Next Article in Journal
The Role of Mitochondrial Mutations in Chronification of Inflammation: Hypothesis and Overview of Own Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Chronic Thoracic Aortic Dissection: How to Treat, When to Intervene
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation of Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) Alters Ovarian Functions of Xylene-Exposed Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complex Aortic Interventions Can Be Safely Introduced to the Clinical Practice by Physicians Skilled in Basic Endovascular Techniques
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/life12081154
Review Report
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Midterm Results of Iliac Branch Devices in a Newly Established Aortic Center

Life 2022, 12(8), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081154
by Sarolta Borzsák 1,2, András Süvegh 1, András Szentiványi 1, Daniele Mariastefano Fontanini 1,2, Milán Vecsey-Nagy 1, Péter Banga 2,3, Péter Sótonyi 2,3, Zoltán Szeberin 2,3 and Csaba Csobay-Novák 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Tomasz Tokarek
Reviewer 2:
Carlotta Brega
Reviewer 3:
Qin Fu
Life 2022, 12(8), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081154
Submission received: 29 June 2022 / Revised: 22 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanism, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Aortic Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Interesting study, despite lo sample size it might be suitable for the journal. 

1. How many surgeons performed procedures?

2. Antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment after the procedure? Some patients might have indications due to atrial fibrillation or PCI

3.  Significantly less optimistic outcome is presented in abdominal aortic aneurysm, it might be important do discuss this topic and compare outcomes https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33868423/

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

 

Original paper, congratulations! I would like you to add some paragraphs about the Endoleaks, as you found 17, almost 50% of your patients population. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Authors tested the midterm results of iliac branch devices in an aortic center and proved their results are with high success. Some of the content needs to be modified to make the paper with higher quality.

1.       Line 22: the writing contains several errors in the sentences “The average follow-up time was 20.1 ± 26.2 months. during which 2 (5.9%) deaths occurred Our initial experience…”. “during which…” is a new sentence, the first character should be capital. “Our initial experience…”, no full stop is before this sentence.  Please double check the writing in this line for the abstract.

2.       Line 109: please use the standard writing in manuscript: SE<0.10, p<0.05.

3.       Line 115: please modify the date format like 14th, December 2020 and 23rd, July 2021.

4.       Line 152: when citing figures, please use standard writing way: (Figure 1 or Fig. 1), no dot after the number. The same for other figures’ citation in the text.

5.       Figure 1: if the bottom part is a table, please use the three-line format for table, demonstrate the table as an independent one.

6.       When cite references in the main text, please note that no dot should be in front of the reference number. Like line 211, 215.  Keep the format consistent in the manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

For me it’s ok

Back to TopTop