Natural Vibration Characteristics Analysis of a High-Rise Reinforced Masonry Structure Based on Field Test Data
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Information about the Reinforced Masonry Structure
3. Structural Dynamic Characteristics Identification Method
3.1. Environmental Excitation Method
3.2. Data Processing Method
3.3. Peak-Picking Method
4. Environmental Vibration Test Data Analysis
4.1. Environmental Vibration Data Preprocessing
4.2. Results Analysis
4.3. Numerical Modal Analysis
5. Structural Vibration Analysis during Songyuan Earthquake
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- With the increase of floors, the Fourier amplitude spectra of the structural environmental vibration data contained more spectral information, and the frequencies at the peak points for each segment of data were also more consistent, which could better calculate the natural vibration frequency of the structure. Specifically, the first three-order frequencies in the NS direction were 0.554, 2.461, and 5.487 Hz, respectively, and the first three-order frequencies in the EW direction were 0.877, 3.051, and 5.765 Hz, respectively. Then, the mode shapes of the structure at the corresponding natural frequencies were determined using the ratio of the amplitudes of the different measuring points. Furthermore, comparing the numerical modal analysis results with the test results revealed the accuracy of the obtained structural dynamic characteristics.
- (2)
- Based on the structural response records during an earthquake in Songyuan, the first three-order natural frequencies of the structure in the NS and EW directions were identified, which were 0.555 Hz, 2.319 Hz, and 5.322 Hz, and 0.876, 3.067, and 5.392 Hz, respectively, and basically the same as the results obtained from the environmental vibration data. The structural response data before, during, and after the earthquake were then analyzed. It can be seen that the natural frequency of the structure changed very little, and the maximum relative error was only 8.7%. Considering the small amplitude of the seismic response records, it could be determined that the structure remained in an elastic state after the earthquake.
- (3)
- Based on the comprehensive analysis results, during modal parameter identification of high-rise and regular-plan structures, and under the premise of cost and time limits, it is suggested that a structural response array is set up on the floors above one-third of the height of the structure, besides the first floor and the free field, from which better identification results and the ideal mode shapes can be obtained.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, H.X. The Great Tangshan Earthquake Damage (Vol. 1); Earthquake Press: Beijing, China, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y. Strong Motion Observation Technology; Earthquake Press: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, B.; Fan, Y.; Wen, R.; Gong, M.; Xie, L. Development status and prospect for building structures seismic response observation array. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Dyn. 2017, 37, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
- Ricles, J.M.; Kosmatka, J.B. Damage detection in elastic structures using vibratory residual forces and weighted sensitivity. AIAA J. 1992, 30, 2310–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartilson, D.T.; Jang, J.; Smyth, A.W. Sensitivity-based singular value decomposition parametrization and optimal regularization in finite element model updating. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2020, 27, e2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.L.; Ventura, C.E.; Xiong, H.; Lu, W.; Pan, Y.; Cao, J. Evaluation of the dynamic characteristics of a super tall building using data from ambient vibration and shake table tests by a Bayesian approach. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2018, 25, e2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventura, C.E.; Ding, Y. Strong Motion Instrumentation of Buildings. In Strong Motion Instrumentation for Civil Engineering Structures; Erdik, M., Celebi, M., Mihailov, V., Apaydin, N., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 313–330. [Google Scholar]
- NIED. Strong-Motion Seismograph Networks (K-NET, KiK-net). Available online: https://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/ (accessed on 5 August 2022).
- Li, S.Y. The Application of Strong Motion Observation. Seismol. Res. Northeast China 2004, 20, 64–73. [Google Scholar]
- Iwan, W.D. The deployment of strong-motion earthquake instrument arrays. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1979, 7, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantieni, R. Assessing a dam’s structural properties using forced vibration testing. In Proceedings of the IABSE International Conference on Safety, Risk and Reliability-Trends in Engineering, Malta, 21–23 March 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Omar, O.; Tounsi, N.; Ng, E.-G.; Elbestawi, M.A. An optimized rational fraction polynomial approach for modal parameters estimation from FRF measurements. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2010, 24, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivasuriyan, A.; Vijayan, D.S.; Górski, W.; Wodzyński, Ł.; Vaverková, M.D.; Koda, E. Practical Implementation of Structural Health Monitoring in Multi-Story Buildings. Buildings 2021, 11, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lerna, M.; Sabbà, M.F.; Diaferio, M.; Carnimeo, L.; Ivorra, S.; Foti, D. Seismic risk assessment of a medieval tower: The case study of Craco. In Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics, Athens, Greece, 23–26 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Foti, D. A new experimental approach to the pushover analysis of masonry buildings. Comput. Struct. 2015, 147, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foti, D.; Debernardis, M.; Paparella, V. Structural safety control of masonry buildings: Non-linear static seismic analysis with a non-linear shear strength criterion. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 4–7 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Araujo, I.G.; Maldonado, E.; Cho, G.C. Ambient vibration testing and updating of the finite element model of a simply supported beam bridge. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 2011, 5, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentile, C.; Saisi, A. Ambient vibration testing and condition assessment of the Paderno iron arch bridge (1889). Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3709–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Loh, C.; Ni, Y. Stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis: Application to super high-rise tower under abnormal loading condition. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2013, 42, 477–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carnimeo, L.; Foti, D.; Vacca, V. On damage monitoring in historical buildings via Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS), Trento, Italy, 9–10 July 2015; pp. 157–161. [Google Scholar]
- Gallipoli, M.R.; Mucciarelli, M.; Castro, R.R.; Monachesi, G.; Contri, P. Structure, soil–structure response and effects of damage based on observations of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of microtremors. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2004, 24, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fäcke, A.; Parolai, S.; Richwalski, S.M.; Stempniewski, L. Assessing the Vibrational Frequencies of the Cathedral of Cologne (Germany) by Means of Ambient Seismic Noise Analysis. Nat. Hazards 2006, 38, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ueshima, T.; Shiojiri, H.; Kanazawa, K. Structural health monitoring of an aged arch dam using long-term continuous observation of ambient vibration/seismic motion. INCOLD J. Half Yrly. Tech. J. Indian Comm. Large Dams 2017, 6, 32–42. [Google Scholar]
- Astorga, A.; Guéguen, P.; Kashima, T. Nonlinear Elasticity Observed in Buildings during a Long Sequence of Earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2018, 108, 1185–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, G.; Liu, L.; Qi, C.; Chen, Q.; Cheng, Y. Structural response analysis of a reinforced concrete building bascd on excitation of microtremors and passing subway trains. Chin. J. Geophys. 2011, 54, 2708–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Ren, Z.; Tian, Y. Structural Seismic Vibration Observation and Identification for the Building of Disaster Reduction Center in Beijing. Technol. Earthq. Disaster Prev. 2015, 10, 539–546. [Google Scholar]
- Çelebi, M. Recorded Earthquake Responses from the Integrated Seismic Monitoring Network of the Atwood Building, Anchorage, Alaska. Earthq. Spectra 2006, 22, 847–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyakoshi, K.; Horike, M. Risky high-rise buildings resonating with the long-period strong ground motions in the Osaka basin, Japan. In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 12–17 October 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Chandramohan, R.; Ma, Q.; Wotherspoon, L.M.; Bradley, B.A.; Nayyerloo, M.; Uma, S.R.; Stephens, M.T. Response of instrumented buildings under the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake. Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng. 2017, 50, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Guo, Z.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.J.; Zou, C.; Song, X. Seismic Monitoring of Super High-Rise Building Using Ambient Noise with Dense Seismic Array. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2020, 92, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB50003-2011; Code for Design of Masonry Structures. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2012.
- GB50011-2010; Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2010.
- Luo, J.; Hong, Y.; Li, C.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Yan, Z. Frequency identification based on power spectral density transmissibility under unknown colored noise excitation. Comput. Struct. 2022, 263, 106741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Xiao, J.F. Modal Analysis for the Framework of Beam Pumping Unit Based on Solidworks Simulation. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 318, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magalhães, F.; Cunha, A.; Caetano, E. Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: From automated OMA to damage detection. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2012, 28, 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhlaghi, M.M.; Bose, S.; Mohammadi, M.E.; Moaveni, B.; Stavridis, A.; Wood, R.L. Post-earthquake damage identification of an RC school building in Nepal using ambient vibration and point cloud data. Eng. Struct. 2021, 227, 111413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asgarian, A.; McClure, G. Impact of seismic rehabilitation and presence of unreinforced masonry (URM) infill walls on the dynamic characteristics of a hospital building in Montreal. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2014, 41, 748–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felber, A.J. Development of a Hybrid Bridge Evaluation System; University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, K.; Li, Q.S.; Han, X.L. Modal Identification of Civil Structures via Stochastic Subspace Algorithm with Monte Carlo–Based Stabilization Diagram. J. Struct. Eng. 2022, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Tang, B.; Tang, G. An improved stochastic subspace identification for operational modal analysis. Measurement 2012, 45, 1246–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobsen, N.-J.; Andersen, P.; Brincker, R. Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis. In Proceedings of the ISMA 2006: International Conference on Noise & Vibration Engineering, Heverlee, Belgium, 18–20 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Konno, K.; Ohmachi, T. Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1998, 88, 228–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, R.; Hu, J.; Zhou, Z. Mode Identification of high-rise reinforced concrete structures based on ambient vibration test. J. Seismol. Res. 2008, 268–273. [Google Scholar]
- Beben, D.; Maleska, T.; Bobra, P.; Duda, J.; Anigacz, W. Influence of Traffic-Induced Vibrations on Humans and Residential Building—A Case Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ivanovic, S.; Trifunac, M. Ambient Vibration Survey of Full Scale Structures Using Personal Computers: With Examples in Kaprielian Hall; University of Southern California: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- SAP2000. Available online: https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000 (accessed on 5 August 2022).
Floor | First Order | Second Order | Third Order | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NS | EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |
28 | 0.557 | 0.884 | 2.441 | 3.071 | 5.447 | 5.796 |
27 | 0.557 | 0.884 | 2.437 | 3.052 | 5.469 | 5.743 |
26 | 0.557 | 0.884 | 2.427 | 2.969 | 5.127 | 5.859 |
25 | 0.548 | 0.874 | 2.412 | 2.939 | 5.532 | 5.713 |
24 | 0.552 | 0.884 | 2.349 | 2.861 | 5.542 | 5.645 |
23 | 0.548 | 0.884 | 2.698 | 2.902 | 5.455 | 5.732 |
22 | 0.547 | 0.884 | 2.573 | 3.320 | 5.322 | 5.752 |
21 | 0.557 | 0.873 | 2.524 | 3.184 | 5.693 | 5.825 |
20 | 0.552 | 0.884 | 2.480 | 3.130 | 5.483 | 5.771 |
19 | 0.557 | 0.884 | 2.466 | 3.130 | 5.387 | 5.637 |
18 | 0.576 | 0.879 | 2.466 | 3.135 | 5.435 | 5.688 |
17 | 0.542 | 0.879 | 2.471 | 3.140 | 5.304 | 5.573 |
16 | 0.557 | 0.879 | 2.461 | 3.110 | 5.273 | 5.469 |
15 | 0.547 | 0.879 | 2.456 | 3.120 | 5.212 | 5.691 |
14 | 0.557 | 0.874 | 2.456 | 3.062 | 5.811 | 5.965 |
13 | 0.562 | 0.861 | 2.451 | 3.066 | 5.835 | 6.064 |
12 | 0.562 | 0.879 | 2.451 | 3.042 | 5.735 | 5.938 |
11 | 0.562 | 0.879 | 2.437 | 3.018 | 5.586 | 5.869 |
10 | 0.552 | 0.890 | 2.471 | 3.047 | 5.654 | 5.864 |
9 | 0.562 | 0.859 | 2.427 | 3.018 | 5.659 | 5.811 |
8 | 0.552 | 0.874 | 2.441 | 3.022 | 5.522 | 5.820 |
7 | 0.543 | 0.879 | 2.422 | 2.964 | 5.420 | 5.786 |
6 | 0.555 | 0.830 | 2.422 | 2.939 | 5.405 | 5.659 |
5 | 0.544 | 0.879 | 2.417 | 2.979 | 5.391 | 5.698 |
Mean | 0.554 | 0.877 | 2.461 | 3.051 | 5.487 | 5.765 |
First-Order | Second-Order | Third-Order | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NS | EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |
Test | 0.554 | 0.877 | 2.461 | 3.051 | 5.487 | 5.765 |
Numerical | 0.570 | 0.975 | 2.288 | 2.924 | 5.332 | 5.683 |
Error (%) | 2.9 | 11.2 | −7.0 | −4.2 | −2.8 | −1.4 |
First Order | Second Order | Third Order | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NS | EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |
Earthquake (Hz) | 0.555 | 0.876 | 2.319 | 3.067 | 5.322 | 5.392 |
Environmental vibration data (Hz) | 0.554 | 0.877 | 2.461 | 3.051 | 5.487 | 5.765 |
Absolute error (Hz) | 0.001 | −0.001 | −0.142 | 0.016 | −0.165 | −0.373 |
Relative error (%) | 0.18 | −0.11 | −5.77 | 0.52 | −3.01 | −6.47 |
First Order | Second Order | Third Order | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NS | EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |
Pre-Earthquake | 0.537 | 0.879 | 2.441 | 3.223 | 5.273 | 5.908 |
Earthquake | 0.555 | 0.876 | 2.319 | 3.067 | 5.322 | 5.392 |
Post-Earthquake | 0.562 | 0.879 | 2.344 | 3.296 | 5.249 | 5.908 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhou, B.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.; Kong, J.; Zhang, C. Natural Vibration Characteristics Analysis of a High-Rise Reinforced Masonry Structure Based on Field Test Data. Buildings 2022, 12, 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091457
Zhou B, Liu B, Wang X, Kong J, Zhang C. Natural Vibration Characteristics Analysis of a High-Rise Reinforced Masonry Structure Based on Field Test Data. Buildings. 2022; 12(9):1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091457
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhou, Baofeng, Bo Liu, Xiaomin Wang, Jingchang Kong, and Cong Zhang. 2022. "Natural Vibration Characteristics Analysis of a High-Rise Reinforced Masonry Structure Based on Field Test Data" Buildings 12, no. 9: 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091457