Next Article in Journal
Safety Risk Assessment Using a BP Neural Network of High Cutting Slope Construction in High-Speed Railway
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal-Nails Waste and Steel Slag Aggregate as Alternative and Eco-Friendly Radiation Shielding Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of the Progressive Failure of Shear Connectors on the Behavior of Steel-Reinforced Concrete Composite Girders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Water-Binder Ratio on the Mechanical Strength and Microstructure of Arch Shell Interface Transition Zone
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

A Bibliometric-Statistical Review of Organic Residues as Cementitious Building Materials

Buildings 2022, 12(5), 597; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050597
by Sergio Yanez, Constanza Márquez, Benjamín Valenzuela and Cristina Alejandra Villamar-Ayala *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Buildings 2022, 12(5), 597; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050597
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 24 April 2022 / Published: 5 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Eco-Friendly Cementitious Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors presented an interesting manuscript. However, there are some suggested corrections that need to be responded before accepting the manuscript:

  1. Please give more information about Infostat 2020e and OriginPro 2020b software.
  2. Please explain, has the effect of the presence of other alternative cement materials in conjunction with agricultural residue been taken into account when studying the mechanical and thermal properties?
  3. Please expand on the deductions regarding tensile and flexural strength in the conclusions section.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I am not able to detect plagiarism, I am sorry I do not have programs.

ANd the paper is well done, only if the title is Review... maybe the number of references must be bigger.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop