Constr. 2023, 152, 104931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, W.; Lv, Y.; Wang, Q.; Sun, B.; Han, D. A Systematic Review of the Digital Twin Technology in Buildings, Landscapes, and Urban Environments. Buildings 2024, 14, 3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pan, X.; Lin, Q.; Ye, S.; Li, L.; Guo, L.; Harmon, B. Deep Learning-Based Approaches from Semantic Point Clouds to Semantic BIM Models for Heritage Digital Twin. Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Grieves, M. Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication; White Paper; Florida Institute of Technology: Melbourne, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tao, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, A.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 15, 2405–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fuller, A.; Fan, Z.; Day, C.; Barlow, C. Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 108952–108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Omrany, H.; Shokri, M.; Rahman, A.; Chong, H.Y. Developing a Framework for Digital Twin Implementation in Construction Project Management. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 68, 106226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boschert, S.; Rosen, R. Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect. In Mechatronic Futures; Hehenberger, P., Bradley, D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 59–74. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dore, C.; Murphy, M. Current State of the Art Historic Building Information Modelling. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, XLII-2/W5, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, Q.; Parlikad, A.K.; Woodall, P.; Don Ranasinghe, G.; Xie, X.; Liang, Z. Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 05020004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abreu, N.; Pinto, A.; Matos, A.; Pires, M. Procedural Point Cloud Modelling in Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM Applications: A Review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf 2023, 12, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, P.; Huber, D.; Akinci, B.; Lipman, R.; Lytle, A. Automatic Reconstruction of As-Built Building Information Models from Laser-Scanned Point Clouds: A Review of Related Techniques. Autom. Constr. 2010, 19, 829–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bosché, F.; Ahmed, M.; Turkan, Y.; Haas, C.T.; Haas, R. The Value of Integrating Scan-to-BIM and BIM-to-Field for Construction Quality Control. Autom. Constr. 2015, 49, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, R.; Wu, Y.; Jin, W.; Meng, X. Deep-Learning-Based Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation: A Survey. Electronics 2023, 12, 3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vosselman, G.; Maas, H.G. Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning; Whittles Publishing: Dunbeath, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Autodesk. Autodesk ReCap Pro User Guide; Autodesk, Inc.: San Rafael, CA, USA. Available online: https://help.autodesk.com/view/RECAP/ENU/?guid=recap_get_started (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  25. Autodesk. Autodesk Revit User Guide—Interference Check Tool; Autodesk, Inc.: San Rafael, CA, USA. Available online: https://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2025/ENU/?guid=GUID-890A9FE0-EFF4-4CFB-9E81-B0DE1A132BEC (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  26. Valero, E.; Bosché, F.; Bueno, M. Laser Scanning for BIM. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2022, 27, 454–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roggeri, A.; Vassena, G.; Fassi, F. Scan-to-BIM Efficient Approach to Extract BIM Models from High Productive Indoor Mobile Mapping Survey. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering and Computing (ISEC), Brescia, Italy, 16–18 September 2022; Gexcel: Brescia, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  28. Su, S.; Zhong, R.Y.; Jiang, Y. Digital Twin and Its Applications in the Construction Industry: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 26, 100289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The general workflow of the scan-to-BIM based digital twin creation process followed in the study.
Figure 1. The general workflow of the scan-to-BIM based digital twin creation process followed in the study.
Buildings 15 04469 g001
Figure 2. Multi-point cloud view of the exterior of the factory used in the study, aligned in the Autodesk ReCap Pro interface.
Figure 2. Multi-point cloud view of the exterior of the factory used in the study, aligned in the Autodesk ReCap Pro interface.
Buildings 15 04469 g002
Figure 3. Multi-point cloud view of the factory interior used in the study, aligned in the Autodesk ReCap Pro interface.
Figure 3. Multi-point cloud view of the factory interior used in the study, aligned in the Autodesk ReCap Pro interface.
Buildings 15 04469 g003
Figure 4. Exterior point cloud visualization using density-based coloring in Autodesk ReCap Pro.
Figure 4. Exterior point cloud visualization using density-based coloring in Autodesk ReCap Pro.
Buildings 15 04469 g004
Figure 5. Interior point cloud visualization showing high-density scanning around machinery and elevated platforms.
Figure 5. Interior point cloud visualization showing high-density scanning around machinery and elevated platforms.
Buildings 15 04469 g005
Figure 6. Normal-density RGB view of the factory interior point cloud in Autodesk ReCap Pro.
Figure 6. Normal-density RGB view of the factory interior point cloud in Autodesk ReCap Pro.
Buildings 15 04469 g006
Figure 7. BIM–point cloud overlay view showing the alignment between the parametric model and the TLS dataset.
Figure 7. BIM–point cloud overlay view showing the alignment between the parametric model and the TLS dataset.
Buildings 15 04469 g007
Figure 8. Point Cloud Data Aligned with Floor Levels in Elevation View in Revit. The letters next to the markers indicate standard Revit level/grid labels used for internal reference.
Figure 8. Point Cloud Data Aligned with Floor Levels in Elevation View in Revit. The letters next to the markers indicate standard Revit level/grid labels used for internal reference.
Buildings 15 04469 g008
Figure 9. Defining Wall Parameters in Revit.
Figure 9. Defining Wall Parameters in Revit.
Buildings 15 04469 g009
Figure 10. Final 3D digital twin model of the industrial facility generated in Autodesk Revit using LiDAR-based point cloud data. The figure illustrates the completion of the scan-to-BIM workflow.
Figure 10. Final 3D digital twin model of the industrial facility generated in Autodesk Revit using LiDAR-based point cloud data. The figure illustrates the completion of the scan-to-BIM workflow.
Buildings 15 04469 g010
Figure 11. Example accuracy check between point cloud data and modeled geometry.
Figure 11. Example accuracy check between point cloud data and modeled geometry.
Buildings 15 04469 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kandemir, Z.H.; Akboğa Kale, Ö. Building Modeling Process Using Point Cloud Data and the Digital Twin Approach: An Industrial Case Study from Turkey. Buildings 2025, 15, 4469. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244469

AMA Style

Kandemir ZH, Akboğa Kale Ö. Building Modeling Process Using Point Cloud Data and the Digital Twin Approach: An Industrial Case Study from Turkey. Buildings. 2025; 15(24):4469. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kandemir, Zeliha Hazal, and Özge Akboğa Kale. 2025. "Building Modeling Process Using Point Cloud Data and the Digital Twin Approach: An Industrial Case Study from Turkey" Buildings 15, no. 24: 4469. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244469

APA Style

Kandemir, Z. H., & Akboğa Kale, Ö. (2025). Building Modeling Process Using Point Cloud Data and the Digital Twin Approach: An Industrial Case Study from Turkey. Buildings, 15(24), 4469. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop