Assessment of Aerodynamic Properties of the Ventilated Cavity in Curtain Wall Systems Under Varying Climatic and Design Conditions
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
| Average air cavity temperature, °C | |
| Outdoor temperature, °C | |
| Indoor temperature, °C | |
| Cladding surface temperature, °C | |
| External surface heat transfer coefficient | |
| Internal surface heat transfer coefficient | |
| Air cavity heat transfer coefficient | |
| Cladding thickness, m | |
| Thermal conductivity of external cladding, Vt/(m·°C) | |
| Overall heat transfer coefficient, Vt/(m2·°C) | |
| Approximate external surface heat transfer coefficient, Vt/(m2·°C) | |
| Approximate internal surface heat transfer coefficient, Vt/(m2·°C) | |
| Specific heat capacity of air, J/(kg·K) | |
| Air density, kg/m3 | |
| Thermal resistance of the external part of the assembly, m2·°C/Vt | |
| Thermal resistance of the internal part of the assembly, m2·°C/Vt | |
| Air velocity in the cavity, m/s | |
| Frictional pressure loss along the cavity height, Pa | |
| Specific friction loss at the given airflow velocity in the cavity, Pa/m | |
| h | Air cavity height, m |
| b | Air cavity thickness, m |
| Pressure loss during air movement in the cavity, Pa | |
| P | Atmospheric pressure, mmHg |
| ξi | Local resistance coefficient |
Appendix A
| At Various Façade Heights (h), m | At Various Air Cavity Thicknesses (b), m | At Ambient Outdoor Air Temperature , °C | At Atmospheric Pressure (P), mmHg | Air Density , kg/m3 | At local Resistance Coefficient (ξi) | , m2·°C/Vt | Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Air Cavity | Average Air Temperature in the Cavity , °C | Cladding Surface Temperature , °C | Air Velocity in the Cavity , m/s | Total Pressure Loss During Air Movement in the Cavity , Pa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0.05 | 10 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 2.25/0.18 | 11.98 | 21.55 | 36.83 | 1.92 | 17.347 |
| 3.0 | 10.18 | 22.94 | 38.08 | 1.44 | 14.031 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 9.32 | 23.81 | 38.74 | 1.21 | 12.461 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 11.43 | 19.82 | 36.50 | 1.77 | 16.566 | ||||
| 3.0 | 9.77 | 21.11 | 37.72 | 1.33 | 13.614 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 9.01 | 21.92 | 38.36 | 1.13 | 12.379 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 11.01 | 18.61 | 36.31 | 1.66 | 16.035 | ||||
| 3.0 | 9.47 | 19.79 | 37.50 | 1.25 | 13.367 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 8.75 | 20.56 | 38.11 | 1.06 | 12.222 | ||||||
| 0.1 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 10.67 | 17.69 | 36.20 | 1.57 | 13.773 | |||
| 3.0 | 9.22 | 18.80 | 37.35 | 1.19 | 11.151 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 8.55 | 19.53 | 37.94 | 1.01 | 9.9500 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 10.15 | 16.42 | 36.10 | 1.43 | 12.900 | ||||
| 3.0 | 8.85 | 17.40 | 37.18 | 1.09 | 10.638 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 8.24 | 18.04 | 37.73 | 0.93 | 9.6350 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 9.77 | 15.55 | 36.07 | 1.33 | 12.302 | ||||
| 3.0 | 8.57 | 16.43 | 37.09 | 1.01 | 10.199 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 8.02 | 17.02 | 37.61 | 0.87 | 9.4180 | ||||||
| 18 | 0.05 | 10 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 18.87 | 26.76 | 36.66 | 4.01 | 103.50 | |
| 3.0 | 15.61 | 28.36 | 38.14 | 2.97 | 80.895 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 13.98 | 29.28 | 38.92 | 2.48 | 70.297 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 18.11 | 24.69 | 35.94 | 3.76 | 99.835 | ||||
| 3.0 | 15.03 | 26.26 | 37.46 | 2.79 | 79.080 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 13.49 | 27.17 | 38.27 | 2.34 | 69.643 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 17.48 | 23.16 | 35.45 | 3.55 | 96.625 | ||||
| 3.0 | 14.56 | 24.66 | 36.98 | 2.65 | 77.836 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 13.09 | 25.55 | 37.81 | 2.23 | 69.315 | ||||||
| 0.1 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 16.96 | 21.96 | 35.10 | 3.39 | 85.912 | |||
| 3.0 | 14.15 | 23.40 | 36.63 | 2.54 | 67.542 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 12.75 | 24.25 | 37.46 | 2.14 | 59.024 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 16.13 | 20.20 | 34.65 | 3.13 | 81.132 | ||||
| 3.0 | 13.51 | 21.51 | 36.17 | 2.35 | 64.547 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 12.20 | 22.31 | 36.99 | 1.98 | 56.802 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 15.49 | 18.95 | 34.39 | 2.93 | 77.482 | ||||
| 3.0 | 13.01 | 20.15 | 35.89 | 2.21 | 62.495 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 11.78 | 20.90 | 36.69 | 1.87 | 55.619 | ||||||
| 30 | 0.05 | 10 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 23.20 | 29.25 | 36.98 | 5.55 | 234.110 | |
| 3.0 | 19.10 | 30.90 | 38.48 | 4.09 | 180.471 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 17.03 | 31.81 | 39.26 | 3.41 | 155.630 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 22.36 | 27.15 | 36.09 | 5.24 | 226.589 | ||||
| 3.0 | 14.48 | 28.82 | 37.67 | 3.88 | 177.408 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 16.51 | 29.76 | 38.50 | 3.25 | 154.971 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 21.67 | 25.55 | 35.45 | 4.99 | 220.675 | ||||
| 3.0 | 17.95 | 27.19 | 37.07 | 3.71 | 175.165 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 16.07 | 28.13 | 37.93 | 3.11 | 154.147 | ||||||
| 0.1 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 21.08 | 24.26 | 34.97 | 4.78 | 198.825 | |||
| 3.0 | 17.50 | 25.86 | 36.61 | 3.56 | 154.233 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 15.69 | 26.79 | 37.49 | 2.99 | 133.625 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 20.13 | 22.33 | 34.30 | 4.44 | 188.417 | ||||
| 3.0 | 16.76 | 23.83 | 35.95 | 3.33 | 148.593 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 15.06 | 24.72 | 36.84 | 2.80 | 129.740 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 19.38 | 20.93 | 33.88 | 4.18 | 180.612 | ||||
| 3.0 | 16.17 | 22.33 | 35.52 | 3.14 | 143.790 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 14.55 | 23.18 | 36.41 | 2.65 | 126.798 | ||||||
| 60 | 0.05 | 10 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 30.44 | 32.45 | 37.76 | 8.48 | 698.994 | |
| 3.0 | 24.91 | 34.05 | 39.20 | 6.20 | 529.012 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 22.13 | 34.90 | 39.94 | 5.15 | 451.025 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 29.53 | 30.44 | 36.72 | 8.09 | 680.617 | ||||
| 3.0 | 24.26 | 32.14 | 38.29 | 5.95 | 522.901 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 21.60 | 33.06 | 39.11 | 4.96 | 450.453 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 28.76 | 28.83 | 35.92 | 7.76 | 665.145 | ||||
| 3.0 | 23.70 | 30.57 | 37.57 | 5.74 | 518.282 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 21.13 | 31.53 | 38.44 | 4.79 | 449.541 | ||||||
| 0.1 | 600 | 0.985 | 1.5 | 28.10 | 27.50 | 35.28 | 7.48 | 610.771 | |||
| 3.0 | 23.20 | 29.25 | 36.98 | 5.55 | 468.021 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 20.71 | 30.23 | 37.89 | 4.65 | 401.916 | ||||||
| 800 | 1.313 | 1.5 | 26.99 | 25.44 | 34.34 | 7.03 | 583.847 | ||||
| 3.0 | 22.36 | 27.15 | 36.09 | 5.24 | 452.988 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 20.01 | 28.14 | 37.04 | 4.40 | 392.157 | ||||||
| 1000 | 1.641 | 1.5 | 26.09 | 23.89 | 33.68 | 6.67 | 562.528 | ||||
| 3.0 | 21.67 | 25.55 | 35.45 | 4.99 | 441.170 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 19.42 | 26.51 | 36.42 | 4.20 | 384.869 |
References
- Xian, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, Y. Driving factors and reduction paths dynamic simulation optimization of carbon dioxide emissions in China’s construction industry under the perspective of dual carbon targets. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2025, 112, 107789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, F.; Feng, W.; Luo, M.; You, K.; Ma, M.; Jiang, R.; Leng, J.; Sun, L. Techno-economic analysis of residential building heating strategies for cost-effective upgrades in European cities. iScience 2023, 26, 107541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manzueta, R.; Kumar, P.; Ariño, A.H.; Martín-Gómez, C. Strategies to reduce air pollution emissions from urban residential buildings. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 951, 175809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhangabay, N.; Bakhbergen, S.; Aldiyarov, Z.; Tursunkululy, T.; Kolesnikov, A. Analysis of thermal efficiency of external fencing made of innovative ceramic blocks. Constr. Mater. Prod. 2024, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhangabay, N.; Kudabayev, R.A.; Mizamov, N.; Imanaliyev, K.; Kolesnikov, A.; Moldagaliyev, A.; Merekeyeva, A. Study of the model of the phase transition envelope taking into account the process of thermal storage under natural draft and by air injection. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 18, e02050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagybayev, A.; Zhangabay, N.; Suleimenov, U.; Avramov, K.; Uspenskyi, B.; Umbitaliyev, A. Revealing patterns of thermophysical parameters in the designed energy—Saving structures for external fencing with air channels. East.-Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 2023, 4, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H. Intelligent management of industrial building energy saving based on artificial intelligence. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borovkov, A.I.; Vafaeva, K.M.; Vatin, N.I.; Ponyaeva, I. Synergistic Integration of Digital Twins and Neural Networks for Advancing Optimization in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review. Constr. Mater. Prod. 2024, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhangabay, N.; Tursunkululy, T.; Ibraimova, U.; Abdikerova, U. Energy-Efficient Adaptive Dynamic Building Facades: A Review of Their Energy Efficiency and Operating Loads. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhangabay, N.; Zhangabay, A.; Utelbayeva, A.; Tursunkululy, T.; Sultanov, M.; Kolesnikov, A. Energy-Efficient Outdoor Fencing with Air Layers: A Review of the Effect of Solar Radiation on the Exterior Fencing of Buildings Made of Composite Material. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhangabay, N.; Giyasov, A.; Bakhbergen, S.; Tursunkululy, T.; Kolesnikov, A. Thermovision study of a residential building under climatic conditions of South Kazakhstan in a cold period. Constr. Mater. Prod. 2024, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, N.; Han, L.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, J.; Li, Q. Design science research (DSR) in construction: Theoretical conceptualization of practice and practical realization of theory. Autom. Constr. 2025, 176, 106298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Gracia, A.; Castell, A.; Navarro, L.; Oró, E.; Cabeza, L.F. Numerical modelling of ventilated facades: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 22, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbosa, S.; Ip, K. Perspectives of double skin façades for naturally ventilated buildings: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibañez-Puy, M.; Vidaurre-Arbizu, M.; Sacristán-Fernández, J.A.; Martín-Gómez, C. Opaque Ventilated Façades: Thermal and energy performance review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jankovic, A.; Goia, F. Impact of double skin facade constructional features on heat transfer and fluid dynamic behaviour. Build. Environ. 2021, 196, 107796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Q.; Zhao, X.; Song, Y.; Qi, J.; Shi, L. Determining the potential risks of naturally ventilated double skin façades. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, R.A.; Imghoure, O.; Tittelein, P.; Belouaggadia, N.; Chehade, F.H.; Sebaibi, N.; Stéphane, L.; Zalewski, L. Application of Ventilated Solar Façades to enhance the energy efficiency of buildings: A comprehensive review. Energy Rep. 2025, 13, 1266–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Wei, A.; Zou, S.; Dong, Q.; Qi, J.; Song, Y.; Shi, L. Controlling naturally ventilated double-skin façade to reduce energy consumption in buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 202, 114649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pizzatto, S.M.; Pizzatto, F.; Raupp-Pereira, F.; Arcaro, S.; Angioletto, E.; Montedo, O. Ventilated facade system: A review. Boletín De La Soc. Española De Cerámica Y Vidr. 2025, 64, 100443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mootz, F.; Bezian, J. Numerical study of a ventilated facade panel. Sol. Energy 1996, 57, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balocco, C. A simple model to study ventilated facades energy performance. Energy Build. 2002, 5, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciampi, M.; Leccese, F.; Tuoni, G. Ventilated facades energy performance in summer cooling of buildings. Sol. Energy 2003, 75, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimoudi, A.; Androutsopoulos, A.; Lykoudis, S. Summer performance of a ventilated roof component. Energy Build. 2006, 38, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraisse, G.; Johannes, K.; Trillat-Berdal, V.; Achard, G. The use of a heavy internal wall with a ventilated air gap to store solar energy and improve summer comfort in timber frame houses. Energy Build. 2006, 38, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, P.C.; Prasad, D.; Behnia, M. A new type of double-skin façade configuration for the hot and humid climate. Energy Build. 2008, 40, 1941–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanjuan, C.; José Suárez, M.; González, M.; Pistono, J.; Blanco, E. Energy performance of an open-joint ventilated façade compared with a conventional sealed cavity façade. Sol. Energy 2011, 85, 1851–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stazi, F.; Tomassoni, F.; Vegliò, A.; Di Perna, C. Experimental evaluation of ventilated walls with an external clay cladding. Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 3373–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez, M.N.; Sanjuan, C.; Suárez, M.J.; Heras, M.R. Experimental assessment of the performance of open joint ventilated façades with buoyancy-driven airflow. Sol. Energy 2013, 91, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nizovtsev, M.I.; Belyi, V.T.; Sterlygov, A.N. The facade system with ventilated channels for thermal insulation of newly constructed and renovated buildings. Energy Build. 2014, 75, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nizovtsev, M.I.; Letushko, V.N.; Borodulin, V.Y.; Sterlyagov, A.N. Experimental studies of the thermo and humidity state of a new building facade insulation system based on panels with ventilated channels. Energy Build. 2020, 206, 109607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borodulin, V.Y.; Nizovtsev, M.I. Modeling heat and moisture transfer of building facades thermally insulated by the panels with ventilated channels. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gagliano, A.; Nocera, F.; Aneli, S. Thermodynamic analysis of ventilated façades under different wind conditions in summer period. Energy Build. 2016, 122, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gagliano, A.; Aneli, S. Analysis of the energy performance of an Opaque Ventilated Façade under winter and summer weather conditions. Sol. Energy 2020, 205, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karanafti, A.; Theodosiou, T. Summer thermal performance analysis of an Opaque ventilated Façade operating under the dynamic insulation principle. Energy Build. 2024, 312, 114193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roig, O.; Summa, S.; Pardal, C.; Isalgue, A.; Di Perna, C.; Stazi, F. Opaque ventilated façades: Energy performance for different main walls and claddings. Energy Build. 2024, 314, 114280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, J. Dynamic modeling of the ventilated double skin façade in hot summer and cold winter zone in China. Build. Environ. 2016, 106, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhangabay, N.; Giyasov, A.; Oner, A.; Zhangabay, A.; Tursunkululy, T.; Bakhbergen, S. Analysis of the Impact of Residential Building Shape and Orientation on Energy Efficiency. Buildings 2025, 15, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Code of Rules of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2.04-01-2017. Building Climatology: State Standards in the Field of Architecture, Urban Planning and Construction. Code of Rules of the Republic of Kazakhstan.—JSC “KazNIISA”, LLP “Astana Stroy-Consulting”, 2017. Approved and Enacted on 20 December 2017. 43 p. Available online: https://gos24.kz/uploads/documents/2022-12/sp-rk-2.04-01-2017-stroitelnaya-klimatologiya.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Code of Rules of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2.04-107-2022. Building Heat Engineering: State Standards in the Field of Ar-chitecture, Urban Planning and Construction. Code of Rules of the Republic of Kazakhstan.—JSC “KazNIISA”, LLP “Astana Stroy-Consulting”, 2013. Approved and Enacted on 1 July 2015. 80p. Available online: https://online.zakon.kz/m/document/?doc_id=37599018 (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Protasevich, A.M.; Krutilin, A.B. Aerodynamic calculation of ventilated façade systems of buildings with continuous screens. Hous. Constr. 2011, 7, 37–41. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aerodinamicheskiy-raschet-ventiliruemyh-fasadnyh-sistem-zdaniy-so-sploshnymi-ekranami (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Edae Jiru, T.; Haghighat, F. Modeling ventilated double skin façade—A zonal approach. Energy Build. 2008, 40, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhangabay, N.; Oner, A.; Rakhimov, M.; Tursunkululy, T.; Abdikerova, U. Thermal Performance Evaluation of a Retrofitted Building with Adaptive Composite Energy-Saving Facade Systems. Energies 2025, 18, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, L.C.O.; Souza, H.A.; Rodrigues, E.F. Experimental and numerical analysis of a naturally ventilated double-skin façade. Energy Build. 2018, 165, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Król, A.; Król, M. Experimental and numerical research on the solar updraft at a tall building façade. Build. Environ. 2023, 240, 110466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santa Cruz Astorqui, J.; Porras-Amores, C. Ventilated facade with double chamber and flow control device. Energy Build. 2017, 149, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez-Gil, F.J.; Silva, E.C.N.; Montealegre-Rubio, W. Design of topology-optimized functionally graded porous structures under transient loads. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2024, 284, 109732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gairola, S.; Jayaganthan, R. Lattice infill strategies for topology optimisation towards achieving lightweight designs for additive manufacturing: Structural integrity, and manufacturing consideration. J. Manuf. Process. 2025, 139, 224–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Study | Year/Type | Key Findings | Relevance to the Present Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mootz, F. and Bezian J. [21] | 1996/ Theoretical | Results show that large spacing between air ducts contributes to energy recovery during sunny periods. | Examines the effect of solar radiation on heat exchange in air ducts, but does not address air velocity within the cavity. |
| Balocco, C. [22] | 2002/ Theoretical | Investigated the effect of surface and air temperature with varying air cavity widths. A 7 cm cavity provided a cooling effect in summer. | Demonstrated the impact of surface and air temperature with different cavity widths, but did not analyze façade height or air velocity variations. |
| Ciampi, M. [23] | 2003/ Theoretical | Presented an analytical method for estimating energy savings. Two cases studied, highlighting the influence of air cavity width, solar radiation, and wall surface on energy performance. | Showed the influence of several parameters on thermal performance; however, vertical and parametric variation analyses under different thermal loads were not conducted. |
| Dimoudi, A. et al. [24] | 2006/Experimental | Experimentally investigated the height of the air cavity. Results showed significant improvement in thermal performance due to the cavity. | Demonstrated the effect of cavity height, though other geometric parameters were not examined. |
| Fraisse, G. et al. [25] | 2006/Experimental | Compared closed and ventilated air cavities for winter and summer conditions; both showed effectiveness in their respective climates. | Highlighted the benefits of air cavities under different climates, but additional research is needed on cavity geometry and temperature load variations. |
| Wong, P. et al. [26] | 2008/ Theoretical | CFD analysis was used to assess thermal comfort under various double-skin façade configurations in hot and humid climates through natural ventilation in high-rise buildings. | Identified efficient façade configurations, indicating the need for further parametric analysis under diverse climatic conditions. |
| Sanjuan, C. et al. [27,28] | 2011/ Theoretical | Investigated parameters such as open joints and sealed cavities. | Found that open joints are effective for hot climates and sealed cavities for cold ones. Further parametric studies of cavity geometry are needed. |
| Sánchez, M. and Nizovtsev, M. [29,30,31,32] | 2013–2020/ Experimental | Studied the impact of air cavities; confirmed their effectiveness in external enclosures. | Validated cavity effectiveness but highlighted the need for further studies with parametric assessments. |
| Gagliano, A. et al. [33,34] | 2016–2021/ Theoretical | Studied effects of wind conditions in summer; wind forces combined with buoyancy significantly influenced system performance. | The findings indicate that parametric analysis of cavity geometry in relation to wind conditions remains an open area of research. |
| Karanafti, A. [35] | 2024/ Theoretical | Investigated insulation in ventilated façades; ambient air infiltration beyond the insulation reduced heat load in hot climates. | Demonstrated the efficiency of air cavities but indicated a need for further parametric evaluation of air cavity configurations. |
| Façade Height (h), m | Air Cavity Thickness (b), m | Ambient Air Temperature ), °C | Atmospheric Pressure (P), mmHg | Local Resistance Coefficient (ξi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/18/30/60 | 0.05/0.1 | 10/20/30/40 | 600 | 1.5 |
| 3.0 | ||||
| 4.5 | ||||
| 800 | 1.5 | |||
| 3.0 | ||||
| 4.5 | ||||
| 1000 | 1.5 | |||
| 3.0 | ||||
| 4.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhangabay, N.; Zhangabay, A.; Akmalaiuly, K.; Utelbayeva, A.; Duissenbekov, B. Assessment of Aerodynamic Properties of the Ventilated Cavity in Curtain Wall Systems Under Varying Climatic and Design Conditions. Buildings 2025, 15, 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152637
Zhangabay N, Zhangabay A, Akmalaiuly K, Utelbayeva A, Duissenbekov B. Assessment of Aerodynamic Properties of the Ventilated Cavity in Curtain Wall Systems Under Varying Climatic and Design Conditions. Buildings. 2025; 15(15):2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152637
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhangabay, Nurlan, Aizhan Zhangabay, Kenzhebek Akmalaiuly, Akmaral Utelbayeva, and Bolat Duissenbekov. 2025. "Assessment of Aerodynamic Properties of the Ventilated Cavity in Curtain Wall Systems Under Varying Climatic and Design Conditions" Buildings 15, no. 15: 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152637
APA StyleZhangabay, N., Zhangabay, A., Akmalaiuly, K., Utelbayeva, A., & Duissenbekov, B. (2025). Assessment of Aerodynamic Properties of the Ventilated Cavity in Curtain Wall Systems Under Varying Climatic and Design Conditions. Buildings, 15(15), 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152637

