Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Insecticides on Spotted Lanternfly Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) in Kiwifruit
Next Article in Special Issue
Description of a New Species of Mountain Midges (Diptera, Deuterophlebiidae) from Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Image Recognition of Field-Trapped Adult Spodoptera frugiperda Using Sex Pheromone Lures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphological Study of First Instar Elephant Stomach Bot Fly Larvae (Oestridae: Gasterophilinae: Cobboldia elephantis)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Taxonomic Review of the Genus Taxigramma (Diptera, Sarcophagidae, Miltogramminae) from China †

by
Zijun Liu
1,
Yi Gai
1,
Xiaolan Cheng
2,
Hanqing Li
1,
Yaqian Fan
3,
Krzysztof Szpila
4,
Thomas Pape
5 and
Dong Zhang
1,*
1
School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Qinghua East Road 35, Beijing 100083, China
2
Dalian International Travel Health Care Centre (Port Clinic of Dalian Customs District), Dalian 116007, China
3
Beijing Songshan National Nature Reserve Administration, Beijing 102100, China
4
Department of Ecology and Biogeography, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland
5
Natural History Museum of Denmark, Science Faculty, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4EF678C-93DE-42F3-A722-1D0C038438E5.
Insects 2025, 16(9), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090953
Submission received: 29 July 2025 / Revised: 30 August 2025 / Accepted: 1 September 2025 / Published: 11 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diptera Diversity: Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)

Simple Summary

Taxigramma Perris, 1852 is a small genus within the subfamily Miltogramminae, comprising a total of 20 species. This study presents the first review of all Taxigramma species from China, reporting two newly recorded species, T. pluriseta (Pandellé, 1895) and T. pluton (Verves, 1984) and removing T. karakulensis (Enderlein, 1933), thereby raising the number of species recorded from China to eight. Based on recent collecting and examination of museum specimens, we have updated the checklist including relevant geographical and biological information, along with giving an identification key for all species of Taxigramma currently known from China. Additionally, we bring the first description of the male T. albina (Rohdendorf, 1935), and sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) are provided for T. albina, T. pluriseta and T. pluton for the first time, while preliminarily investigating the intra- and interspecific genetic distances of Taxigramma species.

Abstract

The genus Taxigramma from China has been taxonomically reviewed. Taxigramma pluriseta and T. pluton are new to the fauna sinica, while T. karakulensis is removed. The male of T. albina is firstly recorded and described from China. An updated checklist of all eight species of Taxigramma known from China is presented with newly supplemented specimen examinations, biological observations and distributional information. A taxonomic key to the Chinese species of Taxigramma is also provided. COI sequences of T. albina, T. pluriseta and T. pluton are newly obtained, with a concise analysis of their genetic divergence among species of Taxigramma.

1. Introduction

The genus Taxigramma Perris, 1852 is a relatively low-diversity taxon within the subfamily Miltogramminae, comprising only 20 species [1,2]. Alternative taxonomic treatments have been proposed [3,4], wherein this group is subdivided into four distinct genera (Hilarella Rondani, 1856, Metopodia Brauer & Bergenstamm, 1889, Paragusia Schiner, 1861 and Taxigramma), all of which are classified under the tribe Taxigrammini Rohdendorf, 1967 [2].
In the early taxonomic studies, only five species of this genus were reported from China: Taxigramma elegantula (Zetterstedt, 1844), T. heteroneura (Meigen, 1830), T. multipunctata (Rondani, 1859), T. stictica (Meigen, 1830) [5,6,7] and T. karakulensis (Enderlein, 1933) [1] [note: Xue & Chao [6] additionally reported Hilarella siphonina (Zetterstedt, 1844), which was subsequently treated as a junior synonym of T. stictica].
In subsequent studies, Taxigramma albina (Rohdendorf, 1935) was firstly reported from Kalamaili Mountain Ungulate Nature Reserve (hereafter referred to as Kalamaili) in China [8]. In a taxonomic revision employing Anchored Hybrid Enrichment (AHE) methodology, Metopodia was treated as a junior synonym of Taxigramma [2]. Consequently, the species previously recorded from China as Metopodia pilicornis (Pandellé, 1895) has been reclassified under the genus Taxigramma, thereby increasing the documented records of the genus Taxigramma from China to seven species.
Examination of specimens collected from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China revealed two previously undocumented species, T. pluriseta and T. pluton. Aditionally, the male of T. albina from the Turpan–Hami Basin and Kalamaili is described for the first time. Taxigramma karakulensis is removed as a doubtful species in China due to the lack of detailed records and the absence of examined Chinese specimens. The Chinese Taxigramma fauna now includes eight species. This study successfully sequenced COI genes from seven Chinese Taxigramma species, including the first-reported genetic data for three species, T. albina, T. pluriseta and T. pluton. No specimens of T. pilicornis were available for destructive sampling for DNA extraction. Preliminary assessment of interspecific divergence was conducted using combined data from NCBI GenBank. We also obtained COI sequences of T. multipunctata from Xinjiang, Sichuan and Hainan, enabling initial analysis of its intraspecific genetic distances.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collecting Sites

All specimens examined in this study were collected from China, predominantly within the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region—a suitable habitat for Miltogramminae fauna. Sampling efforts focused on ecologically distinctive zones such as Turpan-Hami Basin, Karamaili and border areas.

2.2. Specimen Processing

Specimens of Taxigramma were collected by hand net, euthanized with ethyl acetate vapors and dry-pinned. Material examined in the present study are preserved in Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China; Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China and Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Dissection of terminalia followed Zhang et al. [8].

2.3. Morphological Study

Female terminalia and spermathecae were photographed with a Canon 750D camera (Canon, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) coupled to a ZEISS Axio Imager.D2 upright microscope (Zeiss AG., Oberkochen, Germany), while all other light microscope images were captured using the same camera mounted on an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Photo stacking was carried out using the software Helicon Focus 8.1.0 Pro (Helicon Soft Ltd., Kharkov, Ukraine) and then processed using Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Terminology follows Cumming and Wood [9]. The nomenclature and classification follow Pape [1] modified by Johnston et al. [2].

2.4. DNA Sequencing and Analysis

Total genomic DNA was extracted from three right legs of each individual using the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen GmbH., Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocols (accession: PX133180–PX133184). A fragment near the 5′ terminus of the mitochondrial COI gene was amplified with universal primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 [10].
Electrophoretic analysis on 1% agarose gels indicated severe DNA degradation in T. elegantula (accession: PX133185). Consequently, amplification was performed on a mini-barcode region within the standard COI fragment, using primers miniBarcode-F and miniBarcode-R designed for degraded DNA. All primers were PAGE-purified to enhance specificity and synthesized by BGI Tech. Inc. (Shenzhen, China). Primer sequences are given in Table 1.
PCR reactions were performed in a 25-μL volume containing 12.5 μL of 2 × Taq Mastermix (Jiangsu Cowin Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 8.5 μL of ddH2O, 2 μL of DNA template, and 1 μL of each primer. The thermal cycling profile included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 47 °C for 2 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were held at 4 °C post-amplification.
Additionally, three decade-old specimens of T. multipunctata (accession: PX133186–PX133188) yielded no amplification using the above protocol. DNA was therefore extracted from abdominal tissue using the Hotshot method [11], followed by amplification of the mini-barcode region. PCR was conducted in a 20-μL reaction mixture containing 10 μL of 2 × Taq Mastermix, 5.2 μL of ddH2O, 4 μL of DNA template, and 0.4 μL of each primer. Thermocycling conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 7 min 30 s; 39 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s; final extension at 72 °C for 7 min 30 s; followed by storage at 4 °C.
PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gels. The unpurified PCR reactions were then directly submitted to BGI Tech. Inc.
Available COI sequences identified to species level within the genus Taxigramma were retrieved from NCBI GenBank (access date: 24 July 2025), yielding 11 sequences. These were combined with nine COI sequences (259–614 bp) from seven Taxigramma species that were generated and deposited in GenBank in this study (PX133180–PX133188) (notes see Table 2). All sequences were aligned using MUSCLE implemented in MEGA7 [12]. Pairwise genetic distances based on the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model [13] were calculated within MEGA7.
Neighbor-Joining (NJ) trees were reconstructed under the Kimura 2-parameter model in MEGA7. Node support was assessed with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Table 2. Taxon sampling for genetic distance analysis in the present study.
Table 2. Taxon sampling for genetic distance analysis in the present study.
AccessionSpeciesCollection SiteSource
KY749763T. multipunctataIsraelGenBank/Piwczyński et al. [14]
KY749761T. heteroneuraPolandGenBank/Piwczyński et al. [14]
MN411060T. heteroneura-GenBank
KY749762T. hilarellaPolandGenBank/Piwczyński et al. [14]
MZ628314T. hilarellaFinlandGenBank/Roslin et al. [15]
KY749764T. sticticaPolandGenBank/Piwczyński et al. [14]
KY749760T. elegantulaPolandGenBank/Piwczyński et al. [14]
MZ623189T. elegantulaFinlandGenBank/Roslin et al. [15]
MZ623596T. elegantulaFinlandGenBank/Roslin et al. [15]
MZ627095T. elegantulaFinlandGenBank/Roslin et al. [15]
KY749727T. pilicornisPolandGenBank/Piwczyński et al. [14]
PX133180T. albinaXinjiang (Yiwu)This study
PX133181T. plutonXinjiang (Alashankou)This study
PX133182T. plurisetaXinjiang (Jimsar)This study
PX133183T. sticticaXinjiang (Huocheng)This study
PX133184T. heteroneuraXinjiang (Alashankou)This study
PX133185T. elegantulaXinjiang (Jeminay)This study
PX133186T. multipunctataXinjiang (Altay)This study
PX133187T. multipunctataSichuan (Panzhihua)This study
PX133188T. multipunctataHainan (Yinggeling)This study

3. Results

3.1. Species Checklist

3.1.1. Taxigramma albina (Rohdendorf, 1935) (Figure 1A,B, Figure 3A,B,F, Figure 5A,B,F,G, Figure 7A–F and Figure 10A–E)

Hilarella albina Rohdendorf, 1935: 114 [16].
Taxigramma albina: Pape, 1996: 152; Johnston et al., 2023: 143 & Suppl. fig. S4; Zhang et al., 2021: 40, 44 [1,2,8].
Description of male: Body length 3.80–5.50 mm.
Head. Eye bare, red. Ommatidia equally large. Fronto-orbital plate, parafacial plate and postocular strip yellow with light silvery gray pollinosity. Parafacial with one row of fine bristles, about 0.31 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part. Frontal vitta yellow, with sparse pollinosity, about 0.24 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part (Figure 7D). Frons at vertex about 0.34 × head width; frontal row of 8–9 bristles; outer vertical bristle differentiated from postocular bristles, two proclinate orbital bristles. Ocelli red; ocellar setae strong, directed anterolaterally. Gena ground color yellow, with black bristles and silvery gray pollinosity, height about 0.10 × eye height in lateral view (Figure 7F). Pedicel yellowish to dark yellow; first flagellomere grayish-brown, not reaching the level of vibrissal insertion, about 3.40 × as long as pedicel (Figure 7E); arista short plumose, swollen in basal 1/3 (Figure 5G). Postocular setae in 1 row. Palpus yellow, slightly expanded in distal part. Labellum brown, with fine setae. Vibrissa developed.
Thorax ground color black with silvery gray pollinosity. Chaetotaxy: acrostichals 0 + 1, dorsocentrals 2 + 3, intra-alars 0 + 1(2), postalars 2, postpronotals 2, notopleurals 2, scutellum with 1 apical, 1 lateral, 1 basal and 1 discal bristles. Pleuron with meropleurals 5, katepisternal bristles 1:1, prosternum, metasternum, proepisternal depression and postalar wall all bare.
Wing hyaline; subcostal sclerite and basicosta yellow, bare; tegula yellow, with black fine setulae; costal spine differentiated; vein R1 bare; node of R2+3 and R4+5 with three to five fine black setae dorsally and two or three fine black setae ventrally; cell r4+5 closed (Figure 5B); calypter yellowish-white, halter yellow.
Legs black except for the yellowish knee and yellowish-brown tibia and fore tarsus. Fore femur with dense and long bristles along posterodorsal, posterior, ventral and posteroventral margins, fore tibia with one median posterior bristles, fore tarsomeres 1–5 each with an elongated hair-like seta both apico-anteriorly and apico-posteriorly (Figure 3F); mid femur with two apical posterodorsal bristles, mid tibia with two or three posterodorsal bristles, and with one or two median ventral bristles; hind femur with one row of anterodorsal bristles (about 11) and one apical anteroventral bristle, hind tibia with one row of strong anterodorsal bristles (about 12), one row of anteroventral bristles (about 5) and one row of posterodorsal bristles (about 10).
Abdomen long oval, with gray pollinosity and black spots. Tergite 3 to tergite 5 each possesses one pair of lateral spots and one single median spot, with an additional pair of spots situated between the median and lateral ones. Syntergite 1 + 2 only with one pair of spots (Figure 3B). Tergite 3 and tergite 4 both with one pair of developed median marginal bristles, tergite 5 with complete row of marginal bristles.
Terminalia. Cercus and surstylus elongate, the outer margin and apex of phallus membranous (Figure 10A). Sternite 5 shield-shaped (Figure 10B).
Redescription of female: Body length 5.30 mm.
Body light-colored with uniformly dense white pollinosity. Head. Parafacial about 0.60 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part (Figure 7A). Frontal vitta about 0.55 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part. Frons at vertex about 0.40 × head width. Gena height about 0.13 × eye height in lateral view (Figure 7C). First flagellomere about 3.55 × as long as pedicel (Figure 7B).
Legs. Fore tarsus without specialized setae.
Terminalia see Figure 10C–E.
Other morphological characteristics are similar to those of the male.
Chinese specimens examined: Xinjiang: 1 male, Altay, Kalamaili, 1.V.2015, M. Zhang & C. Wang; 1 female, Altay, Kalamaili, 7.V.2015, M. Zhang & C. Wang; 1 male, Yiwu, Naomaohu, Yiwu Populus Forest, 20.VII.2024, Z.J. Liu; 2 males, Gaochang, Ayding Lake National Wetland Park, 7–9.VI.2025, Z.J. Liu (all BFU).
Chinese distribution: Xinjiang (Altay, Gaochang, Yiwu).
Biology: This species is psammophilous. In Kalamaili, adults were collected near water sources. It has been recorded as a kleptoparasite on multiple taxa within the superfamily Apoidea [17].
Remarks: This species was described based solely on three female specimens [16], while Taxigramma (Hilarelliscum) popovi Rohdendorf, 1935 was established exclusively from two male specimens (both nominal taxa from Uzbekistan). In Pape’s study [1], T. popovi was treated as a junior synonym of T. albina, though detailed supporting evidence remains unpublished; the taxonomic validity of these two nominal taxa requires further investigation. Taxigramma albina is evidently morphologically very similar to T. hilarella (Zetterstedt, 1844). Rohdendorf [16], who did not have males of T. albina, separated these two species based on small differences in proportions and setosity of the head and a generally lighter color of T. albina, all of which are features prone to variation. Comparing the present photos of male fore tarsus and terminalia of T. albina (Figure 3F and Figure 10A,B) with illustrations of the same structures for T. hilarella in Pape (1987, figs. 100–104) [18] indicates possible differences, of which the very slender surstylus of T. albina is particularly noteworthy. While the morphology is inconclusive, the molecular signal appears much stronger, with distances for T. albina of 5.14–5.58% to T. hilarella and 8.11–8.61% to T. stictica (Table 3).

3.1.2. Taxigramma elegantula (Zetterstedt, 1844) (Figure 2A,B, Figure 3G, Figure 4A,B, Figure 6A,B and Figure 8A–F)

Tachina elegantula Zetterstedt, 1844: 1024 [19].
Paragusia elegantula: Verves, 2020: 17 [3].
Taxigramma (Paragusia) elegantula: Fan, 1992: 599; Xue & Chao, 1998: 1548 [5,6].
Taxigramma elegantula: Fan & Pape, 1996: 241; Pape, 1996: 152; Zhang et al., 2021: 40, 42 [1,7,8].
Chinese specimens examined: Neimenggu: 1 male, Erenhot, Hongor, 11.VII.1972, C.M. Chao; 3 males, Urad Rear Banner, Mt. Langshan, 29.VI.1978, C.M. Chao; Xinjiang: 1 male, 1 female, Baicheng, Akeqisu, alt. 2400 m, 17.V.1978, X.Z. Zhang; 1 male, 1 female, Akto, Aketashi, alt. 2400 m, 27.VI.1987, X.Z. Zhang; 4 males, 1 female, Taxkorgan, Mazha, alt. 3900 m, 3.VII.1987, X.Z. Zhang; 8 males, 2 females, Akto, Qiakelike, alt. 3250 m, 13.VII.1987, X.Z. Zhang; 1 female, Yecheng, Akeqige, alt. 2700 m, 13.VIII.1987, X.Z. Zhang; 1 male, Yecheng, Supikeya, alt. 2700–2850 m, 17.VIII.1987, X.Z. Zhang; 1 female, Qiemo, Aqiang, alt. 3000 m, 24.VII.1988, X.Z. Zhang; 1 female, Akto, Wuyitake, alt. 2650 m, 8.VIII.1989, X.Z. Zhang; 2 females, Taxkorgan, Laqigu, alt. 3550 m, 16.VIII.1989, X.Z. Zhang (all IZCAS); Xinjiang: 2 female, Shule, alt. 1280 m, 10.V.2007, M.L. Sheng (both SYNU); Ningxia: 4 males, 2 females, Lingwu, 4–29.VI.2012; Xinjiang: 20 males, 6 females, Altay, Kalamaili, 9.V–9.VI.2015, M. Zhang; 34 males, 11 females, Altay, Kalamaili, 26.IV–4.VII.2015, M. Zhang & C. Wang; 1 male, Altay, Kalamaili, 12.V.2024, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, 1 female, Jeminay, Jeminay Town, 7.VI.2024, Z.J. Liu; 1 female, Barkol, Xiheigou, 12.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 5 males, 1 female, Yiwu, Rezibulake, 16–17.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 1 female, Yizhou, Baishanquan Service Area on G7 Beijing-Xinjiang Expressway (towards Beijing), 17.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Ruoqiang, Lop Nur Wild Camel National Nature Reserve, 26.VIII.2025, Y. Gai (all BFU).
Chinese distribution: Neimenggu (Erenhot, Urad Rear Banner), Ningxia (Lingwu), Xinjiang (Akto, Altay, Baicheng, Barkol, Jeminay, Qiemo, Ruoqiang, Shule, Taxkorgan, Yecheng, Yiwu, Yizhou).
Biology: In Kalamaili, adults can be abundantly collected near water sources in May. This species has been recorded as a kleptoparasite with hosts across Apoidea and Formicoidea [17].

3.1.3. Taxigramma heteroneura (Meigen, 1830) (Figure 1C, Figure 3C,J, Figure 5C and Figure 7G–I)

Miltogramma heteroneura Meigen, 1830: 367 [20].
Taxigramma heteroneura: Fan, 1992: 599; Fan & Pape, 1996: 243; Pape, 1996: 153; Verves, 2020: 17; Xue & Chao, 1998: 1548 [1,3,5,6,7].
Chinese specimens examined: Neimenggu: 3 males, Shangdu, 19.VI.1971; Hebei: Weichang, Saihanba, alt. 1500 m, 22.VII.1985, X.Z. Zhang; Xinjiang: 1 male, Zhaosu, alt. 1620 m, 7.VIII.1957, G. Wang (all IZCAS); Neimenggu: 25 males, Qahar Right Rear Banner, Volcano No. 6 of the Ulan Had Volcanic Cluster, 20.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; Xinjiang: 1 male, Altay, Kalamaili, 9.VI.2014, M. Zhang; 4 males, Alashankou, 28.V.2024, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Yumin, 5.VI.2024, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Barkol, Barkol Grassland, 24.VI.2024, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Barkol, Santanghu, 13–15.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Yiwu, Rezibulake, 16–17.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu (all BFU).
Chinese distribution: Neimenggu (Qahar Right Rear Banner, Shangdu), Hebei (Weichang), Xinjiang (Alashankou, Altay, Barkol, Yiwu, Yumin, Zhaosu).
Biology. In Alashankou, Barkol and Yumin, adults occur in sparsely vegetated grasslands, where individuals perch or hover near the entrances of ground-nesting bee burrows, while in Kalamaili, it can be found on sun-exposed earthen slopes near water sources. This species has been recorded as a kleptoparasite of solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) [17].

3.1.4. Taxigramma multipunctata (Rondani, 1859) (Figure 2C,D, Figure 4C,D, Figure 6C,D and Figure 8G–L)

Heteropterina multipunctata Rondani, 1859: 211 [21].
Paragusia multipunctata: Fan & Pape, 1996: 241; Verves, 2020: 17 [3,7].
Taxigramma multipunctata: Pape, 1996: 154; Zhang et al., 2021: 40, 43 [1,8].
Taxigramma (Eutaxigramma) multipunctata: Fan, 1992: 599; Xue & Chao, 1998: 1548 [5,6].
Chinese specimens examined: Heilongjiang: 1 female, Tailai, 25.VI.1970; Neimenggu: 1 male, Erenhot, 31.VII.1972; Xinjiang: 1 female, Jimsar, 17.V.1955, S.J. Ma, K.L. Xia & Y.L. Chen; Sichuan: 1 female, Panzhihua, alt. 1200 m, 17.IV.1986; Yunnan: 1 female, Lancang, alt. 1000 m, 2.VIII.1957, L.C. Zang; 1 female, Xishuangbanna, Mengzhe, alt. 1200 m, 19.VI.1958, Z.Z. Chen (all IZCAS); Xinjiang: 4 males, 1 female, Altay, Kalamaili, 11–16.VIII.2009, D. Zhang; 18 males, 21 females, Altay, Kalamaili, 7.V–16.VI.2014, M. Zhang; 11 males, 2 females, Altay, Kalamaili, 26.IV–9.VII.2015, M. Zhang; 1 male, Alashankou, 27.V.2024, Z.J. Liu; 2 males, 2 females, Yizhou, Baishanquan Service Area on G7 Beijing-Xinjiang Expressway (towards Ürümqi), 17.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 5 males, 2 females, Yizhou, Miaoergou, 5.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 3 males, Yiwu, Rezibulake, 16–17.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; Hainan: 2 males, Yinggeling, 28.VI.2016, L.P. Yan & C. Wang; Sichuan: 4 males, Panzhihua, 10–11.VII.2015, L.P. Yan & C. Wang (all BFU).
Chinese distribution: Heilongjiang (Tailai), Neimenggu (Erenhot), Xinjiang (Alashankou, Altay, Jimsar, Yiwu, Yizhou), Hainan (Yinggeling); Sichuan (Panzhihua), Yunnan (Lancang, Xishuangbanna).
Biology: In Kalamaili, adults can be abundantly collected near water sources during May to June. This species has been recorded as a kleptoparasite of solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) [17].

3.1.5. Taxigramma pilicornis (Pandellé, 1895) (Figure 1E,F, Figure 3E, Figure 5E,H and Figure 7M–O)

Metopia pilicornis Pandellé, 1895: 304 [22].
Metopodia pilicornis: Fan & Pape, 1996: 240; Pape, 1996: 104; Verves, 2020: 12 [1,3,7].
Metopodia grisea [misidentification: not Miltogramma grisea Meigen, 1824]: Fan, 1992: 596, 597; Xue & Chao, 1998: 1543, 1544 [5,6].
Taxigramma pilicornis: Johnston et al., 2023: 149 [2].
Chinese specimens examined: Beijing: 1 male, VII.1933; 3 males, Haidian, Wofo Temple, 25.V.1961; 1 male, Yanqing, Badaling, alt. 700 m, 28.VI.1962, S.Y. Wang; 1 male, Yanqing, 26.VI.1970 (all IZCAS).
Chinese distribution: Beijing (Haidian, Yanqing).
Biology: The species is frequently observed in sandy habitats along riverbanks and coastal shorelines [23,24]. Sphex funerarius Gussakovskij, 1934 (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) is the only currently known host for this species [25].

3.1.6. Taxigramma pluriseta (Pandellé, 1895) (Figure 2E,F, Figure 3H, Figure 4E,F, Figure 5J, Figure 6E,F and Figure 9A–F)

Heteropterina pluriseta Pandellé, 1895: 313 [22].
Taxigramma pluriseta: Pape, 1996: 154 [1].
Redescription of male: Body length 3.80–5.00 mm.
Head. Eye bare. Ommatidia equally large. Fronto-orbital plate, parafacial plate and postocular strip yellow with light silvery gray pollinosity. Parafacial with one or two rows of fine bristles, about 0.56 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part. Frontal vitta yellow, with sparse pollinosity, about 0.56 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part (Figure 9A). Frons at vertex about 0.37 × head width; frontal row of 6–7 bristles; outer vertical bristle differentiated from postocular bristles, two proclinate orbital bristles. Ocelli red; ocellar setae strong, directed anterolaterally. Gena ground color yellow, with black bristles and silvery gray pollinosity, height about 0.16 × eye height in lateral view (Figure 9C). Pedicel yellowish-white; first flagellomere yellowish-white to greyish-white, not reaching the level of vibrissal insertion, about 2.45 × as long as pedicel (Figure 9B); arista almost bare, only pubescent, swollen in basal 1/3 (Figure 5J). Postocular setae in 1 row. Palpus yellow, slightly expanded in distal part. Labellum brown, with fine setae. Vibrissa developed.
Thorax ground color black with silvery gray pollinosity. Chaetotaxy: acrostichals 1(2) + 1, dorsocentrals 2 + 3, intra-alars 1 + 2(3), postalars 2, postpronotals 2, notopleurals 2, scutellum with 1 apical, 1 lateral, 1 basal and 1 discal bristles. Pleuron with meropleurals 2–4, katepisternal bristles 1:1, prosternum, metasternum, proepisternal depression and postalar wall all bare.
Wing hyaline; subcostal sclerite and basicosta yellow, bare; tegula yellow, with black fine setulae; costal spine differentiated; vein R1 bare; node of R2+3 and R4+5 with one or two fine black setae dorsally and one fine black seta ventrally or absent; cell r4+5 distinctly petiolate (Figure 6E); calypter yellowish-white, halter yellow.
Legs mostly black except for the yellowish knee. Fore femur with dense and long bristles along posterodorsal, posterior, ventral and posteroventral margins, fore tibia with one submedian posterior bristles, fore tarsus with about eight short fine setae (Figure 3H); mid femur with two apical posterodorsal bristles, mid tibia with two to four posterodorsal bristles, and with one or two median ventral bristles; hind femur with one row of anterodorsal bristles (about 9) and one apical anteroventral bristle, hind tibia with one row of strong anterodorsal bristles (about 5), three or four anteroventral bristles and three to six posterodorsal bristles.
Abdomen long oval, with gray pollinosity and black spots. Syntergite 1 + 2 to tergite 5 each possesses one pair of lateral spots and one single median spot, with an additional pair of spots situated between the median and lateral ones, with those lateral and median spots on the syntergite 1 + 2 being indistinct or absent, while the median spot and adjacent spots on the tergite 5 sometimes are fused (Figure 4E). Syntergite 1 + 2 only with one pair of fine median marginal bristles or absent. Tergite 3 and tergite 4 both with one pair of developed median marginal bristles, tergite 5 with complete row of marginal bristles.
Redescription of female: Body length 3.50–4.80 mm.
Head. Parafacial about 0.66 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part (Figure 9D). Frontal vitta about 0.65 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part. Frons at vertex about 0.41 × head width. Gena height about 0.17 × eye height in lateral view (Figure 9F). First flagellomere about 1.75 × as long as pedicel (Figure 9E).
Legs. Fore tarsus without specialized setae.
Other morphological characteristics are similar to those of the male.
Chinese specimens examined: Xinjiang: 2 males, Shawan, alt. 415 m, 13.VI.1957, C.P. Hong; 1 female, Manas, alt. 400–550 m, 4.VII.1957, G. Wang (all IZCAS); Xinjiang: 9 males, 2 female, Altay, Kalamaili, 9–16.VI.2014, M. Zhang; 1 male, Jimsar, Przewalski’s Horse Breeding and Research Center, 14.V.2024, Z.J. Liu (all BFU).
Chinese distribution: Xinjiang (Altay, Jimsar, Manas, Shawan).
Biology: In Kalamaili and Jimsar, adults can be found near water sources or visiting flowering plants. This species has only been recorded as a kleptoparasite on Prionyx kirbii (Vander Linden, 1827) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) [17].

3.1.7. Taxigramma pluton (Verves, 1984) (Figure 1D, Figure 3D, Figure 5D,K and Figure 7J–L)

Paragusia pluton Verves, 1984: 544 [26].
Taxigramma pluton: Pape, 1996: 154 [1].
Redescription of male: Body length 4.50–5.50 mm.
Head. Eye bare. Ommatidia equally large. Fronto-orbital plate, parafacial plate and postocular strip brown with silvery gray pollinosity. Parafacial about 0.53 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part, bears two rows of fine bristles, with one complete and another one restricted to the upper part. Frontal vitta with sparse pollinosity, about 0.48 × as wide as fronto-orbital plate in median part (Figure 7J). Frons at vertex about 0.35 × head width; frontal row of 9–10 bristles; outer vertical bristle differentiated from postocular bristles, two or three proclinate orbital bristles. Ocelli red; ocellar setae strong, directed anterolaterally. Gena ground color brown, with black bristles and silvery gray pollinosity, height about 0.14 × eye height in lateral view (Figure 7L). Pedicel yellow in apical part; first flagellomere grayish-brown, not reaching the level of vibrissal insertion, about 3.00 × as long as pedicel (Figure 7K); arista almost bare, only pubescent, swollen in basal 1/3 (Figure 5K). Postocular setae in 2 rows. Palpus yellow, slightly expanded in distal part. Labellum brown, with fine setae. Vibrissa developed.
Thorax ground color black with gray pollinosity. Chaetotaxy: acrostichals 1(2) + 1(2), dorsocentrals 2 + 3, intra–alars 0(1) + 2, postalars 2, postpronotals 2, notopleurals 2, scutellum with 1 apical, 1 lateral, 1 basal and 1 discal bristles. Pleuron with meropleurals 3–4, katepisternal bristles 1:1, prosternum, metasternum, proepisternal depression and postalar wall all bare.
Wing hyaline; subcostal sclerite and basicosta yellow, bare; tegula yellow, with black fine setulae; costal spine differentiated; vein R1 bare; node of R2+3 and R4+5 with one to five fine black setae dorsally and one or two fine black setae ventrally; cell r4+5 closed (Figure 5D); calypter yellowish-white, halter brown.
Legs mostly black except for the yellowish knee. Fore femur with dense and long bristles along posterodorsal, posterior, ventral and posteroventral margins, fore tibia with one row of slender anterodorsal bristles (about 5), one row of slender posterodorsal bristles (about 6) and one submedian posterior bristles; mid femur with two apical posterodorsal bristles, mid tibia with one row of posterodorsal bristles (about 6), and with one or two median ventral bristles; hind femur with one row of anterodorsal bristles (about 9) and one apical anteroventral bristle, hind tibia with one row of strong anterodorsal bristles (about 7), three or four anteroventral bristles and five to seven posterodorsal bristles.
Abdomen long oval, with gray pollinosity and black spots. Syntergite 1 + 2 to tergite 5 each possess one pair of lateral spots, with those on the syntergite 1 + 2 being indistinct or absent. Tergite 3 to tergite 5 each with indistinct median spot, typically manifests as two small spots at the base of the median marginal bristles, exhibiting a indistinct medial discontinuity. Syntergite 1 + 2 to tergite 5 each with an additional pair of indistinct spots situated between the median and lateral ones, while the median spot and adjacent spots on the tergite 5 sometimes are fused (Figure 3D). Tergite 3 and tergite 4 both with one pair of developed median marginal bristles, tergite 5 with complete row of marginal bristles.
Chinese specimens examined: Xinjiang: 1 male, Akto, Aketashi, alt. 2400 m, 27.VI.1987, X.Z. Zhang (IZCAS); Xinjiang: 1 male, Qinghe, Bulgan River Beaver Nature Reserve, 8.VIII.2015, Y.Q. Ge; 2 males, Alashankou, 28.V.2024, Z.J. Liu; 12 males, Yizhou, Tianshengquan Village, 7–8.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Yizhou, Shiyaofang, 8.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Barkol, Xiheigou, 12.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 10 males, Yiwu, Rezibulake, 16–17.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu (all BFU).
Chinese distribution: Xinjiang (Akto, Alashankou, Barkol, Qinghe, Yiwu, Yizhou).
Biology: In Alashankou, adults occur in sparsely vegetated grasslands.

3.1.8. Taxigramma stictica (Meigen, 1830) (Figure 2G,H, Figure 3I, Figure 4G,H, Figure 5I, Figure 6G,H and Figure 9G–L)

Miltogramma stictica Meigen, 1830: 367 [20].
Miltogramma siphonina Zetterstedt, 1844: 1213 [19].
Taxigramma stictica: Pape, 1996: 154 [1].
Hilarella siphonina: Xue & Chao, 1998: 1536, 1537 [6].
Hilarella stictica: Fan, 1996: 598; Fan & Pape, 1996: 239; Verves, 2020: 17; Xue & Chao, 1998: 1537 [3,5,6,7].
Chinese specimens examined: Neimenggu: 2 males, 1 female, Qahar Right Rear Banner, Temurtei, 4–8.VI.1971; 3 males, 3 females, Qahar Right Rear Banner, Temurtei, 25.VII–1.VIII.1971; 11 males, 4 females, Qahar Right Rear Banner, Temurtei, 12–30.VIII.1971; 2 males, Erenhot, 23.VIII. 1971; 1 female, Xilinhot, 19.VIII.1972; Hebei: 1 male, 1 female, Weichang, Saihanba, alt. 1500 m, 22.VII.1985, X.Z. Zhang (all IZCAS); Neimenggu: 1 female, Tumed Left Banner, Shaerqin, 14–28.IX (SYNU); Neimenggu: 2 males, 1 female, Qahar Right Rear Banner, Volcano No. 6 of the Ulan Had Volcanic Cluster, 20.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; Beijing: 1 male, 1 female, Yanqing, Mt. Songshan, 1–5.VI.2009; 1 male, Mentougou, Xiaolongmen, 6–12.VII.2009, R. Bi & F. Li; Shanxi: 1 female, Lingqiu, Xiaguan, 11.VI.1980, M.F. Wang; 1 female, Shanyin, Shangliyangquan, 12.VII.1980, M.F. Wang; Xinjiang: 4 males, Huocheng, Guozigou, 30.V.2024, Z.J. Liu; 9 males, 1 female, Barkol, Barkol Grassland, 24.VI.2024, Z.J. Liu; 1 male, Barkol, Barkol Grassland, 11.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu; 2 males, 1 female, Yiwu, Rezibulake, 16–17.VIII.2025, Z.J. Liu (all BFU).
Chinese distribution: Neimenggu (Qahar Right Rear Banner, Erenhot, Tumed Left Banner, Xilinhot), Beijing (Mentougou, Yanqing), Hebei (Weichang), Shanxi (Lingqiu, Shanyin), Xinjiang (Barkol, Huocheng, Yiwu).
Biology: In Barkol and Huocheng, adults occur in sparsely vegetated grasslands, where individuals perch or hover near the entrances of ground-nesting bee burrows. The known hosts of this kleptoparasitic species include multiple species within the superfamily Apoidea [17].

3.2. Key to Known Chinese Species of Genus Taxigramma

1.
Arista with medium-long plumosity in basal 1/2 (Figure 5H); proepisternal depression setose (Figure 1F); cell r4+5 narrowly open (Figure 5E) ………T. pilicornis
Arista with short plumosity or pubescence; proepisternal depression bare; cell r4+5 closed at wing margin or petiolate ………………………………………………………………………2
2.
Arista with short plumosity (Figure 5F,G,I); the distal section of the vein CuA1 distinctly shorter than its preceding section (Figure 5A,B and Figure 6G,H) ………………………3
Arista almost bare, only with pubescence (Figure 5J,K); the distal section of the vein CuA1 typically equal to or longer than its preceding section (Figure 5C,D and Figure 6A–F) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4
3.
Abdomen without large, complete median spots, tergite 3 to tergite 5 each with one pair of small spots at the base of the median marginal bristles; body densely covered with yellowish-gray pollinosity (Figure 2G,H and Figure 4G,H); male fore tarsus with about 8 fine, hair-like setae on the posterior surface (Figure 3I) …………T. stictica
Abdomen with large, complete median spots; body densely covered with light silvery gray pollinosity (Figure 1A,B and Figure 3A,B); male fore tarsomeres 1–5 each with a pair of fine, hair-like setae apically (Figure 3F) …………………………………T. albina
4.
Male claws and pulvilli large, the former approximately equal in length to tarsomere 5, while the latter distinctly longer than tarsomere 5 (Figure 3J); distal section of vein CuA1 more than 2.00 × as long as the preceding section (Figure 5C); male terminalia prominently protruding, extending beyond tergite 5 ……………………T. heteroneura
Male claws and pulvilli small, both shorter than tarsomere 5; distal section of vein CuA1 at most 1.50 × as long as the preceding section (Figure 5D and Figure 6A–F); male terminalia non-protruding ………………………………………………………………………5
5.
The length of the post-bend section of vein M approximately equal to the length between the bend of vein M and crossvein r-m; cell r4+5 closed at wing margin or petiolate (Figure 6A,B,E,F); male fore tarsus with about 8 fine, hair-like setae (Figure 3G,H); the frons wide in lateral view, protruding anteriorly (Figure 8C and Figure 9C) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6
The length of the post-bend section of vein M about 1.25–1.50 × as long as the length between the bend of vein M and crossvein r-m; cell r4+5 closed at wing margin (Figure 5D and Figure 6C,D); male fore tarsus without fine, hair-like setae; the frons narrow in lateral view, non-protruding anteriorly (Figure 7L and Figure 8I,L) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7
6.
Head with dense light silvery gray pollinosity; gena tapering gradually downward; vibrissal angle non-protruding (Figure 8C,F); proboscis short, not reach the anterior margin of the eye in lateral view; cell r4+5 closed at wing margin or indistinctly petiolate (Figure 6A,B) ………………………………………………………………………T. elegantula
Head with sparse silvery gray pollinosity, revealing the yellowish ground coloration; gena with nearly parallel inner and outer margins; vibrissal angle protruding anteriorly (Figure 9C,F); proboscis long, distinctly extends beyond the anterior margin of the eye in lateral view; cell r4+5 distinctly petiolate (Figure 6E,F) …………………………………………………………………………………T. pluriseta
7.
Abdomen without large, complete median spots, tergite 3 to tergite 5 each with one pair of small spots at the base of the median marginal bristles, indistinctly fused into a vestigial median spot (Figure 3D); the length of the post-bend section of vein M about 1.25 × as long as the length between the bend of vein M and crossvein r-m; wing margin with long, distally recurved bristles arranged in a uniformly spaced, pectinate series (Figure 5D); body generally dark-colored (Figure 1D) ……………T. pluton
Abdomen with large, complete median spots on tergite 3 to tergite 5 (Figure 4C,D); the length of the post-bend section of vein M about 1.50 × as long as the length between the bend of vein M and crossvein r-m; wing margin with short, straight setae arranged irregularly (Figure 6C,D); body generally light-colored (Figure 2C,D) ………………………………………………………………………T. multipunctata
Figure 1. (AE) Habitus of Taxigramma spp., lateral view; (F) Proepisternum of T. pilicornis. (A) T. albina, female; (B) T. albina, male; (C) T. heteroneura, male; (D) T. pluton, male; (E,F) T. pilicornis, male; arrow showing proepisternal depression setose. Scale bars: (AE) 2 mm; (F) 0.2 mm.
Figure 1. (AE) Habitus of Taxigramma spp., lateral view; (F) Proepisternum of T. pilicornis. (A) T. albina, female; (B) T. albina, male; (C) T. heteroneura, male; (D) T. pluton, male; (E,F) T. pilicornis, male; arrow showing proepisternal depression setose. Scale bars: (AE) 2 mm; (F) 0.2 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g001
Figure 2. Habitus of Taxigramma spp., lateral view. (A) T. elegantula, male; (B) T. elegantula, female; (C) T. multipunctata, male; (D) T. multipunctata, female; (E) T. pluriseta, male; (F) T. pluriseta, female; (G) T. stictica, male; (H) T. stictica, female. Scale bars: (AH) 2 mm.
Figure 2. Habitus of Taxigramma spp., lateral view. (A) T. elegantula, male; (B) T. elegantula, female; (C) T. multipunctata, male; (D) T. multipunctata, female; (E) T. pluriseta, male; (F) T. pluriseta, female; (G) T. stictica, male; (H) T. stictica, female. Scale bars: (AH) 2 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g002
Figure 3. (AE) Abdomina of Taxigramma spp., dorsal view; (FH) fore tarsi of male Taxigramma spp., dorsal view; (I) claw of male T. heteroneura, dorsal view. (A) T. albina, female; (B) T. albina, male; (C) T. heteroneura, male; (D) T. pluton, male; (E) T. pilicornis, male; (F) T. albina, male, right fore leg; (G) T. elegantula, male, right fore leg; (H) T. pluriseta, male, right fore leg; (I) T. stictica, male, left fore leg; (J) T. heteroneura, male, right fore leg. Scale bars: (AE) 1 mm; (FJ) 0.2 mm.
Figure 3. (AE) Abdomina of Taxigramma spp., dorsal view; (FH) fore tarsi of male Taxigramma spp., dorsal view; (I) claw of male T. heteroneura, dorsal view. (A) T. albina, female; (B) T. albina, male; (C) T. heteroneura, male; (D) T. pluton, male; (E) T. pilicornis, male; (F) T. albina, male, right fore leg; (G) T. elegantula, male, right fore leg; (H) T. pluriseta, male, right fore leg; (I) T. stictica, male, left fore leg; (J) T. heteroneura, male, right fore leg. Scale bars: (AE) 1 mm; (FJ) 0.2 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g003
Figure 4. Abdomina of Taxigramma spp., dorsal view. (A) T. elegantula, male; (B) T. elegantula, female; (C) T. multipunctata, male; (D) T. multipunctata, female; (E) T. pluriseta, male; (F) T. pluriseta, female; (G) T. stictica, male; (H) T. stictica, female. Scale bars: (AH) 1 mm.
Figure 4. Abdomina of Taxigramma spp., dorsal view. (A) T. elegantula, male; (B) T. elegantula, female; (C) T. multipunctata, male; (D) T. multipunctata, female; (E) T. pluriseta, male; (F) T. pluriseta, female; (G) T. stictica, male; (H) T. stictica, female. Scale bars: (AH) 1 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g004
Figure 5. (AE) Wings of Taxigramma spp.; (FK) Aristae of Taxigramma spp., lateral view. (A) T. albina, female; (B) T. albina, male; (C) T. heteroneura, male; (D) T. pluton, male; (E) T. pilicornis, male; (F) T. albina, female; (G) T. albina, male; (H) T. pilicornis, male; (I) T. stictica, male; (J) T. pluriseta, male; (K) T. pluton, male. Scale bars: (AE) 1 mm; (FK) 0.2 mm.
Figure 5. (AE) Wings of Taxigramma spp.; (FK) Aristae of Taxigramma spp., lateral view. (A) T. albina, female; (B) T. albina, male; (C) T. heteroneura, male; (D) T. pluton, male; (E) T. pilicornis, male; (F) T. albina, female; (G) T. albina, male; (H) T. pilicornis, male; (I) T. stictica, male; (J) T. pluriseta, male; (K) T. pluton, male. Scale bars: (AE) 1 mm; (FK) 0.2 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g005
Figure 6. Wings of Taxigramma spp. (A) T. elegantula, male; (B) T. elegantula, female; (C) T. multipunctata, male; (D) T. multipunctata, female; (E) T. pluriseta, male; (F) T. pluriseta, female; (G) T. stictica, male; (H) T. stictica, female. Scale bars: (AH) 1 mm.
Figure 6. Wings of Taxigramma spp. (A) T. elegantula, male; (B) T. elegantula, female; (C) T. multipunctata, male; (D) T. multipunctata, female; (E) T. pluriseta, male; (F) T. pluriseta, female; (G) T. stictica, male; (H) T. stictica, female. Scale bars: (AH) 1 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g006
Figure 7. Heads of Taxigramma spp. (AC) T. albina, female; (DF) T. albina, male; (GI) T. heteroneura, male; (JL) T. pluton, male; (MO) T. pilicornis, male. (A,D,G,J,M) anterior view; (B,E,H,K,N) anterolateral view; (C,F,I,L,O) lateral view. Scale bars: (AO) 0.5 mm.
Figure 7. Heads of Taxigramma spp. (AC) T. albina, female; (DF) T. albina, male; (GI) T. heteroneura, male; (JL) T. pluton, male; (MO) T. pilicornis, male. (A,D,G,J,M) anterior view; (B,E,H,K,N) anterolateral view; (C,F,I,L,O) lateral view. Scale bars: (AO) 0.5 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g007
Figure 8. Heads of Taxigramma spp. (AC) T. elegantula, male; (DF) T. elegantula, female; (GI) T. multipunctata, male; (JL) T. multipunctata, female. (A,D,G,J) anterior view; (B,E,H,K) anterolateral view; (C,F,I,L) lateral view. Scale bars: (AL) 0.5 mm.
Figure 8. Heads of Taxigramma spp. (AC) T. elegantula, male; (DF) T. elegantula, female; (GI) T. multipunctata, male; (JL) T. multipunctata, female. (A,D,G,J) anterior view; (B,E,H,K) anterolateral view; (C,F,I,L) lateral view. Scale bars: (AL) 0.5 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g008
Figure 9. Heads of Taxigramma spp. (AC) T. pluriseta, male; (DF) T. pluriseta, female; (GI) T. stictica, male; (JL) T. stictica, female. (A,D,G,J) anterior view; (B,E,H,K) anterolateral view; (C,F,I,L) lateral view. Scale bars: (AL) 0.5 mm.
Figure 9. Heads of Taxigramma spp. (AC) T. pluriseta, male; (DF) T. pluriseta, female; (GI) T. stictica, male; (JL) T. stictica, female. (A,D,G,J) anterior view; (B,E,H,K) anterolateral view; (C,F,I,L) lateral view. Scale bars: (AL) 0.5 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g009
Figure 10. Terminalia of T. albina. (A) Terminalia, male, lateral view. (B) Sternite 5, male, ventral view. (C) Sternites 1−6, female, ventral view. (D) Terminalia, female, ventral view. (E) Spermathecae. Scale bars: (A,B,D,E) 0.1 mm; (C) 0.4 mm.
Figure 10. Terminalia of T. albina. (A) Terminalia, male, lateral view. (B) Sternite 5, male, ventral view. (C) Sternites 1−6, female, ventral view. (D) Terminalia, female, ventral view. (E) Spermathecae. Scale bars: (A,B,D,E) 0.1 mm; (C) 0.4 mm.
Insects 16 00953 g010

3.3. Genetic Distance Analysis

A total of 20 COI sequences were successfully obtained, representing the following species: T. elegantula (n = 5), T. multipunctata (n = 4), T. heteroneura (n = 3), T. hilarella (n = 2), T. stictica (n = 2), T. albina (n = 1), T. pluton (n = 1), T. pluriseta (n = 1) and T. pilicornis (n = 1).
Analysis of pairwise K2P genetic distances based on COI sequences among Taxigramma species is presented in Table 3. Maximum intraspecific K2P distances within Taxigramma were ≤2.94%, falling below the standard animal COI barcoding threshold of 3%. Species-level maximum intraspecific distances were: T. elegantula (2.94%), T. multipunctata (1.04%), T. heteroneura (0.77%), T. hilarella (0.34%) and T. stictica (0%). We found no genetic divergence (K2P = 0%) between the Sichuan (ecotone) and Hainan (Oriental) populations of T. multipunctata. In contrast, both of these populations from southern China exhibited a genetic distance of 0.78% to the population from Xinjiang (Palearctic).
Minimum interspecific K2P distance was 3.75% (between T. elegantula and T. hilarella), while the maximum was 15.10% (between T. pilicornis and T. stictica). A distinct barcoding gap of 0.81% was observed, with no overlap between intra- and interspecific genetic distances. These results strongly support the utility of the COI gene for species identification within Taxigramma.
Table 3. Pairwise K2P genetic distances (%) based on COI sequences among Taxigramma species.
Table 3. Pairwise K2P genetic distances (%) based on COI sequences among Taxigramma species.
1234567891011121314151617181920
1T. albina (PX133180)
2T. elegantula (KY749760)6.16
3T. elegantula (MZ623189)5.830.17
4T. elegantula (MZ623596)5.660.340.31
5T. elegantula (MZ627095)5.301.020.920.92
6T. elegantula (PX133185)6.442.282.942.521.67
7T. heteroneura (KY749761)11.3311.6411.4411.6611.0410.80
8T. heteroneura (MN411060)10.6211.6410.9510.9610.428.720.00
9T. heteroneura (PX133184)12.2913.4213.1913.1912.9614.970.770.77
10T. hilarella (KY749762)5.584.534.354.533.994.6110.2710.2712.05
11T. hilarella (MZ628314)5.144.174.234.243.754.2310.089.3811.830.34
12T. multipunctata (KY749763)10.6910.4810.2810.499.8910.166.336.337.258.748.55
13T. multipunctata (PX133186)7.759.329.058.628.629.187.047.338.917.596.901.04
14T. multipunctata (PX133187)6.908.748.187.757.758.266.466.488.187.036.060.520.78
15T. multipunctata (PX133188)6.908.748.187.757.758.266.466.488.187.036.060.520.780.00
16T. pilicornis (KY749727)13.1011.8711.6611.8811.8513.4913.0613.0614.6112.4912.2912.2612.9613.5913.59
17T. pluriseta (PX133182)11.9614.7113.3713.1713.1713.5012.9012.3814.0414.2613.3810.6710.8310.3910.3913.59
18T. pluton (PX133181)8.889.509.108.888.659.168.518.239.0910.008.887.037.266.376.3713.4211.61
19T. stictica (KY749764)8.618.007.818.017.4312.7611.2411.2412.966.696.329.8910.509.909.9013.8813.8010.00
20T. stictica (PX133183)8.118.928.658.478.0911.5412.5711.7113.657.456.8011.0410.389.499.4915.1012.579.330.00
Figure 11. NJ tree of Taxigramma species based on the COI gene.
Figure 11. NJ tree of Taxigramma species based on the COI gene.
Insects 16 00953 g011
Furthermore, the NJ tree based on COI sequences demonstrates robust support for the monophyly of T. multipunctata, T. elegantula, T. heteroneura, T. hilarella and T. stictica, with bootstrap values of 93%, 95%, 100%, 100% and 100% respectively (see Figure 11). However, significant length heterogeneity among COI sequences may introduce sampling error in genetic distance estimation for short-sequence specimens, reduced branch support metrics.
Collectively, the combination of low intraspecific genetic distances (ranging from 0% to 2.94% in the species studied) and the highly supported monophyly of all species in the NJ tree strongly supports the utility of the COI gene as an effective molecular marker for species identification within the Taxigramma. Although observed length heterogeneity in some sequences may introduce sampling error, it does not appear to compromise the overall resolution at the species level, as evidenced by the high bootstrap values.

4. Discussion

In taxonomic studies of the genus Taxigramma, easily observable features of the external morphology including details of head, wing, chaetotaxy and abdomen (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9) as well as more complex details of the terminalia (Figure 10) are treated as critical diagnostic characteristics [5,6,8,16,17,18,26,27]. Pape [1] and Szpila [28] also noted that the proepisternal depression of T. pilicornis is setose, which not only serves as a reliable diagnostic character for distinguishing it from other Taxigramma species but also represents an exceptionally rare morphological characteristic within the Sarcophagidae. We additionally observed that certain species [e.g., T. albina, T. elegantula, T. pluriseta and T. stictica] possess distinctive hair-like setal structures on male fore tarsus, which appear to have diagnostic value for taxonomic identification.
Several researchers have recently conducted a series of studies on Taxigramma employing molecular data [2,14,15] and the morphology of first-instar larvae [29], leading to both refinement of its taxonomic system and proposal of novel diagnostic characteristics. Our research provides additional molecular data, and based on genetic distance analysis, we demonstrate the critical role of COI sequences in species identification (Figure 11), further highlighting the significance of integrating morphological characteristics with molecular evidence in taxonomic research.
The vast majority of Taxigramma species exhibit a Palaearctic–Afrotropical distribution pattern, with only a few species extending into the Nearctic and Oriental regions [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,16,18,26,27,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In China, most species of Taxigramma are primarily restricted to deserts, grassland and Gobi areas in the northern and northwestern regions [1,3,5,6,7,8]. Notably, this study provides the first record of T. multipunctata within the Oriental part of China in Hainan and Yunnan provinces. An analysis of intraspecific genetic distances from specimens collected in Xinjiang, Sichuan, and Yunnan showed no significant differences. Further analysis should be carried out by obtaining longer sequences.
All new country records reported by the present research are from Xinjiang, which is one of the regions exhibiting the highest diversity of Miltogramminae in China [8]. Among these, Turpan-Hami Basin and Kalamaili are particularly representative. Their typical desert and semi-desert habitats make this region a critical site for research on the subfamily Miltogramminae (Figure 12).

5. Conclusions

This study provides the first review of the genus Taxigramma from China, including an updated identification key with the two newly recorded species, T. pluriseta and T. pluton. Detailed information is given on the distribution in China for all eight species of Taxigramma, including the first record of T. multipunctata from the Oriental part. Examined specimens are listed and the first description of the male T. albina is provided as well as the first COI sequences for T. multipunctata, T. pluriseta and T. pluton. The species T. karakulensis could not be confirmed from China and is omitted from the checklist.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Z.; methodology, D.Z., K.S. and T.P.; software, Y.G., X.C., H.L. and Y.F.; validation, Z.L., D.Z., T.P. and K.S.; formal analysis, Z.L., Y.G., X.C. and H.L.; investigation, Z.L. and Y.F.; resources, D.Z., X.C. and Y.F.; data curation, X.C. and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L., Y.G. and H.L.; writing—review and editing, D.Z., K.S. and T.P.; visualization, D.Z.; supervision, D.Z.; project administration, D.Z.; funding acquisition, D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program (Grant No. 2022xjkk1200), the Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (Grant No. 2022FY202100) and the High-End Foreign Expert Recruitment Program (Grant No. G2023109008L).

Data Availability Statement

All data produced during this research are included in this publication and can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Laboratory of Animal Morphology and Systematic Classification, School of Entomology and Natural Reserve, Beijing Forestry University for providing research facilities, Shenyang Normal University and Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for enabling specimen access. We sincerely appreciate Liping Yan’s invaluable contributions to the molecular biology aspects of this study. Appreciation is likewise extended to Zhichao Zhou, Jin Shang and all collectors mentioned in this study for their contributions, as well as all reviewers for their constructive comments on our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BFUBeijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
IZCASInstitute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
SYNUShenyang Normal University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

References

  1. Pape, T. Catalogue of the Sarcophagidae of the World (Insecta: Diptera). Mem. Entomol. Int. 1996, 8, 1–558. [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnston, N.P.; Pape, T.; Piwczyński, M.; Wallman, J.F.; Wiegmann, B.M.; Cassel, B.K.; Akbarzadeh, K.; Szpila, K. Anchored phylogenomics and revised classification of the Miltogramminae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Syst. Entomol. 2023, 49, 138–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Verves, Y.G. An annotated list of Chinese Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Bol. Asoc. Esp. Entomol. 2020, 1, 1–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Verves, Y.G.; Barták, M.; Kubík, Š. Checklist of flesh flies of Turkey (Diptera, Sarcophagidae). ZooKeys 2018, 743, 95–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fan, Z.D. Key to the Common Flies of China, 2nd ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1992; 992p, (In Chinese with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  6. Xue, W.Q.; Chao, C.M. Flies of China, 2nd ed.; Liaoning Science and Technology Press: Shenyang, China, 1998; pp. 1518–1660, (In Chinese with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  7. Fan, Z.D.; Pape, T. Checklist of Sarcophagidae (Diptera) recorded from China. Stud. Dipterol. 1996, 3, 237–258. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, M.; Xu, W.T.; Pape, T.; Pei, W.Y.; Zhang, D. Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) of Kalamaili Mountain Ungulate Nature Reserve (China: Xinjiang): Checklist and description of four new species. Zootaxa 2021, 5063, 1–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cumming, J.M.; Wood, D.M. Adult morphology and terminology. In Manual of Afrotropical Diptera. Introductory Chapters and Keys to Diptera Families. Suricata 4; Kirk–Spriggs, A.H., Sinclair, B.J., Eds.; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2017; Volume 1, pp. 89–133. [Google Scholar]
  10. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  11. Truett, G.E.; Heeger, P.; Mynatt, R.L.; Truett, A.A.; Walker, J.A.; Warman, M.L. Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic DNA with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT). BioTechniques 2000, 29, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger da-tasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Piwczyński, M.; Pape, T.; Deja-Sikora, E.; Sikora, M.; Akbarzadeh, K.; Szpila, K. Molecular phylogeny of Miltogramminae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae): Implications for classification, systematics and evolution of larval feeding strategies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2017, 116, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Roslin, T.; Somervuo, P.; Pentinsaari, M.; Hebert, P.D.N.; Agda, J.; Ahlroth, P.; Anttonen, P.; Aspi, J.; Blagoev, G.; Blanco, S.; et al. A molecular-based identification resource for the arthropods of Finland. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2022, 22, 803–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rohdendorf, B.B. Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region. Familie 64 h: Sarcophaginae; Lindner, E., Ed.; E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung: Stuttgart, Germany, 1935; pp. 49–129. [Google Scholar]
  17. Richet, R.; Verves, Y.G.; Whitmore, D.; Pape, T. Revision of Taxigramma pseudaperta Séguy, 1941 and comparisons with sympatric T. multipunctata (Rondani, 1859) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Zootaxa 2013, 3731, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pape, T. The Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomol. Scand. 1987, 19, 1–203. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zetterstedt, J.W. Diptera Scandinaviae Disposita et Descripta. Tomus 3; Officina Lundbergiana: Lund, Sweden, 1844; pp. 895–1280. [Google Scholar]
  20. Meigen, J.W. Systematische Beschreibung der Bekannten Europäischen Zweiflügeligen Insekten. Sechster Theil; Schulz-Wundermann: Hamm, Germany, 1830; xii + 401pp. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rondani, C. Dipterologicae Italicae Prodromus. III. Species Italicae Ordinis Dipterorum in Genera Characteribus Definita, Ordinaturium Collectae, Methodo Analitica Distinctae, et Novis vel Minus Cognitis Descriptis. Pars Secunda. Muscidae Siphoninae et (Partim) Tachininae; Ex Tipographia A. Stocchii: Parma, Italy, 1859; 243p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pandellé, L. Études sur les muscides de France. IIe partie (suite). Rev. Fr. Entomol. 1895, 14, 287–351. [Google Scholar]
  23. Povolny, D.; Verves, Y. The flesh–flies of Central Europe (Insecta, Diptera, Sarcophagidae). Spix. Suppl. 1997, 24, 1–264. [Google Scholar]
  24. Séguy, E. Études sur les mouches parasites. 2. Calliphorides, calliphorines (suite), sarcophagines et rhinophorides de l’Europe occidentale et méridionale. Encycl. Entomol. Paris Ser. A 1941, 21, 436. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cerretti, P.; Pape, T. Metopodia pilicornis (Pandellé, 1895) kleptoparasitic on Sphex funerarius Gussakovskij, 1934 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae, Miltogramminae; Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Stud. Dipterol. 2004, 10, 557–558. [Google Scholar]
  26. Verves, Y.G. On the fauna of Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of the Mongolian People’s Republic. V. New data on sarcophagids from Mongolia and neighboring territories. Insects Mong. 1984, 9, 527–561. [Google Scholar]
  27. Verves, Y.G. A key to Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Mongolia, Siberia and neighboring territories. Insects Mong. 1990, 11, 516–616, (In Russian with English Subtitle). [Google Scholar]
  28. Szpila, K. Metopodia pilicornis (Pandelle, 1895) (Diptera, Sarcophagidae)–gatunek nowy dla fauny Polski. Dipteron 2013, 29, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  29. Szpila, K.; Pape, T. Morphology of the first instar larvae of two species of Taxigramma PERRIS, 1852 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae: Miltogramminae). Pol. J. Entomol. 2013, 82, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Szpila, K. Miltogramminae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) Torunia. Dipteron 2009, 25, 57–70. [Google Scholar]
  31. Krčmar, S.; Whitmore, D.; Pape, T.; Buenaventura, E. Checklist of the Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Croatia, with new records from Croatia and other Mediterranean countries. ZooKeys 2019, 831, 95–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Verves, Y.G. A checklist of Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of the Ukraine and Moldavia. Entomol. Rev. 1992, 71, 129–132. [Google Scholar]
  33. Verves, Y.G.; Khrokalo, L.A. An annotated list of the Sarcophagidae (Macronychiinae, Miltogramminae, Eumacronychiinae and Paramacronychiinae) recorded in Ukraine (Diptera). CESA News 2014, 95, 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  34. Verves, Y.G.; Khrokalo, L. The Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of the Middle East. Zool. Middle East 2018, 64, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Verves, Y.; Barták, M. New distributional data and an updated and commented list of Czech and Slovak Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Ann. Soc. Èntomol. Fr. 2018, 54, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barták, M.; Khrokalo, L.; Verves, Y.G. New records, synonyms and combinations for oriental Sarcophagidae (Diptera), with updated checklists for Cambodia, India, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2019, 22, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 12. Geographical distribution of Taxigramma species from China.
Figure 12. Geographical distribution of Taxigramma species from China.
Insects 16 00953 g012
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
PrimerForward/ReverseSequence
LCO1490Forward5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′
HCO2198Reverse5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′
miniBarcode-FForward5′-GGWACWGGWTGAACWGTWTAYCCYCC-3′
miniBarcode-RReverse5′-TANACYTCNGGRTGNCCRAARAAYCA-3′
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Gai, Y.; Cheng, X.; Li, H.; Fan, Y.; Szpila, K.; Pape, T.; Zhang, D. Taxonomic Review of the Genus Taxigramma (Diptera, Sarcophagidae, Miltogramminae) from China. Insects 2025, 16, 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090953

AMA Style

Liu Z, Gai Y, Cheng X, Li H, Fan Y, Szpila K, Pape T, Zhang D. Taxonomic Review of the Genus Taxigramma (Diptera, Sarcophagidae, Miltogramminae) from China. Insects. 2025; 16(9):953. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090953

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zijun, Yi Gai, Xiaolan Cheng, Hanqing Li, Yaqian Fan, Krzysztof Szpila, Thomas Pape, and Dong Zhang. 2025. "Taxonomic Review of the Genus Taxigramma (Diptera, Sarcophagidae, Miltogramminae) from China" Insects 16, no. 9: 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090953

APA Style

Liu, Z., Gai, Y., Cheng, X., Li, H., Fan, Y., Szpila, K., Pape, T., & Zhang, D. (2025). Taxonomic Review of the Genus Taxigramma (Diptera, Sarcophagidae, Miltogramminae) from China. Insects, 16(9), 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090953

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop