Next Article in Journal
Influence of Engine Oils on Pre-Ignition Tendency in a Hydrogen–Kerosene Dual-Fuel Engine
Next Article in Special Issue
Tribocorrosion Behavior of a Medium-Entropy Austenitic Stainless Steel in 3.5 wt.% NaCl: A Comparative Study with 304 and S31254 Stainless Steels
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Contact Characteristics on Dynamic Response of Planar Mechanical Systems with Lubricated Revolute Joint
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Plastic Deformation on the Flattening of Friction Surfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tribocorrosion Behavior of Medium-Entropy Super Austenitic Stainless Steel in Acidic Environments

1
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan
4
Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Lubricants 2025, 13(3), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13030125
Submission received: 10 February 2025 / Revised: 10 March 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 16 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tribology of Metals and Alloys)

Abstract

Although extensive studies have examined the tribocorrosion behavior of stainless steels, the performance of medium-entropy austenitic super stainless steels (MEASS) under severe combined corrosion and mechanical wear conditions has not been fully established. This study systematically compares the tribocorrosion behavior of a newly developed MEASS with conventional S31254 super austenitic stainless steel (SASS) in a 1 M H2SO4 solution, aiming to explore innovative material designs for enhanced performance under these demanding conditions. Electrochemical tests were conducted under both open-circuit potential (OCP) and cathodic potential, with and without sliding wear, to assess the corrosion, wear, and synergistic effects influencing the tribocorrosion performance. Worn surface morphologies and hardness were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and hardness measurements, respectively. The experimental results revealed that MEASS exhibits a superior repassivation capability compared to S31254, with a 34.3% lower total material loss after 24 h of tribocorrosion test, primarily attributed to enhanced strain hardening and improved wear resistance. These findings emphasize the strong potential of MEASS for use in corrosive environments, particularly in chemical processing industries, where high resistance to wear and corrosion is critically required.

1. Introduction

Tribocorrosion is an irreversible degradation process that affects materials due to the combined chemical and mechanical interactions at their surfaces when exposed to corrosive solutions [1]. This synergy between corrosion and wear has a significant impact on the performance and safety of engineering materials and can be broadly classified into two mechanisms: wear-induced corrosion and corrosion-induced wear. In wear-induced corrosion, the wear process raises the surface temperature of the material, accelerating chemical reactions and increasing the corrosion rate. Mechanical wear causes plastic deformation on the material’s surface, which raises its energy state and predisposes it to further corrosion. Moreover, the wear process can damage the protective passivation film, significantly enhancing corrosion. Unlike wear-induced corrosion, corrosion-induced wear originates from chemical reactions that deteriorate the surface before any significant mechanical loading occurs. When a material is exposed to a corrosive environment, chemical reactions can lead to the formation of surface defects such as pits, cracks, or the deposition of corrosion products (e.g., oxides). These defects weaken the surface by reducing its hardness and altering its microstructure. For example, if the corrosion products formed are relatively soft, they may provide a lubricating effect that alters wear behavior. On the other hand, if corrosion renders the surface more brittle, the material is more susceptible to removal by wear. The dislodged corrosion products or oxides, once scattered in the solution, can participate in three-body wear with the substrate, further increasing material loss. These intertwined processes highlight the inherent complexity of tribocorrosion, making its management an inevitable challenge in engineering applications. López-Ortega et al. [2] investigated the tribocorrosion behavior of two types of materials: those that form a passive film and those that actively dissolve. For passivating materials, immersion in an electrolyte leads to the formation of a protective passive film on the surface. However, during sliding contact, this film is disrupted, exposing the unprotected substrate to the electrolyte and initiating galvanic corrosion. In contrast, for actively dissolving materials, immersion results in the formation of a rust layer, which offers poor protection. When sliding occurs, this rust layer is readily removed, thereby diminishing the galvanic effect.
Stainless steels are widely utilized in marine engineering due to their excellent corrosion resistance and mechanical strength. Their inherent ability to form a passive film helps protect against the corrosive effects of chloride ions present in seawater. However, in marine applications, components often experience not only corrosive attack but also mechanical wear. There are numerous studies that have examined tribocorrosion behavior of stainless steels in sodium chloride environments [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. For example, Zhang et al. [3] investigated the tribocorrosion of S31254 steel in artificial seawater and found that sliding contact increases the corrosion current density by three orders of magnitude. This marked deterioration in corrosion resistance is attributed to the damage inflicted on the passivation film during sliding. Similarly, Obadele et al. [6] evaluated the tribocorrosion behavior of AISI 310 and AISI 316 austenitic stainless steels in a 3.5% NaCl solution. They observed that the corrosion potential (Ecorr) decreased during tribocorrosion as a result of the removal or destruction of the oxide films, which in turn promoted wear-induced corrosion. The tribocorrosion performance of stainless steels is also strongly influenced by applied load and rotating speed [4,5,10]. Silva et al. [4] examined the effect of load on the tribocorrosion behavior of S32750 steel in a 3.5 wt.% sodium chloride environment. Their results indicated that higher applied loads lead to more unstable polarization curves, with both the corrosion current density and the current density within the passivation interval increasing. Additionally, a larger area of damaged passivation film was observed on the material’s surface under higher loads. Complementarily, Zhang et al. [10] conducted intermittent OCP measurements under varying loads. They reported that heavier loads cause a more significant drop in the OCP, and although the potential recovers immediately once sliding ceases—indicating the reformation of the passivation film—the recovery takes longer when the load is higher due to more severe film damage. The pH value of the environment also affects tribocorrosion behavior. Zhang et al. [11] studied the tribocorrosion of 304 stainless steel (304SS) in solutions with different pH values and found that higher pH leads to lower corrosion currents and an increased pitting potential. This phenomenon is explained by the role of chloride ions, which react with metal ions in the passive film to form chloride salts that compromise film integrity, whereas hydroxide ions form protective hydroxides due to their superior metal ion bonding properties. Consequently, elevated pH conditions tend to inhibit corrosion. Finally, the viscosity of the test solution is another factor influencing tribocorrosion performance. Cao et al. [12] demonstrated that increasing the solution’s viscosity hinders the wear process, thereby reducing the material loss rate.
On the other hand, stainless steel components used in industrial applications are frequently exposed to highly aggressive acidic environments that promote both chemical corrosion and mechanical wear. Consequently, the corrosion and tribocorrosion behavior of stainless steels in acidic media has attracted considerable attention [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. For instance, Wang et al. [15] investigated the abrasion–corrosion behavior of 304 stainless steel (304SS) in a 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 solution and observed that stirring significantly accelerates hydrogen evolution. Similarly, Zhang et al. [16] examined the tribocorrosion wear of duplex stainless steels in sulfuric acid solutions containing chloride ions, demonstrating that the presence of NaCl increases the overall mass loss rate and intensifies the synergistic effects between wear and corrosion. Therefore, understanding the underlying degradation mechanisms in acidic media is essential for ensuring the structural safety of stainless steel components.
In recent years, the demand for cost-effective materials that offer superior corrosion resistance and excellent mechanical properties has increased, especially for applications in harsh environments. SASS have garnered attention as a viable substitute for traditional austenitic stainless steels. These advanced materials are formulated with higher amounts of critical alloying elements—specifically, chromium (20–24 wt.%), nickel (17–22 wt.%), molybdenum (4–8 wt.%), and nitrogen (0.15–0.5 wt.%)—which together deliver exceptional strength, enhanced toughness, and significantly superior resistance to both pitting and crevice corrosion when compared to standard grades such as AISI 304 and 316 [21,22,23,24]. Consequently, SASS is extensively utilized in a wide range of engineering applications, including those in the marine, chemical, mining, and nuclear industries [25,26]. Nonetheless, in highly corrosive environments, SASS components experience simultaneous corrosion and wear, leading to material degradation that far exceeds the simple additive effects of each process. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the tribocorrosion behavior of SASS is important to ensure its long-term reliability and performance. While extensive studies have examined the corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviors of conventional stainless steel [3,8,27,28], such as S31254 [3], our understanding of how advanced alloys perform under these harsh conditions remains limited. In our previous work, we introduced a novel MEASS that demonstrated comparable corrosion resistance in NaCl solutions and superior mechanical properties relative to the commercial S31254 [24]. Despite the promising potential of MEASS for extreme service environments, there is limited understanding of their tribocorrosion behavior under aggressive environments. This study provides the first comprehensive investigation of the tribocorrosion behavior of MEASS compared to S31254 in a H2SO4 solution, contributing to the development of advanced materials for aggressive, high-wear applications. Wear track microstructures that formed after the tests were characterized using SEM and TEM, and the study systematically discusses the corrosion, wear, and synergistic interactions between these degradation processes for both steels. This research aims to clarify the key mechanisms influencing the tribocorrosion performance of two steels in acidic environments, thereby supporting the development of more durable materials for demanding industrial applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Table 1 lists the chemical compositions of both S31254 and MEASS. The heat treatment for MEASS—specifically, isothermal aging at 700 °C for 4 h—was chosen based on our previous work [24]. Prior to each measurement, all specimens (15 mm × 15 mm × 1 mm) were mechanically ground using silicon carbide (SiC) papers with grit sizes ranging from 80 to 2000. After polishing, the specimen surfaces were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath with ethanol and then allowed to air-dry.

2.2. Electrochemical Tests

The electrochemical tests were divided into three parts: (1) potentiodynamic polarization tests, (2) intermittent OCP measurements, and (3) potentiostatic tests. For the potentiodynamic polarization tests, the potential was scanned from −600 mV to +1200 mV vs. SCE at a rate of 1 mV/s, and polarization curves were obtained under both sliding and non-sliding conditions in a 1 M H2SO4 solution. Prior to the scan, the OCP was monitored for 1800 s to ensure that the specimens reached equilibrium. For the intermittent OCP measurements, the specimens were first maintained under non-sliding conditions for 1800 s, then subjected to sliding for 3600 s. Finally, the potential was continuously recorded for 100 s after sliding ceased. In the potentiostatic sliding tests, an applied passive potential of +400 mV vs. SCE was used for both S31254 and MEASS, as determined from the polarization curve data. Current measurements were initially taken under static conditions for 1000 s, followed by 4000 s of sliding. The current was then continuously recorded during the final 1000 s after sliding was stopped.
Tribocorrosion tests were carried out using a ball-on-disk tribocorrosion tester integrated with a potentiostat (Gamry Ref 600, Warminster, PA, USA), as illustrated in Figure 1. Both corrosion and tribocorrosion measurements employed a standard three-electrode electrochemical configuration, with the metallic specimen serving as the working electrode (WE), a carbon rod as the counter electrode (CE), and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode (RE). In these tests, zirconia balls with a 10 mm diameter acted as the counterpart. All experiments were performed under consistent mechanical conditions—a load of 4.9 N and a rotational speed of 120 rpm—in a 1 M H2SO4 solution, with the metallic specimen exposing an area of 1 cm2.

2.3. Microstructure Characterization and Hardness Measurements

The surface morphology of the two stainless steels was examined using an SEM (JOEL JSM-6510, Tokyo, Japan). Their cross-sectional profiles were captured with a laser scanning microscope (KEYENCE VK-9710, Osaka, Japan). Hardness measurements were performed using a Vickers hardness tester (FM-700e, Future-Tech Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) under a load of 0.5 kg for 10 s. For each specimen, the reported hardness values represent the average of 10 individual tests.

2.4. Material Loss Rate Analysis

In this study, the material loss rate was evaluated following the ASTM G119 standard [29], which outlines the calculation of the interaction between wear and corrosion. The total material loss rate, T, can be expressed as the sum of three components, as shown in Equation (1).
T = C0 + W0 + S
In this equation, the T value was determined by weighing the specimen before and after the tribocorrosion test conducted at OCP for 24 h; C0 represents the corrosion rate without wear (pure corrosion), calculated from the corrosion current density obtained from the relevant potentiodynamic polarization curves under corrosion conditions; and W0 denotes the wear rate without corrosion (pure mechanical wear), calculated from the volume of the wear tracks measured from cross-sectional profiles produced during potentiostatic tests at −500 mV vs. SCE for 24 h. Furthermore, the wear–corrosion synergistic factor (S) can be divided into two components, as defined in Equation (2).
S = ΔCw + ΔWc
where ΔCw represents the increment in corrosion due to wear, while ΔWc denotes the increment in wear due to corrosion. These parameters can be calculated using Equations (3) and (4), respectively [25].
ΔCW = Cw − C0
ΔWC = T − W0 − Cw
Cw is calculated based on the corrosion current density extracted from the potentiodynamic polarization curves under wear conditions

3. Results

3.1. Potentiodynamic Polarization Test

Figure 2 illustrates the potentiodynamic polarization curves for both S31254 and MEASS specimens under sliding (tribocorrosion) and non-sliding (corrosion-only) conditions in a 1 M H2SO4 solution. The key electrochemical parameters—namely, the corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (icorr), and passive current density (ipass)—extracted from these curves are summarized in Table 2. Under corrosion-only conditions, both steels exhibit typical passivation behavior in their anodic polarization curves, transitioning smoothly from active to passive and ultimately to transpassive states. Notably, the MEASS specimen shows similar Ecorr and icorr values to those of S31254, suggesting that its corrosion resistance is comparable.
In contrast, under tribocorrosion conditions, the Ecorr values shift slightly in the cathodic direction, while the icorr values increase by at least an order of magnitude relative to those observed in polarization measurements under corrosion-only conditions. A distinct feature in these curves is the emergence of a passive-like region—a plateau of constant current—in the anodic branch for all steels. However, due to the relatively high current density values in this region, it is more accurately described as pseudo-passivation rather than true passivation (which is typically characterized by a passive current density below 10−5A/cm2 [26,30]). It should be noted that in Figure 2b, a small current peak is observed under tribocorrosion conditions, which we speculate can be attributed to the selective dissolution of Cu-rich precipitates in the MEASS substrate. Our previous study [24] identified spherical Cu-rich nanoparticles in MEASS. Based on the Pourbaix diagram for copper, under our experimental conditions (1 M H2SO4, pH ≈ 0–1, and potentials of 0 mV to +50 mV vs. SCE/+241 mV to +291 mV vs. SHE), these Cu-rich phases become unstable and dissolve into Cu2⁺ ions, causing a transient current peak. Accordingly, from the data in Table 2, the MEASS specimen demonstrates a higher Ecorr and a lower icorr compared to S31254, indicating that MEASS possesses superior resistance to tribocorrosion.

3.2. Intermittent OCP Measurements

OCP measurements provide valuable insights into the changes in alloy surface conditions, particularly regarding passivation and depassivation phenomena. In this study, we monitored the evolution of the OCP for both steels before, during, and after sliding in a 1 M H2SO4 solution. As illustrated in Figure 3, both steels followed a similar trend in OCP evolution throughout the tests. After an initial immersion period of 1800 s under unloaded conditions, all specimens stabilized at a constant potential, confirming the formation of passive films on their surfaces [31]. Notably, the MEASS specimen exhibited a more noble stable potential (−50 mV vs. SCE) compared to the S31254 specimen (−100 mV vs. SCE), indicating that the passive film on MEASS has enhanced corrosion resistance.
Upon the initiation of sliding, both steels experienced a rapid shift toward more negative potentials, a change attributed to the disruption of the passive film by fretting motion, which exposed the underlying metal to more active corrosion conditions. During the sliding phase, fluctuations in the OCP were observed, reflecting the ongoing competition between passivation and depassivation reactions. Once sliding ceased, the potentials of all specimens quickly shifted back toward more noble values and gradually returned to their pre-sliding levels, indicating effective repassivation of the worn areas. Significantly, the MEASS specimen recovered its initial potential much faster than the S31254 specimen, demonstrating that MEASS exhibits superior repassivation capability in the H2SO4 solution—likely due to its higher chromium and nickel content.

3.3. Potentiostatic Test

The potentiostatic test is essential for assessing the tribocorrosion performance of metallic substrates. It enables effective monitoring of passive film formation and the dynamic changes that occur during wear processes, providing valuable information into the stability and repassivation behavior of the protective films formed on metallic surfaces. Therefore, the evolution of current density over time was monitored at an applied passive potential (+400 mV vs. SCE for both S31254 and MEASS, as determined from prior polarization curve results) in the H2SO4 solution. Figure 4 displays these results. During the initial 500 s—prior to sliding—the current density remained near zero, confirming the presence of intact passive films on the steel surfaces. Once sliding began, an abrupt increase in current density was observed for all specimens, signaling accelerated corrosion as the passive films were disrupted or removed in the contact areas. Throughout the sliding phase, both steels exhibited a gradual increase in current density with noticeable fluctuations, reflecting the ongoing dynamic interplay between the formation and degradation of the passive film. By the end of the sliding period, the S31254 specimen reached a current density of 275 µA/cm2, whereas the MEASS specimen recorded a lower value of 189 µA/cm2. This consistently lower current density for MEASS under anodic conditions indicates a reduced degree of depassivation, thereby demonstrating its superior repassivation ability compared to S31254.

3.4. Microstructure Characterization of Wear Track and Evaluation of Material Loss After Tribocorrosion Test

Figure 5 and Figure 6 present SEM images of the worn surface morphologies on the wear tracks, along with their corresponding cross-sectional profiles, for both steels after 24 h of tribocorrosion tests at OCP conditions. Figure 5a,b shows plowing grooves aligned with the sliding direction on both samples. However, when comparing the enlarged SEM images, Figure 5(b-1) reveals more pronounced peeling marks on the S31254 surface than those seen in Figure 5(a-1), suggesting a higher susceptibility to tribocorrosion-induced degradation. The EDS spectra obtained from the areas labeled 1–4 in Figure 5(a-2,b-2), as quantified in Table 3, reveal that the composition of the worn surface closely resembles that of the base substrate. The wear track dimensions summarized in Table 4 correspond to the cross-sectional profiles presented in Figure 6. The data clearly indicate that the S31254 specimen exhibits considerably wider and deeper wear tracks than the MEASS specimen, implying a greater volume of material removal. These findings align with the earlier SEM image observations.
Figure 7 compares the total material loss (T) for both specimens tested under identical experimental conditions. As is consistent with previous cross-sectional profile observations, the S31254 specimen exhibits a significantly higher total material loss than the MEASS specimen, which indicates its lower resistance to tribocorrosion under the tested conditions. Moreover, W0 contributes more than 50% to the total material loss for both steels, demonstrating that mechanical wear plays a dominant role in their overall tribocorrosion behavior. To better understand this influence, a detailed investigation of the microstructural evolution within the wear tracks following the W0 test is necessary to further clarify the tribocorrosion performance differences observed between these two steels.

3.5. Microstructure Characterization of Wear Track and Evaluation of Material Loss After W0 Test

Figure 8 and Figure 9 display SEM images of worn surface morphologies and the corresponding cross-sectional profiles of the wear tracks for both steels after 24 h of the W0 test. Figure 8a,b illustrates that, while plowing grooves remain visible, they are significantly less pronounced compared to those observed in Figure 5a,b—particularly for the MEASS specimen. High-magnification SEM images taken from the track centers (Figure 8(a-1,b-1)) reveal clear differences in wear characteristics under cathodic conditions. For the S31254 specimen, distinct plowing grooves aligned parallel to the sliding direction can be clearly observed. These grooves result from harder asperities on the zirconia balls gouging into the relatively softer metal surface [32]. In contrast, the MEASS specimen exhibits notably shallower grooves, indicating a harder and more wear-resistant surface. Although the differences in surface morphologies might appear subtle, cross-sectional images obtained after the W0 test reveal a notable difference in wear volume between the two steels. As shown in Figure 9 and wear track dimensions summarized in Table 5, the MEASS specimen exhibits narrower and shallower wear tracks, indicating a substantially lower wear volume caused by pure mechanical wear compared to S31254. To further elucidate the superior mechanical wear resistance of MEASS in H2SO4 solution, TEM characterization was conducted to investigate the microstructural differences between the two steels after the W0 test.
Figure 10a illustrates the microstructure from the surface to the volume in 31254SS after 24 h of wear, showing a gradient of plastic strain. Figure 10b,c reveals a heavily deformed microstructure, including dislocation debris and deformation bands. In addition, ultrafine grains (UFGs) and nanograins (NGs) are present in only certain areas of the surface, as shown in the subpanel of Figure 10b. As the depth goes into the volume, i.e., the strain level decreases, only dislocation debris is observed, as seen in Figure 10d. Importantly, based on the worn microstructure in Figure 10, the dislocations appear wavy and entangled.
Figure 11a illustrates the microstructure from the surface to the volume in MEASS after 24 h of the W0 test. Unlike S31254, Figure 11b shows that a uniform UFG/NG layer has developed in the surface layer, which is a product microstructure of dynamic recrystallization. Figure 11c depicts a high dislocation density forming a Taylor lattice, indicating planar slip of dislocations. Figure 11d clearly demonstrates that dislocations undergo planar slip even at lower strain levels. Therefore, plastic deformation occurs through wavy slip in S31254 but through planar slip in MEASS. This result also confirms that MEASS exhibits low stacking fault energy.

4. Discussion

Tribocorrosion is the surface reaction behavior resulting from the combined effects of mechanical, chemical, and electrochemical processes during sliding contact friction in corrosive environments. In addition to the individual effects of wear and corrosion, their interaction plays a crucial role in determining the performance and safety of engineering materials and can be classified into two mechanisms: wear-induced corrosion and corrosion-induced wear. In wear-induced corrosion, mechanical wear elevates the surface temperature, accelerates chemical reactions, and damages the protective film, thereby promoting corrosion. The other mechanism, corrosion-induced wear, occurs when chemical reactions create surface defects—such as pits and cracks—that weaken the material and modify its wear behavior by either lubricating or embrittling the surface. The continuous interaction between these processes accelerates material degradation and leads to premature failure. Therefore, in this study, we not only measure the total material loss by weighing samples before and after the tribocorrosion tests (see Figure 7) but also quantify the contributions of pure mechanical wear and the combined effects of wear and corrosion on steels operating under tribological contact in corrosive environments. Accordingly, the material loss rates attributed to pure mechanical wear, pure corrosion, wear-induced corrosion, and corrosion-induced wear were calculated following the ASTM G119 standard, with the results summarized in Table 6 and Table 7. In these tables, the S value represents the combined synergistic effects (ΔCw + ΔWc), while C and W denote the total corrosion components (C0 + ΔCw) and wear components (W0 + ΔWc), respectively. The data in Table 6 and Table 7 reveal that, although both steels have similar C0 values, the MEASS specimen exhibits a lower ΔCw value compared to S31254. This difference is attributed to the superior repassivation capability of MEASS when its passive film is disrupted by wear. Wear-induced corrosion typically arises from additional corrosion occurring on the freshly exposed metal surface following the mechanical removal of the passive film. The enhanced repassivation ability of MEASS promotes a more rapid reformation of the passive film in the worn areas, thereby reducing the ΔCw value during the tribocorrosion test. Furthermore, while the corrosion components (C0 + ΔCw) account for approximately 20% of the total material loss rate for both steels, their contribution is significantly lower than that of the wear components (W0 + ΔWc) under tribocorrosion conditions in 1 M H2SO4. Given the negligible contribution of ΔWc to the overall wear components, it is evident that pure mechanical wear is the dominant factor governing the total material loss rate—contributing about 67% for S31254 and 75% for MEASS during tribocorrosion tests conducted at OCP.
Moreover, the W0 value of MEASS is approximately 26% lower than that of S31254 under identical tribocorrosion test conditions. This reduction is likely due to the enhanced surface hardness of MEASS relative to S31254 during the tests. The results suggest that the pure mechanical wear rate—closely linked to the contact surface hardness—is the primary factor influencing the tribocorrosion behavior of both steels in H2SO4. Figure 12 illustrates the evolution of hardness for S31254 and MEASS, measured on the worn surfaces after various durations of the W0 test in H2SO4. As depicted, both steels exhibit a continuous increase in hardness with increasing pure wear time. This enhancement is attributed to strain hardening and the accumulation of deformation in the subsurface region [33]. Notably, the surface hardness of MEASS increased significantly—from 208 Hv before testing to 289 Hv after 6 h, representing a 38.9% increase. In contrast, the S31254 specimen showed a more modest improvement of 23.7%, suggesting that strain hardening occurs more prominently in the MEASS specimen. The pronounced strain hardening behavior observed in MEASS can be explained well by the TEM results described previously. Figure 10 and Figure 11 demonstrate a gradient worn microstructure from surface to volume. As the strain decreases, the microstructure transitions from UFG/NG to deformation bands or Taylor lattice, and then to dislocation debris. During plastic deformation, an extremely high dislocation density can induce dynamic recrystallization, forming UFGs and NGs in the deformed microstructure [34]. Hence, MEASS is expected to exhibit a higher capacity for dislocation storage. This is supported by its uniform UFG/NG layer and higher hardness. It is well-known that planar slip and Taylor lattice structures can enhance the capacity for dislocation storage in face-centered cubic materials [35,36]. In summary, the planar slip of dislocations in MEASS contributes to a higher dislocation density and latter dynamic recrystallization of UFGs and NGs, resulting in its high hardness. Overall, although both steels follow a similar hardness evolution trend, MEASS consistently exhibits higher hardness than S31254 under all conditions, leading to its superior tribocorrosion performance in the H2SO4 acid solution.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the tribocorrosion behavior of MEASS in a H2SO4 solution was investigated and compared with that of conventional S31254, with evaluations of material loss resulting from pure corrosion, pure wear, corrosion-accelerated wear, and wear-accelerated corrosion. Based on tribocorrosion measurements and microstructural characterization, it was found that both steels exhibited similar behavior in potentiodynamic polarization tests under sliding and non-sliding conditions; however, OCP measurements revealed that MEASS possesses a higher repassivation capability than S31254. After tribocorrosion tests, the wear track on the S31254 specimen showed a significantly greater width and depth compared to that on the MEASS specimen, and over 24 h, the total material loss for MEASS was lower than that for S31254. For the first time, the tribocorrosion behavior of MEASS in a H2SO4 solution was investigated and found to be predominantly governed by mechanical wear, with the reduced wear in MEASS attributed to its higher hardness arising from superior strain hardening behavior. MEASS exhibits excellent tribocorrosion resistance, making it suitable for demanding applications requiring durability, minimal material loss, and low maintenance. Future research will focus on optimizing alloy composition and heat treatment to further enhance corrosion and wear resistance, as well as extending tests to diverse corrosive environments and long-term industrial conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-R.C. and Y.-L.L.; Methodology, C.-C.L.; Validation, S.-Y.H.; Formal analysis, C.-C.L. and S.-Y.H.; Investigation, C.-C.L. and T.-H.Y.; Resources, H.-W.Y.; Writing—original draft, C.-C.L.; Writing—review & editing, Y.-R.C., I.-C.C., P.-W.C., H.-W.Y. and Y.-L.L.; Supervision, Y.-L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C, under Grant No. MOST 108-2221-E-002-055-MY2 and MOST 109-2224-E-002-002.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Y.-L.L., upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We especially thank I-Chung Cheng and Peng-Wei Chu for providing technical assistance and valuable contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Landolt, D.; Mischler, S. Tribocorrosion of Passive Metals and Coatings; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. López-Ortega, A.; Arana, J.; Bayón, R. On the comparison of the tribocorrosion behavior of passive and non-passivating materials and assessment of the influence of agitation. Wear 2020, 456, 203388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Yin, X.-Y.; Yan, F.-Y. Tribocorrosion behaviour of type S31254 steel in seawater: Identification of corrosion—Wear components and effect of potential. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 179, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silva, R.C.C.; Nogueira, R.P.; Bastos, I.N. Tribocorrosion of UNS S32750 in chloride medium: Effect of the load level. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 8839–8845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, Y.; Rana, V. Tribocorrosion behaviour of AISI 304 stainless steel in 0.5 M NaCl solution. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 129, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Obadele, B.A.; Andrews, A.; Shongwe, M.B.; Olubambi, P.A. Tribocorrosion behaviours of AISI 310 and AISI 316 austenitic stainless steels in 3.5% NaCl solution. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 171, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alkan, S.; Gök, M.S. Effect of sliding wear and electrochemical potential on tribocorrosion behaviour of AISI 316 stainless steel in seawater. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2021, 24, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haruman, E.; Sun, Y.; Adenan, M. A comparative study of the tribocorrosion behaviour of low temperature nitrided austenitic and duplex stainless steels in NaCl solution. Tribol. Int. 2020, 151, 106412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alkan, S. Evaluation of pitting susceptibility and tribocorrosion behaviors of AISI 304 stainless steel in marine environments. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2023, 237, 808–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Yin, X.; Wang, J.; Yan, F. Influence of microstructure evolution on tribocorrosion of 304SS in artificial seawater. Corros. Sci. 2014, 88, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Yin, X.; Yan, Y.; Wang, J.; Yan, F. Tribocorrosion behaviors of 304SS: Effect of solution pH. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 17676–17682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cao, S.; Mischler, S. A lubricated tribocorrosion model incorporating surface roughness. Biotribology 2021, 26, 100181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, Y.; Haruman, E. Effect of electrochemical potential on tribocorrosion behavior of low temperature plasma carburized 316L stainless steel in 1 M H2SO4 solution. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 205, 4280–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shtefan, V.; Kanunnikova, N.; Pilipenko, A.; Pancheva, H. Corrosion behavior of AISI 304 steel in acid solutions. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 6, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.; Yan, Y.; Su, Y.; Qiao, L. Effects of stirring action during friction on electrode processes of AISI 304 stainless steel in sulphuric acid. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 298, 756–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, T.; Jiang, X.; Lu, X.; Li, S.; Shi, C. Corrosion wear of duplex stainless steels in sulfuric acid solution containing chloride. Corrosion 1994, 50, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Priya, R.; Ningshen, S. The Tribocorrosion Behaviour and its Mechanisms of Type 304L Stainless Steel in Nitric Acid Media. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2023, 32, 5261–5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Anburaj, J.; Nazirudeen, S.M.; Narayanan, R.; Anandavel, B.; Chandrasekar, A. Ageing of forged superaustenitic stainless steel: Precipitate phases and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 535, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hänninen, H.; Romu, J.; Ilola, R.; Tervo, J.; Laitinen, A. Effects of processing and manufacturing of high nitrogen-containing stainless steels on their mechanical, corrosion and wear properties. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2001, 117, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Plaut, R.L.; Herrera, C.; Escriba, D.M.; Rios, P.R.; Padilha, A.F. A short review on wrought austenitic stainless steels at high temperatures: Processing, microstructure, properties and performance. Mater. Res. 2007, 10, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lewis, A.; Bingert, J.; Rowenhorst, D.; Gupta, A.; Geltmacher, A.; Spanos, G. Two-and three-dimensional microstructural characterization of a super-austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 418, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, S.-H.; Wu, C.-C.; Chen, C.-Y.; Yang, J.-R.; Chiu, P.-K.; Fang, J. Cyclic deformation and phase transformation of 6Mo superaustenitic stainless steel. Met. Mater. Int. 2007, 13, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, H.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Feng, H.; Han, P.; Dong, N.; Zhang, W.; Li, G.; Fan, G. A new insight into high-temperature oxidation mechanism of super-austenitic stainless steel S32654 in air. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 686, 326–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, T.-E.; Huang, S.-Y.; Chu, Y.-R.; Chen, S.-C.; Tseng, M.-Y.; Yen, H.-W.; Lee, Y.-L. Investigating the effects of aging time on corrosion resistance and antibacterial property of newly designed medium-entropy super austenitic stainless steels. Materialia 2023, 27, 101687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Priya, R.; Mallika, C.; Mudali, U.K. Wear and tribocorrosion behaviour of 304L SS, Zr-702, Zircaloy-4 and Ti-grade2. Wear 2014, 310, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Konadu, D.; Van Der Merwe, J.; Potgieter, J.; Potgieter-Vermaak, S.; Machio, C.N. The corrosion behaviour of WC-VC-Co hardmetals in acidic media. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 3118–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Z.; Liu, E.; Du, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Du, H.; Cai, H. Tribocorrosion behavior of typical austenitic, martensitic, and ferritic stainless steels in 3.5% NaCl solution. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2021, 30, 6284–6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Parker, M.E.; Horton, D.J.; Wahl, K.J. Tribocorrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel in sodium chloride and sodium sulfate environments. Tribol. Lett. 2022, 70, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. ASTM G119-09(2016); Standard Guide for Determining Synergism Between Wear and Corrosion. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  30. Human, A.; Exner, H. The relationship between electrochemical behaviour and in-service corrosion of WC based cemented carbides. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 1997, 15, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buciumeanu, M.; Araujo, A.; Carvalho, O.; Miranda, G.; Souza, J.; Silva, F.; Henriques, B. Study of the tribocorrosion behaviour of Ti6Al4V–HA biocomposites. Tribol. Int. 2017, 107, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, B.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Yan, Y.; Jiang, P.; Yan, F. Tribocorrosion properties of AISI 1045 and AISI 2205 steels in seawater: Synergistic interactions of wear and corrosion. Friction 2021, 9, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tyfour, W.; Beynon, J.; Kapoor, A. The steady state wear behaviour of pearlitic rail steel under dry rolling-sliding contact conditions. Wear 1995, 180, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sakai, T.; Belyakov, A.; Kaibyshev, R.; Miura, H.; Jonas, J.J. Dynamic and post-dynamic recrystallization under hot, cold and severe plastic deformation conditions. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 60, 130–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, Y.-H.; Chen, S.-W.; Lai, Z.-H.; Lu, S.-L.; Lin, Y.-T.; Tu, J.-F.; Yen, H.-W. Strain-hardening resilience via the cooperation of geometrically necessary dislocations and deformation twins in a strong and ductile lightweight high-entropy steel. Mater. Des. 2024, 244, 113212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lai, Z.-H.; Sun, Y.-H.; Lin, Y.-T.; Tu, J.-F.; Yen, H.-W. Mechanism of twinning induced plasticity in austenitic lightweight steel driven by compositional complexity. Acta Mater. 2021, 210, 116814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of tribocorrosion ball-on-disk experimental setup.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of tribocorrosion ball-on-disk experimental setup.
Lubricants 13 00125 g001
Figure 2. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of (a) S31254 and (b) MEASS.
Figure 2. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of (a) S31254 and (b) MEASS.
Lubricants 13 00125 g002
Figure 3. Evaluation of OCP in 1 M H2SO4 with and without sliding: (a) S31254 and (b) MEASS.
Figure 3. Evaluation of OCP in 1 M H2SO4 with and without sliding: (a) S31254 and (b) MEASS.
Lubricants 13 00125 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of current density recorded before, during, and after sliding tests under anodic polarization conditions (+400 mV vs. SCE): (a) S31254 and (b) MEASS.
Figure 4. Evolution of current density recorded before, during, and after sliding tests under anodic polarization conditions (+400 mV vs. SCE): (a) S31254 and (b) MEASS.
Lubricants 13 00125 g004
Figure 5. Surface morphology observation of worn surface after tribocorrosion test for 24 h. (a) S31254, (b) MEASS, (a-1) and (b-1) are enlarged images in (a) and (b), respectively, (a-2) and (b-2) are enlarged images in (a-1) and (b-1).
Figure 5. Surface morphology observation of worn surface after tribocorrosion test for 24 h. (a) S31254, (b) MEASS, (a-1) and (b-1) are enlarged images in (a) and (b), respectively, (a-2) and (b-2) are enlarged images in (a-1) and (b-1).
Lubricants 13 00125 g005
Figure 6. Cross-sectional profiles of wear tracks produced after tribocorrosion test for 24 h.
Figure 6. Cross-sectional profiles of wear tracks produced after tribocorrosion test for 24 h.
Lubricants 13 00125 g006
Figure 7. Mechanical wear, synergistic factor, and total mass loss of S31254 and MEASS.
Figure 7. Mechanical wear, synergistic factor, and total mass loss of S31254 and MEASS.
Lubricants 13 00125 g007
Figure 8. Surface morphology observation of worn surface after W0 test. (a) S31254, (b) MEASS, (a-1), and (b-1) are enlarged images in (a) and (b), respectively.
Figure 8. Surface morphology observation of worn surface after W0 test. (a) S31254, (b) MEASS, (a-1), and (b-1) are enlarged images in (a) and (b), respectively.
Lubricants 13 00125 g008
Figure 9. Cross-sectional profiles of wear tracks produced after W0 test.
Figure 9. Cross-sectional profiles of wear tracks produced after W0 test.
Lubricants 13 00125 g009
Figure 10. Bright-field TEM images of S31254 after 24 h of the W0 test: (a) an overview of the worn S31254, with the star marking the location of the selected-area diffraction; (b) a magnified view of the dashed square 1 in (a); (c) a magnified view of the dashed square 2 in (a); and (d) a magnified view of the dashed square 3 in (a).
Figure 10. Bright-field TEM images of S31254 after 24 h of the W0 test: (a) an overview of the worn S31254, with the star marking the location of the selected-area diffraction; (b) a magnified view of the dashed square 1 in (a); (c) a magnified view of the dashed square 2 in (a); and (d) a magnified view of the dashed square 3 in (a).
Lubricants 13 00125 g010
Figure 11. Bright-field TEM images of MEASS after 24 h of the W0 test: (a) an overview of the worn MEASS, with the star marking the location of the selected-area diffraction; (b) a magnified view of the dashed square 1 in (a); (c) a magnified view of the dashed square 2 in (a); and (d) a magnified view of the dashed square 3 in (a).
Figure 11. Bright-field TEM images of MEASS after 24 h of the W0 test: (a) an overview of the worn MEASS, with the star marking the location of the selected-area diffraction; (b) a magnified view of the dashed square 1 in (a); (c) a magnified view of the dashed square 2 in (a); and (d) a magnified view of the dashed square 3 in (a).
Lubricants 13 00125 g011
Figure 12. Evolution of hardness values of S31254 and MEASS specimens after various durations of W0 test.
Figure 12. Evolution of hardness values of S31254 and MEASS specimens after various durations of W0 test.
Lubricants 13 00125 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt. %) of S31254 and MEASS.
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt. %) of S31254 and MEASS.
FeCrNiMoCuMnN
S31254Bal2018.316.10.730.950.21
MEASSBal24.921.55.54.10.60.3
Table 2. Electrochemical parameters extracted from potentiodynamic polarization curves of S31254 and MEASS.
Table 2. Electrochemical parameters extracted from potentiodynamic polarization curves of S31254 and MEASS.
S31254Ecorr (mV)icorrA/cm2)ipassA/cm2)
Corrosion−210 ± 2.31.7 ± 0.173.87 ± 0.2
Tribocorrosion−236 ± 1.730.9 ± 8.82247 ± 14.2
MEASSEcorr (mV)icorr (μA/cm2)ipass (μA/cm2)
Corrosion−199 ± 19.43.3 ± 1.52.78 ± 0.1
Tribocorrosion−248 ± 7.115.6 ± 2.6137 ± 11.9
Table 3. EDS analysis results of worn surface after tribocorrosion test for 24 h.
Table 3. EDS analysis results of worn surface after tribocorrosion test for 24 h.
Elements (wt %)FeCrNiMoCu
Spectrum 155.8319.2918.036.85--
Spectrum 253.3619.0621.136.45--
Spectrum 340.8121.7325.706.465.30
Spectrum 441.3919.9426.546.945.20
Table 4. The size of the wear track of S31254 and MEASS after the tribocorrosion test for 24 h.
Table 4. The size of the wear track of S31254 and MEASS after the tribocorrosion test for 24 h.
SpecimenWidth (μm)Maximum Depth (μm)
S312541149.0 ± 14.726.1 ± 1.1
MEASS876.4 ± 15.616.4 ± 0.8
Table 5. The size of the wear tracks of S31254 and MEASS after the W0 test.
Table 5. The size of the wear tracks of S31254 and MEASS after the W0 test.
Specimen Width   ( μ m) Maximum   Depth   ( μ m)
S31254988.1 ± 10.218.6 ± 1.5
MEASS711.7 ± 9.811.2 ± 1.3
Table 6. Contributions of various components to total volume loss in tribocorrosion for S31254.
Table 6. Contributions of various components to total volume loss in tribocorrosion for S31254.
S31254Values (mm/yr)Percentage (%)
T1.369100
C0.31222.79
C00.0171.24
ΔCW0.29521.55
W1.05777.21
W00.91266.62
ΔWC0.14510.59
S0.44032.14
Table 7. Contributions of various components to total volume loss in tribocorrosion for MEASS.
Table 7. Contributions of various components to total volume loss in tribocorrosion for MEASS.
MEASSValues (mm/yr)Percentage (%)
T0.899100
C0.15417.13
C00.0333.67
ΔCW0.12113.46
W0.74582.87
W00.67474.97
ΔWC0.0717.90
S0.19221.36
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.-C.; Huang, S.-Y.; Chu, Y.-R.; Yang, T.-H.; Yen, H.-W.; Cheng, I.-C.; Chu, P.-W.; Lee, Y.-L. Tribocorrosion Behavior of Medium-Entropy Super Austenitic Stainless Steel in Acidic Environments. Lubricants 2025, 13, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13030125

AMA Style

Liu C-C, Huang S-Y, Chu Y-R, Yang T-H, Yen H-W, Cheng I-C, Chu P-W, Lee Y-L. Tribocorrosion Behavior of Medium-Entropy Super Austenitic Stainless Steel in Acidic Environments. Lubricants. 2025; 13(3):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13030125

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Chia-Chi, Shih-Yen Huang, Yu-Ren Chu, Tzu-Hsien Yang, Hung-Wei Yen, I-Chung Cheng, Peng-Wei Chu, and Yueh-Lien Lee. 2025. "Tribocorrosion Behavior of Medium-Entropy Super Austenitic Stainless Steel in Acidic Environments" Lubricants 13, no. 3: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13030125

APA Style

Liu, C.-C., Huang, S.-Y., Chu, Y.-R., Yang, T.-H., Yen, H.-W., Cheng, I.-C., Chu, P.-W., & Lee, Y.-L. (2025). Tribocorrosion Behavior of Medium-Entropy Super Austenitic Stainless Steel in Acidic Environments. Lubricants, 13(3), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13030125

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop