Next Article in Journal
Prognostic Values of Inflammatory Indexes and Clinical Factors in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Pathway Phenotypes Underpinning Depression, Anxiety, and Chronic Fatigue Symptoms Due to Acute Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Precision Nomothetic Psychiatry Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Radiogenomic Predictors of Recurrence in Glioblastoma—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Areas of Interest and Social Consideration of Antidepressants on English Tweets: A Natural Language Processing Classification Study
 
 
Opinion
Peer-Review Record

Precision Nomothetic Medicine in Depression Research: A New Depression Model, and New Endophenotype Classes and Pathway Phenotypes, and A Digital Self

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(3), 403; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030403
by Michael Maes 1,2,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(3), 403; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030403
Submission received: 23 January 2022 / Revised: 1 March 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 5 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The Conclusion must be 2 paragraphs. State the benefits of the article, the advantages, disadvantages as well. State the limitations if any.

Author Response

The Conclusion must be 2 paragraphs. State the benefits of the article, the advantages, disadvantages as well. State the limitations if any.

@ANSWER: the conclusion is now 2 paragraphs and describes the advantages (lines 6-10) as well as limitations (see last two lines of the Conclusions).

 

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an opinion paper about the interesting topic of precision psychiatry. It is generally well structured, and the data are described in a pretty analytical and comprehensible manner.  Despite that, there are several minor language and style issues that should be improved before publication.

For example, in page 9, “gadolunium” and “tumours” should be replaced by “gadolinium” and “tumors” respectively.

In page 12, “selfs” should be replaced by “selves”.

In page 14, “considered an intruders” should be replaced by “considered as intruders”.

In page 15, “eables” should be replaced by “enables”.

In page 24, “machnine” and “ans” should be replaced by “machine” and “and” respectively.

In page 26, “precison” and “colums” should be replaced by “precision” and “columns” respectively.

In page 36, “reoccurence” should be replaced by “reoccurrence”.

The conclusions section might be rephrased in order to be a bit more detailed.

Author Response

@ANSWER: All type’Os have been corrected (the above and other as well).

The conclusion section now comprises two paragraphs and contains more details including limitations (see referee 1).

 

Back to TopTop