Tribology of Natural Fibers Composite Materials: An Overview
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Tribology in NFRCs
- The dynamic properties of the system and stiffness of the contact are determined by the relationship between the normal body displacement and the normal force; and
- In the contact area, stresses occur.
3. Friction and Wear of NFRCs
3.1. Kenaf Fiber NFRCs
3.2. Jute Fiber NFRCs
3.3. Oil Palm Fiber NFRCs
3.4. Coir Fiber NFRCs
3.5. Friction and Wear Behavior of Natural Fiber-Based vs. Synthetic Fiber-Based Composites
4. Conclusions
- Definition of suitable friction and wear measurement protocols accounting for the orientation of fibers in the matrix with respect to the sliding motion, characteristic of each adopted tribological test;
- Investigations on the effects of fiber treatment, fiber orientation, and fiber volume fraction, at various loads and temperatures, on tribological properties of NFRCs; and
- Tribological characterization of novel combinations of green matrix/fiber type both in dry and lubricated conditions.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Torabinejad, V.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Assareh, S.; Allahyarzadeh, M.H.; Sabour, A. Rouhaghdam. Electrodeposition of Ni-Fe alloys, composites, and nano coatings—A review. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 691, 841–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmberg, K.; Erdemir, A. Influence of tribology on global energy consumption, costs and emissions. Friction 2017, 5, 263–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmberg, K.; Kivikytö-Reponen, P.; Härkisaari, P.; Valtonen, K.; Erdemir, A. Global energy consumption due to friction and wear in the mining industry. Tribol. Int. 2017, 115, 116–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhushan, B. Introduction to Tribology, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 1–201. [Google Scholar]
- Staab, G.H. Laminar Composites, 2nd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier): Oxford, UK, 2015; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Pachta, V.; Stefanidou, M.; Konopisi, S.; Papayianni, I. Technological evolution of historic structural mortars. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 2014, 8, 846–854. [Google Scholar]
- Thiroumalini, P.; Sekar, S.K. Review on herbs used as admixture in lime mortar used in ancient structures. Indian J. Appl. Res. 2013, 3, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nägeli, C.; Camarasa, C.; Jakob, M.; Catenazzi, G.; Ostermeyer, Y. Synthetic building stocks as a way to assess the energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions of national building stocks. Energy Build. 2018, 173, 443–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dente, S.M.R.; Aoki-Suzuki, C.; Tanaka, D.; Hashimoto, S. Revealing the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of materials: The Japanese case. Resourc. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 133, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahinur, S.; Hasan, M. Natural fiber and synthetic fiber composites: Comparison of properties, performance, cost and environmental benefits. Ref. Modul. Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanal, I.; Verma, D. Construction Materials Reinforced with Natural Products. In Handbook of Ecomaterials; Martínez, L.M.T., Kharissova, O.V., Kharisov, B.I., Eds.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Saxena, M.; Pappu, A.; Sharma, A.; Haque, R.; Wankhede, S. Composite Materials from Natural Resources: Recent Trends and Future Potentials. In Advances in Composite Materials—Analysis of Natural and ManMade Materials; Tesinova, P., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 121–163. [Google Scholar]
- Satyanarayana, K.G.; Arizaga, G.G.C.; Wypych, F. Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers—An overview. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 982–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balla, V.K.; Kate, K.H.; Satyavolu, J.; Singh, P.; Tadimeti, J.G.D. Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 174, 106956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elanchezhian, C.; Ramnath, B.V.; Ramakrishnan, G.; Rajendrakumar, M.; Naveenkumar, V.; Saravanakumar, M.K. Review on mechanical properties of natural fiber composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 1785–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruggiero, A.; Valášek, P.; Müller, M. Exploitation of waste date seeds of Phoenix dactylifera in form of polymeric particle biocomposite: Investigation on adhesion, cohesion and wear. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 104, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saheb, D.N.; Jog, J.P. Natural fiber polymer composites: A review. Adv. Polym. Technol. 1999, 18, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popov, V.L. Qualitative Treatment of Contact Problems—Normal Contact without Adhesion. In Contact Mechanics and Friction, Physical Principles and Applications, 2nd ed.; Popov, V.L., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 9–23. [Google Scholar]
- Popov, V.L.; Heβ, M.; Willert, E. Handbook of Contact Mechanics, Exact Solutions of Axisymmetric Contact Problems, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 5–66. [Google Scholar]
- D’Agostino, V. Fondamenti di Meccanica Applicata alle Macchine, 3rd ed.; Maggioli Editore: Rimini, Italy, 2013; pp. 124–138. [Google Scholar]
- Rahnejat, H. An introduction to multi-physics multi-scale approach. In Tribology and Dynamics of Engine and Powertrain, Fundamentals, Applications and Future Trends, 1st ed.; Rahnejat, H., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2010; pp. 3–38. [Google Scholar]
- Rahnejat, H.; Johns-Rahnejat, P.M. Mechanics of contacting surfaces. In Encyclopedia of Automotive Engineering; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Boucly, V.; Nélias, D.; Liu, S.; Wang, Q.J.; Keer, L.M. Contact analyses for bodies with frictional heating and plastic behavior. J. Tribol. 2005, 127, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yevtushenko, A.A.; Kuciej, M. One-dimensional thermal problem of friction during braking: The history of development and actual state. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 55, 4148–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.R.; Guo, Y.B. Finite element analysis of the effect of sequential cuts and tool–chip friction on residual stresses in a machined layer. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2000, 42, 1069–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassani, R.; Levita, G.; Meozzi, M.; Palla, G. Friction and wear of epoxy resin on inox steel: Remarks on the influence of velocity, load and induced thermal state. Wear 2001, 247, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Páczelt, I.; Mróz, Z. Variational approach to the analysis of steady-state thermo-elastic wear regimes. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2009, 81, 728–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.C.; Ashby, M.F. Overview No. 55 Wear-Mechanism maps. Acta Metall. 1987, 35, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiri, M.; Khonsari, M.M. On the thermodynamics of friction and wear―A review. Entropy 2010, 12, 1021–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chin, C.W.; Yousif, B.F. Potential of kenaf fibres as reinforcement for tribological applications. Wear 2009, 267, 1550–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yallew, T.B.; Kumar, P.; Singh, I. Sliding wear properties of jute fabric reinforced polypropylene composites. Procedia Eng. 2014, 97, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nirmal, U.; Yousif, B.F.; Rilling, D.; Brevern, P.V. Effect of betelnut fibres treatment and contact conditions on adhesive wear and frictional performance of polyester composites. Wear 2010, 268, 1354–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goriparthi, B.K.; Suman, K.N.S.; Rao, N.M. Effect of fiber surface treatments on mechanical and abrasive wear performance of polylactide/jute composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 1800–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raghavendra, G.; Ojha, S.; Acharya, S.K.; Pal, S.K. Jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites and comparison with the glass and neat epoxy composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2013, 48, 2537–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuhimi, F.F.; Abdollah, M.F.B.; Kalam, M.A.; Hassan, M.; Mustafa, A.; Amiruddin, H. Tribological characteristics comparison for oil palm fibre/epoxy and kenaf fibre/epoxy composites under dry sliding conditions. Tribol. Int. 2016, 101, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousif, B.F.; Tayeb, E.N.S.M. The effect of oil palm fibers as reinforcement on tribological performance of polyester composite. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2007, 14, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.N.; Li, S.Z.; Zhang, R.H.; Li, S. Effect of fiber orientation on a graphite fiber composite in single pendulum scratching. Wear 1996, 198, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xess, P.A. Erosion Wear Behaviour of Bamboo Fiber Based Hybrid Composites. Master’s Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India, May 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Alves, C.; Ferrão, P.M.C.; Silva, A.J.; Reis, L.G.; Freitas, M.; Rodrigues, L.B.; Alves, D.E. Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Tembleque, L.; Aliabadi, M.H. Friction and wear modelling in fiber-reinforced composites. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2014, 102, 183–210. [Google Scholar]
- Din, I.U.; Panier, S.; Hao, P.; Franz, G.; Bijwe, J.; Hui, L. Finite element modeling of indentation and adhesive wear in sliding of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic polymer against metallic counterpart. Tribol. Int. 2019, 135, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, M.; Wang, K.K. Fiber orientation and mechanical properties of short-fiber-reinforced injection-molded composites: Simulated and experimental results. Polym. Compos. 1993, 14, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nak-Ho, S.; Suh, N.P. Effect of fiber orientation on friction and wear of fiber reinforced polymeric composites. Wear 1979, 53, 129–141. [Google Scholar]
- Alshammari, F.Z.; Saleh, K.H.; Yousif, B.F.; Alajmi, A.; Shalwan, A.; Alotaibi, J.G. the influence of fibre orientation on tribological performance of jute fibre reinforced epoxy composites considering different mat orientations. Tribol. Ind. 2018, 40, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- El-Tayeb, N.S.M. A study on the potential of sugarcane fibers/polyester composite for tribological applications. Wear 2008, 265, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stachowiak, G.W.; Batchelor, A.W.; Stachowiak, G.B. Experimental Methods in Tribology, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 25–78. [Google Scholar]
- Liguori, C.; Ruggiero, A.; Russo, D.; Sommella, P. A statistical approach for improving the accuracy of dry friction coefficient measurement. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2019, 68, 1412–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mang, T.; Dresel, W. Lubricants and Lubrication, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007; pp. 737–739. [Google Scholar]
- Lanza, A.; Ruggiero, A.; Sbordone, L. Tribology and dentistry: A commentary. Lubricants 2019, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Alwani, M.S.; Ridzuan, R.; Kamarudin, H.; Khairul, A. Chemical composition, morphological characteristics, and cell wall structure of Malaysian oil palm fibres. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2008, 47, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousif, B.F.; El-Tayeb, N.S.M. Adhesive wear performance of T-OPRP and UT-OPRP composites. Tribol. Lett. 2008, 32, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayrilmis, N.; Jarusombuti, S.; Fueangvivat, V.; Bauchongkol, P.; White, R.H. Coir Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene composite panel for automotive interior applications. Fibers Polym. 2011, 12, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shireesha, Y.; Nandipati, G. State of art review on natural fibers. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akil, H.M.; Omar, M.F.; Mazuki, A.A.M.; Safiee, S.; Ishak, Z.A.M.; Bakar, A.A. Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: A review. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4107–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zampaloni, M.; Pourboghrat, F.; Yankovich, S.A.; Rodgers, B.N.; Moore, J.; Drzal, L.T.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Kenaf natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: A discussion on manufacturing problems and solutions. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2007, 38, 1569–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordin, N.A.; Yussof, F.M.; Kasolang, S.; Salleh, Z.; Ahmad, M.A. Wear rate of natural fibre: Long kenaf composite. Procedia Eng. 2013, 68, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yousif, B.F.; Chin, C.W. Epoxy composite based on kenaf fibers for tribological applications under wet contact conditions. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2012, 19, 1250050-1–1250050-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Archard, J.F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 1953, 24, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edeerozey, A.M.M.; Akil, H.M.; Azhar, A.B.; Ariffin, M.I.Z. Chemical modification of kenaf fibers. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 2023–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serizawa, S.; Inoue, K.; Iji, M. Kenaf-fiber-reinforced poly (lactic acid) used for electronic products. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ochi, S. Mechanical properties of kenaf fibers and kenaf/PLA composites. Mech. Mater. 2008, 40, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Ramaswamy, G.N. One-step processing and bleaching of mechanically separated kenaf fibers: Effects on physical and chemical properties. Text. Res. J. 2003, 73, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saba, N.; Paridah, M.T.; Jawaid, M. Mechanical properties of kenaf fibre reinforced polymer composite: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 76, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komuraiah, A.; Kumar, N.S.; Prasad, B.D. Chemical composition of natural fibers and its influence on their mechanical properties. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2014, 50, 359–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Jawaid, M.; Hassan, A.; Paridah, M.T.; Zaidon, A. Oil palm biomass fibres and recent advancement in oil palm biomass fibres based hybrid biocomposites. In Composites and Their Applications; Hu, N., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 209–242. [Google Scholar]
- Mustafa, A.; Abdollah, M.F.B.; Shuhimi, F.F.; Ismail, N.; Amiruddin, H.; Umehara, N. Selection and verification of kenaf fibres as an alternative friction material using Weighted Decision Matrix method. Mater. Des. 2015, 67, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, C.W.; Yousif, F. Influence of particle size, applied load, and fibre orientation on 3B-A wear and frictional behaviour of epoxy composite based on kenaf fibres. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2010, 224, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narish, S.; Yousif, B.F.; Rilling, D. Adhesive wear of thermoplastic composite based on kenaf fibres. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2011, 225, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, K.V.; Kanny, K. The effect of treatment on kenaf fiber using green approach and their reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 104, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acha, B.A.; Marcovich, N.E.; Reboredo, M.M. Physical and mechanical characterization of jute fabric composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 98, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sayed, A.A.; El-Sherbiny, M.G.; Abo-El-Ezz, A.S.; Aggag, G.A. Friction and wear properties of polymeric composite materials for bearing applications. Wear 1995, 184, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chand, N.; Dwivedi, U.K. Effect of coupling agent on abrasive wear behaviour of chopped jute fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites. Wear 2006, 261, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, U.K.; Chand, N. Influence of fibre orientation on friction and sliding wear behaviour of jute fibre reinforced polyester composite. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2009, 16, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matějka, V.; Fu, Z.; Kukutschová, J.; Qi, S.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, X.; Yun, R.; Vaculík, M.; Heliová, M.; Lu, Y. Jute fibers and powderized hazelnut shells as natural fillers in non-asbestos organic non-metallic friction composites. Mater. Des. 2013, 51, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valášek, P.; Ruggiero, A.; Müller, M. Experimental description of strength and tribological characteristic of EFB oil palm fibres/epoxy composites with technologically undemanding preparation. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 122, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinoj, S.; Visvanathan, R.; Panigrahi, S.; Kochubabu, M. Oil palm fiber (OPF) and its composites: A review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirjosentono, B.; Guritno, P.; Ismail, H. Oil palm empty fruit bunch filled polypropylene composites. Int. J. Polym. Mater. 2004, 53, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozman, H.D.; Lai, C.Y.; Ismail, H.; Ishak, Z.A.M. The effect of coupling agents on the mechanical and physical properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch–polypropylene composites. Polym. Int. 2000, 49, 1273–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karina, M.; Onggo, H.; Abdullah, A.H.D.; Syampurwadi, A. Effect of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber on the physical and mechanical properties of fiber glass reinforced polyester resin. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 8, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Badri, K.H.; Othman, Z.B.; Razali, I.M. Mechanical properties of poyurethane composites from oil palm resources. Iran. Polym. J. 2005, 14, 441–448. [Google Scholar]
- Yousif, B.F.; El-Tayeb, N.S.M. High-stress three-body abrasive wear of treated and untreated oil palm fibre-reinforced polyester composites. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2008, 222, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haque, M.M.; Hasan, M.; Islam, M.S.; Ali, M.E. Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated palm and coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 4903–4906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Su, S.; Chouw, N. Microstructure, flexural properties and durability of coir fibre reinforced concrete beams externally strengthened with flax FRP composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 80, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeniyi, A.G.; Onifade, D.V.; Ighalo, J.O.; Adeoye, A.S. A review of coir fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 176, 107305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siakeng, R.; Jawaid, M.; Ariffin, H.; Salit, M.S. Effects of surface treatments on tensile, thermal and fibre-matrix bond strength of coir and pineapple leaf fibres with poly lactic acid. J. Bionic Eng. 2018, 15, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valášek, P.; D’Amato, R.; Müller, M.; Ruggiero, A. Mechanical properties and abrasive wear of white/brown coir epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 146, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D, V.K.; N, M.; Bongale, A.K. Fabrication and tribological investigation of Coconut coir/Banana fiber/Glass fiber reinforced hybrid polymer matrix composites—A Taguchi’s approach. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 105345. [Google Scholar]
- Yousif, B.F. Frictional and wear performance of polyester composites based on coir fibres. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2009, 223, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahem, R.A. Friction and wear behaviour of fibre/particles reinforced polyester composites. Int. J. Adv. Mater. Res. 2016, 2, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, A.; Ahmad, M.A.; Joshi, S.; Al Said, S.A.F. Abrasive wear behavior of chemically treated coir fibre filled epoxy polymer composites. Am. J. Mech. Eng. Autom. 2014, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Yousif, B.F.; El-Tayeb, N.S.M. Mechanical and wear properties of oil palm and glass fibres reinforced polyester composites. Int. J. Precis. Technol. 2009, 1, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samad, A.; Sinha, S.K. Mechanical, thermal and tribological characterization of a UHMWPE film reinforced with carbon nanotubes coated on steel. Tribol. Int. 2011, 44, 1932–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, A.S.; Ali, A.B.; Nesar, M. Evaluation of tribological properties of organo-clay reinforced UHMWPE nanocomposites. J. Tribol. 2017, 139, 012001-1–012001-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.B.; Mohammed, A.S.; Nesar, M. UHMWPE hybrid nanocomposites for improved tribological performance under dry and water lubricated sliding conditions. Tribol. Lett. 2017, 65, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aliyu, I.K.; Mohammed, A.S.; Al-Qutub, A. Tribological performance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene nanocomposites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Polym. Compos. 2018, 40, E1301–E1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashmi, S.A.R.; Dwivedi, U.K.; Chand, N. Graphite modified cotton fibre reinforced polyester composites under sliding wear conditions. Wear 2007, 262, 1426–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousif, B.F.; El-Tayeb, N.S.M. Tribological evaluations of polyester composites considering three orientations of CSM glass fibres using BOR machine. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2007, 14, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, M.K.; Srivastava, R.K. Tribological and dynamic mechanical analysis of epoxy based hybrid sisal/jute composite. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 2016, 23, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary, V.; Bajpai, P.K.; Maheshwari, S. An investigation on wear and dynamic mechanical behavior of jute/hemp/flax reinforced composites and its hybrids for tribological applications. Fibers Polym. 2018, 19, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eleiche, A.M.; Amin, G.M. The effect of unidirectional cotton fibre reinforcement on the friction and wear characteristics of polyester. Wear 1986, 112, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, C.H.C.; Madhusudan, S.; Raghavendra, G.; Rao, E.V. Investigation in to wear behavior of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composites with the taguchi method. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2012, 2, 371–374. [Google Scholar]
Fiber | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | Density (g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abaca | 400 | 12 | 3–10 | 1.50 |
Alfa | 350 | 22 | 5.80 | 0.89 |
Bagasse | 290 | 17 | – | 1.25 |
Bamboo | 140–230 | 11–17 | – | 0.60–1.10 |
Banana | 500 | 12 | 5.90 | 1.35 |
Coir | 175 | 4–6 | 30 | 1.20 |
Cotton | 287–597 | 5.50–12.60 | 7–8 | 1.50–1.60 |
Curaua | 500–1150 | 11.80 | 3.70–4.30 | 1.40 |
Date palm | 97–196 | 2.50–5.40 | 2.0–4.50 | 1.0–1.20 |
Flax | 345–1035 | 27.60 | 2.70–3.20 | 1.50 |
Hemp | 690 | 70 | 1.60 | 1.48 |
Henequen | 500 ± 70 | 13.20 ± 3.10 | 4.80 ± 1.10 | 1.20 |
Isora | 500–600 | – | 5–6 | 1.20–1.30 |
Jute | 393–773 | 26.50 | 1.50–1.80 | 1.30 |
Kenaf | 930 | 53 | 1.60 | – |
Nettle | 650 | 38 | 1.70 | – |
Oil palm | 248 | 3.20 | 25 | 0.70–1.55 |
Piassava | 134–143 | 1.07–4.59 | 21.90–7.80 | 1.40 |
Pineapple | 1.44 | 400–627 | 14.50 | 0.80–1.60 |
Ramie | 560 | 24.50 | 2.50 | 1.50 |
Sisal | 511–635 | 9.40–22.0 | 2.0–2.50 | 1.50 |
Aramid | 2700–4500 | 130 | 3.30–3.70 | 1.45 |
E–glass | 3400 | 72 | – | 2.50 |
Fiber | Cellulose (wt%) | Hemicellulose (wt%) | Ligning (wt%) | Pectin (wt%) | Waxes (wt%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abaca | 62.5 | 21 | 12 | 0.8 | 3 |
Alfa | 45.4 | 38.5 | 14.9 | - | 2 |
Bagasse | 37 | 21 | 22 | 10 | - |
Banana | 62.5 | 12.5 | 7.5 | 4 | - |
Bamboo | 34.5 | 20.5 | 26 | - | - |
Coir | 46 | 0.3 | 45 | 4 | - |
Cotton | 89 | 4 | 0.75 | 6 | 0.6 |
Curaua | 73.6 | 5 | 7.5 | - | - |
Flax | 70.5 | 16.5 | 2.5 | 0.9 | - |
Hemp | 81 | 20 | 4 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Henequen | 60 | 28 | 8 | - | 0.5 |
Isora | 74 | - | 23 | - | 1.09 |
Jute | 67 | 16 | 9 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
Kapok | 13.16 | - | - | - | - |
Kenaf | 53.5 | 21 | 17 | 2 | - |
Nettle | 86 | 10 | - | - | 4 |
Oil palm (EFB) | 36–65 | 22–30 | 18–25 | - | - |
Phormium | 67 | 30 | 11 | - | - |
Piassava | 28.6 | 25.8 | 45 | - | - |
Pineapple | 80.5 | 17.5 | 8.3 | 4 | - |
Ramie | 72 | 14 | 0.8 | 1.95 | - |
Sisal | 60 | 11.5 | 8 | 1.2 | - |
Sample | Fiber Orientation [°] | Fiber Content [wt %] | Modulus [Gpa] | Maximum Stress [Mpa] | Maximum Strain [mm/mm] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Matrix | - | 0 | 2.5 ± 0.04 | 111.4 ± 4.05 | 0.305 ± 0.070 |
Raw | 0 | 56 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 52.4 ± 1.0 | 0.041 ± 0.008 |
30 | 53 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 53.8 ± 6.1 | 0.045 ± 0.007 | |
45 | 56 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 57.4 ± 2.4 | 0.056 ± 0.005 | |
Acetone-washed | 0 | 54 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 66.8 ± 13.2 | 0.040 ± 0.010 |
30 | 53 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 70.9 ± 7.6 | 0.050 ± 0.010 | |
45 | 55 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 84.1 ± 1.7 | 0.060 ± 0.010 | |
Detergent-washed | 0 | 48 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 60.5 ± 4.2 | 0.050 ± 0.005 |
30 | 51 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 64.8 ± 5.3 | 0.052 ± 0.016 | |
45 | 46 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 63.0 ± 7.1 | 0.045 ± 0.005 |
Operating Parameters | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiber | Matrix | Applied Load (N) | Sliding Velocity (m/s) | Sliding Distance (km) | Wear Rate (mm3/Nm × 10−⁵) | COF | Source |
Kenaf | Epoxy | 30–100 | 1.10–3.90 | 0–5 | 0.15–2 | 0.52–0.68 | [30] |
Oil palm | Polyester | 30–100 | 1.70–3.90 | 0–5 | 35–60 | 0.60–0.92 | [36] |
Cotton | Polyester | 20–80 | 2.22 | 4 | 0.10–6 | 0.60–1 | [96] |
Sugarcane | Polyester | 20–80 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 5000–10,000 | 0.02–0.25 | [45] |
Glass | Polyester | 30–100 | 2.80–3.90 | 0–14 | 0.20–0.60 | 0.40–0.60 | [97] |
Carbon | Polyethylene | 4 | 1000–2500 1 | – | – | ≈0.16 | [92] |
Organoclay cloisite | Polyethylene | 30 | 0.682 | 0.0682 | ≈8–10 | ≈0.09–0.11 | [93] |
Operating Parameters | |
---|---|
Erodent | Silica sand |
Erodent size (µm) | 200 ± 50 |
Erodent shape | Angular |
Hardness of silica particles (HV) | 1420 ± 50 |
Impingement angle (α°) | 30, 45, 60, 90 |
Impact velocity (m/s) | 48 |
Erodent feed rate (gm/min) | 2 ± 0.5 |
Test temperature (°C) | 27 |
Nozzle to sample distance (mm) | 10 |
Publication | Fiber | Matrix | Method | Aim |
---|---|---|---|---|
C.W. Chin, B.F. Yousif (2009). Potential of kenaf fibres as reinforcement for tribological applications. Paper: Wear [30] | Kenaf | Liquid epoxy (DER 331) | A block-on-disk (BOD) configuration was used to study surface specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 20 mm) against a stainless steel counterface. At applied load (30–100 N), sliding distance (0–5 km), at room temperature (28 °C) and at different sliding velocity (1.1–3.9 m/s) the tests were conducted. | Investigation on the wear and friction performances of the epoxy at different wt% of kenaf fiber at different fiber orientation. |
Umar Nirmal, B.F. Yousif, Dirk Rilling, P.V. Brevern (2010). Effect of betelnut fibres treatment and contact conditions on adhesive wear and frictional performance of polyester composites. Paper: Wear [32] | Betelnut | Polyester | At a sliding speed of 2.8 m/s at a load of 5–200 N, using a block-on-disk configuration, the tests were conducted under dry and wet conditions at a sliding distance of 0–6.72 km. At a temperature of 40 °C for 24 h, after the test, all samples were dried in the oven. | The wear and friction performances under wet and dry contact conditions controlled by fiber orientation. |
B.F. Yousif, E.N.S.M. Tayeb (2007). The effect of oil palm fibers as reinforcement on tribological performance of polyester composite. Paper: Surface Review and Letters [36] | Oil palm | Polyester | In ambient conditions, friction-wear tests were conducted with different experimental parameters. The sliding distances of 0–5 km, sliding speed of 1.7, 2.8, and 3.9 m/s, and applied loads of 30, 50, 70, and 100 N are set up. Oil palm/polyester composite was tested against polished stainless steel counterface using pin-on-disk configuration. | Influence of oil palm fibers within the polyester on friction and wear characteristics in comparison with neat polyester. |
F.Z. Alshammari, K.H. Saleh, B.F. Yousif, A. Alajmi, A. Shalwan, J.G. Alotaibi (2018). The Influence of Fibre Orientation on Tribological Performance of Jute Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composites Considering Different Mat Orientations. Paper: Tribology in Industry [44] | Jute | Epoxy | Considering three different fiber orientations with respect to sliding direction, the tests were conducted at 3 m/s sliding velocity with 30 N of applied load using block-on-ring (BOR) configuration for a sliding period of 60 min which is about 10 km sliding distance. | Analysis of the fiber orientation influence on frictional and wear performances of jute/epoxy composite. |
Nor Amalina Nordin, Fauziah Md Yussof, Salmiah Kasolang, Zuraidah Salleh and Mohamad Ali Ahmad (2013). Wear Rate of Natural Fibre: Long Kenaf Composite; The Malaysian International Tribology Conference 2013 [56] | Kenaf | Epoxy and Polyester | At room temperature, the wear tests were conducted at a constant sliding speed of 1.4 m/s under dry conditions. An abrasion resistance tester (TR-600) is used with applied loads of 5–30 N. | Study of the specific wear rate behavior of kenaf/polyester and kenaf/epoxy composites. |
Ashafi’e Mustafa, Mohd Fadzli Bin Abdollah, Fairuz Fazillah Shuhimi, Nurhidayah Ismail, Hilmi Amiruddin, Noritsugu Umehara (2015). Selection and verification of kenaf fibres as an alternative friction material using Weighted Decision Matrix method. Paper: Materials & Design [66] | Kenaf, jute, ramie | - | Weighted decision matrix (WDM) approach. | Verification of kenaf fiber as a suitable filler of composite in the automotive industry. |
Vlastimil Matějka, Zhezhen Fu, Jana Kukutschová, Shicheng Qi, Shengling Jiang, Xiaoa Zhang, Rongping Yun, Miroslav Vaculík, Marie Heliová, Yafei Lu (2013). Jute fibers and powderized hazelnut shells as natural fillers in non-asbestos organic non-metallic friction composites. Paper: Materials & Design [74] | Jute fibers and hazelnut shells | Phenolic resin | Friction-wear chase test was performed based on SAEJ661 (Society of Automotive Engineers standard procedure). | Research on the non-asbestos organic friction composites filled by jute fibers and powdered hazelnut shells. |
Petr Valášek, Alessandro Ruggiero, Miroslav Müller (2017). Experimental description of strength and tribological characteristic of EFB oil palm fibres/epoxy composites with technologically undemanding preparation. Paper: Composites Part B: Engineering [75] | Oil palm | Epoxy | Chemically treated and non-treated fibers are tested with two-body abrasion tests using a rotating cylindrical drum. The drum was covered with cloth of the P120 and Al203 grain size. The chemically treated fibers were soaked into a 6% solution of NaOH. | Study of the tribo-mechanical properties of treated and non-treated oil palm fibers with different experimental parameters. |
Gupta, M K, Srivastava, R K (2016). Tribological and dynamic mechanical analysis of epoxy based hybrid sisal/jute composite. Paper: Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences [98] | Sisal and jute | Epoxy | Based on the ASTM G99-95 standard, a wear test is performed. With a normal load of 10–30 N, sliding speed of 1–3 m/s, using pin-on-disk configuration (ground hardened steel disk), with sliding distance 1000–3000 m, test has conducted. | Tribo-mechanical analysis considering alkali treatment of fibers. |
Vijay Chaudhary, Pramendra Kumar Bajpai, Sachin Maheshwari (2018). An Investigation on Wear and Dynamic Mechanical behavior of Jute/Hemp/Flax Reinforced Composites and Its Hybrids for Tribological Applications. Paper: Fibers and Polymers [99] | Jute, hemp and flax | Epoxy | With a Pin-On-Disk tribometer wear test is conducted. The test conditions were set up on 1–5 m/s sliding speed, 10–50 N applied load and 1000–2000 m sliding distance. | Investigation on friction and wear improvement of natural fiber-reinforced composites in comparison to neat epoxy polymer. |
A.M. Eleiche, G.M. Amin (1986). The effect of unidirectional cotton fibre reinforcement on the friction and wear characteristics of polyester. Paper: Wear [100] | Cotton | Polyester | At an ambient temperature of about 22 °C, the tests were performing with pin-on-disk configuration under dry conditions. The specimens were tested against stainless steel disk under a normal load of 50 N. Using the Lancaster method, computed velocity below and above the pressure-velocity limit of pure polyester, equivalent to 10 and 32 cm s−1 sliding speed. | Study of the wear rate and friction coefficient of cotton/polyester composite against stainless steel. |
C.H. Chandra Rao, S. Madhusudan, G. Raghavendra, E. Venkateswara Rao (2012). Investigation in to Wear behavior of coir Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites with the Taguchi Method. Paper: International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications [101] | Coir | Epoxy | With a different running speed, the two-body abrasion wear tests were conducted using pin-on-disk configuration. The waterproof silicon carbide abrasive papers of 320 grit were used against polished samples with 32 mm length and 10 mm diameter. | Study of the wear resistance of treated and untreated coir dust/epoxy composites. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Milosevic, M.; Valášek, P.; Ruggiero, A. Tribology of Natural Fibers Composite Materials: An Overview. Lubricants 2020, 8, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants8040042
Milosevic M, Valášek P, Ruggiero A. Tribology of Natural Fibers Composite Materials: An Overview. Lubricants. 2020; 8(4):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants8040042
Chicago/Turabian StyleMilosevic, Marko, Petr Valášek, and Alessandro Ruggiero. 2020. "Tribology of Natural Fibers Composite Materials: An Overview" Lubricants 8, no. 4: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants8040042
APA StyleMilosevic, M., Valášek, P., & Ruggiero, A. (2020). Tribology of Natural Fibers Composite Materials: An Overview. Lubricants, 8(4), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants8040042