Next Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of Seismic Soil–Structure–Excavation Interaction in Sand
Previous Article in Journal
Brain Booster Buildings: Modelling Stairs’ Use as a Daily Booster of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of Waste Steel Fiber Usage Rate and Length Change on Some Fresh State Properties of 3D Printable Concrete Mixtures

by
Fatih Eren Akgümüş
,
Hatice Gizem Şahin
and
Ali Mardani
*
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa 16059, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(20), 3731; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203731
Submission received: 23 September 2025 / Revised: 13 October 2025 / Accepted: 15 October 2025 / Published: 16 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Printed Technology in Buildings)

Abstract

In this study, the effects of waste steel fiber and high volume blast furnace slag (BFS) substitution on rheological properties, thixotropic behavior and carbon emission were investigated in order to increase the sustainability of three-dimensional (3D) printable concrete (3DPC). Cement was replaced with BFS at 0%, 25%, 50% and 75% by volume, while waste steel fibers were added to the mixtures at three different lengths (5, 10, 15 mm) and volumetric ratios (0.5% and 1.0%). A total of 39 mixtures were optimized with respect to extrudability, buildability and shape stability criteria, and their rheological and thixotropic properties were characterized by a modified rheometer procedure. Results showed that 50% BFS substitution reduced dynamic yield stress and viscosity by 69% and 52%, respectively, and eliminated the need for a water-reducing admixture. 75% BFS substitution improved structural build-up (Athix) but required 6% silica fume. The fiber effect interacted with length and BFS content, with short fibers increasing rheological resistance, while the effect of long fibers decreased in mixtures with high BFS. The carbon emission assessment revealed that 75% BFS substitution provided an outstanding CO2 reduction of up to 71% compared to the control mix. These findings prove that high-volume BFS and waste fibers are an effective strategy to optimize rheological performance and environmental impact for sustainable 3D concrete printing.

1. Introduction

Recently, the construction industry has shown increasing interest in three-dimensional (3D) concrete printing technologies due to quests to increase production efficiency, reduce labor costs, and expand design flexibility [1,2,3]. Working on the principle of additive manufacturing, 3D printable concrete (3DPC) technology not only minimizes material waste by eliminating the need for molds but also enables the production of structural elements with complex geometric shapes [4,5].
Existing literature reveals that the performance criteria that 3DPC mixtures must meet in their fresh state differ significantly from those of conventional concretes [6,7]. These criteria include extrudability, which refers to the ability of the mixture to be extruded continuously and homogeneously in layers [8]; buildability, which is defined as the structural strength of each deposited layer to support the load of subsequent layers [9]; and form stability, which is defined as the ability of the printed element to maintain its design geometry without deterioration [10]. Meeting these fundamental requirements is directly related to the rheological properties and thixotropic behavior of the mixture. Rheological parameters play a decisive role throughout the printing process, from the mixtures flow behavior during pumping to its interlayer load-bearing capacity and shape stability [11]. Therefore, optimizing rheological and thixotropic properties is crucial for a successful 3D printing process [12,13].
Avoiding the use of coarse aggregate in the production of 3DPC mixtures is a fundamental requirement for achieving these fresh-state properties [14]. However, the lack of an aggregate skeleton necessitates the use of high amounts of binder, which leads to increased cement content [15]. High cement usage poses a significant environmental sustainability problem due to increased production costs, high energy consumption, and associated CO2 emissions. Industrial-scale adoption of 3DPC technology requires mitigating these negative environmental impacts. Therefore, reducing cement consumption and utilizing industrial waste materials is crucial for improving the economic and ecological sustainability of 3DPC mixtures [16]. Cement production is known to be a major source of global greenhouse gas emissions due to its high energy requirements and fossil fuel consumption [17]. Current literature indicates that global cement production accounts for approximately 8% of total CO2 emissions [18]. In this context, the use of industrial by-products and waste materials such as blast furnace slag (BFS) and waste steel fiber instead of cement holds significant potential for reducing the carbon footprint and supporting circular economy principles in the construction sector [19,20]. The use of these substitute materials in 3DPC mixtures can make positive contributions not only to reducing production-related CO2 emissions but also to improving mechanical performance and economic feasibility [21].
A byproduct of the iron and steel industry, BFS is a mineral additive widely used as a cement replacement due to its high calcium oxide (CaO) content [22]. Research shows that BFS can be effectively used as a replacement for Portland cement even at high substitution rates of up to 80–90% by mass [23,24]. Using BFS instead of cement significantly contributes to environmental sustainability by directly reducing carbon emissions from cement production [25].
Xu et al. [26] reported that BFS can be used in 3D-printable systems at up to 40% by weight of the binder, and that substituting 20% BFS increases the fluidity of the mixture, but that fluidity decreases at higher substitution rates. This behavior is explained by the fact that at low rates, the relatively smooth surface morphology of BFS particles reduces friction and reduces water requirements. At higher rates, the water demand increases due to the increased specific surface area, negatively affecting fluidity. In a study conducted by Yu et al. [27], it was reported that up to 10% by weight BFS substitution increased the static yield stress, but a significant decrease was observed in this value when the substitution rate was increased to 40%. The same study also emphasized that BFS substitution negatively affected the thixotropic behavior of the mixture, regardless of the usage rate. Similarly, in a study conducted by Bayat and Kashani [28], it was determined that 10% BFS substitution increased the static yield stress, but this value decreased when the substitution rate was increased to 20%. In a study conducted by Panda et al. [29], it was reported that the static yield stress increased with the replacement of cement with slag. In a study conducted by Arularasi et al. [30], in ternary blend paste mixtures (OPC + fly ash + BFS), cohesion improved with increasing BFS content, while cohesion decreased with increasing fly ash content.
Waste steel fibers, mechanically recovered from end-of-life tires, are a promising secondary raw material for developing sustainable building materials. Literature indicates that these fibers can be used as distributed reinforcement in concrete, limiting crack propagation and improving the mechanical performance of composite materials (especially tensile strength and toughness) [31,32]. The bridging effect provided by fibers in cementitious matrices has been reported to increase the material’s tensile capacity and energy absorption capacity, as well as provide crack control [33]. Fiber reinforcement is known to increase interlayer adhesion strength, particularly in 3DPC mixtures. The use of waste steel fibers in these mixtures offers both economic and environmental benefits. However, the literature frequently reports that the addition of steel fibers generally has a limiting effect on the rheological properties of fresh concrete. Arunothayan et al. [34] stated that an increase in fiber volume fraction caused an increase in both static and dynamic yield stresses, as well as an increase in apparent viscosity, which negatively affected the workability of the mixture. Alberti et al. [35] similarly showed that fiber addition reduced the fluidity of self-compacting concrete. These findings indicate that the performance advantages to be obtained from the integration of waste steel fibers into 3DPC mixtures should be evaluated by carefully managing these negative effects on rheological properties. The literature findings summarized above indicate that industrial wastes can be used to make 3DPC mixtures more sustainable, but the number of existing studies on this subject is limited. In the current study, waste steel fibers recovered from tires were used at two different volumetric fractions (0.5% and 1.0%) and three different lengths (5, 10, and 15 mm). Additionally, the effects of replacing cement with BFS at 0, 25, 50, and 75% volume were investigated. Mixing ratios were optimized based on extrudability, buildability, and shape stability criteria. The developed mixtures were comprehensively evaluated for their rheological properties, thixotropic behavior, and carbon emission potential.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

CEM I 42.5R type Portland cement (Vezirhan Cement in Bilecik/Türkiye) and blast furnace slag (BFS) were used as binders in the preparation of 3DPC mixtures. The chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of the materials used, as provided by the manufacturer, are shown in Table 1.
Some properties of the water-reducing admixture used to ensure the required workability in 3DPC mixtures, shared by the manufacturer, are shown in Table 2.
River sand with a maximum particle diameter of 2 mm (Dmax) was used as the fine aggregate. The specific gravity and water absorption capacity of the aggregate were calculated as 2.54 and 0.4%, respectively, in accordance with the EN 1097-6 Standard.
The study also used waste steel fibers recovered from end-of-life tires in three different lengths (5, 10, and 15 mm) and two different volume fractions (0.5% and 1.0%). Some properties of the fibers are given in Table 3. The scissors and cut fibers used to cut the waste fibers to the appropriate length are shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Preparation of Mixtures and Method

3DPC mixtures that met the extrudability, buildability and shape stability criteria were optimized based on the procedure suggested by Şahin et al. [36,37,38,39].
The mixture preparation process was carried out in three stages, as schematically illustrated in Figure 2. In the first stage, Portland cement, BFC, aggregate, and waste steel fibers were dry mixed for 30 s at 62.5 rpm. In the second stage, water and, if necessary, a water-reducing admixture were added, and the mixing process continued for 1 min at 62.5 rpm. In the final stage, the mixture was mixed for 2 min at 125 rpm to achieve a homogeneous structure, and the pressing process was then initiated. The mixtures were printed immediately after preparation. The printing speed is 16 mm/s.

2.2.1. Rheological Measurements

Rheological measurements of the mixtures were taken immediately after production using an MCR52 (Anton Paar) type rotational rheometer (Anton Paar GmbH in Graz, Austria) with an 8 mm ball diameter. To determine the rheological parameters, a modified measurement protocol consisting of 7 periods, whose flow chart is given in Figure 3, was applied. This protocol was developed by modifying the methods proposed by Mardani-Aghabaglou [40] and Yao et al. [41] to better characterize the structural recovery behavior of 3DPC. This rheological measurement method is based on previous experience of the researchers [36,37,38,39].
The rheological measurement protocol consists of the following steps:
Period 1 (Shear History Removal): To remove past shear stress (shear history) generated during mixing in the mixer, measurements were taken for 30 s at a constant strain rate of 5 s−1.
Period 2 (Rise Curve): To establish the rise portion of the yield curve, the deformation rate was linearly increased from 0 to 30 s−1 over 150 s, and data were recorded at 5 s intervals.
Period 3 (Descent Curve): To establish the fall portion of the yield curve, the deformation rate was linearly decreased from 30 to 0 s−1 over 150 s, and data were recorded at 5 s intervals. The dynamic yield stress and apparent viscosity values of the 3DPC mixtures were calculated by fitting the raw data obtained from this period to the Herschel-Bulkley model shown in Equation (1).
Period 4 (Resting-Structural Recovery): The sample was held for 30 s without any deformation to allow for structural recovery before static measurement.
Period 5 (Initial Static Measurement): To measure the initial static yield stress of the material, measurements were taken at a constant, low strain rate of 0.02 s−1 for 30 s (at 2-s intervals, a total of 15 measurements).
Period 6 (Structural Recovery): To measure the thixotropic structural recovery rate of the mixtures, the sample was held for 480 s without any deformation.
Period 7 (Final Static Measurement): To measure the static yield stress at the end of the holding period, measurements were taken again at a constant strain rate of 0.02 s−1 for 30 s (at 2-s intervals, a total of 15 measurements).
The obtained yield curve data were analyzed using the Herschel-Bulkley model Equation (1) and the dynamic yield stress and viscosity values were calculated.
τ = τ0 + b(γ˙)p
where, τ = Shear stress (Pa), τ0 = yield stress (Pa), b = Herschel-Bulkley consistency coefficient, γ˙ = Deformation rate (s−1) and p = Herschel-Bulkley index.

2.2.2. Thixotropic Measurements

The thixotropic behavior of the mixtures was quantitatively evaluated using three different methods to reflect both dynamic and static properties:
  • Dynamic Structural Build-up (D-SBU): This approach, proposed by Zhang et al. [42], was calculated using data obtained from dynamic measurements Equation (2). This method represents the structural state of the material after the dynamic shear history.
    D S B U = τ 3 . p τ 2 . p
    Here, τ3.p represents the dynamic yield stress (Pa) obtained from the 3rd period (descent curve) and τ2.p from the 2nd period (ascent curve).
  • Structural Build-Up Development (Athix): Calculated with data obtained from static measurements to characterize the rate of structural strength increase observed during a given rest period Equation (3).
    A t h i x = τ s , f τ s , i t d
    Here, Athix represents the structural build-up development (Pa/s), τ(s,f) represents the static yield stress value (Pa) obtained from the 7th period, τ(s,i) represents the static yield stress value (Pa) obtained from the 5th period, and td represents the waiting time (s).
  • Thixotropic Index (Ithix): The method proposed by Qian and Kawashima [43] was used to characterize the time-dependent behavior of shear stress under a constant deformation rate Equation (4). This index represents the ratio of the maximum shear stress required to initiate flow to the shear stress in steady-state flow.
    I t h i x = τ i τ e
    Here, Ithix represents the thixotropic index, τi represents the shear stress (Pa) required to initiate flow, and τe represents the steady-state flow shear stress (Pa).

2.2.3. Carbon Emission Assessment

The carbon footprint of the mixtures produced within the scope of the study was calculated by considering the embodied carbon values per unit weight (kgCO2/kg) of each component. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using a range of the lowest and highest values reported in the literature for carbon emission calculations. The embodied carbon value ranges used and the relevant references are provided in Table 4. Total carbon emissions per 1 m3 of concrete were calculated using wet mix ratios and Equation (5).
c o 2 = Σ i = 1 n ( W i x c o 2 i ε )
Here, CO2 is the total embodied CO2 value of 1 m3 of concrete. Its unit is kgCO2/m3. n is the total raw material in the mix. Wi is the total amount of material (in kg) required to produce 1 m3 of concrete. CO2i−e is the equivalent CO2 value of material i (in kg CO2/kg).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mixing Ratios

Within the scope of the study, optimum 3DPC mixtures were developed that met printability criteria (extrudability, buildability, and shape stability) for each substitution level using 0, 25, 50, and 75% of the cement volume. The water/binder ratio (by volume) was kept constant at 0.40 in all mixes, and a total of 39 different mixes were formulated by varying the sand/binder ratio, aggregate amount, fiber parameters (length and volume ratio), and superplasticizer dosage. Table 5 summarizes the material quantities used for 1 m3 of mix and the printability performance of each mix.
Two requirements for print quality have been proposed: extrudability and buildability. All of these requirements must be met by a mixture with acceptable print quality. After the print quality assessment, the shape stability of the accepted mixture should be evaluated using Equation (6). It has been reported that a 3DPC mixture is acceptable in terms of shape stability if this value is greater than 95% [37].
S S   % = b l a y e r b n o z z l e · 100
According to Table 5, printability criteria are shown as 1 if suitable and 0 if not suitable.
The naming of the mixtures was based on the BFS substitution rate, fiber volume fraction, and fiber length. For example, the blend without BFS (Control), with 0.5% fiber content and 5 mm fiber length was named K-0.5-0.5, while the blend with 25% BFS, 1% fiber content, and 15 mm fiber length was named 25-1-1.5.
Control Series (0% BFS) Optimization:
The optimization process began with a reference control mix (Mix No. 1) containing 5 kg/m3 of water-reducing admixture and river sand with a maximum grain diameter of 2 mm. Although this mix met the extrudability criteria, it failed to meet the buildability criteria due to excessive fluidity. Reducing the water-reducing admixture dosage to 3 kg/m3 (Mix No. 2) improved extrudability and buildability, but the shape stability criteria were not met due to the spreading of the substrate during the printing of the second layer. Finally, reducing the dosage to 2 kg/m3 (Mix No. 3) resulted in the optimum control mix that met all printability criteria (Figure 4).
As reported in the literature [53,54,55], it was observed that the addition of fibers (Mix No. 4–9) did not lead to any change in the water-reducing admixture requirement due to the negligible water absorption capacity of waste steel fibers. Indeed, at each BFC substitution level, the mixtures with fiber addition could be successfully printed at the same additive dosage as the optimum mixture without fibers.
Optimization of the 25% BFS Substitution Series:
In this series, the same water-reducing admixture dosage (2 kg/m3, Mix No. 10) as in the optimal control mixture was insufficient to ensure constructability. Reducing the dosage to 1.8 kg/m3 (Mix No. 11) maintained extrudability but still failed to ensure buildability. Reducing the dosage to 1.65 kg/m3 (Mix No. 12) improved buildability, but this time, shape stability was not achieved due to the spreading of the lower layers as the upper layers were compressed (similar behavior to Figure 5). Reducing the dosage to 1.5 kg/m3 (Mix No. 13) achieved the optimal fiber-free formulation at this level. This optimum dosage (1.5 kg/m3) has also been used successfully in all 25% BFS series mixtures containing fiber (Mix No. 14–19) (Figure 6).
Optimization of the 50% BFS Substitution Series:
In this series, water-reducing admixture dosages of 1.5 kg/m3 (Mix No. 20—Figure 7) and 1.0 kg/m3 (Mix No. 21) were insufficient to ensure buildability. Reducing the dosage to 0.5 kg/m3 (Mix No. 22) improved extrudability and buildability, but problems with shape stability were observed. The mixture prepared without water-reducing admixture (0 kg/m3, Mix No. 23) yielded optimal results and successfully met all printability criteria (Figure 8). This optimum dosage (0 kg/m3) was also used in all 50% BFS series mixtures containing fiber (Mix Nos. 24–29).
Optimization of the 75% BFS Substitution Series:
This series presented an additional challenge in the mix design. The mix without any additives (Mix No. 30) failed to achieve buildability. The addition of silica fume (SF) was necessary to improve workability, but the mix containing 9% SF by volume (Mix No. 31) became unextrudable due to its excessive cohesiveness (Figure 9). Reducing the SF ratio to 3% (Mix No. 32) made the mix excessively fluid again, and the buildability parameter was not met. Finally, adjusting the SF ratio to 6% (Mix No. 33) achieved the optimum fiber-free balance for this level, ensuring the mix met all criteria. This optimum mix (175.2 kg/m3 Cement, 395 kg/m3 BFS, 28.9 kg/m3 SF, 0 kg/m3 water reducing admixture) formed the basis of all 75% BFS series mixes (Mix No. 34–39) containing fiber (Figure 10).
The findings indicate that as the BFS replacement ratio increases, the water reducer requirement of the mixture decreases significantly. No admixture was required at the 50% replacement level, while SF was required to control fluidity at the 75% replacement level. This observation is consistent with the findings of Özbay et al. [56], who explained the performance of BFS through three main mechanisms. Compared to Portland cement, its lower hydration reactivity improves workability and open time by reducing early-age heat release and water loss [57]. A more spherical and smooth particle morphology improves fluidity by reducing intra-matrix friction and minimizes the need for a lubricant [58]. Its specific surface area (4950 cm2/g), higher than that of cement (3441 cm2/g), increases the adsorption and dispersion efficiency of polycarboxylate ether-based water-reducing admixtures, enabling effective results with lower dosages [38].
The addition of 6% silica fume (SF) was critical to offset the potential overflow tendency of high substitution rates in mixtures containing 75% BFS and to ensure rapid structural build-up after extrusion. The extremely high surface area of SF (~20,000 m2/kg) is known to enhance particle interactions and thixotropic behavior, while also improving shape stability by precisely modulating the viscosity of the paste phase [38]. This combined effect allowed for high printability with controlled rheological performance.

3.2. Rheological Properties and Thixotropic Behavior of 3DPC Mixtures

3.2.1. Rheological Properties

In this study, the rheological behavior of 3DPC mixtures with different compositions was comprehensively examined in terms of dynamic yield stress and plastic viscosity (Table 6). In fiber-free mixtures, BFS replacement exhibited a clear moderating effect on rheological properties. As summarized in Figure 11, the addition of BFS led to statistically significant decreases in dynamic yield stress and plastic viscosity. A 25% BFS replacement produced reductions of 50% and 23%, respectively, in these rheological parameters, while at a 50% replacement the reductions reached 69% and 52%. This behavior can be primarily attributed to the lower hydration reactivity and more spherical morphology of BFS particles compared with cement. Lower reactivity reduces hydration heat and the associated water loss, whereas the spherical morphology minimizes interparticle friction, thereby enhancing the mixture’s flow potential (rheological performance) [57]. Johari et al. [59] likewise confirmed that BFS contents up to 60% markedly improve the workability of cementitious systems. This improvement has been ascribed to better particle-size distribution, smooth surface morphology, and the low water-absorption capacity of BFS [56,60]. De Belie et al. [61] also reported that BFS use improves mixture flowability and substantially reduces the dosage of water-reducing admixture required to achieve the target spread. Salleh et al. [62] indicate that, in 3DPC mixtures reported in the literature, a 30–40% BFS replacement is recommended to balance optimal workability and mechanical performance. Park et al. [57] found that BFS contents up to 30% significantly increased flowability, attributing this effect to the spherical particle morphology and low hydration reactivity of BFS. The ability of BFS particles to fill the voids formed by cement particles and to reduce interparticle friction contributes to the high flowability of the cement–BFS system. However, higher replacement ratios (50% and above) can lead to lower hydraulic activity, which may adversely affect workability at high replacement levels, as noted by researchers.
To clearly elucidate the effects of waste steel fiber use and fiber length on the rheological properties of 3DPC mixtures, each BFS series was evaluated separately.
In the control series (0% BFS), examining the influence of fiber addition and length showed that using 5 mm fibers at 0.5% by volume increased dynamic yield stress and viscosity by 54% and 41%, respectively. When the fiber dosage was raised to 1%, these increases reached 88% and 45%, respectively. Using 10 mm fibers at 0.5% and 1% led to 32% and 35% decreases in dynamic yield stress, along with an 8% increase and a 16% decrease in viscosity, respectively. For 15 mm fibers, dosages of 0.5% and 1% produced 18% and 19% reductions in dynamic yield stress, and a 16% increase in viscosity in both cases.
In the 25% BFS series, 5 mm fibers at 0.5% yielded 34% and 43% increases in dynamic yield stress and viscosity, respectively, whereas at 1% these increases fell to 20% and 34%. For 10 mm fibers, 0.5% and 1% dosages produced 9% and 92% increases in yield stress and 13% and 44% increases in viscosity, respectively. With 15 mm fibers at 0.5% and 1%, dynamic yield stress changed by −14% and −12%, while viscosity changed by −27% and +2%, respectively, in 3DPC mixtures.
In the 50% BFS series, 5 mm fibers at 0.5% caused striking increases of 199% in yield stress and 118% in viscosity; at 1% the corresponding increases were 186% and 106%. With 10 mm fibers at 0.5% and 1%, yield stress rose by 211% and 57% and viscosity by 134% and 82%, respectively. For 15 mm fibers at the same dosages, yield stress rose by 71% and 64% and viscosity by 27% and 19%, respectively.
In the 75% BFS series, 5 mm fibers at 0.5% increased yield stress and viscosity by 42% and 97%, respectively; at 1% they led to a 21% decrease in yield stress and an 18% increase in viscosity. For 10 mm fibers, 0.5% and 1% dosages resulted in an 18% decrease and an 84% increase in yield stress, and 72% and 102% increases in viscosity, respectively. With 15 mm fibers, yield stress decreased by 9% and 8%, while viscosity increased by 18% and 79%, for 0.5% and 1% dosages, respectively.
Overall, the influence of fiber dosage on rheological properties depends on fiber length. In mixtures with low BFS contents and short fibers, increasing the fiber fraction generally increased dynamic yield stress and viscosity. This finding aligns with Doğruyol et al. [63], who observed that higher contents of waste steel fibers reduce homogeneity and workability in concrete. Similarly, Mohammad et al. [64] reported that increasing fiber content adversely affects mixture flowability, with restrictions on flow growing as total fiber content rises, thereby reducing workability; Figueiredo et al. [65] reported parallel results. Şahin et al. [38] also confirmed that increasing fiber content up to 0.4% elevates dynamic yield stress and viscosity, attributing this to the increase in total surface area with fiber addition [66,67], and similar statements were made by Wang et al. [68]. Conversely, Figueiredo et al. [65] proposed that fibers can reduce flow performance by constraining the relative mobility of aggregate particles due to dimensional incompatibility between fibers and aggregates. In 3DPC mixtures with 6 mm polypropylene fibers, Ma et al. [69] found that dynamic yield stress and viscosity increased with fiber dosage, explaining this by the tendency of PP fibers to bend and form clumps that impair flow; Wang et al. [68] reported similar outcomes.
However, in mixtures with longer fibers (10–15 mm), increasing fiber dosage led to decreases in dynamic yield stress and viscosity, an effect that became more pronounced at higher BFS contents. This reduction with higher fiber dosages is thought to stem from alignment of the longer fibers with the flow direction under high fiber contents. A related study by Ma et al. [69] on 3DPC mixtures examined the relationship between the dosage of 6 mm PP fibers and fiber alignment, showing that alignment becomes more dominant as the fiber content increases. By contrast, Gueciouer et al. [70] emphasized that while fiber use affects yield stress, it does not exert a notable effect on viscosity.

3.2.2. Thixotropic Behavior

This study evaluated the thixotropic properties of 3DPC mixtures using three different methods that characterize both dynamic and static behavior (D-SBU, Athix, and Ithix), with the results summarized in Table 7. Independent of fiber parameters, the effect of BFS replacement on thixotropy is shown in Figure 12. In parallel with the rheological properties, compared with the control mix, 25% and 50% BFS replacement generally led to decreases in dynamic structural build-up (D-SBU) and the structural build-up rate (Athix). This decrease can be explained by the relatively lower hydration reactivity of BFS compared with Portland cement, reduced water loss due to lower heat of hydration, and the smoother morphology of slag particles retaining less water during mixing. In contrast, mixtures containing 75% BFS exhibited a marked improvement in structural build-up. This unexpected increase is attributed to the addition of 6% silica fume by volume in this series to satisfy printability criteria. Bayat and Kashani [28] reported that high specific surface area supports structural build-up by increasing water demand and mixture cohesion. This finding is consistent with results reported by Grist et al. [71] and Jiao et al. [72]. The addition of silica fume contributes to a more cohesive concrete and increases rheological resistance via enhanced internal surface forces [61]. Srinivas et al. [73] confirmed that a 10% silica fume replacement significantly increases static yield stress—and thus buildability—without materially compromising extrudability. The literature further shows that concretes containing silica fume are more viscous and more resistant to segregation even at high flow levels, a property that is critical for layer-by-layer manufacturing. Inozemtcev et al. [74] noted that silica fume not only significantly increases compressive strength and ultimate deformation capacity but also affords superior pumpability. In 3D-printable geopolymers, Chen et al. [75] found that a 10% silica fume content improved structural build-up rates during flocculation and polycondensation. Geng et al. [76] reported that increasing silica fume content (≤12%) enhanced initial yield stress and thixotropic behavior and, provided it did not induce excessively high yield stress, significantly increased interlayer bond strength (from 69.7% to 112.3%). However, when yield stress becomes too high, further increases in silica fume content can reduce bond strength. In the present study, D-SBU and Athix exhibited similar trends; however, the Ithix method was concluded to be unsuitable for evaluating the thixotropic behavior of 3DPC mixtures.
Examining the effect of waste steel fiber addition on thixotropy shows that, with short fibers (5 mm), increasing the fiber volume fraction generally led to decreases in thixotropic metrics (Athix). This aligns with Şahin et al. [37], who reported that Athix declines as fiber content increases. By contrast, for mixtures containing longer fibers (10 and 15 mm), no clear and consistent effect of fiber dosage on thixotropic properties was identified. Comparing different fiber lengths at the same fiber content, the highest D-SBU and Athix values were generally obtained in mixtures with 5 mm fibers. As an overall trend, structural build-up decreased with increasing fiber length, with negative Athix values observed—indicating structural degradation—particularly in mixtures 75-1-1 and 75-0.5-1.5. This suggests that in matrices with high BFS and silica fume contents, longer fibers may operate via a mechanism that delays or impedes the re-formation of the rheological network.

3.3. Carbon Emissions Assessment

The carbon emission values of the mixtures produced in this study were calculated by considering the embodied carbon of each constituent per unit mass and are presented in Figure 13. As expected, the highest carbon emissions (703 kg CO2/m3) were observed for mixtures K-1-0.5, K-1-1, and K-1-1.5, which contain the highest cement content and the maximum waste steel fiber dosage. This outcome is attributable to cement being the component that contributes most to the concrete’s carbon footprint [77].
To more clearly reveal the dominant role of cement in emissions, the control mix (K) was compared with mixtures incorporating 25%, 50%, and 75% blast furnace slag (BFS) replacement. As is well known, BFS is one of the widely used supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in concrete technology [78]. Examining the effect of BFS replacement on carbon emissions (Figure 14) shows that 25%, 50%, and 75% replacement levels produced emission reductions of 23%, 47%, and 71%, respectively. The primary reason is the reduction in cement—which has high embodied carbon—and its substitution by BFS, an industrial by-product requiring minimal processing and possessing a very low embodied carbon (0.00–0.07 kgCO2/kg). Cement-related emissions mainly arise from limestone calcination and kiln heating [79]. Accordingly, among all mixtures produced in this study, the lowest carbon emission (179 kgCO2/m3) belongs to the mixture without fibers and with 75% BFS.
Assessing the effect of waste steel fibers on emissions shows that, in the control series, increasing fiber dosage led to a 6–12% rise in emissions. In BFS-containing series, this increase became more pronounced: for mixtures with 25%, 50%, and 75% BFS, increasing fiber dosage raised emissions by 8–16%, 11–23%, and 21–43%, respectively. This rise stems from the relatively high embodied carbon of waste steel fibers (0.43–1.59 kgCO2/kg). Roshan et al. [80] noted that the global annual production of 0.3 million tons of steel fibers entails substantial fossil-fuel consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions; however, the same study emphasized that using waste-derived steel fibers can be a viable strategy to reduce the carbon footprint without sacrificing mechanical performance. The present results likewise highlight the environmental benefit of fiber recovery while indicating that, particularly at high dosages, there remains an embodied-carbon cost.
The values indicated by squares in Figure 13 represent average measurements. Maximum and minimum values are marked with error bars. Additionally, the Standard Deviation and Coefficient of Variation are given in Table 8.

4. Conclusions

Based on the materials used and the experiments conducted in this study, the following findings were obtained:
  • 25% and 50% BFS replacement led to substantial reductions in dynamic yield stress and viscosity relative to the control mix—by 50%/23% and 69%/52%, respectively.
  • The effect of waste steel fibers on rheology exhibited a complex interaction with fiber length and BFS content. In mixtures with low BFS contents, short fibers (5 mm) increased rheological resistance as fiber dosage rose, whereas in the presence of longer fibers (10–15 mm) and higher BFS contents, this effect diminished or reversed.
  • Thixotropic behavior followed trends similar to rheology. While 25% and 50% BFS reduced structural build-up (D-SBU and Athix), 75% BFS together with silica fume markedly improved it. The high specific surface area of silica fume is considered to enhance cohesion and structural build-up, underpinning this positive effect.
  • BFS replacement noticeably reduced water-reducing admixture demand. Owing to increased flowability up to 50% BFS, the admixture dosage decreased, and the 50% BFS mixture achieved optimal properties without any admixture. At 75% BFS, silica fume addition was required to maintain workability. Waste steel fibers did not change the admixture demand needed to satisfy printability criteria.
  • BFS replacement demonstrated exceptional potential for environmental sustainability. 25%, 50%, and 75% BFS provided carbon-emission reductions of 23%, 47%, and 71%, respectively. The lowest footprint in the study (179 kgCO2/m3) was obtained for the fiber-free mixture with 75% BFS. Although waste steel fibers offer mechanical benefits, their relatively high embodied carbon led to emission increases between 6% and 43% as fiber dosage rose.
  • In this study, the effects of using 0, 25, 50 and 75% BFS by volume and different lengths (5, 10 and 15 mm) of waste steel fibers on the performance of 3DPC mixtures were investigated. The findings of this study depend on the material properties and application method used.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.E.A., H.G.Ş. and A.M.; Methodology, F.E.A., H.G.Ş. and A.M.; Investigation, F.E.A., H.G.Ş. and A.M.; Writing—original draft, F.E.A. and H.G.Ş.; Writing—review & editing, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Bursa Uludağ University Science and Technology Centre (BAP) under grant number FGA-2025-2048.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey for supporting project number 124M212, the Bursa Uludağ University Science and Technology Center (BAP) for supporting projects number FYL-2025-2130 and FDK-2024-1959. The first author would like to thank the TUBITAK 2210-A program, the second author the TUBITAK 2211-A program, and the third author the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Van Tittelboom, K.; Mohan, M.K.; Šavija, B.; Keita, E.; Ma, G.; Du, H.; Kruger, J.; Caneda-Martinez, L.; Wang, L.; Bekaert, M.; et al. On the micro-and meso-structure and durability of 3D printed concrete elements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2024, 185, 107649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tu, H.; Wei, Z.; Bahrami, A.; Kahla, N.B.; Ahmad, A.; Özkılıç, Y.O. Recent advancements and future trends in 3D concrete printing using waste materials. Dev. Built Environ. 2023, 16, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmed, G.H. A review of “3D concrete printing”: Materials and process characterization, economic considerations and environmental sustainability. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 66, 105863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Heywood, K.; Nicholas, P. Sustainability and 3D concrete printing: Identifying a need for a more holistic approach to assessing environmental impacts. Archit. Intell. 2023, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, N.; Puttappa, S.; Ashwath, R.; Ali, H. Sustainable non-conventional concrete 3D printing—A review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rehman, A.U.; Kim, J.-H. 3D concrete printing: A systematic review of rheology, mix designs, mechanical, microstructural, and durability characteristics. Materials 2021, 14, 3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Si, W.; Khan, M.; McNally, C. A Comprehensive Review of Rheological Dynamics and Process Parameters in 3D Concrete Printing. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhi, P.; Wu, Y.C.; Yang, Q.; Kong, X.; Xiao, J. Effect of spiral blade geometry on 3D-printed concrete rheological properties and extrudability using discrete element modeling. Autom. Constr. 2022, 137, 104199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Schlangen, E.; Šavija, B. A review of methods on buildability quantification of extrusion-based 3D concrete printing: From analytical modelling to numerical simulation. Dev. Built Environ. 2023, 16, 100241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mishra, S.K.; Perera, B.J.C.; Kumar, N. A review on 3D concrete printing processes, materials, and lifecycle considerations. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 356, 129001. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao, H.; Jin, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liu, X.; Yu, Q. Rheological behavior of 3D printed concrete: Influential factors and printability prediction scheme. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 91, 109626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Panda, B.; Noor Mohamed, N.A.; Paul, S.C.; Bhagath Singh, G.V.P.; Tan, M.J.; Šavija, B. The effect of material fresh properties and process parameters on buildability and interlayer adhesion of 3D printed concrete. Materials 2019, 12, 2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rahman, M.; Rawat, S.; Yang, R.C.; Mahil, A.; Zhang, Y.X. A comprehensive review on fresh and rheological properties of 3D printable cementitious composites. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 91, 109719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Girskas, G.; Kligys, M. 3D Concrete Printing Review: Equipment, Materials, Mix Design, and Properties. Buildings 2025, 15, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, Y.; Sheng, R.; Yao, X.; Pichler, B.; Mang, H.A.; Zhang, J.L. A three-step development strategy for 3D printable concrete containing coarse aggregates. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 22, e04540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Murali, G.; Wong, L.S. Waste-driven construction: A state-of-the-art review on the integration of waste in 3D printed concrete in recent researches for sustainable development. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 98, 111268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kaya, Y.; Kobya, V.; Mardani, A.; Mardani, N.; Beytekin, H.E. Effect of grinding conditions on clinker grinding efficiency: Ball size, mill rotation speed, and feed rate. Buildings 2024, 14, 2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, D.; Reiner, D.M.; Yang, F.; Cui, C.; Meng, J.; Shan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tao, S.; Guan, D. Projecting future carbon emissions from cement production in developing countries. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bayqra, S.H.; Mardani-Aghabaglou, A.; Ramyar, K. Physical and mechanical properties of high volume fly ash roller compacted concrete pavement (A laboratory and case study). Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 314, 125664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yiğit, B.; Salihoğlu, G.; Mardani-Aghabaglou, A.; Salihoğlu, N.K.; Özen, S. Recycling of sewage sludge incineration ashes as construction material. J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ. 2020, 35, 1647–1664. [Google Scholar]
  21. Şahin, H.G.; Mardani, A. Mechanical properties, durability performance and interlayer adhesion of 3DPC mixtures: A state-of-the-art review. Struct. Concr. 2023, 24, 5481–5505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ulubeyli, G.C.; Artir, R. Properties of hardened concrete produced by waste marble powder. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 2181–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tsai, C.J.; Huang, R.; Lin, W.T.; Wang, H.N. Mechanical and cementitious characteristics of ground granulated blast furnace slag and basic oxygen furnace slag blended mortar. Mater. Des. 2014, 60, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gholampour, A.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. Performance of sustainable concretes containing very high volume Class-F fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 1407–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McLellan, B.C.; Williams, R.P.; Lay, J.; Van Riessen, A.; Corder, G.D. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, H.; Sun, X.; Zhao, K.; Wang, Y. Effect of FA and GGBFS on compressive strength, rheology, and printing properties of cement-based 3D printing material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 339, 127685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, Q.; Zhu, B.; Li, X.; Meng, L.; Cai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, J. Investigation of the rheological and mechanical properties of 3D printed eco-friendly concrete with steel slag. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 72, 106621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bayat, H.; Kashani, A. Analysis of rheological properties and printability of a 3D-printing mortar containing silica fume, hydrated lime, and blast furnace slag. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 37, 107128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Panda, B.; Tan, M.J. Material properties of 3D printable high-volume slag cement. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on 3D Construction Printing (3DcP) in Conjunction with the 6th International Conference on Innovative Production and Construction (IPC 2018), Melbourne, Australia, 26–28 November 2018; pp. 26–28. [Google Scholar]
  30. Arularasi, V.; Thamilselvi, P.; Avudaiappan, S.; Saavedra Flores, E.I.; Amran, M.; Fediuk, R.; Vatin, N.; Karelina, M. Rheological behavior and strength characteristics of cement paste and mortar with fly ash and GGBS admixtures. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zheng, Z.; Feldman, D. Synthetic fibre-reinforced concrete. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1995, 20, 185–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thomas, J.; Ramaswamy, A. Mechanical properties of steel fibre-reinforced concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2007, 19, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Soutsos, M.N.; Le, T.T.; Lampropoulos, A.P. Flexural performance of fibre reinforced concrete made with steel and synthetic fibres. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arunothayan, A.R.; Nematollahi, B.; Khayat, K.; Ramesh, A.; Sanjayan, J.G. Rheological Characterization of Ultra-High Performance Concrete for 3D Printing. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 136, 104854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alberti, M.G.; Enfedaque, A.; Gálvez, J.C. The effect of fibres in the rheology of self-compacting concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 219, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Şahin, H.G.; Akarsu Özenç, A.; Saka Dinç, Z.; Mardani, A.; Eren, S. Investigation of fresh and hardened properties of 3D printable concrete containing ozone-modified carbon fiber. J. Sustain. Cem.-Based Mater. 2025, 14, 534–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Şahin, H.G.; Akgümüş, F.E.; Mardani, A. Mechanical and rheological properties of fiber-reinforced 3D printable concrete; in terms of fiber content and aspect ratio. Struct. Concr. 2024, 26, 1597–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Şahin, H.G.; Mardani, A.; Beytekin, H.E. Effect of silica fume utilization on structural build-up, mechanical and dimensional stability performance of fiber-reinforced 3D printable concrete. Polymers 2024, 16, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Şahin, H.G.; Mardani, A.; Mardani, N. Performance requirements and optimum mix proportion of high-volume fly ash 3D printable concrete. Buildings 2024, 14, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mardani-Aghabaglou, A. Investigation of Cement-Superplasticizer Admixture Compatibility. Ph.D. Thesis, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yao, H.; Xie, Z.; Li, Z.; Huang, C.; Yuan, Q.; Zheng, X. The relationship between the rheological behavior and interlayer bonding properties of 3D printing cementitious materials with the addition of attapulgite. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 316, 125809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Q.; Huang, T. Effects of redispersible polymer powders on the structural build-up of 3D printing cement paste with and without hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 267, 120551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qian, Y.; Kawashima, S. Distinguishing dynamic and static yield stress of fresh cement mortars through thixotropy. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 86, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thilakarathna, P.S.M.; Seo, S.; Baduge, K.K.; Lee, H.; Mendis, P.; Foliente, G. Embodied carbon analysis and benchmarking emissions of high and ultra-high strength concrete using machine learning algorithms. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, W.; Zhang, D.; Ftwi, E.; Ellis, B.R.; Li, V.C. Development of sustainable low carbon Engineered Cementitious Composites with waste polyethylene fiber, sisal fiber and carbonation curing. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 197, 107096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohanty, I.; Saha, P.; Patra, S.R.; Jha, S.K. Waste to valuable resource: Application of copper slag and steel slag in concrete with reduced carbon dioxide emissions. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2023, 8, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hammond, G.; Jones, C. Inventory of Carbon Energy: ICE; Sustainable Energy Research Team, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath: Bath, UK, 2008; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuruşcu, A.O.; Girgin, Z.C. Efficiency of structural materials in sustainable design. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 2014, 8, 1260–1265. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang, K.H.; Song, J.K.; Song, K.I. Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 39, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gan, V.J.; Cheng, J.C.; Lo, I.M. A comprehensive approach to mitigation of embodied carbon in reinforced concrete buildings. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 582–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Asare, G.O.; Barnett, S.; Awinda, K.; Martinson, B. Life cycle assessment of steel fibre-reinforced concrete beams. Cogent Eng. 2024, 11, 2374942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Flower, D.J.; Sanjayan, J.G. Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2007, 12, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jia, Z.; Zhou, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Ma, L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y. Effect of steel fiber shape and content on printability, microstructure and mechanical properties of 3D printable high strength cementitious materials. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 20, e03080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pham, L.; Tran, P.; Sanjayan, J. Steel fibres reinforced 3D printed concrete: Influence of fibre sizes on mechanical performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 250, 118785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Singh, A.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, J.; Lyu, Q. Mechanical and macrostructural properties of 3D printed concrete dosed with steel fibers under different loading direction. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 323, 126616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Özbay, E.; Erdemir, M.; Durmuş, H.İ. Utilization and efficiency of ground granulated blast furnace slag on concrete properties–A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 105, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Park, C.K.; Noh, M.H.; Park, T.H. Rheological properties of cementitious materials containing mineral admixtures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 842–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. He, T.; Li, Z.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, X.; Qu, X. Study on the particle morphology, powder characteristics and hydration activity of blast furnace slag prepared by different grinding methods. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 270, 121445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Johari, M.M.; Brooks, J.J.; Kabir, S.; Rivard, P. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on engineering properties of high strength concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 2639–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. ACI. Slag Cement in Concrete and Mortar; 233 R03; ACI: Detroit, MI, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  61. De Belie, N.; Soutsos, M.; Gruyaert, E. Properties of Fresh and Hardened Concrete Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 25. [Google Scholar]
  62. Salleh, N.; Jamalulail, N.S.; Hamid, N.A.A.; Jamellodin, Z.; Majid, M.A.; Suliman, N.H. New technology in 3D concrete printing by using ground granulated blast-furnace slag: A review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1200, 12007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Doğruyol, M.; Ayhan, E.; Karaşin, A. Effect of waste steel fiber use on concrete behavior at high temperature. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 20, e03051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mohammad, S.A.; Krishna, T.N.C.; Saketh, T.; Ganesh, C.Y.; Sathyan, D. Fresh and hardened state properties of waste tire fiber and steel fiber reinforced concrete. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 80, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Figueiredo, A.D.D.; Ceccato, M.R. Workability analysis of steel fiber reinforced concrete using slump and Ve-Be test. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. El-Dieb, A.S.; Taha, M.R. Flow characteristics and acceptance criteria of fiber-reinforced self-compacted concrete (FR-SCC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 27, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Centonze, G.; Leone, M.; Micelli, F.; Colonna, D.; Aiello, M.A. Concrete reinforced with recycled steel fibers from end of life tires: Mix-design and application. Key Eng. Mater. 2016, 711, 224–231. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang, W.; Shen, A.; Lyu, Z.; He, Z.; Nguyen, K.T. Fresh and rheological characteristics of fiber reinforced concrete—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 296, 123734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ma, L.; Zhang, Q.; Lombois-Burger, H.; Jia, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Niu, G.; Zhang, Y. Pore structure, internal relative humidity, and fiber orientation of 3D printed concrete with polypropylene fiber and their relation with shrinkage. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 61, 105250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gueciouer, D.; Youcef, G.; Tarek, N. Rheological and mechanical optimization of a steel fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete using the design of experiments method. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2022, 26, 1097–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Grist, E.R.; Paine, K.A.; Heath, A.; Norman, J.; Pinder, H. Compressive strength development of binary and ternary lime–pozzolan mortars. Mater. Des. 2013, 52, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jiao, D.; Shi, C.; Yuan, Q.; An, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, H. Effect of constituents on rheological properties of fresh concrete—A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 83, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Srinivas, D.; Dey, D.; Panda, B.; Sitharam, T.G. Printability, Thermal and Compressive Strength Properties of Cementitious Materials: A Comparative Study with Silica Fume and Limestone. Materials 2022, 15, 8607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Inozemtcev, A.; Korolev, E.; Qui, D.T. Study of mineral additives for cement materials for 3D-printing in construction. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 365, 32009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Banthia, N. Unraveling pore structure alternations in 3D-printed geopolymer concrete and corresponding impacts on macro-properties. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 59, 103137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Geng, Z.; She, W.; Zuo, W.; Lyu, K.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, C. Layer-interface properties in 3D printed concrete: Dual hierarchical structure and micromechanical characterization. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 138, 106220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kaya, Y.; Kobya, V.; Kaya, Y.; Mardani, A.; Ramyar, K. Synthesis, characterization, and efficiency evaluation of next-generation grinding aids modified with organic acids. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 493, 143278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Munro, D.; Di Benedetto, G.; Graham, M.; Jans-Singh, M.; Turpin, M.; Kanavaris, F. The assessment of the embodied carbon of resource-constrained materials including ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) and ferrous scrap. Structures 2025, 78, 109175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, Y.S.; Cho, H.K.; Wang, X.Y. Mixture optimization of sustainable concrete with silica fume considering CO2 emissions and cost. Buildings 2022, 12, 1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Roshan, N.; Ghalehnovi, M.; Pakzad, S.S. Recycled steel fiber for fiber reinforced concrete production: Fresh and hardened properties, cost, and ecological assessments. J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 2023, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Used scissors and (b) cut waste fiber images.
Figure 1. (a) Used scissors and (b) cut waste fiber images.
Buildings 15 03731 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the preparation process of 3DPC mixtures.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the preparation process of 3DPC mixtures.
Buildings 15 03731 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the 7-period rheological measurement process applied [36,37,38,39].
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the 7-period rheological measurement process applied [36,37,38,39].
Buildings 15 03731 g003
Figure 4. Control Mixture.
Figure 4. Control Mixture.
Buildings 15 03731 g004
Figure 5. Mixture that does not meet the Shape Stability Criteria.
Figure 5. Mixture that does not meet the Shape Stability Criteria.
Buildings 15 03731 g005
Figure 6. Optimum mixture with 25% YFC substitution.
Figure 6. Optimum mixture with 25% YFC substitution.
Buildings 15 03731 g006
Figure 7. Mixture Not Meeting Buildability Criteria.
Figure 7. Mixture Not Meeting Buildability Criteria.
Buildings 15 03731 g007
Figure 8. Optimum mixture with 50% YFC substitution.
Figure 8. Optimum mixture with 50% YFC substitution.
Buildings 15 03731 g008
Figure 9. Mixture Not Meeting Extrudability Criteria.
Figure 9. Mixture Not Meeting Extrudability Criteria.
Buildings 15 03731 g009
Figure 10. Top view of the optimum mixture with 75% BFS substitution.
Figure 10. Top view of the optimum mixture with 75% BFS substitution.
Buildings 15 03731 g010
Figure 11. Relative change in rheological properties with respect to the control mix.
Figure 11. Relative change in rheological properties with respect to the control mix.
Buildings 15 03731 g011
Figure 12. Relative change in thixotropic properties compared to the control mixture.
Figure 12. Relative change in thixotropic properties compared to the control mixture.
Buildings 15 03731 g012
Figure 13. Carbon emission values of the produced mixtures.
Figure 13. Carbon emission values of the produced mixtures.
Buildings 15 03731 g013
Figure 14. Relative change in carbon emissions due to BFS incorporation, with respect to the control mix.
Figure 14. Relative change in carbon emissions due to BFS incorporation, with respect to the control mix.
Buildings 15 03731 g014
Table 1. Chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties of binder materials.
Table 1. Chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties of binder materials.
Oxides (%)CementBlast Furnace Slag
SiO21835.5
Al2O34.7512.4
Fe2O33.581.5
CaO6338.9
MgO1.45.05
Na2O + 0.658 K2O0.71.07
SO33.111.67
Specific gravity3.062.5
Specific Surface Area (cm2/g)34414950
Compressive Strength (MPa)7-day42.8-
28-day51.8-
Pozzolanic Activity Index (%)28-day-80
90-day-90
Setting Time (min)İnital170-
Final240-
Table 2. Some properties of water-reducing admixture.
Table 2. Some properties of water-reducing admixture.
AdmixtureDensity (g/cm3)Solid Content (%)pHChlorine Content (%)Alkaline Content, Na2O (%)
Polycarboxylate-ether based high range water reducing1.060322–5<0.1<10
Table 3. Some properties of waste steel fiber.
Table 3. Some properties of waste steel fiber.
Fiber TypeFiber Length (mm)Tensile Capacity (MPa)Modulus of Elasticity (MPa)Specific Gravity
Steel5, 10, 151500200,0007.8
Table 4. Embodied CO2 emission and embodied energy factors used within the scope of the study.
Table 4. Embodied CO2 emission and embodied energy factors used within the scope of the study.
Mixing ComponentEmbodied Carbon (kgCO2/kg)
Minimum ValueMaximum Value
Cement0.804 [44]0.94 [45]
BFS0.00 [46]0.07 [47]
Silica Fume0.014 [48]0.024 [49]
Fine Aggregate0.0026 [49]0.017 [44]
Water0 [47]0.001 [50]
Steel Fiber0.43 [47]1.59 [51]
Water Reducing Admixture0.0000052 [52]2.388 [44]
Table 5. Amounts of materials used in the production of 1 m3 3DPC mixture.
Table 5. Amounts of materials used in the production of 1 m3 3DPC mixture.
Mixture NameMixture NoCement (kg/m3)BFS (kg/m3)AggregateWater Reducing Admixture (kg/m3)Fiber Length (cm)Fiber Usage Amount (kg/m3)Silica Fume (kg/m3)w/bExtrudabilityBuildabilityShape Stability
Dmax (mm)Specific GravityDosage
(kg/m3)
K17000225401216.150001.74* 000
2700022540120930001.73** 110
37000225401211.320001.73111
K-0.5-0.547000225401198.620.53901.71111
K-1-0.557000225401185.820.57801.69111
K-0.5-167000225401198.6213901.71111
K-1-177000225401185.8217801.69111
K-0.5-1.587000225401198.621.53901.71111
K-1-1.597000225401185.821.57801.69111
2510525143225401211.320001.81100
11525143225401211.81.80001.81100
125251432254012121.650001.81110
13525143225401212.51.50001.82111
25-0.5-0.514525143225401199.81.50.53901.80111
25-1-0.5155251432254011871.50.57801.78111
25-0.5-116525143225401199.81.513901.80111
25-1-1175251432254011871.517801.78111
25-0.5-1.518525143225401199.81.51.53901.80111
25-1-1.5195251432254011871.51.57801.78111
5020350285.9225401212.51.50001.91100
21350285.9225401213.810001.91110
22350285.92254012150.50001.91110
23350285.9225401216.100001.91111
50-0.5-0.524350285.9225401203.400.53901.89111
50-1-0.525350285.9225401190.600.57801.87111
50-0.5-126350285.9225401203.4013901.89111
50-1-127350285.9225401190.6017801.87111
50-0.5-1.528350285.9225401203.401.53901.89111
50-1-1.529350285.9225401190.601.57801.87111
7530175.2429.4225401215.500002.01100
31175.2377.9225401215.500043.32.04000
32175.2412.2225401215.500014.42.02110
33175.2395225401215.500028.92.03111
75-0.5-0.534175.2395225401202.800.53928.92.01111
75-1-0.535175.239522540119000.57828.91.99111
75-0.5-136175.2395225401202.8013928.92.01111
75-1-137175.2395225401190017828.91.99111
75-0.5-1.538175.2395225401202.801.53928.92.01111
75-1-1.539175.239522540119001.57828.91.99111
* if suitable. ** if not suitable.
Table 6. Rheological properties of 3DPC mixtures.
Table 6. Rheological properties of 3DPC mixtures.
MixtureDynamic Yield Stress (Pa)Viscosity (Pa·s)
K130.5213.47
2564.510.3
5039.576.43
75108.596.89
K-0.5-0.5201.8119.03
K-1-0.5245.7519.53
25-0.5-0.586.6914.8
25-1-0.577.4313.81
50-0.5-0.5118.5414.07
50-1-0.5113.5613.27
75-0.5-0.5154.2413.59
75-1-0.585.28.16
K-0.5-188.4714.53
K-1-184.4511.24
25-0.5-170.4311.69
25-1-1124.0914.78
50-0.5-1123.1215.05
50-1-162.0411.72
75-0.5-188.0411.85
75-1-1200.3513.93
K-0.5-1.5155.1715.93
K-1-1.5104.6315.61
25-0.5-1.555.277.42
25-1-1.556.210.5
50-0.5-1.567.758.17
50-1-1.565.057.69
75-0.5-1.597.768.13
75-1-1.599.8812.31
Table 7. Thixotropic behavior of 3DPC mixtures.
Table 7. Thixotropic behavior of 3DPC mixtures.
MixtureD-SBUAthix (Pa/s)Ithix
K0.820.891.21
250.710.751.31
500.580.221.95
752.521.041.49
K-0.5-0.51.171.031.4
K-1-0.51.34.781.23
25-0.5-0.50.823.561.25
25-1-0.50.692.361.47
50-0.5-0.50.573.091.34
50-1-0.50.451.941.34
75-0.5-0.50.983.191.44
75-1-0.51.30.721.45
K-0.5-10.972.591.2
K-1-10.881.031.47
25-0.5-10.640.1311.19
25-1-10.764.381.35
50-0.5-10.680.081.3
50-1-10.221.31.3
75-0.5-10.915.581.8
75-1-11.5−0.091.37
K-0.5-1.50.833.771.3
K-1-1.50.989.321.67
25-0.5-1.51.021.091.42
25-1-1.50.522.41.41
50-0.5-1.51.082.041.59
50-1-1.50.993.712.05
75-0.5-1.51.1−2.531.41
75-1-1.51.165.761.4
Table 8. Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of carbon emission values.
Table 8. Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of carbon emission values.
MixtureStandard DeviationCoefficient of Variation (%)
K83.213.3
2572.615.2
5060.418.4
7549.127.4
K-0.5-0.5115.117.3
K-1-0.5146.920.9
25-0.5-0.5104.520.3
25-1-0.5136.424.6
50-0.5-0.592.225.2
50-1-0.5124.130.6
75-0.5-0.581.037.1
75-1-0.5112.943.8
K-0.5-1115.117.3
K-1-1146.920.9
25-0.5-1104.520.3
25-1-1136.424.6
50-0.5-192.225.2
50-1-1124.130.6
75-0.5-181.037.1
75-1-1112.943.8
K-0.5-1.5115.117.3
K-1-1.5146.920.9
25-0.5-1.5104.520.3
25-1-1.5136.424.6
50-0.5-1.592.225.2
50-1-1.5124.130.6
75-0.5-1.581.037.1
75-1-1.5112.943.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akgümüş, F.E.; Şahin, H.G.; Mardani, A. Investigation of Waste Steel Fiber Usage Rate and Length Change on Some Fresh State Properties of 3D Printable Concrete Mixtures. Buildings 2025, 15, 3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203731

AMA Style

Akgümüş FE, Şahin HG, Mardani A. Investigation of Waste Steel Fiber Usage Rate and Length Change on Some Fresh State Properties of 3D Printable Concrete Mixtures. Buildings. 2025; 15(20):3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akgümüş, Fatih Eren, Hatice Gizem Şahin, and Ali Mardani. 2025. "Investigation of Waste Steel Fiber Usage Rate and Length Change on Some Fresh State Properties of 3D Printable Concrete Mixtures" Buildings 15, no. 20: 3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203731

APA Style

Akgümüş, F. E., Şahin, H. G., & Mardani, A. (2025). Investigation of Waste Steel Fiber Usage Rate and Length Change on Some Fresh State Properties of 3D Printable Concrete Mixtures. Buildings, 15(20), 3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop