Next Article in Journal
Threshold Value Determination Using Machine Learning Algorithms for Ba Interference with Eu in Coal and Coal Combustion Products by ICP-MS
Next Article in Special Issue
Coupling Mineralogy, Textures, Stable and Radiogenic Isotopes in Identifying Ore-Forming Processes in Irish-Type Carbonate-Hosted Zn–Pb Deposits
Previous Article in Journal
Petrogenesis of the Early Cretaceous Tiantangshan A-Type Granite, Cathaysia Block, SE China: Implication for the Tin Mineralization
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Moroccan Massive Sulphide Deposits: Evidence for a Polyphase Mineralization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

He-Ar Isotopes and Trace Gas Compositions of Fluid Inclusions in Massive Sulphides from the Yushui Copper-Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Metallogenic Implications

1
South China Sea Institute of Planning and Environmental Research, State Oceanic Administration, Guangzhou 510300, China
2
School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, Guangzhou 510006, China
4
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
5
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519000, China
6
Fourth Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beihai 536000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Minerals 2019, 9(5), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9050258
Submission received: 29 March 2019 / Revised: 23 April 2019 / Accepted: 24 April 2019 / Published: 29 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Massive Sulfide Deposits all around the World)

Abstract

:
The Yushui ore deposit, located in the middle section of the Yong’an-Meixian Hercynian depression, is a medium-sized Cu-polymetallic massive sulphide deposit in Eastern Guangdong Province, South China. This deposit is characterized by unusually high copper grade (up to 50–60 wt. % Cu). Other metallic elements, such as lead, zinc and silver, are also economically important in the Yushui ore bodies. The aim of this study was to apply N2–Ar–He systematics, together with organic gases (light-hydrocarbon tracers), to constrain the origin and evolution of ore-forming fluids. The helium-argon isotopes and trace gas compositions of fluid inclusions trapped within metal sulphide minerals were measured for a number of bonanza ores from the Yushui deposit. The noble gas concentrations in the studied samples vary over one to two orders of magnitude (4He: 2.27–160.00 × 10−5 cm3 STP g−1; 3He: 0.53–34.88 × 10−12 cm3 STP g−1; 40Ar: 6.28–37.82 × 10−7 cm3 STP g−1; 36Ar: 1.25–10.40 × 10−9 cm3 STP g−1). Our data show a narrow range of 3He/4He ratios from 0.006 to 0.056 Ra (~0.026 Ra on average, n = 8), which are considerably lower than the modern atmospheric end-member value; whereas the 40Ar/36Ar ratios (ranging from 333.76 to 501.68, with an average of 397.53) are significantly greater than that of air-saturated water. Most of the bornite samples have somewhat higher 3He/4He ratios of trapped fluids when compared to chalcopyrite. Overall, these He-Ar results are well within the range of crustal reservoir, thus implying a predominantly crustal source (originated from Caledonian basement) for ore-forming solutions, with little contribution from mantle-derived fluids. Analysis of the N2–Ar–He composition in Cu-rich sulphides indicates that the Yushui ore-forming fluids were probably derived from formation water (or basinal hot brines). Moreover, organic gas species identified in sulphide-hosted fluid inclusions are mainly composed of C1–C4 alkanes, while the concentrations of unsaturated olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons are very low. In particular, most chalcopyrite samples with relatively low 3He/4He ratios (0.006–0.016 Ra) and 40Ar*/4He values (0.0002–0.0012) are generally characterized by very high CO2/CH4 ratios (~60–102). All these suggest that main-stage Cu-Ag metallogenic processes might have not been affected by high-temperature magmatic activities or superimposed by strong metamorphic overprinting, although some chalcopyrite-rich ores appear to be influenced by later stage hydrothermal processes. In summary, neither magmatic input nor convecting seawater has played an important role in the formation of Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit. The massive sulphide ore bodies were products of water–rock interaction between metal-bearing basinal brines and the host sedimentary strata.

1. Introduction

The most important base-metal ore fields in South China are represented by a number of sediment-hosted, stratabound massive sulphide deposits, which mostly occur within a series of Late Palaeozoic (Hercynian–Indosinian) intracontinental rift basins [1]. Among these deposits, the Yushui ore deposit is one of the most Cu-rich massive sulphide deposits yet found in Southern China [1,2,3]. It is located in the eastern Nanling metallogenic belt, about 13 km away from Meixian County of Guangdong Province. Being a medium-sized Cu-polymetallic deposit, this deposit is also high in Pb, Zn and Ag, as well as rare earth elements (REEs) [2,3,4,5]. First discovered in the late 1980s, the Yushui deposit has attracted considerable attention and research interest from Chinese economic geologists, owing to extremely high copper grades of its ore bodies (approximately 3.25% Cu on average) formed in a small area (~0.2 km2) [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. In some of the richest bonanza ore bodies, their typical grades can even reach as high as 50–60 wt. % Cu, with recoverable Ag (up to 10,000 ppm) [11,13]. By contrast, average ore grades of most copper deposits in China are generally low (~0.87 wt. % Cu) [14]. In other words, the Yushui ore deposit represents one of only a few unique examples of polymetallic massive sulphide deposits that contain some of the highest levels of Cu and Ag ever reported in southern China [1]. Therefore, comprehensive studies of this deposit can guide further exploration for a similar style of Cu-Pb-Zn-(Ag) mineralization in the Nanling Region.
However, the genesis and ore-forming mechanism of the Yushui Cu-polymetallic deposit has been somewhat controversial over the past thirty years [1,2,3,5,8,9,10,11,12]. Although once regarded as a sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX) or Mississippi Valley-type (MVT-like) deposit [2,10,12], it was thought to be of magmatic-hydrothermal origin at first, because of the observed phenomenon that its host strata were commonly intruded by Mesozoic diabase dykes and granitoids [3,8]. Some authors have also proposed that this deposit was originally formed by ancient (Late Palaeozoic) submarine exhalation-sedimentation and was then transformed/superimposed by Yanshanian diabase or granitoid intrusions as well as related hydrothermal fluids [5]. Although this view has been widely accepted by many researchers [1,11,15], the major source of ore-forming fluids still remains to be a matter of continuing debate [8,12]. This research focuses on whether the metal-bearing solutions were mainly derived from the Yanshanian magmatic-hydrothermal fluids or originated from the mixture of deep-/shallow-circulating meteoric water (or seawater) and old Caledonian basement components during a Carboniferous syn-sedimentary exhalative hydrothermal event. Furthermore, the composition of trace gases in fluid inclusions trapped in the Yushui sulphide minerals and the evolution of ore-forming fluids through multiple stages of polymetallic mineralisation are also poorly understood.
To address the above-mentioned questions, the application of noble gas (especially helium and argon) isotope geochemistry is key to defining the origin of ore-forming fluids. In particular, as a monatomic chemically inert gas (3He behaves extremely conservatively during mixing of mantle-/crustal-derived fluids with meteoric water), helium is considered to be one of the most sensitive geochemical tracers for such studies and has distinct isotopic signatures in different types of geological reservoirs [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. For ancient polymetallic ore deposits, the He-Ar isotopic compositions of hydrothermal fluids are faithfully preserved when trapped as fluid inclusions by mineral phases such as pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, or galena, and thus can be widely used to reveal the degree of fluid-rock interaction, mantle degassing or magmatic activity [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Additionally, quantitative bulk sample analysis of the ratios among conservative trace gas species N2, Ar, and He can help to estimate the amounts of magmatic, crustal and meteoric gaseous constituents in geothermal fluids [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. Moreover, the concentrations and distribution features of light organic compounds (LOC, including methane) in fluid inclusions from a variety of hydrothermal systems or massive sulphide deposits can also serve as an important and powerful tool to interpret the various sources of organic species, as well as to illustrate fluid boiling/mixing processes, and provide useful information about the intensity of wall-rock alterations [56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. Therefore, an integrated study of the He-Ar isotopic systematics, combined with the N2–Ar–He or CH4/CO2 ratios of fluid inclusion volatiles, allows us to further develop our understanding of fluid evolution and metallogenic processes in the Yushui copper-polymetallic ore deposit, South China.

2. Geological Setting

2.1. Regional Background of the Yushui Deposit

The Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit is located in the middle section of the Yong’an–Meixian Late Paleozoic Hercynian depression. The Zhenghe-Dapu and Shaowu-Heyuan regional faults (formed in an extensional tectonic setting induced by lithospheric thinning and asthenospheric upwelling) [67] comprise the east and west boundaries of the depression zone, respectively. As shown in Figure 1A, this NNE-trending depression is approximately 500 km long and 150 km wide. It extends from Jiangle and Yong’an (Fujian Province) at its north end to Huizhou (Guangdong Province) in the south. The regional geological evolution is considered to have occurred in three stages: (1) passive continental margin, (2) part of the Cathaysia Block (or defined as South China Caledonian-aged fold belt), and (3) active continental margin [68,69,70]. During the Sinian-Early Paleozoic period (ca. 750–500 Ma), this region was part of the Proto-Tethys Ocean. Before the Middle Cambrian, a geosynclinal depression filled with thick (>2000 m) flyschoid units had been formed in the study area. The southern part of the Proto-Tethys Ocean was gradually closed in the early Paleozoic, which might be linked to the Wuyi-Yunkai orogeny in South China (460–415 Ma) [71]. As a result, the sedimentary sequence was folded and then uplifted, leading to the formation of a basement with the absence of younger rocks (the Ordovician to Lower Devonian) in this region. During the Devonian–Middle Triassic, a paraplatform environment developed with an entire cycle of transgression and regression. The transgression peaked in the Late Carboniferous, and then a shallow-marine carbonate platform formed. Afterwards, regional extension resulted in a series of steep faults along the pre-existing basement structure with a NE-ENE trend. In the Middle–Late Triassic, this region became an active continental margin during the period of Indosinian tectonic movement (ca. 250–200 Ma) [11,72].
The regional stratigraphy is subdivided from bottom to top into five units (Figure 1B).
(1)
Middle Devonian–Lower Carboniferous (D2-C1): primarily medium- to fine-grained quartz sandstone, pebbly quartz sandstone, conglomerate with thin-bedded mudstone and siltstone, representing clastic rock formation characterized by neritic-littoral facies. This set of strata tilt to the northeast, with a dip angle of 25 to 30 degrees and a thickness greater than 300 m [73].
(2)
Upper Carboniferous Hutian Group (C2ht): dominated by dolomite with dolomitic limestone and limestone, or accompanied by thin layers of irregular light-colored chert, quartz sandstone, and mudstone, suggesting a neritic to littoral facies of carbonate rocks, overlying the Middle Devonian–Lower Carboniferous clastic rocks with a low-angle unconformity and a thickness of 200 to 350 m [73].
(3)
Upper Jurassic Gaojiping Group (J3gj): continental volcanic rocks, mainly consisted of mafic, intermediate to felsic lavas and clastic rocks overlying the Upper Carboniferous Hutian Group (with a nearly parallel, eruptive unconformity); approximately 30–80 m in thickness.
(4)
Lower Cretaceous Guancaohu Group (K1gn): represented by lacustrine volcano-sedimentary clastic rocks (with purple-red color), overlying the Upper Jurassic Gaojiping Group with an angular unconformity. The strata tilt to the north with a thickness of 150–200 m.
(5)
Quaternary (Q): eluvium, alluvium, and diluvium.
Although there is no distinct folding observed in the mining district, fault structures were well developed owing to the influence of regional tectonics. These deep faults are E–W, NE–SW, and NW–SE trending. Fault F23 (with a dip angle of 75° to 85°) was the main ore-controlling structure for the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit. This large normal fault formed during the Devonian–Carboniferous period, with NW side downthrown and SE side upthrown. The subvertical F23 fault plane was distorted along its strike or dip direction, which is spatially close to the main ore bodies. Additionally, igneous rocks present in this district (including diabase, granite porphyry and minor quartz porphyry) mostly intruded along the three fault sets. The diabases, with a K-Ar age of ~150 Ma [2,3], occur as irregular dykes and commonly cut through the ore bodies (Figure 2a). They are often found in underground workings, but rarely in outcrops. The diabase dykes have an ophitic texture, and are mainly composed of pyroxene and plagioclase. These dykes are prone to alteration, such as carbonatization, chloritization, silicification, and sericitization. Weakly altered reddish, porphyritic granite occurs in the mining area or underground workings. Phenocrysts within the granite porphyry are dominantly potassium feldspar, quartz, and minor biotite and plagioclase. The groundmass is made up of felsic minerals, such as plagioclase, potassium feldspar, and quartz.

2.2. Occurrences and Distribution of Ore Bodies

The ore bodies of the Yushui Cu-polymetallic deposit appear in bedded/stratiform, lenticular and vein-like shapes, containing about 99,000 tons of copper, 182,600 tons of lead, and 333 tons of silver [11]. With a thickness of 0.1–19 m, the ore horizon is situated at the unconformity interface between the limestone of the Upper Carboniferous Hutian Group and the quartz sandstone of the Lower Carboniferous Zhongxin Formation (Figure 2a). The Yushui ores are mainly characterized by massive, disseminated, stockwork and lamellar structures, exhibiting paragenetic, exsolution, metasomatic and/or crushed texture. The ore-mineral assemblages are dominantly composed of bornite, chalcopyrite, chalcocite, galena, sphalerite, and pyrite, with trace amounts of argentite/acanthite, siegenite, and Ag-bearing sulphosalts. Gangue minerals are dominated by quartz, calcite, sericite and chlorite. The main ore bodies consist of three layers, which are described from bottom to top as follows (Figure 2b):
(1)
Ore-bearing tuffaceous sedimentary layer, with a thickness of 5–30 cm. The tuffaceous sedimentary rocks occur interbedded with thin layers of Cu-rich sulphide ores, showing microlaminations. Feldspar and quartz occur as phenoclasts in the tuffaceous layers. This layer unconformably overlies the Carboniferous clastic rocks.
(2)
Bedded/stratiform massive sulphides, with a thickness of 0.1–9.4 m. This layer has the highest Cu grade locally reaching more than 50 wt. %. Silver occurs predominantly in the copper-rich ores and exhibits a positive correlation with Cu grades (but not with Pb or Zn contents) [13]. The grain sizes of sulphide minerals are very fine (mostly less than 0.1 mm), displaying laminated structures. Moreover, flow structures and plastic deformation can also be observed in such laminated layers [2,3,73].
(3)
Hematite–chert layer, closely associated with the massive sulphide ores, 0.1–3.7 m in thickness. It is a mixed sedimentary layer with very fine intercalations of exhalative materials and sediments. The hematite-bearing chert/siliceous mudstone locally occurs with siderite, siltstone, (sandy) dolomite, and more rarely thin-bedded sulphide ore layer. All these geological characteristics mentioned above indicate that the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit has the typical features of a seafloor sedimentary-exhalative deposit [1,15,74,75].
Overall, hydrothermal alteration within the hanging-wall strata is rather weak, with slight silicification as well as Pb-Zn mineralization and pyritization. Comparatively, the footwall alteration is more pervasive, with carbonatization, chloritization, sericitization and Cu-Pb-Zn-(Ag) mineralization. Furthermore, the intensity/degree of alteration gradually decreases from top downwards.

3. Sampling and Analytical Methods

A number of massive sulphide samples were collected from the −100 m level of No. 2 stope in the Yushui deposit (Figure 2a). These typical massive sulphides were formed during the main mineralization stage, and are principally composed of massive bornite ores (including the richest Cu-Ag bonanza), massive chalcopyrite or galena-dominated ores, as well as mixed ores of bornite and chalcopyrite (as shown in Figure 3a–f). Some of the samples contain interpenetrating veins of galena, sphalerite, and calcite. Reflected-light photomicrographs of polished thin sections show that in the Pb-Zn-rich ore samples, colloform or irregular-shaped sphalerite aggregates occur as coarse-grained inclusions enclosed within massive porous galena (Figure 4a); whereas in Cu-rich bonanza ores, anhedral bornite and/or chalcopyrite aggregates commonly occur as intimate intergrowths with sphalerite, pyrite or chalcocite (Figure 4b–e), but most of these Cu-Fe sulphide crystals rarely coexist with disseminated phyllosilicates or other clay minerals. In some cases, minor amounts of sphalerite and bornite are present as fine-grained inclusions disseminated throughout the chalcopyrite matrix (Figure 4f).
By using agate mortar and pestle, selected ore fragments of representative hand specimens (n = 8) were roughly crushed into millimeter-sized granules. To obtain homogeneous microcrystalline groundmass separates, various types of metal sulphides with small diameters (20–60 mesh size fractions), such as bornite, chalcopyrite and galena, were sieved and carefully hand-picked under a binocular microscope at Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University. Helium and argon isotopic compositions of trapped hydrothermal fluids from the Yushui massive sulphide ores (including YS-035, YS-038, YS-040, YS-041, YS-042, and YS-044) were determined with an all-metal extraction line and a GV-5400 noble gas mass spectrometer (GV Instruments, Manchester, UK) at the State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Guiyang). For higher precision, another two samples (YS-008 and YS-020) were further analysed using a Thermo Fisher Helix Split-Flight-Tube (SFT) multi-collector mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Analytical Laboratory of Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology.
Approximately 1 g of coarse-grained (generally 0.25–1.0 mm) hand-picked mineral separates were first cleaned ultrasonically several times in ethyl alcohol, then dried in vacuum and loaded in on-line crusher buckets. In order to facilitate complete removal of volatiles adsorbed on mineral surfaces or trapped in subsurface voids, these samples were baked at ~150 °C in an ultra-high vacuum system for >24 h prior to measurement. Fluid inclusion-hosted volatiles were released from mineral grains into the all-metal extraction system by sequential crushing in modified Nupro-type valves. The extracted gases were exposed to a titanium sponge furnace at 800 °C for 20 min to remove the bulk of active gases (such as CO2 and H2O), and then exposed to two SAES Zr-Al getters (one at room temperature, the other at 450 °C) for 10 min to further purify. He was separated from Ar using an activated charcoal cold finger at liquid N2 temperature (~196 °C) for 40–60 min to trap Ar, then He and Ar isotopes were analyzed using the GV-5400 or Helix SFT with relative errors of <10%. Noble gas abundances were measured by peak-height comparison with known amounts of standard air from an air bottle. Detailed sample preparation procedures and experimental methods used here were similar to those described in references [76,77,78]. The atmospheric 3He/4He and 40Ar/36Ar ratio is ~1.4 × 10−6 and 295.5, respectively [79].
Analyses of (organic) trace gases trapped within fluid inclusions in this study were performed at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (NMT), USA. The cleaned and dried bornite or chalcopyrite samples (~100 mg each) were put into a swift crushing tube while being heated at about 100 °C and pumped at least 8 h (to eliminate secondary fluid inclusions), until a pressure lower than 2 × 10−7 Pa was attained in the gas extraction line. The ore mineral samples were crushed in a vacuum chamber housing the mass spectrometer (Balzers QMS-420, Balzers Instruments, Marin-Epagnier, Switzerland), and the released volatiles were quickly removed by the vacuum pumping system to a Balzers QMS-420 quadrupole mass spectrometer. The analytical precision is usually better than 5%. Most of the tubes for removing trace gases were made of glass, and the time for the removal was very short (less than 1 s), so that the released gases could keep their original compositions. The liquid-N2–condensable gases (including CO2, SO2, H2S, C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, C3H8, C4H8, C4H10, C6H6, and C7H8), non-condensable gases (e.g., H2, He, Ar, CH4, N2, and O2), and water are measured independently. The gas species are determined from an analog display of the mass spectra. Data processing was completed using the QUADSTAR-420 software (Version 3.0, Balzers Instruments, Marin-Epagnier, Switzerland). The experimental procedure was described in more details by previous researchers [48,62,63].

4. Results

4.1. He-Ar Concentrations and Isotopic Ratios

The measured abundances of fluid inclusion-hosted helium and argon in these massive sulphide samples vary over one to two orders of magnitude (as presented in Table 1, 4He: 2.27–160.00 × 10−5 cm3 STP g1; 3He: 0.53–34.88 × 10−12 cm3 STP g−1; 40Ar: 6.28–37.82 × 10−7 cm3 STP g−1; 36Ar: 1.25–10.40 × 10−9 cm3 STP g−1). By comparison, only one chalcopyrite-rich massive sulphide sample (YS-020) collected from the −190 m lower-level ore body contains the highest 3He and 4He concentrations among the remaining tested specimens, and significantly higher than those bornite-dominated samples from the −100 m level ore body. On the contrary, most of the 36Ar and 40Ar contents in bornite aggregates from the richest Cu-bonanza ore body (except YS-041) are generally higher than in chalcopyrite or galena samples. Such variations in noble gas contents may also be attributed to differences in the actual size and population densities of fluid inclusions among various sulphide minerals, or even due to the variation in crushing/degassing efficiency (to a certain extent) [22,32]. Overall, these polymetallic sulphide ores exhibit a narrow range of 3He/4He ratios from 0.006 to 0.056 Ra (~0.026 Ra on average, n = 8); while the 40Ar/36Ar ratios range from 333.76 to 501.68, with an average of 397.53 which is greater than that of air-saturated water (ASW: 295.5) [79]. Moreover, a majority of the Yushui bornite samples have somewhat higher 3He/4He ratios of trapped fluids (~0.036 Ra on average) when compared to the chalcopyrite samples (~0.011 Ra on average). Their calculated 3He/4He ratios are considerably lower than the modern atmospheric end-member value, lying within the range of crustal reservoir [80].

4.2. Trace Gas Analysis of Fluid Inclusions

Inclusion volatiles were measured in bornite and chalcopyrite from the −100 m level of No. 2 stope (main ore bodies) in the Yushui deposit. The abundances of trace gases (such as He, Ar, and N2) in fluid inclusions are presented in Table 2. It appears that the analytical variation in the same crushed sample is quite small. In addition to the determination of conservative gas species N2, Ar, and He in ore-forming fluids, the concentrations and ratios of organic gases were also measured for comparison. Bulk analytical results of fluid inclusions in the Yushui massive sulphide ores are shown in Table 3. These volatile organic compounds are mainly composed of CH4 and CO2, together with C2–C7 (i.e., C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, C3H8, C4H8, C4H10, C6H6, and C7H8). Other than methane, the most abundant hydrocarbons are ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8), n-butane (C4H10), propylene (C3H6) and butane (C4H10). Minor amounts of ethylene (C2H4), butene (C4H8), benzene (C6H6), and toluene (C7H8) were also detected (except for one chalcopyrite sample). By contrast, the concentrations of hydrocarbons larger than C4 were very low, thus can be regarded as negligible. Furthermore, the final freezing temperature and initial melting temperature of CO2 inclusions were somewhat lower than the standard values, suggesting the existence of other trace gases. However, not all of the organic species recorded in mass spectra have been identified and calibrated due to the limitations of testing methods. Hence, the amount of condensable organic compounds has been calculated to date by assuming all are CH4 and C2–C7 light hydrocarbons [48].

5. Discussion

5.1. Helium and Argon Sources

According to previously published results of noble gas isotopes, helium and argon trapped in fluid inclusions generally originate from three main sources: (1) air-saturated water (ASW, including meteoric fluids and groundwater), which is characterized by atmospheric He and Ar isotopic compositions (3He/4He = 1Ra, 40Ar/36Ar = 295.5) [79]; (2) mantle magmatic volatiles, which are produced from most mantle-derived rocks including the oceanic lithosphere characterized by a well-defined 3He/4He ratio of 1–1.3 × 10−5 (7–9 Ra), while mantle-derived Ar is dominated by radiogenic 40Ar with 40Ar/36Ar > 40,000 [81,82,83]; (3) fluids of crustal origin, including formation water or sedimentary basin brines. It has been suggested that high concentrations of large-ion lithophile elements (LILEs, such as U, Th and K) in the continental crust can produce abundant radiogenic/nucleogenic Ar and He, with 40Ar/36Ar ratios ≥ 45,000 and 3He/4He ratios ≤ 0.1 Ra, respectively [80]. In this study, our data indicate that He-Ar isotopic compositions of the Yushui sulphide samples are relatively close to each other (3He/4He: 0.006–0.056 Ra; 40Ar/36Ar: 333.76–501.68). All these 3He/4He and 40Ar/36Ar ratios are well consistent with the range of crust-originated fluids (0.01–0.05 Ra), suggestive of crustal components as the predominant source of noble gases, with little or no contribution from mantle-derived fluids (Figure 5). The proportional contribution of atmospheric He to the ore-forming fluids can also be estimated by calculation of the F4He value (i.e., the ratio of 4He/36Ar in the sample to the atmospheric 4He/36Ar ~0.1655). Overall, the calculated F4He values of the Yushui ore deposit are greater than 24,000 (Table 1). In other words, the 4He content in each sulphide sample was more than 24,000 times that of the atmosphere, implying that seawater and/or meteoric water might play a negligible role in copper-polymetallic mineralization.
In addition, the 40Ar*/4He values of our studied samples vary from 0.0011 to 0.0166, while the 40Ar*/4He value of crustal source (present-day average crustal production ratio) is approximately 0.2 [80]. In contrast, the mantle beneath the crust has a higher 40Ar*/4He value of ~0.5 (where 40Ar* is the non-atmospheric 40Ar contribution) [28,29,80,84]. Notably, a majority of these data plotted in the 40Ar*/4He-R/Ra diagram (Figure 6) are lower than the 40Ar*/4He value of crustal fluids. According to previous researchers, the 40Ar*/4He value of modern groundwater may decrease when groundwater flows through regional rocks, as 4He is preferentially leached and mobilized in comparison with 40Ar [85]. Actually, the concentrations of radiogenic 40Ar and 4He in groundwater (derived from crustal rocks) are related to the closure temperatures of Ar and He. For most minerals, the closure temperature of He is less than 200 °C, while the closure temperature of 40Ar is usually higher than 200 °C. According to previous microthermometric results obtained from the Yushui ore deposit, the homogenization temperatures of fluid inclusions mainly ranged from 110 °C to 220 °C [12], indicating that 4He was preferentially partitioned into the metal-bearing solutions. Therefore, the relatively low values of 40Ar*/4He for the Yushui ore-forming fluids may be resulted from the remobilization and redistribution of highly radioactive 4He from the strata during continuous leaching/hydrothermal reworking processes.
As shown in Figure 6, the 40Ar*/4He ratios of chalcopyrite samples (No. YS-020, YS-035, and YS-044) were much lower than those of bornite and galena samples. Likewise, the 3He/4He ratios of these three samples were also slightly lower than the other five samples. In fact, bulk chemical analyses of trace-element compositions (unpublished data) reveal that the concentrations of large-ion lithophile elements (especially U and REEs) in selected chalcopyrite-rich samples were significantly higher than those in the other bornite-rich ores, and the radiogenic 4He produced from radioactive decay of uranium may have increased the contents of 4He in these U-rich samples and thus led to a decrease of the 40Ar*/4He ratios. On the other hand, extremely high contents of total REEs in such chalcopyrite samples (ΣREE up to >20,000 ppm) are positively correlated with the enrichment of U (Figure 7), indicating that these elements were probably accumulated in the same period and controlled by similar geological factors. Based on the preliminary results of geochemical analyses and optical microscopic observations, we suggest that some of the Yushui ore bodies might be locally affected by late-stage hydrothermal reworking and alteration. As a result, those sulphide samples with elevated U and REE concentrations have yielded somewhat anomalous He-Ar isotopic ratios in their fluid inclusions. Nevertheless, the other Cu-rich bonanza samples from the Yushui main ore bodies were not superimposed by strong metamorphic overprinting (only weakly affected). Therefore, these results may represent the initial He-Ar isotope compositions of ore-forming fluids. The mixture of crustal reservoir can impart distinct He-Ar isotopic signatures to the hydrothermal products during Cu-mineralization processes in the Yushui deposit, as demonstrated by the lowest F4He values measured in those bornite-rich samples with relatively higher 40Ar*/4He ratios close to that of the crustal production (~0.2) [84].

5.2. The N2–Ar–He Systematics

Some authors have proposed that the compositions of trace gases (such as N2, Ar, and He) in geothermal systems can be used to determine the ratios among magmatic water, crustal fluids and meteoric water in hydrothermal solutions [56,57,58]. As shown in the N2/100–Ar–He × 10 (NAH) ternary diagram (Figure 8), the trace gas ratios associated with distinct sources/reservoirs are markedly different. The basic principle is as follows: the N2/Ar ratio in the modern atmosphere is around 83.6, but the N2/Ar ratio of ASW (including seawater) is somewhat lower (~38) since the solubility of Ar in water is higher than that of N2. The meteoric water is plotted near label Ar in Figure 8 because it is enriched in Ar. During plate subduction, a large amount of marine sediments were carried to the deep crust. Decomposition of organic matters in subducted sediments might have released a large amount of N2, which makes the mantle-derived magmatic water plotted near label N2/100 in Figure 8 (Zone A), with N2/Ar ratios higher than 200 because of its richness in N2. As mentioned above, helium (especially 4He) is mostly derived from the decay of radioactive elements. Due to high contents of U and Th in the continental crust, crustal water (enriched in helium) is plotted near label He×10 (Zone B). It has also been suggested that the magmatic water from rift basalts or rhyolites partly overlaps the field of crustal water in this NAH diagram (Zone C), but their corresponding different 3He/4He ratios could be used to distinguish them [51,52,54,56,57,58].
The compositions of trace gases in sulphide inclusions of the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit are listed in Table 2. The results of N2, Ar, and He in replicate samples were in good agreement, with a small range of variability. This may suggest that the analytical method is reliable, and the (trapped) gas/fluid ratios are quite stable in fluid inclusions. Hence, boiling is not the major mechanism for metal deposition, which may cause great variation of gas/fluid ratios [49,51]. In the NAH diagram, we find that most of the analytical data are plotted in Zone B and Zone C, representing the source ranges of formation water (sedimentary hot brines) and/or fluids from rift-related basalt/rhyolite, respectively. Combined with the He-Ar isotopic tracers, we can rule out the possibility that the ore-forming fluids were derived from ASW/meteoric water and/or deep magmatic water associated with continental rift basalt/rhyolite. Obviously, the N2-Ar-He systematics are generally consistent with previous integrated studies of He-Ar isotopes, thus can provide more geochemical evidence to support the crustal origin of Yushui ore-forming fluids (mainly derived from formation water/basinal brines). However, it should be noted that several chalcopyrite samples show a systematic increase in He/N2 ratios towards magmatic end-member value, possibly suggestive of an insignificant mixing trend between crustal and mantle components during fluid evolution and hydrothermal alteration processes.

5.3. Compositions of Light Hydrocarbon Gases

Ore-forming fluids of sediment-hosted, stratabound massive sulphide deposits, especially formation water or sedimentary basinal brines, usually contain a large amount of organic matters. The organic matters are principally composed of light hydrocarbon gases because most of liquid hydrocarbons are unstable at (medium to high) ore-forming temperatures [60]. It has been proposed that light hydrocarbons in crustal fluids were mainly generated by thermal cracking of kerogens caused by interactions between crustal fluids and organic matters in sedimentary rocks [57,58,59]. Here, two end-member components have been recognized in these light hydrocarbon gases. One component (called the “natural gas type” for short) was generated in the interaction of crustal fluids with sedimentary rocks at medium-low temperatures. Its composition is predominantly made up of a sequence of saturated hydrocarbon species decreasing steadily from CH4 to higher saturated alkanes. The ratios of CH4/C2H6 and C2H6/C3H8 are about 50–350 and 2.5, respectively; while the contents of unsaturated olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons are very low. Such features are very similar to those of natural gases. The other component (called the “magmatic volatile type” for short) was produced by fluid–rock interactions at high temperatures (>400 °C) during magmatic intrusion, consisting essentially of CH4 with rapidly decreasing contents of higher species of saturated alkanes. The ratios of CH4/C2H6 and C2H6/C3H8 are higher than 1000 and about 10, respectively, along with (easily measurable) high concentrations of unsaturated alkenes and aromatic hydrocarbons. The reason for this is that high-temperature conditions favor the formation of short-chain alkanes and unsaturated alkenes [57,59,62,63].
As presented in Table 3, the CH4/C2H6 ratios for the Yushui ore-forming fluids are about 10–80, while the C2H6/C3H8 ratios are mostly less than 3. In addition, the concentrations of unsaturated alkenes/olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons are very low. Thus, the light hydrocarbon organic gases in our tested specimens obviously belong to the so-called “natural gas type”. The results in Figure 9 also demonstrate that almost all of these analytical data are plotted in the field of “natural gas type”, implying that the light hydrocarbon gases in ore-forming fluids of the Yushui deposit (especially for Ag-rich bornite samples) were probably generated by thermal cracking of kerogens caused by fluid-rock interactions at medium-low temperatures. On the other hand, an increase in CO2/CH4 ratios is generally correlated with decreasing 40Ar*/4He values in fluid inclusions (following the paragenetic sequence from bornite to chalcopyrite, accompanied by progressive low-grade regional metamorphism). Nevertheless, the main-stage Cu-Ag mineralization processes (which had occurred before the Yanshanian magmatism) seem not to have been strongly affected by later-stage, high-temperature magmatic activities. In fact, the intrusion of Mesozoic diabase dykes or granitoids in the mining area might not have a direct relationship with the Yushui main ore bodies. This geological phenomenon is also consistent with our conclusions.
However, it must be emphasized that this classification diagram for the CO2–CH4–C2H6 ternary system could only be established/used semi-quantitatively. Thermodynamic modelling indicates that fluid inclusions containing CO2 and significant amounts of CH4 will re-equilibrate and precipitate graphite during cooling, thus resulting in post-entrapment compositional changes [86]. Noteworthily, the dashed lines in Figure 9 only roughly mark the ambiguous boundaries of “evolved magmatic” or “composite fluid” fields. Generally speaking, the typical volatiles associated with magmatic activity are characterized by CO2 and only minor CH4 [53,66]. Although the characteristic carbon-bearing volcanic vapor is considered to be CO2, reports on the presence of hydrocarbons in igneous rocks (formed by abiogenic processes) have actually increased in recent years. Most of the occurrences are due to the incorporation of organic materials into the magmatic systems [87]. For example, fluid inclusions in minerals from alkaline igneous complexes contain distinctly different carbon-bearing volatiles, which are dominated by hydrocarbon-rich gases (essentially CH4) with only insignificant amounts of CO2 [88]. Therefore, these hydrocarbons may not be as rare as previously thought. Moreover, the domain “A” also covers almost all the field of metamorphic fluids, and thus may not always represent magmatic volatiles or volcanic vapors in its totality. In some cases, evolved meteoric waters, metamorphic or deep-sea hydrothermal vent fluids with elevated CO2/CH4 ratios may also be plotted in the upper part of this ternary diagram (close to label CO2) [89,90,91]. So it is necessary to combine the composition of organic gases in fluid inclusions with the N2-Ar-He tracing systematics. Here, we introduce a CO2/CH4 vs. N2/Ar diagram to unambiguously identify fluid sources [92]. Overall, the CO2/CH4 ratios of crustal fluids are usually below 4 [53,66]. Note that the variation range of bornite samples in Figure 10 generally falls within the domain of organic-rich formation waters. As for chalcopyrite samples, data presented in Table 2 give N2/Ar ratios in the general range of ~266 to 4849, whereas corresponding CO2/CH4 ratios vary from ~60 to 102. Most of these analytical results plotted outside the crustal box (near or within the domain of composite fluid, see Figure 10) are obviously distinct from those of bornite-rich samples (N2/Ar: ~100–395; CO2/CH4: 0.52–1.54), and thus can be explained in terms of mixing between magmatic fluids and a crustal component (i.e., formation waters/basinal brines), but only to a limited degree.

5.4. Possible Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbons to CO2

Besides chalcopyrite, a recent study [12] also reveals the presence of abundant CO2-rich fluid inclusions, together with aqueous inclusions in both opaque and transparent minerals (including sphalerite, quartz, and calcite) from the Yushui ore deposit. In contrast to the hydrocarbon-rich fluid inclusions within bornite samples, it should be noted that such CO2-rich fluids are uncharacteristic of basinal brines, but somewhat comparable to those of orogenic or magmatic mineralization systems [90,91]. Typically, hydrocarbon fluids are important parts of basinal hydrothermal settings. Sulphur speciation and concentrations in deep basinal brines play a crucial role in the formation of many sediment-hosted polymetallic sulphide deposits [93]. In particular, one of the most important reactions controlling the sulphur behavior in deep sedimentary environments is the abiogenic reduction of sulphate to sulphide (occurring at temperature above 100–140 °C) coupled with the oxidation of hydrocarbons, which is termed thermochemical sulphatet reduction (TSR) [94,95,96]. Thus, the TSR process involving hydrocarbons may contribute significantly to the genesis of both MVT and SEDEX ore deposits [97,98,99]. Moreover, it has been suggested that siliceous limestones commonly experience insignificant decarbonation/decomposition of carbonates under contact metamorphic conditions; whereas for most sedimentary rocks enriched in organic matter, CH4 rather than CO2 will be released [100]. Therefore, infiltration of external, hot fluids into the host strata might increase the CH4 generation from devolatilization reactions (or partially by removal of organic carbon from the host rocks). However, this is clearly not the case with the Yushui fluids trapped in chalcopyrite.
To explain this, we propose that late-stage hydrothermal alteration caused by oxidized ore-bearing solutions that penetrated into the Caledonian basement might result in an oxidation effect of soluble organic gases and materials (i.e., methane or other light hydrocarbons), which is manifested by elevated CO2/CH4 ratios and secondary enrichment of U-REE in most chalcopyrite-rich samples (Figure 7), as well as a decrease in the content of saturated hydrocarbons (see Table 3). Theoretically, methane can be oxidized to carbon dioxide (CH4 + 2O2 = CO2 + 2H2O) via two distinct geological processes: (1) AOM reaction (anaerobic oxidation of methane) mediated by sulphate-reducing bacteria in an anoxic environment, and (2) TOM (thermochemical oxidation of methane) at relatively high temperatures by sulphate or high-valence metal oxides. Both processes typically result in the formation of authigenic carbonate. Although it is difficult to distinguish between thermochemical and bacterial sulphate reduction (BSR) in sediment-hosted base metal deposits, S-isotope ratios of sulphide products and fluid inclusion data can be used as distinguishing criteria, and provide geochemical evidence for identification of a bacterial versus a thermochemical origin [95,96]. Previously, we have already investigated the sulphur isotopic signatures of various ore minerals to infer the sources of paleo-hydrothermal fluids. Unpublished isotopic data produced by bulk analyses of hand-picked mineral separates show a narrow range of δ34S values varying from −4.9 to 1.5 per mil (δ34SBornite: −4.9–−0.5‰V-CDT, with an average of −3.4‰; δ34SChalcopyrite: −4.3–−1.2‰V-CDT, with an average of −3.1‰; δ34SGalena: −2.7–−1.7‰V-CDT, with an average of −2.2‰; δ34SPyrite: −3.1–1.5‰V-CDT, with an average of −0.6‰). All these results are comparable to the majority of typical SEDEX and MVT deposits, where the reduced sulphur was interpreted to be mainly derived from TSR [95,96].
Moreover, organic gas reservoirs in sedimentary basins are generally buried to depths of several kilometers experiencing temperatures from 60 to 150 °C [101], while the metabolism of archaea/sulphate-reducing bacteria responsible for AOM are mainly active at temperatures below 80 °C (i.e., dominating the conversion of CH4 to CO2 only under limited conditions). During prograde metamorphism, methane directly formed by cracking of higher hydrocarbons under elevated temperature will become increasingly enriched in 13C as a result [102]. Although there are no carbon-isotope data available for the CH4 or carbonate (e.g., calcite/dolomite cements) associated with the Yushui ore bodies, anaerobic oxidation of methane by bacteria or archaea can also be ruled out on the basis of our microthermometric measurements, because the estimated homogenization temperatures (about 120–190 °C) of fluid inclusions in sphalerite and transparent minerals from the main metallogenic stage would have been too high for sulphate-reducing bacteria to survive [96]. Furthermore, mixing and contamination by oxidised methane during the extraction is also considered unlikely because of the rapidity of sample handling and experimental procedures. Hence, TSR is potentially the predominant mechanism for hydrocarbon oxidation in the strata with high formation temperature (especially > 80 °C). Recently, geological evidence has been reported for the oxidation of CH4 induced by high-valence metal oxides or by Fe3+ in detrital biotite (chloritization) at temperatures above 270 °C during metamorphism [101,103,104], but this needs to be further confirmed. In sum, methane in early-formed Cu-rich sulphide assemblages was mainly derived from cracking of the precursor hydrocarbons. At increasing metamorphic conditions under more oxidizing conditions, an unusual depletion of methane in main-stage high-temperature chalcopyrite samples can be explained by the oxidation of hydrocarbons to CO2 and H2O. This is supported by the contemporaneous increase of CO2 contents in the trapped volatiles (locally produced by TSR during the later hydrothermal reworking and alteration).

5.5. Constraints on the Genesis of Yushui Ore Deposit

It can be concluded that the compositions of fluid inclusions in most Cu-rich sulphide samples may represent fluid features of the principal ore-forming stage. Analyses of their He-Ar isotopic ratios and trace gas characteristics indicate that main sources of the Yushui ore-forming fluids were derived from basinal hot brines (crustal formation water) in the host strata rather than magmatic input or shallow-/deep-circulating seawater, even though fluids for the Nanling metallogenic belt are generally considered to have been sourced (substantially) from seawater by convection [1]. Previous studies have suggested that cations dissolved in the liquid phase of fluid inclusions hosted by the main-stage ore-mineral assemblages (such as bornite and chalcopyrite) are predominantly composed of Ca2+ and Na+, followed by K+ and Mg2+; while the identified anion species were mainly SO42 and Cl, followed by F. The Na+/K+ ratios ranged from 1.29 to 30.78, and the F/Cl ratios varied from 0.016 to 1 [8]. It is generally thought that the Na+/K+ ratio in magmatic hydrothermal fluids is less than 1, and greater than 1 in metamorphic or pegmatite deposits; whereas higher values will be observed in ore-forming fluids associated with sedimentary rocks or underground hot brines [105]. Some authors also found that magmatic hydrothermal fluids are commonly rich in F, while hydrothermal fluids (such as underground hot brines from primary sedimentary basins) have low F/Cl ratios (usually less than 1) [106]. Therefore, the Na+/K+ and F/Cl ratios in the liquid phase of sulphide inclusions [8] also indicate that ore-forming fluids of the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit should be derived from sedimentary hot brines (formation water), but have little genetic relationship with the later stage magmatism and/or relevant hydrothermal event (except for a number of chalcopyrite samples).
Disputable direct dating of the bornite-dominated assemblage has been recently discussed in the literature. Our isotopic data yielded a Re-Os isochron age of 308 ± 15 Ma, which is interpreted to represent the age of ore deposition for these Cu-rich massive sulphides [11]. Thus, the formation of the Yushui ore bodies, especially the main stage of Cu-Ag mineralization, is coeval with the host rocks. Previously published results reported an initial 187Os/188Os ratio of 1.81 ± 0.34 for the Yushui polymetallic sulphide deposit, with the γOs(t) value up to +1349, suggesting a major contribution of crustal materials to ore-forming processes [11]. According to ore-bearing properties in this district [107], high concentrations of copper, lead, zinc and silver were detected in the surrounding strata formed in the Predevonian era (the Caledonian basement), which might provide an important source of ore-forming materials. Combined with the geological features of the Yushui deposit, it is proposed that the mining area was affected by the Hercynian tectonic activities, resulting in regional extension. This event led to an increase in the geothermal gradient within this area, which might have produced basinal hot brines/formation water in the Caledonian tectonic layer. Abundant ore-forming elements were also leached and transported by the fluids over the same period. Subsequently, paleo-hydrothermal fluids migrated along the deep dilational faults, carried the metals upwards, and formed the massive sulphide ore bodies. The penetration-circulation of basinal brines (deep downward) into the basement rocks may be a main driving mechanism for extraction of base metals and silver [108]. In summary, the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit may be of sedimentary exhalative origin.

6. Conclusions

(1) The 3He/4He ratios (0.006–0.056 Ra) and 40Ar/36Ar values (333.76–501.68) of fluid inclusions in massive sulphides from the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit are well within the range of crustal reservoir, thus indicating that the main-stage Cu-rich solutions may be predominantly derived from crustal fluids without the mixing of mantle fluids or seawater. To a lesser extent, the ore-forming fluids may have inherited the radiogenic He isotopic signatures from the surrounding strata. As a result, the 40Ar*/4He values of most chalcopyrite samples were generally lower than those of bornite-rich samples, suggesting that the main ore bodies might be locally influenced by later stage hydrothermal reworking and alteration.
(2) Combined with He-Ar isotopic tracers, the compositions of trace gases (N2–Ar–He systematics) in Ag-rich bornite crystals also indicate that such metal-bearing solutions probably originated from formation water (basinal hot brines), rather than magmatic water or circulating meteoric water. In addition, a variety of light hydrocarbon species identified in the Yushui fluid inclusions provide additional constraints on the origin of ore-forming fluids.
(3) The organic gases in the ore-forming fluids of the Yushui deposit are mainly composed of C1–C4 alkanes, while the contents of unsaturated olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons were very low, indicating that the processes of copper-polymetallic mineralization were not directly affected by high-temperature magmatism. As hydrothermal alteration proceeded, CO2 and H2O trapped within fluid inclusions may have formed by the breakdown and oxidation of organic matter.

Author Contributions

Y.H. and X.S. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.H. and Z.W. analyzed the data and wrote this paper; Z.W., X.S., and W.Z. have substantially revised the original manuscript; G.S. and Y.H. provided great support for sampling during our field work; Y.W. contributed materials/analysis tools; Y.H., Z.W., and Y.G. also made significant contributions to the sample preparation.

Funding

This research project was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41602092, 41702066, 41503036 and 41273054), Open Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering (No. 201505 and GDKLMRCE1805), Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, Ministry of Land and Resources (No. KLMMR-2015-B-04), Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2011), the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (No. 12lgjc05), and the China Ocean Mineral Resources Research and Development Association (DYXM-115-02-1-11).

Acknowledgments

We thank Guohao Jiang from Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Guiyang) and Hanbin Liu at the Analytical Laboratory of Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology for their assistance with He-Ar analyses. We particularly want to pay tribute to David Norman, a well-respected and distinguished geologist who dedicated his whole life to the research career of ore-forming fluid geochemistry. The corresponding author also gratefully acknowledges Andrew Campbell and Beverly Chomiak for their technical help during his visit in NMT. Last but not least, the authors sincerely appreciate for the editors’ warm help and great patience, as well as three anonymous reviewers’ thoughtful comments and constructive suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gu, L.; Zaw, K.; Hu, W.; Zhang, K.; Ni, P.; He, J.; Xu, Y.; Lu, J.; Lin, C. Distinctive features of Late Palaeozoic massive sulphide deposits in South China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2007, 31, 107–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, Y. Metallogenic-geologic characteristics of Yushui hydrothermal-sedimentary polymetallic deposit in Meixian County, Guangdong Province. Guangdong Geol. 1990, 5, 1–13. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, B.; Chen, J.; Guo, R.; Yu, S. The genesis of Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit in Meixian County, Guangdong Province. Guangdong Geol. 1992, 7, 59–69. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. He, Y. Geology of Yushui copper-lead-zinc (silver) deposit, Meixian. Guangdong Geol. 1997, 12, 41–48. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, L.; Yang, M.; Peng, S. On the genesis of the Yushui polymetallic deposit in Meixian County, Guangdong Province. Geotecton. Metall. 1999, 23, 345–352. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, H. A study on the isotopic geochemical exploration in the Yushui-Yinshi copper and polymetallic mineralization belt, Guangdong. Acta Geosci. Sin. 1994, 15, 152–156. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai, J.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, Q. Metallogenetic epoch of Yushui copper polymetallic deposit of Meixian, Guangdong. Guangdong Geol. 1996, 11, 55–58. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, J. Thermobarogeochemistry, ore-forming age and genesis study for the Yushui copper-rich multimetal deposit in Meixian County, Guangdong Province, southern China. Geol. Miner. Resour. South China 1997, 1, 37–50. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Guo, R.; Chen, B.; Yu, S. Mineralogy of the Yushui Cu-polymetallic deposit in Meixian, Guangdong. Geol. Explor. Nonferrous Met. 1999, 8, 428–431. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, W. The ore-forming geology condition and origin of Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit. Nonferrous Met. 2007, 59, 18–19. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang, Y.; Sun, X.; Shi, G.; Sa, R.; Guan, Y.; Jiang, X.; Que, H. Re-Os dating of sulphides from the Yushui Cu-polymetallic deposit in eastern Guangdong Province, South China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 70, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, B.; Zhu, X.; Cheng, X.; Wang, H. Characteristics and geological significance of fluid inclusions in the Yushui copper polymetallic deposit, Guangdong Province. Geol. China 2016, 43, 2163–2172. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. He, Y. Silver in Yushui copper-lead-zinc deposit, Meixian. Guangdong Geol. 1997, 12, 33–36. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, X. Copper resources in China: Today and tomorrow. Northwest. Geol. 2007, 40, 83–88. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Gu, L.; Hu, W.; Ni, P.; He, J.; Xu, Y.; Lu, J.; Lin, C.; Li, W. New discussion on the South China-type massive sulphide deposits formed on continental crust. Geol. J. China Univ. 2003, 9, 592–608. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Lupton, J.E.; Craig, H. A major helium-3 source at 15°S on the East Pacific Rise. Science 1981, 214, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Simmons, S.F.; Sawkins, F.J.; Schlutter, D.J. Mantle-derived helium in two Peruvian hydrothermal ore deposits. Nature 1987, 329, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lupton, J.E.; Baker, E.T.; Massoth, G.J. Variable 3He/heat ratios in submarine hydrothermal systems: Evidence from two plumes over the Juan de Fuca ridge. Nature 1989, 337, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baker, E.T.; Lupton, J.E. Changes in submarine hydrothermal 3He/heat ratios as an indicator of magmatic/tectonic activity. Nature 1990, 346, 556–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stuart, F.M.; Turner, G.; Duckworth, R.C.; Fallick, A.E. Helium isotopes as tracers of trapped hydrothermal fluids in ocean-floor sulfides. Geology 1994, 22, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stuart, F.M.; Burnard, P.G.; Taylor, R.P.; Turner, G. Resolving mantle and crustal contributions to ancient hydrothermal fluids: He-Ar isotopes in fluid inclusions from Dae Hwa W-Mo mineralization, South Korea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 4663–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jean-Baptiste, P.; Fouquet, Y. Abundance and isotopic composition of helium in hydrothermal sulfides from the East Pacific Rise at 13°N. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, R.; Burnard, P.G.; Turner, G.; Bi, X. Helium and argon isotope systematics in fluid inclusions of Machangqing copper deposit in west Yunnan Province, China. Chem. Geol. 1998, 146, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Burnard, P.G.; Hu, R.; Turner, G.; Bi, X. Mantle, crustal and atmospheric noble gases in Ailaoshan gold deposits, Yunnan Province, China. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1999, 63, 1595–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hou, Z.; Li, Y.; Ai, Y.; Tang, S.; Zhang, Q. Helium isotopic compositions of the active hydrothermal system in the Okinawa trough: Evidence for the mantle-derived helium. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 1999, 29, 155–162. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Winckler, G.; Aeschbach-Hertig, W.; Kipfer, R.; Botz, R.; Rübel, A.P.; Bayer, R.; Stoffers, P. Constraint on origin and evolution of Red Sea brines from helium and argon isotopes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2001, 184, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zeng, Z.; Qin, Y.; Zhai, S. He, Ne and Ar isotope compositions of fluid inclusions in hydrothermal sulfides from the TAG hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2001, 44, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ballentine, C.J.; Burnard, P.G. Production, release and transport of noble gases in the continental crust. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2002, 47, 481–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Graham, D.W. Noble gas isotope geochemistry of Mid-Ocean Ridge and Ocean Island Basalts: Characterization of mantle source reservoirs. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2002, 47, 247–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hou, Z.; Zaw, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Tetsuro, U. Contribution of magmatic fluid to the active hydrothermal system in the JADE field, Okinawa Trough: Evidence from fluid inclusions, oxygen and helium isotopes. Int. Geol. Rev. 2005, 47, 420–437. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lüders, V.; Niedermann, S. Helium isotope composition of fluid inclusions hosted in massive sulfides from modern submarine hydrothermal systems. Econ. Geol. 2010, 105, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zeng, Z.; Niedermann, S.; Chen, S.; Wang, X.; Li, Z. Noble gases in sulfide deposits of modern deep-sea hydrothermal systems: Implications for heat fluxes and hydrothermal fluid processes. Chem. Geol. 2015, 409, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Guan, Y.; Ren, Y.; Sun, X.; Xiao, Z.; Guo, Z. Helium and argon isotopes in the Fe-Mn polymetallic crusts and nodules from the South China Sea: Constraints on their genetic sources and origins. Minerals 2018, 8, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Sun, X.; Deng, X.; Guan, Y.; Xu, L.; Huang, Y.; Cao, K. He-Ar-S isotopic compositions of polymetallic sulphides from hydrothermal vent fields along the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge and their geological implications. Minerals 2018, 8, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stuart, F.M.; Turner, G. The abundance and isotopic composition of the noble gases in ancient fluids. Chem. Geol. 1992, 101, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, R.; Turner, G.; Burnard, P.G.; Zhong, H.; Ye, Z.; Bi, X. Helium and argon isotopic geochemistry of Jinding superlarge Pb-Zn deposit. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 1998, 41, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kendrick, M.A.; Burgess, R.; Pattrick, R.A.D.; Turner, G. Fluid inclusion noble gas and halogen evidence on the origin of Cu-Porphyry mineralising fluids. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2001, 65, 2651–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kendrick, M.A.; Burgess, R.; Leach, D.; Pattrick, R.A.D. Hydrothermal fluid origins in Mississippi valley-type ore districts: combined noble gas (He, Ar, Kr) and halogen (Cl, Br, I) analysis of fluid inclusions from the Illinois-Kentucky fluorspar district, Viburnum Trend, and Tri-State districts, midcontinent United States. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 453–469. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kendrick, M.A.; Burgess, R.; Pattrick, R.A.D.; Turner, G. Hydrothermal fluid origins in a fluorite-rich Mississippi valley-type district: combined noble gas (He, Ar, Kr) and halogen (Cl, Br, I) analysis of fluid inclusions from the South Pennine ore field, United Kingdom. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 435–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kendrick, M.A.; Burgess, R.; Harrison, D.; Bjørlykke, A. Noble gas and halogen evidence for the origin of Scandinavian sandstone-hosted Pb-Zn deposits. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, K.; Jiang, S.; Xiao, H.; Ni, P. Origin of ore-forming fluids of the Dachang Sn-polymetallic ore deposit: Evidence from helium isotopes. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2002, 47, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xue, C.; Chen, Y.; Wang, D.; Yang, J.; Yang, W.; Zeng, R. Geology and isotopic composition of helium, neon, xenon and metallogenic age of the Jinding and Baiyangping ore deposits, northwest Yunnan, China. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2003, 46, 789–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, R.; Burnard, P.G.; Bi, X.; Zhou, M.; Peng, J.; Su, W.; Wu, K. Helium and argon isotope geochemistry of alkaline intrusion-associated gold and copper deposits along the Red River-Jinshajiang fault belt, SW China. Chem. Geol. 2004, 203, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, X.; Wang, M.; Xue, T.; Ma, M.; Li, Y. He-Ar isotopic systematics of fluid inclusions in pyrites from PGE-polymetallic deposits in Lower Cambrian black rock series, South China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2004, 78, 471–475. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xiong, D.; Sun, W.; Shi, G.; Zhai, W.; Wang, S. Crust and mantle contributions to gold-forming process at the Daping deposit, Ailaoshan gold belt, Yunnan, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2009, 36, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhai, W.; Sun, X.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hua, R.; Ye, X. He-Ar isotope geochemistry of the Yaoling-Meiziwo tungsten deposit, North Guangdong Province: Constraints on Yanshanian crust-mantle interaction and metallogenesis in SE China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, 1150–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yang, F.; Li, Q.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Z. A combined fluid inclusion and S-H-O-He-Ar isotope study of the Devonian Ashele VMS-type copper-zinc deposit in the Altay orogenic belt, northwest China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2018, 161, 139–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Norman, D.I.; Sawkins, I.J. Analysis of volatiles in fluid inclusions by mass spectrometer. Chem. Geol. 1987, 61, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Norman, D.I.; Musgrave, J.A. N2-Ar-He compositions in fluid inclusions: Indicators of fluid source. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Graney, J.R.; Kesler, S.E. Factors affecting gas analysis of inclusion fluid by quadrupole mass spectrometry. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 3977–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, X.; Norman, D.I.; Sun, K.; Chen, B.; Chen, J. N2-Ar-He systematics and source of ore-forming fluid in Changkeng Au-Ag deposit, central Guangdong, China. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 1999, 42, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, X.; Norman, D.I.; Sun, K.; Chen, J.; Chen, B. A new indicator of ore-forming fluid sources: N2-Ar-He compositions in fluid inclusions. Geol. Rev. 2000, 46, 99–104. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  53. Moore, J.N.; Norman, D.I.; Kennedy, B.M. Fluid inclusion gas compositions from an active magmatic-hydrothermal system: A case study of the Geysers geothermal field, USA. Chem. Geol. 2001, 173, 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, X.; Norman, D.I.; Sun, K.; Chen, J.; Chen, B. N2-Ar-He tracing systematics of ore-forming fluids: A case study from the Songxi large-scale Ag (Sb) deposit, eastern Guangdong Province, China. Prog. Nat. Sci. 1999, 9, 1364–1367. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  55. Sun, X.; Wang, M.; Xue, T.; Sun, K. New advances in research of trace gaseous compositions in fluid inclusions and their applications as indicators of ore-forming fluid sources and processes. Earth Sci. Front. 2004, 11, 471–478. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  56. Giggenbach, W.F.; Sano, Y.; Wakita, H. Isotopic composition of helium, and CO2 and CH4 contents in gases produced along the New Zealand part of a convergent plate boundary. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 3427–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Giggenbach, W.F.; Sheppard, D.S.; Robinson, B.W.; Stewart, M.K.; Lyon, G.L. Geochemical structure and position of the Waiotapu geothermal field, New Zealand. Geothermics 1994, 23, 599–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Giggenbach, W.F. Variations in the chemical and isotopic composition of fluids discharged from the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1995, 68, 89–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Giggenbach, W.F. Relative importance of thermodynamic and kinetic processes in governing the chemical and isotopic composition of carbon gases in high-heatflow sedimentary basins. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1997, 61, 3763–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhuang, H.; Lu, J.; Fu, J.; Liu, J.; Shi, J. Preliminary study on light hydrocarbons in ore-forming fluids of gold and antimony deposits in southwestern Guizhou, China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 1997, 42, 1708–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sun, X.; Norman, D.I.; Sun, K.; Chen, B.; Chen, J. Compositions of light hydrocarbons in fluid inclusions and its significance for ore genesis—A case study of Songxi Ag (Sb) deposit, eastern Guangdong. Geol. Rev. 1999, 45, 817–821. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  62. Sun, X.; Norman, D.I.; Sun, K.; Chen, B.; Chen, J. Organic gases in fluid inclusions of ore minerals and their constraints on ore genesis: A case study of the Changkeng Au-Ag deposit, Guangdong, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2003, 77, 86–94. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sun, X.; Norman, D.I.; Sun, K.; Wang, M.; Chen, B.; Chen, J.; Yu, S. Light hydrocarbons in fluid inclusions and their constraints on ore genesis: A case study of the Songxi Ag (Sb) deposit, Eastern Guangdong, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2003, 77, 227–236. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kendrick, M.A.; Honda, M.; Oliver, N.H.S.; Phillips, D. The noble gas systematics of late-orogenic H2O–CO2 fluids, Mt Isa, Australia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2011, 75, 1428–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kendrick, M.A.; Honda, M.; Walshe, J.; Petersen, K. Fluid sources and the role of abiogenic-CH4 in Archean gold mineralization: Constraints from noble gases and halogens. Precambrian Res. 2011, 189, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Blamey, N.J.F. Composition and evolution of crustal, geothermal and hydrothermal fluids interpreted using quantitative fluid inclusion gas analysis. J. Geochem. Explor. 2012, 116–117, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cawood, P.A.; Zhao, G.; Yao, J.; Wang, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y. Reconstructing South China in Phanerozoic and Precambrian supercontinents. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2018, 186, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shu, L. Predevonian tectonic evolution of South China: From Cathaysian Block to Caledonian period folded orogenic belt. Geol. J. China Univ. 2006, 12, 418–431. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  69. Li, S.; Zhao, S.; Liu, X.; Cao, H.; Yu, S.; Li, X.; Somerville, I.; Yu, S.; Suo, Y. Closure of the Proto-Tethys Ocean and Early Paleozoic amalgamation of microcontinental blocks in East Asia. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2018, 186, 37–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, G.; Wang, Y.; Huang, B.; Dong, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, G.; Yu, S. Geological reconstructions of the East Asian blocks: From the breakup of Rodinia to the assembly of Pangea. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2018, 186, 262–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Z.; Li, X.; Wartho, J.A.; Clark, C.; Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Bao, C. Magmatic and metamorphic events during the early Paleozoic Wuyi-Yunkai orogeny, southeastern South China: New age constraints and pressure-temperature conditions. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2010, 122, 772–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guo, R.; Peng, E. Regional geological background, ore-forming characters and metallogeny of Songxi silver deposit, east Guagndong. Geotect. Metall. 2009, 33, 567–572. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  73. Chen, Y.; Liang, B.; Liao, L. Major characteristics of carboniferous sedimentary facies of Yushui-Yinshi district in Meixian County, Guangdong Province. Guangdong Geol. 1992, 7, 27–39. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  74. Leach, D.L.; Sangster, D.F.; Kelley, K.D.; Large, R.R.; Garven, G.; Allen, C.R.; Gutzmer, J.; Walters, S. Sediment-hosted lead-zinc deposits: A global perspective. Econ. Geol. 2005, 100, 561–607. [Google Scholar]
  75. Leach, D.L.; Bradley, D.C.; Huston, D.; Pisarevsky, S.A.; Taylor, R.D.; Gardoll, S.J. Sediment-hosted lead-zinc deposits in Earth History. Econ. Geol. 2010, 105, 593–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hu, R.; Bi, X.; Jiang, G.; Chen, H.; Peng, J.; Qi, Y.; Wu, L.; Wei, W. Mantle-derived noble gases in ore-forming fluids of the granite-related Yaogangxian tungsten deposit, Southeastern China. Miner. Depos. 2012, 47, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, J.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Jin, G.; Zhang, J.; Han, J. Helium isotope composition of inclusions in mineral grains using Helix SFT noble gas mass spectrometer. Acta Geol. Sin. 2015, 89, 1826–1831. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  78. Xie, G.; Mao, J.; Li, W.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, H.; Jia, G.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Different proportion of mantle-derived noble gases in the Cu-Fe and Fe skarn deposits: He-Ar isotopic constraint in the Edong district, Eastern China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 72, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Allègre, C.J.; Staudacher, T.; Sarda, P. Rare gas systematics: Formation of the atmosphere, evolution and structure of the earth’s mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1987, 81, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Andrews, J.N. The isotopic composition of radiogenic helium and its use to study groundwater movement in confined aquifers. Chem. Geol. 1985, 49, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Patterson, D.B.; Honda, M.; McDougall, I. Noble gases in mafic phenocrysts and xenoliths from New Zealand. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58, 4411–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dunai, T.J.; Baur, H. Helium, neon and argon systematics of the European subcontinental mantle: Implications for its geochemical evolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 2767–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Reid, M.R.; Graham, D.W. Resolving lithospheric and sub-lithospheric contributions to helium isotope variations in basalts from the southwestern US. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1996, 144, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ballentine, C.J.; Burgess, R.; Marty, B. Tracing fluid origin, transport and interaction in the crust. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2002, 47, 539–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Torgersen, T.; Kennedy, B.M.; Hiyagon, H.; Chiou, K.Y.; Reynolds, J.H.; Clarke, W.B. Argon accumulation and the crustal degassing flux of 40Ar in the Great Artesian Basin, Australia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1989, 92, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Huizenga, J.-M. Thermodynamic modelling of C–O–H fluids. Lithos 2001, 55, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Potter, J.; Konnerup-Madsen, J. A review of the occurrence and origin of abiogenic hydrocarbons in igneous rocks. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 2003, 214, 151–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Konnerup-Madsen, J.; Rose-Hansen, J. Volatiles associated with alkaline igneous rift activity: Fluid inclusions in the Ilímaussaq Intrusion and the Gardar granitic complexes (south Greenland). Chem. Geol. 1982, 37, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hou, Z.; Zhang, Q. CO2-Hydrocarbon fluids of the Jade hydrothermal field in the Okinawa Trough: Fluid inclusion evidence. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 1998, 41, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wilkinson, J.J. Fluid inclusions in hydrothermal ore deposits. Lithos 2001, 55, 229–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kesler, S.E. Ore-forming fluids. Elements 2005, 1, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Norman, D.I.; Moore, J.N. Methane and excess N2 and Ar in geothermal fluid inclusions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 25–27 January 1999. [Google Scholar]
  93. Barré, G.; Truche, L.; Bazarkina, E.F.; Michels, R.; Dubessy, J. First evidence of the trisulfur radical ion S3 and other sulfur polymers in natural fluid inclusions. Chem. Geol. 2017, 462, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Goldstein, T.P.; Aizenshtat, Z. Thermochemical sulfate reduction: A review. J. Therm. Anal. 1994, 42, 241–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Machel, H.G.; Krouse, H.R.; Sassen, R. Products and distinguishing criteria of bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction. Appl. Geochem. 1995, 10, 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Machel, H.G. Bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction in diagenetic settings—Old and new insights. Sediment. Geol. 2001, 140, 143–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Basuki, N.; Taylor, B.E.; Spooner, E.T.C. Sulfur isotope evidence for thermochemical reduction of dissolved sulfate in Mississippi Valley-type zinc-lead mineralization, Bongara Area, Northern Peru. Econ. Geol. 2008, 103, 783–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Thom, J.; Anderson, G.M. The role of thermochemical sulfate reduction in the origin of Mississippi Valley-type deposits. I. Experimental results. Geofluids 2008, 8, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gadd, M.G.; Layton-Matthews, D.; Peter, J.M.; Paradis, S.; Jonasson, I.R. The world-class Howard’s Pass SEDEX Zn-Pb district, Selwyn Basin, Yukon. Part II: the roles of thermochemical and bacterial sulfate reduction in metal fixation. Miner. Depos. 2017, 52, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kerrick, D.M.; Connolly, J.A.D. Metamorphic devolatilization of subducted marine sediments and the transport of volatiles into the Earth’s mantle. Nature 2010, 411, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hu, W.; Kang, X.; Cao, J.; Wang, X.; Fu, B.; Wu, H. Thermochemical oxidation of methane induced by high-valence metal oxides in a sedimentary basin. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, Q.Y.; Worden, R.H.; Jin, Z.J.; Liu, W.H.; Li, J.; Gao, B.; Zhang, D.W.; Hu, A.P.; Yang, C. TSR versus non-TSR processes and their impact on gas geochemistry and carbon stable isotopes in Carboniferous, Permian and Lower Triassic marine carbonate gas reservoirs in the Eastern Sichuan Basin, China. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 100, 96–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tarantola, A.; Mullis, J.; Vennemann, T.; Dubessy, J.; de Capitani, C. Oxidation of methane at the CH4/H2O–(CO2) transition zone in the external part of the Central Alps, Switzerland: Evidence from stable isotope investigations. Chem. Geol. 2007, 237, 329–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tarantola, A.; Mullis, J.; Guillaume, D.; Dubessy, J.; de Capitani, C.; Abdelmoula, M. Oxidation of CH4 to CO2 and H2O by chloritization of detrital biotite at 270 ± 5 °C in the external part of the Central Alps, Switzerland. Lithos 2009, 112, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lu, H.; Liu, C. Formation of strata-bound ore deposits in China: Studies on fluid inclusions. Chin. J. Geochem. 1990, 9, 347–360. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  106. Roedder, E. Fluid inclusions. Rev. Mineral. 1984, 12, 1–644. [Google Scholar]
  107. Cai, J.; Liu, J. Characteristics of structures and prospecting targets in the metallogenic province at the south sector of Yongmei depression, Guangdong. Geotect. Metall. 1996, 20, 333–339. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  108. Essarraj, S.; Boiron, M.-C.; Cathelineau, M.; Tarantola, A.; Leisen, M.; Boulvais, P.; Maacha, L. Basinal brines at the origin of the Imiter Ag-Hg deposit (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): Evidence from LA-ICP-MS data on fluid inclusions, halogen signatures, and stable isotopes (H, C, O). Econ. Geol. 2016, 111, 1753–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic geological maps of the Yushui copper-polymetallic massive sulphide deposit in Meixian County, Guangdong Province. (A) Location map of the Yushui ore deposit in the middle section of the Yong’an–Meixian depression zone (modified after [2]). Inset shows regional setting of the study area in the Nanling Region, South China; (B) Regional stratigraphy of the Yushui mining district (modified after [2], data sources from No. 723 Geological Prospecting Team and the local mining company). Note that the deeply concealed ore bodies are hosted in the sedimentary strata of Upper Carboniferous Hutian Group and Lower Carboniferous Zhongxin Formation (not marked on this map).
Figure 1. Schematic geological maps of the Yushui copper-polymetallic massive sulphide deposit in Meixian County, Guangdong Province. (A) Location map of the Yushui ore deposit in the middle section of the Yong’an–Meixian depression zone (modified after [2]). Inset shows regional setting of the study area in the Nanling Region, South China; (B) Regional stratigraphy of the Yushui mining district (modified after [2], data sources from No. 723 Geological Prospecting Team and the local mining company). Note that the deeply concealed ore bodies are hosted in the sedimentary strata of Upper Carboniferous Hutian Group and Lower Carboniferous Zhongxin Formation (not marked on this map).
Minerals 09 00258 g001
Figure 2. Geological profiles of the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit (a) Cross section of ore-bearing sector along No. 0 exploratory line; (b) columnar section of No. ZK2-4 drillhole (modified after [1,10]). Note that the locations of No. 0 exploratory line and No. ZK2-4 drillhole are both marked in the map of regional stratigraphy shown above (Figure 1B).
Figure 2. Geological profiles of the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit (a) Cross section of ore-bearing sector along No. 0 exploratory line; (b) columnar section of No. ZK2-4 drillhole (modified after [1,10]). Note that the locations of No. 0 exploratory line and No. ZK2-4 drillhole are both marked in the map of regional stratigraphy shown above (Figure 1B).
Minerals 09 00258 g002
Figure 3. Photographs of selected hand specimens from the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit. (a) Typical Pb-Zn-rich massive sulphide ore samples; (bf) typical Cu-(Ag)-rich massive sulphide ore samples.
Figure 3. Photographs of selected hand specimens from the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit. (a) Typical Pb-Zn-rich massive sulphide ore samples; (bf) typical Cu-(Ag)-rich massive sulphide ore samples.
Minerals 09 00258 g003
Figure 4. Representative reflected-light photomicrographs of selected polished thin sections from the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit. (a) Colloform or irregular-shaped sphalerite aggregates occur as coarse-grained inclusions enclosed in massive porous galena (YS-008); (b) anhedral chalcopyrite aggregates coexisting with bornite, sphalerite and fine-grained pyrite (YS-020); (c,d) anhedral chalcopyrite crystals and trace amounts of galena or sulphosalts mostly occur as micro-inclusions disseminated in bornite matrix (YS-038 and YS-040); (e) anhedral to subhedral Ag-bearing chalcocite inclusions hosted in massive bornite aggregates (YS-041); (f) tiny bornite and sphalerite grains distributed in massive porous chalcopyrite matrix (YS-044). Mineral abbreviations: Bn = bornite, Cc = chalcocite, Ccp = chalcopyrite, Gn = galena, Py = pyrite, Sp = sphalerite.
Figure 4. Representative reflected-light photomicrographs of selected polished thin sections from the Yushui copper-polymetallic deposit. (a) Colloform or irregular-shaped sphalerite aggregates occur as coarse-grained inclusions enclosed in massive porous galena (YS-008); (b) anhedral chalcopyrite aggregates coexisting with bornite, sphalerite and fine-grained pyrite (YS-020); (c,d) anhedral chalcopyrite crystals and trace amounts of galena or sulphosalts mostly occur as micro-inclusions disseminated in bornite matrix (YS-038 and YS-040); (e) anhedral to subhedral Ag-bearing chalcocite inclusions hosted in massive bornite aggregates (YS-041); (f) tiny bornite and sphalerite grains distributed in massive porous chalcopyrite matrix (YS-044). Mineral abbreviations: Bn = bornite, Cc = chalcocite, Ccp = chalcopyrite, Gn = galena, Py = pyrite, Sp = sphalerite.
Minerals 09 00258 g004
Figure 5. 40Ar/36Ar versus R/Ra diagram of fluid inclusions hosted within massive sulphide samples from the Yushui Cu-polymetallic ore deposit. Plots of data points from representative Porphyry-Cu ore systems, Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) and sandstone-type (SST) Pb-Zn deposits are also shown for comparison, given by [37,38,39,40].
Figure 5. 40Ar/36Ar versus R/Ra diagram of fluid inclusions hosted within massive sulphide samples from the Yushui Cu-polymetallic ore deposit. Plots of data points from representative Porphyry-Cu ore systems, Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) and sandstone-type (SST) Pb-Zn deposits are also shown for comparison, given by [37,38,39,40].
Minerals 09 00258 g005
Figure 6. 40Ar*/4He versus R/Ra diagram of fluid inclusions hosted within massive sulphide samples from the Yushui Cu-polymetallic ore deposit (modified after [84]). Data sources from the previously published literature [37,38,39] and this study.
Figure 6. 40Ar*/4He versus R/Ra diagram of fluid inclusions hosted within massive sulphide samples from the Yushui Cu-polymetallic ore deposit (modified after [84]). Data sources from the previously published literature [37,38,39] and this study.
Minerals 09 00258 g006
Figure 7. Scatter plots of total rare earth elements (REEs) versus U concentrations (ppm) in different types of the Yushui sulphide samples. Note that there is a strong positive correlation between these two elements, along with the variation trend of decreasing 40Ar*/4He ratios during copper-polymetallic mineralisation.
Figure 7. Scatter plots of total rare earth elements (REEs) versus U concentrations (ppm) in different types of the Yushui sulphide samples. Note that there is a strong positive correlation between these two elements, along with the variation trend of decreasing 40Ar*/4He ratios during copper-polymetallic mineralisation.
Minerals 09 00258 g007
Figure 8. N2/100-Ar-He × 10 ternary diagram of ore-forming fluids in the Yushui deposit (modified after [49]). Zone A: magmatic water; Zone B: formation water (sedimentary brines); Zone C: fluid from rift basalt/rhyolite; Zone D: deep-circulating meteoric water; Zone E: shallow-circulating meteoric water, including seawater/air saturated water (ASW). “×”: chalcopyrite samples; “○”: bornite samples from the bonanza ore body.
Figure 8. N2/100-Ar-He × 10 ternary diagram of ore-forming fluids in the Yushui deposit (modified after [49]). Zone A: magmatic water; Zone B: formation water (sedimentary brines); Zone C: fluid from rift basalt/rhyolite; Zone D: deep-circulating meteoric water; Zone E: shallow-circulating meteoric water, including seawater/air saturated water (ASW). “×”: chalcopyrite samples; “○”: bornite samples from the bonanza ore body.
Minerals 09 00258 g008
Figure 9. CH4-CO2-C2H6 × 100 ternary diagram of fluid inclusions in massive sulphides from the Yushui copper polymetallic ore deposit (modified after the published literature [55,57,62]). A: “magmatic/metamorphic volatile type” field; B: “natural gas type” field; “×”: chalcopyrite samples; “○”: bornite samples from the Cu-rich bonanza ore body.
Figure 9. CH4-CO2-C2H6 × 100 ternary diagram of fluid inclusions in massive sulphides from the Yushui copper polymetallic ore deposit (modified after the published literature [55,57,62]). A: “magmatic/metamorphic volatile type” field; B: “natural gas type” field; “×”: chalcopyrite samples; “○”: bornite samples from the Cu-rich bonanza ore body.
Minerals 09 00258 g009
Figure 10. Compilation of CO2/CH4 versus N2/Ar data for Cu-rich sulphides from the Yushui ore deposit (modified after the published literature [55,66,92]).
Figure 10. Compilation of CO2/CH4 versus N2/Ar data for Cu-rich sulphides from the Yushui ore deposit (modified after the published literature [55,66,92]).
Minerals 09 00258 g010
Table 1. He-Ar concentrations (cm3 STP g−1) and isotopic compositions of fluid inclusions hosted in massive sulphides from the Yushui ore deposit.
Table 1. He-Ar concentrations (cm3 STP g−1) and isotopic compositions of fluid inclusions hosted in massive sulphides from the Yushui ore deposit.
Sample No.YS-035YS-038YS-040YS-041YS-042YS-044YS-008YS-020
MineralsChalcopyriteBorniteBorniteBorniteBorniteChalcopyriteGalenaChalcopyrite
3He (10−12)1.99 ± 0.262.66 ± 0.081.66 ± 0.050.53 ± 0.044.06 ± 0.162.98 ± 0.182.0134.88
4He (10−5)22.41 ± 0.343.43 ± 0.054.27 ± 0.072.27 ± 0.037.07 ± 0.1120.80 ± 0.324.80160.00
40Ar (10−7)6.28 ± 0.0427.63 ± 0.1637.34 ± 0.228.57 ± 0.0537.82 ± 0.2220.23 ± 0.1213.9612.96
36Ar (10−9)1.25 ± 0.038.25 ± 0.0610.40 ± 0.061.97 ± 0.038.82 ± 0.126.06 ± 0.073.623.22
3He/4He (Ra)0.006 ± 0.0010.056 ± 0.0020.028 ± 0.0010.017 ± 0.0010.041 ± 0.0020.010 ± 0.0010.0300.016
40Ar/36Ar501.68 ± 12.32334.87 ± 3.02359.06 ± 3.06434.28 ± 7.88428.62 ± 6.23333.76 ± 4.12385.70402.30
40Ar*/4He0.00120.00950.01550.01210.01660.00110.00680.0002
F4He1,081,36525,14924,79369,40748,398207,39480,1493,000,697
Notes: 1. All errors are quoted at the 1σ confidence level; 2. The unit for 3He, 4He, 36Ar, and 40Ar is cm3 STP g−1; 3. 40Ar* = 40Arsample × [1 − (40Ar/36Ar)atmosphere/(40Ar/36Ar)sample]; 4. F4He values reflect enrichment of 4He in the fluids relative to air, F4He = (4He/36Ar)sample/(4He/36Ar)atmosphere where 4He/36Aratmosphere = 0.1655 [37]; 5. Except for two samples (No. YS-008 and YS-020) which were analyzed in the Analytical Laboratory of Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, the other samples were measured in the State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Guiyang).
Table 2. N2, Ar and He contents (mol. %) in sulphide-hosted fluid inclusions from the Yushui deposit.
Table 2. N2, Ar and He contents (mol. %) in sulphide-hosted fluid inclusions from the Yushui deposit.
MineralDescriptionCrush No.N2ArHeN2/ArAr/He
borniteHand-picked separates of fine-grained aggregates from the Cu bonanza ores10.37820.00140.0461270.10.030
20.0405<0.00010.0054--
30.0302<0.00010.0098--
40.48060.00480.0519100.10.092
50.0280<0.00010.0087--
60.03950.00010.0065395.00.015
chalcopyriteHand-picked separates of fine-grained aggregates from massive sulphide ores11.45480.00030.01644849.30.018
20.95370.00030.00883179.00.034
30.80760.00030.00732692.00.041
41.98520.00070.02372836.00.030
50.40370.00040.01271009.30.031
60.19170.00040.0084479.30.048
70.24210.00030.0096807.00.031
80.14150.00030.0084471.70.036
90.07970.00030.0078265.70.038
Table 3. Light hydrocarbons and CO2 contents (mol. %) in sulphide-hosted fluid inclusions from the Yushui Cu-rich ore samples.
Table 3. Light hydrocarbons and CO2 contents (mol. %) in sulphide-hosted fluid inclusions from the Yushui Cu-rich ore samples.
Sampling LocationSelected from Some of the Richest Bonanza Ore Bodies at the −100 m Level of No. 2 Stope in the Yushui Copper-Polymetallic DepositSelected from Typical Stratiform Massive Sulphide Ore Bodies at the −100 m Level of No. 2 Stope in the Yushui Deposit
MineralHand-Picked Separates of Fine-Grained Bornite AggregatesHand-Picked Separates of Fine-Grained Chalcopyrite Aggregates
Crush No.123456123456
CH455.3138.8547.5363.4347.4238.911.2041.6381.0731.2591.2660.968
C2H40.2920.2110.2180.288<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
C2H61.0490.4970.7861.2750.8701.1140.0930.1010.0900.0930.0920.082
C3H60.1040.0640.1040.0660.0570.0410.0640.0630.0620.0620.0650.052
C3H80.7500.4510.6190.7870.3300.4410.1420.1500.1320.1380.1500.128
C4H80.2090.0620.1280.2750.0260.0860.0030.0050.0050.0040.0030.004
C4H100.3410.0940.2180.4670.0330.1090.0020.0020.0030.0030.0020.003
C6H60.1420.0650.1050.1640.0140.0100.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.001
C7H80.0320.0090.0200.0490.0010.002<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
CO241.7759.7050.2733.2051.2559.2998.4998.0498.6498.4498.4298.76
CO2/CH40.761.541.060.521.081.5281.7859.8691.9278.2177.73102.00
CH4/C2H652.7278.2360.4649.7554.4834.9212.9916.2311.9813.5213.7611.81
C2H6/C3H81.401.101.271.622.642.520.650.670.680.670.610.64

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Shi, G.; Zhai, W.; Guan, Y. He-Ar Isotopes and Trace Gas Compositions of Fluid Inclusions in Massive Sulphides from the Yushui Copper-Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Metallogenic Implications. Minerals 2019, 9, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9050258

AMA Style

Huang Y, Wu Z, Sun X, Wang Y, Shi G, Zhai W, Guan Y. He-Ar Isotopes and Trace Gas Compositions of Fluid Inclusions in Massive Sulphides from the Yushui Copper-Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Metallogenic Implications. Minerals. 2019; 9(5):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9050258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yi, Zhongwei Wu, Xiaoming Sun, Yan Wang, Guiyong Shi, Wei Zhai, and Yao Guan. 2019. "He-Ar Isotopes and Trace Gas Compositions of Fluid Inclusions in Massive Sulphides from the Yushui Copper-Polymetallic Deposit, South China: Metallogenic Implications" Minerals 9, no. 5: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9050258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop