Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Hydromorphological Alterations on Mayfly Assemblages of a Mid-Sized Lowland River in South-Eastern Europe
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Quality of Spray Application in IRS: Evaluation of the Micron Track Sprayer
Previous Article in Journal
The Insecticidal Efficacy and Physiological Action Mechanism of a Novel Agent GC16 against Tetranychus pueraricola (Acari: Tetranychidae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Practical Insecticide Resistance Monitoring Bioassay for Orally Ingested Dinotefuran in Anopheles Malaria Vectors
 
 
Guidelines
Peer-Review Record

Strain Characterisation for Measuring Bioefficacy of ITNs Treated with Two Active Ingredients (Dual-AI ITNs): Developing a Robust Protocol by Building Consensus

Insects 2022, 13(5), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13050434
by Rosemary S. Lees 1,2,*, Jennifer S. Armistead 3, Salum Azizi 4, Edi Constant 5, Christen Fornadel 6, John E. Gimnig 7, Janet Hemingway 1, Daniel Impoinvil 7,8, Seth R. Irish 8, William Kisinza 9, Natalie Lissenden 1,2, Henry D. Mawejje 10, Louisa A. Messenger 11, Sarah Moore 12,13,14,15, Corine Ngufor 11,16, Richard Oxborough 17, Natacha Protopopoff 11, Hilary Ranson 1, Graham Small 6, Joseph Wagman 18, David Weetman 1, Sarah Zohdy 7,8 and Angus Spiers 2add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Insects 2022, 13(5), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13050434
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 22 April 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insecticides for Mosquito Control: Strengthening the Evidence Base)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript brings an important contribution to the standardization for durability monitoring of ITNs containing pyrethroid and a second AI. The possible approaches presented are frequently discussed by Malaria Control Programs Teams and the publication of this paper will contribute to improve quality of bioefficacy tests.

My only recommendation is to review abbreviations that are not spelled out in full in the first citation. See lines 82, 186, 647 and 651.

Author Response

The authors would like to thank the Reviewer for their kind words, and are very pleased to hear that they think this is a useful contribution. 

We have checked the use of abbreviations throughout the manuscript, and corrected those specific examples highlighted.

Reviewer 2 Report

There have been very few times in my life when I have recommended acceptance as submitted.  This is one of them.  The authors seem to have covered all of the bases and every eventuality.  I only hope that their suggestions fall on receptive ears.

Author Response

The authors would like to thank this Reviewer for their very kind words, and share their hope that this will be a useful resource for the community.

Back to TopTop