Kaymaz (Eskişehir, Türkiye) Gold Deposit: The Role of Granite and Tectonism on Gold Mineralization in Listvenite Rock

Gold-enriched silica-listvenite rock from the Kaymaz Gold Deposit (KGD) was investigated to determine the effect of regional tectonism and Eocene granite intrusion on gold mineralization. The questions “is granite a heat–fluid source or a lithologic barrier?” and “how does regional tectonism affect gold mineralization?” remain unclear. This study aims to clarify these questions via field studies, core sample observations, petrography, ore microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), XRD, and fluid inclusion analyses; these methods were applied to samples collected from four different sites within the KGD (1—Damdamca, 2—Karakaya, 3—Mermerlik, and 4—Kızılağıl). The highest-grade gold mineralization is present in the listvenite rock in the fault-controlled contact zone between serpentinite and granite, whereas granite hosts minor gold and silver enrichments near the contact. The orientations of contacts are compatible with the NW-SE-trending Eskişehir fault zone in Karakaya and the NE-SW-trending tear faults in Damdamca. Listvenite is silica-rich and has high iron oxy-hydroxide content, while granite is argilized and silicified along the contact with listvenite. Native gold grains were found between the quartz minerals of listvenite and granite. The adsorption of gold by goethite ± lepidocrocite has been observed in the listvenite samples of Mermerlik. Chromite, Ni-sulfide minerals, pyrite, arsenopyrite, galena, native silver, acanthite, iodargyrite, and goethite ± lepidocrocite are the other detected ore minerals. Secondary Cr-Fe-Mn oxide minerals were detected in a granite sample via SEM analyses. The data indicates that listvenitization-causing fluid partially remobilized these metals along with Au and reprecipitated them in the granite during mineralization. The homogenization temperatures (Th) (°C) of fluid inclusions vary between 116 and 393 °C, and the Th (°C) distribution indicates multi-phase mineralization. The Th (°C) values of listvenite and silicified granite are quite similar, which indicates that the same hydrothermal fluid circulated in both lithologies. The low salinity values (1.2–5.4%) indicate that the hydrothermal fluid was derived predominantly from meteoric water. The liquid–vapor ratios of inclusions and quartz textures indicate non-boiling conditions. Gold enrichment in the KGD developed in relation to the circulation of hydrothermal fluids along the faults. The KGD shows typical fluid inclusions, alteration properties, and mineral paragenesis of low-sulfidation-type epithermal deposits. Our study data indicates that meteoric water-rich hydrothermal fluid circulated along the fault zones, dissolved Au and other related elements from the serpentinite, and reprecipitated in the listvenite-altered granite. Granite acts as an impermeable barrier, leading to the circulation of hydrothermal fluids through the contact. Supergene activities affect the mineralization in both Mermerlik and Kızılağıl. No evidence indicating the magmatic origin of gold mineralization was observed.