Next Article in Journal
Analytical Investigation of Dynamic Response in Cracked Structure Subjected to Moving Load
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study on the Hydrophobicity and Icephobicity of Modified Cement-Based Composite Coatings for Anti-/De-Icing of Guardrail Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
Day–Night Synergy Between Built Environment and Thermal Comfort and Its Impact on Pedestrian Street Vitality: Beijing–Chengdu Comparison
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mix Design-Driven Control of Carbonation and Hydration in CO2-Mixed Cement Pastes: Effects of Water, Slag, and Surfactant

1
State Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Built Environment, National Engineering Research Center of Building Technology, Beijing 100013, China
2
Key Laboratory of Advanced Civil Engineering Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 4800 Cao’an Road, Shanghai 201804, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(12), 2116; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122116
Submission received: 25 May 2025 / Revised: 11 June 2025 / Accepted: 16 June 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025

Abstract

This study systematically investigates the influence of mix proportion on and the early-age properties and CO2 uptake of CO2-mixed cement paste, focusing on variations in the water-to-binder (w/b) ratio, slag content, and air-entraining agent (AEA) dosage. Mineralogical characteristics were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), while pore structures were assessed via nitrogen adsorption. CO2 uptake was quantified immediately after mixing. Results indicate that a low w/b ratio limits CO2 dissolution and transport, favors hydration over carbonation, and leads to a coarser pore structure. At moderate w/b ratios, excess free water facilitates concurrent carbonation and hydration; however, thinner water films ultimately hinder CaCO3 precipitation and C-S-H nucleation. Slag contents up to 30% slightly suppress early carbonation and hydration, while higher dosages significantly delay both reactions and increase capillary porosity. An increasing AEA dosage stabilizes CO2 bubbles, suppressing immediate CO2 dissolution and reducing the early formation of carbonation and hydration products; excessive AEAs promotes bubble coalescence and results in an interconnected pore network. An optimized mix design, moderate water content, slag below 30%, and limited AEA dosage enhance the synergy between carbonation and hydration, improving early pore refinement and reaction kinetics.

1. Introduction

The rapid rise in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions has intensified the need for carbon mitigation strategies. Cement manufacturing, as one of the most prevalent industrial processes, contributes approximately 9% of global CO2 emissions, positioning it as a critical sector for decarbonization [1]. Among emerging strategies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) integrated into cement and concrete production has attracted substantial interest for its scalability and efficiency [2,3].
Within this context, CO2 curing and CO2 mixing have emerged as promising technologies due to their capacity to induce stable mineralization and reduce the carbon footprint of concrete products. In particular, direct CO2 injection during the mixing of fresh cementitious materials has shown potential to lower emissions by approximately 10% through the accelerated carbonation of clinker and hydration products [4,5,6]. Furthermore, the in situ formation of nano-CaCO3 can serve as nucleation sites for C-S-H growth, promoting early-age strength development [7,8].
Previous studies have explored the influence of process parameters such as CO2 dosage [7,9,10], injection timing [11], and mixing duration [12], as well as alternative carbon sources like dry ice or carbonated water [13,14,15]. However, while the mixing setup has been extensively studied, the effects of mix proportion remain underexplored in the context of CO2 mixing.
To address this knowledge gap, this study investigates how varying mix design parameters affects the hydration, pore structure, and CO2 uptake of mixtures with various water-to-binder (w/b) ratios, slag contents, and air entraining agent (AEA) dosages considered. AEAs are used to stabilize the microbubbles within fresh cement paste that are introduced through CO2 mixing, potentially enhancing the gas–liquid interfacial area and improving CO2 dispersion during mixing. Different AEAs vary in their surfactant chemistry and can influence CO2 solubility and bubble stability differently. In this study, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), an anionic surfactant with well-known foaming properties, was selected due to its compatibility with cementitious systems and its effectiveness in stabilizing CO2 bubbles, as supported by prior studies [16,17]. Mineralogical analyses were conducted using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and pore characteristics were evaluated via nitrogen adsorption. The results provide new insights into how the synergy between carbonation and hydration can be optimized through mix design for the improved sustainability and performance of cementitious materials.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

P•I Portland cement and grade S95 ground granulated blast furnace slag conforming to Chinese standards GB 175 [18] and GB/T 18046 [19] which are manufactured by zhongjiaojianyi Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), respectively, were used as binders. Deionized water served as the mixing water. The chemical compositions of cement and slag, determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), are listed in Table 1. Their particle size distributions are shown in Figure 1.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., was used as the AEA. High-purity CO2 gas (99.99%) was supplied by Wen Dong (Shanghai) chemicals Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Mix Proportions and Sample Preparation

Cement pastes were prepared under various mixing conditions, as summarized in Table 2. The mixing protocol followed the procedure described in [20]. Cement, slag, and the AEA were pre-blended in sealed containers prior to mixing. For CO2 mixing, CO2 gas was introduced continuously during the first 90 s of mixing. To directly evaluate the impact of CO2 mixing on the performance of cement pastes with various mixing proportions, samples were submerged in ethanal to halt further hydration immediately after mixing, after which samples were vacuum dried for 48 h.

2.3. Testing Method

2.3.1. XRD

Powder XRD analysis was conducted using a Bruker D6 PHASER diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation. Samples were vacuum-dried, ground to below 75 μm, and mixed with 20 wt% corundum as an internal standard. Scanning was performed from 5° to 70° (2θ) at a 0.02° step size and 0.5 s per step. Quantitative phase analysis was carried out via Rietveld refinement.

2.3.2. TGA

TGA was performed using a NETZSCH STA 2500 instrument. Approximately 30 mg of ground sample was heated from 30 °C to 1000 °C at 10 °C/min under a flowing nitrogen atmosphere.

2.3.3. Nitrogen Adsorption

The pore structure of hardened pastes at 72 h was characterized using a BEISHIDE 3H-2000PS2 BET analyzer. Nitrogen adsorption measurements were taken at 77.3 K over a relative pressure range of 0.05–0.30 using a six-point isotherm method.

2.3.4. CO2 Uptake

The apparent CO2 uptake (ACU) of samples was calculated from TGA data using the following equation [21]:
A C U = m 550   ° C m 1000   ° C 0.44 × m i n i t i a l m 30   ° C × 100 %
where m 30 ° C , m 550 ° C , and m 1000 ° C are the sample masses at corresponding temperatures. m i n i t i a l is the initial mass of CaCO3 in cement.
For slag-containing samples, the ACU was corrected as
A C U = m 550   ° C m 1000   ° C 0.44 × ( m i n i t i a l + m i n i t i a l , s l a g ) m 30   ° C × 100 %
where m i n i t i a l , s l a g represents the pre-existing CaCO3 content in slag.

3. Results

3.1. Mineral Composition

3.1.1. XRD Analysis

Figure 2 presents the XRD patterns and corresponding quantitative phase analysis of cement pastes immediately after mixing. Minor phases such as quartz and periclase are grouped under “others” for clarity. The amorphous content primarily includes C-S-H gel, monosulfoaluminate, and unreacted slag [22].
Compared with the control sample (A), the CO2-mixed sample (C) shows decreased contents of clinker phases (C3S, C2S) and gypsum, indicating accelerated dissolution under CO2-rich conditions [23]. Concurrently, the reduction in portlandite (CH) and the increase in calcite and ettringite (AFt) suggest carbonation and altered ion equilibria due to the presence of carbonic acid.
Effect of Water-to-Binder Ratio (Figure 2a):
As the w/b ratio decreases from 0.50 to 0.35, the relative contents of clinker and gypsum increase, while those of calcite and AFt decrease. This indicates that CO2 dissolution and associated carbonation reactions are suppressed at lower w/b ratios due to reduced aqueous phase volume and limited ion mobility. The lowered undersaturation for calcium and silicate species also hinders dissolution and nucleation processes during early hydration.
Effect of Slag Content (Figure 2b):
The incorporation of slag leads to a rise in amorphous content due to its glassy phase. However, increasing slag content reduces calcite formation, attributed to a dilution effect and a lower availability of reactive CaO, which together hinder early carbonation [24].
Effect of AEA Dosage (Figure 2c):
With increasing SDS dosage, calcite and AFt contents decline, while clinker contents rise. This trend suggests that SDS stabilizes CO2 bubbles in suspension, limiting their dissolution and subsequent carbonation. Moreover, SDS modifies the gas–liquid interface, impeding CO2 diffusion into the pore solution [16].

3.1.2. TGA/DTG Analysis

Figure 3 displays the TGA/DTG curves of samples. Key endothermic peaks appear at ~110 °C (C-S-H and AFt dehydration), ~160 °C (gypsum dehydration), ~460 °C (CH dehydration), and ~680 °C (CaCO3 decarbonation), with the relative masses at different temperatures illustrated in Table 3 [25].
Compared with the control sample, sample C shows enhanced peaks at 110 °C and 680 °C, indicating an increased formation of C-S-H/AFt and carbonates, while the CH peak is diminished, confirming the competitive consumption of Ca2+ by carbonation.
Effect of Water-to-Binder Ratio (Figure 3a):
Decreasing the w/b ratio reduces the intensity of the first (C-S-H/AFt) and third (carbonate) peaks, reflecting reduced carbonation. The CH peak initially increases at w/b = 0.45, then declines, indicating an optimal hydration–carbonation balance around this ratio. Excessively low water content (<0.40) slows both hydration and carbonation.
Effect of Slag Content (Figure 3b):
All hydration-related peaks decrease with higher slag content, suggesting reduced reactivity. While the main CaCO3 peak weakens, a broader peak at >800 °C becomes more prominent, indicating the formation of more stable polymorphs such as aragonite or vaterite [26]. The reduced OH release from slag lowers alkalinity, suppressing CO32− formation and favoring dissolved carbonic acid retention.
Effect of AEA Dosage (Figure 3c):
Samples with increasing SDS content show diminishing peaks for C-S-H/AFt and carbonate. The CH peak reduction caused by CO2 injection is also less pronounced at higher SDS dosages. This supports the view that stabilized CO2 bubbles reduce gas dissolution, thereby limiting both carbonation and hydration kinetics. Additionally, SDS may chelate Ca2+, further suppressing CH and C-S-H precipitation.

3.2. Pore Structure Analysis

Figure 4 presents nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms for cement pastes cured for 72 h. All samples exhibit a steep increase in adsorption within the relative pressure range P/P0 = 0.48~1.0, suggesting the dominance of capillary and transition pores. The cumulative pore volume and pore size distribution of samples are shown in Figure 5. Compared to the control sample, sample C exhibits a higher cumulative pore volume in the 2 nm–200 nm range, primarily due to an increased pore size distribution peak between 30 nm and 70 nm. This suggests that CO2 mixing predominantly enhances the volume of transition pores (10 nm–100 nm [27]) within the cement paste matrix.
Effect of Water-to-Binder Ratio (Figure 5a):
The sample with a w/b ratio of 0.45 shows the highest cumulative pore volume, indicating enhanced pore connectivity at this intermediate water content. As the w/b ratio decreases, the pore size distribution broadens and shifts toward larger pores (100 nm–1000 nm), reflecting increased capillary porosity. This shift results from a reduced CO2 uptake (limiting nano-CaCO3 nucleation) and reduced fluidity of fresh paste, leading to poor particle packing and a less dense microstructure [28].
Effect of Slag Content (Figure 5b):
Samples with slag contents of 10% and 30% exhibit minimal changes in total porosity. However, at 50% slag content (C-S5), the cumulative pore volume increases markedly, especially for pores >20 nm. This increase is attributed to lower cement content and hinders early C-S-H formation, which delays pore refinement.
Effect of AEA Dosage (Figure 5c):
The incorporation of SDS increases cumulative pore volume due to the stabilization of entrained CO2 bubbles. At 0.4% dosage (C-SDS0.4), the total porosity is the highest, dominated by pores >20 nm. The unexpected result in Figure 5c, where C-SDS0.4 shows a higher pore volume than C-SDS0.6, may be attributed to the non-linear behavior of SDS at high concentrations. Excessive SDS may lead to micelle formation, reducing surface activity and limiting additional bubble stabilization. Additionally, the excessive AEA dosage leads to bubble coalescence and upward migration, reducing effective CO2 utilization and creating interconnected voids. Over time, these bubbles may either escape or collapse, contributing to the formation of larger pores.

3.3. CO2 Uptake

The ACU of samples was calculated from TGA data and is summarized in Figure 6.
Effect of Water-to-Binder Ratio:
A clear inverse correlation exists between CO2 uptake and the w/b ratio. As the ratio decreases from 0.50 to 0.35, the ACU declines by 40.4%. This reduction reflects limited aqueous volume for CO2 dissolution and reduced ion mobility, which hinder carbonation during mixing.
Effect of Slag Content:
Slag incorporation produces a non-linear trend. The ACU initially decreases slightly with 10–30% slag content, reaching a minimum (4.9% reduction) at 30% (C-S3), which appears to be the most favorable blend. Beyond this threshold, further slag addition significantly reduces carbonation, likely due to the dilution of reactive Ca2+ sources and reduced alkalinity.
Effect of AEA Dosage:
Increasing SDS dosage from 0.2% to 0.6% significantly suppresses the ACU, with reductions ranging from 52.1% to 75.3% relative to the sample C. This substantial decrease confirms that the bubble-stabilizing action of AEAs limits CO2 dissolution and impedes early carbonate formation.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Water-to-Binder Ratio

The w/b ratio plays a dual role in CO2-mixed cement systems by simultaneously affecting hydration kinetics and carbonation efficiency. At moderate w/b ratios, sufficient free water facilitates the rapid dissolution of CO2, allowing its transformation into HCO3 and CO32− ions, which diffuse to cement particle surfaces and precipitate as CaCO3. This process occurs concurrently with hydration, supporting the nucleation and growth of C-S-H and AFt [29,30].
However, as the w/b ratio decreases, the reduced volume of pore solution limits CO2 solubility and ion mobility, which suppresses the formation of CaCO3 and delays carbonation [31]. This shift favors hydration as the dominant reaction pathway, as evidenced by the reduced carbonate content and increased portlandite at intermediate ratios (Figure 3a).
The pore structure is also strongly influenced by water content. Insufficient water at low w/b ratios hinders the formation of nano-CaCO3 particles, reducing their nucleation effect for C-S-H formation and slowing early-age gel growth [32,33]. Additionally, lower paste fluidity leads to poor particle dispersion and increases voids due to entrapped air, resulting in a coarser pore network.

4.2. Effect of Slag Incorporation

Slag incorporation increases the amorphous fraction in the paste due to its glassy nature. However, high slag content (>30%) significantly reduces early-age carbonation and hydration. This effect arises from two main factors, namely (i) a dilution of clinker, which reduces reactive Ca2+ sources, and (ii) slower slag activation in early hydration stages, which contributes less to OH release and alkalinity, both essential for CaCO3 formation [34,35].
Although carbonation is suppressed, slag particles with a high surface area provide nucleation sites for late-stage hydration and carbonation [36]. This may partially compensate for early reductions in reaction rates but does not prevent the broadening of pore size distribution observed in high-slag mixes (Figure 5b). Thus, an optimal slag content near 30% achieves a balance between reduced CO2 uptake and preserved matrix integrity.

4.3. Effect of AEA Incorporation

The addition of SDS significantly alters carbonation behavior and pore development. As a surfactant, SDS adsorbs at gas–liquid interfaces, stabilizing CO2 bubbles and preventing their rapid dissolution. This inhibits the immediate formation of carbonic acid and, consequently, carbonate precipitation.
The AEA preferentially adsorbs at the air–liquid interface, reducing surface tension and creating a stabilizing film around gas bubbles [37,38]. For the gas phase in fresh paste, this film suspends CO2 bubbles, significantly decreasing the rate of CO2 dissolution into the pore solution immediately after mixing. With fewer dissolved CO2 particles available to form carbonic acid, the carbonation around the cement particle surface is delayed. Beyond the bubble stabilization, the complexation effect of the AEA in a solution partially bonds with Ca2+; as an excessively high dosage of AEA is added, it decreases the precipitation of hydration and carbonation products [39].
Moreover, SDS may complex with Ca2+ ions in a solution, reducing their availability for hydration and carbonation reactions. The result is a marked reduction in early reaction products, as seen in both XRD and TGA data (Figure 2c and Figure 3c). Excessive AEAs leads to bubble coalescence and upward migration, forming interconnected voids that increase total porosity (Figure 5c).
The pore network generated by entrained CO2 bubbles shifts the dominant pore size to >20 nm, compromising mechanical performance and increasing permeability. Therefore, AEA dosage must be carefully optimized to avoid the degradation of structural integrity while ensuring effective gas distribution.

5. Conclusions

This study systematically investigated the influence of mix proportion, specifically the w/b ratio, slag content, and AEA dosage, on the carbonation behavior, hydration, pore structure, and CO2 uptake of cement paste subjected to CO2 mixing. The following key conclusions are drawn:
(1)
Lower w/b ratios limit CO2 dissolution and mass transport, shifting the reaction pathway toward hydration. This results in reduced carbonate formation and coarser pore structures. At moderate w/b ratios, concurrent carbonation and hydration are promoted, but excessively low water content hinders both reaction kinetics and pore refinement.
(2)
Incorporating slag increases the amorphous content and influences early-age reaction rates. Up to 30% slag causes minimal reductions in carbonation and hydration. However, higher contents significantly delay both processes and lead to wider capillary pores due to the dilution of reactive phases and reduced alkalinity.
(3)
Increasing SDS dosage stabilizes CO2 bubbles but significantly reduces immediate CO2 dissolution and associated reaction products. Entrained gas increases porosity, particularly in the 20 nm–200 nm range, and promotes an interconnected pore network if overdosed.
(4)
The early-age performance of CO2-mixed cement paste depends on a well-balanced mix design. A moderate w/b ratio, slag content below 30%, and restrained AEA dosage collectively enhance carbonation–hydration synergy, improve pore structure, and support effective CO2 sequestration.
These findings provide a scientific basis for tailoring mix designs to maximize early-age performance and CO2 sequestration efficiency in carbonated cement-based systems. The insights are particularly valuable for developing low-carbon concrete technologies aligned with carbon neutrality goals in the construction industry.

Author Contributions

Methodology, H.M.; Formal analysis, H.M.; Investigation, J.X. and C.L.; Writing—original draft, J.X. and C.L.; Writing—review & editing, Q.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC3803104), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52308274), the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2024QNRC001), the Opening Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Built Environment & National Engineering Research Center of Building Technology, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Data Availability Statement

The research data are available when requested.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC3803104), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52308274), the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2024QNRC001), the Opening Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Built Environment & National Engineering Research Center of Building Technology, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The authors acknowledge the Experimental Center of Materials Science and Engineering at Tongji University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Monteiro, P.J.M.; Miller, S.A.; Horvath, A. Towards sustainable concrete. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 698–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Churkina, G.; Organschi, A.; Reyer, C.P.O.; Ruff, A.; Vinke, K.; Liu, Z.; Reck, B.K.; Graedel, T.E.; Schellnhuber, H.J. Buildings as a global carbon sink. Nat. Sustain. 2020, 3, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheng, D.; Reiner, D.M.; Yang, F.; Cui, C.; Meng, J.; Shan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tao, S.; Guan, D. Projecting future carbon emissions from cement production in developing countries. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rostami, V.; Shao, Y.; Boyd, A.J.; He, Z. Microstructure of cement paste subject to early carbonation curing. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lippiatt, N.; Ling, T.-C.; Eggermont, S. Combining hydration and carbonation of cement using super-saturated aqueous CO2 solution. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 229, 116825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, Z.; Li, Z.; Shao, Y. Effect of Carbonation Mixing on CO2 Uptake and Strength Gain in Concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2017, 29, 04017176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Monkman, S.; Lee, B.E.J.; Grandfield, K.; MacDonald, M.; Raki, L. The impacts of in-situ carbonate seeding on the early hydration of tricalcium silicate. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 136, 106179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rashid, S.; Singh, M. An Investigation on Carbon Dioxide Incorporated Sustainable Ready-Mix Concrete Using OPC and PPC. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2023, 48, 14213–14236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Monkman, S.; Sargam, Y.; Naboka, O.; Lothenbach, B. Early age impacts of CO2 activation on the tricalcium silicate and cement systems. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 65, 102254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Monkman, S.; Hwang, S.D.; Khayat, K. Rheology modification of flowable mortar with CO2. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 151, 105584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, S.; Yuan, Q.; Ni, J.; Shi, C.; Zheng, K.; Tan, J. Study of CO2 Injection Timing within the Mixing Process of Ready-Mix Concrete for Win–Win Improvements of Mechanical Properties and CO2 Sequestration. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 1480–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, M.; Luo, S.; Pham, B.T.; Ling, T.-C. Effect of CO2-mixing dose and prolonged mixing time on fresh and hardened properties of cement pastes. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci 2023, 24, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; He, F.; Yang, L. Influence of dry ice on the performance of Portland cement and its mechanism. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 188, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xuan, M.-Y.; Lee, S.-H.; Hu, H.-Q.; Wang, X.-Y. Adding dry ice into ultra-high-performance concrete to enhance engineering performances and lower CO2 emissions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 392, 131858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kwasny, J.; Basheer, P.A.M.; Russell, M.; Doherty, W.; Owens, K.; Ward, N. CO2 sequestration in cement-based materials during mixing process using carbonated water and gaseous CO2. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Durability of Concrete Structures, ICDCS, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 24–26 July 2014; pp. 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fan, D.; Lu, J.-X.; Lv, X.-S.; Noguchi, T.; Yu, R.; Poon, C.S. Carbon capture and storage CO2 foam concrete towards higher performance: Design, preparation and characteristics. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2025, 157, 105925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, G.; Lu, W.; Liu, H.; Wen, X. Performance and mechanism of carbon sequestration of air-entraining wet shotcrete. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 96, 110623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. GB 175; Common Portland Cement. Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2023.
  19. GB/T 18046; Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Used for Cement, Mortar and Concrete. Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2017.
  20. Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, Q.; Jiang, Z. Early-age hydration of cement paste prepared with CO2 mixing under varying pressures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 472, 140948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Scrivener, K.; Snellings, R.; Lothenbach, B. A Practical Guide to Microstructural Analysis of Cementitious Materials; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shah, V.; Scrivener, K.; Bhattacharjee, B.; Bishnoi, S. Changes in microstructure characteristics of cement paste on carbonation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 109, 184–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qian, X.; Wang, J.; Fang, Y.; Wang, L. Carbon dioxide as an admixture for better performance of OPC-based concrete. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 25, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lothenbach, B.; Scrivener, K.; Hooton, R.D. Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. De Weerdt, K.; Plusquellec, G.; Belda Revert, A.; Geiker, M.R.; Lothenbach, B. Effect of carbonation on the pore solution of mortar. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 118, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zajac, M.; Irbe, L.; Bullerjahn, F.; Hilbig, H.; Ben Haha, M. Mechanisms of carbonation hydration hardening in Portland cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2022, 152, 106687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, Y.; Liu, C.; Bai, G.; Liu, H.; Meng, Y.; Wang, Z. 3D printed concrete with recycled sand: Pore structures and triaxial compression properties. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 139, 105048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, Y.; Shen, K.; Zhu, H.; Hu, C.; Wang, F. Unveiling the synergistic effect of in-situ generated calcium carbonate by CO2 mixing on the reaction of calcined clay. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 148, 105490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, L.; Ji, Y.; Gao, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X. Study on high-efficiency CO2 absorption by fresh cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 270, 121364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, M.J.; Lee, M.G.; Wang, Y.C.; Su, Y.M.; Deng, J.L. Preliminary Study on Reaction of Fresh Concrete with Carbon Dioxide. Defect Diffus. Forum 2018, 382, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Davolio, M.; Muciaccia, G.; Ferrara, L. Concrete carbon mixing—A systematic review on the processes and their effects on the material performance. Clean. Mater. 2025, 15, 100292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Borges, P.H.R.; Costa, J.O.; Milestone, N.B.; Lynsdale, C.J.; Streatfield, R.E. Carbonation of CH and C–S–H in composite cement pastes containing high amounts of BFS. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.-C.; Lee, M.-G.; Wang, W.-C.; Kan, Y.-C.; Kao, S.-H.; Chang, H.-W. CO2 Curing on the Mechanical Properties of Portland Cement Concrete. Buildings 2022, 12, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scrivener, K.L.; Juilland, P.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Advances in understanding hydration of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bucher, R.; Cyr, M.; Escadeillas, G. Carbonation of Blended Binders Containing Metakaolin. In Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete; Scrivener, K., Favier, A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mutti, M.; Joseph, S.; Snellings, R.; Cizer, Ö. Effect of slag pre-carbonation on its early-age reactivity in alkali activated binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ke, G.; Zhang, J.; Tian, B.; Wang, J. Characteristic analysis of concrete air entraining agents in different media. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 135, 106142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cao, L.; Shi, F.; Qiu, M.; Chen, W.; Cao, P.; Zhou, C. Effects of air entraining agent on the rheological properties and electrochemical parameters of cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 344, 128233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wong, H.S.; Pappas, A.M.; Zimmerman, R.W.; Buenfeld, N.R. Effect of entrained air voids on the microstructure and mass transport properties of concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Particle size distributions of cement and slag.
Figure 1. Particle size distributions of cement and slag.
Buildings 15 02116 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns and quantified phase contents for samples with varying (a) w/b ratios, (b) slag contents, and (c) AEA dosages. (Notation: A = C3S; B = C2S; C = calcite; E = AFt; F = C4AF; G = gypsum; H = CH; a = C3A; α = corundum.)
Figure 2. XRD patterns and quantified phase contents for samples with varying (a) w/b ratios, (b) slag contents, and (c) AEA dosages. (Notation: A = C3S; B = C2S; C = calcite; E = AFt; F = C4AF; G = gypsum; H = CH; a = C3A; α = corundum.)
Buildings 15 02116 g002
Figure 3. TGA/DTG curves of samples with different (a) w/b ratios, (b) slag contents, and (c) AEA dosages.
Figure 3. TGA/DTG curves of samples with different (a) w/b ratios, (b) slag contents, and (c) AEA dosages.
Buildings 15 02116 g003
Figure 4. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of samples.
Figure 4. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of samples.
Buildings 15 02116 g004
Figure 5. Pore structure of samples with varying (a) w/b ratios, (b) slag contents, and (c) AEA dosages.
Figure 5. Pore structure of samples with varying (a) w/b ratios, (b) slag contents, and (c) AEA dosages.
Buildings 15 02116 g005
Figure 6. ACU of carbonated cement paste under various CO2 mixing conditions.
Figure 6. ACU of carbonated cement paste under various CO2 mixing conditions.
Buildings 15 02116 g006
Table 1. Chemical compositions of cement and slag (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of cement and slag (wt.%).
CaOSiO2Al2O3SO3Fe2O3MgOK2OLOI
Cement64.618.34.63.63.53.20.81.4
Slag51.321.414.11.71.36.30.51.3
Table 2. Mixing proportions of sample.
Table 2. Mixing proportions of sample.
SampleMixing
Atmosphere
Water-to-Binder RatioSlag ContentAEA Dosage
AAir0.50//
CCO20.50//
C-0.45CO20.45//
C-0.40CO20.40//
C-0.35CO20.35//
C-S1CO20.5010%/
C-S3CO20.5030%/
C-S5CO20.5050%/
C-SDS0.2CO20.50/0.2%
C-SDS0.4CO20.50/0.4%
C-SDS0.6CO20.50/0.6%
Table 3. Mass loss at various temperatures.
Table 3. Mass loss at various temperatures.
SampleRelative Mass at Different Temperature/%
350 °C550 °C1000 °C
A98.7698.2797.01
C97.9197.5395.39
C−0.4598.1697.7695.84
C−0.4098.5598.2396.36
C−0.3598.3798.0996.30
C−S198.5298.2996.43
C−S398.6298.1596.00
C−S598.8498.5396.70
C−SDS0.298.4197.8596.38
C−SDS0.498.3897.6695.98
C−SDS0.698.5298.0196.52
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, J.; Li, C.; Ma, H.; Ren, Q. Mix Design-Driven Control of Carbonation and Hydration in CO2-Mixed Cement Pastes: Effects of Water, Slag, and Surfactant. Buildings 2025, 15, 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122116

AMA Style

Xia J, Li C, Ma H, Ren Q. Mix Design-Driven Control of Carbonation and Hydration in CO2-Mixed Cement Pastes: Effects of Water, Slag, and Surfactant. Buildings. 2025; 15(12):2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Jingliang, Chunjin Li, Haoyuan Ma, and Qiang Ren. 2025. "Mix Design-Driven Control of Carbonation and Hydration in CO2-Mixed Cement Pastes: Effects of Water, Slag, and Surfactant" Buildings 15, no. 12: 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122116

APA Style

Xia, J., Li, C., Ma, H., & Ren, Q. (2025). Mix Design-Driven Control of Carbonation and Hydration in CO2-Mixed Cement Pastes: Effects of Water, Slag, and Surfactant. Buildings, 15(12), 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop