Next Article in Journal
A Pilot Study to Examine the Impact of Beta-Alanine Supplementation on Anaerobic Exercise Performance in Collegiate Rugby Athletes
Previous Article in Journal
An Evaluation of Heart Rate Variability in Female Youth Soccer Players Following Soccer Heading: A Pilot Study
Open AccessArticle

Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei

1
Kinesiology Department, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA 93955, USA
2
Mathematics and Statistics Department, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA 93955, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sports 2019, 7(11), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7110230
Received: 30 September 2019 / Revised: 1 November 2019 / Accepted: 5 November 2019 / Published: 7 November 2019
The Assess2Perform Bar Sensei is a device used to measure barbell velocity for velocity-based training that has not yet been validated. The purpose of this study was to determine criterion validity and reliability of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei in barbell back squats by comparing it against the GymAware PowerTool, a previously validated instrument. Sixteen injury-free, resistance-trained subjects (eleven males and five females) were recruited. Subjects were tested for their back squat one repetition maximum (1RM). Then, on two separate days, subjects performed two sets of three repetitions at loads of 45%, 60% and 75% 1RM. The GymAware PowerTool and Bar Sensei were attached to the barbell in similar locations for concurrent collection of mean concentric velocity (MCV) and peak concentric velocity (PCV). The Bar Sensei and PowerTool showed generally fair to poor agreement for MCV and PCV when subjects lifted 45% of 1RM (intraclass correlation;ICC 0.4–0.59), and they showed poor agreement when subjects lifted 60% and 75% of 1RM (ICC 0.3–0.4). Inter-repetition/within-set reliability for the Bar Sensei ranged between ICC = 0.273–0.451 for MCV and PCV compared to the far more reliable PowerTool (ICC = 0.651–0.793). Currently, the Bar Sensei is not a reliable or valid tool for measuring barbell velocity in back squats. View Full-Text
Keywords: velocity-based training; accelerometer; autoregulation; inertial measurement unit; resistance training velocity-based training; accelerometer; autoregulation; inertial measurement unit; resistance training
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Beckham, G.K.; Layne, D.K.; Kim, S.B.; Martin, E.A.; Perez, B.G.; Adams, K.J. Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Assess2Perform Bar Sensei. Sports 2019, 7, 230.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop