Next Article in Journal
Labor Market Insiders or Outsiders? A Cross-National Examination of Redistributive Preferences of the Working Poor
Next Article in Special Issue
Creating Communities of Choice: Stakeholder Participation in Community Planning
Previous Article in Journal
Young Europeans: A New Political Generation?
Open AccessArticle

Uncovering ‘Community’: Challenging an Elusive Concept in Development and Disaster Related Work

1
Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Institute of Geography, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
2
Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton 01273, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2018, 8(3), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030071
Received: 1 August 2018 / Revised: 24 August 2018 / Accepted: 28 August 2018 / Published: 31 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Development for Equity and Empowerment)
In all areas of academic or practical work related to disaster risk, climate change and development more generally, community and its adjunct community-based have become the default terminology when referring to the local level or working ‘with the people’. The terms are applied extensively to highlight what is believed to be a people-centred, participatory, or grassroot-level approach. Today, despite, or because of, its inherent ambiguity, ‘community’ tends to be used almost inflationarily. This paper aims to analyse the way the concept of ‘community’ has come into fashion, and to critically reflect on the problems that come with it. We are raising significant doubts about the usefulness of ‘community’ in development- and disaster-related work. Our approach is to first consider how ‘community’ has become popular in research and with humanitarian agencies and other organisations based on what can be considered a ‘moral licence’ that supposedly guarantees that the actions being taken are genuinely people-centred and ethically justified. We then explore several theoretical approaches to ‘community’, highlight the vast scope of different (and contested) views on what ‘community’ entails, and explain how ‘community’ is framing practical attempts to mitigate vulnerability and inequity. We demonstrate how these attempts are usually futile, and sometimes harmful, due to the blurriness of ‘community’ concepts and their inherent failure to address the root causes of vulnerability. From two antagonistic positions, we finally advocate more meaningful ways to acknowledge vulnerable people’s views and needs appropriately. View Full-Text
Keywords: community; development; vulnerability; disasters; climate change; participation; governance; identity; belonging; social ties community; development; vulnerability; disasters; climate change; participation; governance; identity; belonging; social ties
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Titz, A.; Cannon, T.; Krüger, F. Uncovering ‘Community’: Challenging an Elusive Concept in Development and Disaster Related Work. Societies 2018, 8, 71.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop