Next Article in Journal
External Validation of COVID-19 Risk Scores during Three Waves of Pandemic in a German Cohort—A Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Atraumatic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Case Report Treated with Excision of the Distal Clavicle Margin and Button Slide System with Allograft Tendon Reinforcement at Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Joint
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Addiction Risk and Psychological Profiling Analyses for “Preaddiction” Severity Index
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects in the Distal Lower Extremity: Free Chain-Linked Bilateral Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flaps versus Extended Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flaps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ilizarov Bone Transfer for Treatment of Large Tibial Bone Defects: Clinical Results and Management of Complications

1
Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha 410008, China
2
Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(11), 1774; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111774
Submission received: 3 September 2022 / Revised: 12 October 2022 / Accepted: 20 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Good Clinical Practice in Plastic Surgery)

Abstract

:
Backgrounds: The purpose of this study is to present our clinical experience using the Ilizarov bone transfer technique and free-flap technique in the reconstruction of large tibial bone and soft tissue defects, including an evaluation of both the management of postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. Methods: From January 2010 to May 2020, 72 patients with tibia bone and soft tissue defects were retrospectively evaluated. Either an anterolateral thigh perforator flaps (ALTP) or latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps (LD), solely or in combination, were used to cover soft tissue defects. Once the flap was stabilized, an Ilizarov external fixator was applied to the limb. Follow-up was postoperatively performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Results: Postoperatively, there were two cases of total and five of partial flap necrosis, and two cases of subcutaneous ulcers, which were caused by vascular crisis, infection, and hematoma, respectively. All the patients underwent Ilizarov external fixator surgery after flap recovery. A total of 16 complications occurred, including 3 cases of simple needle tract infection (antibiotic treatment) and 13 cases of complications requiring reoperation. A correlation factor analysis revealed that the main factors affecting the healing time were the defect length and operative complications. All patients with complications treated with the vascularized iliac flap eventually healed completely. Conclusions: The Ilizarov method used together with an ALTP, LD, or a combination thereof yields good clinical results for repairing large bone and soft tissue defects of the tibia, thus reducing the incidence of amputations. However, longer treatment times may be involved, and postoperative complications can occur. The vascularized iliac flap may be a suitable choice for the treatment of postoperative complications of this type of Ilizarov bone transport.

1. Introduction

Open and comminuted fractures of lower extremities caused by high-energy and severe trauma, usually accompanied by severe peripheral soft tissue injury or defects, as well as bone and soft tissue necrosis and infection, are thorny problems in surgery [1]. Without options for bone and soft tissue coverage and reconstruction, amputation may be unavoidable [2]. Therefore, finding efficient reconstruction methods to salvage the limb is imperative. Surgeons must choose a limb salvaging strategy that potentially improves the patients’ quality of life based on the fundamental principle of soft tissue coverage with osseous reconstruction.
With the development of perforator flap technique, the damage to the donor site can be significantly reduced, and the application scope is becoming increasingly wide. “Free flap” is the main method to repair large soft tissue defects, and latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous (LD) and anterolateral thigh perforator (ALTP) flaps are commonly used [3,4,5]. These flaps can not only repair wounds and prevent deep tissue necrosis but also reduce the incidence of local infection and enhance patient comfort. The blood supply of transplanted tissue provides a good microenvironment for fracture healing. Therefore, in the treatment of composite bone and soft tissue defects, we tend to use the free-flap technique to repair the wound after debridement. However, with the larger flap area required for severely injured wounds, the risk of necrosis and other complications cannot be ignored. To reduce the corresponding risk, it is also necessary to conduct a thorough debridement of the wound cover as early as possible.
At present, there are a variety of repair methods for bone defects, including allografts [6], cancellous bone autografts [7], pedicled vascularized iliac crest grafts [8], pedicled vascularized fibular transfers [9], and microvascular fibular transfers [10]. Ilizarov’s distraction osteogenesis method has proved particularly effective in large bone defect reconstruction [11], whereas other repair methods are limited by the length of the bone defect [9,10,12]. Related studies have combined free-flap transplantation and Ilizarov bone transport to achieve the reconstruction of tibia and surrounding soft tissue defects, resulting in this technique becoming popular in the field of limb repair and reconstruction [13,14,15]. However, difficulties and complications associated with the use of the Ilizarov bone transport technique have been reported [16,17,18]. These complications remain clinically intractable, prolonging treatment time and increasing patient suffering.
In this study, a retrospective study was conducted to collect the data of patients with severe large tibial bone defects combined with soft tissue defects who were treated in our department from January 2010 to May 2020. Specifically, the purpose of this report was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Ilizarov bone transport combined with free-flap transplantation, the management of postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Seventy-two patients with lower extremity tibia and soft tissue defects were treated using either an ALTP, LD, or a combination thereof to cover soft tissue defects. Ilizarov bone transport was used to reconstruct bone defects from January 2010 to May 2020. A total of 63 male patients and 9 female patients were included in this study. The age of patients ranged from 8 to 57 years (median, 29.5 years). The original mechanisms of injury were traffic accidents (n = 54), crush injury (n = 11), and agricultural accidents (n = 7). Patient details are shown in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. This study followed the ethical guidelines of the Hospital Ethical Committee of Xiangya Hospital, China.
Of the included patients, 28 were admitted to the emergency department after direct trauma and 44 had a history of surgical treatment, including an open reduction with internal and external fixation before admission. After debridement, the size of the soft tissue defects ranged from 50.0 to 360.0 cm2 (median, 198.8 cm2), and the size of the bone defect ranged from 5 to 18 cm (median, 10.6 cm).

2.2. Surgical Technique

After the initial debridement, all patients were treated by general external fixation. Flap coverage was performed when the wound was deemed clean. Massive tibial bone defects were usually accompanied by large soft tissue defects, and thus, an ALTP, LD, or a combination thereof were used to cover large defects [3].
After free-flap stabilization (median, 1.5 months), the temporary external fixator was replaced by an Ilizarov external fixator [19,20]. The distance between the fracture site and adjacent wires or half-pins was approximately 5 cm. The wires or half-pins near the knee and ankle were parallel to the joint line. Necrotic bone was excised until the boney ends presented punctuated cortical bleeding. Alternatively, percutaneous osteotomy was performed at the healthy metaphysis of the tibia, and bone transport was carried out.
The patients underwent supervised daily physiotherapy, including active and passive range-of-motion exercises for the knee and ankle. Standing and walking, with a gradual shift from partial to full weight-bearing, was encouraged. Distraction commenced on postoperative day 7 at a rate of 1 mm/d and continued in four equal increments until the desired length had been achieved. Consolidation was considered sufficient when the formation of a bridging callus was visible on three of four visible cortices in the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, and when tenderness at the fracture site and pain during full weight-bearing without connecting rods were no longer present. After confirming consolidation, the apparatus was removed under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic.
The postoperative complications of Ilizarov bone transport included fracture nonunion, intolerability, and soft tissue interposition (when reoperation was required to remove ischemic bone and/or embedded soft tissue before vascularized iliac bone flap transplantation) in addition to refracture (with a cancellous bone graft of iliac crest).
Demographic and intraoperative data, early complications, and long-term follow-up results were collected. Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Confirmation of bone healing (removal of external fixator) was monitored for up to 1 year. The cosmetic appearances of the recipient and donor sites were subjectively evaluated by the guardian and objectively by a blinded third-party observer according to a scale of 1 (excellent) to 4 (poor). The bone and functional results were assessed by ASAMI criteria [21] at the last clinical visit.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative basic conditions were performed in this study. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative data were expressed as the number of cases. Student’s t test (a comparison of two independent samples) or a one-way ANOVA-LSD test (a comparison of three independent samples) were used to compare the factors related to fracture healing time. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value of p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

3. Results

The follow-up time ranged from 25 to 49 months (median, 36 months). The mean soft tissue defect size was 198.8 ± 50.8 cm2. To cover these soft tissue defects, ALTP flaps were used in 24 patients, LD flaps in 32 patients, and combined flaps (bilateral ALTP or ALTP + LD) in 16 patients. The flap harvesting time was 74.0 ± 20.2 min, and the total operation time was 275.8 ± 55.1 min. There were two cases of total flap necrosis, five cases of partial flap necrosis, and two cases of subcutaneous ulcers, caused by vascular crisis, infection, and hematoma, respectively. Following vascular exploration, re-flap surgery, and dressing change, all flaps successfully healed. There was a delayed healing of the donor site in two patients in which healing occurred after dressing change.
All patients underwent Ilizarov external fixator surgery after the flap was stabilized (mean, 1.5 months). The operation time was 60.6 ± 8.4 min, the external fixator was carried for 21.3 ± 5.6 months, the external fixation index was 62.4 ± 11.2 d/cm, and the bone healing time was 23.3 ± 5.6 months. Based on the ASAMI scoring, excellent and good ratings of bone results were achieved in 90.3% (65/72) of cases, and a functional result in 70.8% (51/72). Satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of patients’ lower extremities was evaluated by their guardians and third-party blind observers, and the rates for excellent and good results were 70.8% and 68.1%, respectively.
During the follow-up period, 16 complications occurred, including 3 cases of simple needle tract infection (antibiotic treatment) and 13 cases of complications requiring reoperation. A total of 21 patients could not tolerate the external fixator because of the long treatment time and the severity of complications. The detailed management of complications requiring reoperation is shown in Table 4 and all patients eventually healed completely.
A univariate analysis showed that the time of bone healing was related to age, bone defect length, size of the soft tissue defect, and postoperative complications (p < 0.05, Table 3). However, the gender, weight, and smoking and drinking history of patients had no significant effect on healing time. After adjusting for confounding factors, it was found that the main factors affecting healing time were the defect length and whether complications occurred. The length of the bone defect was positively correlated with the area of the defect and complications (p < 0.05, Table 5). The healing time of the group with complications was longer than that of the group without complications (p < 0.05, Table 5).

4. Case Report

Case 1: A 38-year-old male presented with an open tibia and fibula fracture due to a traffic injury. After debridement, the soft tissue defects of the left leg were 168 cm2, and the tibia defect was 18 cm. In the first stage, an LD was used to repair soft tissue defects. After 1.5 months, the patient was readmitted for secondary Ilizarov bone transport. Distraction commenced on post-operative day 7 at a rate of 1 mm/d. After 24 months, the external fixator was dismantled, and the tibia bone was completely repaired. The ASAMI bone and function scores were good. The total time for fracture bridging and bone healing was 26 months (Figure 1).
Case 2: A 20-year-old female presented with an open tibia and fibula fracture due to a traffic injury. After debridement, the soft tissue defects of the right leg were 360 cm2, and the tibia defect was 14.5 cm. In the first stage, a modified LD flap was used to repair soft tissue defects. One month later, the patient was readmitted for secondary Ilizarov bone transport. Distraction commenced on post-operative day 7 at a rate of 1 mm/d. After 26 months, the external fixator was dismantled, and the tibia bone had completely healed. The ASAMI bone and function scores were good. The total healing time was 28 months (Figure 2).
Case 3: An 8-year-old male presented with an open tibia and fibula fracture due to a traffic injury. After debridement, the soft tissue defects of the right leg were 172 cm2, and the tibia defect was 7 cm. In the first stage, an ALTP flap and skin grafts were used to repair soft tissue defects. Two months later, the patient was readmitted for secondary Ilizarov bone transport. Distraction commenced on post-operative day 7 at a rate of 1 mm/d. After 16 months of scar hyperplasia contractures, nonunion of fractures, and intolerability, the external fixator was removed, and the repair was conducted with iliac bone and LD flaps. The total healing time was 22 months (Figure 3).

5. Discussion

Large-area soft tissue defects of lower extremities combined with tibial bone defects caused by trauma are a difficult surgical problem reported in numerous related studies [22]. For extremely severe bone and soft tissue defects, the patients who withstood amputation had similar or even better outcomes compared with patients who withstood reconstruction, because the former had similar sociodemographic characteristics [2] and returned to society earlier [23]. However, due to the demanding requests of most patients, reconstructing bone and soft tissue defects is challenging for surgeons. In principle, the reconstruction of this kind of injury involves using free-flap technique to first repair the soft tissue defect, and then Ilizarov bone transfer to treat the bone defect after the skin flap has completely healed and is stabilized. There are many types of free flaps available for repairing soft tissue defects, but the selection of flaps is generally based on the wound surface and the patient’s body condition [24,25,26]. Since all patients included in this study suffered from large traumatic tibial bone defects accompanied by large surface defects, LD and ALTP were the most suitable types of free flaps.
Free-flap transplantation is currently the method of choice for repairing large-area soft tissue defects. A massive flap is usually required to repair large recipient site defects, which often increases the risk of postoperative complications [27,28]. In order to avoid these complications, it is necessary to improve microsurgical techniques [29]. In this study, ALTP and LD were used to repair wounds; postoperative complications occurred in nine cases (total necrosis in two cases, partial necrosis in five cases, and subcutaneous ulcers in two cases). The following reasons for postoperative flap complications were considered: the perforator vessels could not provide sufficient supply to the whole flap covering the soft tissue defects, and a severe extravasation of blood after multiple debridement procedures of the infected wound caused subcutaneous hematoma compression of the perforator vessels. After the corresponding treatment, all patients had complete wound healing and obtained satisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Therefore, we can conclude that ALTP and LD have good efficacy in the treatment of large soft tissue defects of the lower extremities.
When the perforator flap had completely healed, the Ilizarov bone transfer technique was used to repair the bone defect. According to the ASAMI score, the bone healing was rated excellent and good in 90.3% of our patients, and the functional rating was excellent and good in 70.8%, which is consistent with the relevant results of others [30]. According to published studies of single-level Ilizarov bone transport, the average external fixation index is 2 months/cm of gained length [31,32]. In our study, the foreign fixation index was 62.4 ± 11.2 days/cm, which was comparable with the data of others. During the follow-up, 16 complications occurred, including 3 cases of simple needle tract infection (antibiotic treatment) and 13 cases of complications requiring reoperation. Considering that patients were supposed to wear the external fixator device for a considerable amount of time, complications such as soft tissue incarceration, infection, and pin loosening were unavoidable. Though it has been theorized that delayed union can be regarded as a planned staged procedure instead of a complication [33], it is our opinion that the unanticipated goals in delayed union should be classified as complications. The Ilizarov bone transfer technique involves a nonunion caused by the loss of osteogenic activity of bone tissue at the end of the bone defect after prolonged traction. Other studies have shown that some complications caused by Ilizarov bone transfer technique in the treatment of large bone defects are inevitable [18,34].
The correlation factor analysis showed that the main factors affecting healing time were the size of the tissue defect and whether complications occurred; moreover, the length of the fracture gap was positively correlated with both the area of the soft tissue defect and complications. The healing time in our study was longer than that in other relevant studies [34,35], which might be due to various factors. First, the patient’s adjustment time was relatively long due to pain in the bone slip process after surgery and the increased risk of complications due to improper surgical operation. Second, the soft tissue defect area and bone defect length of the patients in our study were larger than those of other related studies [34,35]. Since the rates of new bone formation and healing are related to the microenvironment, the healing time was still affected despite the use of flap technique for wound repair.
Based on our reported cases, the main advantages of Ilizarov bone transfer technique can be summarized as follows [34,35]: (1) The Ilizarov annular external fixator is mounted in a three-dimensional space through multiple Kirschner wires in different directions and planes, whereby the apparatus is stable. (2) The external fixator can rectify deformities such as varus and valgus and internal and external rotation in addition to correct angulation, reducing the need for secondary surgical adjustments. (3) It decreases the risk of additional vessel injuries and reduces the incidence of infection, and it can reset fracture fragments and repair almost any bone defect length. (4) It does not require bone grafting, and patients can exercise early during recovery, reducing the incidence of bedridden complications. However, Ilizarov bone transfer technique also possesses several disadvantages: (1) The technique has relatively few indications because it requires healthy metaphysis to perform the bone lengthening. (2) The circular external fixator is bulky, and the treatment process is relatively long, which often results in poor patient tolerance. (3) In the process of diagnosis and treatment, patients require numerous X-ray examinations, which increases radiation exposure. (4) Improper adjustments can cause needle tract infection and other postoperative complications. (5) In our study, the shape of the patient’s lower leg was different than that of the healthy side, and the calf had the same perimeter as the initial position of osteotomy; as a result, the patients’ satisfaction was not high. Especially in larger defects, leg lengthening occurs from the proximal tibia, resulting in the whole calf becoming as thick as the proximal tibia, often with degraded aesthetics. For patients with a primary extension, this problem would not occur because the contour of the lower leg would be maintained.
To decrease the treatment period, Yang et al. [36] and Borzunov et al. [37] modified Ilizarov bone transfer technique using double-level defect fragment bone transport and successfully decreased the bone transport time. With the development of microsurgical techniques, improving the clinical efficacy of free vascularized iliac bone flaps for the reconstruction of the mandible, tibia defects and femoral head necrosis have been demonstrated [38,39,40,41]. However, the most important limitation is the length of resection. The iliac bone flap is preferred over the fibula flap, which is commonly used to repair bone defects, because it contains both cortical and cancellous bone. Cortical bone can provide support, and cancellous bone provides a more conductive microenvironment for osteogenesis, which allows for better and faster bone healing compared with fibular flaps. In addition, the iliac bone flap has an abundant blood supply and a strong anti-infection ability. In order to solve the fracture nonunion caused by complications, repairs were conducted with free iliac bone flaps in 11 patients in this study, with healing occurring within an average of 5 months after the operation. In our opinion, the Ilizarov bone transfer technique is currently the best choice for repairing large bone defects. Nevertheless, the long carrying time and the relatively high complication rate of external fixations are clinical problems still to be resolved. Therefore, our research center has begun to gradually combine the two techniques in an attempt to solve the problem of large bone defects by reducing bone healing time and the incidence of complications. However, the specific advantages and disadvantages need to be further evaluated and defined by clinical studies on large numbers of patients.

6. Conclusions

The Ilizarov method combined with free flap technique yielded good clinical results in repairing large bone and soft tissue defects of the tibia, thus reducing the incidence of amputations. However, there are still the following shortcomings: (1) Compared with simple soft tissue defects, the defect area and wound severity in this study were more serious, resulting in a relatively increased risk of postoperative flap complications. (2) Since the length of bone healing time was closely related to the length of the bone defect and the occurrence of complications, the longer the treatment time, the higher the risk of postoperative complications, which cannot be tolerated by most patients. In order to solve the corresponding complications, we used the vascularized iliac bone flap in this study and achieved good results. Therefore, our center has begun to gradually explore the combination of the Ilizarov bone transport technique with vascularized iliac bone flap transplantation to reduce bone healing time and reduce the incidence of complications; however, its efficacy needs to be further observed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W. and J.T.; methodology, Y.Z.; software, Z.C.; validation, K.L. and L.Q.; formal analysis, Z.C.; investigation, Z.C and Y.Z.; resources, J.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and Z.C.; supervision, J.T.; project administration, J.T.; funding acquisition, J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [funder: J.T., No. 81871577] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [funder: P.W., No. 82072194].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (approval code 2021020137). Informed consent was obtained from patients and guardians in all cases.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets to support the findings of this study are included within the article, including figures and tables. Any other data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ALTP, anterolateral thigh perforator; LD, latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous; BMI, body mass index; ASAMI, Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov.

References

  1. Kadhim, M.; Holmes, L.; Gesheff, M.G.; Conway, J.D. Treatment Options for Nonunion with Segmental Bone Defects: Systematic Review and Quantitative Evidence Synthesis. J. Orthop. Trauma 2017, 31, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bosse, M.J.; MacKenzie, E.J.; Kellam, J.F.; Burgess, A.R.; Webb, L.X.; Swiontkowski, M.F.; Sanders, R.W.; Jones, A.L.; McAndrew, M.P.; Patterson, B.M.; et al. An Analysis of Outcomes of Reconstruction or Amputation after Leg-Threatening Injuries. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1924–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pang, X.; Cao, Z.; Wu, P.; Tang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Yu, F.; Zeng, L.; Xiao, Y.; Pan, D.; Liu, R. Outcomes of free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps versus free modified latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps for Gustilo type IIIB open tibial fractures with necrosis and in-fection. Am. J. Transl Res. 2020, 12, 5836–5843. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Hsieh, F.; Leow, O.Q.Y.; Cheong, C.-F.; Hung, S.-Y.; Tsao, C.-K. Musculoseptocutaneous Perforator of Anterolateral Thigh Flap: A Clinical Study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020, 147, 103e–110e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mericli, A.F.; Szpalski, C.; Schaverien, M.V.; Selber, J.C.; Adelman, D.M.; Garvey, P.B.; Villa, M.T.; Robb, G.; Baumann, D.P. The Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Is a Safe and Effective Method of Partial Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Breast-Conserving Therapy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2019, 143, 927e–935e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sanders, P.; Spierings, J.; Albergo, J.; Bus, M.; Fiocco, M.; Farfalli, G.; van de Sande, M.; Aponte-Tinao, L.; Dijkstra, P. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction for Lower-Extremity Bone Tumors. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2020, 102, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Myeroff, C.; Archdeacon, M. Autogenous Bone Graft: Donor Sites and Techniques. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2011, 93, 2227–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Shao, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, B.; Wu, T. Virtual Surgical Planning for Successful Second-Stage Mandibular Defect Reconstruction Using Vascularized Iliac Crest Bone Flap. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2020, 84, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khira, Y.M.; Badawy, H.A. Pedicled vascularized fibular graft with Ilizarov external fixator for reconstructing a large bone defect of the tibia after tumor resection. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2013, 14, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Eward, W.C.; Kontogeorgakos, V.; Levin, L.S.; Brigman, B.E. Free Vascularized Fibular Graft Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects after Tumor Resection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Quinnan, S.M. Segmental Bone Loss Reconstruction Using Ring Fixation. J. Orthop. Trauma 2017, 31 (Suppl. 5), S42–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Abdou, S.A.; Stranix, J.T.; Daar, D.A.; Mehta, D.D.; McLaurin, T.; Tejwani, N.; Saadeh, P.B.; Levine, J.P.; Leucht, P.; Thanik, V.D. Free Tissue Transfer with Distraction Osteogenesis and Masquelet Technique Is Effective for Limb Salvage in Patients with Gustilo Type IIIB Open Fractures. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020, 145, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhen, P.; Hu, Y.-Y.; Luo, Z.-J.; Liu, X.-Y.; Lu, H.; Li, X.-S. One-Stage Treatment and Reconstruction of Gustilo Type III Open Tibial Shaft Fractures with a Vascularized Fibular Osteoseptocutaneous Flap Graft. J. Orthop. Trauma 2010, 24, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rozbruch, S.R.; Weitzman, A.M.; Watson, J.T.; Freudigman, P.; Katz, H.V.; Ilizarov, S. Simultaneous Treatment of Tibial Bone and Soft-tissue Defects with the Ilizarov Method. J. Orthop. Trauma 2006, 20, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, R.; Zeng, C.; Yuan, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ren, G.-H. Free flap transplantation combined with Ilizarov bone transport for the treatment of severe composite tibial and soft tissue defects. J. Int. Med Res. 2021, 49, 03000605211017618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hollenbeck, S.T.; Woo, S.; Ong, S.; Fitch, R.D.; Erdmann, D.; Levin, L.S. The Combined Use of the Ilizarov Method and Microsurgical Techniques for Limb Salvage. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2009, 62, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aktuglu, K.; Erol, K.; Vahabi, A. Ilizarov bone transport and treatment of critical-sized tibial bone defects: A narrative review. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2019, 20, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Krappinger, D.; Irenberger, A.; Zegg, M.; Huber, B. Treatment of large posttraumatic tibial bone defects using the Ilizarov method: A subjective outcome assessment. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2013, 133, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ilizarov, G.A.; Ledyaev, V.I. The replacement of long tubular bone defects by lengthening distraction osteotomy of one of the fragments. 1969. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1992, 280, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. El-Alfy, B.S.; Maaty, M.; Niazy, T. Reconstruction of infected nonunion of the distal humerus by Ilizarov external fixator. Injury 2020, 52, 1418–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paley, D.; Catagni, M.A.; Argnani, F.; Villa, A.; Benedetti, G.B.; Cattaneo, R. Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989, 241, 146–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qing, L.; Wu, P.; Yu, F.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, J. Use of a sequential chimeric perforator flap for one-stage reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects of the extremities. Microsurgery 2020, 40, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. van Dongen, T.T.; Huizinga, E.P.; de Kruijff, L.G.; van der Krans, A.C.; Hoogendoorn, J.M.; Leenen, L.P.; Hoencamp, R. Amputation: Not a failure for severe lower extremity combat injury. Injury 2017, 48, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zheng, X.; Zheng, C.; Wang, B.; Qiu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, X. Reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defects in the extremities with chimeric anterolateral thigh perforator flap. Int. J. Surg. 2016, 26, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chai, Y.-M.; Wang, C.-Y.; Zeng, B.-F.; Chen, Z.-G.; Cai, P.-H.; Kang, Q.-L.; Ruan, H.-J. Peroneal artery perforator chimeric flap for reconstruction of composite defects in extremities. Microsurgery 2010, 30, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Massarelli, O.; Gobbi, R.; Biglio, A.; Soma, D.; Tullio, A. Chimeric Lateral Supramalleolar Artery Perforator Fibula Free Flap in the Reconstruction of Composite Head and Neck Defects. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014, 133, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hwang, J.H.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, D.Y.; Lee, S.Y. Latissimus Dorsi Muscle and Its Short Perforator-Based Skin Compound Free Flap. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2007, 58, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tee, R.; Jeng, S.-F.; Chen, C.-C.; Shih, H.-S. The medial sural artery perforator pedicled propeller flap for coverage of middle-third leg defects. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2019, 72, 1971–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nazerali, R.; Pu, L.L. Free Tissue Transfer to the Lower Extremity. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2013, 70, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Testa, G.; Vescio, A.; Aloj, D.C.; Costa, D.; Papotto, G.; Gurrieri, L.; Sessa, G.; Pavone, V. Treatment of Infected Tibial Non-Unions with Ilizarov Technique: A Case Series. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Di, J.; Peng, A. Double-level bone transport for large post-traumatic tibial bone defects: A single centre experience of sixteen cases. Int. Orthop. 2018, 42, 1157–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yin, P.; Zhang, L.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Q.; Tang, P. Infected nonunion of tibia and femur treated by bone transport. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2015, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Cierny, G., 3rd; Zorn, K.E. Segmental tibial defects. Comparing conventional and Ilizarov methodologies. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1994, 301, 118–123. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, R.; Zhu, G.; Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; Ren, G. Bone Transport for Treatment of Traumatic Composite Tibial Bone and Soft Tissue Defects: Any Specific Needs besides the Ilizarov Technique? BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 2716547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosteius, T.; Pätzholz, S.; Rausch, V.; Lotzien, S.; Behr, B.; Lehnhardt, M.; Schildhauer, T.A.; Seybold, D.; Geßmann, J. Ilizarov bone transport using an intramedullary cable transportation system in the treatment of tibial bone defects. Injury 2021, 52, 1606–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, Y.; Shen, S.; Xiao, Q.; Wang, G.; Yang, H.; Zhao, H.; Shu, B.; Zhuo, N. Efficacy comparison of double-level and single-level bone transport with Orthofix fixator for treatment of tibia fracture with massive bone defects. Int. Orthop. 2020, 44, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Borzunov, D.Y. Long bone reconstruction using multilevel lengthening of bone defect fragments. Int. Orthop. 2012, 36, 1695–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ju, J.; Li, L.; Zhou, R.; Hou, R. Combined application of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and iliac bone flap in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremity. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2018, 13, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kimata, Y.; Uchiyama, K.; Sakuraba, M.; Ebihara, S.; Hayashi, R.; Asakage, T.; Nakatsuka, T.; Harii, K. Deep circumflex iliac perforator flap with iliac crest for mandibular reconstruction. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2001, 54, 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taylor, G.I.; Watson, N. One-stage repair of compound leg defects with free, revascularized flaps of groin skin and iliac bone. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1978, 61, 494–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lei, P.; Du, W.; Liu, H.; Wu, P.; Zhou, Z.; Yu, F.; Qing, L.; Pan, D.; Liu, R.; Zeng, L.; et al. Free vascularized iliac bone flap based on deep circumflex iliac vessels graft for the treatment of osteonecrosis of femoral head. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A 38-year-old male patient with right tibial bone and soft tissue defects suffered from vascular crisis. (A,B) The preoperative radiographic view and the left leg after radical debridement. (C) The designed latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap of donor site. (D) The soft tissue coverage of recipient site. (E) Installed Ilizarov external fixator at one-month follow-up. (FJ) Postoperative radiographic view at the 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. (K,L) Postoperative radiographic view and recipient site at the 26-month follow-up.
Figure 1. A 38-year-old male patient with right tibial bone and soft tissue defects suffered from vascular crisis. (A,B) The preoperative radiographic view and the left leg after radical debridement. (C) The designed latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap of donor site. (D) The soft tissue coverage of recipient site. (E) Installed Ilizarov external fixator at one-month follow-up. (FJ) Postoperative radiographic view at the 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. (K,L) Postoperative radiographic view and recipient site at the 26-month follow-up.
Jpm 12 01774 g001
Figure 2. A 20-year-old female patient sustained a tibial bone and soft tissue defect on the right lower leg caused by a traffic accident. (A) The right leg after radical debridement. (B,C) The designed modified latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap of donor site. (D,E) The soft tissue of recipient and donor sites closed. (F) Installed Ilizarov external fixator after the soft tissue healed. (GJ) Postoperative radiographic view at the 7-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 9-month follow-ups. (K,L) Postoperative radiographic view and donor site at the 12-month follow-up. (M,N) Postoperative radiographic view before and after dismantling the external fixator at the 26-month follow-up. (O,P) Postoperative radiographic view and recipient site at the 30-month follow-up.
Figure 2. A 20-year-old female patient sustained a tibial bone and soft tissue defect on the right lower leg caused by a traffic accident. (A) The right leg after radical debridement. (B,C) The designed modified latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap of donor site. (D,E) The soft tissue of recipient and donor sites closed. (F) Installed Ilizarov external fixator after the soft tissue healed. (GJ) Postoperative radiographic view at the 7-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 9-month follow-ups. (K,L) Postoperative radiographic view and donor site at the 12-month follow-up. (M,N) Postoperative radiographic view before and after dismantling the external fixator at the 26-month follow-up. (O,P) Postoperative radiographic view and recipient site at the 30-month follow-up.
Jpm 12 01774 g002
Figure 3. An 8-year-old male patient sustained a tibial bone and soft tissue defect on the right lower leg caused by a traffic accident. (A,B,D) Postoperative radiographic view at 7 days, 2 months, and 3 months after Ilizarov bone transfer. (C) Appearance of the leg 3 months after bone transfer. (EK) After scar treatment, the iliac bone and LD flaps were removed to repair the defect wound. (LN) Postoperative radiographic view at 1, 2, and 4 months after iliac bone flap surgery. (O,P) One month after removal of external fixation.
Figure 3. An 8-year-old male patient sustained a tibial bone and soft tissue defect on the right lower leg caused by a traffic accident. (A,B,D) Postoperative radiographic view at 7 days, 2 months, and 3 months after Ilizarov bone transfer. (C) Appearance of the leg 3 months after bone transfer. (EK) After scar treatment, the iliac bone and LD flaps were removed to repair the defect wound. (LN) Postoperative radiographic view at 1, 2, and 4 months after iliac bone flap surgery. (O,P) One month after removal of external fixation.
Jpm 12 01774 g003
Table 1. Intraoperative data and short- and long-term follow-up results of soft tissue repair surgery.
Table 1. Intraoperative data and short- and long-term follow-up results of soft tissue repair surgery.
VariableIlizarov Group (N = 72)
Defect size (cm2)198.8 ± 50.8
Flap size (cm2)209.4 ± 52.9
Soft tissue repair
ALTP24
LD32
Other *16
Flap harvested time (min)74.0 ± 20.2
Operative time (min)275.8 ± 55.1
Flap complications
Total flap necrosis
Partial flap necrosis
Subcutaneous ulcer
2
5
2
Factors of flap necrosis
Vascular crisis5
Infection2
Hematoma2
Donor site morbidity
Delayed wound healing2
* Combination (bilateral ALTP or ALTP + LD) to repair the wound.
Table 2. Intraoperative data, short- and long-term follow-up results of bone defect repair.
Table 2. Intraoperative data, short- and long-term follow-up results of bone defect repair.
VariableIlizarov Group (N = 72)
Operative time (min)60.6 ± 8.4
Bone defect length (cm)10.6 ± 3.3
External fixator carrying time (months)21.3 ± 5.6
External fixation index (d/cm)62.4 ± 11.2
Bone healing time (months)23.3 ± 5.6
No longer tolerable21
Deep pin tract infection3
Reoperation13
ASAMI functional results
Excellent30
Good21
Fair 14
Poor7
ASAMI bone results
Excellent46
Good19
Fair 2
Poor5
Cosmetic evaluation
Subjectively a
Excellent20
Good31
Moderate16
Poor5
Objectively b
Excellent19
Good30
Moderate17
Poor6
a Guardians of the patients; b blinded third-party observer.
Table 3. Correlation analysis of factors affecting the time of bone healing.
Table 3. Correlation analysis of factors affecting the time of bone healing.
VariableNo. of Patients
(N = 72)
Bone Defect Length (cm)/p-ValueBone Healing Time (Months)/p-Value
Age (years) 0.0010.001
<18137.5 ± 1.817.7 ± 3.7
≥185911.3 ± 3.124.5 ± 5.1
Age (years) -0.025
<1813(5–10)17.7 ± 3.7
≥1826(5–10)20.5 ± 3.5
Gender 0.2250.092
Male6310.8 ± 3.023.7 ± 5.2
Female99.3 ± 4.720.3 ± 7.3
BMI 0.7220.518
Normal4410.5 ± 3.122.9 ± 5.2
Abnormal2810.8 ± 3.523.8 ± 6.1
Smoking history 0.4470.194
No4410.3 ± 3.622.6 ± 5.4
Yes2810.9 ± 2.724.3 ± 5.7
Drinking history 0.6060.273
No4910.4 ± 3.622.8 ± 5.4
Yes2310.9 ± 2.624.3 ± 6.5
Bone defect length (cm) 0.0010.001
4–8186.7 ± 1.116.7 ± 2.9
>8–12299.7 ± 1.122.8 ± 2.6
>122514.4 ± 1.528.5 ± 4.1
Soft tissue defect size (cm2) 0.0010.001
<180257.8 ± 2.019.6 ± 5.0
≥1804712.0 ± 2.925.2 ± 4.9
Postoperative complications 0.0300.001
No5910.2 ± 3.121.8 ± 4.4
Yes &1312.3 ± 3.729.6 ± 5.8
BMI, body mass index; & Deoperation is required for complications (scar hyperplasia contractures, nonunion of fracture, soft tissue incarceration, nonunion of fracture, refracture pin loosening, and intolerability).
Table 4. Details of patients and complications after Ilizarov bone graft requiring further surgical management.
Table 4. Details of patients and complications after Ilizarov bone graft requiring further surgical management.
NoAge/SexCause of InjuryBone Defect Location/Length (cm)Wound CoverageInitial Treatment Time (Months)Reasons for ReoperationTreatment MeasuresBone Healing Time
(Months)
Total Disease Duration
(Months)
18/MTraffic accidentLeft leg/7ALTP (184 cm2) + Skin grafts18Scar hyperplasia contractures, nonunion of fracture, and intolerabilityLD (175 cm2) + VIBF (5 cm)422
238/MTraffic accidentRight leg/10LD (172 cm2)23Soft tissue incarceration and intolerabilityALTP (161.5 cm2) + VIBF (5 cm)629
351/MCrush injuryRight leg/9ALTP (162.5 cm2)23Nonunion of fracture and intolerabilityVIBF (5 cm)427
456/MTraffic accidentLeft leg/5ALTP (56 cm2)18Nonunion of fractureSCIP (24 cm2) + VIBF (3 cm)723
534/FTraffic accidentRight leg/15LD (180 cm2) + ALTP (126 cm2)31Soft tissue incarceration, pin loosening, and intolerabilityReplace the nail, DIEP (60 cm2) + VIBF (4 cm)637
642/MTraffic accidentLeft leg/13.5LD (196 cm2)31Soft tissue incarceration and intolerabilityVIBF (5 cm)536
728/MTraffic accidentRight leg/14LD (160 cm2) + ALTP (133 cm2)30Soft tissue incarceration and intolerabilityVIBF (5 cm)535
857/MAgricultural accidentRight leg/13LD (161 cm2)25Nonunion of fracture and intolerabilityVIBF (5 cm)732
920/MTraffic accidentLeft leg/18LD (189 cm2) + ALTP (184 cm2)30Deep pin tract infection, pin loosening, nonunion of fracture, and intolerabilityReplace the nail, VIBF (5 cm)434
1027/MTraffic accidentLeft leg/15LD (225 cm2)20IntolerabilityVIBF (4 cm)525
1116/MTraffic accidentLeft leg/11ALTP (192 cm2)18IntolerabilityVIBF (5 cm)422
1247/MTraffic accidentLeft leg/16LD (152 cm2) + ALTP (126 cm2)28RefractureCancellous bone graft of the iliac crest937
1331/MCrush injuryRight leg/14LD (208 cm2) + Skin grafts-Deep pin tract infection and
pin loosening
Replace the nail-26
1418/MTraffic accidentRight leg/12LD (204 cm2)-Deep pin tract infection--23
1523/FTraffic accidentLeft leg/15.5LD (218.5 cm2) + ALTP (147 cm2)-Deep pin tract infection--27
1626/MTraffic accidentRight leg/12.5ALTP (212.5 cm2)-Deep pin tract infection--25
ALTP: anterolateral thigh perforator flap; TDAP: thoracodorsal artery perforator flap; LD: latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap; PAP: peroneal artery perforator flap; DIEP: deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
Table 5. The influence of related variables in the complication and non-complication groups.
Table 5. The influence of related variables in the complication and non-complication groups.
VariableSoft Tissue Defect Size (cm2)Complication Group &
(N = 13)
Non-Complication Group (N = 59)p-Value
Bone defect length (cm)
4–8
>8–12
>12
0.001
(150.8 ± 29.9)
(193.1 ± 24.2)
(239.8 ± 52.8)
0.001
2/(22.5 ± 0.7)
3/(26.0 ± 3.6)
8/(32.8 ± 4.8)
13/(29.6 ± 5.8)
0.001
16/(16.0 ± 2.1)
26/(22.4 ± 2.3)
17/(26.5 ± 1.3)
59/(21.8 ± 4.4)

0.001
0.022
0.007
0.001
& Reoperation is required for complications.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lipa, K.; Qing, L.; Wu, P.; Tang, J. Ilizarov Bone Transfer for Treatment of Large Tibial Bone Defects: Clinical Results and Management of Complications. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111774

AMA Style

Cao Z, Zhang Y, Lipa K, Qing L, Wu P, Tang J. Ilizarov Bone Transfer for Treatment of Large Tibial Bone Defects: Clinical Results and Management of Complications. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(11):1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Zheming, Yiqian Zhang, Katelyn Lipa, Liming Qing, Panfeng Wu, and Juyu Tang. 2022. "Ilizarov Bone Transfer for Treatment of Large Tibial Bone Defects: Clinical Results and Management of Complications" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 11: 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111774

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop