Next Article in Journal
Novel LRP6 Mutations Causing Non-Syndromic Oligodontia
Next Article in Special Issue
Ilizarov Bone Transfer for Treatment of Large Tibial Bone Defects: Clinical Results and Management of Complications
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of the Minnesota Assessment of Pharmacogenomic Literacy (MAPL)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improvement of Ocular Surface Disease by Lateral Tarsoconjunctival Flap in Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy Patients with Lid Retraction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects in the Distal Lower Extremity: Free Chain-Linked Bilateral Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flaps versus Extended Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flaps

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(9), 1400; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091400
by Jiqiang He 1, Gunel Guliyeva 2, Panfeng Wu 1, Liming Qing 1, Fang Yu 1 and Juyu Tang 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(9), 1400; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091400
Submission received: 26 June 2022 / Revised: 21 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 29 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Good Clinical Practice in Plastic Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

The subject of the study is very interesting.

I suggest you to improve the study method by establishing more clearly the indications and the criteria of choosing the surgical techniques used.

I suggest you, to show, eventually, the particularities of the cases according to which the use of one flap or other was chosen. 

The informations for authors regarding the writing of bibliographic indices in the manuscript must be reviewed

Author Response

RC 1. Dear authors, the subject of the study is very interesting. I suggest you to improve the study method by establishing more clearly the indications and the criteria for choosing the surgical techniques used.

Re: Thank you for your kind comment! We have elaborated on the inclusion criteria to make the study clear to readers.

RC 2. I suggest you, to show, eventually, the particularities of the cases according to which the use of one flap or other was chosen. 

Re: Thank you for your suggestion! Unfortunately, this is a limitation of our study. As this study has a retrospective design, we could not identify the reasons for the flap choice.

RC3.The information for authors regarding the writing of bibliographic indices in the manuscript must be reviewed

Re: Thank you for pointing this out! Reference has been revised.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors, 

Your manuscript has not the proper template for JPM. 

In addition your study is too similar with this one: 

He J, Qing L, Wu P et al. Large wounds reconstruction of the lower extremity with combined latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and flow-through anterolateral thigh perforator flap transfer. Microsurgery 2021; 41: 533-542.

 

Author Response

RC 1. Dear authors, your manuscript has not the proper template for JPM. 

Re: Thank you for your comment! We have modified the manuscript according to the  JPM guidelines.

 

RC 2. In addition your study is too similar with this one: He J, Qing L, Wu P et al. Large wounds reconstruction of the lower extremity with combined latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and flow-through anterolateral thigh perforator flap transfer. Microsurgery 2021; 41: 533-542.

Re: Thank you for your comment! These papers indeed share some similarities. However, the previous paper is a case series to introduce our experience with large wound reconstruction with the combined transfer of latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous and flow-through ALT flap.

On the other hand, the current study is a comparative study of free chain-linked bilateral anterolateral thigh perforator flaps and extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps. The aim of this study is to understand if either flap is better suited for large soft tissue defects. Moreover, the surgical procedure described in these two papers differ.

Reviewer 3 Report

no suggestions

Author Response

No special comments.

Back to TopTop