Next Article in Journal
Precipitation Behaviors of Carbides in High Speed Steel during ESR and Heat Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Propagation Laws of Reclamation Risk in Tailings Ponds Using Complex Network Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Technological and Quality Aspects of the Use of Innovative Inorganic Binders in the Production of Castings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monitoring and Analysis of Dynamic Response for Open-Pit Mine with Inside Inclined Shafts under Train Loading
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study and Analysis on the Influence Degree of Particle Settlement Factors in Pipe Transportation of Backfill Slurry

Metals 2021, 11(11), 1780; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11111780
by Chonghao Wang * and Deqing Gan
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Metals 2021, 11(11), 1780; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11111780
Submission received: 7 October 2021 / Revised: 1 November 2021 / Accepted: 3 November 2021 / Published: 5 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Low-Carbon Technology for Metalliferous Minerals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. The quality of the figures is unsatisfactory. They are not clear in hard copy.
  2. In the movement of particles in the fluid, the forces between the particles and the fluid have a significant effect on the deposition. The author do not talk about the forces that you considered in your study clearly. The density of the particles is high and some forces need to be taken into account such as added mass. If you ignore them, you should explain why. Also, you should consider whether the Lift force is significant or not.
  3. In the section 4.1 author, talk about the Drag force. What equation do you use to calculate drag force?
  4. Author do not talk about the quality of the mesh, mesh independency, and fluid flow timestep. These parameters are so crucial in your simulation.
  5. Table 4 presents experimental plan. Author want to investigate the effect of three parameters. You should do an experimental design to find the best value of each parameter and the number of the experiments. In addition, the table 4, is not satisfactory because there are some interactions between parameters, if you want to investigate the effect of the parameters without experimental design you need 27 experimental sets to study the effect of each parameter without interaction effect. In the table 9 and the regression equation, the interaction between 3 parameter is not taken into accounts.
  6. Perhaps it is better to add a contour of the flow pattern of particle deposition in the tube from the COMSOL. Throughout the manuscript, there is a few information about the simulation condition and results.

Author Response

Please find the attachment, thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Modify the title.

Improve the introduction. refer: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114441; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.851; https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2019.1674843; DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03477;

The test sample collected from which mine? write the name and details.

In 4.1, " On the contrary, when the speed is slow, the particles in the slurry are affected by gravity and buoyancy, and move in the vertical direction, leading to sedimentation. When the flow velocity is continuously accelerated, the friction between the slurry and pipe increases, and the pipe is damaged or even burst" is confusing?

In practical, the slurry contains different size particles. viscosity, slurry stability and pressure are the most important parameters to explain the flow behavier. These terms should be included in the study design.

Modify the conclusion.

Author Response

Dear reviewer 2:

         Please see the attachment. Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

A commercial software was used in this paper for modelling.However the current model is very basic and not properly validated with experiments. Without significant contribution, the model and its usages for parametric analysis can not be accepted  

Author Response

Dear reviewer 3:

         Please see the attachment. Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Page 4. What linear dimension was used in determining the Reynolds number? Pipe diameter, paticle size?

Page 6. Y=2.811264002-4.654491543x1+0.007152641406x2-1.4821171688x3-0.017519122657x1x2+2.4067697010x1x3+0.003943149129x2x3  There are too many numbers in the coefficients. You can leave only three or four significant digits. E.g.  Y=2.811-4.654x1+7.153E-3x2-1.482x3-1.752E-2x1
x2+2.407x1x3+3.943E-3x2x3 Three digits after the decimal separator is enough.

Author Response

Dear reviewer 4:

         Please see the attachment. Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Accept 

Back to TopTop