Next Article in Journal
Reconstructing Society Through Memory: Smong, Cultural Trauma, and Community Resilience in Post-Disaster Simeulue, Indonesia
Next Article in Special Issue
When Narratives Belong to Others: Craft Evolution and the Question of Authorship
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Students’ Attitudes Toward the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thinking Through Architecture School: Dilemmas of Designing and Building in Contexts of Inequity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Concept Paper

From Othering to Understanding: Participatory Design as a Practice of Critical Design Thinking

Department of Information Design, School of Communication Studies, Faculty of Business, Communication Studies and Aviation, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada
Societies 2026, 16(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010022
Submission received: 16 September 2025 / Revised: 11 December 2025 / Accepted: 6 January 2026 / Published: 12 January 2026

Abstract

Every act of design tells a story about who belongs, who is seen, and who is heard. This paper looks at how participatory design-based research (PDR), practiced with relational care and reflexivity, can help shift interactions among marginalized youth from urban Indigenous and newcomer immigrant communities in Canada from othering toward understanding. Moving beyond surface-level celebrations of multiculturalism, the study frames design as a relational and ethical practice, one that surfaces assumptions, holds space for difference, and creates openings for intercultural dialogue. The study draws on a series of design circles (d.circles) in which youth co-created visual communication artefacts reflecting their lived experiences. These artefacts became catalysts for dialogue, enabling participants to challenge stereotypes, articulate concerns, and develop shared perspectives. Reflexivity was integral to the process, guiding both participants and the facilitator to consider power, positionality, and relational accountability throughout. Findings show that participatory design, grounded in Indigenous relational principles and participatory action research, can unsettle dominant narratives, foster mutual recognition, and support youth-led meaning-making. This work contributes to emerging conversations that position design thinking as a practice of ethical engagement rather than a tool for problem-solving alone. The learnings from this study show how critically practiced PDR can cultivate more inclusive and socially responsive pathways for intercultural understanding to take shape.
Keywords: design thinking; participatory design research; intercultural understanding; co-creation; critical design thinking; cultural pedagogy; reflexivity; othering; relationality design thinking; participatory design research; intercultural understanding; co-creation; critical design thinking; cultural pedagogy; reflexivity; othering; relationality

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mumtaz, N. From Othering to Understanding: Participatory Design as a Practice of Critical Design Thinking. Societies 2026, 16, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010022

AMA Style

Mumtaz N. From Othering to Understanding: Participatory Design as a Practice of Critical Design Thinking. Societies. 2026; 16(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mumtaz, Naureen. 2026. "From Othering to Understanding: Participatory Design as a Practice of Critical Design Thinking" Societies 16, no. 1: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010022

APA Style

Mumtaz, N. (2026). From Othering to Understanding: Participatory Design as a Practice of Critical Design Thinking. Societies, 16(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop