Next Article in Journal
Procedures for Indoor Radon Measurement in Recent Years: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation on the Evolution Mechanism of the Mechanical Performance of Road Tunnel Linings Under Reinforcement Corrosion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Rebai et al. Comparative Analysis of AWP and IPD Methods: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities. Buildings 2025, 15, 2893

1
Centrale Lille, Cité Scientifique—CS 20048, 59651 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France
2
Institut Français de la Construction Lean, 59000 Lille, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(20), 3724; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203724
Submission received: 23 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 16 October 2025

Delete an Author

In the published publication [1], **Olfa Hamdi** was included as an author in the original publication. The corrected Author Contributions statement appears here. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
The contribution statement should corrected to:
Conceptualization, Z.L.; Methodology, S.R. and W.A.; Validation, Z.L.; Formal analysis, S.R. and H.O.; Data curation, H.O.; Writing—original draft, S.R. and H.O.; Writing—review and editing, Z.L. and W.A.; Visualization, H.O.; Supervision, Z.L. and W.A.; Project administration, Z.L. and W.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Delete Affiliation

There was an error regarding the affiliation for **Olfa Hamdi**. In addition to affiliation **Delete Affiliation 2**, the authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Rebai, S.; Lafhaj, Z.; Ouchala, H.; AlBalkhy, W. Comparative Analysis of AWP and IPD Methods: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities. Buildings 2025, 15, 2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rebai, S.; Lafhaj, Z.; Ouchala, H.; AlBalkhy, W. Correction: Rebai et al. Comparative Analysis of AWP and IPD Methods: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities. Buildings 2025, 15, 2893. Buildings 2025, 15, 3724. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203724

AMA Style

Rebai S, Lafhaj Z, Ouchala H, AlBalkhy W. Correction: Rebai et al. Comparative Analysis of AWP and IPD Methods: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities. Buildings 2025, 15, 2893. Buildings. 2025; 15(20):3724. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203724

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rebai, Slim, Zoubeir Lafhaj, Hugues Ouchala, and Wassim AlBalkhy. 2025. "Correction: Rebai et al. Comparative Analysis of AWP and IPD Methods: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities. Buildings 2025, 15, 2893" Buildings 15, no. 20: 3724. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203724

APA Style

Rebai, S., Lafhaj, Z., Ouchala, H., & AlBalkhy, W. (2025). Correction: Rebai et al. Comparative Analysis of AWP and IPD Methods: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities. Buildings 2025, 15, 2893. Buildings, 15(20), 3724. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203724

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop