Next Article in Journal
Optimized Plant Configuration Designs for Wind Damage Prevention in Masonry Heritage Buildings: A Case Study of Zhen Guo Tower in Weihui, Henan, China
Previous Article in Journal
A Rubberized-Aerogel Composite Binder Modifier for Durable and Sustainable Asphalt Pavements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Improving Quality and Sustainability Outcomes in Building Rehabilitation: Concepts, Tools, and a New Assessment Methodology

by
Catarina P. Mouraz
1,*,
José A. R. Mendes Silva
2 and
Tiago Miguel Ferreira
3
1
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Rua Luís Reis Santos, Pólo II, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal
2
CERIS–Pólo de Coimbra, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Rua Luís Reis Santos, Pólo II, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal
3
CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(17), 3001; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173001 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 July 2025 / Revised: 11 August 2025 / Accepted: 22 August 2025 / Published: 23 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Building Materials, and Repair & Renovation)

Abstract

Pursuing quality and sustainability concerns in construction activities is not new. However, the construction sector continues to face criticism for the outcome of many interventions, and significant progress is still required to realise both objectives. This is particularly pressing in sectors essential for quality of life and wellbeing, such as housing, and in areas frequently neglected in research and practice, such as existing buildings. This paper provides insights into the assessment of quality and sustainability in existing buildings, clarifying these concerns, exploring their interrelationship, emphasising the critical role of the design phase, and synthesising relevant methodologies focused on each objective. Furthermore, a novel methodology is proposed to minimise the risk of poor quality in building rehabilitation processes. Methodologically, the paper includes a review of concepts associated with quality and sustainability in building rehabilitation, a synthesis of existing evaluation tools and methods, and the development of the proposed methodology. The main findings include a definition of construction quality, identification of strong correlations between quality and sustainability, and the recognition that using accessible, flexible, and collaborative tools during the design phase is crucial to achieving both objectives, especially in the context of existing buildings, where practical and operational outcomes remain limited.
Keywords: building rehabilitation; construction quality; housing sustainability; assessment methods building rehabilitation; construction quality; housing sustainability; assessment methods

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mouraz, C.P.; Silva, J.A.R.M.; Ferreira, T.M. Improving Quality and Sustainability Outcomes in Building Rehabilitation: Concepts, Tools, and a New Assessment Methodology. Buildings 2025, 15, 3001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173001

AMA Style

Mouraz CP, Silva JARM, Ferreira TM. Improving Quality and Sustainability Outcomes in Building Rehabilitation: Concepts, Tools, and a New Assessment Methodology. Buildings. 2025; 15(17):3001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mouraz, Catarina P., José A. R. Mendes Silva, and Tiago Miguel Ferreira. 2025. "Improving Quality and Sustainability Outcomes in Building Rehabilitation: Concepts, Tools, and a New Assessment Methodology" Buildings 15, no. 17: 3001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173001

APA Style

Mouraz, C. P., Silva, J. A. R. M., & Ferreira, T. M. (2025). Improving Quality and Sustainability Outcomes in Building Rehabilitation: Concepts, Tools, and a New Assessment Methodology. Buildings, 15(17), 3001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop