Next Article in Journal
Heavy Metal Stress Alters the Response of the Unicellular Cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 to Nitrogen Starvation
Next Article in Special Issue
Relative Biological Effectiveness of High LET Particles on the Reproductive System and Fetal Development
Previous Article in Journal
Expression Kinetics of Regulatory Genes Involved in the Vesicle Trafficking Processes Operating in Tomato Flower Abscission Zone Cells during Pedicel Abscission
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simultaneous Exposure of Cultured Human Lymphoblastic Cells to Simulated Microgravity and Radiation Increases Chromosome Aberrations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combined Environment Simulator for Low-Dose-Rate Radiation and Partial Gravity of Moon and Mars

1
Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
2
Matsuo Industries, Inc., 27-1, Ida, Kitasaki-machi, Obu, Aichi 474-0001, Japan
3
Division for the Establishment of Frontier Sciences of the Organization for Advanced Studies, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
4
Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
5
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Tsukuba Space Center, 2-1-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8505, Japan
6
Radiation Institute for Science & Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
7
Material Solutions Center, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2020, 10(11), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110274
Submission received: 23 September 2020 / Revised: 3 November 2020 / Accepted: 4 November 2020 / Published: 6 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiobiology in Space)

Abstract

:
Deep space exploration by humans has become more realistic, with planned returns to the Moon, travel to Mars, and beyond. Space radiation with a low dose rate would be a constant risk for space travelers. The combined effects of space radiation and partial gravity such as on the Moon and Mars are unknown. The difficulty for such research is that there are no good simulating systems on the ground to investigate these combined effects. To address this knowledge gap, we developed the Simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars with Neutron irradiation and Gravity change (SwiNG) for in vitro experiments using disposable closed cell culture chambers. The device simulates partial gravity using a centrifuge in a three-dimensional clinostat. Six samples are exposed at once to neutrons at a low dose rate (1 mGy/day) using Californium-252 in the center of the centrifuge. The system is compact including two SwiNG devices in the incubator, one with and one without radiation source, with a cooling function. This simulator is highly convenient for ground-based biological experiments because of limited access to spaceflight experiments. SwiNG can contribute significantly to research on the combined effects of space radiation and partial gravity.

1. Introduction

NASA has planned to return to the Moon by 2024 with a mission named Artemis. The mission will start building the Lunar Gateway and aims to be a trial for deeper space exploration. It will be an important step for landing humans on Mars. It is necessary to develop a simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars because the difference environment of space radiation and gravity condition in deep space as compared with Low Earth Orbit (LEO).
Space radiation environment is one of major risk factor in long-term exploration by humans. During LEO, the astronauts are protected from various space radiation by the Earth’s magnetic field. When they fly into the deep space, they need to pass through the trapped radiation belt composed with electrons and protons, and will be constantly exposed to solar particle events (SPEs) and galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), including high-energy heavy ions, without protection [1]. The longer the astronauts stay in deep space, the more the exposure to space radiation will be increased. No current spacecraft or spacesuit can shield astronauts from these energetic cosmic rays. Therefore, we need the ground-based experiments to simulate the space radiation environment. We can use the high-energy heavy-ion accelerators at specialized facilities such as the BEVALAC at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences of the National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST-NIRS), the GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research (GSI), and our Gunma University Heavy Ion Center (GHMC) [2] to expose biological samples. The majority of studies performed at these facilities were acute exposure of single radiation, fractioned doses, or combined sequential beams. In the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), SPE and GCR simulated beam can be used by rapid switching technology of ion species and ion energies [3]. Although we know that dose rates of space radiation are very low, it is challenging to perform exposure experiments with a low dose rate owing to the limited beam time allowed at such facilities. Recently, a concrete-shielded building on the campus of Colorado State University (CSU) was retrofitted with a panoramic Californium-252 (252Cf) source to allow low-dose-rate irradiation. The shielded vault can accommodate caging to simultaneously irradiate 900 mice and 60 rats for durations up to 400 days at a neutron dose rate of 1 mGy/day [4]. Long-term exposure to neutrons is a potential health hazard when astronauts encounter GCRs during their missions outside Earth’s magnetosphere. Despite that neutrons constitute a small proportion of GCRs, secondary neutrons ejected owing to interaction between GCRs and the shield elements are significant [5,6]. A major indicator is that the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET) of the low-dose-rate neutrons directly emitted from the 252Cf on Earth is close to that of the highly charged ions in space radiation. Furthermore, owing to the fundamental impact of primary and secondary scattered photons, high-energy neutrons emitted from 252Cf decomposition resemble the secondary ionizations of delta particle beams emitted from heavier high-energy charged particles [7]. Although they are a good substitute for the complex radiations that would be encountered in deep space, this ground experiment is in Earth’s gravity of 9.81 ms−2 (1G).
Partial gravity environments on the Moon and Mars are important to promote life science research, not only simulates microgravity (μG) in spaceflight environments. Advanced ground-based systems for simulating gravity alterations have made it possible to study the response of living beings to altered gravity to prepare for experiments in space. Media that reduce vertical acceleration to the partial gravity of the Moon (0.165G ≒ 1/3G) and Mars (0.378G ≒ 3/8G) or other celestial body can achieve the μG level or weightlessness [8]. Although a ballistic rocket, parabolic flight, or drop tower can produce a μG environment for free fall on the Earth, the disadvantages of these approaches are the limited time of exposing to μG and the additional hypergravity. To simulate μG, researchers have used rotating devices such as the Rotating Wall Vessel bioreactor (RWV: Synthecone, Houston, TX, USA) and the Random Positioning Machine (RPM: Dutch Space, Netherlands). These are components of devices that revolve the sample in an uninterrupted manner. These machines can oppose and balance the direction of gravity and diminish its impact, inducing μG [2]. Two main drawbacks to this concept are (i) revolution stops amid irradiation because the sample is susceptible to irradiation outside the incubator after or before rotation with an RWV [9,10,11,12,13], and (ii) the dose flatness in the irradiation area is non-uniform owing to irradiation from outside an RPM [14,15]. To deal with these limitations, we developed the System of Simultaneous irradiation in Simulated-μG (SSS) using a three-dimensional (3D) clinostat [16,17]. The SSS relies on X-ray irradiation with a high-speed shutter [16], and on carbon-ion irradiation with radiological technologies like accelerator systems and respiratory gating systems [17].
More than 50 years ago, a relatively large centrifuge outfitted with clinostats was used for experiments simulating partial gravity [18]. Other researchers applied a simple angled or inclined clinostat to generate partial gravity [19,20], and systems like centrifuge-clinostats were constructed [21,22]. Recently, researchers have developed devices using the RPM to simulate partial gravity [8]. As a next step, we need to investigate the effects of partial gravity on the biological response to radiation for manned missions to the Moon and Mars and compare them with those of both simulated μG and Earth gravity (1G). In this study, we develop the new Simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars with Neutron irradiation and Gravity change (SwiNG) (Figure 1).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. System Descriptions

The simulator is comprised of five subsystems: (1) a 3D clinostat, (2) a centrifuge, (3) a radiation source, (4) a sample chamber [23], and (5) an incubator. Its specifications are summarized in Table 1. The compact system (W 808 mm × D 820 mm × H 1550 mm) has two SwiNG devices, one with and one without a 252Cf source in the incubators with a cooling function.

2.2. Neutron Source

We calculated the amount of 252Cf required to provide a space-relevant dose rate of 1 mGy/day according to Borak et al. [4]. The shielding guide DP-1246 quotes the fission neutron yield as 2.4 × 1012 s−1 g−1 with a corresponding photon yield of 1.3 × 1013 s−1 g−1 [24]. The configuration of the facility was based on a panoramic irradiator encircled by a disposable closed cell culture chamber (DCC) at a radius of 100 mm from the radiation source. DP-1246 was used to estimate the initial quantity of 252Cf (neutron) required to provide a space-relevant dose rate of 1 mGy/day. Using the neutron yield for 252Cf, the fluence rate at 100 mm (Φn) is
Φn = 2.4 × 1012 s−1 g−1 ÷ (4π × 100 mm × 100 mm) = 19.1 × 106 mm−2 s−1 g−1
DP-1246 lists the dose rate conversion factor (Kn) for soft tissue in a phantom approximating a man as
Kn = 1.43 × 10−2 mGy h−1 mm2 s
The neutron dose rate at 100 mm (Dn) would be
Dn = Φn × Kn = 19.1 × 106 mm−2 s−1 g−1 × 1.43 × 10−2 mGy h−1 mm2 s = 27.3 × 104 mGy g−1 h−1
The desired neutron dose rate based on an exposure time of 24 h/day is
Dn = 1 mGy ÷ 24 h = 4.2 × 10−2 mGy h−1
Thus, the required amount of 252Cf is
252Cf = 4.2× 10−2 mGy h−1 ÷ (27.3 × 104 mGy g−1 h−1) = 15.4 × 10−8 g
The required activity of 252Cf is
252Cf Bq = (ln2 ÷ T s) × (W g ÷ M g mol−1) × NA mol−1
         = (0.693 ÷ (8.3 × 107 s)) × (15.4 × 10−8 g ÷ 252 g mol−1) × 6.0 × 1023 mol−1
= 3.1 × 106 s−1 = 3.1 × 106 Bq = 3.1 MBq      
where, T is the half-life (s), W is the weight (g), M is the molar mass (g mol−1), and NA is Avogadro’s constant (mol−1).
The unregulated sealed source containing 3.7 MBq 252Cf was delivered on 17 March 2020 from Japan Radioisotope Association (Tokyo, Japan). The 252Cf was used in accordance with the Recommendations for Regulation on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards, compiled by the Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Hazards Committee of Gunma University, Showa Campus.

2.3. Calculation of Dose Distribution

To determine the quantity of 252Cf necessary to achieve 1 mGy/day, a series of Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.17 [25,26].

2.4. Measurement of Dose Rate

The dosimeter (radiophoto-luminescence EN, Chiyoda Technol Co., Tokyo, Japan) was inserted into a special holder (Adachi Factory, Gunma, Japan) (Figure 2) and attached to an octagonal rotor as same as sample position with and without 252Cf for 24 h. The alpha rays generated by the interaction of neutrons with special filters consisted of high density polyethylene and boron nitride, and anti-jump protons generated by the reaction of neutrons with hydrogen atoms are used in the Wide-range Neutron Pit System (Chiyoda Technol Co., Tokyo, Japan). The neutron dose rate was measured indirectly by alpha rays and protons, and analyzed by Chiyoda Technol Co. using ISO8529. The data presented here are from three individual experiments.

2.5. Measurement of Gravity Using Accelerometer

A 3D accelerometer (ADXL335, Analog Devices, Norwood, MA, USA) was used to measure the gravitational accelerations at the sample position along the X, Y, and Z directions in the octagonal rotor. The accuracy of this sensor is ± 0.0069G. The gravitational accelerations were analyzed using original software (Matsuo Industries, Inc., Aichi, Japan).

2.6. Measurement of Temperature

A K-type thermometer (K-H0.1X1P, Ninomiya Electric Wire Co., Kanagawa, Japan) and a data logger (NR-600, KEYENCE Co., Osaka, Japan) were used to measure and record the temperatures of the centrifuge motor and the incubator including the device.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test. p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant in comparing samples.

3. Results

3.1. Simulation of Flatness and Symmetry in the Irradiation Fields

The dose distribution of the samples was uniform along the X and Y axes (Figure 3). The assumed radius of the center was 32, 50, and 100 mm in the square, hexagonal, and octagonal rotor (Figure 3A). The square, hexagonal, and octagonal rotors took two, four, and six DCCs, respectively, in addition to a dosimeter and an accelerometer. The dose rate is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the radiation source (Figure 3B). When it is away from the center in the X and Y directions, the relative dose rate of the DCC was shown in Figure 3C. The radiation dose distribution was simulated with PHITS for each rotor (Figure 3D). These results suggest that the octagonal rotor is the ideal choice for uniform dose distribution of radiation. The radiation covers a greater total DCC area with the octagonal rotor than with the hexagonal rotor, which in turn achieves more total area radiation coverage than the square rotor (Figure 3E). Based on the data, we have decided to adopt the octagonal rotor in SwiNG.
The estimated data in Table 2 confirm that the dose uniformly covers the DCC area (Figure 3C). With point a in Figure 3B being the intersection of the X and Y axes and receiving 100% of the dose, the difference in dose delivery between point b (the short end) and point a (the center) is less than 3%, and the difference in dose delivery between point c (the most distant long-end point) and point a is less than 10%, confirming uniform dose delivery (Table 2).

3.2. Measurement of Dose Rate

The measured dose rates were comparable with the theoretical dose rate about 1 mGy/day at the center of the sample in the octagonal device with 252Cf (No. 2) within the nominal range (Table 2 and Table 3). The dose rate of γ-ray by the disintegration of 252Cf was 0.5 ± 0.1 mGy/day at the sample position.
Since the control samples in the device without 252Cf (No. 1) are ca 800–1000 mm away from the 252Cf in No. 2 incubator, the dose rate of control sample is assumed at least 1/64–1/100 that of the irradiation sample in the device with 252Cf (No. 2). In fact, the dose rate of control group in the device without 252Cf (No. 1) was below the detection limit. The data of environmental radiation monitoring around SwiNG was shown in Table 4.

3.3. Simulation of Flatness and Symmetry in the Gravity Fields

For the octagonal rotor, the assumed distances from the center axis of the centrifuge were 100 mm and 100–101 mm along the Y and X axes of the sample. The theoretical relative centrifugal force (RCF) distributions of the samples were equal along the Y axis and almost equal along the X axis.

3.4. Measurement of Gravity

The simulator could reproduce from μG up to 2G. At each rotation speed, the theoretical and measured RCFs of SwiNG nos. 1 and 2 were almost the same (Table 5 and Figure 4). After about 20 s, the measured integrated RCF was very stable (Figure 4).

3.5. Measurement of Temperature

Although the temperature of the centrifuge motor at 133.0 rpm was the maximum of 38 °C, the temperature in the incubator including the device was 37 ± 0.2 °C when set to 37 °C (data not shown). As the sample holder of the rotor was made of plastic (polybutylene terephthalate—30% glass fiber, PBT-GF30), heat from the motor did not conduct to the samples.

4. Discussion

The new compact simulator, SwiNG, was developed to expose samples to low-dose-rate neutron radiation (1 mGy/day) from 252Cf under partial gravity using a centrifuge (r = 100 mm) in a 3D clinostat (Figure 1). Using a centrifuge (r = 100 mm), the PHITS simulation confirmed our system’s ability to provide uniform dose distribution (Figure 3Diii). In our new system, radiation source is located at the center of the chamber in the rotor, and surface of the samples are constantly facing to the radiation source. Although we measured the dose rate at center of sample position only at 1G (Table 3), it is unlikely that the dose will change under any gravity for each of the centrifuge cases. The reasons were that the distance between the neutron source and the sample is constant at 100 mm. Further, motors 2 and 3 are constantly rotating under each gravitational condition, so that the effects of scattered radiation in the incubator is uniform on the samples. Interesting results have been reported with mice exposed to low-dose neutrons using 252Cf at CSU [28,29,30]. New discoveries can be expected with our new simulator system.
We confirmed that the system can instantaneously change the gravity environment (Figure 4) in addition to providing low-dose radiation exposure. The rotation speed of the centrifuge can be changed in accordance with the user’s purpose and choice of samples to simulate partial gravity. Moreover, the simulator can reproduce μG, the Earth control of 1G, and hypergravity condition (up to 2G) of launch and landing to Earth. Another advantage of our new system is that six samples can be exposed to radiation at the same time.
We are planning to use DCCs for in vitro biological experiments such as DNA damage, chromosomal aberrations, gene expression changes, and so on using cultured cells. The chamber can be completely filled with a medium (without bubbles) to eliminate shear stress on the cells or minimize it as much as possible [31]. Shear stress is reported to be almost negligible in the absence of air bubbles in a slowly rotating medium [32]. We have already validated DCCs using human fibroblasts and lymphoblasts cultured with a CO2-independent medium (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and found no problems with cell growth under atmospheric conditions [17,33,34]. This DCC chamber can exchange the gas thorough the special gas permeable membrane [23]. Therefore, the oxygen available inside the DCC is available from the atmosphere and is sufficient for cell metabolism, and CO2 will be supplied from buffered medium. Furthermore, the temperature of the sample can be easily controlled and maintained under suitable conditions in the incubators with a cooling function. Besides human cell cultures, the simulator can be used for microorganisms such as bacteria, yeast, Pyrocystis noctiluca or Dictyostelium discoideum which has been used in past ground-based experiments and/or space experiments [35,36,37,38,39,40].
To confirm experimental results obtained from in vitro experiments with our simulating system, it will be important to perform in vivo experiments with partial gravity such as quadrupedal unloading [41,42,43,44] on the ground. The effects should be tested either in a proper centrifuge experiment on the ISS, such as the Cell Biology Equipment Facility (CBEF) [45] and mouse habitat unit (MHU) cage [46], or on the actual surfaces of the Moon and Mars.

5. Conclusions

We developed the SwiNG for simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars with low-dose-rate (1 mGy/day) irradiation and partial gravity, and evaluated the physical performance of the hardware using theoretical and measured values of neutron dose rate and averaged gravity at the sample position in octagonal rotator. The simulator is highly convenient for space biology research because of the limited availability of space experiments. The basic data from ground experiments using our system are expected to help develop a new biological parameter for evaluating human health risks in space radiation involving radiological protection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T., K.T. (Kazuomi Takeuchi), S.T., Y.Y., J.H., A.H., M.H. and Y.S.; methodology, M.T. and A.N.; validation, K.T. (Kazuomi Takeuchi), S.T., K.T. (Kunihito Takeuchi), T.T. and S.Y.; formal analysis, S.Y.; investigation, S.Y., S.Z. and F.N.L.G.; resources, K.T. (Kazuomi Takeuchi), S.T., T.A., K.T. (Kunihito Takeuchi), T.T. and S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Z., F.N. and A.T.; writing—review and editing, S.T., M.T., A.N. and M.H.; supervision, Y.S.; project administration, A.T.; funding acquisition, A.T. and M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA Front Loading Study, MEXT Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, Japan “Living in Space” (grant nos. JP15H05945, JP15H05935, and JP15K21745) and NASA Space Biology Program (grant no. 80NSSC19K0133).

Acknowledgments

We thank Kei Shibuya (Gunma University) for allowing us to use 252Cf at Gunma University, and Yukihiko Sejimo and Miyako Kido (Chiyoda Technol Co.) for conducting the 252Cf dosimetry. Mark Kurban from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) edited a draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Takahashi, A.; Ikeda, H.; Yoshida, Y. Role of high-linear energy transfer radiobiology in space radiation exposure risk. Int. J. Part. Ther. 2018, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Furukawa, S.; Nagamatsu, A.; Nenoi, M.; Fujimori, A.; Kakinuma, S.; Katsube, T.; Wang, B.; Tsuruoka, C.; Shirai, T.; Nakamura, A.J.; et al. Space radiation biology for “Living in Space”. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 4703286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Simonsen, L.C.; Slaba, T.C.; Guida, P.; Rusek, A. NASA’s first ground-based Galactic Cosmic Ray Simulator: Enabling a new era in space radiobiology research. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Borak, T.B.; Heilbronn, L.H.; Krumland, N.; Weil, M.M. Design and dosimetry of a facility to study health effects following exposures to fission neutrons at low dose rates for long durations. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Norbury, J.; Slaba, T. Space radiation accelerator experiments: The role of neutrons and light ions. Life Sci. Space Res. 2014, 3, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nelson, G.A. Space radiation and human exposures, a primer. Radiat. Res. 2016, 185, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chatterjee, A.; Borak, T.H. Physical and biological studies with protons and HZE particles in a NASA supported research center in radiation health. Phys. Med. 2001, 17, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  8. Manzano, A.; Herranz, R.; den Toom, L.A.; Te Slaa, S.; Borst, G.; Visser, M.; Medina, F.J.; van Loon, J.J.W.A. Novel, Moon and Mars, partial gravity simulation paradigms and their effects on the balance between cell growth and cell proliferation during early plant development. NPJ Microgravity 2018, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Risin, D.; Pellis, N.R. Modeled microgravity inhibits apoptosis in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2001, 37, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Canova, A.; Fiorasi, F.; Mognato, M.; Grifalconi, M.; Reddi, E.; Russo, A.; Celotti, L. Modeled microgravity affects cell response to ionizing radiation and increases genomic damage. Radiat. Res. 2005, 163, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mognato, M.; Celotti, L. Modeled microgravity affects cell survival and HPRT mutant frequency, but not the expression of DNA repair genes in human lymphocytes irradiated with ionising radiation. Mutat. Res. 2005, 578, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mognato, M.; Girardi, C.; Fabris, S.; Celotti, L. DNA repair in modeled microgravity: Double strand break rejoining activity in human lymphocytes irradiated with γ-rays. Mutat. Res. 2009, 663, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dang, B.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, E.; Li, W.; Mi, X.; Meng, Y.; Yan, S.; Wang, Z.; Wei, W.; Shao, C.; et al. Simulated microgravity increases heavy ion radiation-induced apoptosis in human B lymphoblasts. Life Sci. 2014, 97, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Girardi, C.; De Pittà, C.; Casara, S.; Sales, G.; Lanfranchi, G.; Celotti, L.; Mognato, M. Analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression profiles highlights alterations in ionizing radiation response of human lymphocytes under modeled microgravity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Beck, M.; Moreels, M.; Quintens, R.; Abou-El-Ardat, K.; El-Saghire, H.; Tabury, K.; Michaux, A.; Janssen, A.; Neefs, M.; Van Oostveldt, P.; et al. Chronic exposure to simulated space conditions predominantly affects cytoskeleton remodeling and oxidative stress response in mouse fetal fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 34, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ikeda, H.; Souda, H.; Puspitasari, A.; Held, K.D.; Hidema, J.; Nikawa, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Kanai, T.; Takahashi, A. A new system for three-dimensional clinostat synchronized X-irradiation with a high-speed shutter for space radiation research. Biol. Sci. Space 2016, 30, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ikeda, H.; Souda, H.; Puspitasari, A.; Held, K.D.; Hidema, J.; Nikawa, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Kanai, T.; Takahashi, A. Development and performance evaluation of a three-dimensional clinostat synchronized heavy-ion irradiation system. Life Sci. Space Res. 2017, 12, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen-Miller, J.; Hinchman, R.; Gordon, S.A. Thresholds for georesponse to acceleration in gravity-compensated Avena seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1968, 43, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lyon, C.J. Lateral transport of auxin mediated by gravity in the absence of special georeceptor tissue. Plant Physiol. 1971, 48, 642–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Brown, A.H.; Dahl, A.O.; Chapman, D.K. Limitation on the use of the horizontal clinostat as a gravity compensator. Plant Physiol. 1976, 58, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Laurinavicius, R.; Svegzdiene, D.; Buchen, B.; Sievers, A. Determination of the threshold acceleration for the gravitropic stimulation of cress roots and hypocotyls. Adv. Space Res. 1998, 21, 1203–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Galland, P.; Finger, H.; Wallacher, Y. Gravitropism in Phycomyces: Threshold determination on a clinostat centrifuge. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tanigawa, N.; Yano, S.; Higashibata, A.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Tanii, H.; Ando, N.; Kubota, K.; Nagase, M. Development and validation of a closed chamber for cell culture experiments in space. Biol. Sci. Space 2014, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stoddard, D.H.; Hootman, H.E. 252Cf Shielding Guide, DP-1246; Savannah River Laboratory: Aiken, SC, USA, 1971.
  25. Iwamoto, Y.; Sato, T.; Hashimoto, S.; Ogawa, T.; Furuta, T.; Abe, S.; Kai, T.; Matsuda, N.; Hosoyamada, R.; Niita, K. Benchmark study of the recent version of the PHITS code. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 617–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sato, T.; Iwamoto, Y.; Hashimoto, S.; Ogawa, T.; Furuta, T.; Abe, S.; Kai, T.; Tsai, P.-E.; Matsuda, N.; Iwase, H.; et al. Features of Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.02. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 684–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Valentin, J. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (wR): ICRP Publication 92. Ann. ICRP 2003, 33, 1–121. [Google Scholar]
  28. Acharya, M.M.; Baulch, J.E.; Klein, P.M.; Baddour, A.A.D.; Apodaca, L.A.; Kramár, E.A.; Alikhani, L.; Garcia, C., Jr.; Angulo, M.C.; Batra, R.S.; et al. New concerns for neurocognitive function during deep space exposures to chronic, low dose-rate, neutron radiation. eNeuro 2019, 6, ENEURO.0094-19.2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Britten, R.A.; Duncan, V.D.; Fesshaye, A.S.; Wellman, L.L.; Fallgren, C.M.; Sanford, L.D. Sleep fragmentation exacerbates executive function impairments induced by protracted low dose rate neutron exposure. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perez, R.E.; Younger, S.; Bertheau, E.; Fallgren, C.M.; Weil, M.M.; Raber, J. Effects of chronic exposure to a mixed field of neutrons and photons on behavioral and cognitive performance in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2020, 379, 112377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ikeda, H.; Muratani, M.; Hidema, J.; Hada, M.; Fujiwara, K.; Souda, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Takahashi, A. Expression profile of cell cycle-related genes in human fibroblasts exposed simultaneously to radiation and simulated microgravity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Todd, P. Physical effects at the cellular level under altered gravity conditions. Adv. Space Res. 1992, 12, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hada, M.; Ikeda, H.; Rhone, J.R.; Beitman, A.J.; Plante, I.; Souda, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Held, K.D.; Fujiwara, K.; Saganti, P.B.; et al. Increased chromosome aberrations in cells exposed simultaneously to simulated microgravity and radiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yamanouchi, S.; Rhone, J.R.; Mao, J.-H.; Fujiwara, K.; Saganti, P.B.; Takahashi, A.; Hada, M. Simultaneous exposure of cultured human lymphoblastic cells to simulated microgravity and radiation increases chromosome aberrations. Life 2020, 10, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ohnishi, T.; Takahashi, A.; Okaichi, K.; Ohnishi, K.; Matsumoto, H.; Takahashi, S.; Yamanaka, H.; Nakano, T.; Nagaoka, S. Cell growth and morphology of Dictyostelium discoideum in space environment. Biol. Sci. Space 1997, 11, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Takahashi, A.; Ohnishi, K.; Fukui, M.; Nakano, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nagaoka, S.; Ohnishi, T. Mutation frequency of Dictyostelium discoideum spores exposed to the space environment. Biol. Sci. Space 1997, 11, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Takahashi, A.; Ohnishi, K.; Takahashi, S.; Masukawa, M.; Sekikawa, K.; Amano, T.; Nakano, T.; Nagaoka, S.; Ohnishi, T. Differentiation of Dictyostelium discoideum vegetative cells into spores during Earth orbit in space. Adv. Space Res. 2001, 28, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Takahashi, A.; Ohnishi, K.; Takahashi, S.; Masukawa, M.; Sekikawa, K.; Amano, T.; Nakano, T.; Nagaoka, S.; Ohnishi, T. The effects of microgravity on induced mutation in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Space Res. 2001, 28, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Takahashi, A.; Ohnishi, K.; Yokota, A.; Kumagai, T.; Nakano, T.; Ohnishi, T. Mutation frequency of plasmid DNA and Escherichia coli following long-term space flight on Mir. J. Radiat. Res. 2002, 43, S137–S140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hauslage, J.; Cevik, V.; Hemmersbach, R. Pyrocystis noctiluca represents an excellent bioassay for shear forces induced in ground-based microgravity simulators (clinostat and random positioning machine). NPJ Microgravity 2017, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wagner, E.B.; Granzella, N.P.; Saito, H.; Newman, D.J.; Young, L.R.; Bouxsein, M.L. Partial weight suspension: A novel murine model for investigating adaptation to reduced musculoskeletal loading. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 109, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wilson, J.M.; Krigsfeld, G.S.; Sanzari, J.K.; Wagner, E.B.; Mick, R.; Kennedy, A.R. Comparison of hindlimb unloading and partial weight suspension models for spaceflight-type condition induced effects on white blood cells. Adv. Space Res. 2012, 49, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ellman, R.; Spatz, J.; Cloutier, A.; Palme, R.; Christiansen, B.A.; Bouxsein, M.L. Partial reductions in mechanical loading yield proportional changes in bone density, bone architecture, and muscle mass. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013, 28, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mortreux, M.; Ko, F.C.; Riveros, D.; Bouxsein, M.L.; Rutkove, S.B. Longitudinal time course of muscle impairments during partial weight-bearing in rats. NPJ Microgravity 2019, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ishioka, N.; Suzuki, H.; Asashima, M.; Kamisaka, S.; Mogami, Y.; Ochiai, T.; Aizawa-Yano, S.; Higashibata, A.; Ando, N.; Nagase, M.; et al. Development and verification of hardware for life science experiments in the Japanese Experiment Module “Kibo” on the International Space Station. J. Gravit. Physiol. 2004, 11, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shiba, D.; Mizuno, H.; Yumoto, A.; Shimomura, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Morita, H.; Shimbo, M.; Hamada, M.; Kudo, T.; Shinohara, M.; et al. Development of new experimental platform ‘MARS’-Multiple Artificial-gravity Research System-to elucidate the impacts of micro/partial gravity on mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schema of the Simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars with Neutron irradiation and Gravity change (SwiNG). (A) Overview. (B) Outside view, and inside view of the rotor, where “x” is the radiation source, and “a” is the center, “b” is the short end, and “c” is the long end of the disposable closed cell culture chamber (DCC). (C) Setting a culture chamber in the rotor, which consists of (i) injecting the DCC and (ii) turning the stopper, after which (iii) the installation is complete.
Figure 1. Schema of the Simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars with Neutron irradiation and Gravity change (SwiNG). (A) Overview. (B) Outside view, and inside view of the rotor, where “x” is the radiation source, and “a” is the center, “b” is the short end, and “c” is the long end of the disposable closed cell culture chamber (DCC). (C) Setting a culture chamber in the rotor, which consists of (i) injecting the DCC and (ii) turning the stopper, after which (iii) the installation is complete.
Life 10 00274 g001
Figure 2. Glass badge dosimeter unit. (A) Overview of dosimeter in a special holder. (B) Front view of dosimeter’s internal structure. (C) Side view of dosimeter’s internal structure (technical data from Chiyoda Technol Co., Tokyo, Japan).
Figure 2. Glass badge dosimeter unit. (A) Overview of dosimeter in a special holder. (B) Front view of dosimeter’s internal structure. (C) Side view of dosimeter’s internal structure (technical data from Chiyoda Technol Co., Tokyo, Japan).
Life 10 00274 g002
Figure 3. Theoretical radiation dose against rotor size. (A) Rotor: (i) square, (ii) hexagonal, and (iii) octagonal. (B) DCC. Dashed lines indicate actual positions of cells in a culture chamber, where “a” is the center, “b” is the short end, and “c” is the long end of the DCC. (C) Relative dose against distance from the intersection of the X and Y axes; the relative dose is 100% at the intersection of X and Y. (D) Dose distribution simulated with PHITS. (E) Dose area histogram.
Figure 3. Theoretical radiation dose against rotor size. (A) Rotor: (i) square, (ii) hexagonal, and (iii) octagonal. (B) DCC. Dashed lines indicate actual positions of cells in a culture chamber, where “a” is the center, “b” is the short end, and “c” is the long end of the DCC. (C) Relative dose against distance from the intersection of the X and Y axes; the relative dose is 100% at the intersection of X and Y. (D) Dose distribution simulated with PHITS. (E) Dose area histogram.
Life 10 00274 g003
Figure 4. Measured integrated RCF for different rotary speeds of motor 1 during 1-min rotation. The rotary speeds of motors 2 and 3 were 13.0 and 11.0 rpm, respectively.
Figure 4. Measured integrated RCF for different rotary speeds of motor 1 during 1-min rotation. The rotary speeds of motors 2 and 3 were 13.0 and 11.0 rpm, respectively.
Life 10 00274 g004
Table 1. Specifications of the Simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars with Neutron irradiation and Gravity change (SwiNG).
Table 1. Specifications of the Simulator of the environments on the Moon and Mars with Neutron irradiation and Gravity change (SwiNG).
SubsystemSpecifications
3D clinostatExternal size: W 490 mm × D 445.7 mm × H 479.6 mm
Rotational velocity: 66°/s and 78°/s
Manufacturer: Matsuo Industries, Inc. (Aichi, Japan)
CentrifugeRotor size: W 216 mm × D 216 mm × H 90 mm (octagonal type)
Speed control range: 27–133 rpm
Manufacturer: Matsuo Industries, Inc.
Radiation source252Cf (N-252CE, Japan Radioisotope Association, Tokyo, Japan)
External size: Diameter 9.4 mm × L 36.3 mm
Dose-equivalent average energy: 2.3 MeV
Dose-averaged LET: 68 keV/μm
Half-life: 2.645 years
Sample chamberDisposable closed cell culture chamber (DCC, Chiyoda Co., Kanagawa, Japan)
External size: W 86.0 mm × D 50.0 mm × H 7.3 mm
Cultivation area: 15.5 cm2 (W 65 mm × D 35 mm)
Liquid depth: 3 mm
Material: polystyrene (bottom thickness: 1 mm; top thickness: 50 µm)
Six DCCs can be placed in the rotor
IncubatorLow-temperature incubator without control of CO2 concentrations: LTE-510 (Tokyo Rikakikai Co., Tokyo, Japan)
Internal size: W 600 mm × D 500 mm × H 500 mm
Temperature control range/accuracy: −10–60 °C/±0.2 °C
Table 2. Theoretical neutron dose rate of 3.7 MBq 252Cf.
Table 2. Theoretical neutron dose rate of 3.7 MBq 252Cf.
Position of DCC * in Octagonal RotorDistance from 252CfTheoretical Dose Rate Relative Value
a (center)100.0 mm1.23 ± 0.18 mGy/day100.0
b (short end)101.5 mm1.19 ± 0.18 mGy/day97.1
c (long end)105.1 mm1.11 ± 0.17 mGy/day90.5
* See Figure 1B and Figure 2C. Nominal value ± 15%.
Table 3. Using glass badge, measured radiation dose equivalent at the control sample and the irradiation sample position of SwiNG for 24 h.
Table 3. Using glass badge, measured radiation dose equivalent at the control sample and the irradiation sample position of SwiNG for 24 h.
Control SamplesIrradiation Samples
Incubator of SwiNGNo. 1No. 2
Neutron * ND10.8 ± 0.0 mSv
Total dose rate ND1.08 ± 0.00 mGy/day
Measurement date, 18–21 March, 2020. * 1 cm dose equivalent. ND, not detected. The dose rate was determined from the dose equivalent. The radiation weighting factor of neutron (252Cf, 2.1 MeV) was calculated as 10 [27].
Table 4. The environmental radiation monitoring around SwiNG.
Table 4. The environmental radiation monitoring around SwiNG.
Position γ-rayNeutronTotal
The surface of SwiNG1.5 µSv/h18.4 µSv/h19.9 µSv/h
1 m distance from 252Cf0.3 µSv/h6.7 µSv/h7.0 µSv/h
2 m distance from 252Cf0.2 µSv/h2.5 µSv/h2.7 µSv/h
Table 5. Simulated relation between centrifuge rotation and gravity at the sample position of SwiNG.
Table 5. Simulated relation between centrifuge rotation and gravity at the sample position of SwiNG.
Rotary Speed of Motor 1 (Centrifuge) *Theoretical RCF
(r = 100–101 mm)
Measured RCF Simulation
No. 1No. 2
0.0 rpmG0.01 ± 0.00G0.01 ± 0.00Ginterplanetary space
38.4 rpm0.165–0.167G0.17 ± 0.00G0.17 ± 0.00Gon the Moon
58.1 rpm0.377–0.381G0.38 ± 0.00G0.39 ± 0.00Gon Mars
94.5 rpm0.998–1.008G1.01 ± 0.00G1.01 ± 0.00Gon the Earth
133.0 rpm1.978–1.997G1.98 ± 0.01G2.00 ± 0.00Ghypergravity
* The rotary speeds of motors 2 and 3 were 13.0 and 11.0 rpm, respectively. RCF (Relative centrifugal force) = 1.118 × r [mm] × N2 [rpm] × 10−6. The presented results are the mean and SD of three independent experiments.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takahashi, A.; Yamanouchi, S.; Takeuchi, K.; Takahashi, S.; Tashiro, M.; Hidema, J.; Higashitani, A.; Adachi, T.; Zhang, S.; Guirguis, F.N.L.; et al. Combined Environment Simulator for Low-Dose-Rate Radiation and Partial Gravity of Moon and Mars. Life 2020, 10, 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110274

AMA Style

Takahashi A, Yamanouchi S, Takeuchi K, Takahashi S, Tashiro M, Hidema J, Higashitani A, Adachi T, Zhang S, Guirguis FNL, et al. Combined Environment Simulator for Low-Dose-Rate Radiation and Partial Gravity of Moon and Mars. Life. 2020; 10(11):274. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takahashi, Akihisa, Sakuya Yamanouchi, Kazuomi Takeuchi, Shogo Takahashi, Mutsumi Tashiro, Jun Hidema, Atsushi Higashitani, Takuya Adachi, Shenke Zhang, Fady Nagy Lotfy Guirguis, and et al. 2020. "Combined Environment Simulator for Low-Dose-Rate Radiation and Partial Gravity of Moon and Mars" Life 10, no. 11: 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop