Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Impact of Actual and Modeled Occupant Behavior Information Input to Building Performance Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Visual Communication for Students’ Creative Thinking in the Design Studio: Translating Filmic Spaces into Spatial Design
Previous Article in Journal
An Approach to Data Acquisition for Urban Building Energy Modeling Using a Gaussian Mixture Model and Expectation-Maximization Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Critical Review of Computational Creativity in Built Environment Design
Open AccessArticle

A Systematic Review of Design Creativity in the Architectural Design Studio

1
School of Architecture, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
2
Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2021, 11(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010031
Received: 16 December 2020 / Revised: 8 January 2021 / Accepted: 13 January 2021 / Published: 17 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Creativity in Architecture and Engineering)
Creativity is fundamental to design problem-solving. This paper sets out a systematic review of the literature in relation to its role in the architectural design studio in order to identify central issues that impact upon this activity. Challenges and best practices in relation to systematic reviews are outlined, and the procedure followed in this context is set out in detail. This involves an iterative evaluation process that resulted in a pool of 17 papers for analysis. Eleven themes emerged in the analysis of the papers, which were organized into five key categories dealing with: pedagogy, cognitive approach, interaction and socialization, information representation, and measuring ideation and creativity. A discussion of these categories contributed to the comparison and connections between the selected papers, and the identification of critical issues and directions for promoting creativity in the architectural design studio. View Full-Text
Keywords: creativity; ideation; architectural design studio; education; systematic review creativity; ideation; architectural design studio; education; systematic review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Casakin, H.; Wodehouse, A. A Systematic Review of Design Creativity in the Architectural Design Studio. Buildings 2021, 11, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010031

AMA Style

Casakin H, Wodehouse A. A Systematic Review of Design Creativity in the Architectural Design Studio. Buildings. 2021; 11(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Casakin, Hernan; Wodehouse, Andrew. 2021. "A Systematic Review of Design Creativity in the Architectural Design Studio" Buildings 11, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010031

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop