Reliability and Validity of the Early Years Physical Activity Questionnaire (EY-PAQ)
Daniel D. Bingham 1,2,*, Paul J. Collings 1, Stacy A. Clemes 2, Silvia Costa 3
, Gillian Santorelli 1, Paula Griffiths 2 and Sally E. Barber 1
, Gillian Santorelli 1, Paula Griffiths 2 and Sally E. Barber 1
1
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
2
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK
3
Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Eling Douwe de Bruin
Sports 2016, 4(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports4020030
Received: 8 February 2016 / Revised: 9 May 2016 / Accepted: 11 May 2016 / Published: 26 May 2016
Abstract
Measuring physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) in young children (<5 years) is complex. Objective measures have high validity but require specialist expertise, are expensive, and can be burdensome for participants. A proxy-report instrument for young children that accurately measures PA and ST is needed. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Early Years Physical Activity Questionnaire (EY-PAQ). In a setting where English and Urdu are the predominant languages spoken by parents of young children, a sample of 196 parents and their young children (mean age 3.2 ± 0.8 years) from Bradford, UK took part in the study. A total of 156 (79.6%) questionnaires were completed in English and 40 (20.4%) were completed in transliterated Urdu. A total of 109 parents took part in the reliability aspect of the study, which involved completion of the EY-PAQ on two occasions (7.2 days apart; standard deviation (SD) = 1.1). All 196 participants took part in the validity aspect which involved comparison of EY-PAQ scores against accelerometry. Validty anaylsis used all data and data falling with specific MVPA and ST boundaries. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlations (ICC) and validity by Bland–Altman plots and rank correlation coefficients. The test re-test reliability of the EY-PAQ was moderate for ST (ICC = 0.47) and fair for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)(ICC = 0.35). The EY-PAQ had poor agreement with accelerometer-determined ST (mean difference = −87.5 min·day−1) and good agreement for MVPA (mean difference = 7.1 min·day−1) limits of agreement were wide for all variables. The rank correlation coefficient was non-significant for ST (rho = 0.19) and significant for MVPA (rho = 0.30). The EY-PAQ has comparable validity and reliability to other PA self-report tools and is a promising population-based measure of young children’s habitual MVPA but not ST. In situations when objective methods are not possible for measurement of young children’s MVPA, the EY-PAQ may be a suitable alternative but only if boundaries are applied. View Full-TextKeywords:
physical activity; sedentary behaviour; measurement; self-report; preschool; children; accelerometry; ethnicity
▼
Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Bingham, D.D.; Collings, P.J.; Clemes, S.A.; Costa, S.; Santorelli, G.; Griffiths, P.; Barber, S.E. Reliability and Validity of the Early Years Physical Activity Questionnaire (EY-PAQ). Sports 2016, 4, 30.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.