Next Article in Journal
Next Frontier in HER2+/HR+ Breast Cancer: Leveraging Cell Cycle Control with CDK4/6 Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Soft-Palate Changes After Orthognathic Surgery: A Three-Dimensional Assessment of Positioning and Morphology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Polyphenol–Microbiota Axis: Molecular Mechanisms, Metabolic Pathways, and Therapeutic Perspectives in Human Health

by
Andrea Ballini
1,†,
Simona Nicole Barile
2,†,
Alfredo De Rosa
1,†,
Maria Eleonora Bizzoca
3,
Mariarosaria Boccellino
1,
Salvatore Scacco
4,*,
Stefania Cantore
1,
Lorenzo Lo Muzio
3,
Francesco Massimo Lasorsa
2,5 and
Roberto Arrigoni
2,*
1
Department of Life Science, Health and Health Professions, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy
2
CNR Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies (IBIOM), 70124 Bari, Italy
3
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
4
School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy
5
Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70125 Bari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Pers. Med. 2026, 16(3), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16030142
Submission received: 26 December 2025 / Revised: 21 February 2026 / Accepted: 26 February 2026 / Published: 2 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Omics/Informatics)

Abstract

Polyphenols are a diverse class of bioactive phytochemicals increasingly recognized for their ability to modulate human physiology through extensive interactions with the gut microbiota. This review provides a comprehensive and updated synthesis of the bidirectional polyphenol–microbiota relationship, emphasizing how dietary polyphenols reshape microbial community structure while intestinal microorganisms metabolize polyphenols into smaller, more bioavailable derivatives. These microbial metabolites—such as urolithins, phenolic acids, and dihydroresveratrol—exert amplified biological activities compared to their parent molecules, acting on key molecular pathways linked to oxidative stress, inflammation, energy homeostasis, and metabolic regulation. Through integration of mechanistic studies, multi-omics analyses, and emerging clinical evidence, this review outlines the potential of the polyphenol–microbiota–metabolite axis as a target for precision nutrition and microbiota-informed therapeutic interventions. The manuscript highlights ongoing challenges, including inter-individual variability in polyphenol metabolism, and proposes future research directions to advance the field of personalized nutrition.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polyphenols constitute one of the most abundant and structurally diverse families of phytochemicals found in the human diet [1]. They are present in fruits, vegetables, tea, coffee, cocoa, wine, nuts, cereals, and spices. Over the past several decades, a wealth of epidemiological, clinical, and mechanistic studies has associated high polyphenol intake with a reduced risk of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, neurodegenerative disorders, and certain cancers [2,3,4,5,6]. Although polyphenols have been historically described as antioxidants, their effects in vivo extend far beyond radical scavenging, encompassing anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, metabolic, and signaling-modulatory activities.
A central factor influencing the biological activity of dietary polyphenols is their extensive interaction with the gut microbiota. The human gastrointestinal tract contains trillions of microorganisms that collectively encode far more genes than the human genome [7]. This microbial ecosystem plays essential roles in digestion, nutrient absorption, immune maturation, and neuroimmune communication [8]. Increasing evidence demonstrates that the gut microbiota and polyphenols engage in a highly dynamic and reciprocal relationship: polyphenols modulate microbial composition and activity, while microbes transform polyphenols into metabolites with enhanced physiological impact [9,10].
The apparent paradox of polyphenols’ low intestinal absorption and their widely documented systemic benefits can be resolved through understanding the gut microbiota’s essential role in polyphenol metabolism. In the colon, unabsorbed polyphenols undergo microbial biotransformation through hydrolysis, dehydroxylation, demethylation, and ring cleavage [10]. The resulting low-molecular-weight metabolites have improved bioavailability and often exhibit more potent biological effects. These metabolites influence host cellular responses by modulating signaling pathways related to oxidative stress, inflammation, and energy metabolism.
This review provides a detailed, integrated analysis of the polyphenol–microbiota axis, covering polyphenol classification and metabolism, microbial community responses, mechanistic insights into host–microbial signaling, and evidence from clinical trials. We also highlight emerging opportunities for microbiota-targeted nutrition interventions.

2. Polyphenols: Diversity, Sources, and Bioavailability

Polyphenols comprise a broad and heterogeneous group of phytochemicals characterized by one or more aromatic rings bearing hydroxyl groups (Figure 1). They are traditionally classified into four principal categories—flavonoids, phenolic acids, stilbenes, and lignans—each encompassing numerous bioactive compounds found in everyday foods and beverages [11].
Flavonoids represent the largest and most extensively studied class, including subclasses such as flavonols (quercetin, kaempferol), flavan-3-ols (catechins, epicatechins), flavones (apigenin, luteolin), and anthocyanins (cyanidin, delphinidin). These compounds are abundant in fruits, tea, cocoa, red wine, and vegetables, and have been linked to cardiovascular protection and anti-inflammatory effects.
Phenolic acids, including hydroxybenzoic (e.g., gallic acid) and hydroxycinnamic (e.g., caffeic, ferulic) acids, occur mainly in coffee, grains, and berries. They contribute substantially to total dietary polyphenol intake and are recognized for their antioxidant and antimicrobial activities.
Stilbenes, exemplified by resveratrol from grapes and red wine, exhibit potent cardiometabolic and anticancer properties. Similarly, lignans, found in flaxseed, sesame, and whole grains, display estrogenic and antioxidant effects and may play a role in hormone-related disease prevention.
Despite their abundance, the bioavailability of polyphenols is relatively low, as only a small fraction (5–10%) is absorbed in the small intestine [12]. The remaining compounds reach the colon largely intact, where the gut microbiota catalyzes their biotransformation into smaller metabolites with enhanced absorption and biological activity [13,14].
The complexity of these transformations underscores the essential interplay between diet and microbiota. The diversity and metabolic capacity of an individual’s gut microbial community determine how efficiently polyphenols are converted into bioactive metabolites, influencing both inter-individual variability in responses and the therapeutic potential of polyphenol-rich diets.
Hence, polyphenols act as prebiotic-like compounds, reaching the colon where they serve as substrates for specific bacterial taxa. The resulting metabolites exhibit higher bio-efficacy and systemic availability than their precursors. Understanding this microbial conversion process provides a biochemical basis for designing personalized dietary interventions that optimize polyphenol metabolism and health outcomes.

3. The Gut Microbiota: Composition and Function

The human gut microbiota is a highly complex and dynamic ecosystem comprising trillions of microorganisms—including bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses—that collectively encode over 100 times more genes than the human genome [15]. This community exerts profound influences on host physiology [16], affecting nutrient metabolism [17], immune system maturation [18], and even neurobehavioral regulation [19].
Four major bacterial phyla dominate the human gut: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria (Figure 2). Within these groups, genera such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Faecalibacterium, and Akkermansia play essential roles in maintaining gut homeostasis. They contribute to the fermentation of complex polysaccharides, production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)—notably acetate, propionate, and butyrate—and the synthesis of vitamins (e.g., vitamin K, B-group vitamins) [20].
SCFAs are particularly significant in linking microbial metabolism to host health. They provide an energy source for colonocytes, regulate gut pH, reinforce tight-junction integrity, and exert systemic anti-inflammatory effects through the inhibition of histone deacetylases and activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPR41, GPR43) [21]. These mechanisms collectively promote intestinal barrier function and immune homeostasis.
Dysregulation of the microbiota—termed dysbiosis—is associated with numerous pathologies, including inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and neurodegenerative disorders [22]. Thus, dietary modulation of microbiota composition represents a promising strategy for disease prevention and health promotion.

4. Mechanistic Interplay Between Polyphenols and Gut Microbiota

The relationship between polyphenols and gut microbiota is profoundly bidirectional and synergistic [23]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that polyphenol-rich diets increase microbial diversity, richness, and β-diversity, indicators of a stable and resilient gut ecosystem [24,25]. For instance, grape proanthocyanidins enhance the abundance of Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia, correlating with improved intestinal barrier function, lower intestinal permeability, and reduced systemic inflammation [26]. Similarly, catechins and quercetin modulate the microbiota by stimulating SCFA-producing bacteria and suppressing inflammatory Proteobacteria [27].
The mechanisms underlying these effects involve both direct antimicrobial actions and indirect ecological modulation. Polyphenols can disrupt bacterial membranes [28], inhibit quorum sensing [29], or deprive pathogens of essential nutrients such as iron [30], while simultaneously supporting beneficial commensals through metabolic cross-feeding and modulation of redox balance [31].
Mechanistically, polyphenols modulate the microbiota through antimicrobial effects, including inhibition of bacterial enzymes, which preferentially impact pathogenic species such as Clostridium difficile and Escherichia coli [32]. Additionally, polyphenols influence microbial metabolism by altering redox conditions and promoting cross-feeding networks that enhance SCFA production [31]. Collectively, these actions position polyphenols as prebiotic-like compounds capable of reshaping microbial communities and promoting a eubiotic state associated with metabolic, inflammatory, and immunological benefits [33].
Microbiota shifts induced by polyphenols have downstream impacts on metabolic, immune, and inflammatory pathways. Increased SCFA production enhances energy metabolism and insulin sensitivity, while reduced lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels mitigate systemic inflammation [34]. Additionally, enrichment of Akkermansia muciniphila—a mucin-degrading bacterium linked to improved metabolic profiles—has been consistently observed in response to flavonoid and resveratrol intake [35]. For example, green tea catechins have been shown to enhance propionate-producing Bacteroides while reducing endotoxin-producing Proteobacteria, linking polyphenol intake to improved metabolic health (Figure 3) [36].

Microbial Biotransformation of Polyphenols

The gut microbiota plays an essential role in unlocking the bioactivity of polyphenols through enzymatic conversion into low-molecular-weight metabolites. Microbial enzymes catalyze a range of reactions—hydrolysis, reduction, decarboxylation, demethylation, and ring cleavage—yielding metabolites with greater solubility and systemic availability. Only 5–10% of polyphenols are absorbed in the small intestine: the remainder undergo microbial metabolism in the colon to generate bioactive products. Table 1 highlights that the health effects attributed to dietary polyphenols are largely mediated by their microbial-derived metabolites rather than by the parent compounds themselves.
This underscores the pivotal role of the gut microbiota in shaping polyphenol bioactivity, clinical relevance, and interindividual variability in nutritional responses. In fact, following ingestion, most polyphenols reach the colon in an unmetabolized or partially metabolised form, where they are subjected to a wide range of microbiota-driven reactions. These processes markedly influence polyphenol bioavailability and biological activity.
Flavanols, together with proanthocyanidins, are primarily converted into phenolic acids and phenyl-γ-valerolactones, metabolites that have been linked to antioxidant and cardioprotective effects [45]. Flavonols, flavones, and flavanones mainly undergo deglycosylation and ring fission, yielding low-molecular-weight phenolic acids that contribute to anti-inflammatory and vasoprotective activities. Anthocyanins, which are inherently unstable in the gastrointestinal tract, are rapidly degraded into phenolic acids such as protocatechuic acid, supporting vascular health [46].
Isoflavones exemplify the strong interaction between diet and gut microbiota, as their microbial conversion into equol or O-desmethylangolensin leads to substantial interindividual variability in estrogenic and cardiometabolic responses [47]. Dietary lignans are metabolised into bioactive enterolignans, notably enterodiol and enterolactone, which are associated with hormonal modulation, antioxidant activity, and potential anticancer effects [48,49]. Stilbenes, including resveratrol, are transformed into dihydroresveratrol, a more stable metabolite with relevant cardioprotective and metabolic regulatory properties [50].
Curcuminoids are predominantly reduced and hydrogenated by gut microbiota, resulting in the formation of tetrahydrocurcumin, a metabolite with enhanced anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective potential [51]. Finally, ellagitannins, a subclass of hydrolysable tannins, are converted into urolithins, compounds extensively studied for their beneficial effects on gut health, mitochondrial function, and metabolic regulation [52].
This microbial transformation thus reconciles the apparent paradox between polyphenols’ poor absorption and their potent systemic effects. The microbiota effectively acts as a metabolic amplifier, converting dietary precursors into functional postbiotics that interact with host cells.
These microbiota-mediated effects extend beyond the gut, influencing the gut–liver [53], gut–brain [54], and gut–immune axes [55]. For example, microbial metabolites derived from polyphenols can cross the intestinal barrier and act on distant organs, contributing to cardiovascular protection, neuroprotection, and immune regulation [56].

5. Molecular Pathways and Host Systemic Effects

The bioactive metabolites generated through microbial transformation of polyphenols exert a wide range of regulatory actions on host physiology by targeting key molecular pathways involved in inflammation, oxidative stress, energy metabolism, cellular homeostasis, epithelial integrity and epigenetic remodeling.

5.1. Modulation of Nrf2

The Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2) –Keap1 axis is one of the primary targets of polyphenol-derived metabolites [57]. Compounds such as urolithin A, dihydroresveratrol, and phenyl-γ-valerolactones modify reactive cysteine residues on Keap1 or alter cellular redox tone, leading to the release of Nrf2 from the Keap1 complex, preventing the ubiquitin-mediated degradation, and nuclear accumulation and binding to ARE (antioxidant response elements) [58]. This induces a broad cytoprotective program encompassing antioxidant enzyme activity (HO-1, NQO1, SOD, GPx), phase II detoxification enzymes, glutathione synthesis, and mitochondrial biogenesis through crosstalk with PGC1-α [59].
Nrf2 activation also indirectly suppresses inflammatory signaling by reducing ROS-dependent NF-κB activation and supports redox balance, mitochondrial integrity, and epithelial resilience, particularly within the gastrointestinal tract [60].

5.2. Modulation of NF-κB and the Inflammatory Cascade

Polyphenol metabolites attenuate chronic inflammation by interfering with NF-κB (nuclear factor-kappa B) signaling cascade at multiple regulatory checkpoints: (a) inhibition of IKK complex activity [61], preventing IκBα phosphorylation and degradation, lowering the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, COX-2) [62,63]; (b) reduction in ROS-mediated NF-κB activation, due to improved antioxidant buffering [64]; (c) epigenetic downregulation of pro-inflammatory genes through HDAC inhibition and altered histone acetylation patterns [65]; (d) suppression of TLR4 signaling, following reduced LPS translocation associated with improved gut barrier function [66].
Downstream consequences include lowered transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β), chemokines (MCP-1), and enzymes such as COX-2 and iNOS [67]. This contributes to systemic reductions in low-grade inflammation central to obesity, cardiometabolic disease, and gut inflammatory disorders.

5.3. AMPK Activation and Metabolic Reprogramming

A third fundamental target is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a master regulator of cellular energy homeostasis. Several microbial metabolites activate AMPK in metabolic tissues, enhancing fatty acid oxidation, improving glucose uptake, increasing mitochondrial biogenesis, and reducing hepatic lipogenesis [68]. Through these effects, the polyphenol–microbiota axis influences body weight regulation, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism. Microbial metabolites dihydroresveratrol and phenyl-γ-valerolactones, regulate energy homeostasis through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). The mechanisms of action include:
  • increased AMP/ATP ratio via mitochondrial hormesis;
  • direct phosphorylation of AMPKα subunit by upstream kinases (LKB1, CaMKKβ) [69];
  • improved mitochondrial efficiency and reduced oxidative burden, reducing ATP waste [70].
AMPK activation orchestrates a global metabolic shift: it stimulates fatty acid oxidation via ACC inhibition [71]; enhances glucose uptake through GLUT4 translocation [72]; reduce hepatic gluconeogenesis [73]; inhibits lipogenesis via downregulation of SREBP-1c [74]; and stimulates autophagy through ULK1 activation [75].
This pathway links microbial metabolism of polyphenols to improved insulin sensitivity and metabolic health.

5.4. Endothelial and Immune Signaling

Endothelial and immune modulation are also another target of the polyphenol–microbiota interaction: phenolic metabolites enhance nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity, improving vascular tone and reducing oxidative LDL formation, while also regulating T-cell and macrophage activity through redox signaling. Polyphenol metabolites also modulate eNOS activation, increasing nitric oxide levels, leading to improved vascular function [76]; in addition, their action on tight junction expression (ZO-1, occludin, which is the target of urolithins) enhanced epithelial integrity [77]. It was demonstrated that pomegranate polyphenols directly suppress macrophage inflammatory responses and promote M1 to M2 switch in macrophages through redox- and AMPK-mediated mechanisms, leading to immune cell polarization [78]. Gut phenolic metabolites, particularly phenolic acids, can modulate AhR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) activation, influencing immune tolerance and barrier repair [79].

5.5. Epigenetic and Mitochondrial Mechanisms

Emerging evidence shows that metabolites such as urolithin A are able to regulate mitochondrial quality control via mitophagy activation (PINK1/Parkin) [80], chromatin remodeling through inhibition of class I/II histone deacetylases (HDACs) [81], and microRNA expression associated with inflammatory and metabolic regulation [82]. These epigenetic and mitochondrial effects provide a durable link between diet, microbiota metabolism, and host phenotypes.
The combined activation of Nrf2, inhibition of NF-κB, and metabolic reprogramming via AMPK, together with endothelial, immune, and epigenetic modulation, forms a multi-layered mechanistic framework explaining the broad systemic benefits of polyphenol-rich diets (Figure 4). This network demonstrates how microbial metabolism transforms poorly absorbed dietary compounds into potent signaling molecules that influence host health across multiple organs and systems.
Together, these pathways establish the polyphenol–microbiota–host axis as a critical determinant of systemic antioxidant capacity, immune balance, and metabolic homeostasis. The mechanistic interplay between polyphenols and the gut microbiota represents a symbiotic biochemical network that sustains host health (Figure 4). Microbial diversity ensures efficient polyphenol metabolism, while dietary polyphenols act as microbial modulators capable of reshaping the intestinal ecosystem toward a eubiotic state that favors host health—forming a reciprocal feedback loop essential for metabolic, cardiovascular, and immune regulation.

6. Dietary Influence, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Implications

Diet plays a central role in shaping both polyphenol availability and the composition of the gut microbiota, making dietary patterns a key determinant of the polyphenol–microbiota axis [83]. Diets rich in fruits, vegetables, tea, coffee, red wine, and whole grains provide abundant sources of polyphenols, which interact with the intestinal microbiota to generate beneficial metabolites [84]. Conversely, Western-style diets—high in saturated fats and refined carbohydrates—are typically low in polyphenols and associated with dysbiosis, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction [85,86]. Regular consumption of polyphenol-rich diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, promotes microbial diversity and enriches beneficial taxa like Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Akkermansia muciniphila [87]. These shifts correlate with increased production of SCFAs, improved mucosal barrier integrity, and reduced circulating inflammatory markers.
Emerging evidence suggests that synergistic effects between polyphenols and dietary fiber enhance these outcomes: fibers provide fermentable substrates, while polyphenols modulate microbial composition, together fostering a resilient, health-promoting microbiota [88].
Clinical trials investigating polyphenols, gut microbiota, and disease prevention have begun to reveal promising insights into the therapeutic potential of polyphenol-rich diets in managing and preventing chronic diseases [89,90]. However, given the complexity of polyphenol–microbiota interactions, rigorous, large-scale clinical studies are still needed to fully understand these effects [91]. Recent trials have explored the impact of specific polyphenols, such as resveratrol, curcumin, and catechins, on metabolic health, inflammatory conditions, and gut microbiota composition [92,93].
The use of resveratrol has shown improvements in insulin sensitivity and reductions in inflammatory markers in individuals with type 2 diabetes, outcomes that are linked to favorable shifts in gut microbiota composition, including increased levels of beneficial bacteria like Akkermansia muciniphila [94]. Similarly, clinical studies examining the effects of curcumin in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have reported reductions in gut inflammation and symptomatic relief, likely due to curcumin’s impact on the microbiota and its anti-inflammatory properties [93]. Catechins, especially from green tea, have also been investigated in clinical trials for their potential to lower cholesterol levels and blood pressure, with results suggesting that these effects are mediated in part by the microbiota’s transformation of catechins into bioactive metabolites that promote cardiovascular health [95].
Clinical evidence also supports the role of polyphenols in modulating gut microbiota. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving healthy obese adults, the effects of a polyphenol-rich cranberry beverage on intestinal permeability and gut microbiota were examined. After two weeks of treatment, the abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Eggerthella lenta increased, while Bifidobacterium spp. decreased [96]. These findings demonstrate that polyphenols can alter gut microbiota composition in humans. Supplementation with resveratrol, anthocyanin-rich berries, or grape polyphenols increased insulin sensitivity, lowered fasting glucose, and modulated gut microbiota toward a higher Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio.
Trials on polyphenol-rich diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, have additionally shown significant reductions in cardiovascular and cancer risks, partly attributed to the high intake of polyphenols and their positive modulation of the gut microbiota [97]. Intervention studies with green tea catechins and cocoa flavanols have shown improved endothelial function and reduced blood pressure, associated with elevated levels of Akkermansia muciniphila and enhanced NO-mediated vasodilation [98]. Curcumin and quercetin supplementation have reduced intestinal inflammation, improved gut permeability, and increased beneficial Lactobacillus species in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [99]. Polyphenol metabolites (e.g., urolithin A, tetrahydrocurcumin) attenuated markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with mild cognitive impairment, implicating gut–brain axis modulation, suggesting a neuroprotective effect. Two different clinical studies in healthy subjects have shown that supplementation with 7 targeted probiotic strains plus leaf extract of Lagerstroemia speciosa improved glycemic control [100], and by using probiotics in combination with prebiotic fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and Echinacea improved stress response and inflammation markers [101].
Nevertheless, the efficacy of prebiotic and probiotic supplementation in routine clinical settings has not yet been definitively established. Although the available evidence appears encouraging, the clinical studies discussed above frequently yield inconclusive and, at times, conflicting results. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study, which included nearly half a million participants from 10 European countries, reported an inverse association between polyphenol intake and colon cancer risk in men [102]. However, the same study found no association between dietary polyphenol intake and the risk of differentiated thyroid cancer or overall colorectal cancer [102]. In contrast, a positive association between polyphenol intake and rectal cancer was observed in women [102]. Such variability may be attributed to multiple factors, including limitations in study design, insufficient sample sizes, and the possibility that observed associations reflect simple correlations rather than causal effects.
A search of the clinicaltrials.gov database using the words “prebiotics and probiotics” reveals 252 studies; however, only 4% (11 studies) reported any results [103]. Expanding the search to only the terms “prebiotic” or “probiotic”, we find 637 and 2636 clinical studies, respectively, but the percentage of studies that led to results remains substantially unchanged [104,105]. In the absence of more robust experimental and clinical evidence, supplementation may represent a supportive intervention; however, it should be integrated within a personalized therapeutic strategy rather than regarded as a universal alternative to conventional pharmacological treatments.
These clinical trials highlight the importance of understanding individual differences in microbiota composition and the need for personalized approaches in future studies. Researchers are increasingly focusing on the potential of microbiota-targeted therapies, such as probiotics or prebiotics, in conjunction with polyphenol-rich diets, to enhance treatment outcomes [106]. Ongoing and future clinical trials will be essential in establishing standardized guidelines for polyphenol intake, determining optimal dosages, and clarifying the long-term health benefits of polyphenol–microbiota interactions in disease prevention [91].

Translational Implications: Toward Personalized and Microbiota-Targeted Nutrition

The growing body of clinical and omics-based data underscores the potential of polyphenol-rich diets as microbiota-targeted therapies. However, substantial inter-individual variability in microbial composition leads to differences in metabolite production and therapeutic efficacy. These differences support the emerging field of precision nutrition, where polyphenol intake and combinations can be optimized based on a person’s microbiome signature. Metagenomic and metabolomic profiling may soon enable the prediction of individual responses to specific polyphenol interventions, facilitating personalized dietary recommendations for chronic disease prevention.
Future strategies may combine novel microbiota-targeted approaches—such as co-administration of probiotics, prebiotics, or postbiotics—may enhance polyphenol metabolism and bioefficacy, opening new frontiers in nutritional therapeutics. For instance, administering Bifidobacterium adolescentis alongside ellagitannin-rich foods could increase urolithin production [107], whereas supplementation with butyrate-producing bacteria may potentiate SCFA-mediated benefits [108].
However, the clinical translation of polyphenols-microbiota coadministration is not an easy task: many existing trials are short-term or small-scale, with short follow-up periods, heterogeneous outcomes, and limited external validation. Large, controlled studies with standardized polyphenol doses and well-characterized microbiota endpoints are required to establish causality and inform evidence-based dietary recommendations. At the same time, multi-omics analyses and continuous digital monitoring remain costly and operationally demanding, while many clinicians lack training to interpret omics-based outputs. Targeting clinician education is mandatory to ensure that digital health and personalized nutrition recommendations are interpretable, actionable, and consistent with routine care.
Clinical translation will further depend on demonstrating clear added value by using clinically meaningful and measurable endpoints, supported by external validation prior to adoption. Consensus guidelines emphasize that implementation should favor clinician-oriented decision support that delivers interpretable, guideline-aligned recommendations with explicit uncertainty, rather than exhaustive taxonomic outputs.
In this regard, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an increasingly prominent technology in healthcare, with significant potential to reshape clinical nutrition. It can support the analysis of complex datasets and the delivery of personalized nutritional interventions. AI may help clinicians make more informed decisions about nutritional needs, disease prevention, and treatment strategies [109]. By processing large volumes of data, AI algorithms can uncover new relationships between dietary patterns and health outcomes, supporting evidence-based nutritional guidance. In addition, AI-driven tools and applications can help monitor dietary intake and offer real-time feedback. Despite these advantages, the use of AI in clinical nutrition raises ethical and regulatory issues, including concerns about data privacy and algorithmic bias. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AI-based nutritional interventions. Overall, while AI holds considerable promise for advancing clinical nutrition, its implementation in practice must be carefully supervised to ensure patient safety and positive outcomes. Artificial intelligence could be an incredible tool to analyze big data and find consistent and useful clinical therapies.
Finally, feasibility, privacy, and equity must be integral to system design. The strong geographic bias of public microbiome datasets—heavily skewed toward Western, high-income populations—limits generalizability and risks exacerbating health disparities if tools are deployed without validation in diverse populations. At the same time, the convergence of microbiome profiling with sensitive omics and digital phenotypes heightens governance and privacy concerns, particularly in commercial or cross-institutional contexts.
In summary, clinical and translational studies collectively demonstrate that polyphenols act as dietary modulators of the gut microbiome, influencing human health through metabolite-mediated signaling. Harnessing this interplay through personalized nutritional strategies offers a promising route for preventing and managing chronic diseases.

7. Discussions and Future Perspectives

Polyphenols represent one of the most promising classes of bioactive dietary compounds, exerting wide-ranging effects on human health through their reciprocal relationship with the gut microbiota. The polyphenol–microbiota–metabolite axis functions as a dynamic system that translates dietary inputs into molecular and metabolic signals governing oxidative balance, immune modulation, and metabolic homeostasis. The interaction between polyphenols and intestinal microbes constitutes a bidirectional feedback loop: polyphenols shape microbial composition toward a eubiotic state, while the microbiota metabolizes them into bioactive derivatives with amplified physiological effects. This interdependence provides a mechanistic explanation for how dietary diversity and polyphenol intake can modulate systemic health and prevent chronic disease, bridging nutrition, microbiology, and molecular physiology.
Despite substantial progress, several challenges remain before these findings can be fully translated into dietary guidelines or therapeutic strategies: firstly, the inter-individual variability has to be considered. Differences in microbiota composition result in heterogeneous metabolic capacities for polyphenol biotransformation. Identifying microbial biomarkers predictive of high or low metabolite production (e.g., urolithin A producers) is essential for designing personalized interventions [110].
The intricate signaling networks linking microbial metabolites to host molecular targets still remain incompletely mapped. Advanced multi-omics integration combining metagenomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics will be crucial for elucidating these pathways.
The convergence of nutritional science, microbiome research, and data-driven omics heralds the emergence of precision nutrition—a paradigm in which dietary recommendations are tailored to individual microbial and metabolic profiles [111]. By mapping how distinct microbiota configurations influence polyphenol metabolism, clinicians and nutritionists will be able to customize dietary interventions to maximize therapeutic benefit [112].
Finally, integrated multi-omics approaches connect microbial composition, metabolite profiles, and host physiological responses, enabling causal inference and the development of predictive models of polyphenol responsiveness [113]. This systems-level perspective supports the advancement of precision nutrition, allowing tailored dietary interventions based on an individual’s microbiome and metabolic signatures. By bridging microbial ecology, molecular mechanisms, and clinical phenotypes, omics technologies offer a powerful framework for understanding and optimizing the health benefits associated with polyphenol–microbiota interactions (Figure 5) [114].
Future research integrating artificial intelligence and personalized metabolomics will enable predictive models linking dietary polyphenol intake to measurable health outcomes; such approaches could redefine dietary management of chronic diseases through microbiome-informed precision nutrition strategies. Advances in multi-omics technologies—including metagenomics, metabolomics, and transcriptomics—allow for precise mapping of polyphenol-derived metabolites and their symbiotic interactions with the host [115,116]. Furthermore, inter-individual differences in microbiota composition introduce substantial variability in polyphenol metabolism, underscoring the importance of personalized nutrition strategies aimed at optimizing health outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and R.A.; methodology, S.N.B. and S.C.; data curation, M.E.B. and F.M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. and R.A.; writing—review and editing, A.D.R. and M.B.; visualization, S.S., L.L.M. and S.N.B.; supervision, R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hossain, M.S.; Wazed, M.A.; Asha, S.; Amin, M.R.; Shimul, I.M. Dietary Phytochemicals in Health and Disease: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 13, e70101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tangney, C.; Rasmussen, H.E. Polyphenols, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2013, 15, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chiva-Blanch, G.; Badimon, L. Effects of Polyphenol Intake on Metabolic Syndrome: Current Evidences from Human Trials. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 5812401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aryaeian, N.; Sedehi, S.K.; Arablou, T. Polyphenols and their effects on diabetes management: A review. Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran 2017, 31, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arias-Sanchez, R.A.; Torner, L.; Fenton Navarro, B. Polyphenols and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Potential Effects and Mechanisms of Neuroprotection. Molecules 2023, 28, 5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhosale, P.B.; Ha, S.E.; Vetrivel, P.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, G.S. Functions of polyphenols and its anticancer properties in biomedical research: A narrative review. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 7619–7631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rahman, S.; O’Connor, A.L.; Becker, S.L.; Patel, R.K.; Martindale, R.G.; Tsikitis, V.L. Gut microbial metabolites and its impact on human health. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2023, 36, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marchesi, J.R.; Adams, D.H.; Fava, F.; Hermes, G.D.A.; Hirschfield, G.M.; Hold, G.; Quraishi, M.N.; Kinross, J.; Smidt, H.; Tuohy, K.M.; et al. The gut microbiota and host health: A new clinical frontier. Gut 2016, 65, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Qi, Y.; Zheng, H. Dietary Polyphenol, Gut Microbiota, and Health Benefits. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dinu, L.-D.; Vamanu, E. Gut Microbiota Modulators Based on Polyphenols Extracted from Winery By-Products and Their Applications in the Nutraceutical Industry. Life 2024, 14, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Singla, R.K.; Dubey, A.K.; Garg, A.; Sharma, R.K.; Fiorino, M.; Ameen, S.M.; Haddad, M.A.; Al-Hiary, M. Natural Polyphenols: Chemical Classification, Definition of Classes, Subcategories, and Structures. J. AOAC Int. 2019, 102, 1397–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manach, C.; Williamson, G.; Morand, C.; Scalbert, A.; Rémésy, C. Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 230S–242S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nemzer, B.V.; Al-Taher, F.; Kalita, D.; Yashin, A.Y.; Yashin, Y.I. Health-Improving Effects of Polyphenols on the Human Intestinal Microbiota: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lu, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, X.; Zi, Y.; Xiao, X. Biotransformation of Phenolic Acids in Foods: Pathways, Key Enzymes, and Technological Applications. Foods 2025, 14, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalog established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martin, A.M.; Sun, E.W.; Rogers, G.B.; Keating, D.J. The Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Host Metabolism Through the Regulation of Gut Hormone Release. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klosowski, E.M.; de Souza, B.T.L.; Mito, M.S.; Constantin, R.P.; Mantovanelli, G.C.; Mewes, J.M.; Bizerra, P.F.V.; Menezes, P.V.M.d.C.; Gilglioni, E.H.; Utsunomiya, K.S.; et al. The photodynamic and direct actions of methylene blue on mitochondrial energy metabolism: A balance of the useful and harmful effects of this photosensitizer. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 153, 34–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nash, M.J.; Frank, D.N.; Friedman, J.E. Early Microbes Modify Immune System Development and Metabolic Homeostasis—The “Restaurant” Hypothesis Revisited. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. O’Riordan, K.J.; Moloney, G.M.; Keane, L.; Clarke, G.; Cryan, J.F. The gut microbiota-immune-brain axis: Therapeutic implications. Cell Rep. Med. 2025, 6, 101982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morrison, D.J.; Preston, T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, M.; Lu, Y.; Xue, G.; Han, L.; Jia, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Yang, C.; Zhou, Y. Role of short-chain fatty acids in host physiology. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2024, 7, 641–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Acevedo-Román, A.; Pagán-Zayas, N.; Velázquez-Rivera, L.I.; Torres-Ventura, A.C.; Godoy-Vitorino, F. Insights into Gut Dysbiosis: Inflammatory Diseases, Obesity, and Restoration Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cano, R.; Bermúdez, V.; Galban, N.; Garrido, B.; Santeliz, R.; Gotera, M.P.; Duran, P.; Boscan, A.; Carbonell-Zabaleta, A.-K.; Durán-Agüero, S.; et al. Dietary Polyphenols and Gut Microbiota Cross-Talk: Molecular and Therapeutic Perspectives for Cardiometabolic Disease: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meiners, F.; Ortega-Matienzo, A.; Fuellen, G.; Barrantes, I. Gut microbiome-mediated health effects of fiber and polyphenol-rich dietary interventions. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1647740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. González-Gómez, Á.; Cantone, M.; García-Muñoz, A.M.; Victoria-Montesinos, D.; Lucas-Abellán, C.; Serrano-Martínez, A.; Muñoz-Morillas, A.M.; Morillas-Ruiz, J.M. Effect of Polyphenol-Rich Interventions on Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory or Oxidative Stress Markers in Adults Who Are Overweight or Obese: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Redondo-Castillejo, R.; Garcimartín, A.; Hernández-Martín, M.; López-Oliva, M.E.; Bocanegra, A.; Macho-González, A.; Bastida, S.; Benedí, J.; Sánchez-Muniz, F.J. Proanthocyanidins: Impact on Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Action Mechanisms in the Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; He, Z. Quercetin and Its Metabolites: Mechanistic Insights as the Basis of Their Therapeutic Potential in NAFLD and HCC. Molecules 2025, 30, 4441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sun, S.; Liu, Z.; Lin, M.; Gao, N.; Wang, X. Polyphenols in health and food processing: Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant insights. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1456730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mostafa, I.; Abbas, H.A.; Ashour, M.L.; Yasri, A.; El-Shazly, A.M.; Wink, M.; Sobeh, M. Polyphenols from Salix tetrasperma Impair Virulence and Inhibit Quorum Sensing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Molecules 2020, 25, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scarano, A.; Laddomada, B.; Blando, F.; De Santis, S.; Verna, G.; Chieppa, M.; Santino, A. The Chelating Ability of Plant Polyphenols Can Affect Iron Homeostasis and Gut Microbiota. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scott, M.B.; Styring, A.K.; McCullagh, J.S.O. Polyphenols: Bioavailability, Microbiome Interactions and Cellular Effects on Health in Humans and Animals. Pathogens 2022, 11, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ballini, A.; Scacco, S.; Boccellino, M.; Santacroce, L.; Arrigoni, R. Microbiota and Obesity: Where Are We Now? Biology 2020, 9, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  33. Selma, M.V.; Espín, J.C.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. Interaction between phenolics and gut microbiota: Role in human health. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6485–6501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Laparra, J.M.; Sanz, Y. Interactions of gut microbiota with functional food components and nutraceuticals. Pharmacol. Res. 2010, 61, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Anhê, F.F.; Pilon, G.; Roy, D.; Desjardins, Y.; Levy, E.; Marette, A. Triggering Akkermansia with dietary polyphenols: A new weapon to combat the metabolic syndrome? Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, S.; Xu, M.; Sun, X.; Shi, H.; Zhu, J. Green Tea Extract Alters Gut Microbiota and their Metabolism of Adults with Metabolic Syndrome in a Host-free Human Colonic Model. Food Res. Int. 2022, 160, 111762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Selma, M.V.; Espín, J.C. Interactions of gut microbiota with dietary polyphenols and consequences to human health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2016, 19, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stevens, J.F.; Maier, C.S. The Chemistry of Gut Microbial Metabolism of Polyphenols. Phytochem. Rev. Proc. Phytochem. Soc. Eur. 2016, 15, 425–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cardona, F.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Tulipani, S.; Tinahones, F.J.; Queipo-Ortuño, M.I. Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alqudah, S.; Claesen, J. Mechanisms of gut bacterial metabolism of dietary polyphenols into bioactive compounds. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2426614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Márquez Campos, E.; Stehle, P.; Simon, M.-C. Microbial Metabolites of Flavan-3-Ols and Their Biological Activity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Feng, W.; Liu, J.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, D.; Tan, Y.; Peng, C. Dietary compounds in modulation of gut microbiota-derived metabolites. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 939571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mingshu, L.; Kai, Y.; Qiang, H.; Dongying, J. Biodegradation of gallotannins and ellagitannins. J. Basic Microbiol. 2006, 46, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Landete, J.M. Ellagitannins, ellagic acid and their derived metabolites: A review about source, metabolism, functions and health. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1150–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chagas, M.S.S.; Behrens, M.D.; Moragas-Tellis, C.J.; Penedo, G.X.M.; Silva, A.R.; Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, C.F. Flavonols and Flavones as Potential anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Compounds. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 9966750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Evans, P.C.; Little, P.J.; Tian, X.; Weng, J.; Xu, S. Anthocyanins in Vascular Health and Disease: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Potential. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2024, 84, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Leonard, L.M.; Choi, M.S.; Cross, T.-W.L. Maximizing the Estrogenic Potential of Soy Isoflavones through the Gut Microbiome: Implication for Cardiometabolic Health in Postmenopausal Women. Nutrients 2022, 14, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jang, W.Y.; Kim, M.-Y.; Cho, J.Y. Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Menopausal, and Anti-Cancer Effects of Lignans and Their Metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. De Silva, S.F.; Alcorn, J. Flaxseed Lignans as Important Dietary Polyphenols for Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Chemistry, Pharmacokinetics, and Molecular Targets. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brás, L.P.; Luís, Â.; Chatel, G.; Socorro, S.; Duarte, A.P. Stilbenes from Vine Extracts: Therapeutic Potential and Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lehoczki, A.; Fekete, M.; Jarecsny, T.; Zábó, V.; Szappanos, Á.; Csípő, T.; Lipécz, Á.; Major, D.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Varga, P.; et al. The Neuroprotective Role of Curcumin: From Molecular Pathways to Clinical Translation—A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Song, H.; Yun, C.; Choi, Y.J.; Jeong, W.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.Y.; Ryu, D.; Park, S.-W.; Oh, C.-M. Urolithin A Restores Mitochondrial Function and Reverses Cardiac Remodeling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. bioRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, C.; Cai, C.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, B.; Huang, Z. Gut microbiota-mediated gut-liver axis: A breakthrough point for understanding and treating liver cancer. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2025, 31, 350–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chaudhry, T.S.; Senapati, S.G.; Gadam, S.; Mannam, H.P.S.S.; Voruganti, H.V.; Abbasi, Z.; Abhinav, T.; Challa, A.B.; Pallipamu, N.; Bheemisetty, N.; et al. The Impact of Microbiota on the Gut–Brain Axis: Examining the Complex Interplay and Implications. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Park, J.C.; Chang, L.; Kwon, H.-K.; Im, S.-H. Beyond the gut: Decoding the gut–immune–brain axis in health and disease. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2025, 22, 1287–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Man, A.W.C.; Zhou, Y.; Xia, N.; Li, H. Involvement of Gut Microbiota, Microbial Metabolites and Interaction with Polyphenol in Host Immunometabolism. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, D.-Y.; Song, M.-Y.; Kim, E.-H. Role of Oxidative Stress and Nrf2/KEAP1 Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives with Phytochemicals. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lou, L.; Wang, M.; He, J.; Yang, S.; Meng, F.; Wang, S.; Jin, X.; Cai, J.; Cai, C. Urolithin A (UA) attenuates ferroptosis in LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice by upregulating Keap1-Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1067402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Roussos, A.; Kitopoulou, K.; Borbolis, F.; Ploumi, C.; Gianniou, D.D.; Li, Z.; He, H.; Tsakiri, E.; Borland, H.; Kostakis, I.K.; et al. Urolithin A modulates inter-organellar communication via calcium-dependent mitophagy to promote healthy ageing. Autophagy 2025, 12, 3097–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Saha, S.; Buttari, B.; Panieri, E.; Profumo, E.; Saso, L. An Overview of Nrf2 Signaling Pathway and Its Role in Inflammation. Molecules 2020, 25, 5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bucciantini, M.; Leri, M.; Nardiello, P.; Casamenti, F.; Stefani, M. Olive Polyphenols: Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Properties. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yu, C.; Wang, D.; Yang, Z.; Wang, T. Pharmacological Effects of Polyphenol Phytochemicals on the Intestinal Inflammation via Targeting TLR4/NF-κB Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Singh, A.; Yau, Y.F.; Leung, K.S.; El-Nezami, H.; Lee, J.C.-Y. Interaction of Polyphenols as Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Compounds in Brain–Liver–Gut Axis. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hussain, T.; Tan, B.; Yin, Y.; Blachier, F.; Tossou, M.C.B.; Rahu, N. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: What Polyphenols Can Do for Us? Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 7432797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rajendran, P.; Abdelsalam, S.A.; Renu, K.; Veeraraghavan, V.; Ben Ammar, R.; Ahmed, E.A. Polyphenols as Potent Epigenetics Agents for Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Du, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, W.; Yang, M.; Hou, C. Pomegranate peel polyphenols inhibits inflammation in LPS-induced RAW264.7 macrophages via the suppression of TLR4/NF-κB pathway activation. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 63, 10-29219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yahfoufi, N.; Alsadi, N.; Jambi, M.; Matar, C. The Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Role of Polyphenols. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Park, S.-G.; Kim, J.-W.; Song, J.H.; Kwon, S.-H.; Oh, S.-H.; Piao, X.; Wang, Z.; Ryu, J.-H.; Kim, N.; Kim, O.-S.; et al. The microbial metabolite imidazole propionate dysregulates bone homeostasis by inhibiting AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Moon, D.O. Plant-Derived Flavonoids as AMPK Activators: Unveiling Their Potential in Type 2 Diabetes Management through Mechanistic Insights, Docking Studies, and Pharmacokinetics. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Anchimowicz, J.; Zielonka, P.; Jakiela, S. Plant Secondary Metabolites as Modulators of Mitochondrial Health: An Overview of Their Anti-Oxidant, Anti-Apoptotic, and Mitophagic Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Foretz, M.; Even, P.C.; Viollet, B. AMPK Activation Reduces Hepatic Lipid Content by Increasing Fat Oxidation In Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yamaguchi, S.; Katahira, H.; Ozawa, S.; Nakamichi, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Shimoyama, T.; Takahashi, K.; Yoshimoto, K.; Imaizumi, M.O.; Nagamatsu, S.; et al. Activators of AMP-activated protein kinase enhance GLUT4 translocation and its glucose transport activity in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 289, E643–E649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Johanns, M.; Hue, L.; Rider, M.H. AMPK inhibits liver gluconeogenesis: Fact or fiction? Biochem. J. 2023, 480, 105–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Mihaylova, M.; Zheng, B.; Hou, X.; Jiang, B.; Park, O.; Luo, Z.; Lefai, E.; Shyy, J.Y.-J.; et al. AMPK Phosphorylates and Inhibits SREBP Activity to Attenuate Hepatic Steatosis and Atherosclerosis in Diet-induced Insulin Resistant Mice. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhao, M.; Klionsky, D.J. AMPK-dependent phosphorylation of ULK1 induces autophagy. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 119–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Das, M.; Devi, K.P.; Belwal, T.; Devkota, H.P.; Tewari, D.; Sahebnasagh, A.; Nabavi, S.F.; Khayat Kashani, H.R.; Rasekhian, M.; Xu, S.; et al. Harnessing polyphenol power by targeting eNOS for vascular diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 2093–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yasuda, T.; Takagi, T.; Asaeda, K.; Hashimoto, H.; Kajiwara, M.; Azuma, Y.; Kitae, H.; Hirai, Y.; Mizushima, K.; Doi, T.; et al. Urolithin A-mediated augmentation of intestinal barrier function through elevated secretory mucin synthesis. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Aharoni, S.; Lati, Y.; Aviram, M.; Fuhrman, B. Pomegranate juice polyphenols induce a phenotypic switch in macrophage polarization favoring a M2 anti-inflammatory state. BioFactors 2015, 41, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pinto, C.J.G.; Ávila-Gálvez, M.Á.; Lian, Y.; Moura-Alves, P.; Nunes dos Santos, C. Targeting the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by gut phenolic metabolites: A strategy towards gut inflammation. Redox Biol. 2023, 61, 102622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Faitg, J.; D’Amico, D.; Rinsch, C.; Singh, A. Mitophagy Activation by Urolithin A to Target Muscle Aging. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2024, 114, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gerhauser, C. Impact of dietary gut microbial metabolites on the epigenome. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 373, 20170359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Abdelazeem, K.N.M.; Kalo, M.Z.; Beer-Hammer, S.; Lang, F. The gut microbiota metabolite urolithin A inhibits NF-κB activation in LPS stimulated BMDMs. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yu, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, H. The impact of dietary patterns on gut microbiota for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review. Nutr. J. 2025, 24, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Plamada, D.; Vodnar, D.C. Polyphenols—Gut Microbiota Interrelationship: A Transition to a New Generation of Prebiotics. Nutrients 2021, 14, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Martinez, K.B.; Leone, V.; Chang, E.B. Western diets, gut dysbiosis, and metabolic diseases: Are they linked? Gut Microbes 2017, 8, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Severino, A.; Tohumcu, E.; Tamai, L.; Dargenio, P.; Porcari, S.; Rondinella, D.; Venturini, I.; Maida, M.; Gasbarrini, A.; Cammarota, G.; et al. The microbiome-driven impact of western diet in the development of noncommunicable chronic disorders. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2024, 72, 101923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Perrone, P.; D’Angelo, S. Gut Microbiota Modulation Through Mediterranean Diet Foods: Implications for Human Health. Nutrients 2025, 17, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cheng, B.; Feng, H.; Li, C.; Jia, F.; Zhang, X. The mutual effect of dietary fiber and polyphenol on gut microbiota: Implications for the metabolic and microbial modulation and associated health benefits. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 358, 123541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. El Oirdi, M. Harnessing the Power of Polyphenols: A New Frontier in Disease Prevention and Therapy. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rana, A.; Samtiya, M.; Dhewa, T.; Mishra, V.; Aluko, R.E. Health benefits of polyphenols: A concise review. J. Food Biochem. 2022, 46, e14264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Liu, X.; Alharbi, A.; Gibson, R.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A. (Poly)phenol-gut microbiota interactions and their impact on human health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2025, 28, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Prakash, V.; Bose, C.; Sunilkumar, D.; Cherian, R.M.; Thomas, S.S.; Nair, B.G. Resveratrol as a Promising Nutraceutical: Implications in Gut Microbiota Modulation, Inflammatory Disorders, and Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ito, A.; Matsui, Y.; Takeshita, M.; Katashima, M.; Goto, C.; Kuriki, K. Gut microbiota-mediated associations of green tea and catechin intakes with glucose metabolism in individuals without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A four-season observational study with mediation analysis. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Walker, J.M.; Eckardt, P.; Aleman, J.O.; da Rosa, J.C.; Liang, Y.; Iizumi, T.; Etheve, S.; Blaser, M.J.; Breslow, J.L.; Holt, P.R. The effects of trans-resveratrol on insulin resistance, inflammation, and microbiota in men with the metabolic syndrome: A pilot randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Transl. Res. 2018, 4, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, Y.; Xia, H.; Yu, J.; Sui, J.; Pan, D.; Wang, S.; Liao, W.; Yang, L.; Sun, G. Effects of green tea catechin on the blood pressure and lipids in overweight and obese population-a meta-analysis. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Solch-Ottaiano, R.J.; Judkins, T.C.; Matott, S.H.; McDermott, C.E.; Nieves, C.; Wang, Y.; Colee, J.; Tagliamonte, M.S.; Dissanayake, U.; Mai, V.; et al. High polyphenolic cranberry beverage alters specific fecal microbiota but not gut permeability following aspirin challenge in healthy obese adults: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 99, 105332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rodríguez-Daza, M.C.; Pulido-Mateos, E.C.; Lupien-Meilleur, J.; Guyonnet, D.; Desjardins, Y.; Roy, D. Polyphenol-Mediated Gut Microbiota Modulation: Toward Prebiotics and Further. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 689456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Godos, J.; Romano, G.L.; Laudani, S.; Gozzo, L.; Guerrera, I.; Dominguez Azpíroz, I.; Martínez Diaz, R.; Quiles, J.L.; Battino, M.; Drago, F.; et al. Flavan-3-ols and Vascular Health: Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms of Action. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Burge, K.; Gunasekaran, A.; Eckert, J.; Chaaban, H. Curcumin and Intestinal Inflammatory Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms of Protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Signorini, L.; Ballini, A.; Arrigoni, R.; De Leonardis, F.; Saini, R.; Cantore, S.; De Vito, D.; Coscia, M.F.; Dipalma, G.; Santacroce, L.; et al. Evaluation of a Nutraceutical Product with Probiotics, Vitamin D, Plus Banaba Leaf Extracts (Lagerstroemia speciosa) in Glycemic Control. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2021, 21, 1356–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Inchingolo, F. Probiotics and EpiCor® in human health. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2019, 33, 1973–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zamora-Ros, R.; Cayssials, V.; Jenab, M.; Rothwell, J.A.; Fedirko, V.; Aleksandrova, K.; Tjønneland, A.; Kyrø, C.; Overvad, K.; Boutron-Ruault, M.-C.; et al. Dietary intake of total polyphenol and polyphenol classes and the risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2018, 33, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. ClinicalTrials.gov P&P. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?intr=Probiotics%20and%20Prebiotics&aggFilters=results:with (accessed on 11 February 2026).
  104. ClinicalTrials.gov Pre. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?intr=Prebiotics (accessed on 11 February 2026).
  105. ClinicalTrials.gov Pro. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?intr=Probiotics (accessed on 11 February 2026).
  106. Kadyan, S.; Park, G.; Singh, T.P.; Patoine, C.; Singar, S.; Heise, T.; Domeier, C.; Ray, C.; Kumar, M.; Behare, P.V.; et al. Microbiome-based therapeutics towards healthier aging and longevity. Genome Med. 2025, 17, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Napier, B.A.; Allegretti, J.R.; Feuerstadt, P.; Kelly, C.R.; Van Hise, N.W.; Jäger, R.; Kassam, Z.; Reid, G. Multi-Species Synbiotic Supplementation Enhances Gut Microbial Diversity, Increases Urolithin A and Butyrate Production, and Reduces Inflammation in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, W.; Ma, Q.; Li, Y.; Wei, L.; Zhang, Z.; Khan, A.; Khan, M.Z.; Wang, C. Butyrate Supplementation Improves Intestinal Health and Growth Performance in Livestock: A Review. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bond, A.; Mccay, K.; Lal, S. Artificial intelligence & clinical nutrition: What the future might have in store. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2023, 57, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Chen, J.; Siliceo, S.L.; Ni, Y.; Nielsen, H.B.; Xu, A.; Panagiotou, G. Identification of robust and generalizable biomarkers for microbiome-based stratification in lifestyle interventions. Microbiome 2023, 11, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mills, S.; Stanton, C.; Lane, J.A.; Smith, G.J.; Ross, R.P. Precision Nutrition and the Microbiome, Part I: Current State of the Science. Nutrients 2019, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mahdi, L.; Graziani, A.; Baffy, G.; Mitten, E.K.; Portincasa, P.; Khalil, M. Unlocking Polyphenol Efficacy: The Role of Gut Microbiota in Modulating Bioavailability and Health Effects. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chetty, A.; Blekhman, R. Multi-omic approaches for host-microbiome data integration. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2297860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, W.; Qi, S.; Xue, X.; Al Naggar, Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, K. Understanding the Gastrointestinal Protective Effects of Polyphenols using Foodomics-Based Approaches. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 671150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Arrigoni, R.; Ballini, A.; Santacroce, L.; Cantore, S.; Inchingolo, A.; Inchingolo, F.; Di Domenico, M.; Quagliuolo, L.; Boccellino, M. Another Look at Dietary Polyphenols: Challenges in Cancer Prevention and Treatment. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022, 29, 1061–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Boccellino, M.; Ambrosio, P.; Ballini, A.; De Vito, D.; Scacco, S.; Cantore, S.; Feola, A.; Di Donato, M.; Quagliuolo, L.; Sciarra, A.; et al. The Role of Curcumin in Prostate Cancer Cells and Derived Spheroids. Cancers 2022, 14, 3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of different polyphenols.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of different polyphenols.
Jpm 16 00142 g001
Figure 2. Gut microbiota composition. Diagram illustrating the phyla and their relative abundance in the human gut microbiota flora.
Figure 2. Gut microbiota composition. Diagram illustrating the phyla and their relative abundance in the human gut microbiota flora.
Jpm 16 00142 g002
Figure 3. Microbiota Modulation by Dietary Polyphenols. Unabsorbed polyphenols reach the colon, selectively stimulate beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Akkermansia), inhibit pathogenic taxa (Clostridium, E. coli), and enhance production of short-chain fatty acids (acetate, propionate, butyrate).
Figure 3. Microbiota Modulation by Dietary Polyphenols. Unabsorbed polyphenols reach the colon, selectively stimulate beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Akkermansia), inhibit pathogenic taxa (Clostridium, E. coli), and enhance production of short-chain fatty acids (acetate, propionate, butyrate).
Jpm 16 00142 g003
Figure 4. Molecular Pathways Activated by Polyphenol-Derived Metabolites. Integrated schematic illustrating how gut microbiota converts polyphenols into metabolites (urolithins, dihydroresveratrol, tetrahydrocurcumin) that activate Nrf2, inhibit NF-κB, and stimulate AMPK pathways. Downstream effects include reduced oxidative stress, improved lipid/glucose metabolism, and suppression of chronic inflammation.
Figure 4. Molecular Pathways Activated by Polyphenol-Derived Metabolites. Integrated schematic illustrating how gut microbiota converts polyphenols into metabolites (urolithins, dihydroresveratrol, tetrahydrocurcumin) that activate Nrf2, inhibit NF-κB, and stimulate AMPK pathways. Downstream effects include reduced oxidative stress, improved lipid/glucose metabolism, and suppression of chronic inflammation.
Jpm 16 00142 g004
Figure 5. Future Perspectives: Integrative Framework for Polyphenol–Microbiota–Health Research. A conceptual model illustrating the transition from basic mechanistic understanding to personalized interventions. Highlights multi-omics tools (metagenomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics), AI-based data integration, and translation into individualized nutritional guidelines.
Figure 5. Future Perspectives: Integrative Framework for Polyphenol–Microbiota–Health Research. A conceptual model illustrating the transition from basic mechanistic understanding to personalized interventions. Highlights multi-omics tools (metagenomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics), AI-based data integration, and translation into individualized nutritional guidelines.
Jpm 16 00142 g005
Table 1. Major classes of polyphenols, microbial transformations, representative metabolites, and main health effects.
Table 1. Major classes of polyphenols, microbial transformations, representative metabolites, and main health effects.
Polyphenol ClassPrincipal Microbial
Transformations
Representative Metabolites
FlavonolsDeglycosylation, dehydroxylation, ring fission [37]Phenolic acids, hydroxyphenylacetic acids
FlavonesDeglycosylation, demethylation [38]Phenolic acids
FlavanonesDeglycosylation, dihydroxylation [39]Phenylpropionic acids
IsoflavonesDeglycosylation, reduction [40]Equol, O-desmethylangolensin
AnthocyaninsDeglycosylation, ring cleavage [41] Protocatechuic acid,
phenolic acids
ProanthocyanidinsDepolymerisation, ring fission [42]Phenyl-γ-valerolactones
Tannins (condensed & hydrolysable)Hydrolysis, decarboxylation [43]Gallic acid, urolithins
ChalconesReduction, isomerization [44]Phenolic acids
StilbenesHydrogenation, dihydroxylation [44]Dihydroresveratrol
LignansDemethylation, dehydroxylation, dehydrogenation [43]Enterolactone, enterodiol
CurcuminoidsDemethylation, hydroxylation, reduction and acetylation [42]Tetrahydrocurcumin, dihydrocurcumin
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ballini, A.; Barile, S.N.; De Rosa, A.; Bizzoca, M.E.; Boccellino, M.; Scacco, S.; Cantore, S.; Lo Muzio, L.; Lasorsa, F.M.; Arrigoni, R. The Polyphenol–Microbiota Axis: Molecular Mechanisms, Metabolic Pathways, and Therapeutic Perspectives in Human Health. J. Pers. Med. 2026, 16, 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16030142

AMA Style

Ballini A, Barile SN, De Rosa A, Bizzoca ME, Boccellino M, Scacco S, Cantore S, Lo Muzio L, Lasorsa FM, Arrigoni R. The Polyphenol–Microbiota Axis: Molecular Mechanisms, Metabolic Pathways, and Therapeutic Perspectives in Human Health. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2026; 16(3):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16030142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ballini, Andrea, Simona Nicole Barile, Alfredo De Rosa, Maria Eleonora Bizzoca, Mariarosaria Boccellino, Salvatore Scacco, Stefania Cantore, Lorenzo Lo Muzio, Francesco Massimo Lasorsa, and Roberto Arrigoni. 2026. "The Polyphenol–Microbiota Axis: Molecular Mechanisms, Metabolic Pathways, and Therapeutic Perspectives in Human Health" Journal of Personalized Medicine 16, no. 3: 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16030142

APA Style

Ballini, A., Barile, S. N., De Rosa, A., Bizzoca, M. E., Boccellino, M., Scacco, S., Cantore, S., Lo Muzio, L., Lasorsa, F. M., & Arrigoni, R. (2026). The Polyphenol–Microbiota Axis: Molecular Mechanisms, Metabolic Pathways, and Therapeutic Perspectives in Human Health. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 16(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16030142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop