The search for life on Mars is predicated on the assumption that Martian life is likely to follow the model of Terran life that includes carbon-based organics, liquid water as a solvent, and is constrained by similar forms of evolution. However, until the scientific community has a confirmed extant Mars microbe or community to study, we are forced to use Terran microbial life as proxies for how life might persist on Mars. In general, it is also assumed that the best proxies for exploring how microbial life might persist and grow on Mars is through the study of microbial communities in extreme environments like the Antarctic dry valleys, the Atacama Desert, alpine sites, oligotrophic niches, and saline and acidic geochemistries like in Rio Tinto, Spain [1
]. In contrast, others have proposed that microorganisms recovered from Mars spacecraft should be used as model organisms [8
] because they might plausibly be dispersed onto the Martian terrain during lander or rover missions, and thus, might act as inoculum for contaminating sites of scientific interest.
Recently, a series of studies were published relevant to Mars habitability that demonstrate metabolic activity and growth for a diversity of bacteria and algae under conditions that are ≤100 hPa (see review by Schwendner and Schuerger) [12
], and as low as 7 hPa (i.e., 7 mbar) [10
]. Many of the species tested under low pressures ≤100 hPa were bacteria isolated from extremophilic ecosystems in the arctic and regional deserts [15
]. Of all of the hypopiezotolerant bacteria (def., as those microbes capable of metabolism and growth at low pressures <10 hPa [12
]) discussed in the literature above, the bacteria in the genera Bacillus
, and Serratia
have received the most attention.
was selected for the current study due to a proven record as a hypopiezotolerant bacterium capable of growth at 7 hPa [10
], metabolic profiling at 7 hPa with 95 sole-source organics [19
], transcriptomic responses at 7 hPa [13
], and tolerance to desiccation and moderate salt levels [20
]. Furthermore, Serratia
spp. have been recovered from spacecraft hardware and clean rooms [21
] and may be present on future robotic or human spacecraft to Mars.
Although the literature cited above suggests a diversity of Earth microorganisms can grow under simulated Mars conditions of 7 hPa, 0 °C, and CO2
-enriched anoxic atmospheres (henceforth called low-PTA
conditions), almost all of the literature to date used liquid- or agar-based media for metabolism and growth assays under low-PTA
conditions. In the few attempts to grow bacteria in Mars analog soils under realistic surface pressures at 7 hPa, the biggest problem encountered was the desiccation of the soils and subsequent loss of microbial survival [1
]. Thus, some attempts have been made to study microbial survival and growth in Mars analog soils at low pressures (≤50 hPa) in which liquid media are added [25
]. However, only a few studies have confirmed bacterial growth at the pressures (7–10 hPa) normally found on the surface of Mars [10
The primary goal of the current study was to determine if S. liquefaciens is capable of growth (i.e., cell proliferation) in Mars analog soils under low-PTA conditions. The research outlined below is based on the following three assumptions: (1) Microorganisms that might be displaced from spacecraft surfaces on Mars will remain viable until they are transported to potential habitable niches, (2) spores or cells are then protected from solar UV irradiation by being quickly emplaced within the regolith, and (3) the potential habitable niches are hydrated and possess nutrients that will support microbial activity. Thus, the primary hypothesis was that the hypopiezotolerant bacterium—S. liquefaciens—would grow under low-PTA conditions when mixed into hydrated Mars analog soils supplemented with essential nutrients.
2.1. Microbiological Procedures
Cells of the bacterium, Serratia liquefaciens ATCC 27592, were maintained on trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates at 30 °C for 18–24 h prior to preparing cell suspensions for the experiments described below. Cell suspensions were mixed in sterile deionized water (SDIW; 18 MΩ) and calibrated to equal ~2 × 106 viable cells/mL with a Genesys 30 Visible Spectrometer (Thermo-Scientific Corp., Madison, WI, USA) set at 600 nm yielding optical densities (OD) of ~0.007 (range 0.005 to 0.010).
Microbial populations were determined using a previously described most probable number (MPN) assay [9
] to estimate cell densities on a per-milliliter or a per-sample basis. For cell enumerations, 1 mL of the cell suspensions (in SDIW) were serially diluted and 20 µL per dilution pipetted into separate wells in a 96-well microtiter plate filled with 180 µL of trypticase soy broth (TSB) per well. Each dilution was dispensed into 16 wells (two columns) of the 96-well plates. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h and visually read for the number of positive wells per dilution.
For Mars analog soils, 5 g of analog soils (with cells) were placed in separate 50-cc polystyrene conical tubes containing 15 mL of SDIW. The soil/SDIW mixtures were agitated for 2 min on a vortex mixer set at maximum, soil particles were allowed to settle for 10 s, then cell suspensions were serially diluted and processed by the MPN procedure.
2.2. Mars Analog Soils
Five Mars analog soils were used in the experiments to cover a wide range of geochemical compositions, hydrogen ion concentrations (pH), and electrical conductivities (EC). The Mars analog soils were described previously [1
] and were labeled as Aeolian
(airborne dust component), Basalt
(base soil; from Duluth, MN, USA), Mars JSC-1
soil (an Hawaiian palagonite), Phoenix
(based on the regolith at the Phoenix lander site), and Salts
(a high-salts analog soil based on the Paso Robles soil, Husband Hill, Gusev Crater, Mars). All analog soils were pre-sterilized at 130 °C for 72 h prior to use.
The pH and EC of all soils (Figure 1
) were determined by mixing 50 g of each soil into separate 100-mL aliquots of SDIW in 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, and agitating the soil/water mixtures vigorously at 250 rpm for 2 h on a rotary shaker. The aqueous phases of all soil/water mixtures were filtered first through no. 4 Whatman filter paper on Buchner funnels, and then post-filtered through separate 0.45-µm sterile filters (polyethersulfone membrane, Whatman Puradisc 25 AS, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) to achieve particle-free and sterile soil solutions. All soil solutions were then measured for pH and EC using vendor directions (Oakton PD300 Series, Oakton Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL, USA; and Orion Star A325, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Beverly, MA, USA, respectively).
2.3. Sonication to Enhance Recovery of Cells from Mars Analog Soils
Initially it was hypothesized that sonication might enhance the recovery of S. liquefaciens cells from doped soils by helping to dislodge cells weakly attached to soil particles without killing the cells. To test this hypothesis, aliquots of JSC-1 soil were doped with cells at a rate of ~2 × 106 cells/50-cc conical tube containing 5 g of soil; inocula were prepared in SDIW. Into each 5-g aliquot of soil, 4 mL of SDIW were added, and each tube was inoculated with 1 mL of viable cells. The conical tubes were separated into two cohorts of samples to be sonicated between 0 and 20 min at 37 or 80 kHz using an Elmasonic P sonicator (Elma GmBH & Co., KG, Singen, Germany). Replicate tubes per sonication frequency were placed into the water bath of the sonicator and the kHz set. Samples were removed from the sonication bath at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min (total n = 24 per frequency). Crushed ice was periodically added to the sonication bath to keep the temperature of the fluid ≤30 °C. Each frequency of sonication was repeated 3 times, and the soils processed by the MPN protocol. The 5-g soil aliquots of JSC-1 soils were diluted with 15 mL of SDIW, agitated by vigorous vortexing for 2 min, soil particles allowed to settle for 10 s, cell suspensions serially diluted, and then processed as described above.
2.4. Extraction of Bacterial Cells from Doped Soils
As described in more detail in the results section, the sonication of the soils did not increase the recovery of S. liquefaciens
cells from the doped JSC-1
analog soil, and thus, sonication was not used in downstream soil experiments. In fact, it appeared that sonication decreased recovery, especially after 20 min, by inactivating cells over time (Figure 2
). However, we still required an efficient soil recovery process of viable cells of S. liquefaciens
from the Mars analog soils if we were to develop a useful soil-growth protocol.
Stock suspensions of cells were created in SDIW as described above and added to 5-g aliquots of all five Mars analog soils in separate 50-cc conical tubes to yield ~2 × 106 cells/tube. The doped analog soils were mixed with pre-sterilized stainless-steel spatulas (i.e., at 130 °C for 72 h), and immediately assayed with the MPN protocol. The extraction fluids for separate cohorts of conical tubes were either SDIW or 10 mM phosphate buffer (henceforth, PO4 buffer; pH 7.0; composed of equimolar concentrations of NaH2PO4 · 2H2O and Na2HPO4 · H2O). The two extraction fluids were tested to determine if the PO4 buffer would moderate the extreme pH levels of some analog soils and increase the recovery of viable cells. The necessary dilutions and arithmetic adjustments were conducted to estimate the numbers of viable cells per tube. The goal was to achieve between 75% and 90% recovery of S. liquefaciens cells per tube.
2.5. Growth of S. liquefaciens in a Minimal Liquid Growth Medium
The next step in developing a Mars analog soil bacterial-growth protocol was to determine the best minimal liquid growth medium required for moderate growth of S. liquefaciens
at 30 °C. Such a minimal medium could then be used to dope analog soils assuring that growth of S. liquefaciens
in the soils would not be limited by nutrients. Previously, Schwendner and Schuerger [19
] identified a number of sole-source organic molecules that could support the growth of S. liquefaciens
under simulated Martian conditions of 7 hPa, 0 °C, and a CO2
-enriched anoxic atmosphere. Of the organics identified, sucrose was reported to be one of the best sole-source carbon molecules that supported moderate growth under simulated Mars low-PTA
The minimal basal medium (MBM) was composed of 470 mL of a 1× Spizizen salts solution [32
], 25 mL of a micronutrient solution (see below), 5 mL of an iron-sulfate solution (1.92 g/L of Fe2
) plus 3.58 g/L of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; DTPA), and 2.5 g of NaCl. To this basal medium, 0.342 g of sucrose was added to yield a concentration of 10 mM sucrose. The solution was filter-sterilized through 0.2 µm filters (polyethersulfone membrane, Fisher Scientific) to prevent the precipitation of the salts encountered when the MBM was autoclaved. The micronutrient stock solution was composed of the following: MnSO4
O (0.246 g/L), ZnSO4
O (0.264 g/L), H3
(0.576 g/L), CuSO4
· 5 H2
O (0.152 g/L), and molybdenum (0.0074 μM (NH4
The MBM was dispensed into 50-cc conical tubes at a rate of 5 mL per tube; no analog soils were included at this stage. Inocula of S. liquefaciens cells were created in SDIW, as described above, and added to the 5 mL of MBM to yield ~2 × 105 cells/mL of MBM. Expecting significant growth of S. liquefaciens in the MBM over time, a lower than normal starting concentration of cells was used. Cultures were incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 48 h. Each conical tube was treated as a replicate, and then random tubes were assayed at 0, 24, or 48 h using the MPN protocol (n = 6 per treatment).
2.6. Growth of S. liquefaciens in Mars Analog Soils
The Aeolian, JSC-1, Phoenix, and Salts analog soils (but not the Basalt soil) were used to determine if S. liquefaciens cells might undergo metabolism and cellular replication in soils at 30 °C under an Earth-normal pressure of 1013 hPa. Five-grams of each soil were added to separate 50-cc conical tubes, mixed with 5 mL of MBM, doped with viable cells of S. liquefaciens, and incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 72 h. The starting population of S. liquefaciens was ~2 × 105 cells per tube. Three replicates of each soil were prepared for each of three runs, and sampled at 0, 24, 48, or 72 h (n = 9 per time-step). After incubation, 15 mL of SDIW was added to each 50-cc conical tube to increase the hydration of the soils and to suspend cells of S. liquefaciens in the liquid phase of the soil solutions. The total volume within the tubes equaled 20 cc that contained 5 g of each soil plus 5 mL of MBM and 15 mL of SDIW as the extraction fluid. The soil/water mixtures were vigorously mixed at high speed with a vortex system, allowed to settle for 10 s, serially diluted, and processed by MPN assays, as described above. After the MPN assays, the numbers of cells counted per tube were adjusted to account for all dilution and arithmetic effects in the assays.
2.7. Growth of S. liquefaciens under Simulated Mars Low-PTA Conditions
Initial experiments to determine if S. liquefaciens could grow in Mars analog soils doped with 10 mM sucrose, Spizizen salts, and micronutrients (i.e., the MBM), and incubated for 28 d under low-PTA conditions yielded negative results with no obvious growth observed in any of the analog soils (data not shown). It was hypothesized that either the soils became desiccated and growth rates were halted due to low water activities (aw) in the soils, the inoculum at ~2 × 105 cells per tube was too low, or that there were inadequate organics for metabolism and growth in the soils under low-PTA conditions.
Thus, the protocols for the Mars simulations in analog soils under low-PTA conditions were adjusted by (1) increasing the concentration of sucrose in the MBM to 20 mM, (2) increasing the amount of cells at T = 0 to ~2 × 106 cells per tube, and (3) adding an extra 5 mL of the MBM to each aliquot of 5 g of analog soils in the 50-cc conical tubes. Thus, the total volume of the soil/MBM at T = 0 was increased to 10 cc, which created a saturated soil matrix with approx. 3–4 mm of standing MBM observed above the soil surface. During the 28-d low-PTA experiments, the standing layers of MBM would decrease due to evaporating out of the 50-cc conical tubes at low pressures. As required, SDIW was added to individual tubes to bring the MBM layer back to a depth of 3–4 mm during the experiments.
Mars simulations were conducted on three replicates in each of the two experimental runs (n = 6 per treatment) for the Aeolian
, and Salts
analog soils. The Basalt
soil was dropped for this assay due its low geochemical complexity compared to that of the other analog soils [1
]. Soils were doped with viable cells of S. liquefaciens
(as described above), placed in wire racks, inserted into 4-L polycarbonate vacuum desiccators, and connected to separate low-pressure controllers and vacuum pumps [10
]. Prior to closing each vacuum desiccator, four anaerobic pouches and one anaerobic indicator tablet (AnaeroPack System, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Co., Remel/Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA, USA) were placed around the periphery of the 50-cc conical tubes. The vacuum controllers were sealed and flushed for 2 min with ultra-high purity (UHP) carbon dioxide (CO2
) gas. The low-pressure chambers were then transferred to microbial incubators set at 0 °C, and slowly equilibrated to 7 hPa by lowering the total pressure in increments down to 100, 50, 25, and 7 hPa in 15-min intervals [17
]. The tubes were then incubated under low-PTA
conditions for 28 d.
Every 7 days, the low-pressure desiccators were opened, three random 50-cc conical tubes per analog soil withdrawn, fresh anaerobic pouches inserted back into the desiccators, and the systems sealed and equilibrated to 7 hPa. At each time-step, the analog soils with S. liquefaciens cells were assayed as described above with the MPN protocol.
2.8. Statistical Methods
All data were analyzed with the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) version 9.4 (SAS institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Log(10)-transformations were used to induce homogeneity of treatment variances in all datasets. However, because ANOVA cannot process zeroes when log-transformations are used, an arbitrary low value of 0.0001 was assigned to each cell in the datasets that had no detectable cells in the assays after 28 d (see Supplemental Data
). Most transformed data were analyzed with ANOVA followed by protected least-squares mean separation tests (p
≤ 0.05). However, PROC REG was used to test for linear models with the sonication data given in Figure 2
. All data were plotted as log-transformed values, and, where appropriate, the LSmeans results were given as different small letters in the figures.
The Data Management Plan consists of posting all raw data for the experiments described here as Supplementary Data
to this article in the journal Life
, and depositing the raw data in the University of Florida Institutional Repository (UFIR) at the website https://ufdc.ufl.edu/ufirg/
The majority of Mars simulations with Terran microorganisms have studied the survival of desiccated cells or spores of bacteria, fungi, and algae at pressures down to 7 hPa (see reviews by Olsson–Francis and Cockell [35
]; Schwendner and Schuerger [12
]). Attempts to investigate metabolic activity, growth, cellular replication, and evolution at reduced pressures are more limited [10
]. One key difficulty with conducting low-pressure simulations close to the surface pressures on Mars (range 2 to 12 hPa) is keeping the growth medium hydrated. The triple point of water on the Martian surface is 0.01 °C at 6.1 hPa, with a very narrow window of pressure (3 and 12 hPa) and temperature (0 and ~10 °C) to maintain pure water in a liquid state [37
]. Liquid brines can suppress the freezing points of water, but then microbial activity and growth can be impaired by the presence of specific salt ions and the osmolarity of the brines [38
]. Thus, Mars simulations with diverse analog soils must consider constraints in thermodynamics, nutrition, biotoxicity, and the stability of liquid water (or brines) in order to accommodate the requirements of microbial metabolism and growth.
The aim of the current research was to develop a Mars analog soil and microbial growth protocol in which a known hypopiezotolerant bacterium (i.e., S. liquefaciens
) was given a minimal basal medium (MBM) that supported growth in a series of analog soils with diverse geochemistries, and incubated under simulated Mars low-PTA
conditions. Our initial hypothesis was that S. liquefaciens
would grow in at least some of the Mars analog soils over the course of 28 d under low-PTA
conditions because it had previously been shown that S. liquefaciens
could grow on TSA after 14 d under low-PTA
]. Furthermore, we observed obvious growth of S. liquefaciens
in MBM at 30 °C (Figure 4
), and in three of the analog soils at 30 °C (Figure 5
). Thus, the experiments were designed such that double the incubation-times were allowed for observing positive growth compared to earlier experiments.
Based on a high extraction efficiency for recovering viable cells from analog soils (75%; Figure 3
), we expected to observe obvious growth of S. liquefaciens
between 14 and 28 d in the most benign soil, the JSC-1
analog, and to lesser degrees in the other analogs. Surprisingly, all four analog soils exhibited varying levels of biocidal activity resulting in complete inactivation of cells by 7 d (Salts
), or slow decreases in the recovered cell densities over 28 d (Aeolian
) (Figure 6
). Although no data were collected here that might reveal if the lower cell numbers at 28 d were due to dormant cells that then failed to germinate during the MPN assays, we believe that the lower cell densities at 28 d were due to death and not dormancy because in other studies [10
], diverse bacteria were reported to remain inactive during low-PTA
incubations but would reactivate quickly when cultures were returned to normal Earth conditions of 1013 hPa and 30 °C.
Results did not support the conclusion that growth of the hypopiezotolerant bacterium—Serratia liquefaciens
ATCC 27592—occurred in any of the four Mars analog soils incubated under low-PTA
conditions. The conclusion is based on the criterion that soil-dilution assays require, at minimum, a 1-log increase in cell densities over starting populations to indicate active growth (i.e., increased cell numbers over time). This criterion is based on the reported experimental error of approx. ½-log precision in the MPN assays [9
], and an extraction efficiency of 75% observed here (Figure 3
). It is plausible that some cells in all analog soils might have absorbed water/nutrients and divided, but the combined soil-dilution and MPN assays were not precise enough to observe those processes unless ≥1 log increase in cell numbers were observed over time. For example, growth of S. liquefaciens
was obvious in the Aeolian
, and Phoenix
analog soils when incubated for 72 h at 30 °C because between 2-log (Phoenix
) and 4-log (Aeolian
) increases in cell densities were observed at 72 h compared to starting populations of cells. Thus, Mars analog soil growth experiments are tightly constrained by the precision of the assays used. In contrast, if the microorganism being tested produces metabolic or growth by-products that can be measured independently of cell proliferation (e.g., through real-time PCR of 16S rRNA genes, transcriptomics, metabolomics, or gas evolution), it may be plausible to measure metabolic activity and growth without enforcing the ≥1-log increase in cell density rule.
Why would cells of S. liquefaciens
not grow under low-PTA
conditions in analog soils when growth was previously shown for both low-PTA
] and in the analogs tested here (Figure 5
)? Several papers on the habitability of the Martian surface [6
] discuss between 17 and 22 biocidal or inhibitory factors on Mars that are likely to impact the survival and growth of spacecraft microorganisms. As more and more complex microbial growth experiments are developed, additional biocidal or inhibitory factors are added to the experimental designs. For example, in earlier studies with S. liquefaciens
], and diverse bacteria from arctic soils and permafrost [17
], the growth conditions used richer media than used here, and the bacteria were incubated on the upper surfaces of TSA plates free of soil particles. In addition, the analog soils themselves can act as physically constraining materials that can decrease gas and fluid diffusion rates.
The experiments described here tested Mars analog soils with diverse dissolved salts, pH values, levels of osmolarity not previously tested, and enhanced stress at 0 versus 30 °C. The pH range for S. liquefaciens
is between 5.55 and 10 [42
], and thus, it is unlikely that a neutral pH level alone in the Aeolian
, or Phoenix
soils (Figure 1
A) was the primary inhibitory factor in suppressing growth in the soils. It also does not seem plausible that the moderate to low EC values in most of the soils (Figure 1
B) would be the primary inhibitory factor for the Aeolian
, or Phoenix
soils, because S. liquefaciens
has been shown to tolerate increased salinities between 5% and 10% of diverse salts present on Mars when incubated under lab-normal conditions of pressure (1013 hPa) [20
]. However, it is likely that synergistic interactions among the six factors listed above (i.e., low pressure, low temperature, anoxic atmospheres (i.e., the low-PTA
conditions), low-pH in the Salts
soil, dissolved salts in all analogs, and oligotrophic conditions) increased the biocidal or inhibitory conditions within the analog soils. Further experiments to factor out the growth-limiting factors in analog soils under low-PTA
conditions are required.
Of the 14 papers reviewed by Schwendner and Schuerger [12
] for growth in low-pressure environments (≤100 hPa), all of the studies met the criterion of ≥1-log increase in cell densities observed over time. In contrast, the study by Pavlov et al. [44
] testing the growth of a Vibrio
sp. under low-PTA
conditions failed to satisfy the ≥1-log increase in cell numbers over time (i.e., ending populations of cells were 2 logs lower than starting populations of cells), and thus, the conclusion that growth occurred between 0.01 and 1 hPa is equivocal. It is more likely that Pavlov et al. [44
] demonstrated only reduced microbial survival and not growth in the test materials exposed to low pressures (0.01 to 1 hPa) and diel temperature fluctuations from −73 °C (nighttime lows) to 27 °C (daytime highs). Again, it is possible that some cells did in fact absorb nutrients and water that led to cell division, but soil assays alone are not precise enough to capture those processes except when the ending populations are statistically higher than the starting populations, and generally by at least ≥1-log.
Evaluating the results here, and those reviewed elsewhere [12
] on microbial growth in low-pressure environments relevant to Mars, the following recommendations are offered as an approach to developing standardized protocols. First, the low-PTA
conditions used here of 7 hPa, 0 °C, and CO2
-enriched anoxic atmospheres represent a reasonable global average for the surface of Mars, and should be considered essential test factors in future Mars-relevant growth experiments. If the pressures are much higher than the range found at the surface, the experiments begin to simulate not a surface environment but deeper subsurface conditions. Higher pressures are acceptable for Mars-relevant growth experiments, but the context of where such pressures might exist should be clearly stated.
Second, confirmed hypopiezotolerant microorganisms (e.g., Carnobacterium
spp., Exiguobacterium sibiricum
, S. liquefaciens
, and Trichococcus pasteurii
]) should be used to ensure that at least one positive control for growth be included in all assays of new species within the pressure range (2 to 12 hPa) found on the Martian surface. For example, Smith et al. [45
] studied the survival characteristics of Psychrobacter cryohalolentis
K5—a halophilic and psychrophilic bacterium—to simulated Martian conditions at 7 hPa and exposed to Mars-equatorial UV irradiation. Results clearly indicated survival—but not growth—if the cells were shielded from the simulated solar UV irradiation on Mars. However, in subsequent experiments, Schuerger et al. [10
] demonstrated that P. cryohalolentis
could not grow under low pO2
nor low-pressure (7 hPa) conditions. Thus, P. cryohalolentis
would not be a good candidate microorganism for growth experiments under simulated Martian conditions near 7 hPa.
Third, the nutrient regime used for simulated Martian growth experiments must be constrained due to the general oligotrophic conditions present in surface fines. Most macro- and micro-nutrients required for microbial growth [46
] have been identified in Martian meteorites [47
] and from in situ measurements [49
]; and recently, nitrates [51
], phosphates [49
], and organics [53
] have been discovered in Martian surface fines. However, the organics are likely not ubiquitous, and they might be composed of compounds not easily accessible by Terran microorganisms. Thus, growth assays with hypopiezotolerant microbes, incubated under low-PTA
environments, should be developed with oligotrophic (i.e., low-carbon) nutritional conditions in mind.
Fourth, positive growth must be at least twice the precision of the assays used. As described above, we propose that positive growth should only be claimed for soil-dilution assays if the recovered cell densities are ≥1 log higher than the initial populations. Soil dilution assays are not precise enough to measure growth when cell numbers are unchanged or decrease over time; other protocols (e.g., PCR, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and gas evolution) must be employed to avoid false positives for growth when cell numbers do not increase over time.