Structural Failures in an Architectural Heritage Site: Case Study of the Blagoveštenje Monastery Church, Kablar, Serbia
Abstract
1. Introduction
- Undertake active research of the locality that will contribute to the protection and preservation of the entire monastery complex;
- Improve knowledge about the importance of preserving historical buildings, and their potential, to reconstruct and pass on cultural heritage;
- Discover the causes of the structural failure of the church and its inclination;
- Determine the construction measures needed to prevent further damage during the rehabilitation, thus preventing structural failures as well;
- Systematize knowledge on the causes of the church’s damage, and recommend construction measures for preservation, rehabilitation, and the prevention of further deterioration;
- Make the research results available to professionals who deal with similar problems.
Literature Review
- The weight of the masonry structure;
- Earth pressure: Mainly governed by the nature and the compaction of the artificial filling, excavations, refilling compaction, rainwater effects, the live loads, and seismic motion;
- Hydraulic action: Increase in unit weight due to saturation, smoothing of the stone blocks’ joints, hydrostatic pressure behind the low-permeability parts of the wall, and natural degradation of the stone blocks with a loss of mass;
- Military actions such as bombardments, and ground blasting during the construction of tunnels;
- Earthquakes, as seismic action.
2. Historical Review and the Results of the Previous Restoration Works
3. Previous Works on the Restoration of the Church
4. Results of Site Investigation
4.1. In Situ Observation and Deformation Measurement as Research Methods
4.2. Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry
4.3. Geophysical Surveys
4.4. Geological Research
5. Discussion
- Measuring with self-levelling laser, digital level, laser distance meter, building meter (equipment for architects and builders);
- Three-dimensional laser scanning, to create digital substrates on which deformations are measured;
- Geodetic observation and monitoring of subsidence;
- Geophysical research carried out using the GPR method as a non-destructive method;
- Geological research and excavation of exploration pits as a destructive method.
5.1. Implications of Historical Review and Previous Restaurations
5.2. Implications of In Situ Measurements and 3D Laser Scan and Photogrammetry
5.3. Implications of Geophysical and Geological Survey Results
5.4. Systematical Presentation of Results
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Šekularac, N.; Debljović Ristić, N.; Mijović, D.; Cvetković, V.; Barišić, S.; Ivanović-Šekularac, J. The Use of Natural Stone as an Authentic Building Material for the Restoration of Historic Buildings in Order to Test Sustainable Refurbishment: Case Study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Nara Document on Authenticity, 199. Available online: http://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/386-the-nara-document-on-authenticity-1994 (accessed on 27 May 2019).
- Lambrinou, L. Preserving a Monument: The Example of the Parthenon. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2010, 12, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez Robles, L. A Methodological Approach Towards Conservation. Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 2010, 12, 146–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binda, L.; Saisi, A. State of the Art of Research on Historic Structures in Italy. Advanced Research Centre for Cultural Heritage Interdisciplinary Projects. 2001. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440027_State_of_the_Art_of_Research_on_Historic_Structures_in_Italy (accessed on 5 September 2024).
- Lourenco, P.B. The ICOMOS Methodology for Conservation of Cultural Heritage Buildings: Concepts, Research and Application to Case Studies. In Proceedings of the Conference REHAB 2014—International Conference on Preservation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Historical Buildings and Structures, Tomar, Portugal, 19–21 March 2014; p. 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roca, P.; Cervera, M.; Gariup, G.; Pelà, L. Structural Analysis of Masonry Historical Constructions. Classical and Advanced Approaches. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2010, 17, 99–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hola, J.; Schabowicz, K. State-of-the-art non-destructive methods for diagnostic testing of building structures—Anticipated development trends. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2010, 10, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Ayala, D.F.; Forsyth, M. What is conservation engineering? In Structures & Construction in Historic Building Conservation; Forsyth, M., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egels, Y.; Kasser, M. Digital Photogrammetry; Taylor & Francis: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2002; 376p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, T.; Fouad, N.A. Guidelines for Thermography in Architecture and Civil Engineering: Theory, Application Areas, Practical Implementation; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2021; 176p, ISBN 978 3 0356 2267 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jol, H.M. (Ed.) Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 18, 524p, ISBN 978 0 444 53348 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diz-Mellado, E.; Mascort-Albea, E.J.; Romero-Hernández, R.; Galán-Marín, C.; Rivera-Gómez, C.; Ruiz-Jaramillo, J.; Jaramillo-Morilla, A. Non-destructive testing and Finite Element Method integrated procedure for heritage diagnosis: The Seville Cathedral case study. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 37, 102134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raszczuk, K.; Karolak, A. Correlation between the cracking pattern of historical structure and soil properties: The case of the church in Kożuchów. Herit. Sci. 2021, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casarin, F.; Valluzzi, M.R.; da Porto, F.; Modena, C. Evaluation of the structural behaviour of historic masonry buildings by a sonic pulse velocity method. In Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture X; Brebbia, C.A., Ed.; WIT Press: Southampton, UK, 2014; pp. 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watt, D. Building Pathology: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Huma, I. Investigating, monitoring and load testing historic structures. In Structures & Construction in Historic Building Conservation; Forsyth, M., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2007; pp. 64–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saisi, A.; Gentile, C. Investigation Strategy for Structural Assessment of Historic Towers. Infrastructures 2020, 5, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penelis George, G.; Penelis Gregory, G. Structural Restoration of Masonry Monuments; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2020; ISBN 978-0367109479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feilden, B.M. Conservation of Historic Buildings; Architectural Press: Oxford, MA, USA, 2003; p. 64. ISBN 978-0750658638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lignola, G.P.; Buratti, N.; Cattari, S.; Parisi, F.; Ubertini, F.; Alfano, S.; Ierimonti, L.; Meoni, A.; Sivori, D.; Virgulto, G. Validated and Optimized Strategies for Preserving Historical Heritage Towards Natural and Anthropic Risks: Insights from the DETECT-AGING Project. Buildings 2025, 15, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egglezos, D.; Ioannidou, M.; Moullou, D.; Kalogeras, I. Geotechnical issues of the Athenian Acropolis. In Geotechnics and Heritage; Bilotta, E., Flora, A., Lirer, S., Viggiani, C., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; p. 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šekularac, N.; Čikić Tovarović, J.; Ivanović-Šekularac, J. Cultural heritage and structural stability of the old rampart wall, Holy Mount Athos–Case study. Struct. Eng. Int. 2017, 3, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przewłócki, J.; Dardzinska, I.; Swinianski, J. Review of historical buildings’ foundations. Géotechnique 2005, 55, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ukleja, J. Renovation of the historic building after damage connected with foundations subsidence—Case study MATEC Web of Conferences. In Proceedings of the 3rd Scientific Conference Environmental Challenges in Civil Engineering, Opole, Poland, 23–25 April 2018; p. 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egglezos, D.; Moullou, D.; Ioannidou, M. The role of the geotechnical engineer in archaeological work: The Greek experience. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering for the Preservation of Monuments and Historic Sites, Napoli, Italy, 30–31 May 2013; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2013; pp. 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.; Yang, B.; Yang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Q. Real-Time Monitoring for Monolithic Movement of a Heritage Curtilage Using Wireless Sensor Networks. Buildings 2022, 12, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Čanak Medić, M. Blagoveštenje pod Kablarom. Saopštenje XIX; Beograd, Republički zavod za zaštitu Spomenika Kulture: Belgrade, Serbia, 1970; pp. 199–221. [Google Scholar]
- Rajić, D.; Timotijević, M. Manastiri Ovčarsko-Kablarske Klisure, 2nd ed.; Narodni muzej: Čačak, Serbia, 2012; ISBN 978 86 84067 44 1. Available online: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL30953510M (accessed on 10 September 2024).
- Bošković, Đ.; Zdravković, I.; Garašanin i Jovan Kovačević, M. Spomenici Kulture u Ovčarsko-Kablarskoj Klisuri; Ovčarsko-kablarski manastiri: Čačak, Serbia, 1991; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Stefanović Karadžić, V. Početak Opisanija Srpski Manastira; Ovčarsko-kablarski manastiri; Gradac: Čačak, Serbia, 1991; Istoriski glasnik: Organ Istoriskog društva Narodne Republike Srbije (1–2, 1990–1992, str. 145–146) januar–april: 19 (98/99); p. 15. ISSN 0021-2644. [Google Scholar]
- Hrabovski, O. Konstruktivna Asanacija Stabilizacija Crkve Manastira Blagoveštenja pod Kablarom, Saopštenje IX. Beograd, Republički Zavod za Zaštitu Spomenika Kulture, 1970. pp. 189–198. Available online: https://www.heritage.gov.rs/cirilica/Download/Saopstenja/Saopstenje-IX-1970/Saopstenje_IX_1970_Konstruktivna_asanacija_i_stabilizacija_crkve_manastira_Blagovestenja_pod_Kablarom.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2024).
- Čanak Medić, M.; Hrabovski, O. Projekat Asanacije Restauracije i Konzervacije Crkve Manastira Blagoveštenja—Kablarskog; Zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture Kraljevo: Kraljevo, Serbia, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmadi, S.S.; Karanikoloudis, G.; Mendes, N.; Illambas, R.; Lourenço, P.B. Appraising the Seismic Response of a Retrofitted Adobe Historic Structure, the Role of Modal Updating and Advanced Computations. Buildings 2022, 12, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geodetic Bureau. GEOMETAR 036“. Elaboration of Geodetic Works for the Control of Foundation Subsidence in the Annunciation Monastery on the Plot 2318 K.O; Geodetic Bureau: Kraljevo, Serbia, 2021. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
- Vekom Geo d.o.o. Report on 3D Laser Imaging of the Object; Vekom Geo, d.o.o.: Belgrade, Serbia, 2021. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
- Centre for New Technologies. Report on 3D Laser Imaging Report on Geophysical Research at the Location of the Annunciation Monastery; Ovčar Banja: Belgrade, Serbia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Geo-In International d.o.o. Report on Engineering Geological Research for the Needs of the Rehabilitation of the Annunciation Monastery; Geo-In International d.o.o.: Belgrade, Serbia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Date | Devastated/Cause/Hazard | Intervention |
---|---|---|
1601 | Church built. | |
1644 | Restored church and rebuilt altar apse [27]. | |
Church burnt down. | ||
1865 | Restored church. | |
1906 | Restored church. | |
1908 1913 | Monastery abandoned. | |
1932 | Restored church and reuse | |
- | Works on the structural stability: Strengthening the foundation in the form of a ring around the object (w/h = 25/40 cm).Application of Ø60 mm steel tie-rods under the mid-level cornice along the length of the building. | |
1946 | Construction of hydropower plant “Ovčar Banja”, construction of tunnels, and blasting. Consequence: cracks on the altar apse, and its separation from the walls. | |
1947 | Tunnelling under the monastery complex. Consequence: cracks on the facade, spreading of arches along the ports, supports of the dome. | |
1966 | Works to ensure the stability of the church: RC ring reinforcements in the southeast zone (around the south choir, altar apse to the north choir) w/h = 50/60 cm. Designed and executed RC ring beam on the walls. Replacement of steel tie-rods with buried wooden tie-rods at mid-level cornice. Installation of 4 wooden tie-rods reinforced with steel sheets on the west side of the church and at the sub-dome arches of the church. |
Research Findings | Main Results | References |
---|---|---|
Measurements in situ |
Mid-level cornice—south wall h0 = 0.0 cm, north wall hvs = −28.5 cm Wall inclination— NE part of the north wall: 20 mm/m to the north NE pilaster: 35 mm/m to the north Apse threads: 31 mm/m to the east SW corner of the west wall: 28 mm/m to the west Inclination of pilasters— SE—horizontal movements of the mid-level cornice 9.5 cm (1967)/15.5 cm (2020) SW—horizontal movements of the mid-level cornice 17.5 cm (1967)/23.5 cm (2020)
| Data from 1967 [32] Data from 2020/2022 in situ |
NDT Test | Main Results | References |
Laser levelling |
| [35] |
3D laser scan and photogrammetry |
Mid-level cornice—south–north—31 cm | [36] |
Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) |
The depth of the rock mass is in the range of 2.5–3.5m
| [37] |
DT Test | Main Results | References |
Soil properties |
| [38] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ivanović-Šekularac, J.; Sokolović, N.; Macut, N.; Žišić, T.; Šekularac, N. Structural Failures in an Architectural Heritage Site: Case Study of the Blagoveštenje Monastery Church, Kablar, Serbia. Buildings 2025, 15, 2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132328
Ivanović-Šekularac J, Sokolović N, Macut N, Žišić T, Šekularac N. Structural Failures in an Architectural Heritage Site: Case Study of the Blagoveštenje Monastery Church, Kablar, Serbia. Buildings. 2025; 15(13):2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132328
Chicago/Turabian StyleIvanović-Šekularac, Jelena, Neda Sokolović, Nikola Macut, Tijana Žišić, and Nenad Šekularac. 2025. "Structural Failures in an Architectural Heritage Site: Case Study of the Blagoveštenje Monastery Church, Kablar, Serbia" Buildings 15, no. 13: 2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132328
APA StyleIvanović-Šekularac, J., Sokolović, N., Macut, N., Žišić, T., & Šekularac, N. (2025). Structural Failures in an Architectural Heritage Site: Case Study of the Blagoveštenje Monastery Church, Kablar, Serbia. Buildings, 15(13), 2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132328