Next Article in Journal
Somatometric, Training, and Behavioral Profiles of Resistance Training Practitioners and Recreational Exercisers in Greece: A Multivariate Comparative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuromuscular Performance Characteristics of Elite Colombian Sunfish Sailors: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Sensory Processing Patterns and Motor Proficiency in Youth Football Players: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Training Practices Among Spanish Natural Elite Bodybuilders in the Pre-Contest Phase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Eccentric vs. Concentric Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Performance and Health Benefits Across Diverse Populations

by
Carolina Oassé Paulafreitas Maia
1,
Diego Ignácio Vanezuela Pérez
2,*,
Rafael Pereira Azevedo Teixeira
1,
Ciro José Brito
3,
Esteban Aedo-Muñoz
4 and
Bianca Miarka
1,*
1
Laboratório de Psicofisiologia e Performance em Esportes e Combates, Departamento de Lutas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-599, Brazil
2
Facultad de Salud y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de las Américas, Santiago 7500975, Chile
3
Departamento de Educação Física, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil
4
Departamento de Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Ñuñoa 7760197, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sports 2026, 14(3), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14030119
Submission received: 23 August 2025 / Revised: 25 September 2025 / Accepted: 24 October 2025 / Published: 18 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuromuscular Performance: Insights for Athletes and Beyond)

Abstract

Eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle training produce distinct physiological responses, with potential implications for musculoskeletal, metabolic, and cardiovascular health. Therefore, our objective is to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of ECC and CON training on strength, hypertrophy, metabolic function, and cardiovascular health across diverse adult populations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024627600). The review included eight randomized controlled trials, pooling data from a total of 441 participants. For strength-related outcomes, six studies (n = 322) were included; for hypertrophy, four studies (n = 210); and for cardiovascular measures, three studies (n = 154). Studies were assessed using the TESTEX scale. Standardized mean differences and random-effects models were applied (p ≤ 0.05). Results indicated that ECC training consistently produced moderate to large improvements in muscle strength (pooled ES = 0.95; I2 = 78.6%) and hypertrophy (pooled ES = 0.60; I2 = 62.3%), particularly in populations with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and older adults. The rate of force development (RFD) showed large effect sizes for ECC (RFD50: ES = 0.97; RFD100: ES = 0.95) but minimal change for CON (RFD50: ES = 0.04; RFD100: ES = 0.10). Both ECC and CON showed minimal effects on cardiovascular outcomes (heart rate and blood pressure: pooled ES range = −0.16 to 0.00; I2 = 41.8%) and limited tendon remodeling (ES = −0.18). In conclusion, ECC exercise demonstrates superior benefits for improving muscular strength, hypertrophy, and power across varied populations, particularly those with clinical conditions such as COPD. Its impact on cardiovascular health and tendon properties, however, appears limited. These findings support the integration of ECC modalities into targeted rehabilitation and performance programs.
Keywords: athletic training; rehabilitation; muscle strength; hypertrophy; cardiovascular health athletic training; rehabilitation; muscle strength; hypertrophy; cardiovascular health

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maia, C.O.P.; Pérez, D.I.V.; Teixeira, R.P.A.; Brito, C.J.; Aedo-Muñoz, E.; Miarka, B. Eccentric vs. Concentric Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Performance and Health Benefits Across Diverse Populations. Sports 2026, 14, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14030119

AMA Style

Maia COP, Pérez DIV, Teixeira RPA, Brito CJ, Aedo-Muñoz E, Miarka B. Eccentric vs. Concentric Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Performance and Health Benefits Across Diverse Populations. Sports. 2026; 14(3):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14030119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maia, Carolina Oassé Paulafreitas, Diego Ignácio Vanezuela Pérez, Rafael Pereira Azevedo Teixeira, Ciro José Brito, Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, and Bianca Miarka. 2026. "Eccentric vs. Concentric Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Performance and Health Benefits Across Diverse Populations" Sports 14, no. 3: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14030119

APA Style

Maia, C. O. P., Pérez, D. I. V., Teixeira, R. P. A., Brito, C. J., Aedo-Muñoz, E., & Miarka, B. (2026). Eccentric vs. Concentric Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Performance and Health Benefits Across Diverse Populations. Sports, 14(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14030119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop