Next Article in Journal
Thinking Through Architecture School: Dilemmas of Designing and Building in Contexts of Inequity
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence and the Reconfiguration of Emotional Well-Being (2020–2025): A Critical Reflection
Previous Article in Special Issue
7S-Based Feeding and Its Impact on the One Health Approach and Human Development in Latin America: An Integrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Promise and the Paradox of Innovation: Understanding Stagnation in the Living Lab Enrekang, Indonesia

1
Post Graduate School, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
2
Social Capital Research Group, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
3
Department of Socio-Economics of Animal Science, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar 90245, Indonesia
4
Communication, Participation and Social Ecological Learning (COPSEL), Van Hall Larenstein, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 9001, 6880 GB Velp, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2026, 16(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010007
Submission received: 24 October 2025 / Revised: 8 December 2025 / Accepted: 17 December 2025 / Published: 25 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Communication Strategies for Building Global Food Networks)

Abstract

The living lab Enrekang, established in 2019 in South Sulawesi, Indonesia, was created to strengthen rural communication and support collaborative innovation across agriculture, livestock, environment, and extension services. Its flagship initiative, the Digital Farmer Field School (DFFS), was co-designed as a digital tool to improve farmers’ access to practical and locally adapted information. The early phase of collaboration generated strong momentum, culminating in a functional prototype tested with farmer groups by 2022. However, progress slowed soon after, revealing a gap between the initiative’s early promise and its subsequent stagnation. This qualitative case study, conducted between December 2024 and June 2025, draws on document reviews, focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and participant observations to analyze how the slowdown emerged and how it altered communication, coordination, and relational expectations among participating actors. Applying the governance-of-innovation lifecycle and a social capital lens, the study shows that political transitions, leadership turnover, staff rotation, and the absence of policy and budgetary anchoring disrupted coordination routines and reduced cross-sector interaction, even as motivation among farmers and frontline staff remained high. The case also highlights the novelty and complexity of the living lab approach, which introduced coordination demands and institutional unfamiliarity that local systems were not yet equipped to absorb. This study contributes to ongoing debates on collaborative innovation by illustrating the vulnerability of living labs when governance arrangements do not evolve alongside innovation milestones. Sustaining similar efforts requires formal anchoring, adaptive coordination, and mechanisms that protect collaboration across political and institutional transitions.
Keywords: living labs; digital farmer field schools (DFFS); participatory communication; rural communication; social capital; innovation governance living labs; digital farmer field schools (DFFS); participatory communication; rural communication; social capital; innovation governance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lairing, N.; Salman, D.; Amrawaty, A.A.; Witteveen, L. The Promise and the Paradox of Innovation: Understanding Stagnation in the Living Lab Enrekang, Indonesia. Societies 2026, 16, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010007

AMA Style

Lairing N, Salman D, Amrawaty AA, Witteveen L. The Promise and the Paradox of Innovation: Understanding Stagnation in the Living Lab Enrekang, Indonesia. Societies. 2026; 16(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lairing, Nurdahalia, Darmawan Salman, A. Amidah Amrawaty, and Loes Witteveen. 2026. "The Promise and the Paradox of Innovation: Understanding Stagnation in the Living Lab Enrekang, Indonesia" Societies 16, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010007

APA Style

Lairing, N., Salman, D., Amrawaty, A. A., & Witteveen, L. (2026). The Promise and the Paradox of Innovation: Understanding Stagnation in the Living Lab Enrekang, Indonesia. Societies, 16(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop