You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Buildings
  • Review
  • Open Access

13 June 2024

A Review of Research Progress on the Impact of Urban Street Environments on Physical Activity: A Comparison between China and Developed Countries

,
,
and
School of Arts and Design, Yanshan University, 438, West Section of Hebei Avenue, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Healthy Environment Design in Urban Development

Abstract

Creating healthy street environments to encourage physical activity is an effective strategy against non-communicable diseases exacerbated by rapid urbanization globally. Developing countries face more significant health challenges than developed ones. However, existing research predominantly focuses on the perspective of developed countries. To address the health challenges in developing nations, studies should not only draw on the findings from developed countries but also clearly define unique research processes and pathways. Consequently, this study conducts a comparative analysis between China, representing developing countries, and developed nations, using databases like China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science (WOS) and tools such as Citespace, Bicomb, and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to explore research hotspots, developmental trajectories, thematic categories, and trends. The findings reveal a shift in developed countries from macro-material to micro-environmental elements under multidisciplinary scrutiny, while future topics may include street space evaluations and psychological healing. In China, research has been dominated by different disciplines at various stages, starting with medical attention to chronic disease prevention, which then shifted to traffic engineering’s focus on constructing green travel environments, and finally expanded to disciplines like landscape architecture examining the impact of street environment elements on pedestrian behavioural perceptions. Future themes will focus on promoting elderly health and urban health transport systems. Generally, research in developed countries exhibits a “bottom-up” approach, with practical issues at a “post-evaluation” stage, primarily based on the “socio-ecological model” and emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration. Chinese research shows a “top-down” characteristic, driven by national policies and at a “pre-planning” stage, integrating theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and attention restoration theory, with relatively loose disciplinary cooperation. Overall, research is shifting from macro to human-centric scales and is progressively utilizing multi-source and multi-scale big data analysis methods. Based on this, future research and development recommendations are proposed for developing countries, with China as a representative example.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely impacted global health, hindering progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals []. In 2023, the first Healthy City Partnership Summit in London brought together mayors and officials from over fifty major cities. The summit highlighted the renewed focus on non-communicable diseases and injuries three years after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, noting that cities have unique advantages in combating non-communicable diseases and reducing injuries by implementing policies that significantly reduce exposure to risk factors, thus helping the world return to the trajectory of the Sustainable Development Goals []. The global urbanization rate is expected to rise to 68% by 2050 [], with an additional 2.5 billion urban inhabitants. Most of this urban population growth will occur in developing countries, especially in China, India, and Nigeria []. Issues such as poor sanitation, air pollution, road safety, and limited access to healthy food and spaces during urbanization elevate the risk of non-communicable diseases []. Non-communicable diseases cause 41 million deaths annually, accounting for 74% of all deaths globally, with 77% occurring in low- and middle-income countries []. These countries face more severe health challenges than developed nations due to several factors: a lack of quality healthcare services, inadequate social welfare systems, insufficient dissemination of disease prevention knowledge, and the rapid progression of urbanization and aging populations []. The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified urbanization as one of the leading public health challenges of the 21st century []. Evidence-based medical research has proven that a lack of physical activity is one of the top ten global death risk factors [] and increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour could prevent at least 3.2 million deaths related to non-communicable diseases globally each year []. WHO has emphasized that urban planning should actively contribute to addressing health challenges, highlighting that “health must be a primary focus for urban planners” []. Streets, as a crucial component of urban spaces, can directly influence human health by providing residents with comfortable venues for physical activity [,]. They can also indirectly promote health by reducing factors that potentially impact traffic accidents, thereby ensuring the safety of residents’ activities [,]. Health-oriented street design is an effective way to foster the creation of healthy cities [].
As the world’s largest developing country, over the past 40 years, China has seen its urbanization rate increase from 17.92% to 65.2% [], which exceeds significantly that of other countries during the same period, making it one of the fastest urbanizing countries globally []. According to United Nations projections, China’s urbanization rate will reach 74% by 2035, meaning that, in the next decade, over 100 million rural inhabitants will move to urban areas [], resulting in a vast urban population. Like other developing countries, China faces health challenges due to shifts in disease patterns and an aging population. Non-communicable diseases have become the most significant health threat to Chinese citizens, accounting for approximately 88.5% of all deaths []. Additionally, due to the rapid development of the automotive industry, the physical environment of streets, including air quality and urban transportation infrastructure, complicates the risk of incidence and disease prevention efforts. The task of building healthy cities in China is unprecedented in its enormity and complexity. To address this challenge, the Chinese government has steadfastly implemented the policy of “integrating health into all policies” to promote the implementation of health governance measures. In 2016, the Chinese State Council issued the “Healthy China 2030” blueprint outline, placing health as a strategic priority in national development. This plan significantly measures China’s active participation in global health governance and fulfilling its commitments to the United Nations’ “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” []. In 2018, China established the “National Health City Evaluation Indicator System” and began health city evaluations based on this system []. In 2019, the “Opinions of the State Council on Implementing the Healthy China Action” were promulgated, which specified measures in the area of national fitness and health to prevent and control road traffic injuries. Other related documents have also proposed strengthening the construction of urban greenways, fitness trails, and other health-oriented living environments []. In 2021, the State Council issued the “National Fitness Plan (2021–2025)”, which set forth requirements for enhancing the public service system for national fitness and making sports and fitness activities more accessible to the public []. This reflects the emphasis, on a national scale, on creating a healthy urban environment that promotes residents’ physical activity.
Physical activity (PA) refers to any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure. The urban street environment includes the physical environment (natural and artificially modified built environment) and social environment (such as social norms and community cohesion). It is an essential factor that affects people’s physical activity and is also an important entry point for cities to intervene in people’s health proactively. Scholars from various fields, including public health and preventive medicine [], ecology [], urban planning [], and sports science [], have extensively and deeply researched the impacts of land mix use [], street connectivity [], walkability [], and the built environment [] on physical activity. However, current research is primarily concentrated in developed countries, such as the United States (which accounts for 44.1% of publications) and Australia (11.9% of publications). Among developing countries, China produces the most research in this field, with its output second only to the United States (16.9% of publications). As these research interests span multiple disciplines, the related literature is extensive and dispersed across various journals. Considering the differences in development stages and planning governance methods between countries, the practical directions, pathways, and depth of research on the impacts of street environments on physical activity vary, yet discussions on this topic have not been previously synthesized. Additionally, existing review articles mainly organize and evaluate research on the impact of urban architectural environments and green spaces on physical activity among different age groups. For instance, Zhang et al. used a narrative review method to summarize existing reviews on the association between architectural environments and physical activity among children, adults, and the elderly []. Prince et al. systematically described the current status, intensity, and quality of research on the association between the built environment and adult physical activity in high-income countries []. Ran et al. used Citespace and VOSviewer software for a bibliometric analysis of the association between urban green space features and the occurrence of leisure physical activity [].
In conclusion, compared to developed countries, developing nations face more pronounced health challenges. Current research on the “impact of street environments on physical activity” is primarily conducted from the perspective of developed countries. However, due to differences in political systems, socioeconomic environments, urban infrastructure, and demographic structures between developing and developed countries, the research findings based on developed countries’ contexts are not entirely applicable to developing nations. To address the health challenges faced by developing countries, it is necessary to both draw on the research outcomes from developed countries and to clearly define national research agendas and approaches, thereby more actively addressing the foreseeable health challenges in the process of urbanization. Therefore, the study selects China as representative of developing countries to conduct comparative research with developed countries. Using a systematic review methodology and applying software tools such as Citespace (version 6.2.R6), Bibliographic Items Co-occurrence Matrix Builder (Bicomb) 2.0, and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 27.0, the study performs a systematic summary of research hotspots for studies in China and developed countries, organizes the development trajectories and thematic categories, and scientifically predicts research trends. This analysis deeply explores the differences between research in China and developed countries and the reasons for these differences (as shown in Figure 1). The findings provide a reliable basis and inspiration for future research by Chinese scholars, helping international scholars to deeply understand the current state of research on the impact of street environments on physical activity within the Chinese context.
Figure 1. Research pathway.
Accordingly, the structure of this paper is as follows: Section 2 provides an overview of the research materials and methods; Section 3 presents the research hotspots, development contexts, thematic categories, and trends in China and developed countries; Section 4 delves into the similarities and differences between the research in China and developed countries, explores the reasons for these differences, and proposes future directions for research in China; Section 5 concludes the paper.

2. Research Methods

2.1. Literature Selection

The study separately conducted literature searches on the impact of street environments on physical activity in developed countries and China. For English-language literature, the search was conducted using the Web of Science (WOS) core database with the search formula ((TS = (street)) AND TS = (physical activity)) AND PY = (1996–2023). The search included the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E), the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), and the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI), which were limited to English-language literature. Subsequently, by excluding literature irrelevant to the study of street environments’ impact on physical activity based on titles and abstracts, 1484 entries were retrieved. For Chinese-language literature, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database was utilized, which is the largest continuously updated database of Chinese academic literature [], effectively supplementing the English database and providing a comprehensive view of research in China. To ensure the quality of the papers, journals indexed by Science Citation Index (SCI) or Engineering Index (EI) and core journals from Peking University, Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) journals, and Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) journals were selected, covering the period from 1993 to 2023. The search terms used were “street” AND “physical activity”, initially yielding 17 papers. Further searches with expanded thematic keywords, such as “urban” AND “physical activity”, “street” AND “slow traffic”, and “urban” AND “slow traffic”, were conducted, and titles and abstracts were again screened to exclude irrelevant studies, ultimately resulting in 700 papers.

2.2. Research Steps

Firstly, data handling was carried out, wherein the literature data from WOS and CNKI were preprocessed using the Citespace (version 6.2.R6) built-in data converter. To ensure accuracy, after the format conversion, data from WOS and CNKI were filtered to remove duplicates, with 1434 English-language papers and 665 Chinese-language papers determined to be valid. In the second step, research hotspots were identified. The filtered data were imported into Citespace (version 6.2.R6) for bibliometric analysis, setting the time slice to one year and selecting “Keyword” as the node type, and keyword co-occurrence analysis was conducted separately for international and Chinese research fields related to the impact of street environments on physical activity. Furthermore, development trajectories were constructed. Both English- and Chinese-language literature annual publication volumes were visualized using Excel. Based on this, along with the keyword time zone distribution map and keyword prominence map generated by Citespace (version 6.2.R6), the development trajectories of research on the impact of street environments on physical activity in international and Chinese contexts were established. With regard to fourth step, a keyword clustering analysis was undertaken. Using Bicomb2.0, the data from both English- and Chinese-language literature were processed to identify high-frequency keywords and generate term–document matrices. After processing the term–document matrix data in Excel, they were imported into SPSS 27.0 software, where hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted to obtain dendrograms, followed by keyword clustering analysis. Finally, research trends were interpreted. By utilizing the multidimensional scaling feature in SPSS 27.0 software, multidimensional scaling analysis maps were constructed. These maps facilitate a scientific interpretation of research trends based on the distribution quadrants of keywords.

4. Comparative Analysis and Discussion

4.1. Development Context

Overall, the global research into and practice of healthy streets have transformed passive responses to survival challenges into proactive interventions for health benefits. A comparative analysis of research hotspots and development contexts in developed countries and China reveals differences in research perspectives, stages, theoretical foundations, and disciplinary backgrounds, while similarities are observed in research scales and methods (as shown in Table 7).
Table 7. Comparative analysis of research between developed countries and China.
Research perspectives: A comparison of high-frequency critical terms in research from developed countries (Table 1) and China (Table 2) reveals that, in addition to directly relevant keywords such as “physical activity”, “built environment”, and “public health”, high-frequency and high-centrality keywords in Chinese-language research also include “landscape architecture”, and “slow traffic”. Upon further examination of the relevant literature, it is found that the research perspective in China exhibits a “top-down” characteristic, with scholars predominantly guided by national policies. They analyse existing urban street design cases from a practical perspective or explore factors influencing physical activity through empirical research. Based on this, they provide optimization directions for design decisions, street design guidelines, transportation planning, and other policies, thereby guiding design implementation. Nevertheless, high-frequency keywords in international research also include “walking”, “obesity”, and “associations”. Combined with relevant literature, it is observed that research perspectives in developed countries demonstrate a “bottom-up” feature, with scholars focusing on developing targeted research questions from social life experiences. They primarily conduct causal mechanism studies on street space users, attempt to audit and evaluate already built street environments, and provide feedback on scientific issues, thereby influencing the formulation of urban planning and design policies.
Research stages: The differences in research perspectives indirectly reflect the different stages of research between China and developed countries. Research in China is mainly at the “pre-planning” stage, with the primary purpose being to provide the scientific basis for the planning guidelines and design decisions of healthy streets. Research in developed countries is mainly at the “post-assessment” stage, focusing on assessing and reviewing the healthy streets environment better to understand the mechanisms between street environments and physical activity.
Theoretical foundation: When reviewing the developmental context of research in developed countries and China, it is found that the theoretical foundation for environmental impacts on physical activity mainly originates from the Western academic realm’s “social-ecological theory model”. Internationally, this theoretical model has been utilized extensively for empirical research [,], demonstrating that multiple factors, including individual characteristics, material environmental factors, and social environmental factors, influence physical activity. However, Chinese scholars have applied this theoretical model less frequently, primarily remaining at the stage of literature review research [,,] and lacking relevant empirical studies. Chinese scholars primarily rely on psychological theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs [], attention restoration theory [], and Alfonso’s five-level system proposed in environmental psychology for walking experience—feasibility, accessibility, safety, comfort, and pleasure []—to conduct research on healthy streets environments. Due to the multitude of elements involved in the “social-ecological theory model” and the constantly changing factors affecting specific types of physical activity or under specific background conditions, there is often diversity in the influencing factors. Chinese scholars need to rely on the “social-ecological theory model” to explore the interactive effects and degrees of influence of objective material environments, social environments, and psychological and perceptual environments on behavioural activities within the Chinese context to clarify the direction of the theoretical model further.
Disciplinary background: Research in developed countries emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration starting from disciplinary issues. For example, the most representative initiative is the “Active Living by Design” (ALbD) national program launched by the United States to address public health issues. Sponsored sites establish interdisciplinary community partnerships, including public health, urban planning, traffic engineering, architecture, pedagogy, and other disciplines, to collectively assess existing policies and environmental conditions, develop strategic plans, identify favourable resources, and collaborate with governments, space users, and others to achieve the sharing of academic research and social practice network resources []. In contrast, research in China is influenced by national strategic development, exhibiting a phased transition dominated by different disciplines with loose interdisciplinary cooperation. This is manifested by applying research methods from other disciplines while the research content still belongs to the respective disciplines, representing a borrowing relationship between disciplines []. For instance, sports science employs GIS research methods from urban planning to explore the relationship between the density, distance, accessibility, and physical activity of built environment facilities [].
Research scope: By comparing the keyword timeline graphs of research in developed countries (Figure 6) and China (Figure 8), it is found that there is a trend towards transitioning from a macro-scale to a human-centred scale in the research scope. Specifically, there is a shift from focusing on the influence of aspects such as urban expansion, infrastructure, building density, land use mix, etc., on population physical activity [,,] to paying attention to the impact of factors such as street design elements, street space scale, distance to public facilities, etc., on population physical activity [,,].
Research methods: Both developed countries and China actively utilize multi-source and multi-scale big data, such as government open data, satellite remote sensing images, street view images, etc., combined with machine learning methods for large-scale data quantification analysis. However, research primarily focuses on the perspective of human visual perception, with fewer studies exploring the influence of olfactory and auditory landscape elements in street environments on physical activity. Moreover, existing empirical research mainly consists of static data analysis. It primarily explores the independent effects of single or multiple elements of the built environment on physical activity, neglecting the interactions between elements and temporal changes.
The reasons for the similarities and differences above are mainly reflected in the following three aspects: (1) Different urbanization development processes. Developed countries entered the late stage of urbanization by the end of the last century [] and had earlier encountered urban public health challenges, leading to corresponding research and practices. On the other hand, China has been undergoing rapid urban expansion and development over the past 40 years, with a relatively late focus on constructing a healthy urban environment, resulting in a lag in research compared to developed countries. Furthermore, as China is in the transitional period of urban construction, many planning guidelines are needed, which require scientific theories and empirical support for their formulation. Additionally, the government attaches great importance to urban health planning and construction, proposing policies and initiatives to promote urban health development, including strengthening urban pollution control, increasing urban greenery levels, promoting nationwide fitness activities, and improving pedestrian transportation systems. These directly or indirectly contribute to the development of research on the impact of urban street environments on physical activity in China, thus presenting a “top-down” research characteristic. (2) Changes in urban planning perspectives. The implementation and management of urban design in various countries are shifting from the “two-dimensional plane” to the “three-dimensional space”, focusing on the human scale, which refers to the urban scale closely related to the human body that people can see, touch, and feel. This is a deepening and necessary supplement to the current scales such as grids, blocks, and plots []. (3) Development and application of new technologies. Big data methods such as street view images and machine learning, as well as the application of accelerometers and wearable devices, are less time-consuming and cheaper than traditional methods (questionnaires, behavioural observation), allowing for larger sample sizes and providing technical support for human-scale research.

4.2. Theme Categories

Research on the impact of street environments on physical activity in developed countries is categorized into nine themes: “Studies on the promotional effect of physical activity on chronic disease prevention”, “Exploring factors that promote active travel among the public”, “Studying the impact of urban environmental hygiene on outdoor physical activity among the public”, “Exploring street environment factors influencing physical activity among the elderly population”, “Conducting environmental audits focusing on the micro-scale landscapes of streets”, “Exploring the impact of “Active Living by Design (ALbD)” on promoting community physical activity”, “Analysing landscape elements that influence pedestrian activity preferences using street view big data”, “Studying the impact of urban green spaces on people’s mental health”, and “Analysing the impact of urban built environment morphology on public behavioural activities”. Research in China is categorized into five themes: “Studies on the promotional effect of physical activity on chronic disease prevention”, “Exploring community environments conducive to physical activity for children”, “Studies on the impact of urban built environment on the health of elderly populations”, “Using big data methods to analyse the impact of street environments on physical activity”, and “Exploring urban transportation systems that promote human health development”.
Research on the impact of urban street environments on physical activity fundamentally explores the causal relationship between the environment and individuals. Through the comparison of thematic categories, the differences in content between research in developed countries and China are analysed from two perspectives: “individual” (research subjects, activity categories) and “environment” (research areas, environmental factors) (as shown in Table 8). Regarding research subjects, studies in developed countries have a broader focus on the main population groups. In addition to the elderly [], children [], adolescents [], and women [], attention is also paid to special groups such as low-income groups and minorities [,]. Research in China primarily focuses more on the elderly [], followed by children [], and women have become the focus in recent studies [], but there is less attention paid to adolescents, especially college students. However, statistics from the National Health Commission of China show that the prevalence of chronic diseases is becoming increasingly common among younger populations, with hypertension affecting 25% of residents aged 18 and above and abnormal blood lipids affecting 40% []. The health issues of adolescents are becoming increasingly prominent, requiring scholars to engage in targeted discussions about this population group. Regarding activity categories, research in developed countries categorizes physical activity in more detail. Currently, international physical activity studies are mainly categorized according to research purposes, with walking being one of the most common activities studied. It comprises the following four types of walking activities: work, transportation, leisure, household, and moderate-intensity physical activity []. In addition to walking, activities such as jogging [], other sports [], and cycling [] are also studied, second only to walking. In Chinese-language research, physical activity is not subdivided in detail. However, there is a greater focus on walking activities, with research primarily focusing on the walkability [], vitality [], and spatial quality [] of streets. Regarding research areas, developed countries typically divide study areas into urban areas [], suburbs [], and exurbs [], considering factors such as the level of development, population density, housing type, and income. On the other hand, research in China mainly focuses on the urban core area as the research area [], with few comparative studies combining different urban development regions. Regarding environmental factors, research in developed countries mainly focuses on the following four aspects: natural ecological environment (blue–green spaces, temperature, sunshine, etc.), the built environment (land use, sidewalk design, facility accessibility, etc.), the sociocultural environment (population density, crime density, etc.), and environmental psychological perception (sense of security, aesthetics, etc.). In contrast, Chinese-language research focuses more on the ecological environment, built environment, and environmental psychological perception elements, lacking investigation into sociocultural and environmental factors.
Table 8. Comparative analysis of research content between studies in developed countries and China.
Table 8. Comparative analysis of research content between studies in developed countries and China.
Research ComparisonDeveloped CountriesChina
IndividualResearch subjectsElderly, children, adolescents, women, low-income groups, and minoritiesThe elderly, children, and women
Activity categoriesWalking (for work, transportation, leisure, and household purposes), cycling, jogging, and other sportsWalking, cycling, and jogging
EnvironmentResearch areasAreas, suburbs, and exurbs, considering factors such as the level of development, population density, housing type, and incomeUrban core area
Environmental factorsThe natural ecological environment (blue–green spaces, temperature, sunshine, etc.), the built environment (land use, sidewalk design, facility accessibility, etc.), the sociocultural environment (population density, crime density, etc.), and environmental psychological perception (sense of security, aesthetics, etc.)The natural ecological environment, the built environment, and environmental psychological perception

4.3. Research Trends

Based on the multidimensional scaling chart of research from developed countries and China (Figure 12 and Figure 13), as well as the comparative analysis of research hotspots, development context, and theme categories, the following three considerations and suggestions are proposed for the future research trends of China and other developing countries undergoing urbanization transition: (1) Macro level: National governments should further introduce planning guidelines with strong practical applicability and encourage interdisciplinary collaboration among urban planning, landscape architecture, medicine, transportation engineering, psychology, sociology, and other fields to discuss existing policies and environmental conditions. In addition, the government should encourage researchers, practitioners, and various stakeholders to jointly explore the best research schemes and pathways for healthy streets, effectively realizing the interaction between theory and practice. (2) Mesoscopic level: Research should focus on integrating local characteristics and shifting towards “localization” while fully drawing on research results and practical experiences from developed countries. Urban types and regions should be classified based on population size, geographical location, cultural functions, etc., and targeted assessments of the healthy street environment, should be conducted identifying the pain points and difficulties in street environment construction, and promoting the comprehensive implementation of public policies. (3) Micro level: Scholars should further study the causal mechanism between street environment elements and physical activity. Future research should, at the “individual” level, differentiate population attributes (children, elderly, disabled, special groups, etc.) and expand types of physical activity (running, cycling, leisure activities, etc.). At the “environmental” level, environmental factors from different sensory perspectives (olfactory comfort, auditory comfort, safety perception, etc.) and environmental characteristics of different street types (residential, transportation-oriented, commercial, etc.) should be examined for their impact on physical activity. Additionally, social environment factors such as social norms and community cohesion should be investigated. Integrated use of small data (surveys, interviews, participatory observations, etc.) and big data (street view images, urban points of interest, remote sensing images, etc.) methods should be emphasized to improve survey accuracy and effectiveness, promote the integration of temporal and spatial data with individual behaviour, and mainly focus on the long-term tracking and evaluation of influencing factors, examining the relationship between changes in built environment and physical activity for the same population.

5. Conclusions

The study selects China as representative of developing countries to conduct comparative research with developed countries. It uses relevant literature from the CNKI and WOS databases on the impact of street environments on physical activity as analysis samples. The research tools Citespace, Bicomb, and SPSS are utilized for quantitative and comparative analysis of research hotspots, development contexts, thematic categories, and research trends. The results indicate that, from a research perspective, China exhibits a “top-down” characteristic dependent on policy guidance, whereas developed countries display a “bottom-up” characteristic driven by scientific issues. In the research phase, studies in China are mainly in the “pre-planning” stage, while those in developed countries are primarily in the “post-assessment” stage. Regarding theoretical foundation, the theoretical basis for the impact of environment on physical activity mainly comes from the “social-ecological theoretical model” in Western academic circles, while Chinese scholars often introduce Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, attention restoration theory, etc. Regarding disciplinary background, research in developed countries focuses on interdisciplinary cooperation, starting from disciplinary issues, while research in China, influenced by national strategic development, shows a phased transition dominated by different disciplines with relatively loose disciplinary cooperation. On the research scale, both developed countries and Chinese-language studies show a trend of shifting from a macro-scale to a human-centred scale. In terms of research methods, scholars actively apply multi-source and multi-scale big data. Compared to Chinese-language studies, international research examines research subjects, activity types, regions, and environmental impact factors more meticulously and comprehensively in thematic categories. Based on this, the study summarizes three development directions for future research on the impact of street environments on physical activity in China: (1) Macro level: the government can encourage academic exchanges and practical activities on health street environment creation issues between disciplines and stakeholders to enhance the implementation of street planning guidelines; (2) Meso level: research and practice should integrate local characteristics and conduct targeted evaluations for different city types and regions to implement public policies fully; (3) Micro level: refine the influencing factors at the “human” and “environment” levels, conduct long-term tracking and evaluation, and further sort out the causal mechanisms between street environments and physical activity.
The study aids scholars in comprehensively understanding the current state and developmental directions of research on the impact of street environments on physical activity. From a comparative research perspective, it contrasts the similarities and differences between China and developed countries. From the perspective of street environments, it offers pathways and insights for addressing health issues in developing countries with backgrounds similar to China’s. It also assists international scholars in accurately understanding the status of research on the impact of street environments on physical activity within the Chinese context, thereby promoting global health welfare and equity. However, it is important to note that this article analyses the hotspots, contexts, themes, and trends of research on the impact of street environments on physical activity in China and developed countries solely from the perspective of “keywords”, lacking a comprehensive review of the global research network from the perspectives of “research institutions”, “authors”, and “publications”. Future research should integrate methods such as institutional network analysis, author collaboration network analysis, and co-citation analysis to present the core knowledge framework of the field of healthy street environments to readers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and B.L.; methodology, Y.W. and B.L.; software, B.L.; validation, Y.W., B.L., Y.L. and L.Z.; formal analysis, B.L. and Y.L.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W. and B.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.W., B.L., Y.L. and L.Z.; visualization, B.L.; supervision, Y.W. and L.Z.; project administration, L.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hebei Provincial Department of Education Scientific Research Project Humanities and Social Sciences General Project entitled “Translation and Expression of Traditional Health Culture in Contemporary Health Landscape Design”, grant number SY2022003.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the reported results are included in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ghebreyesus, T.A. As WHO Turns 75, Let’s Prescribe Science, Solutions and Solidarity for Our Future Health. World Health Organization. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/zh/news-room/commentaries/detail/as-who-turns-75--let-s-prescribe-science--solutions-and-solidarity-for-our-future-health (accessed on 28 April 2024).
  2. Lewin, V.; Guerra, J.; Nelson, C.; Davis, A. Five Cities Recognized for Public Health Achievements at Partnership for Healthy Cities Summit. World Health Organization. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/zh/news/item/15-03-2023-five-cities-recognized-for-public-health-achievements-at-partnership-for-healthy-cities-summit (accessed on 28 April 2024).
  3. World Health Organization. Urban Health. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/zh/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/urban-health (accessed on 28 April 2024).
  4. United Nations. China’s Urban Population to Increase by 255 Million by 2050. 2024. Available online: https://www.un.org/zh/desa/2018-world-urbanization-prospects (accessed on 31 May 2024).
  5. Cyril, S.; Oldroyd, J.C.; Renzaho, A. Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: A systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rosenberg, P.; Kano, M.; Ludford, I.; Prasad, A.; Thomson, H. Global Report on Urban Health: Equitable, Healthier Cities for Sustainable Development; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Miranda, J.J.; Kinra, S.; Casas, J.P.; Davey Smith, G.; Ebrahim, S. Non-communicable diseases in low-and middle-income countries: Context, determinants and health policy. Chin. J. Health Policy 2013, 10, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/zh/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (accessed on 28 April 2024).
  9. Bush, C.L.; Pittman, S.; McKay, S.; Ortiz, T.; Wong, W.W.; Klish, W.J. Park-based obesity intervention program for inner-city minority children. J. Pediatr. 2007, 151, 513–517.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Seventh Plenary Meeting. WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030. Seventy-First World Health Assembly. 2018. Available online: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA71/A71_R6-ch.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2023).
  11. Zaglio, A. The Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century. Ann. Ig. Med. Prev. Comunita 1998, 10, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Yao, Y.; Liu, Y. The relationship between visual enclosure for neighbourhood street walkability and elders’ mental health in China: Using street view images. J. Transp. Health 2019, 13, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, R.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Yao, Y.; Grekousis, G. Perceptions of built environment and health outcomes for older Chinese in Beijing: A big data approach with street view images and deep learning technique. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2019, 78, 101386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Macioszek, E.; Granna, A.; Krawiec, S. Identification of factors increasing the risk of pedestrian death in road accidents involving a pedestrian with a motor vehicle. Arch. Transp. 2023, 65, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Macioszek, E.; Granna, A. The Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Severity of Bicyclist Injury in Bicyclist-Vehicle Crashes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, Y.; Jiang, Y.Q.; Li, L. Health Pathways of Urban Public Spaces: Connotations, Elements, and Framework of Health Streets. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2021, 39, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  17. National Bureau of Statistics, Urban Division. Significant Improvement in Urbanization Level, Urban Appearance Rejuvenated—Achievements in Economic and Social Development over 40 Years of Reform and Opening Up Series Report 11. National Bureau of Statistics. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/zt_18555/ztfx/ggkf40n/202302/t20230209_1902591.html (accessed on 28 April 2024).
  18. Guan, X.; Wei, H.; Lu, S.; Dai, Q.; Su, H. Assessment on the urbanization strategy in China: Achievements, challenges and reflections. Habitat Int. 2018, 71, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, G.P.; Sun, Y. Analysis of Regional Economic Review: Toward Urbanization in China by 2030 and Its Regional Disparities. Reg. Econ. Rev. 2020, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, B.; Guo, S.; Zheng, X. Transitions in Chronic Disease Mortality in China: Evidence and Implications. China CDC Wkly. 2023, 5, 1131–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Song, B.; Ren, Y.Y.; Li, W.; Feng, M. Knowledge Graph Analysis of Interdisciplinary Research on Urban Planning and Public Health in English Literature. J. Xi’an Univ. Archit. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2021, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.Y. Urban Public Health Risks from the Perspective of Urban Metabolism. World Geogr. Res. 2021, 40, 319–330. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, G.; Zhang, L. The Role and Strategy of Sports Industry in Promoting the Construction of Healthy China. Sports Cult. Guide 2020, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. State Council. The State Council Issues the National Fitness Plan (2021–2025). General Administration of Sport of China. Available online: https://www.sport.gov.cn/gdnps/files/c25531540/25531552.pdf (accessed on 3 December 2023).
  25. Jefferis, B.J.; Sartini, C.; Lee, I.M.; Choi, M.; Amuzu, A.; Gutierrez, C.; Casas, J.P.; Ash, S.; Lennon, L.T.; Wannamethee, S.G.; et al. Adherence to physical activity guidelines in older adults, using objectively measured physical activity in a population-based study. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tainio, M.; Jovanovic Andersen, Z.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; Hu, L.; de Nazelle, A.; An, R.; Garcia, L.M.T.; Goenka, S.; Zapata-Diomedi, B.; Bull, F.; et al. Air pollution, physical activity and health: A mapping review of the evidence. Environ. Int. 2021, 147, 105954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yin, L.; Wang, Z. Measuring visual enclosure for street walkability: Using machine learning algorithms and Google Street View imagery. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 76, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blodgett, J.M.; Ahmadi, M.N.; Atkin, A.J.; Chastin, S.; Chan, H.W.; Suorsa, K.; Bakker, E.A.; Hettiarcachchi, P.; Johansson, P.J.; Sherar, L.B.; et al. Device-measured physical activity and cardiometabolic health: The Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep (ProPASS) consortium. Eur. Heart J. 2024, 45, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xia, G.O.A. Analyzing spatial relationships between urban land use intensity and urban vitality at street block level: A case study of five Chinese megacities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 193, 103669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Klein, S.; Brondeel, R.; Chaix, B.; Klein, O.; Thierry, B.; Kestens, Y.; Gerber, P.; Perchoux, C. What triggers selective daily mobility among older adults? A study comparing trip and environmental characteristics between observed path and shortest path. Health Place 2023, 79, 102730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Barnett, D.W.; Barnett, A.; Nathan, A.; Van Cauwenberg, J.; Cerin, E.; Council on Environment and Physical Activity (CEPA)—Older Adults working group. Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Koene, M.; Chen, C.; Wagenaar, C.; Reijneveld, S.A. Associations between the built environment and physical activity in children, adults and older people: A narrative review of reviews. Prev. Med. 2024, 180, 107856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Prince, S.A.; Lancione, S.; Lang, J.J.; Amankwah, N.; de Groh, M.; Jaramillo Garcia, A.; Merucci, K.; Geneau, R. Examining the state, quality and strength of the evidence in the research on built environments and physical activity among adults: An overview of reviews from high income countries. Health Place 2022, 77, 102874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, R.; Shu, P. A Review of Urban Green Spaces Based on Recreational Physical Activity. Landsc. Archit. 2020, 28, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, Y. Comparative Study of Furniture Design in China and Abroad from the Perspective of Bibliometrics and Knowledge Graph. Packag. Eng. 2023, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cui, Y.Q.; Lin, X.Y. Quantitative Analysis and Evaluation of Research on National Education Policies in China. J. Southwest Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2020, 89–97, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, J.; Chen, C.M. CiteSpace: Text Mining and Visualization in Scientific Literature; Capital University of Economics and Business Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  38. Qiu, J.P.; Yang, S.L.; Song, Y.H. Visual Analysis of the Current Research Status of Knowledge Exchange. J. Libr. Sci. China 2012, 38, 78–89. [Google Scholar]
  39. Duan, J.; Yang, B.J.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, J.X.; Ye, B.; Luo, H.M.; Yang, Y.Z. Planning to Enhance Urban Immunity: A Symposium on Responding to the Outbreak of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia. Urban Plan. 2020, 44, 115–136. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yan, D.R. Constructing a Resilient Community Emergency Governance System. Adm. Forum 2020, 38, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen, Y. Principles and Applications of Citation Spatial Analysis: A Practical Guide to CiteSpace; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhou, F.; Luo, L.Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhang, J.; Dang, Q.Q.; Dong, C.M. Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Sepsis and Microbiota Therapy. Microbiol. Bull. 2024, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, Q.; Wei, X.; Ren, G.N. Street design guidelines and the optimization and improvement of urban road system: The transformation from traffic capacity to space quality. Urban Transp. China 2021, 19, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen, X.; Liu, Y.H.; Ding, Z.H. Research on Governance Pathways of Street Public Spaces Based on Action Planning: A Case Study of the Street Space Governance Process in New York City from 2007 to 2020. Int. Urban Plan. 2021, 32, 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  45. Amos, D. Prytherch: Law, Engineering, and the American Right-of-Way: Imagining a More Just Street. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2020, 86, 384–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Brownson, R.C.; Hoehner, C.M.; Day, K.; Forsyth, A.; Sallis, J.F. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: State of the science. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 36, S99–S123.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ewing, R.; Cervero, R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2010, 76, 265–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cerin, E.; Saelens, B.E.; Sallis, J.F.; Frank, L.D. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: Validity and development of a short form. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2006, 38, 1682–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Edwards, N.; Hooper, P.; Trapp, G.S.; Bull, F.C.; Boruff, B.J.; Giles-Corti, B. Development of a public open space desktop auditing tool (POSDAT): A remote sensing approach. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 38, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Caimotto, M.C. London Mayor’s Transport Strategy. In Discourses of Cycling, Road Users and Sustainability. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  51. Global Designing Cities Initiative; National Association of City Transportation Officials. Global Street Design Guide; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yin, L. Street level urban design qualities for walkability: Combining 2D and 3D GIS measures. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2017, 64, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Larkin, A.; Gu, X.; Chen, L.; Hystad, P. Predicting Perceptions of the Built Environment using GIS, Satellite and Street View Image Approaches. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2021, 216, 104257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Owen, N.; Sugiyama, T.; Eakin, E.E.; Gardiner, P.A.; Tremblay, M.S.; Sallis, J.F. Adults’ sedentary behavior: Determinants and interventions. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 41, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sallis, J.F.; Owen, N.; Fisher, E.B. Ecological models of health behavior. In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4th ed.; Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Viswanath, K., Eds.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 465–485. [Google Scholar]
  56. Giles-Corti, W. The Relative Influence of, and Interaction between, Environmental and Individual Determinants of Recreational Physical Activity in Sedentary Workers and Homemakers. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  57. Pikora, T. Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc. Sci. Med. 2003, 56, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zimring, C.; Joseph, A.; Nicholl, G.L. Influences of building design and site design on physical activity: Research and intervention opportunities. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Duncan, M.; Mummery, K. Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with physical activity among city dwellers in regional Queensland. Prev. Med. 2005, 40, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cain, K.L.; Millstein, R.A.; Sallis, J.F.; Conway, T.L.; Gavand, K.A.; Frank, L.D.; Saelens, B.E.; Geremia, C.M.; Chapman, J.; Adams, M.A.; et al. Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). Soc. Sci. Med. 2014, 116, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ewing, R.; Cervero, R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1780, 87–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Frank, L.D.; Schmid, T.L.; Sallis, J.F.; Chapman, J.; Saelens, B.E. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28 (Suppl. S2), 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ewing, R.; Hajrasouliha, A.; Neckerman, K.M.; Purciel-Hill, M.; Greene, W. Streetscape Features Related to Pedestrian Activity. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2016, 36, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lu, Y.; Sarkar, C.; Xiao, Y. The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: Evidence from Hong Kong. Soc. Sci. Med. 2018, 208, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Giles-Corti, B.; Wood, G.; Pikora, T.; Learnihan, V.; Bulsara, M.; Van Niel, K.; Timperio, A.; McCormack, G.; Villanueva, K. School site and the potential to walk to school: The impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods. Health Place 2011, 17, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Finlay, J.; Franke, T.; McKay, H.; Sims-Gould, J. Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults. Health Place 2015, 34, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sallis, J.F.; Kerr, J.; Carlson, J.A.; Norman, G.J.; Saelens, B.E.; Durant, N.; Ainsworth, B.E. Evaluating a Brief Self-Report Measure of Neighborhood Environments for Physical Activity Research and Surveillance: Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale (PANES). J. Phys. Act. Health 2010, 7, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Duncan, D.T.; Aldstadt, J.; Whalen, J.; Melly, S.J.; Gortmaker, S.L. Validation of Walk Score® for Estimating Neighborhood Walkability: An Analysis of Four US Metropolitan Areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 4160–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Alfonzo, M.A. To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environ. Behav. 2005, 37, 808–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hang, T.; Solmon, M. Integrating self-determination theory with the social ecological model to understand students’ physical activity behaviors. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2013, 6, 54–76. [Google Scholar]
  71. Marselle, M.R.; Irvine, K.N.; Lorenzo-Arribas, A.; Warber, S.L. Moving beyond Green: Exploring the Relationship of Environment Type and Indicators of Perceived Environmental Quality on Emotional Well-Being following Group Walks. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 106–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Schölmerich, V.L.N.; Kawachi, I. Translating the socio-ecological perspective into multilevel interventions: Gaps between theory and practice. Health Educ. Behav. 2016, 43, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tang, Z.; Wei, C. Comparative study of street furniture at home and abroad based on analysis of scientific knowledge graphs. Packag. Eng. 2022, 2022, 276–285, 289. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ma, W.; Xu, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, H.; Nie, S.; Chen, Z.; Deng, H.; Li, H. Epidemiological characteristics analysis of overweight and obesity among adults in Guangdong Province in 2002. Chin. J. Epidemiol. 2004, 12, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  75. Pan, X.; Li, G.; Hu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, W.; An, Z.; Liu, J.; Cao, H.; Hu, Z.; Pang, C.; et al. Influence of dietary and exercise interventions on the incidence of diabetes: A prospective observation of 530 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Chin. J. Intern. Med. 1995, 2, 108–112. [Google Scholar]
  76. Pan, X.R.; Li, G.W.; Hu, Y.H.; Wang, J.-X.; Yang, W.-Y.; An, Z.-X.; Hu, Z.-X.; Lin, J.; Xiao, J.-Z.; Cao, H.-B.; et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance: The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 1997, 20, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yu, Y.F. Health city planning: From development concepts to planning practices. Urban Plan. Forum 2022, 2022, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  78. Beijing Municipal Institute of City Planning and Design. Design Guidelines for Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Traffic Systems in Beijing Urban Areas; China Plan Press: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  79. Xinhua News Agency. Development and Reform Commission Initiates Pilot Projects for National Low-Carbon Provinces and Cities. Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. 18 August 2010. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-08/18/content_1683261.htm (accessed on 28 April 2024).
  80. Guo, X.M.; Wang, D.X. Interpretation of Canadian environmental construction from the perspective of healthy cities. Int. Urban Plan. 2013, 28, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhu, R.R.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, A.; Gao, W.J. Literature review and analysis of research frontiers in the field of health in landscape architecture. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2021, 37, 26–31. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wu, W.Z.; Lu, J.S.; Zhao, B. Comparative study of street design guidelines at home and abroad. Planner 2022, 38, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
  83. Tang, J.X.; Long, Y.; Zhai, W.; Ma, Y. Measuring quality of street space, its temporal variation and impact factors:an analysis based on massive street view pictures. New Archit. 2016, 5, 110–115. [Google Scholar]
  84. Xu, L.Q.; Meng, R.X.; Huang, S.Q.; Chen, Z. Healing-oriented street design: Exploration based on VR experiments. Urban Plan. Int. 2019, 34, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ge, Y.; Shen, X.; Cai, C.T. Theory, method and practice of healthy street design. Shanghai Urban Plan. 2020, 2, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ren, W.; Huang, J. Mapping the structure of interpreting studies in China (1996–2019) through co-word analysis. Perspectives 2022, 30, 224–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lu, W.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Bu, Y.; Li, X.; Cheng, Q. How do authors select keywords? A preliminary study of author keyword selection behavior. J. Informetr. 2020, 14, 101066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Lv, T. A Bibliometric Analysis on Land Degradation: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions. Land 2020, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, M.; He, Y.; Meng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Mango, J.; Li, X. Assessing street space quality using street view imagery and function-driven method: The case of Xiamen, China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, R.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Yao, Y. The linkage between the perception of neighborhood and physical activity in Guangzhou, China: Using street view imagery with deep learning techniques. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2019, 18, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Sarkar, C.; Webster, C.; Pryor, M.; Tang, D.; Melbourne, S.; Zhang, X.; Jianzheng, L. Exploring associations between urban green, street design and walking: Results from the Greater London boroughs. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 143, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Leung, K.Y.K.; Loo, B.P.Y. Determinants of children’s active travel to school: A case study in Hong Kong. Travel Behav. Soc. 2020, 21, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oliver, M.; McPhee, J.; Carroll, P.; Ikeda, E.; Mavoa, S.; Mackay, L.; Kearns, R.A.; Kyttä, M.; Asiasiga, L.; Garrett, N.; et al. Neighbourhoods for Active Kids: Study protocol for a cross-sectional examination of neighbourhood features and children’s physical activity, active travel, independent mobility and body size. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e013377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Turrisi, T.B.; Bittel, K.M.; West, A.B.; Hojjatinia, S.; Hojjatinia, S.; Mama, S.K.; Lagoa, C.M.; Conroy, D.E. Seasons, weather, and device-measured movement behaviors: A scoping review from 2006 to 2020. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2021, 18, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Carrasco-Hernandez, R.; Smedley, A.R.D.; Webb, A.R. Using urban canyon geometries obtained from Google Street View for atmospheric studies: Potential applications in the calculation of street level total shortwave irradiances. Energy Build. 2015, 86, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wu, D.; Gong, J.; Liang, J.; Sun, J.; Zhang, G. Analyzing the influence of urban street greening and street buildings on summertime air pollution based on street view image data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bracy, N.L.; Millstein, R.A.; Carlson, J.A.; Conway, T.L.; Sallis, J.F.; Saelens, B.E.; Kerr, J.; Cain, K.L.; Frank, L.D.; King, A.C. Is the relationship between the built environment and physical activity moderated by perceptions of crime and safety? Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Campbell, A.; Both, A.; Sun, Q.C. Detecting and mapping traffic signs from Google Street View images using deep learning and GIS. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2019, 77, 101350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ren, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhou, B.; Feng, Z. YOLOv5s-m: A deep learning network model for road pavement damage detection from urban street-view imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023, 120, 103335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rita, L.; Peliteiro, M.; Bostan, T.-C.; Tamagusko, T.; Ferreira, A. Using deep learning and Google Street View imagery to assess and improve cyclist safety in London. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Harvey, C.; Aultman-Hall, L.; Hurley, S.E.; Troy, A. Effects of skeletal streetscape design on perceived safety. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 142, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cain, K.L.; Gavand, K.A.; Conway, T.L.; Geremia, C.M.; Millstein, R.A.; Frank, L.D.; Sallis, J.F. Developing and validating an abbreviated version of the Microscale Audit for Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS-Abbreviated). Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2017, 5, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kurka, J.M.; Adams, M.A.; Geremia, C.; Zhu, W.; Cain, K.L.; Conway, T.L.; Sallis, J.F. Comparison of field and online observations for measuring land uses using the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). J. Transp. Health 2016, 3, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Steinmetz-Wood, M.; Velauthapillai, K.; O’Brien, G.; Ross, N.A. Assessing the micro-scale environment using Google Street View: The Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS). BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Mooney, S.J.; Wheeler-Martin, K.; Fiedler, L.M.; LaBelle, C.M.; Lampe, T.; Ratanatharathorn, A.; DiMaggio, C.J. Development and validation of a Google Street View pedestrian safety audit tool. Epidemiology 2020, 31, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Vanwolleghem, G.; Ghekiere, A.; Cardon, G.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I.; D’haese, S.; Geremia, C.M.; Lenoir, M.; Sallis, J.F.; Verhoeven, H.; Van Dyck, D. Using an audit tool (MAPS Global) to assess the characteristics of the physical environment related to walking for transport in youth: Reliability of Belgian data. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2016, 15, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rosenberg, D.; Ding, D.; Sallis, J.F.; Kerr, J.; Norman, G.J.; Durant, N.; Harris, S.K.; Saelens, B.E. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale for Youth (NEWS-Y): Reliability and relationship with physical activity. Prev. Med. 2009, 49, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bors, P.; Dessauer, M.; Bell, R.; Wilkerson, R.; Lee, J.; Strunk, S.L. The Active Living by Design National Program: Community initiatives and lessons learned. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 37 (Suppl. S2), S313–S321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sayers, S.P.; LeMaster, J.W.; Thomas, I.M.; Petroski, G.F.; Ge, B. Bike, walk, and wheel: A way of life in Columbia, Missouri, revisited. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2012, 43 (Suppl. S4), S379–S383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Deehr, R.C.; Shumann, A. Active Seattle: Achieving walkability in diverse neighborhoods. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 37 (Suppl. S2), S403–S411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gomez-Feliciano, L.; McCreary, L.L.; Sadowsky, R.; Peterson, S.; Hernandez, A.; McElmurry, B.J.; Park, C.G. Active Living Logan Square: Joining together to create opportunities for physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 37 (Suppl. S2), S361–S367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. McCreedy, M.; Leslie, J.G. Get Active Orlando: Changing the built environment to increase physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 37 (Suppl. S2), S395–S402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Salleses, P.; Schechtner, K.; Hidalgo, C.A. The collaborative image of the city: Mapping the inequality of urban perception. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Naik, N.; Philipoom, J.; Raskar, R.; Hidalgo, C.A. Streetscore–Predicting the Perceived Safety of One Million Streetscapes. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Columbus, OH, USA, 23–28 June 2014; pp. 793–799. [Google Scholar]
  115. Aspinall, P.; Mavros, P.; Coyne, R.; Roe, J. The urban brain: Analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG. Br. J. Sports Med. 2015, 49, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bratman, G.N.; Hamilton, J.P.; Hahn, K.S.; Daily, G.C.; Gross, J.J. Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8567–8572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kaplan, R. Some psychological benefits of an outdoor challenge programme. Environ. Behav. 1974, 6, 101–116. [Google Scholar]
  118. Ulrich, R.S. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environments. In Behavior and the Natural Environments; Altman, I., Wohlwill, J.F., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  119. Wilson, E.O. Biophilia; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  120. Koordzij, J.M.; Beenackers, M.A.; Oude Groeniger, J.; Van Lenthe, F.J. Effect of changes in green spaces on mental health in older adults: A fixed effects analysis. Epidemiol. Community Health 2020, 74, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Beyer, K.M.M.; Kaltenbach, A.; Szabo, A.; Bogar, S.; Nieto, F.J.; Malecki, K.M. Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: Evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 3453–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chen, X.; Wang, B.; Zhang, B. Far from the madding crowd: The positive effects of nature, theories and applications. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 2016, 24, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Helbich, M.; Yao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Wang, R. Using deep learning to examine street view green and blue spaces and their associations with geriatric depression in Beijing, China. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Wang, R.; Helbich, M.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Y. Urban greenery and mental wellbeing in adults: Cross-sectional mediation analyses on multiple pathways across different greenery measures. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wang, R.; Feng, Z.; Pearce, J.; Liu, Y.; Dong, G. Are greenspace quantity and quality associated with mental health through different mechanisms in Guangzhou, China: A comparison study using street view data. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 117976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Fan, P.Y.; Chun, K.P.; Mijic, A.; Tan, M.L.; Liu, M.S.; Yetemen, O. A framework to evaluate the accessibility, visibility, and intelligibility of green-blue spaces (GBSs) related to pedestrian movement. Urban For. Urban Green 2022, 69, 127494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mohamed, A.A.; Kronenberg, J.; Łaszkiewicz, E. Transport infrastructure modifications and accessibility to public parks in Greater Cairo. Urban For. Urban Green 2022, 73, 127599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sarkar, C.; Gallacher, J.; Webster, C. Built environment configuration and change in body mass index: The Caerphilly Prospective Study (CaPS). Health Place 2013, 19, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Ozbil, A.; Gurleyen, T.; Yesiltepe, D.; Zunbuloglu, E. Comparative Associations of Street Network Design, Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Xue, B.; Pang, Z.; Bao, G.; Gao, W.; Nan, H.; Wang, S.; Ren, J.; Zhang, L.; Qiao, Q. Analysis of overweight and obesity status and influencing factors among residents in Qingdao City. Chin. J. Public Health 2008, 5, 585–586. [Google Scholar]
  131. Deng, Y.; Gao, Y.L.; Wu, X.P.; He, J.; Ji, K.; Zhang, N.M.; Yuan, J.G. Epidemiological analysis of overweight and obesity among urban and rural adults in Sichuan Province. Mod. Prev. Med. 2007, 18, 3487–3489. [Google Scholar]
  132. Feng, S.; Yang, Y.; Xia, N. Associations between healthy lifestyles and depressive symptoms among adults in China: A longitudinal study. Lancet 2018, 392, S59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wu, M.Q.; Xiao, J.; Li, F.F.; Hu, R.R.; Liu, C.X. 24-hour activity behavior: A new direction in studying factors influencing the health of elderly people. Chin. Gen. Pract. 2024, 27, 1911–1916. [Google Scholar]
  134. Shen, T.; Wang, Y.; Jin, W.; Lin, Z.H.; Yan, L. Analysis of risk factors for cognitive decline in elderly patients with chronic diseases and construction of a risk model. J. Jilin Univ. (Med. Ed.) 2023, 49, 1304–1309. [Google Scholar]
  135. Pan, F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Gan, Y.D.; Gong, L.T.; Zhang, L.C.; Chang, C. Study on the current status and influencing factors of depression and anxiety symptoms among patients with different chronic diseases in Daxing District, Beijing. Chin. Health Educ. 2023, 39, 948–954. [Google Scholar]
  136. Chen, S.S.; Yang, G.; Liu, L. Reflections on the study of outdoor activity space allocation for urban children in China. J. Southw. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 44, 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  137. Xiao, X.N.; Han, X.L. Characteristics of outdoor physical activity spaces for children in urban villages and environmental influencing factors: A case study of Pingshan Village, Shenzhen City. Mod. Urban Res. 2019, 34, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  138. Huang, L.; Yin, X.M. Study on the correlation between children’s activity behavior and space in mountainous urban communities: A case study of Shangdatianwan Community in Yuzhong District, Chongqing. Urban Plan. 2022, 46, 87–98, 120. [Google Scholar]
  139. Leng, H.; Gao, Z.Q.; Yuan, Q. Characteristics of outdoor activities in different seasons in cold urban areas for children and implications for spatial planning. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2020, 9, 53–58. [Google Scholar]
  140. Liu, X.H.; Yu, Y.F. Influence of community built environment on the health of the elderly under conditions of high-density living environment and intervention paths. Urban Dev. Res. 2023, 8, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  141. Wang, X.T.; Han, X.L. Influence of environmental factors diversity on children’s physical activity in activity venues. J. West. Hum. Settl. 2018, 6, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  142. He, X.L.; Zhuang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, P.J. Built environment factors affecting high-intensity physical activity among children and adolescents: A study based on GIS objective measurement. Sports Sci. 2017, 38, 101–110+51. [Google Scholar]
  143. Quan, M.H.; He, X.L.; Su, Y.Y.; Chen, P.J.; Zhuang, J. Tracking study on spatial characteristics of physical activity of children and adolescents based on GPS and accelerometer. Sports Sci. 2017, 1, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
  144. Yang, Y.; He, D.; Gou, Z.; Wang, R.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y. Association between street greenery and walking behavior in older adults in Hong Kong. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 51, 101747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zang, P.; Lu, Y.; Ma, J.; Xie, B.; Wang, R.; Liu, Y. Disentangling residential self-selection from impacts of built environment characteristics on travel behaviors for older adults. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 238, 112515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Yu, Y.; Lu, X. Behavioral variables and their mediating effects in the study of the health impact of built environment: A case study of the health behavior of the elderly in Shanghai community. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2021, 39, 8. [Google Scholar]
  147. Wu, Z.J.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zhang, F.; Song, Y.L.Q.; Wang, H.L.; Gao, L. The impact of urban built environment on the health of the elderly: Model verification mediated by physical activity. China Sport Sci. Technol. 2019, 55, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  148. Yang, L.; Ao, Y.; Ke, J.; Lu, Y.; Liang, Y. To walk or not to walk? Examining non-linear effects of streetscape greenery on walking propensity of older adults. J. Transp. Geogr. 2021, 94, 103099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Feng, J.; Huang, X.; Tang, S. Study on the influence mechanism of objective and subjective built environment on different physical activities of the elderly: A case study of Nanjing. Shanghai Urban Plan. Rev. 2017, 3, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  150. Shen, Q.; Zeng, W.; Ye, Y.; Arisona, S.M.; Schubiger, S.; Burkhard, R.; Qu, H. StreetVizor: Visual exploration of human-scale urban forms based on street views. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018, 24, 1004–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zhu, C.; Zheng, S.; Zhen, R.; Rong, Q. Research on the optimization of healthy street environment based on motion trajectory data: A case study of the core area of Beijing. Planner 2023, 39, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
  152. Cui, Z.; He, L.; Wu, L.; Zhang, X. Voting with feet: Performance evaluation and diagnosis of running spaces in Beijing based on individual trajectories. Planner 2023, 39, 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  153. Wu, J.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, Z. Research on the development of “Internet+” sports health products. Packag. Eng. 2017, 38, 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  154. Huang, H.; Gan, X.; Chen, Y. Optimization research on slow travel system in Lugu Lake scenic area based on big data of sports trajectory. Planner 2020, 22, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  155. Kong, L. Review and reflection on the development of urban transportation in the past 20 years: Witness of the 20th anniversary of the founding of Urban Transportation. Urban Transp. 2023, 21, 16–25. [Google Scholar]
  156. Wang, Y. Influence of health-supportive environment on regular physical activity of urban and rural residents: From the perspective of social ecology. Mod. Urban Res. 2021, 10, 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  157. Song, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Z. Fuzzy evaluation of urban community built environment for leisure physical activity of elderly people. J. Xi’an Inst. Phys. Educ. 2018, 35, 309–317. [Google Scholar]
  158. Ding, Y.; Xue, H. Retrospective analysis of hot topics in educational management research in China: Based on bibliometric and co-word analysis of “Modern Educational Management” (2009–2016). Mod. Educ. Manag. 2017, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  159. Li, H.Y.; Cui, L.; Cui, M. Hot topics in Chinese herbal drugs research documented in PubMed/MEDLINE by authors inside China and outside of China in the past 10 years: Based on co-word cluster analysis. Altern. Complement. Med. 2009, 15, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Zhao, F.; Shi, B.; Liu, R.; Zhou, W.; Shi, D.; Zhang, J. Theme trends and knowledge structure on choroidal neovascularization: A quantitative and co-word analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018, 18, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Huang, Q.; Jin, H. Research progress and implications of the impact mechanism of green spaces on physical activity based on the social-ecological model. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2023, 39, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  162. Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Dai, D. A review of research on physical activity of urban residents abroad based on the social-ecological model. Mod. Urban Res. 2020, 4, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  163. Wang, X.; Jiao, J. A review of research on built environment based on commuting trips. Int. Urban Plan. 2018, 33, 57–62, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Huang, Z.; Li, Z.; Lang, W. Measurement of street space quality and its impact on street vitality based on multi-source big data: A case study of historical urban areas in Guangzhou. Shanghai Urban Plan. 2023, 6, 122–130. [Google Scholar]
  165. Zhang, J.; Yu, Z.; Zhao, B. The pathways through which urban green spaces promote public health: Theoretical framework and practical implications. Landsc. Archit. 2020, 8, 104–113. [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhao, M.; Zhen, F.; Jiang, Y. Comprehensive evaluation and optimization strategies of urban community walking environment: A case study of the main urban area of Nanjing. Mod. Urban Res. 2021, 2, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
  167. Wu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Qian, C. Landscape architecture and public health: Consensus, boundaries, and integration—An examination of disciplinary relationships under the perspective of two public health revolutions. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2021, 37, 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  168. Wang, Z. Research Methods in Landscape Design; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  169. Wu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, F.; Hu, F. The influence of subjective and objective built environments on outdoor physical activity among older adults. J. Cap. Inst. Phys. Educ. 2023, 35, 317–325. [Google Scholar]
  170. Liang, H. Research on the relationship between urban morphology and physical activity. J. Chengdu Sport Univ. 2016, 42, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  171. Ma, P.; Li, W.; Fang, W. Urbanization, agglomeration effect, and the development of the tertiary industry. J. Financ. Econ. 2010, 8, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  172. Ye, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, W. Measurement of street space quality at the human scale: A large-scale, high-precision evaluation framework combining street view data and new analysis techniques. Int. Urban Plan. 2019, 34, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Rahman, T.; Cushing, R.A.; Jackson, R.J. Contributions of Built Environment to Childhood Obesity. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 2011, 78, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Dzhambov, A.; Hartig, T.; Markevych, I.; Tilov, B.; Dimitrova, D. Urban Residential Greenspace and Mental Health in Youth: Different Approaches to Testing Multiple Pathways Yield Different Conclusions. Environ. Res. 2018, 160, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Shaoming, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Linting, W. Impacts of Urban Environment on Women’s Emotional Health and Planning Improving Strategies: An Empirical Study of Guangzhou Based on Neuroscience Experiments. China City Plan. Rev. 2023, 32, 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  176. Wolch, J.R.; Byrne, J.; Newell, J.P. Urban Green Space, Public Health, and Environmental Justice: The Challenge of Making Cities ‘Just Green Enough’. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 125, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. James, P.; Hart, J.E.; Banay, R.F.; Laden, F.; Signorello, L.B. Built Environment and Depression in Low-Income African Americans and Whites. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 52, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Chen, C.; Haili, T.; Yong, C. Study on Built Environment Influencing Factors and Planning Response of Obesity in Elderly Women. Hum. Geogr. 2018, 33, 76–81. [Google Scholar]
  179. Pan, H.; Zuo, Q.; Yang, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, L. The proactive health model integrating physical education, health, and hygiene is an important means of preventing and controlling chronic diseases in adolescents. Chin. J. Med. 2024, 15, 211–216. [Google Scholar]
  180. Sugiyama, T.; Neuhaus, M.; Cole, R.; Giles-Corti, B.; Owen, N. Destination and route attributes associated with adults’ walking: A review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012, 44, 1275–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Lin, D.; Jiang, H.; Li, W.; Qiu, B.; Wang, H.; Qiu, W. Assessing impacts of objective features and subjective perceptions of street environment on running amount: A case study of Boston. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2023, 235, 104756. [Google Scholar]
  182. Randers, M.B.; Petersen, J.; Andersen, L.J.; Krustrup, B.R.; Hornstrup, T.; Nielsen, J.J.; Nordentoft, M.; Krustrup, P. Short-term street soccer improves fitness and cardiovascular health status of homeless men. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 112, 2097–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kellstedt, D.K.; Spengler, J.O.; Foster, M.; Lee, C.; Maddock, J.E. A scoping review of bikeability assessment methods. J. Community Health 2021, 46, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Long, Y.; Li, L.; Li, S.; Chen, L.; Pan, Z.; Yao, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, Y.; Quan, J.; Zhang, L.; et al. Measurement of street walking environment index in China’s urban vitality centers. South. Archit. 2021, 1, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Hao, X.; Long, Y.; Shi, M.; Wang, P. Street vitality in Beijing: Measurement, influencing factors, and planning design implications. Shanghai Urban Plan. 2016, 3, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  186. Sallis, J.F.; Cerin, E.; Conway, T.L.; Adams, M.A.; Frank, L.D.; Pratt, M.; Salvo, D.; Schipperijn, J.; Smith, G.; Cain, K.L.; et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. Lancet 2016, 387, 2207–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Janeczko, E.; Bielinis, E.; Wójcik, R.; Woźnicka, M.; Kędziora, W.; Łukowski, A.; Elsadek, M.; Szyc, K.; Janeczko, K. When urban environment is restorative: The effect of walking in suburbs and forests on psychological and physiological relaxation of young Polish adults. Forests 2020, 11, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Mygind, L.; Bentsen, P.; Badland, H.; Edwards, N.; Hooper, P.; Villanueva, K. Public open space desktop auditing tool—Establishing appropriateness for use in Australian regional and urban settings. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016, 20, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.