Next Article in Journal
Mitochondrial D-Loop Region Methylation Is Not Altered in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Compounds as Epimodulators in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Many Faces of SetDB1

by
Stanislav E. Romanov
1,2 and
Dmitry E. Koryakov
1,*
1
Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
2
Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Epigenomes 2026, 10(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes10020024
Submission received: 17 February 2026 / Revised: 3 March 2026 / Accepted: 30 March 2026 / Published: 1 April 2026

Abstract

The conserved protein SetDB1 has been identified in various vertebrate and invertebrate groups. It plays key roles in vital processes such as germline and nervous system development, immune response, tumorigenesis, cell cycle progression, and others. SetDB1 is initially characterized as an enzyme that methylates lysine 9 on histone H3, leading to gene silencing, which is traditionally considered its primary function. However, SetDB1 also targets about a dozen nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane proteins as substrates. Moreover, some functions of SetDB1 do not require methyltransferase activity. Due to its SUMO-interacting motif, Tudor domain, and methyl-binding domains, SetDB1 interacts with a wide range of complexes that regulate protein stability and activity, signal transduction pathways, and chromatin spatial organization. In this review, we aim to expand the classical view of SetDB1 as solely a histone methyltransferase and to highlight the broader diversity of its functions.

1. Introduction

SetDB1, also known as KMT1E (Lysine Methyltransferase 1E), is a conserved protein first identified in humans [1,2], followed by its discovery in mice (referred to as Eset) [3], the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (known as MET-2) [4,5], and Drosophila (as dSetDB1 or Eggless/Egg) [6,7]. In mammals, its paralog SetDB2 has also been characterized; it differs from SetDB1 in size, domain composition, and expression profile across various tissues [8,9,10] (Figure 1).
The activity of SetDB1 is essential for cell proliferation, differentiation, fertility, and development. For example, SetDB1 mutations in Drosophila lead to female sterility and significantly reduce the viability of imagoes [7,11,12]. In C. elegans, the absence of MET-2 causes ectopic expression of germline genes in somatic cells [13]. In mice, a mutation in SetDB1 exhibits defective growth of the inner cell mass and the incapability of deriving stem cell lines in the embryo [14], whereas conditional deletion of SetDB1 severely impairs male and female meiosis [15,16,17], as well as development of various somatic tissues [18,19]. Aberrant expression of SetDB1 in humans is implicated in the pathogenesis of various diseases, predominantly cancer [20,21].
SetDB1 possesses a highly conserved SET domain, which is divided into two subdomains by a long insertion, giving the protein its name—SET Domain Bifurcated 1 [1] (Figure 1). The function of this domain is the methylation of lysine side chain, with the first identified substrate of SetDB1 being lysine 9 in histone H3 (H3K9) [2,3]. This epigenetic modification is most often regarded as SetDB1’s primary activity, and its absence is considered responsible for the disturbances observed in mutants. However, functions of SetDB1 extend beyond H3K9 methylation. The enzyme contains several domains (Figure 1) that significantly broaden its range of interactions with other proteins. Due to the presence of nuclear localization and nuclear export signals, SetDB1 can shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus [22,23,24,25,26,27], indicating that some of its functions occur outside chromatin. However, even when associated with chromosomes, SetDB1 does not always colocalize with H3K9 methylation [26,28,29], suggesting that it either modifies other proteins or performs functions independent of its enzymatic activity.
Figure 1. Domain organization of SetDB1 and SetDB2 molecules in different organisms. Protein lengths and domain positions are based on information from the UniProt database (Release 2024_04), with additions from the following articles: [10,24,27,30,31,32]. The UniProt sequence number is indicated after each protein name. Positions of ubiquitinated lysines (K867, K884, K1085) are taken from [30,33,34]. Note that in the original article on mouse SetDB1, the ubiquitination site is reported as K885; however, in the UniProt sequence O88974, this lysine is at position 884. SUMOylated lysines (K1050, K1067) are from [35] and the PhosphoSitePlus database [36]. NES—nuclear export signal; NLS—nuclear localization signal; SIM—SUMO-interacting motif; MBD—Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain; aa—amino acids; ub—ubiquitination site; SUMO—SUMOylation site.
Figure 1. Domain organization of SetDB1 and SetDB2 molecules in different organisms. Protein lengths and domain positions are based on information from the UniProt database (Release 2024_04), with additions from the following articles: [10,24,27,30,31,32]. The UniProt sequence number is indicated after each protein name. Positions of ubiquitinated lysines (K867, K884, K1085) are taken from [30,33,34]. Note that in the original article on mouse SetDB1, the ubiquitination site is reported as K885; however, in the UniProt sequence O88974, this lysine is at position 884. SUMOylated lysines (K1050, K1067) are from [35] and the PhosphoSitePlus database [36]. NES—nuclear export signal; NLS—nuclear localization signal; SIM—SUMO-interacting motif; MBD—Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain; aa—amino acids; ub—ubiquitination site; SUMO—SUMOylation site.
Epigenomes 10 00024 g001

2. SetDB1 and H3K9 Methylation

SetDB1 methylates lysine 9 on free histone H3 in the cytoplasm and also modifies H3 within nucleosomes in the nucleus. In the cytoplasm, SetDB1 adds the first and partially the second methyl groups to H3K9 [22,23,25], a process that may occur during translation when the newly synthesized H3 molecule is still associated with the ribosome [37]. In the nucleus, SetDB1 adds the third methyl group to H3K9, a step that requires interaction with the conserved protein ATF7IP (MCAF1) in humans, or its orthologs mAM in mice, LIN-65 in nematodes, and Wde in Drosophila [27,30,38,39,40,41].
ATF7IP modulates SetDB1’s enzymatic activity, shifting it from mono-/dimethylation to trimethylation, and facilitates its binding to chromosomes [42,43]. Additionally, ATF7IP stimulates the ubiquitination of a conserved lysine within the SET domain insertion (K867 in humans, K884 in mice, and K1085 in Drosophila) [30,41] (Figure 1), which is essential for SetDB1’s catalytic activity [33,34,44]. Through the interaction of two ATF7IP molecules with the N-terminus of SetDB1, nuclear export signals are blocked [27,41,45], preventing SetDB1 from binding to the nuclear export receptor CRM1 (also known as XPO1) and thereby retaining SetDB1 in the nucleus [24,25,27,45]. In male germline cells, the ATF7IP ortholog ATF7IP2 (MCAF2) similarly forms a complex with SetDB1 [45,46,47].
In mammals, the targets of SetDB1 include both unique and repetitive sequences, among which endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) constitute a significant proportion. H3K9 methylation, primarily established by SetDB1, is the main mechanism for ERV inactivation in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) [48,49,50]. In somatic cells, such as developing B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, and brain cells, ERV silencing occurs through SetDB1-mediated H3K9 methylation in conjunction with DNA methylation [51,52,53,54].
DNA motifs within ERVs serve as recognition sites for a large family of proteins containing zinc-finger domains—ZNF or ZFP. Through their KRAB domain, ZNF/ZFP proteins bind the SUMO ligase KAP1 (also known as TRIM28), which recruits SetDB1 and other chromatin modifiers to ERVs, thereby inducing H3K9 methylation and ERV silencing [50,55,56]. The interaction between KAP1 and SetDB1 is mediated by the autoSUMOylated bromodomain in KAP1 and the SUMO-interacting motif at the N-terminus of SetDB1 [31] (Figure 1 and Figure 2a). In Drosophila, a similar process occurs, with SetDB1 binding to the SUMOylated ortholog of KAP1—Bonus [57].
Another mechanism for target inactivation involves the interaction of SetDB1/ATF7IP with the Human Silencing Hub (HUSH) complex [43,58,59]. One subunit of the HUSH complex, MPP8, contains a chromodomain that recognizes K9me3 in H3, K16me3 in ATF7IP, and K1170me3 in SetDB1 [60,61,62,63]. MPP8 partially colocalizes with SetDB1/ATF7IP at genes and various types of repeats, and deletion of either SetDB1 or MPP8 results in activation of these sequences [64].
There are different models describing the interaction between SetDB1 and the HUSH complex. For example, SetDB1 methylates H3K9, after which MPP8 binds to the methylated site via its chromodomain. This establishes an inactive chromatin state, and for its maintenance, only the HUSH complex is required, while H3K9me3 and SetDB1 are no longer necessary [65]. According to another model, MPP8, upon binding to H3K9me3, recruits SetDB1/ATF7IP to the locus to maintain and spread H3K9 methylation [58]. Different MPP8 molecules within the HUSH complex perform distinct functions, with one binding to H3K9me3 and another interacting with SetDB1/ATF7IP to methylate H3K9 on neighboring nucleosomes [63] (Figure 2b).
In addition to repetitive sequences, SetDB1 targets tissue- and stage-specific genes [28,51,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Several mechanisms recruit SetDB1 to these targets, which may be similar to those involved in repetitive sequence regulation, as described above [2,64,65,72]. Additionally, various transcription factors can mediate SetDB1 recruitment; for example, SUMOylated Sp3 recruits SetDB1 to promoters through interaction with its SUMO-interacting motif [73]. Another transcription factor, RelB, recruits two methyltransferases, SetDB1 and G9a, to the interleukin 17 locus [74], while Smad3 recruits SetDB1 and Suv39h1 to interleukin 2 [75]. The multidomain transcription factor POGZ recruits SetDB1/KAP1 to ERVs and the Dux gene promoter in mESCs [76], as well as to telomeres of ALT-positive (Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres) human tumor cells [77]. The binding of SetDB1 to both genes and ERVs can also be mediated by JARID1B or JARID2 [78,79]. Although these proteins belong to the family of demethylases, JARID2 is catalytically inactive due to its structural features [80], and the interaction of SetDB1 with JARID1B is independent of its demethylase activity [79]. The list of proteins recruiting SetDB1 to chromatin can be extended further.
An important prerequisite for H3K9 methylation is the SUMOylation of a lysine residue in the middle of the SET domain (K1050 in humans or K1067 in mice, Figure 1). Without this modification, H3K9 methylation does not occur [35,81]. SUMOylation does not affect SetDB1’s nuclear entry or catalytic activity but is necessary for its binding to chromatin [82]. Another study found that the same lysine, K1050 (along with K182), in human SetDB1 can be polyubiquitinated, leading to proteasomal degradation of the protein. To prevent this, the C-terminus of SetDB1 interacts with the protein IRTKS, which recruits the deubiquitinase OTUD4 to SetDB1, removing the polyubiquitin chain [83].

3. SetDB1 and Active Histone Marks

Examples from the previous section fit into a model in which SetDB1, through various intermediaries, interacts with chromatin and methylates H3K9, leading to target inactivation. In this context, the presence of H3K9me2/me3 usually implies the absence of modifications characteristic of active transcription. However, this representation is a significant simplification, and relationships of SetDB1 with different histone modifications are far from straightforward.
SetDB1 is not the only enzyme that methylates H3K9; for example, in Drosophila, at least two other such enzymes are known (Su(var)3–9 and G9a), and in humans, there are nine more (SUV39H1, SUV39H2, G9A, GLP, PRDM2, PRDM3, PRDM8, PRDM16, and SetDB2, which is already mentioned above) [84]. Analysis of SetDB1 profiles on the chromosomes of mice, humans, and Drosophila has revealed regions where SetDB1 is present but H3K9 methylation is absent [26,28,29,72]. In other words, SetDB1 is neither necessary nor sufficient by itself for the establishment of H3K9me2/me3 marks across the entire genome. Moreover, in regions lacking H3K9me3, SetDB1 can colocalize with active chromatin marks [26], and SetDB1 targets can be transcribed [29,66]. It is also worth noting that SetDB1-mediated H3K9 methylation can have different functions and, under certain conditions, may even promote active expression. For example, the silencing of transposable elements in the Drosophila female germline is ensured by a piwiRNA-based mechanism [85], a key step of which is the transcription of piwiRNA clusters that requires SetDB1-dependent H3K9 methylation [86]. Interestingly, H3K9me2 is also present in these clusters in somatic cells, but there the methylation depends on Su(var)3–9, and the clusters remain inactive [87].
In undifferentiated mammalian cells, the promoter regions of some genes encoding transcription factors contain both active and repressive marks simultaneously. Such bivalent domains maintain low-level transcription of genes while keeping them poised for rapid activation. The first identified bivalent domains contained H3K4 and H3K27 methylation [88], and later domains with H3K4me3 and SetDB1-mediated H3K9me3 were discovered [89]. Additionally, SetDB1 is found in domains where H3K9 methylation and H3K14 acetylation coexist [32,90].
Another type of domains combines H3K36 and SetDB1-mediated H3K9 methylations [91]. These domains may have different functions. For example, they were found in the 3′ regions of transcriptionally active human genes encoding ZNFs. In this case, H3K9me3 is not involved in repressing transcription but rather serves to create a chromatin structure that can inhibit inappropriate homologous recombination between different highly related ZNF genes [92]. The same pair of modifications is also required for alternative lengthening of telomeres [93]. Colocalization of H3K9me3 and NSD1/2/3-mediated H3K36me2/me3, called dual domains, occurs in some lowly expressed genes and specific enhancers in human cells and mESCs [91,94].
Both bivalent and dual domains are not simply overlaps of different modifications; there is a functional connection between them, forming a special type of chromatin. For example, H3K9me3 and H3K36me3 coexist on the same histone tail, and removal of SetDB1 leads to the loss of both modifications [91]. H3K14 acetylation in Drosophila and mammals is required for SetDB1 recruitment and subsequent H3K9 methylation on the same nucleosome [95,96]. Different types of bivalent domains may also be interconnected. For instance, in mESCs, the promoters of the adipogenic master regulatory genes Cebpa and Pparg are enriched with H3K27me3 and H3K4me3. In preadipocytes, H3K4me3 is retained upstream of transcription start sites, while H3K27 methylation is replaced by SetDB1-mediated H3K9 methylation downstream of transcription start sites [89].

4. SetDB1 and Methylation of Non-Histone Proteins

In addition to histone H3, SetDB1 has several other nuclear, cytoplasmic, and transmembrane proteins as substrates. By attaching methyl groups to these proteins, SetDB1 influences their activity or stability. Moreover, in humans, SetDB1 is capable of automethylation at lysine residues K490 and K1162. These modifications do not affect SetDB1’s catalytic activity but are necessary for its interaction with the HP1 protein, which is required for the subsequent maintenance and spreading of H3K9me3 [97] (Figure 2c).
SetDB1 modulates the activity of p53- and PI3K/AKT-dependent pathways, playing important roles in transducing pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic signals, respectively [98]. SetDB1 dimethylates lysine 370 in the transcription factor p53, thereby stimulating its phosphorylation at serine 15, which protects p53 from ubiquitination and degradation [99]. But besides that, SetDB1 can directly repress Trp53 activity (the gene encoding p53) by methylating H3K9 at its promoter region, leading to transcriptional silencing [100].
One component of the PI3K/AKT-dependent pathway is the serine/threonine kinase AKT1, in which SetDB1 trimethylates lysines K140 and K142. These modifications promote subsequent phosphorylation of AKT1 at positions T308 and S473, enhancing its kinase activity. The methylated lysines K140 and K142 serve as binding sites for the Tudor domains of SetDB1, allowing it to methylate another site in AKT1—lysine K64 [101] (Figure 2d). This modification recruits the demethylase JMJD2A, which acts as a bridge between AKT1 and the ubiquitin ligases TRAF6 and Skp2-SCF. This sequence of events promotes AKT1 ubiquitination, recruitment to the cell membrane, and activation [102].
The next pathway involving SetDB1 includes the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor HIF-1α, which regulates numerous effector genes governing proliferation, energy metabolism, invasion, and metastasis [103]. The long non-coding RNA LINC00115 acts as a scaffold, facilitating the binding of SetDB1 (via its Tudor domain) and the serine/threonine kinase PLK3. SetDB1 methylates lysines K106 and K200 in PLK3, suppressing its kinase activity and thereby preventing PLK3-mediated phosphorylation of HIF-1α. This process increases HIF-1α stability [104,105] (Figure 2e).
Another pathway influenced by SetDB1 involves the transmembrane protein CD147 (also known as Basigin). SetDB1 dimethylates lysine K71 in CD147, triggering a cascade that leads to phosphorylation of the transcription factor p38, activation of the FosB gene, and induction of apoptosis [106]. Closely associated with CD147 is the lactate transporter MCT1, which is trimethylated by SetDB1 at lysine K473. This modification prevents MCT1 degradation, enhances lactate export, and promotes tumor cell glycolysis [107].
SetDB1 also modifies the transcriptional coactivator PC4, which regulates oscillations in mRNA levels of genes involved in cell cycle progression. For example, during the early G2 phase, PC4 binds the mRNA of the gene encoding the outer kinetochore component CENPF. This interaction recruits SetDB1, which dimethylates lysine K35 in PC4. Subsequently, PC4 associates with the RNA helicase UPF1, leading to degradation of CENPF mRNA in the late G2 phase [108].
SetDB1 regulates the transcription of ribosomal DNA. A key element in this process is the Upstream Binding Factor (UBF), which maintains an open chromatin state in the ribosomal gene cluster [109]. SetDB1 inactivates UBF through trimethylation of lysines K232 and K254, leading to chromatin condensation and reduced transcription levels [110]. In addition to the aforementioned proteins, SetDB1 also methylates the inhibitor of growth ING2 [111] and the regulatory protein Tat from human immunodeficiency virus [112]. Furthermore, substrates of SetDB1 appear to include the cytoplasmic kinase ASK1 [113], subunits of the ubiquitin ligase complex TRIM71, which is involved in RNA processing [114], as well as Serpinh1, a regulator of pro-collagen folding and maturation [115].
It is interesting to note that the activity of other H3K9-specific enzymes, such as G9a and GLP, is also not limited to H3K9. G9a and GLP tend to modify lysines that are part of the histone-mimic motif A(R/K)K(S/T), which resembles the H3K9-containing sequence. The amino acids surrounding SetDB1-methylated lysines match this motif only in SetDB1 itself, whereas in other proteins, the histone-mimic motif is degenerate or absent (Figure 3).

5. Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain of SetDB1

In the middle part of the SetDB1 molecule lies the Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain (MBD) (Figure 1), which suggests a potential direct link between H3K9 methylation and DNA methylation. Although this connection is often assumed, SetDB1 itself has not been observed to directly bind methylated DNA. Instead, this interaction is mediated by the protein MBD1, which recruits SetDB1 to DNA through its binding with ATF7IP [118,119,120] (Figure 2f).
SetDB1 directly interacts with the DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B [121], and DNMT3L enhances the binding between DNMT3A and SetDB1 [122]. Loss of SetDB1 disrupts the telomeric binding of DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and DNMT3L [93]. Deletion of SetDB1 results in reduced H3K9 and DNA methylation levels at specific loci in mESCs [123]. However, genes upregulated in SetDB1-deficient mESCs, with few exceptions, do not overlap with those upregulated in cells deficient for DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B [49]. Other studies show that DNMTs and SetDB1 act through distinct pathways to repress germ cell-related genes in mESCs [124], and triple knockout of DNMT1/3A/3B does not affect SetDB1 binding or SetDB1-dependent H3K9 methylation [48]. Thus, the interaction between DNA methylation and SetDB1-mediated H3K9 methylation cannot be explained by a simple model. Further complicating this relationship is the presence of the MBD in Drosophila SetDB1 and C. elegans MET-2, despite the long-held belief that DNA methylation is absent or extremely low in these organisms [125,126].
Insight into the function of the MBD is provided by a study investigating the 3D structure of this domain in human SetDB1 and SetDB2. The domain was found to be noncanonical, comprising a conserved core and a unique N-terminal extension. Consequently, the MBD has lost its ability to bind methylated DNA but has gained a protein–protein interaction surface that allows it to bind to C11orf46 (also known as ARL14EP) [127]. On the C11orf46 side, recognition of SetDB1 occurs through its cysteine-rich domain (CRD) [128]. It is highly likely that this interaction via the MBD and CRD also occurs in other organisms, as orthologs of C11orf46 are found in nematodes (ARLE-14) and Drosophila (CG14464). Moreover, interactions between these orthologs and MET-2 or SetDB1 have been detected [39,129,130].
It is hypothesized that C11orf46 acts as a mediator for the binding of the SetDB1/ATF7IP/KAP1 complex to chromatin, as proteins associated with C11orf46 include SetDB1, KAP1, ATF7IP, and histone H3. Furthermore, different regions of the C11orf46 molecule are responsible for interactions with SetDB1 and histone H3 [128] (Figure 2g). Similarly, in C. elegans, ARLE-14 helps recruit MET-2 to chromatin [39,40]. In Drosophila, the CG14464 protein has not yet been studied.

6. Tudor Domains of SetDB1

At the N-terminus of SetDB1 lie the Tudor domains (TDs) (Figure 1). Initial studies identified one or two TDs in SetDB1, but later, a tandem triple Tudor domain (TTD) was discovered. In addition to the proteins and RNAs previously mentioned, the TTD in mammalian SetDB1 can bind to histone H3 carrying both K14 acetylation and K9 methylation. TD3 preferentially recognizes K9me1 or K9me2, while TD2 selectively binds K9me3; TD1, however, is unable to bind methylated lysines. The region between TD2 and TD3 is responsible for interaction with K14ac [32]. The TTD in Drosophila SetDB1 has different properties, as it shares only 33% homology with the human SetDB1 TTD. The region recognizing H3K14ac retains the highest degree of homology, whereas TD2 and TD3 lack the amino acids required for interaction with H3K9me [96]. In mammals, binding of the TTD to H3K14ac or H3K9me separately is much weaker than binding to their combination [32], whereas in Drosophila, recognition of H3K14ac is independent of H3K9 methylation [96].
There is a functional link between the TTD and the SET domain. The synthetic molecule (R,R)-59 (also known as SETDB1-TTD-IN-1) binds to the TTD and completely prevents its association with H3 [131]. This interaction blocks methylation of lysines in H3 and ASK1 [113,132], but unexpectedly increases K64 methylation and subsequent T308 phosphorylation in AKT1 [133]. Another synthetic molecule, UNC10013, binds to the same TTD region as (R,R)-59 but inhibits the methyltransferase activity of SetDB1 toward AKT1 [134]. Two natural compounds—emetine from the plant Carapichea ipecacuanha and echinomycin from the actinomycete Streptomyces echinatus—also bind to the TTD and prevent H3K9 methylation [135,136].
The region of human SetDB1 between residues 279 and 329, where TD2 is located, can bind the chain of ubiquitin-like proteins Nedd8. This interaction enables SetDB1 to form a complex with the neddylated kinase PDK1 and other proteins, facilitating subsequent methylation and phosphorylation of AKT1 [137].

7. SetDB1 and Polycomb Group Proteins

In addition to H3K9-mediated silencing, SetDB1 is also associated with another epigenetic system involving H3K27 methylation and Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, which form several Polycomb Repressive Complexes (PRCs). In Drosophila, H3K27 methylation is carried out by the PRC2 complex, which contains the enzyme E(z) [138,139], and H3K27me3 serves as a docking site for the Polycomb (Pc) chromodomain within PRC1 [140,141]. In mammals, this system is more intricate because PcG proteins have multiple paralogs and form various complex variants. For example, there are six canonical and several non-canonical variants of PRC1 [142,143], and five types of Pc proteins: CBX2, CBX4, CBX6, CBX7, and CBX8 [144,145].
The interaction between SetDB1 and PcG proteins, as well as with H3K27me3, occurs through distinct mechanisms. For instance, their cooperative function may be seen as a “summation” of their repressive effects. A subset of developmental genes in mESCs is repressed by both PcG and SetDB1, with target genes enriched for both H3K9me3 and H3K27me3. Disruption of either PcG- or SetDB1-mediated repression can destabilize the stem cell state [66]. Additionally, a stepwise mechanism exists by which SetDB1 and PRC1.6 repress germline genes in mouse embryos, with PRC1.6 required for SetDB1-mediated H3K9 methylation at bound genes [146,147]. MGA, a scaffolding component of PRC1.6, recruits SetDB1 via its interaction with ATF7IP to meiosis-related genes in mESCs. Thus, MGA plays a dual role: it is central in establishing a PcG-dependent repressive state and subsequently strengthens repression by recruiting the SetDB1/ATF7IP complex to induce H3K9me3 modifications [148].
The relationship between SetDB1 and PcG may be more complex when one system indirectly regulates the activity of the other. For example, high expression of EZH2 (the mammalian ortholog of Drosophila E(z)) in cancer cells leads to H3K27 methylation at the miR-381 promoter, suppressing its expression. Normally, miR-381 represses SetDB1, but in the presence of excess EZH2, SetDB1 is aberrantly upregulated. Subsequently, SetDB1 methylates AKT1, thereby promoting cell proliferation [149,150,151]. Additionally, EZH2 suppresses the transcription factor RUNX3, which allows SetDB1 expression. Inactivation of EZH2 upregulates RUNX3 and, consequently, downregulates SetDB1 [152]. SetDB1 also regulates EZH2: SetDB1 knockdown reduces EZH2 expression, whereas SetDB1 overexpression increases EZH2 levels. Furthermore, SetDB1, in complex with the deubiquitinase USP11, protects several proteins—including EZH2—from ubiquitination and degradation. Notably, this protective function is attributed to the N-terminus of SetDB1 and does not require its catalytic SET domain [153].
Another mode of interaction between the two systems involves the non-canonical activities of their components. As mentioned earlier, SetDB1 binding sites on mESC chromosomes are heterogeneous, with some regions containing H3K9 methylation and others lacking it. In regions without H3K9me3, SetDB1 may associate with PRC2 and H3K27 methylation, and SetDB1 removal impairs EZH2 binding and reduces H3K27me3 levels [28].
On human and mouse chromosomes, sites containing CBX7/Cbx7 have been identified in the absence of both H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 [69,145,154]. This suggests an alternative mechanism for CBX7/Cbx7 recruitment that does not require histone methylation. SetDB1 may participate in this process, as it has been found among CBX7 binding partners [69]. Moreover, interaction with SetDB1 requires a functional chromodomain of CBX7 [136], and two methylated lysines in SetDB1 (K1170 and K1178) bind CBX7 in vitro with even greater affinity than H3K27me3 [155,156] (Figure 2h).

8. Noncatalytic Functions of SetDB1

The number of studies identifying functions of SetDB1 that do not require its methyltransferase activity is gradually increasing. For example, MET-2 in C. elegans can inactivate its targets through both catalytic and non-catalytic mechanisms [157]. In mice, three SetDB1 transcripts with different lengths and expression profiles have been characterized. The shortest transcript produces a protein lacking the MBD, pre-SET, SET, and post-SET domains [158]. The full-length SetDB1 forms a complex with deacetylases HDAC1 or HDAC2 and transcription corepressors Sin3A or Sin3B, which inhibits the activity of a reporter gene. The short isoform of SetDB1 contains only Tudor domains but is still capable of forming such a complex, retaining its inactivating ability, which in this case depends on HDAC1/2 and Sin3A/3B. This property is also not lost in SetDB1 mutants with a key amino acid substitution in the SET domain or lacking this domain entirely [159].
For the enzymatic function of SetDB1, ubiquitination of a conserved lysine in the SET domain (K884 in mice, Figure 1) is necessary; substitution of this lysine with alanine abolishes SetDB1’s methyltransferase activity. In preadipocytes, this mutant protein binds its targets, but some genes (e.g., Tril and Gas6) lose H3K9me3 and become activated, while others (e.g., Cebpa and Pparg) retain H3K9me3 and remain inactive. In the latter case, methylation is carried out by Suv39h1/h2, which bind these genes together with SetDB1 [34]. Given that the complete removal of SetDB1 leads to activation of Cebpa and Pparg [89], the presence of SetDB1 itself, even if catalytically inactive, appears important for forming the methylating complex with Suv39h1/2. The opposite situation can be observed in human centromeres, where SetDB1 and SUV39H1/2 are primarily responsible for H3K9 methylation. However, if these enzymes are removed, methylation is performed by the G9a/GLP complex. Notably, the presence of even catalytically inactive SetDB1 blocks the binding of G9a/GLP to centromeres and prevents H3K9 methylation there. This reveals a catalytic-independent role of SetDB1 in safeguarding centromere identity by restricting G9a/GLP-mediated methylation and preventing aberrant chromatin expansion [160].
SetDB1 modulates the degradation of the key transcriptional regulator Rb. Through KAP1 activity, Rb is ubiquitinated at lysine K810 and subsequently degraded. This same residue can be methylated; SetDB1 binds to K810me via its Tudor domains, preventing Rb ubiquitination and degradation. In this case, SetDB1 does not methylate Rb but merely interacts with K810me independently of the SET domain [161].
The cytoplasmic fraction of SetDB1 exhibits non-catalytic functions as well. In Drosophila, SetDB1 colocalizes with spindle microtubules (MTs). Both deletion and overexpression of SetDB1 affect MT dynamics, with overexpression of either the wild-type or catalytically inactive mutant equally altering MT polymerization rates [162]. α-Tubulin, which forms MTs, can be modified by acetylation or deacetylation at lysine K40, the latter catalyzed by the deacetylase HDAC6 [163]. Although the biological role of this modification is not fully understood, it may influence MT stability and polymerization [164]. SetDB1 interacts with HDAC6, and deletion of SetDB1 increases tubulin acetylation levels in MTs. Thus, SetDB1’s influence on MT dynamics appears to be mediated by HDAC6 rather than its enzymatic activity [162].
In mammalian mitosis, the SetDB1 paralog SetDB2 is involved in chromosome segregation [9]. SetDB2 mutants exhibit increased abnormal spindle and chromosome segregation phenotypes, which are rescued by expression of either wild-type SetDB2 or a catalytically inactive mutant [165]. In the mammalian liver, SetDB2, together with the glucocorticoid receptor, activates a subset of genes in response to fasting, facilitating long-range enhancer–promoter interactions independently of its enzymatic activity [166].

9. SetDB1 and Nuclear Architecture

The interphase nucleus represents a hierarchical system of domains, ranging from large chromosomal territories to loops connecting the promoter of an individual gene with its enhancer. At the sub-megabase level, this hierarchy includes Topologically Associating Domains (TADs)—extended regions of self-interacting chromatin that are spatially insulated from neighboring TADs by well-defined boundaries. In the nuclei of mouse and human neurons, the configuration of some individual TADs depends on SetDB1, and its deletion or overexpression alters TAD configuration [167,168].
Multisubunit complexes containing Cohesin and insulator proteins play a key role in organizing both individual loops and entire TADs [169,170]. Experiments in mammals have shown that SetDB1 can interact with these complexes and, consequently, regulate the spatial organization of chromatin. In mESC chromosomes, regions were identified where the SetDB1/ATF7IP complex colocalizes with Cohesin. These regions are characterized by the presence of active and the absence of repressive epigenetic marks, including H3K9me3. Moreover, the binding of Cohesin and SetDB1/ATF7IP to these sites is interdependent and does not require the methyltransferase activity of SetDB1. Deletion of SetDB1 or ATF7IP alters chromatin topology in these regions and the expression of nearby genes [171].
SetDB1-mediated H3K9me3 competes with the insulator protein CTCF for binding to a subset of SINE elements in mouse chromosomes. In the absence of SetDB1 and H3K9me3 in these regions, CTCF occupancy significantly increases. Although higher-order chromatin structures, including TADs, remain intact, chromatin loops and local interactions are disrupted, leading to transcriptional changes [172,173,174]. In human lung carcinoma cells, loss-of-function mutation of SetDB1 does not alter the boundaries of most TADs. However, in specific loci where H3K9 methylation disappears, CTCF enrichment occurs, and large TADs split into smaller ones, altering the activity of genes within them [175].
In Drosophila, interphase chromosomes contain inactive TADs, separated by short boundaries or longer transcriptionally active inter-TADs. Each of these structures is associated with a specific set of histone modifications, such as H3K27me3 found in TADs [176]. Comparison of the SetDB1 profile in salivary gland chromosomes with the distribution of domains enriched in H3K27me3 revealed that SetDB1 is often located precisely at the boundaries of these domains [29]. However, the extent to which these boundaries depend on SetDB1 remains an open question.
In mammals, SetDB1 is a component of PML nuclear bodies (PML-NBs), which are involved in various intranuclear processes, although their function is not fully understood. PML-NBs may be regions of the nucleus where protein modification or storage/sequestration occurs, or they may regulate the binding of proteins to specific chromatin regions [177]. SetDB1 is a key component required for the formation of these bodies, alongside the protein PML (also known as TRIM19) [24,178]. Moreover, for the binding of SetDB1 to PML-NBs, a functional SUMO-interacting motif is necessary, but catalytic activity may not be required, as a variant lacking part of the pre-SET domain has been identified in PML-NBs alongside full-length SetDB1 [24].

10. Conclusions

SetDB1 has been identified in various model organisms and has been the subject of hundreds of studies, only a small fraction of which are mentioned in this review. Interest in SetDB1 is driven by its involvement in numerous vital processes and, in humans, by a strong association between SetDB1 dysregulation and poor tumor prognosis [20,21]. Therefore, the search for ways to control the activity of the SetDB1 gene or SetDB1 protein represents a highly promising direction in anti-tumor therapy. This, in turn, necessitates the identification of factors that regulate SetDB1 gene transcription, protein activity, as well as its partners and targets.
We have demonstrated that the functions of SetDB1 are diverse and not always directly linked to its methyltransferase activity. Therefore, attributing the effects of SetDB1 mutation or knockdown solely to changes in histone methylation patterns and transcription of its direct targets would be an oversimplification. When interpreting experimental results, it is important to keep in mind the potential influence of SetDB1 on other proteins and cellular systems. Furthermore, it is essential to consider the various mechanisms through which SetDB1 can affect specific processes, as illustrated by p53, where SetDB1 regulates both gene transcription and protein stability.
An area that has been scarcely covered in this review but is no less intriguing is the modification of SetDB1 itself. To date, only a handful of these modifications have been characterized in detail. However, according to the PhosphoSitePlus database [36], dozens of SetDB1 modifications have been identified, most of which lack information regarding the enzymes responsible for their establishment, the proteins that recognize them, and their influence on SetDB1’s activity or stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.E.R. and D.E.K.; writing—review and editing, S.E.R. and D.E.K.; visualization, D.E.K.; supervision, S.E.R.; funding acquisition, S.E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (25-74-00006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable. No new data were created or analysed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Harte, P.J.; Wu, W.; Carrasquillo, M.M.; Matera, A.G. Assignment of a novel bifurcated SET domain gene, SETDB1, to human chromosome band 1q21 by in situ hybridization and radiation hybrids. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1999, 84, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schultz, D.C.; Ayyanathan, K.; Negorev, D.; Maul, G.G.; Rauscher, F.J., 3rd. SETDB1: A novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, L.; Xia, L.; Wu, D.Y.; Wang, H.; Chansky, H.A.; Schubach, W.H.; Hickstein, D.D.; Zhang, Y. Molecular cloning of ESET, a novel histone H3-specific methyltransferase that interacts with ERG transcription factor. Oncogene 2002, 21, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poulin, G.; Dong, Y.; Fraser, A.G.; Hopper, N.A.; Ahringer, J. Chromatin regulation and sumoylation in the inhibition of Ras-induced vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 2613–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Andersen, E.C.; Horvitz, H.R. Two C. elegans histone methyltransferases repress lin-3 EGF transcription to inhibit vulval development. Development 2007, 134, 2991–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stabell, M.; Bjørkmo, M.; Aalen, R.B.; Lambertsson, A. The Drosophila SET domain encoding gene dEset is essential for proper development. Hereditas 2006, 143, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Clough, E.; Moon, W.; Wang, S.; Smith, K.; Hazelrigg, T. Histone methylation is required for oogenesis in Drosophila. Development 2007, 134, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mabuchi, H.; Fujii, H.; Calin, G.; Alder, H.; Negrini, M.; Rassenti, L.; Kipps, T.J.; Bullrich, F.; Croce, C.M. Cloning and characterization of CLLD6, CLLD7, and CLLD8, novel candidate genes for leukemogenesis at chromosome 13q14, a region commonly deleted in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2870–2877. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Falandry, C.; Fourel, G.; Galy, V.; Ristriani, T.; Horard, B.; Bensimon, E.; Salles, G.; Gilson, E.; Magdinier, F. CLLD8/KMT1F is a lysine methyltransferase that is important for chromosome segregation. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 20234–20241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Torrano, J.; Al Emran, A.; Hammerlindl, H.; Schaider, H. Emerging roles of H3K9me3, SETDB1 and SETDB2 in therapy-induced cellular reprogramming. Clin. Epigenetics 2019, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Clough, E.; Tedeschi, T.; Hazelrigg, T. Epigenetic regulation of oogenesis and germ stem cell maintenance by the Drosophila histone methyltransferase Eggless/dSetDB1. Dev. Biol. 2014, 388, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Romanov, S.E.; Shloma, V.V.; Maksimov, D.A.; Koryakov, D.E. SetDB1 and Su(var)3-9 are essential for late stages of larval development of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosome Res. 2023, 31, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, X.; Shi, Z.; Cui, M.; Han, M.; Ruvkun, G. Repression of germline RNAi pathways in somatic cells by retinoblastoma pathway chromatin complexes. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dodge, J.E.; Kang, Y.-K.; Beppu, H.; Lei, H.; Li, E. Histone H3-K9 methyltransferase ESET is essential for early development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 2478–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Eymery, A.; Liu, Z.; Ozonov, E.A.; Stadler, M.B.; Peters, A.H.F.M. The methyltransferase Setdb1 is essential for meiosis and mitosis in mouse oocytes and early embryos. Development 2016, 143, 2767–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hirota, T.; Blakeley, P.; Sangrithi, M.N.; Mahadevaiah, S.K.; Encheva, V.; Snijders, A.P.; ElInati, E.; Ojarikre, O.A.; de Rooij, D.G.; Niakan, K.K.; et al. SETDB1 links the meiotic DNA damage response to sex chromosome silencing in mice. Dev. Cell 2018, 47, 645–659.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cheng, E.-C.; Hsieh, C.-L.; Liu, N.; Wang, J.; Zhong, M.; Chen, T.; Li, E.; Lin, H. The essential function of SETDB1 in homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis during meiosis. Cell Rep. 2021, 34, 108575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yahiro, K.; Higashihori, N.; Moriyama, K. Histone methyltransferase Setdb1 is indispensable for Meckel’s cartilage development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 482, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kazerani, M.; Cernilogar, F.; Pasquarella, A.; Hinterberger, M.; Nuber, A.; Klein, L.; Schotta, G. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 safeguards mouse fetal hematopoiesis by suppressing activation of cryptic enhancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2409656121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lazaro-Camp, V.J.; Salari, R.; Meng, X.; Yang, S. SETDB1 in cancer: Overexpression and its therapeutic implications. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 1803–1827. [Google Scholar]
  21. Prashanth, S.; Maniswami, R.R.; Rajajeyabalachandran, G.; Jegatheesan, S.K. SETDB1, an H3K9-specific methyltransferase: An attractive epigenetic target to combat cancer. Drug Discov. Today 2024, 29, 103982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Loyola, A.; Tagami, H.; Bonaldi, T.; Roche, D.; Quivy, J.P.; Imhof, A.; Nakatani, Y.; Dent, S.Y.R.; Almouzni, G. The HP1alpha-CAF1-SetDB1-containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39-mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Towbin, B.D.; González-Aguilera, C.; Sack, R.; Gaidatzis, D.; Kalck, V.; Meister, P.; Askjaer, P.; Gasser, S.M. Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. Cell 2012, 150, 934–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cho, S.; Park, J.S.; Kang, Y.-K. Regulated nuclear entry of over-expressed Setdb1. Genes Cells 2013, 18, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tachibana, K.; Gotoh, E.; Kawamata, N.; Ishimoto, K.; Uchihara, Y.; Iwanari, H.; Sugiyama, A.; Kawamura, T.; Mochizuki, Y.; Tanaka, T.; et al. Analysis of the subcellular localization of the human histone methyltransferase SETDB1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 465, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beyer, S.; Pontis, J.; Schirwis, E.; Battisti, V.; Rudolf, A.; Le Grand, F.; Ait-Si-Ali, S. Canonical Wnt signalling regulates nuclear export of Setdb1 during skeletal muscle terminal differentiation. Cell Discov. 2016, 2, 16037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eom, J.; Jeon, K.; Park, J.S.; Kang, Y.-K. Functional dissection of N-terminal nuclear trafficking signals of SETDB1. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 1069765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fei, Q.; Yang, X.; Jiang, H.; Wang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Yi, W.; Zhou, S.; Chen, T.; Lu, C.; et al. SETDB1 modulates PRC2 activity at developmental genes independently of H3K9 trimethylation in mouse ES cells. Genome Res. 2015, 25, 1325–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kalashnikova, D.A.; Maksimov, D.A.; Romanov, S.E.; Laktionov, P.P.; Koryakov, D.E. SetDB1 and Su(var)3-9 play non-overlapping roles in somatic cell chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Sci. 2021, 134, jcs253096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Osumi, K.; Sato, K.; Murano, K.; Siomi, H.; Siomi, M.C. Essential roles of Windei and nuclear monoubiquitination of Eggless/SETDB1 in transposon silencing. EMBO Rep. 2019, 20, e48296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ivanov, A.V.; Peng, H.; Yurchenko, V.; Yap, K.L.; Negorev, D.G.; Schultz, D.C.; Psulkowski, E.; Fredericks, W.J.; White, D.E.; Maul, G.G.; et al. PHD domain-mediated E3 ligase activity directs intramolecular sumoylation of an adjacent bromodomain required for gene silencing. Mol. Cell 2007, 28, 823–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jurkowska, R.Z.; Qin, S.; Kungulovski, G.; Tempel, W.; Liu, Y.; Bashtrykov, P.; Stiefelmaier, J.; Jurkowski, T.P.; Kudithipudi, S.; Weirich, S.; et al. H3K14ac is linked to methylation of H3K9 by the triple Tudor domain of SETDB1. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ishimoto, K.; Kawamata, N.; Uchihara, Y.; Okubo, M.; Fujimoto, R.; Gotoh, E.; Kakinouchi, K.; Mizohata, E.; Hino, N.; Okada, Y.; et al. Ubiquitination of lysine 867 of the human SETDB1 protein upregulates its histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methyltransferase activity. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, J.; Matsumura, Y.; Kano, Y.; Yoshida, A.; Kawamura, T.; Hirakawa, H.; Inagaki, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kimura, H.; Yanagi, S.; et al. Ubiquitination-dependent and -independent repression of target genes by SETDB1 reveal a context-dependent role for its methyltransferase activity during adipogenesis. Genes Cells 2021, 26, 513–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, Q.; Cao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Fan, Q.; Huang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, X.; Ma, J.; et al. Senp2 regulates adipose lipid storage by de-SUMOylation of Setdb1. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 10, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hornbeck, P.V.; Zhang, B.; Murray, B.; Kornhauser, J.M.; Latham, V.; Skrzypek, E. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: Mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D512–D520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rivera, C.; Saavedra, F.; Alvarez, F.; Díaz-Celis, C.; Ugalde, V.; Li, J.; Forné, I.; Gurard-Levin, Z.A.; Almouzni, G.; Imhof, A.; et al. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 occurs during translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 9097–9106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Koch, C.M.; Honemann-Capito, M.; Egger-Adam, D.; Wodarz, A. Windei, the Drosophila homolog of mAM/MCAF1, is an essential cofactor of the H3K9 methyl transferase dSETDB1/Eggless in germ line development. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mutlu, B.; Chen, H.-M.; Moresco, J.J.; Orelo, B.D.; Yang, B.; Gaspar, J.M.; Keppler-Ross, S.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Hall, D.H.; Maine, E.M.; et al. Regulated nuclear accumulation of a histone methyltransferase times the onset of heterochromatin formation in C. elegans embryos. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Delaney, C.E.; Methot, S.P.; Guidi, M.; Katic, I.; Gasser, S.M.; Padeken, J. Heterochromatic foci and transcriptional repression by an unstructured MET-2/SETDB1 co-factor LIN-65. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 820–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tsusaka, T.; Shimura, C.; Shinkai, Y. ATF7IP regulates SETDB1 nuclear localization and increases its ubiquitination. EMBO Rep. 2019, 20, e48297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, H.; An, W.; Cao, R.; Xia, L.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Chatton, B.; Tempst, P.; Roeder, R.G.; Zhang, Y. mAM facilitates conversion by ESET of dimethyl to trimethyl lysine 9 of histone H3 to cause transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell 2003, 12, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Timms, R.T.; Tchasovnikarova, I.A.; Antrobus, R.; Dougan, G.; Lehner, P.J. ATF7IP-mediated stabilization of the histone methyltransferase SETDB1 is essential for heterochromatin formation by the HUSH complex. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sun, L.; Fang, J. E3-independent constitutive monoubiquitination complements histone methyltransferase activity of SETDB1. Mol. Cell 2016, 62, 958–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kariapper, L.; Marathe, I.A.; Niesman, A.B.; Suino-Powell, K.; Chook, Y.M.; Wysocki, V.H.; Worden, E.J. Setdb1 and Atf7IP form a hetero-trimeric complex that blocks Setdb1 nuclear export. J. Biol. Chem. 2025, 301, 110171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shang, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, L.; Wang, G.; Zhou, X.; Wang, P.; Gao, J.; et al. ATF7IP2, a meiosis-specific partner of SETDB1, is required for proper chromosome remodeling and crossover formation during spermatogenesis. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alavattam, K.G.; Esparza, J.M.; Hu, M.; Shimada, R.; Kohrs, A.R.; Abe, H.; Munakata, Y.; Otsuka, K.; Yoshimura, S.; Kitamura, Y.; et al. ATF7IP2/MCAF2 directs H3K9 methylation and meiotic gene regulation in the male germline. Genes Dev. 2024, 38, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Matsui, T.; Leung, D.; Miyashita, H.; Maksakova, I.A.; Miyachi, H.; Kimura, H.; Tachibana, M.; Lorincz, M.C.; Shinkai, Y. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature 2010, 464, 927–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Karimi, M.M.; Goyal, P.; Maksakova, I.A.; Bilenky, M.; Leung, D.; Tang, J.X.; Shinkai, Y.; Mager, D.L.; Jones, S.; Hirst, M.; et al. DNA methylation and SETDB1/H3K9me3 regulate predominantly distinct sets of genes, retroelements, and chimeric transcripts in mESCs. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rowe, H.M.; Friedli, M.; Offner, S.; Verp, S.; Mesnard, D.; Marquis, J.; Aktas, T.; Trono, D. De novo DNA methylation of endogenous retroviruses is shaped by KRAB-ZFPs/KAP1 and ESET. Development 2013, 140, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tan, S.-L.; Nishi, M.; Ohtsuka, T.; Matsui, T.; Takemoto, K.; Kamio-Miura, A.; Aburatani, H.; Shinkai, Y.; Kageyama, R. Essential roles of the histone methyltransferase ESET in the epigenetic control of neural progenitor cells during development. Development 2012, 139, 3806–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Collins, P.L.; Kyle, K.E.; Egawa, T.; Shinkai, Y.; Oltz, E.M. The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 represses endogenous and exogenous retroviruses in B lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8367–8372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Takikita, S.; Muro, R.; Takai, T.; Otsubo, T.; Kawamura, Y.I.; Dohi, T.; Oda, H.; Kitajima, M.; Oshima, K.; Hattori, M.; et al. A histone methyltransferase ESET is critical for T cell development. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 2269–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kato, M.; Takemoto, K.; Shinkai, Y. A somatic role for the histone methyltransferase Setdb1 in endogenous retrovirus silencing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wolf, G.; Yang, P.; Füchtbauer, A.C.; Füchtbauer, E.-M.; Silva, A.M.; Park, C.; Wu, W.; Nielsen, A.L.; Pedersen, F.S.; Macfarlan, T.S. The KRAB zinc finger protein ZFP809 is required to initiate epigenetic silencing of endogenous retroviruses. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 538–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, Q.; Fang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, P. Unraveling the role of ZNF506 as a human PBS-pro-targeting protein for ERVP repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, 10309–10325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Godneeva, B.; Ninova, M.; Fejes-Toth, K.; Aravin, A. SUMOylation of Bonus, the Drosophila homolog of Transcription Intermediary Factor 1, safeguards germline identity by recruiting repressive chromatin complexes to silence tissue-specific genes. eLife 2023, 12, RP89493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tchasovnikarova, I.A.; Timms, R.T.; Matheson, N.J.; Wals, K.; Antrobus, R.; Göttgens, B.; Dougan, G.; Dawson, M.A.; Lehner, P.J. Epigenetic silencing by the HUSH complex mediates position-effect variegation in human cells. Science 2015, 348, 1481–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Müller, I.; Helin, K. Keep quiet: The HUSH complex in transcriptional silencing and disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2024, 31, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kokura, K.; Sun, L.; Bedford, M.T.; Fang, J. Methyl-H3K9-binding protein MPP8 mediates E-cadherin gene silencing and promotes tumour cell motility and invasion. EMBO J. 2010, 29, 3673–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chang, Y.; Horton, J.R.; Bedford, M.T.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, X. Structural insights for MPP8 chromodomain interaction with histone H3 lysine 9: Potential effect of phosphorylation on methyl-lysine binding. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 408, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Tsusaka, T.; Kikuchi, M.; Shimazu, T.; Suzuki, T.; Sohtome, Y.; Akakabe, M.; Sodeoka, M.; Dohmae, N.; Umehara, T.; Shinkai, Y. Tri-methylation of ATF7IP by G9a/GLP recruits the chromodomain protein MPP8. Epigenetics Chromatin 2018, 11, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nikolopoulos, N.; Oda, S.-I.; Prigozhin, D.M.; Modis, Y. Structure and methyl-lysine binding selectivity of the HUSH complex subunit MPP8. J. Mol. Biol. 2025, 437, 168890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cruz-Tapias, P.; Robin, P.; Pontis, J.; Del Maestro, L.; Ait-Si-Ali, S. The H3K9 methylation writer SETDB1 and its reader MPP8 cooperate to silence satellite DNA repeats in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes 2019, 10, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Müller, I.; Moroni, A.S.; Shlyueva, D.; Sahadevan, S.; Schoof, E.M.; Radzisheuskaya, A.; Højfeldt, J.W.; Tatar, T.; Koche, R.P.; Huang, C.; et al. MPP8 is essential for sustaining self-renewal of ground-state pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bilodeau, S.; Kagey, M.H.; Frampton, G.M.; Rahl, P.B.; Young, R.A. SetDB1 contributes to repression of genes encoding developmental regulators and maintenance of ES cell state. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 2484–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yuan, P.; Han, J.; Guo, G.; Orlov, Y.L.; Huss, M.; Loh, Y.-H.; Yaw, L.-P.; Robson, P.; Lim, B.; Ng, H.-H. Eset partners with Oct4 to restrict extraembryonic trophoblast lineage potential in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 2507–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Koide, S.; Oshima, M.; Takubo, K.; Yamazaki, S.; Nitta, E.; Saraya, A.; Aoyama, K.; Kato, Y.; Miyagi, S.; Nakajima-Takagi, Y.; et al. Setdb1 maintains hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by restricting the ectopic activation of nonhematopoietic genes. Blood 2016, 128, 638–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jung, J.; Buisman, S.C.; Weersing, E.; Dethmers-Ausema, A.; Zwart, E.; Schepers, H.; Dekker, M.R.; Lazare, S.S.; Hammerl, F.; Skokova, Y.; et al. CBX7 Induces self-renewal of human normal and malignant hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by canonical and non-canonical interactions. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 1906–1918.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nicetto, D.; Donahue, G.; Jain, T.; Peng, T.; Sidoli, S.; Sheng, L.; Montavon, T.; Becker, J.S.; Grindheim, J.M.; Blahnik, K.; et al. H3K9me3-heterochromatin loss at protein-coding genes enables developmental lineage specification. Science 2019, 363, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wu, K.; Liu, P.; Wang, H.; He, J.; Xu, S.; Chen, Y.; Kuang, J.; Liu, J.; Guo, L.; Li, D.; et al. SETDB1-mediated cell fate transition between 2C-like and pluripotent states. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 25–36.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Frietze, S.; O’Geen, H.; Blahnik, K.R.; Jin, V.X.; Farnham, P.J. ZNF274 recruits the histone methyltransferase SETDB1 to the 3′ ends of ZNF genes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Stielow, B.; Sapetschnig, A.; Wink, C.; Krüger, I.; Suske, G. SUMO-modified Sp3 represses transcription by provoking local heterochromatic gene silencing. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xiao, X.; Shi, X.; Fan, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, X.; Minze, L.; Liu, W.; Ghobrial, R.M.; Lan, P.; Li, X.C. The costimulatory receptor OX40 inhibits interleukin-17 expression through activation of repressive chromatin remodeling pathways. Immunity 2016, 44, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wakabayashi, Y.; Tamiya, T.; Takada, I.; Fukaya, T.; Sugiyama, Y.; Inoue, N.; Kimura, A.; Morita, R.; Kashiwagi, I.; Takimoto, T.; et al. Histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methyltransferase recruitment to the interleukin-2 (IL-2) promoter is a mechanism of suppression of IL-2 transcription by the transforming growth factor-β-Smad pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 35456–35465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sun, X.; Zhang, T.; Tong, B.; Cheng, L.; Jiang, W.; Sun, Y. POGZ suppresses 2C transcriptional program and retrotransposable elements. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Li, F.; Zhang, T.; Syed, A.; Elbakry, A.; Holmer, N.; Nguyen, H.; Mukkavalli, S.; Greenberg, R.A.; D’Andrea, A.D. CHAMP1 complex directs heterochromatin assembly and promotes homology-directed DNA repair. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mysliwiec, M.R.; Carlson, C.D.; Tietjen, J.; Hung, H.; Ansari, A.Z.; Lee, Y. Jarid2 (Jumonji, AT rich interactive domain 2) regulates NOTCH1 expression via histone modification in the developing heart. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, S.-M.; Cai, W.L.; Liu, X.; Thakral, D.; Luo, J.; Chan, L.H.; McGeary, M.K.; Song, E.; Blenman, K.R.M.; Micevic, G.; et al. KDM5B promotes immune evasion by recruiting SETDB1 to silence retroelements. Nature 2021, 598, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Klose, R.J.; Kallin, E.M.; Zhang, Y. JmjC-domain-containing proteins and histone demethylation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sun, L.; Ma, K.; Zhang, S.; Gu, J.; Wang, H.; Tan, L. SENP2 promotes ESCC proliferation through SETDB1 deSUMOylation and enhanced fatty acid metabolism. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Du, L.; Liu, W.; Rosen, S.T.; Chen, Y. Mechanism of SUMOylation-mediated regulation of type I IFN expression. J. Mol. Biol. 2023, 435, 167968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cui, X.; Shang, X.; Xie, J.; Xie, C.; Tang, Z.; Luo, Q.; Wu, C.; Wang, G.; Wang, N.; He, K.; et al. Cooperation between IRTKS and deubiquitinase OTUD4 enhances the SETDB1-mediated H3K9 trimethylation that promotes tumor metastasis via suppressing E-cadherin expression. Cancer Lett. 2023, 575, 216404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Koryakov, D.E. Diversity and functional specialization of H3K9-specific histone methyltransferases. Bioessays 2024, 46, e2300163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ozata, D.M.; Gainetdinov, I.; Zoch, A.; O’Carroll, D.; Zamore, P.D. PIWI-interacting RNAs: Small RNAs with big functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 89–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Rangan, P.; Malone, C.D.; Navarro, C.; Newbold, S.P.; Hayes, P.S.; Sachidanandam, R.; Hannon, G.J.; Lehmann, R. piRNA production requires heterochromatin formation in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 1373–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Maksimov, D.A.; Koryakov, D.E. Binding of SU(VAR)3-9 partially depends on SETDB1 in the chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Cells 2019, 8, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bernstein, E.; Duncan, E.M.; Masui, O.; Gil, J.; Heard, E.; Allis, C.D. Mouse polycomb proteins bind differentially to methylated histone H3 and RNA and are enriched in facultative heterochromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 2560–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Matsumura, Y.; Nakaki, R.; Inagaki, T.; Yoshida, A.; Kano, Y.; Kimura, H.; Tanaka, T.; Tsutsumi, S.; Nakao, M.; Doi, T.; et al. H3K4/H3K9me3 bivalent chromatin domains targeted by lineage-specific DNA methylation pauses adipocyte differentiation. Mol. Cell 2015, 60, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Price, A.J.; Manjegowda, M.C.; Kain, J.; Anandh, S.; Bochkis, I.M. Hdac3, Setdb1, and Kap1 mark H3K9me3/H3K14ac bivalent regions in young and aged liver. Aging Cell 2020, 19, e13092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Barral, A.; Pozo, G.; Ducrot, L.; Papadopoulos, G.L.; Sauzet, S.; Oldfield, A.J.; Cavalli, G.; Déjardin, J. SETDB1/NSD-dependent H3K9me3/H3K36me3 dual heterochromatin maintains gene expression profiles by bookmarking poised enhancers. Mol. Cell 2022, 82, 816–832.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Blahnik, K.R.; Dou, L.; Echipare, L.; Iyengar, S.; O’Geen, H.; Sanchez, E.; Zhao, Y.; Marra, M.A.; Hirst, M.; Costello, J.F.; et al. Characterization of the contradictory chromatin signatures at the 3′ exons of zinc finger genes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gauchier, M.; Kan, S.; Barral, A.; Sauzet, S.; Agirre, E.; Bonnell, E.; Saksouk, N.; Barth, T.K.; Ide, S.; Urbach, S.; et al. SETDB1-dependent heterochromatin stimulates alternative lengthening of telomeres. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mauser, R.; Kungulovski, G.; Keup, C.; Reinhardt, R.; Jeltsch, A. Application of dual reading domains as novel reagents in chromatin biology reveals a new H3K9me3 and H3K36me2/3 bivalent chromatin state. Epigenetics Chromatin 2017, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chandrasekaran, T.T.; Choudalakis, M.; Bröhm, A.; Weirich, S.; Kouroukli, A.G.; Ammerpohl, O.; Rathert, P.; Bashtrykov, P.; Jeltsch, A. SETDB1 activity is globally directed by H3K14 acetylation via its Triple Tudor Domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, 13690–13705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Tang, R.; Zhou, M.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Fan, X.; Zhang, J.; Dong, A.; Lv, L.; Mao, S.; Chen, F.; et al. H3K14ac facilitates the reinstallation of constitutive heterochromatin in Drosophila early embryos by engaging Eggless/SetDB1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2321859121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tang, Q.; Zhang, A.; Sullivan, M.; Fejes Toth, K.; Aravin, A.A. Auto-methylation of the histone methyltransferase SetDB1 at its histone-mimic motifs ensures the spreading and maintenance of heterochromatin. bioRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gottlieb, T.M.; Martinez Leal, J.F.; Seger, R.; Taya, Y.; Oren, M. Cross-talk between Akt, p53 and Mdm2: Possible implications for the regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene 2002, 21, 1299–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fei, Q.; Shang, K.; Zhang, J.; Chuai, S.; Kong, D.; Zhou, T.; Fu, S.; Liang, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, Z.; et al. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 regulates liver cancer cell growth through methylation of p53. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ogawa, S.; Fukuda, A.; Matsumoto, Y.; Hanyu, Y.; Sono, M.; Fukunaga, Y.; Masuda, T.; Araki, O.; Nagao, M.; Yoshikawa, T.; et al. SETDB1 inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis and is required for formation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in mice. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 682–696.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Guo, J.; Dai, X.; Laurent, B.; Zheng, N.; Gan, W.; Zhang, J.; Guo, A.; Yuan, M.; Liu, P.; Asara, J.M.; et al. AKT methylation by SETDB1 promotes AKT kinase activity and oncogenic functions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, G.; Long, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Han, F.; Xu, C.; Sun, L.; Yang, S.-C.; Lan, J.; Hou, Z.; et al. SETDB1-mediated methylation of Akt promotes its K63-linked ubiquitination and activation leading to tumorigenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Elzakra, N.; Kim, Y. HIF-1α metabolic pathways in human cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1280, 243–260. [Google Scholar]
  104. Yang, Y.; Bai, J.; Shen, R.; Brown, S.A.N.; Komissarova, E.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, N.; Alberts, G.F.; Costa, M.; Lu, L.; et al. Polo-like kinase 3 functions as a tumor suppressor and is a negative regulator of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α under hypoxic conditions. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 4077–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Luo, F.; Zhang, M.; Sun, B.; Xu, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, G.; Chen, C.; Li, Y.; et al. LINC00115 promotes chemoresistant breast cancer stem-like cell stemness and metastasis through SETDB1/PLK3/HIF1α signaling. Mol. Cancer 2024, 23, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shi, M.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Tian, K.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, K.; Chen, Z.; Chen, R. SETDB1-mediated CD147-K71 di-methylation promotes cell apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Genes Dis. 2024, 11, 978–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. She, X.; Wu, Q.; Rao, Z.; Song, D.; Huang, C.; Feng, S.; Liu, A.; Liu, L.; Wan, K.; Li, X.; et al. SETDB1 Methylates MCT1 promoting tumor progression by enhancing the lactate shuttle. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2301871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Pan, Q.; Luo, P.; Qiu, Y.; Hu, K.; Lin, L.; Zhang, H.; Yin, D.; Shi, C. The SETDB1-PC4-UPF1 post-transcriptional machinery controls periodic degradation of CENPF mRNA and maintains mitotic progression. Cell Death Differ. 2025, 32, 1413–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sanij, E.; Hannan, S.D. The role of UBF in regulating the structure and dynamics of transcriptionally active rDNA chromatin. Epigenetics 2009, 4, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hwang, Y.J.; Han, D.; Kim, K.Y.; Min, S.-J.; Kowall, N.W.; Yang, L.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.; Ryu, H. ESET methylates UBF at K232/254 and regulates nucleolar heterochromatin plasticity and rDNA transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 1628–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Binda, O.; LeRoy, G.; Bua, D.J.; Garcia, B.A.; Gozani, O.; Richard, S. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 impairs methylation of histone H3 lysine 9: Regulation of lysine methyltransferases by physical interaction with their substrates. Epigenetics 2010, 5, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. van Duyne, R.; Easley, R.; Wu, W.; Berro, R.; Pedati, C.; Klase, Z.; Kehn-Hall, K.; Flynn, E.K.; Symer, D.E.; Kashanchi, F. Lysine methylation of HIV-1 Tat regulates transcriptional activity of the viral LTR. Retrovirology 2008, 5, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Xia, K.; Wang, T.; Chen, Z.; Guo, J.; Yu, B.; Chen, Q.; Qiu, T.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, S. Hepatocellular SETDB1 regulates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury through targeting lysine methylation of ASK1 signal. Research 2023, 6, 0256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Rapone, R.; Del Maestro, L.; Bouyioukos, C.; Albini, S.; Cruz-Tapias, P.; Joliot, V.; Cosson, B.; Ait-Si-Ali, S. The cytoplasmic fraction of the histone lysine methyltransferase Setdb1 is essential for embryonic stem cells. iScience 2023, 26, 107386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Han, C.; Wang, P.; Ye, J.; Wang, R.; Shi, X.; Hu, G.; Hu, X.; Shen, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.; et al. Estrogen increases Setdb1 cytoplasmic localization to stabilize Serpinh1 and improve protein homeostasis in osteoblasts. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2025, 605, 112568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ferry, L.; Fournier, A.; Tsusaka, T.; Adelmant, G.; Shimazu, T.; Matano, S.; Kirsh, O.; Amouroux, R.; Dohmae, N.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Methylation of DNA Ligase 1 by G9a/GLP recruits UHRF1 to replicating DNA and regulates DNA methylation. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 550–565.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D609–D617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ichimura, T.; Watanabe, S.; Sakamoto, Y.; Aoto, T.; Fujita, N.; Nakao, M. Transcriptional repression and heterochromatin formation by MBD1 and MCAF/AM family proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 13928–13935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Uchimura, Y.; Ichimura, T.; Uwada, J.; Tachibana, T.; Sugahara, S.; Nakao, M.; Saitoh, H. Involvement of SUMO modification in MBD1- and MCAF1-mediated heterochromatin formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 23180–23190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Minkovsky, A.; Sahakyan, A.; Rankin-Gee, E.; Bonora, G.; Patel, S.; Plath, K. The Mbd1-Atf7ip-Setdb1 pathway contributes to the maintenance of X chromosome inactivation. Epigenetics Chromatin 2014, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, H.; Rauch, T.; Chen, Z.-X.; Szabó, P.E.; Riggs, A.D.; Pfeifer, G.P. The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 and the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A interact directly and localize to promoters silenced in cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 19489–19500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kao, T.-H.; Liao, H.-F.; Wolf, D.; Tai, K.-Y.; Chuang, C.-Y.; Lee, H.-S.; Kuo, H.-C.; Hata, K.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, X.; et al. Ectopic DNMT3L triggers assembly of a repressive complex for retroviral silencing in somatic cells. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 10680–10695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Leung, D.; Du, T.; Wagner, U.; Xie, W.; Lee, A.Y.; Goyal, P.; Li, Y.; Szulwach, K.E.; Jin, P.; Lorincz, M.C.; et al. Regulation of DNA methylation turnover at LTR retrotransposons and imprinted loci by the histone methyltransferase Setdb1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6690–6695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Tatsumi, D.; Hayashi, Y.; Endo, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Kiso, K.; Kanno, S.; Nakai, Y.; Maeda, I.; Mochizuki, K.; et al. DNMTs and SETDB1 function as co-repressors in MAX-mediated repression of germ cell-related genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Dunwell, T.L.; Pfeifer, G.P. Drosophila genomic methylation: New evidence and new questions. Epigenomics 2014, 6, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hu, C.-W.; Chen, J.-L.; Hsu, Y.-W.; Yen, C.-C.; Chao, M.-R. Trace analysis of methylated and hydroxymethylated cytosines in DNA by isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS: First evidence of DNA methylation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem. J. 2015, 465, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Mahana, Y.; Ariyoshi, M.; Nozawa, R.-S.; Shibata, S.; Nagao, K.; Obuse, C.; Shirakawa, M. Structural evidence for protein-protein interaction between the non-canonical methyl-CpG-binding domain of SETDB proteins and C11orf46. Structure 2024, 32, 304–315.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Peter, C.J.; Saito, A.; Hasegawa, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Nagpal, M.; Perez, G.; Alway, E.; Espeso-Gil, S.; Fayyad, T.; Ratner, C.; et al. In vivo epigenetic editing of Sema6a promoter reverses transcallosal dysconnectivity caused by C11orf46/Arl14ep risk gene. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Guruharsha, K.G.; Rual, J.-F.; Zhai, B.; Mintseris, J.; Vaidya, P.; Vaidya, N.; Beekman, C.; Wong, C.; Rhee, D.Y.; Cenaj, O.; et al. A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 2011, 147, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Atinbayeva, N.; Valent, I.; Zenk, F.; Loeser, E.; Rauer, M.; Herur, S.; Quarato, P.; Pyrowolakis, G.; Gomez-Auli, A.; Mittler, G.; et al. Inheritance of H3K9 methylation regulates genome architecture in Drosophila early embryos. EMBO J. 2024, 43, 2685–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Guo, Y.; Mao, X.; Xiong, L.; Xia, A.; You, J.; Lin, G.; Wu, C.; Huang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S. Structure-guided discovery of a potent and selective cell-active inhibitor of SETDB1 Tudor domain. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 8760–8765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Xia, K.; Hui, Y.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, Q.; Zhong, J.; Chen, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, Z. SETDB1 targeting SESN2 regulates mitochondrial damage and oxidative stress in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. BMC Biol. 2024, 22, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Uguen, M.; Deng, Y.; Li, F.; Shell, D.J.; Norris-Drouin, J.L.; Stashko, M.A.; Ackloo, S.; Arrowsmith, C.H.; James, L.I.; Liu, P.; et al. SETDB1 triple Tudor domain ligand, (R, R)-59, promotes methylation of Akt1 in cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 2023, 18, 1846–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Uguen, M.; Shell, D.J.; Silva, M.; Deng, Y.; Li, F.; Szewczyk, M.M.; Yang, K.; Zhao, Y.; Stashko, M.A.; Norris-Drouin, J.L.; et al. Potent and selective SETDB1 covalent negative allosteric modulator reduces methyltransferase activity in cells. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Babu, T.M.C.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, D.; Huang, C. Discovery of potential epigenetic inhibitors against histone methyltransferases through molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. de Groot, A.P.; Nguyen, H.; Pouw, J.S.; Weersing, E.; Dethmers-Ausema, A.; de Haan, G. CBX7 inhibitors affect H3K9 methyltransferase-regulated gene repression in leukemic cells. Exp. Hematol. 2025, 142, 104691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Peng, Z.; Fang, W.; Wu, B.; He, M.; Li, S.; Wei, J.; Hao, Y.; Jin, L.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.; et al. Targeting Smurf1 to block PDK1-Akt signaling in KRAS-mutated colorectal cancer. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2025, 21, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Czermin, B.; Melfi, R.; McCabe, D.; Seitz, V.; Imhof, A.; Pirrotta, V. Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites. Cell 2002, 111, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Müller, J.; Hart, C.M.; Francis, N.J.; Vargas, M.L.; Sengupta, A.; Wild, B.; Miller, E.L.; O’Connor, M.B.; Kingston, R.E.; Simon, J.A. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 2002, 111, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Shao, Z.; Raible, F.; Mollaaghababa, R.; Guyon, J.R.; Wu, C.T.; Bender, W.; Kingston, R.E. Stabilization of chromatin structure by PRC1, a Polycomb complex. Cell 1999, 98, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Min, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, R.-M. Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1823–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Bajusz, I.; Kovács, G.; Pirity, M.K. From flies to mice: The emerging role of non-canonical PRC1 members in mammalian development. Epigenomes 2018, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Geng, Z.; Gao, Z. Mammalian PRC1 complexes: Compositional complexity and diverse molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Gao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Bonasio, R.; Strino, F.; Sawai, A.; Parisi, F.; Kluger, Y.; Reinberg, D. PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes. Mol. Cell 2012, 45, 344–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Morey, L.; Pascual, G.; Cozzuto, L.; Roma, G.; Wutz, A.; Benitah, S.A.; Di Croce, L. Nonoverlapping functions of the Polycomb group Cbx family of proteins in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 10, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Dahlet, T.; Truss, M.; Frede, U.; Al Adhami, H.; Bardet, A.F.; Dumas, M.; Vallet, J.; Chicher, J.; Hammann, P.; Kottnik, S.; et al. E2F6 initiates stable epigenetic silencing of germline genes during embryonic development. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Mochizuki, K.; Sharif, J.; Shirane, K.; Uranishi, K.; Bogutz, A.B.; Janssen, S.M.; Suzuki, A.; Okuda, A.; Koseki, H.; Lorincz, M.C. Repression of germline genes by PRC1.6 and SETDB1 in the early embryo precedes DNA methylation-mediated silencing. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Uranishi, K.; Hirasaki, M.; Nishimoto, M.; Klose, R.J.; Okuda, A.; Suzuki, A. MGA directly recruits SETDB1/ATF7IP for histone H3K9me3 mark on meiosis-related genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. iScience 2025, 28, 113059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wu, M.; Fan, B.; Guo, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, R.; Lv, N.; Diao, Y.; Luo, H. Knockdown of SETDB1 inhibits breast cancer progression by miR-381-3p-related regulation. Biol. Res. 2018, 51, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Dou, D.; Ge, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Seng, J.; Cao, Z.; Gu, Y.; Han, M. EZH2 contributes to cisplatin resistance in breast cancer by epigenetically suppressing miR-381 expression. Onco Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 9627–9637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zhou, J.; Che, J.; Xu, L.; Yang, W.; Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Zou, S. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 promotes hepatocellular cancer progression and chemoresistance by enhancing protein kinase B activation through microRNA-381-mediated SET domain bifurcated 1. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 5737–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Balinth, S.; Fisher, M.L.; Hwangbo, Y.; Wu, C.; Ballon, C.; Sun, X.; Mills, A.A. EZH2 regulates a SETDB1/ΔNp63α axis via RUNX3 to drive a cancer stem cell phenotype in squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2022, 41, 4130–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Shi, L.; Fang, L.; Xu, L.; Cao, Y. Neural stemness unifies cell tumorigenicity and pluripotent differentiation potential. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kungulovski, G.; Kycia, I.; Tamas, R.; Jurkowska, R.Z.; Kudithipudi, S.; Henry, C.; Reinhardt, R.; Labhart, P.; Jeltsch, A. Application of histone modification-specific interaction domains as an alternative to antibodies. Genome Res. 2014, 24, 1842–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Kaustov, L.; Ouyang, H.; Amaya, M.; Lemak, A.; Nady, N.; Duan, S.; Wasney, G.A.; Li, Z.; Vedadi, M.; Schapira, M.; et al. Recognition and specificity determinants of the human cbx chromodomains. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Ren, C.; Morohashi, K.; Plotnikov, A.N.; Jakoncic, J.; Smith, S.G.; Li, J.; Zeng, L.; Rodriguez, Y.; Stojanoff, V.; Walsh, M.; et al. Small-molecule modulators of methyl-lysine binding for the CBX7 chromodomain. Chem. Biol. 2015, 22, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Delaney, C.E.; Methot, S.P.; Kalck, V.; Seebacher, J.; Hess, D.; Gasser, S.M.; Padeken, J. SETDB1-like MET-2 promotes transcriptional silencing and development independently of its H3K9me-associated catalytic activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2022, 29, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Blackburn, M.L.; Chansky, H.A.; Zielinska-Kwiatkowska, A.; Matsui, Y.; Yang, L. Genomic structure and expression of the mouse ESET gene encoding an ERG-associated histone methyltransferase with a SET domain. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1629, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Yang, L.; Mei, Q.; Zielinska-Kwiatkowska, A.; Matsui, Y.; Blackburn, M.L.; Benedetti, D.; Krumm, A.A.; Taborsky, G.J., Jr.; Chansky, H.A. An ERG (ets-related gene)-associated histone methyltransferase interacts with histone deacetylases 1/2 and transcription co-repressors mSin3A/B. Biochem. J. 2003, 369, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Sidhwani, P.; Schwartz, J.P.; Fryer, K.A.; Straight, A.F. Histone H3 lysine methyltransferase activities control compartmentalization of human centromeres. bioRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Huang, Z.; Li, X.; Tang, B.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Sun, R.; Ma, J.; Pan, Y.; Yan, B.; Zhou, Y.; et al. SETDB1 Modulates degradation of phosphorylated RB and anticancer efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2023, 83, 875–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Hernandez-Vicens, R.; Singh, J.; Pernicone, N.; Listovsky, T.; Gerlitz, G. SETDB1 regulates microtubule dynamics. Cell Prolif. 2022, 55, e13348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Hubbert, C.; Guardiola, A.; Shao, R.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Ito, A.; Nixon, A.; Yoshida, M.; Wang, X.-F.; Yao, T.-P. HDAC6 is a microtubule-associated deacetylase. Nature 2002, 417, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mu, A.; Latario, C.J.; Pickrell, L.E.; Higgs, H.N. Lysine acetylation of cytoskeletal proteins: Emergence of an actin code. J. Cell Biol. 2020, 219, e202006151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xia, J.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, R.; Feng, J.; Ma, X.; Li, J. SETDB2 interacts with BUBR1 to induce accurate chromosome segregation independently of its histone methyltransferase activity. FEBS Open Bio 2024, 14, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Roqueta-Rivera, M.; Esquejo, R.M.; Phelan, P.E.; Sandor, K.; Daniel, B.; Foufelle, F.; Ding, J.; Li, X.; Khorasanizadeh, S.; Osborne, T.F. SETDB2 Links glucocorticoid to lipid metabolism through Insig2a regulation. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Bharadwaj, R.; Peter, C.J.; Jiang, Y.; Roussos, P.; Vogel-Ciernia, A.; Shen, E.Y.; Mitchell, A.C.; Mao, W.; Whittle, C.; Dincer, A.; et al. Conserved higher-order chromatin regulates NMDA receptor gene expression and cognition. Neuron 2014, 84, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Jiang, Y.; Loh, Y.-H.E.; Rajarajan, P.; Hirayama, T.; Liao, W.; Kassim, B.S.; Javidfar, B.; Hartley, B.J.; Kleofas, L.; Park, R.B.; et al. The methyltransferase SETDB1 regulates a large neuron-specific topological chromatin domain. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Hong, S.; Kim, D. Computational characterization of chromatin domain boundary-associated genomic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 10403–10414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. da Costa-Nunes, J.A.; Noordermeer, D. TADs: Dynamic structures to create stable regulatory functions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2023, 81, 102622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Warrier, T.; El Farran, C.; Zeng, Y.; Ho, B.S.Q.; Bao, Q.; Zheng, Z.H.; Bi, X.; Ng, H.H.; Ong, D.S.T.; Chu, J.J.H.; et al. SETDB1 acts as a topological accessory to Cohesin via an H3K9me3-independent, genomic shunt for regulating cell fates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 7326–7349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Gualdrini, F.; Polletti, S.; Simonatto, M.; Prosperini, E.; Pileri, F.; Natoli, G. H3K9 trimethylation in active chromatin restricts the usage of functional CTCF sites in SINE B2 repeats. Genes Dev. 2022, 36, 414–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sun, D.; Zhu, Y.; Peng, W.; Zheng, S.; Weng, J.; Dong, S.; Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Ge, C.; Liao, L.; et al. SETDB1 regulates short interspersed nuclear elements and chromatin loop organization in mouse neural precursor cells. Genome Biol. 2024, 25, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Tam, P.L.F.; Cheung, M.F.; Chan, L.Y.; Leung, D. Cell-type differential targeting of SETDB1 prevents aberrant CTCF binding, chromatin looping, and cis-regulatory interactions. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Zakharova, V.V.; Magnitov, M.D.; Del Maestro, L.; Ulianov, S.V.; Glentis, A.; Uyanik, B.; Williart, A.; Karpukhina, A.; Demidov, O.; Joliot, V.; et al. SETDB1 fuels the lung cancer phenotype by modulating epigenome, 3D genome organization and chromatin mechanical properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 4389–4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Ulianov, S.V.; Khrameeva, E.E.; Gavrilov, A.A.; Flyamer, I.M.; Kos, P.; Mikhaleva, E.A.; Penin, A.A.; Logacheva, M.D.; Imakaev, M.V.; Chertovich, A.; et al. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains. Genome Res. 2016, 26, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Corpet, A.; Kleijwegt, C.; Roubille, S.; Juillard, F.; Jacquet, K.; Texier, P.; Lomonte, P. PML nuclear bodies and chromatin dynamics: Catch me if you can! Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 11890–11912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Cho, S.; Park, J.S.; Kang, Y.-K. Dual functions of histone-lysine N-methyltransferase Setdb1 protein at promyelocytic leukemia-nuclear body (PML-NB): Maintaining PML-NB structure and regulating the expression of its associated genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 41115–41124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Interaction schemes of SetDB1 with other proteins, DNA, and RNA, using human SetDB1 as an example. Znf—zinc-finger domain; CD—chromodomain; CSD—chromoshadow domain. Arrows indicate lysines in proteins to which SetDB1, via its SET domain, attaches methyl groups. (ah) represent variants of interactions between proteins. Other designations and detailed explanations are provided in the text.
Figure 2. Interaction schemes of SetDB1 with other proteins, DNA, and RNA, using human SetDB1 as an example. Znf—zinc-finger domain; CD—chromodomain; CSD—chromoshadow domain. Arrows indicate lysines in proteins to which SetDB1, via its SET domain, attaches methyl groups. (ah) represent variants of interactions between proteins. Other designations and detailed explanations are provided in the text.
Epigenomes 10 00024 g002
Figure 3. Motifs surrounding lysines methylated by G9a/GLP and SetDB1. The left column lists protein names, the middle column indicates the position of the modified lysine, and the right column shows the motif containing the modified lysine, emphasized in red. The background highlights amino acids matching the A(R/K)K(S/T) motif. Positions of methylated lysines and motif compositions are taken from [84,97,99,101,102,105,106,107,108,110,112,116], as well as from the UniProt database [117].
Figure 3. Motifs surrounding lysines methylated by G9a/GLP and SetDB1. The left column lists protein names, the middle column indicates the position of the modified lysine, and the right column shows the motif containing the modified lysine, emphasized in red. The background highlights amino acids matching the A(R/K)K(S/T) motif. Positions of methylated lysines and motif compositions are taken from [84,97,99,101,102,105,106,107,108,110,112,116], as well as from the UniProt database [117].
Epigenomes 10 00024 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romanov, S.E.; Koryakov, D.E. The Many Faces of SetDB1. Epigenomes 2026, 10, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes10020024

AMA Style

Romanov SE, Koryakov DE. The Many Faces of SetDB1. Epigenomes. 2026; 10(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes10020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romanov, Stanislav E., and Dmitry E. Koryakov. 2026. "The Many Faces of SetDB1" Epigenomes 10, no. 2: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes10020024

APA Style

Romanov, S. E., & Koryakov, D. E. (2026). The Many Faces of SetDB1. Epigenomes, 10(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes10020024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop