Next Article in Journal
The Role of Reduced Surface Sulfur Species in the Removal of Se(VI) by Sulfidized Nano Zero-Valent Iron
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Li2O and Spodumene by FTIR-PLS in Pegmatitic Samples for Process Control
 
 
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genesis and Formation Age of Albitite (Breccia) in the Eastern Segment of Qinling Orogen: Constraints from Accessory Mineral U–Pb Dating and Geochemistry

1
State Key Laboratory of Continental Evolution and Early Life, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
2
Shaanxi Mining Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2026, 16(1), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/min16010067
Submission received: 18 December 2025 / Revised: 4 January 2026 / Accepted: 6 January 2026 / Published: 8 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)

Abstract

There exists an east–west trending albitite (breccia) zone, approximately 400 km in length, closely related to gold mineralization, in Devonian strata in the South Qinling tectonic belt. The genesis and formation age of these albitite (breccia) are of great significance for understanding gold enrichment mechanisms and guiding future exploration. Past studies have mainly focused on the Fengxian–Taibai area in the western segment of the albitite (breccia) zone, whereas the eastern segment remains significantly understudied. In this study, a systematic field investigation, as well as petrology, geochemistry, and accessory-mineral geochronology studies were conducted on albitites and albitite breccias in the Shangnan area, the eastern segment of the albitite (breccia) zone. The results show that the albitites are interlayered with or occur as lenses within Devonian clastic rocks. The albitite breccias are mostly enclosed in albitite and Devonian strata, and the clasts within are subangular, uniform in type, and exhibit minimal displacement. Both albitites and albitite breccias exhibit similar trace-element characteristics and detrital zircon age spectra to those of Devonian clastic rocks. Abundant hydrothermal monazites with U–Pb ages ranging from 260 to 252 Ma are present in both albitites and albitite breccias but absent in Devonian clastic rocks. Collectively, these results indicate that the albitites in the Shangnan area are of hydrothermal metasomatic origin, while the albitite breccias record hydraulic fracturing and cementation, and both are products of the same fluid activity event in the Late Permian. We propose that albitite (breccia) zones in the South Qinling tectonic belt were formed under distinct tectonic settings during different evolution stages of the Late Paleozoic Mianlüe Ocean. Specifically, the albitites (breccias) in the Shangnan area are products of thorough metasomatism, local fracturing, and cementation of Devonian clastic rocks by mixed fluids, which ascended along the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault coeval with the emplacement of magmatic rocks related to subduction of the Mianlüe Ocean. In contrast, the albitite breccias in the Fengxian–Taibai area are the result of fluid activity during the transition from regional compression to extension after the closure of the Mianlüe Ocean.

1. Introduction

Albitite is a specific type of rock mainly composed of albite (usually >50 vol.%). It can form through crystallization from Na-rich magmas or residual magma that has undergone a high degree of differentiation, and can also be produced via hydrothermal sedimentation, hydrothermal metasomatism, and medium-to high-grade metamorphism [1,2,3,4,5,6]. It is commonly developed in the margins of alkaline and intermediate-acidic intrusions, hydrothermally active areas, and the metamorphic basements of cratons. Albitite breccia, frequently associated with albitite, is characterized by clasts primarily consisting of albitite. Albitite and albitite breccia related to magmatic–hydrothermal activity are often associated with rare, precious, and radioactive mineral resources such as rare earth elements (REEs), niobium, tantalum, gold, and uranium [1,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Therefore, they have good mineralization prospects and are of great significance for geological exploration and ore prospecting.
The Devonian System in the South Qinling tectonic belt (SQTB) is the main ore-bearing rock series of the non-ferrous and precious metal metallogenic belts in the Qinling Orogenic Belt (QOB), central China. Numerous large-scale Pb-Zn and Au deposits have been discovered in it so far, including the Changba, Yinmusi, and Bafangshan Pb-Zn deposits, as well as the Shuangwang, Ertaizi, and Sanguanmiao gold deposits [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The Devonian strata in the SQTB is mainly a set of clastic–carbonate sedimentary formations, within which albitite (breccia) (short for albitite and albitite breccia) closely associated with gold is developed. These albitites (breccias) are distributed in the Devonian–Lower Carboniferous strata along both sides of the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault, forming an albitite breccia zone with a length of approximately 400 km. In this zone, albitites (breccias) are best-exposed in the Fengxian–Taibai area (western segment) and Shangnan area (eastern segment). The discovery of the Shuangwang “albitite breccia-type gold deposit” in the Fengxian–Taibai area in the 1970s triggered a wave of attention and research on albitites, especially the albitite breccias closely associated with mineralization. Currently, most researchers suggest that the albitites in the Fengxian–Taibai area are products of either Devonian syngenetic hydrothermal sedimentation or late hydrothermal metasomatism [12,13,21,22], while albitite breccia results from the modification of albitites by tectono-magmatic–hydrothermal activities during the Late Triassic (ca. 220–214 Ma; [11,12,13,22,23,24]). The Shangnan area, located in the eastern segment of the SQTB, is another concentrated distribution area of albitite (breccia) in the QOB. Different types of albitite and albitite breccia occur in this area. In recent years, with the discovery of a series of gold deposits and occurrences in or nearby albitite (breccia), such as the Sanguanmiao gold deposit, the genesis of albitite and albitite breccia in the Shangnan area has gradually attracted attention. Some researchers have proposed that the albitites are formed by sodic magma crystallization and contemporaneous metasomatism of Devonian clastic rock, whereas the albitite breccias are the results of hydrothermal explosion during magma emplacement [19,25]. However, there are multiple viewpoints regarding their formation age, including the Late Devonian (ca. 365 Ma; [25]) and the Early Permian (ca. 280 Ma; [19]). So what is the genesis of the albitites and albitite breccias in the Shangnan area? Were they formed contemporaneously with those in the Fengxian–Taibai area? Does the albitite (breccia) zone in the SQTB have the same origin and is it formed concurrently under the same geological setting? The answers to these questions are of great significance for understanding the genesis of the albitite (breccia) zone in the SQTB and guiding subsequent mineral exploration.
In this paper, we conducted systematic field geological surveys, TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA) scanning, and geochemistry, as well as zircon and monazite U–Pb dating on albitites, albitite breccias, and their host clastic rocks in the Shangnan area. The results show that the albitites are formed by pervasive hydrothermal metasomatism, whereas the albitite breccias resulted from intense fluid-driven hydraulic fracturing and brecciation. Both of them are products of Late Permian (ca. 265–252 Ma) hydrothermal fluid activity probably triggered by arc magmatism associated with northward subduction of the Mianlüe Ocean. The albitite (breccia) zone in the SQTB was formed under distinct tectonic settings during different evolution stages of the Mianlüe Ocean evolution.

2. Geological Setting

The east–west trending QOB in central China is a composite orogenic belt that resulted from multiple episodes of subduction, accretion, and collision between the North China Block, Yangtze Block, and intervening microcontinents [26,27]. It can be subdivided into four major tectonic units from north to south: the southern margin of the North China Block, the North Qinling tectonic belt, the South Qinling tectonic belt (SQTB), and the northern margin of the Yangtze Block, which are separated by the Luonan–Luanchuan–Fangcheng Fault, Shangdan Suture Zone, Mianlüe Suture Zone, and Mianlüe–Bashan–Xiangguang Fault, respectively (Figure 1a).
The SQTB is a micro-block that rifted from the Yangtze Block during the expansion of the Mianlüe Ocean (a branch of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean) and re-amalgamated with the Yangtze Block after the closure of the Mianlüe Ocean in the Late Triassic (ca. 227–210 Ma; [27,29]). It comprises a Precambrian crystalline basement overlain by a Neoproterozoic–Mesozoic sedimentary cover sequence. The crystalline basement consists of the Neoarchean Douling Group, the Neoproterozoic Wudang Group, and the Yaolinghe Group. The Douling Group predominantly consists of TTG (tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite) gneiss, amphibolite, quartzite, and schist [30,31,32]. The Wudang Group comprises a thick metavolcano-sedimentary succession characterized by mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks in the lower part, overlain by intermediate to felsic volcanic rocks in the upper part [33]. The Yaolinghe Group is dominated by greenschist-facies metabasaltic volcanic rocks, with subordinate intermediate to felsic metavolcanics and metapelites interlayers [34]. The sedimentary cover comprises Ediacaran carbonates, Cambrian–Ordovician limestones, Silurian shales, Devonian–Carboniferous clastic rocks, and Late Permian–Early Triassic clastic rocks [26]. The Devonian strata of the southern belt occupies the region south of the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault and north of the Ankang Fault. The stratigraphic sequence is subdivided into the Xichahe, Gongguan, Shijiagou, Dafenggou, Gudaoling, Xinghongpu, and Jiuliping Formations from bottom to top. The Xichahe Formation consists predominantly of diamictite, sandstone, and siltstone. The Gongguan Formation consists of dolomite in the lower part and calcarenite and argillaceous rocks in the upper part. The Shijiagou Formation comprises argillaceous carbonates and siltstones interbedded with dolomite. The Dafenggou Formation is dominated by carbonates and sandstones. The Gudaoling Formation is represented by polygenetic conglomerate and pebbly lithic sandstone at the base, overlain by sandstone and carbonate. The Xinghongpu Formation is mainly phyllites, sandstones, and slates intercalated with limestones. The Jiuliping Formation is dominated by graywacke, fine siltstone, and slate, with minor sandy marl interlayers [35,36].
Albitite and albitite breccia occur discontinuously as layered, vein-like, or irregular bodies in the Devonian strata near the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault, forming an E–W trending albitite (breccia) zone about 400 km long, and they are well-developed in the Fengxian–Taibai area in the west and Shangnan area in the east. Albitite breccias are intimately associated with large-scale gold deposits, such as the Shuangwang gold deposit in the western segment, the Ertaizi copper–gold deposit in the middle segment, and the Sanguanmiao gold deposit in the eastern segment, forming an important ore-controlling zone. Since the albitite breccia in the Taibai area is the direct ore-host rock, previous researchers have conducted extensive studies on the albitite and albitite breccia in this area. Based on phenomena such as the interlayered occurrence of albitite and siltstone of the Xinghongpu Formation with straight-boundary, sedimentary structures including parallel and cross-bedding, and the similar rare earth element (REE) distribution patterns of albite to Devonian seawater, some scholars propose that the albitite in the Taibai area has a syngenetic hydrothermal sedimentary origin [13,21]. However, some scholars have proposed that albitite is the complete metasomatism product of siltstone by late-stage hydrothermal fluids, based on the observation that some albitites cut through the siltstone of the Xinghongpu Formation at a low angle [12,22]. Albitite breccia occurs as several lenticular bodies with obvious zonation. The core of the lenses contains clasts of diverse lithologies, of variable sizes, and predominantly subrounded. Towards the outer parts, the clasts are gradually dominated by country rock, with increasing size, angular shape, and showing a jigsaw-fit breccia structure. Therefore, most scholars hold the view that albitite breccia is formed via hydrothermal explosion or fluid-induced hydraulic fracturing [11,13,22,23,24]. The hydrothermal monazite in the cement of albitite breccia yielded a U–Pb age of 220.9 ± 1.8 Ma [24], which is consistent with the timing of widespread syn- to post-collisional magmatic activity in the SQTB, indicating that the albitite breccia in the Taibai area is likely a product of magmatic–hydrothermal activities during the transition from collisional compression to post-orogenic extension after the closure of the Mianlüe Ocean [11,37].
The albitite and albitite breccia in the Shangnan area are also known as “Dangjiang albitite”, and current research on their genesis remains insufficient. Li et al. [25] argued that the albitite has either a sharp intrusive or gradational metasomatic relationship with the surrounding Devonian clastic rocks, forming a dome structure. Additionally, Rb-Sr dating results of seven samples showed good linear correlations and yielded a well-defined isochron age of 364.9 ± 10.9 Ma. Therefore, they proposed that the albitites and albitite breccias in the Shangnan area are products of crystallization of sodic magma emplaced in the Late Devonian, which triggered metasomatism and hydrothermal explosion on surrounding rocks. Wang [19] proposes that the quartz albitite is of magmatic crystallization origin, while the remaining albitites resulted from the metasomatism of country rocks by magmatic fluids, and the albitite breccias are formed by hydrothermal explosion during magma decompression. However, he infers that these rocks may formed in the Early Permian (ca. 280 Ma) based on the youngest zircon ages obtained from albitite breccia.

3. Sample Description

Albitites and albitite breccias in the Shangnan area occur predominantly as lenticular, stratoid, or irregular bodies within the Xinghongpu and Jiuliping formations on the southern side of the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault. The long axes of the lenticular bodies are generally parallel to the regional structure lineament (Figure 1b). In this study, systematic field investigation was carried out in the Xiwan, Liushuwan, and Boyugou sections, where albitites and albitite breccias are intensively exposed (Figure 1b). The result shows that there are five main rock types in this area, including silty phyllite, Na-altered phyllite, dolomite albitite, quartz albitite, and albitite breccia.
Quartz albitite is a hard rock that exhibits a light-yellow color. In the Liushuwan section, quartz albitite occurs as medium- to thick-bedded (20–50 cm) stratoid bodies, intercalated with several thin layers (3–5 cm) of grayish-black silty phyllite (Figure 2a). In the Boyugou section, quartz albitite occurs as lenticular blocks. The core of the lenses consists of relatively pure quartz albitite (Figure 2b), with minor residual silty phyllite locally visible, and the rocks in outer parts of the lenses gradually transition into light-yellow to pale red Na-altered silty phyllite and bluish-gray silty phyllite (Figure 2c). In addition, in areas with intense deformation, quartz albitite can also be observed as small lensoid bodies or as intercalated bands in silty phyllite, which gradually pinch out or transition into Na-altered phyllite or grayish-black phyllite (Figure 2d).
Dolomite albitite occurs as light-yellow- to yellow-brown-colored thick-bedded layers interbedded with silty phyllite. The contact between the two lithologies is gradually transitional. Adjacent to the contacts, abundant grayish-black silty phyllite remnants and brownish-yellow Na-altered phyllite bands parallel to the bedding are present in the dolomite albitite layer, and these relics gradually disappear towards the interior of the layer (Figure 2e). A laminated structure characterized by alternating light-yellow and yellowish-brown laminae develops in the middle part of the dolomite albitite layer. The laminae are 0.5 to 2 cm thick, with clear and straight boundaries between them (Figure 2f). Numerous fractures that penetrate into the dolomite albitite are present in the grayish-black silty phyllite layer. The silty phyllite on both side of the fractures undergoes varying degrees of Na-alteration along the schistosity, resulting in the formation of brownish-yellow Na-altered phyllite (Figure 2g) and even dolomite albitite in the center of wide fractures (Figure 2f).
Albitite breccia is small in scale and mostly occurs in the marginal parts of albitite lenses. It is light-yellow in color, and contains 30 to 60 vol.% clasts, which are angular to subangular in shape and lithologically consistent with the surrounding rock. The clasts are mainly quartz albitite and dolomite albitite fragments in the albitite breccia adjacent to albitite (Figure 2h), but are phyllite fragments, with obvious Na-alteration and bleaching at their margins, in the albitite breccia near silty phyllite (Figure 2i).
To constrain the petrogenesis and formation age of albitite and albitite breccia in the Shangnan area, representative samples of the five rock types were systematically collected. Mineral abbreviations are from [38].

4. Analysis Methods

All analyses were carried out at the State Key Laboratory of Continental Evolution and Early Life, Xi’an, China, except for monazite U–Pb dating and trace-element analyses, which were performed at Wuhan SampleSolution Analytical Technology Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China).
Mineral Automated Quantitative Analysis (TIMA) was conducted using a TIMA3 X GHM instrument (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic). Analyses were performed in dot-mapping mode with an accelerating voltage of 25 kV, beam current of 10 nA, working distance of 15 mm, EDS pixel spacing of 9 μm, and >1000 X-ray counts per pixel.
Mineral compositions were determined using a JXA-8230 electron microprobe (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Operating conditions were 15 kV accelerating voltage, 10 nA beam current (50 nA for monazite), and beam diameters of 5 μm (feldspar and monazite) or 1 μm (other phases). Structure Probe, Inc. (SPI) standards were used for calibration, and data were reduced using ZAF correction procedures. Analytical precision was better than ±2%. The results are presented in Table A1 and Table A2.
Whole-rock trace-element concentrations were obtained using an Agilent 7500a inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP–MS) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analytical quality was controlled using USGS reference materials BHVO-2, AGV-2, BCR-2, GSP-2, and replicate samples, and the precision was better than 10% for most elements. The results are presented in Table A3.
Zircon and monazite grains were separated by heavy-liquid and magnetic separation techniques, and then embedded in epoxy and polished to their half-thickness. Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging was conducted using a Mono CL3+ detector (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA) mounted on a scanning electron microscope. Zircon U–Pb isotopic and trace element compositions were analyzed using an Agilent 7500a ICP–MS (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with a ComPex102 Excimer laser (Lambda Physik, Göttingen, Germany) and a GeoLas 200M optical system (MicroLas, Göttingen, Germany) with a spot size of 35 μm. Natural reference material 91500 was used as the external age standard. Natural reference material GJ-1 was used to monitor data quality and yielded a concordia age of 606.5 ± 2.7 Ma (n = 26), which is consistent with the recommended age of 599.8 ± 1.7 Ma [39]. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference material 610 was used as the external reference material and 29Si as the internal standard element to calibrate trace element concentrations. Age calculations and concordia diagram construction were performed using Isoplot (ver. 4.15) [40]. The results are presented in Table A4.
For the quartz albitite, monazite grains were separated, mounted in epoxy, and polished for analysis; for all other samples, in situ monazite analysis was performed directly on polished thin sections. Backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of monazite was performed using a JXA-8230 electron microprobe (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Simultaneous U–Pb isotopic dating and trace element analysis were carried out utilizing an Agilent 7900 ICP–MS system with a spot size of 16 μm and repetition rate of 2 Hz. Monazite 44069 [41] and glass reference material NIST standard reference material 610 were used as external standards for isotope and trace element fractionation corrections, respectively. Monazite Trebilcock served as a monitoring standard and yielded a concordia age of 274.9 ± 0.78 Ma (n = 6), which is consistent with the recommended age of 272 ± 2 Ma [42]. Age calculations and concordia diagram construction were performed using Isoplot (ver. 4.15) [40]. The results are listed in Table A5 and Table A6.

5. Results

5.1. Petrography

The silty phyllite (XW-1) is grayish-black in color and exhibits a fine-grained lepidoblastic texture, and a phyllitic structure. It consists of quartz (50–55 vol.%), sericite (30–35 vol.%), biotite (5–10 vol.%), and dolomite (~1 vol.%), with minor amounts of apatite, ilmenite, rutile, and pyrite. Albite was not observed (Figure 3a). Mineral grains are 0.1–0.3 mm in size and show a preferred orientation parallel to the phyllitic foliation.
The Na-altered silty phyllite (XW-4) is brownish-yellow to pale red in color. It is composed of quartz (40–45 vol.%), sericite (25–30 vol.%), albite (20–30 vol.%), and dolomite (3–5 vol.%), with minor amounts of biotite, apatite, rutile, zircon, monazite, and limonite (Figure 3b,c). Compared with the silty phyllite, the contents of quartz and sericite in this rock are significantly lower, albite appears in large quantities, and all ilmenite has been transformed into rutile.
Quartz albitite (LSW-4) is pale yellow in color, and exhibits an anhedral granular texture and massive structure. It primarily consists of albite (50–55 vol.%), quartz (35–40 vol.%), dolomite (5–10 vol.%), and sericite (~1 vol.%), with minor amounts of schorl, apatite, rutile, and pyrite (Figure 4a,b). Albite occurs as anhedral grains of 1.0–1.2 mm, showing no preferred orientation and it has an Ab component content of 99%. Quartz is also present as anhedral grains of 0.02–0.05 mm. Dolomite fills interstices between quartz and albite in anhedral, irregular shapes. Its MgO content ranges from 13.97 wt% to 15.72 wt%, FeO content from 9.16 wt% to 9.53 wt%, and Mg# [= Mg/(Mg + Fe2+) × 100] is 72.6–75.3, belonging to ferroan dolomite.
The laminated dolomite albitite (LSW-8) displays an obvious laminated structure with alternating light-yellow and yellowish-brown laminae. The mineral assemblages are the same, but their grain size and modal proportions differ in different laminae. The yellowish-brown laminae have relatively coarser grains (0.05–0.2 mm), dominated by albite (50–55 vol.%), dolomite (20–30 vol.%), quartz (15–20 vol.%), muscovite (1–2 vol.%), and apatite (1–2 vol.%), with minor schorl, rutile, pyrite, and limonite. The light-yellow laminae are finer-grained (0.02–0.10 mm), and characterized by significantly higher albite content (70–75 vol.%) but markedly lower proportions of dolomite (10–15 vol.%) and quartz (8–12 vol.%) (Figure 4c,d). There is no obvious difference in mineral compositions among different laminates. The Ab endmember content in albite ranges from 97.3% to 99.9%. Dolomite has MgO contents of 14.96–16.63 wt%, and FeO contents of 7.89–8.55 wt%, with Mg# of 75.7–79.0 belonging to ferroan dolomite.
The albitite breccia (LSW-3) contains 30–40 vol.% angular clasts, which are mainly quartz albitite and dolomite albitite fragments (Figure 2h). The cement comprises coarse-grained albite (45–50 vol.%), dolomite (30–40 vol.%), calcite (8–13 vol.%), quartz (1–5 vol.%), and pyrite (3–5 vol.%), with minor amounts of limonite, muscovite, rutile, apatite, schorl, and analcime (Figure 4e,f). The albite in the clasts and cement is similar in composition, with Ab endmember content of 97.8%–99.6%. Dolomite in the clasts has an Mg# of 82.8–82.9, classified as ferroan dolomite. The dolomite in the cement is also ferroan dolomite but exhibits obvious compositional zoning, with Mg# decreasing from 89.6 to 84.3 from core to rim.

5.2. Whole-Rock Trace Elements Composition

The silty phyllite has REE concentrations of 161–202 ppm. In the Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS)-normalized REE diagram, it exhibits flat patterns plotting near a value of 1 (Figure 5a), with slight negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.70–0.93) and no Ce anomalies (δCe = 0.97–0.99). Except for lower Ba, Pb, and Sr contents, the concentrations of other trace elements are comparable to the upper continental crust (UCC). Consequently, it displays nearly flat patterns on the UCC-normalized trace elements spider diagram (Figure 5b).
The REE concentration in the Na-altered silty phyllite (75.1–202 ppm) is equivalent to that in the silty phyllite. In the PAAS-normalized REE diagram, it displays flat patterns similar to those of the silty phyllite (Figure 5a), with weak negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.78–1.08) and no Ce anomalies (δCe = 0.94–1.00). In the UCC-normalized trace elements spider diagram, it shows nearly flat distribution patterns that basically overlap with those of the silty phyllite, except for lower Rb and Ba concentrations and reduced negative Sr anomalies, which correspond to the decrease in mica content and increase in dolomite during the Na-alteration process (Figure 5b).
The quartz albitite and laminated dolomite albitite have REE concentrations of 71.8–193 ppm and 145–199 ppm, respectively. In the PAAS-normalized REE diagram, they both exhibit flat patterns that overlap with those of silty phyllite and Na-altered silty phyllite, and show weak negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.76–0.98) and no Ce anomalies (δCe = 0.93–1.01) (Figure 5a). Similarly, on the UCC-normalized trace element spider diagram, they display nearly flat patterns comparable to those of the Na-altered phyllite and silty phyllite (Figure 5b).
The albitite breccia has REE concentrations of 90.3–210 ppm. After PAAS-normalization, it displays flat REE patterns with weak negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.82–0.90) and no Ce anomalies (δCe = 0.98–1.01) (Figure 5a). Except for the obvious negative anomalies of Ba, Pb, and Sr, it also exhibits nearly flat patterns around the ratio of 1 in a UCC-normalized spider diagram, which completely overlap with those of the silty phyllite (Figure 5b).

5.3. Zircon U–Pb Dating

Following the method of Anderson [49], over 45 detrital zircon grains from each sample were randomly selected for U–Pb analyses. Only data with concordance between 90% and 110% were retained. For spots with ages of <1.0 Ga, the 206Pb/238U ages were adopted, otherwise the 207Pb/206Pb ages were used. The final results are presented in Table A4.
Zircons from the silty phyllite range from 50 to 100 μm in size, mostly are subrounded or short-prismatic, and they display varying degrees of rounding, characteristic of detrital origin. Most of them show obvious oscillatory zoning in CL images (Figure 6a). Of 53 analyzed spots, 43 are nearly concordant, and the obtained youngest detrital zircon age is 395.9 Ma. The major peaks in age spectrum are at ~438 Ma, ~837 Ma, and ~978 Ma, with subordinate peaks at ~1581 Ma and ~2473 Ma (Figure 6b,c).
Zircons from the Na-altered silty phyllite are 50–100 μm in size, and show clear evidence of rounding. Their CL characteristics are consistent with those from the silty phyllite (Figure 6d). A total of 51 zircon grains were selected for U–Pb dating, of which 49 spots yielded concordant ages. The youngest age obtained is 399.1 Ma. The age spectrum is characterized by major peaks at ~422 Ma, ~821 Ma, and ~1048 Ma, and subordinate peaks at ~1542 Ma, ~1729 Ma, and ~2473 Ma (Figure 6e,f).
Zircon grains from the quartz albitite exhibit short-prismatic to subrounded morphologies, with sizes ranging from 50 to 100 μm. Most grains show varying degrees of rounding. Their CL characteristics are also similar to those of the silty phyllite (Figure 6g). Analyses on 80 zircon grains yielded 58 nearly concordant ages, the youngest of which is 395.1 Ma (Figure 6h,i). The age spectrum reveals major peaks at ~438 Ma, ~781 Ma, and ~932 Ma, and subordinate peaks at ~1598 Ma, ~2140 Ma, and ~2513 Ma.
Zircon grains from the laminated dolomite albitite are predominantly subrounded, 50–100 μm in size, and show varying degrees of rounding, indicative of detrital origin. Clear oscillatory zoning can be observed in most grains in CL images (Figure 6j). Among 56 analyses, 52 spots yielded concordant ages, giving a youngest zircon age of 396.2 Ma (Figure 6k,l). The age spectrum shows major peaks at ~446 Ma, ~814 Ma, and ~1056 Ma, and subordinate peaks at ~1964 Ma, ~2434 Ma, and ~2747 Ma.

5.4. Monazite U–Pb Dating and Trace Elements

TIMA phase mapping shows that there is no monazite in silty phyllite, but abundant monazite grains are uniformly distributed in Na-altered silty phyllite, particularly in coarser-grained domains (Figure 3c). These monazites are subhedral to anhedral 20–50 μm grains, and homogeneous in BSE images (Figure 7). In situ analyses of monazites in thin sections show that they have low Th contents (2638.8–8704.6 ppm) and very low U concentrations (5.1–20.6 ppm), with extremely high Th/U ratios of 422.4–938.8. They have total REE oxides (ΣREO) and CaO contents ranging from 63.08 wt% to 65.93 wt% and 0.25 wt% to 0.94 wt%, respectively. In the ΣREO-CaO diagram, nearly all spots are plotted in the field of hydrothermal and low-temperature metamorphic monazite (Figure 8b). In the chondrite-normalized REE diagram, all analyses display strongly right-sloping patterns with minor negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.61–0.80), similar to those of hydrothermal and low-temperature metamorphic monazites but distinct from those of magmatic ones (Figure 8a). Since the U-Pb analyses were conducted in situ in thin sections, the analytical error for individual analysis is relatively large. Nine spots define a discordia line on the Tera–Wasserburg diagram, yielding a lower intercept age of 260 ± 45 Ma (MSWD = 2.0) (Figure 9a).
Monazite is found in both laminae in laminated dolomite albitite, but monazite in the yellowish-brown laminae is slightly larger and higher in modal proportion (Figure 4b). Most monazite grains are subhedral or short-prismatic, 40–70 μm in size, and homogeneous (Figure 7b). In situ analyses on monazites in thin sections reveal that it have low Th (1773–8528 ppm) and very low U (3.6–288 ppm), corresponding to high Th/U ratios of 12–729, low CaO (0.43–0.80 wt%) content, and high ΣREO (64.15–65.97 wt% concentrations. In the ΣREO-CaO discrimination diagram, all analyses plot in the hydrothermal and low-temperature metamorphic monazite field (Figure 8b). These gains all exhibit right-sloping REE patterns on the chondrite-normalized diagram (Figure 8a). Six analyses define a discordia line with a lower intercept age of 252 ± 34 Ma on the Tera–Wasserburg diagram (MSWD = 0.2) (Figure 9b).
Monazites in quartz albitite are homogeneous, subhedral grains of 50–70 μm in size (Figure 7c) and are evenly distributed (Figure 4b). The separated grains have high Th (3817.4–58,920.0 ppm) and ΣREO (64.15–65.97 wt%) and low U (18.1–372.4 ppm) and CaO (0.43–0.80 wt%) content, resulting in high Th/U ratios of 88.2–1525.5. Almost all analyses are plotted in the hydrothermal and low-temperature metamorphic monazite field in the ΣREO-CaO discrimination diagram (Figure 8b). They display right-sloping REE patterns with slight negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.46–0.84) in the chondrite-normalized diagram (Figure 8a), similar to those of monazites in Na-altered silty phyllite. Seventeen analyses on separated grains give more precise results and form a well-defined discordia line in the Tera–Wasserburg diagram, giving a lower intercept age of 256.6 ± 2.6 Ma (MSWD = 0.71) (Figure 9c).
In albitite breccia, monazites are present in both clast and cement (Figure 4f), but only the grains in the cement were in situ analyzed in the section in order to obtain the age of brecciation. The analyzed monazites are granular or short-prismatic, homogeneous, and 50–100 μm in size (Figure 7d). They have high ΣREO (62.86–65.83 wt%) concentrations, but low Th (3044.4–12,318.4 ppm), U (8.0–24.7 ppm), and CaO (0.28–0.95 wt%) content. All analyses exhibit right-sloping REE patterns with slight negative Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.62–0.68) (Figure 8a), and fall in the hydrothermal and low-temperature metamorphic monazite field in the ΣREO-CaO discrimination diagram (Figure 8b). On the Tera–Wasserburg diagram, eleven analyses form a discordia line and give a lower intercept age of 256 ± 20 Ma (MSWD = 1.8) (Figure 9d).

6. Discussion

6.1. Genesis and Formation Age of the Albitites in Shangnan

Albitite (breccia) in the SQTB is discontinuously exposed within Devonian strata along the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault, forming an albitite (breccia) zone extending about 400 km from Baoji in the west to the border between Shaanxi and Henan provinces in the east. They are most extensively developed and best exposed in the Fengxian–Taibai area in the western segment and the Shangnan area in the eastern segment. Numerous gold deposits, including the Shuangwang, Ertaizi, Sanguanmiao, and Jiuchaigou deposits, and gold occurrences, such as the Taipingzhuang and Baiyugou, have been discovered within this albitite (breccia) zone. Consequently, the genesis of this zone has attracted intense research interest.
Previous work mainly focused on Fengxian–Taibai area in the western segment of the albitite (breccia) zone. Although some scholars proposed that the albitite in the Fengxian–Taibai area was formed by hydrothermal metasomatism of Devonian clastic rock, this view has not gained widespread acceptance, since timing of the metasomatism was not established. Most researchers hold the opinion that albitite in the Fengxian–Taibai area has a syngenetic hydrothermal sedimentary origin, based on the following lines of evidence: (1) albitites primarily occur as conformable layers within the Devonian clastic rocks with distinct and straight boundaries [53]; (2) albitites are spatiotemporally associated with hydrothermally sedimentary siliceous rocks and barite [21,54]; (3) sedimentary structures including parallel bedding, graded bedding, rhythmic bedding, and convolute bedding, can be observed [13,21]; and (4) albite exhibits seawater-like, left-sloping chondrite-normalized REE patterns with pronounced negative Ce anomalies [13].
Compared with the Fengxian–Taibai area, albitites in the Shangnan area have not been thoroughly studied. Existing work has reported that albitites in this area occur as domes or lenses along fault zones, showing intrusive contacts with Devonian strata, and has suggested that these albitites are formed during Devonian Na-rich magma emplacement according to the obtained Rb-Sr isochron age of 364.9 ± 10.9 Ma [25].
In this study, a more detailed field investigation was conducted on the occurrence of albitite in the Shangnan area and its contact relationship with Devonian clastic rocks, and a systematic investigation, including whole-rock geochemistry and the distribution and U–Pb dating of accessory minerals, was performed. In terms of field occurrence, quartz albitite in the Liushuwan section occurs as layers, intercalated with grayish-black silty phyllite (Figure 2a). At the Boyugou section, quartz albitite forms lenticular bodies, but pure quartz albitite is only present in the center of the lenses (Figure 2b), and gradually transitions to light-yellow Na-altered silty phyllite and bluish-gray phyllite towards the periphery of the lenses (Figure 2c), which is also inconsistent with magma emplacement. Although dolomite albitite is interlayered with Devonian bluish-gray silty phyllite and preserves a laminated structure (Figure 2f), it differs from albitite in the Fengxian–Taibai area in containing abundant bluish-gray phyllite remnants (Figure 2e). Moreover, there are fractures in the phyllite layers extending into the dolomite albitite layer, and obvious albitization and bleaching have occurred along both sides of the fractures, as well as schistosity, with local formation of albitite (Figure 2f). These features indicate that the dolomite albitite is not of hydrothermal sedimentary origin but is more likely the result of hydrothermal metasomatism.
Geochemically, hydrothermal sedimentary rocks are characterized by left-inclined PAAS-normalized REE patterns with obvious negative Ce anomalies, similar to those of seawater and marine chemical sedimentary rocks (Figure 5a). However, quartz albitite and laminated dolomite albitite in the Shangnan area exhibit flat PAAS-normalized REE patterns distributed around ratios of 1, without Ce anomalies, which completely overlap with those of the Devonian silty phyllite and Na-altered silty phyllite, arguing against a syngenetic hydrothermal sedimentary origin (Figure 5a). In the UCC-normalized spider diagram, albitites also display flat patterns around ratios of 1, which are fully consistent with those of silty phyllite (Figure 5b), and are markedly depleted in elements enriched in hydrothermal sediments, such as Ba and Sr. These signatures indicate that the protoliths of the Shangnan albitites were normal clastic rocks.
In terms of zircon genesis and dating results, acidic and alkaline magmatic rocks may contain minor amounts of captured or inherited zircons, but the zircons in them should be dominated by magmatic ones [55,56]. Hydrothermal sedimentary rocks generally form in deep-water settings with limited terrigenous clastic input, resulting in a low content of detrital zircons. However, both quartz albitite and laminated dolomite albitite contain abundant zircons, which all exhibit varying degrees of rounding (Figure 6g,j), indicating a detrital origin rather than magmatic origin. The youngest age and age spectra of the detrital zircons in both quartz albitite and laminated dolomite albitite are consistent with those of the regional Devonian clastic rocks (Figure 6 and Figure 10), providing further evidence that protoliths of the Shangnan albitites are Devonian clastic rocks.
Monazite is a widespread accessory phosphate mineral in intermediate to felsic igneous, metamorphic, and hydrothermal–genetic rocks. It has high contents of Th and U, but extremely low initial common Pb, making it one of the most suitable minerals for U–Pb geochronology. Compared to zircon, monazite can easily undergo recrystallization and dissolution–reprecipitation processes during metamorphism and fluid-rock interaction, thereby serving as a more robust recorder of metamorphic or fluid events [50,52]. Moreover, monazites of different origins exhibit distinct textural properties and vary in composition. Magmatic monazite typically exhibits oscillatory, sector zoning, or homogeneous texture, has relative high ThO2 (typically >3 wt%) and CaO (0.5–3.0 wt%) but low ΣREO (mostly <62 wt%) contents, and shows a pronounced negative Eu anomaly (δEu = 0.01–0.20) in a chondrite-normalized diagram (Figure 8). Hydrothermal monazite commonly show concentric oscillatory, sector zoning, or homogeneous texture, whereas low-temperature (greenschist-facies) metamorphic monazite typically shows a skeletal structure or occurs as overgrowth rims on inherited cores [50,52,60,61,62,63]. These two types of monazite have similar trace elements composition of low ThO2 (typically <3 wt%), CaO (0.03–0.9 wt%) but high ΣREO (62–70 wt%) content, and both show weak negative Eu anomalies (Figure 8). TIMA phase mapping reveals that monazite is completely absent in silty phyllite, but appears in both Na-altered silty phyllite and albitites, which clearly demonstrates that monazite is not a detrital phase but formed during the albitization of Devonian strata. All the monazites from Na-altered silty phyllite and albitites are homogeneous (Figure 7) and exhibit right-sloping REE patterns with a weak negative Eu anomaly (Figure 8a), consistent with typical hydrothermal monazites. In the ΣREO-CaO diagram, all analyzed spots fall into the hydrothermal and low-temperature metamorphic monazite field (Figure 8b). These characteristics collectively indicate that the monazites in the Na-altered silty phyllite and albitites are of hydrothermal origin. In situ dating on these monazites yielded three lower intercept ages of 260 ± 45 Ma, 256.6 ± 2.6 Ma, and 252 ± 34 Ma, which are consistent within analytical uncertainties. These results are significantly younger than the previously reported Rb-Sr isochron age of 364.9 Ma [25]. However, considering that the protolith of albitites is Devonian clastic rocks, shown by geochemical data and detrital zircon spectra, and Rb is mainly hosted in K-rich detrital phases (such as muscovite), the Rb-Sr isochron age is likely a mixed age of the detrital provenance.
In summary, based on the comprehensive analyses of field occurrence, geochemical characteristics, and zircon and monazite dating results, the Shangnan albitites differ from those in the Fengxian–Taibai area. They are neither hydrothermal sedimentary rocks nor magmatic intrusions, but formed by extensive albitization of Devonian clast rocks at ca. 260–252 Ma.

6.2. Genesis and Formation Age of the Albitite Breccia in Shangnan

The albitite breccias in the Fengxian–Taibai area occur as eight lenticular bodies, which exhibit a low-angle oblique cutting relationship with Devonian strata [11,12]. Deep drilling at the Shuangwang gold deposit reveals that these breccia bodies extend in tabular shape at depth and exhibit systematic internal zonation in clast composition, morphology, and size, from the core towards the margins. The core zone is characterized by a relatively low clast content, smaller clast sizes (predominantly subangular or rounded), complex clast types, and the presence of clasts derived from deep-seated strata. Toward the margin, the clast content gradually increases, clasts become larger, and displacement decreases progressively, displaying a jigsaw-fit structure, and the clast types gradually transition to country rock clasts. Furthermore, the cement contains abundant fluid inclusions with high vapor-to-liquid ratios (20%–90%), and some three-phase inclusions even contain liquid CO2. The homogenization temperatures of these inclusions reach 320–340 °C. Based on these characteristics, previous studies suggested that the central part of albitite breccia in the Fengxian–Taibai area is the product of vapor-driven hydrothermal explosion [22,23], whereas the outer zones are the result of hydraulic fracturing induced by episodic fluid overpressuring [13,24]. Fan et al. [23] obtained a youngest detrital zircon age of ca. 278 Ma from the albitite breccias, and Cheng [64] yielded a zircon U–Pb age of ca. 214 Ma for a lamprophyre that cut through the albitite breccia, indirectly constraining the formation age of the breccia to between ca. 278 and 214 Ma. Recently, He [24] performed U–Pb dating on hydrothermal monazite in the cement of albitite breccia, directly constraining its formation age to 220.9 ± 1.8 Ma.
Compared with the Fengxian–Taibai area, the albitite breccias in Shangnan are smaller in scale and are mostly observed locally within the albitite lenses, especially in the mantle and marginal parts of the lenses. The clasts are predominantly angular to subangular. The lithological types of clasts are similar to the surrounding host rocks, and no clasts from deeper stratigraphic units are observed (Figure 2h,i), indicating limited displacement of clasts during brecciation. Furthermore, studies on the Sanguanmiao gold deposit reveal that the ore-forming fluid is dominated by liquid-rich fluid inclusions with vapor–liquid ratios of only 5%–30%, and the homogenization temperatures are 180–220 °C [19]. These features indicate that both the fluid pressure and temperature during brecciation in the Shangnan area were lower than those in the Fengxian–Taibai area. In situ dating of hydrothermal monazite in the cement yields a lower intercept age of 256 ± 20 Ma, consistent with uncertainty regarding the formation age of albitites (Figure 9). Collectively, these results suggest that albitite breccias in Shangnan are likely the product of hydraulic fracturing. They formed by localized rock fragmentation and subsequent cementation due to concentrated fluid overpressure during the Late Permian hydrothermal albitization of Devonian clastic rocks.

6.3. Formation Model of the Albitite (Breccia) Zone in SQTB

The QOB is a composite orogenic belt with a protracted evolutionary history. It recorded multiple tectonic cycles, including the closure of the Meso-Neoproterozoic Kuanping Ocean, the Early Paleozoic Shangdan Ocean, and the Late Paleozoic Mianlüe Ocean, as well as Cenozoic intracontinental orogenesis [27]. The South Qinling tectonic belt is widely regarded as a microcontinent that rifted from the Yangtze Block during the Devonian–Carboniferous, and it documented the subduction and closure processes of the Mianlüe Ocean [27,29]. Extensive studies show that the Mianlüe Ocean subducted northward beneath South Qinling between 300 and 220 Ma and generated numerous 250–220 Ma subduction-related I-type granitoids. Its closure and subsequent continental collision occurred at 220–210 Ma, leading to the formation of syn-collisional granites (220–210 Ma) and post-collisional rapakivi granites at 210–200 Ma in SQTB [27,28,65].
Hydrogen and oxygen isotope analyses of ores closely associated with the albitite breccia in the Sanguanmiao gold deposit indicate that the ore-forming fluids were dominated by magmatic water [19]. Carbon and oxygen isotope analyses of carbonates in Sanguanmiao gold ores and Shangnan albitite (breccia) reveal that the hydrothermal fluids have δ13CPDB values ranging from −0.17‰ to −0.58‰ and δ18OSMOW values from 1.46‰ to 2.06‰. These data plot between the fields of marine carbonate and granite in the δ18O versus δ13C diagram, with the majority distributed along the dissolution trend of marine carbonate (Figure 11; ref. [19]; our unpublished data). Considering that the Devonian Gudaoling Formation and the underlying Sinian strata are dominated by carbonate rocks, the fluids involved in the formation of the albitites and albitite breccias in the Shangnan area may have been a mixture of magmatic water and regional formation fluids. The formation age of Shangnan albitites and albitite breccias (ca. 260–252 Ma) is essentially coeval with the northward subduction period of the Mianlüe Ocean. Therefore, we propose that the Shangnan albitites and albitite breccias may have been formed during the Permian subduction of the Mianlüe Ocean. Mixed fluids, derived from magmatic water associated with arc magmatism and regional formation fluids generated by dehydration and decarbonation of local strata, ascended along the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault and caused extensive albitization of Devonian clastic rocks, accompanied by local fracturing and cementation, ultimately leading to the formation of the albitites and albitite breccias.
Extensive studies on the albitites and albitite breccias in the Fengxian–Taibai area suggested that the albitites were formed by Devonian syngenetic hydrothermal sedimentary processes [13,21]. However, the formation age of the albitite breccias is consistent with the widespread syn- to post-collisional magmatic activity in SQTB [24,27,37,65]. Thus, it can be inferred that the albitite breccia in the Fengxian–Taibai area formed as a result of hydrothermal explosion, fracturing, and cementation of albitites by hydrothermal fluids generated during the transition from continental collision to post-orogenic extension after the closure of the Mianlüe Ocean [11,13,24].
In summary, the formation of the albitites (breccia) zone in the SQTB is closely related to fluid activities during the subduction of the Mianlüe Ocean and the subsequent orogenic processes after its closure. The albitites (breccia) zone in the SQTB were formed under distinct tectonic settings at different stages of the Mianlüe Ocean evolution.

7. Conclusions

(1)
The albitites in the Shangnan area occur as stratiform layers or lenticular bodies within the silty phyllite of the Xinghongpu or Jiuliping Formations. They are not of magmatic or syngenetic hydrothermal sedimentary origin, but rather products of complete albitization of Devonian clastic rocks at ca. 260–252 Ma.
(2)
The Shangnan albitite breccias contain angular to subangular clasts, which have similar lithology to hosting rock and show limited displacement. The 256 ± 20 Ma age obtained on hydrothermal monazites in the cement indicates that the albitite and albitite breccias in the Shangnan area are products of the same hydrothermal activity.
(3)
During the Permian subduction of the Mianlüe Ocean, mixed fluids, derived from magmatic water associated with arc magmatism and regional formation fluids generated by dehydration and decarbonation of local strata, ascended along the Fengzhen–Shanyang Fault and caused extensive metasomatism of Devonian clastic rocks, accompanied by local fracturing and cementation, ultimately leading to the formation of the albitites and albitite breccias.
(4)
The albitites (breccia) zone in the SQTB were formed under distinct tectonic settings at different stages of the Mianlüe Ocean’s evolution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, L.M. and Y.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M. and Y.R.; data curation, formal analysis and investigation, L.M., Y.R., Y.P., P.G., Z.L., and Z.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.R. and D.C.; funding acquisition, Y.R. and Y.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by the Research Special Fund of Shaanxi Geology and Mineral Resource Group Co., Ltd. (KY202223) and the Open Fund of Shanxi Geosciences Think Tank.

Data Availability Statement

Data is provided in the Appendix A.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Yuanzhe Peng, Pei Gao and Zhenjun Liu are employed by the company Shaanxi Mining Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., and received the Research Special Fund of Shaanxi Geology and Mineral Resource Group Co., Ltd. (KY202223). The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. Representative electron microprobe analyses of albite.
Table A1. Representative electron microprobe analyses of albite.
LithologyNa-Altered Silty PhylliteQuartz AlbititeLaminated Dolomite AlbititeAlbitite Breccia
Texture Yellowish-Brown LayerLight-Yellow LayerClastCement
SiO269.1368.4468.2167.4167.8367.2367.9868.0368.0668.5268.0268.27
TiO20.000.040.000.030.000.010.000.040.000.000.000.00
Al2O319.9119.4019.2319.2318.9319.3919.0619.0319.4819.0519.3419.10
Cr2O30.040.000.000.000.000.030.000.010.010.020.010.00
FeO0.120.120.030.530.060.020.020.040.050.170.150.04
MnO0.020.050.000.000.030.020.030.020.040.010.020.00
MgO0.000.000.000.010.000.000.010.000.000.000.000.01
CaO0.040.210.140.130.200.000.470.240.210.050.150.17
Na2O11.6411.4611.7911.6511.9011.9211.4311.0611.7811.8811.6012.08
K2O0.000.030.050.050.010.030.080.030.070.030.050.03
Total100.9199.7599.4599.0498.9798.6599.0998.5099.6999.7399.3299.70
O.N.888888888888
Si2.9892.9962.9982.9842.9992.9822.9993.0102.9863.0042.9932.996
Ti0.0000.0010.0000.0010.0000.0000.0000.0010.0000.0000.0000.000
Al1.0141.0010.9961.0030.9861.0140.9910.9921.0070.9841.0030.988
Cr0.0010.0000.0000.0000.0000.0010.0000.0000.0000.0010.0000.000
Fe2+0.0040.0040.0010.0200.0020.0010.0010.0010.0020.0060.0060.001
Mn0.0010.0020.0000.0000.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0000.0010.000
Mg0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0010.0000.0000.0000.0000.001
Ca0.0020.0100.0060.0060.0100.0000.0220.0110.0100.0020.0070.008
Na0.9760.9731.0051.0001.0201.0250.9770.9491.0021.0100.9891.028
K0.0000.0010.0030.0030.0010.0010.0050.0020.0040.0010.0030.002
SumCat4.9884.9895.0095.0165.0195.0254.9974.9695.0135.0095.0015.024
Table A2. Representative electron microprobe analyses of dolomite and calcite.
Table A2. Representative electron microprobe analyses of dolomite and calcite.
LithologyNa-Altered Silty PhylliteQuartz AlbititeLaminated Dolomite AlbititeAlbitite Breccia
MineralDolDolDolDolDolDolDolDolDolDolDolDolDolCalCal
Texture Yellowish-Brown LayerLight-Yellow LayerClastCement
SiO20.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
TiO20.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Al2O30.030.000.000.000.000.030.010.020.000.000.050.130.001.830.19
FeO8.579.819.539.308.017.897.908.556.166.345.983.805.720.460.40
MnO0.260.160.200.210.250.240.210.310.170.130.110.260.130.020.03
MgO15.6414.7114.1613.9715.2915.6416.6314.9616.7917.1517.9518.4118.102.230.24
CaO30.1329.9029.3129.4229.9229.9630.6430.1230.7730.6630.9830.9229.4053.2058.18
Na2O0.070.010.000.020.020.050.020.030.000.020.020.010.000.120.01
K2O0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.000.020.000.000.01
SrO0.000.000.030.000.080.000.000.050.040.000.000.000.000.000.12
Total54.7154.6053.2452.9253.5853.8255.4254.0453.9354.3155.1053.5453.3557.8559.17
CO32− number222222222222211
Factor1.9041.9281.9801.9921.9431.9281.8641.9361.8981.8821.8441.8711.8960.9380.947
Si0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Ti0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Al0.0020.0000.0000.0000.0000.0020.0010.0010.0000.0000.0030.0070.0000.0500.005
Fe2+0.2270.2630.2630.2580.2170.2120.2050.2300.1630.1660.1530.0990.1510.0060.005
Mn0.0070.0040.0060.0060.0070.0070.0060.0080.0040.0030.0030.0070.0030.0000.000
Mg0.7390.7040.6960.6900.7370.7480.7690.7190.7910.8010.8210.8550.8520.0520.006
Ca1.0231.0281.0351.0451.0371.0301.0191.0401.0411.0291.0191.0320.9940.8900.982
Na0.0020.0000.0000.0010.0010.0020.0010.0010.0000.0010.0010.0000.0000.0020.000
K0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Sr0.0000.0000.0010.0000.0020.0000.0000.0010.0010.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.001
SumCat2.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0002.0001.0001.000
Table A3. Trace elements compositions (ppm) of albitite (breccia) and host rock in the Shangnan area.
Table A3. Trace elements compositions (ppm) of albitite (breccia) and host rock in the Shangnan area.
LithologySilty PhylliteNa-Altered Silty PhylliteQuartz AlbititeLaminated Dolomite AlbititeAlbitite Breccia
SampleXW-1BYG-11XW-4BYG-6BYG-3BYG-1BYG-9BYG-8(2)BYG-8(1)LSW-8LSW-6LSW-5-(1)LSW-5-(2)LSW-4LSW-3(1)LSW-3(2)BYG-5(1)BYG-5(2)
Sc12.510.413.114.210.812.47.9611.712.19.1910.010.610.79.0132.825.07.968.02
V80.867.682.114688.269.773.687.893.834.757.548.348.651.323.620.770.5575.58
Cr77.463.780.911682.663.268.383.985.589.767.365.064.374.871.162.071.6773.26
Co38.216.418.625.255.036.342.648.618.524.042.039.138.944.537.522.923.0818.33
Ni39.227.730.041.823.018.313.930.030.112.120.417.617.615.841.030.611.2111.74
Cu28.25212.672.445.373.952.419.061.952.563.043.732.683.023.932.143.542.57
Zn17.43.432.492.702.472.121.963.561.802.252.342.692.363.046.815.042.191.91
Rb16680.711729.96.717.912.7419.819.64.0049.29.119.169.895.564.632.192.23
Sr44.147.134.040.229.922125.824.925.281.514411311510597.010428.2327.54
Y25.235.825.326.619.733.616.321.421.216.026.027.526.519.818.215.417.0017.52
Zr187168190189171313270142142199140204187472115119179.15193.96
Nb14.312.814.613.114.19.1314.314.314.014.713.512.813.014.49.829.2014.4714.96
Cs3.491.241.680.240.150.170.0400.360.390.0690.630.140.140.160.190.150.040.04
Ba30618622437.144.219.95.4312.313.45.9614120.020.216.416.713.55.464.74
La34.142.141.743.014.527.243.635.930.131.024.715.014.842.117.122.128.0245.14
Ce67.284.683.588.128.555.788.074.963.164.650.227.127.183.637.548.858.9693.62
Pr7.479.139.219.433.366.769.678.057.227.075.923.003.019.224.515.896.8010.12
Nd28.835.535.135.913.125.437.130.926.126.022.210.910.935.516.821.725.0838.55
Sm5.576.946.646.462.905.076.445.474.724.394.752.222.226.423.304.004.786.89
Eu1.061.001.400.990.590.870.930.870.780.830.950.390.401.190.620.700.771.07
Gd4.986.355.495.513.084.665.174.634.113.584.762.572.545.243.063.364.015.45
Tb0.730.940.780.760.510.740.630.610.580.450.760.500.490.680.460.450.550.67
Dy4.275.754.424.443.214.763.203.523.402.554.553.633.563.662.622.383.043.44
Ho0.841.190.860.890.661.080.560.700.700.510.890.870.830.680.530.450.580.61
Er2.433.592.492.611.933.501.562.122.091.552.382.662.541.951.571.301.681.72
Tm0.360.570.370.400.300.590.230.330.330.250.340.420.400.290.250.200.260.26
Yb2.393.842.402.722.064.201.622.302.301.752.182.722.612.011.701.391.841.82
Lu0.350.580.360.410.320.650.260.350.350.270.320.410.390.320.270.210.290.29
Hf4.984.475.064.994.467.866.813.873.825.143.645.234.8311.83.013.134.735.04
Ta1.160.901.061.031.170.801.051.231.091.081.051.021.031.260.730.621.051.08
Pb0.830.840.500.971.330.971.650.911.110.950.890.520.540.581.901.200.850.89
Th11.610.912.514.912.211.013.316.815.912.59.489.129.1314.17.458.1211.5213.11
U2.042.301.873.343.803.362.423.093.073.601.802.472.412.752.442.292.632.55
Table A4. LA–ICP–MS Zircon U–Pb data of the albitites and host rock in the Shangnan area.
Table A4. LA–ICP–MS Zircon U–Pb data of the albitites and host rock in the Shangnan area.
SpotThUTh/UIsotopic RatiosAge (Ma)
ppmppm207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U
BYG-11 Silty phyllite
1869.3971.50.890.07590.00091.87120.02360.17870.002010932410718106011
297.990.31.080.09830.00193.72640.07320.27480.0034159336157716156517
377.173.51.050.06710.00211.09730.03430.11850.001684265752177229
4562.7542.41.040.05810.00100.56940.01040.07110.00085323945874435
5261.5452.90.580.07570.00131.47760.02650.14150.0017108735921118539
6172.8233.50.740.05540.00160.55240.01610.07240.000942664447114506
7233.0535.50.440.06820.00101.35150.01960.14370.00168752986888659
8152.8297.40.510.07570.00121.71350.02840.16420.001910863210141198011
9108.3146.40.740.05750.00180.58300.01770.07350.001051066466114576
10274.1467.50.590.05950.00130.55760.01190.06790.00085864545084245
1173.0198.50.370.06830.00131.52080.02900.16160.0019876399391296611
12214.4437.00.490.16180.001810.76980.12720.48260.0054247518250411253923
1350.788.10.580.06750.00191.25880.03500.13530.0018852578271681810
14225.9217.41.040.16210.001910.66910.13250.47740.0054247720249512251624
1573.1170.10.430.06280.00160.87610.02170.10110.001370252639126217
16323.1303.81.060.06740.00121.40080.02460.15080.0018849358891090610
17316.0389.40.810.05570.00130.53870.01230.07020.00084405043884375
18218.8287.80.760.06670.00111.26160.02180.13720.001682835829108299
19324.2398.00.810.10720.00134.37510.05500.29600.0033175221170810167217
20465.4437.91.060.05620.00110.56140.01130.07240.00094614445274515
21807.9952.30.850.05860.00100.51150.00920.06330.00075513842063964
22134.7289.00.470.07120.00111.63760.02640.16690.0019962329851099511
23151.3194.10.780.08930.00132.82780.04340.22950.0027141128136312133214
24398.5441.30.900.06680.00101.31560.01990.14290.00168303085398619
25327.0510.90.640.09100.00113.25410.04190.25930.0029144723147010148615
26389.11540.70.250.09410.00103.31970.03830.25580.002815102014869146915
2740.176.00.530.05810.00260.55260.02390.06900.001153394447164306
28219.5216.61.010.06880.00121.47860.02650.15600.0018891369221193410
2990.5180.20.500.11270.00165.01930.07290.32310.0038184325182312180518
30265.7604.10.440.05620.00110.55280.01050.07130.00084604144774445
31292.4306.90.950.05620.00130.53560.01220.06910.00084595043684315
32177.5268.90.660.06690.00121.24410.02230.13500.001683336821108169
33114.1112.31.020.06590.00161.26180.03030.13880.0017804508291483810
34315.5360.50.880.05440.00130.51240.01180.06840.00083865142084265
35274.4347.40.790.07340.00131.29670.02280.12810.0015102635844107779
36348.2866.50.400.05580.00110.54430.01050.07070.00084454144174415
37312.4521.90.600.07230.00111.33800.02090.13420.00159943186298129
38376.2561.00.670.06630.00101.25660.01880.13750.00168153082688319
39192.2417.00.460.07260.00111.64840.02500.16470.00191002309891098310
40296.5268.41.100.08090.00132.26010.03770.20260.0024121932120012118913
41168.3205.10.820.09800.00153.91920.05970.28990.0034158727161812164117
42536.4879.90.610.05970.00090.66960.01040.08130.00095943252165045
43278.3486.30.570.07180.00121.16850.01910.11800.00149803278697198
XW-4 Na-altered silty phyllite
1121.5143.70.850.09780.00163.86570.06320.28660.0033158330160713162417
262.9173.50.360.07190.00141.61310.03110.16270.0019983399751297211
3157.3227.90.690.05740.00150.55380.01420.07000.00095055644894365
4955.6586.81.630.07500.00101.95530.02600.18900.002110692611009111611
5339.1528.90.640.10700.00124.45300.05250.30190.0033174820172210170116
686.6141.90.610.05570.00170.52290.01590.06810.000943967427114255
7102.4160.00.640.06710.00131.26440.02470.13660.001684240830118259
896.5271.70.350.06040.00130.64990.01410.07800.00096194650894845
9524.5491.21.070.06600.00091.15160.01660.12650.00148072977887688
101720.8941.51.830.05600.00090.49320.00770.06390.00074523340753994
11164.4462.50.360.16220.00179.95740.11220.44520.0048247918243110237422
12247.0438.80.560.06460.00101.20000.01830.13480.00157613180188158
13630.0840.80.750.15360.00169.34910.10480.44150.0048238618237310235721
14282.8303.30.930.05710.00120.52130.01100.06620.00084954642674135
1575.480.90.930.07490.00191.68180.04170.16280.002110665010021697211
16387.7349.81.110.06660.00111.13470.01880.12360.00148243477097528
1795.2224.80.420.08610.00122.69440.03840.22690.0025134027132711131913
18451.71144.20.390.05650.00090.63620.01050.08160.00094723650075065
19221.3184.71.200.05280.00230.49080.02060.06750.001031994406144216
2031.729.01.090.10580.00244.81840.10980.33040.0044172841178819184021
21126.4220.90.570.05860.00150.53200.01360.06590.00085515543394115
22175.9204.20.860.10460.00144.24520.05640.29430.0033170823168311166316
23605.9645.50.940.07440.00121.43360.02270.13980.001610523190398439
24248.1203.41.220.06660.00131.23320.02360.13420.001682739816118129
25120.2148.20.810.06460.00151.21810.02760.13670.001776247809138269
26159.8193.50.830.06560.00131.24240.02400.13740.001679340820118309
27139.4921.70.150.16320.00179.65550.10580.42900.0046248917240310230121
28129.786.71.500.05960.00170.96380.02640.11730.001558959685147159
2963.2134.20.470.09040.00143.03120.04890.24330.0028143330141612140415
30135.4318.80.420.14350.00168.45560.09790.42750.0047226919228111229421
31128.6207.50.620.05270.00140.49110.01250.06760.00083165740684225
3220.136.60.550.06410.00301.18610.05510.13430.0022744977942681213
33151.2991.10.150.07050.00091.61810.02220.16650.001894227977999310
3476.4127.80.600.05210.00160.49160.01520.06840.000928970406104275
35219.7236.60.930.05930.00160.55830.01460.06820.00085795645094265
36419.0718.80.580.09560.00113.72680.04370.28260.003115412115779160515
37167.7196.60.850.09490.00133.61030.05090.27590.0031152626155211157116
38165.2451.40.370.05150.00130.49070.01230.06910.00082625740584315
39389.5476.10.820.05460.00100.54970.01000.07300.00083964044574545
40367.2922.10.400.06630.00091.09680.01550.11990.00138172975287308
41192.8237.10.810.06450.00131.23500.02500.13880.001675942817118389
42161.0144.81.110.05670.00180.52180.01610.06670.000948068426114165
43106.5147.00.720.07440.00460.71610.04340.06980.00141051121548264359
44102.5110.70.930.07720.00161.78170.03730.16740.002011274110391499811
45449.6400.41.120.05420.00190.52370.01850.07010.001037978428124376
46202.4202.51.000.06030.00140.78200.01840.09410.001161350587105807
47280.2476.10.590.05530.00100.60550.01070.07950.00094233848174935
48250.7356.30.700.06700.00111.13210.01830.12250.00148383376997458
49199.6362.10.550.07280.00111.69560.02530.16890.0019100929100710100610
LSW-8 Laminated dolomite albitite
1223.0258.50.860.05500.00140.56240.01420.07420.00104115545394626
241.973.00.570.05980.00280.59580.02770.07220.001259899475184507
3116.6218.20.530.08720.00123.01250.04540.25050.0030136627141111144116
4197.9181.11.090.19980.002315.45310.19650.56120.0068282418284412287228
5393.5570.30.690.06420.00101.34820.02140.15240.001874832867991410
6140.2191.60.730.08150.00132.68400.04550.23900.0029123331132413138115
772.3148.20.490.06540.00141.25200.02760.13890.0018787458241283810
882.2358.40.230.07130.00121.63990.02800.16690.0020965339861199511
9102.6288.50.360.06930.00111.62550.02610.17020.00209073198010101311
10102.2123.90.820.11300.00175.43970.08550.34920.0043184827189113193121
11344.2196.41.750.05570.00140.64950.01650.08460.001143955508105246
12245.6242.21.010.12120.00156.66110.08960.39870.0048197422206812216322
1362.596.00.650.05330.00280.50540.02630.06870.0012343115415184297
14374.4832.20.450.05740.00100.53020.00950.06700.00085053843264185
1580.6444.10.180.06870.00091.57850.02300.16660.002089128962999311
16261.7373.70.700.05450.00110.55230.01160.07350.00093914544784575
17128.1377.10.340.06540.00101.21570.01990.13480.00167883380898159
18188.9494.20.380.14440.00158.45600.10030.42460.0049228118228111228122
19269.0473.30.570.05590.00100.56940.01080.07380.00094494045874595
2028.8122.60.230.06580.00171.36700.03550.15080.0021799538751590611
211316.11033.71.270.06070.00120.53060.01080.06340.00086284343273965
2295.1194.20.490.11940.00156.26430.08630.38060.0045194723201412207921
23190.3855.70.220.07520.00091.98770.02570.19180.002210732411119113112
2472.979.90.910.11340.00185.28870.08920.33830.0043185429186714187821
25205.9585.20.350.07340.00111.71050.02740.16900.0020102530101310100711
26377.6413.30.910.05860.00100.76470.01370.09460.00115523857785837
2738.489.50.430.07500.00191.84980.04700.17890.0024106850106317106113
28397.8234.61.700.06550.00131.19530.02370.13220.001679240798118019
29141.7208.30.680.15370.00189.11890.11600.43010.0050238820235012230623
3060.6113.60.530.06390.00161.15680.02850.13120.0017739517801379510
3137.944.90.840.06310.00231.23960.04470.14250.0022713758192085912
32433.2590.50.730.05400.00100.55950.01050.07510.00093724145174675
33165.4256.20.650.07460.00131.60340.02760.15600.00191056349721193410
3477.4534.60.140.06900.00101.34860.02050.14180.00178973086798559
3584.6240.90.350.06350.00131.06910.02140.12210.001572541738107439
36218.5251.20.870.15840.00189.47500.11750.43380.0050243819238511232323
37136.2265.50.510.18440.002012.71710.15440.50020.0058269218265911261525
3857.899.70.580.16330.002210.55890.15220.46890.0058249022248513247925
39224.3477.70.470.15950.00179.51390.11320.43240.0049245118238911231722
40294.9279.31.060.16440.001810.05510.12290.44330.0051250219244011236623
41183.3101.41.810.15590.002010.71520.14960.49850.0062241221249913260827
42179.4330.80.540.05650.00120.62970.01350.08080.00104714749685016
43154.7127.31.220.06720.00161.18840.02790.12830.001684248795137789
44138.183.21.660.05700.00230.50450.02030.06420.001048988415144016
4521.249.10.430.13080.00316.71230.16040.37210.0057210940207421203927
4651.5106.40.480.07620.00201.72990.04420.16450.002211015010201698212
47196.5461.80.430.07480.00131.97220.03480.19120.0023106334110612112812
4861.487.80.700.15110.00209.15120.13130.43920.0053235823235313234724
4987.1112.30.780.06890.00151.64370.03660.17300.00238974598714102912
5094.2100.50.940.06540.00171.21560.03150.13490.0018786538081481610
5162.5156.20.400.12090.00167.13750.10470.42810.0053197024212913229724
52376.5408.50.920.15750.00179.45750.11440.43570.0051242918238311233123
LSW-4 Quartz albitite
1351.1625.90.560.06100.00110.53180.00980.06320.00086393743373955
2280.4609.40.460.05920.00100.51680.00950.06330.00085743742363965
3759.01364.30.560.05540.00120.48830.01090.06390.00084294740473995
4381.8571.10.670.05820.00120.52610.01090.06560.00095354342974105
598.7158.10.620.05250.00210.47970.01880.06620.001030887398134136
6207.9325.60.640.05760.00160.52600.01450.06620.000951459429104136
7343.4398.00.860.05880.00120.54680.01180.06740.00095604544384215
8406.4551.60.740.05590.00100.53920.01020.07000.00094473943874365
9179.2258.50.690.06170.00140.60220.01410.07080.00106634847994416
101297.4721.91.800.05880.00100.57460.01030.07090.00095603646174415
11211.1251.40.840.05880.00130.58050.01350.07160.00105594946594466
12330.1357.30.920.06190.00160.61700.01590.07230.001067153488104506
13113.6208.60.540.05480.00170.54830.01670.07250.001040666444114516
1479.7166.20.480.05400.00160.54240.01660.07290.001036967440114546
15460.9351.71.310.05670.00130.57200.01310.07320.00104784945984556
16118.6214.20.550.06070.00130.61830.01380.07390.00106284648994606
1794.7179.00.530.05900.00150.60170.01550.07400.001056754478104606
18536.1590.70.910.05410.00100.56310.01080.07550.00103754045474696
19484.7468.21.040.05560.00110.59110.01210.07710.00104374347284796
20310.4471.40.660.05590.00130.59500.01400.07720.00104465047494806
21252.6227.21.110.05620.00130.68270.01610.08810.001245951528105447
22743.41070.10.690.06550.00090.82070.01250.09090.00117902860875617
23299.3348.90.860.05990.00130.78690.01700.09520.001360144589105867
24418.3415.41.010.06340.00120.87050.01730.09960.00137214063696128
25462.11057.30.440.06650.00090.92760.01460.10110.00138232966686217
2687.71085.60.080.06590.00081.06410.01480.11700.00158042573677148
27442.3589.40.750.06620.00101.11030.01860.12160.00158123275897409
28367.2608.70.600.06630.00091.12230.01740.12270.00168172976487469
2940.3346.70.120.06650.00111.13820.02060.12420.001682235772107549
30120.8165.30.730.06450.00151.11980.02720.12580.0017759497631376410
3134.634.90.990.06210.00261.08970.04550.12720.0021679877482277212
3271.8147.10.490.06140.00211.08230.03620.12790.0019653707451877611
33160.4284.50.560.06850.00111.21050.02110.12810.001688433805107779
34101.3118.10.860.06370.00151.14970.02690.13100.0018730487771379310
35266.0408.60.650.06450.00101.16890.01940.13150.00177573278697969
36507.2450.21.130.06640.00111.20740.02060.13200.001781733804979910
37137.9180.90.760.06670.00141.21910.02690.13260.0018828448091280210
3829.4101.90.290.06700.00161.25780.03140.13620.0019838508271482311
39314.1716.30.440.06900.00091.14480.01700.12020.00159002777587329
4073.9412.40.180.06810.00111.40900.02380.15010.0019871328931090111
41597.11636.70.360.06930.00081.33180.01790.13940.001790723860884110
4294.1246.90.380.06990.00111.50620.02530.15640.0020924329331093711
43420.1486.20.860.07040.00121.19690.02170.12330.001693934799107509
44109.8273.00.400.07050.00111.38660.02350.14260.0018943328831085910
45117.4198.70.590.07080.00121.58290.02870.16220.0021951349641196912
46210.6329.60.640.07160.00141.17460.02340.11890.001697538789117249
47197.3441.90.450.07280.00111.44270.02300.14370.00181008299071086610
48106.8328.80.320.07300.00111.72180.02750.17110.0022101429101710101812
49272.9617.20.440.07580.00111.76610.02800.16890.0021109129103310100612
50127.7177.00.720.07610.00131.77190.03230.16880.0022109934103512100512
51219.8896.60.250.07750.00091.77680.02440.16620.00211134241037999111
52547.71882.60.290.08140.00092.15980.02810.19240.002412312111689113413
53140.7180.50.780.09750.00153.82160.06280.28430.0037157628159713161318
54236.6211.51.120.09990.00154.29520.06910.31180.0040162227169213175020
55113.8453.60.250.13310.00166.61920.09130.36060.0045213921206212198522
56346.6454.10.760.15290.00177.35070.09600.34870.0044237819215512192821
57357.4332.41.070.16560.001810.48550.13620.45930.0057251318247912243625
58207.0384.20.540.36790.003838.09650.47630.75100.0094378316372212361134
Table A5. CaO (wt%) and rare earth element (ppm) contents in monazite.
Table A5. CaO (wt%) and rare earth element (ppm) contents in monazite.
SpotCaO *LaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHoErTmYbLuΣREO
XW-4 Na-altered silty phyllite
10.25142,971249,36527,512104,45317,283309710,23397430042462461233265.93
20.80135,021245,53727,332105,09716,8223038882278724722102271131264.27
30.73139,313243,42426,711103,80717,957356910,46998229972392291229264.81
40.46131,990234,66526,838105,57018,336367210,6729612760202172718163.08
50.72136,728239,80527,438106,80317,996342510,793101130472362251232264.54
60.60139,677244,72827,068101,23215,7532876837174623692112261332264.02
70.76135,381266,34728,20497,51712,344179456484701295108112615164.27
80.94135,165244,39027,649102,94016,3762767794173121692002251341363.68
90.82136,966256,46931,086111,30315,421216175666021694138152817165.93
LSW-8 Laminated dolomite albitite
10.62130,908254,26527,928105,04214,927284572815481572141150819164.15
20.68145,338258,65527,55998,21413,111212163694841343128132716165.09
30.58124,361253,01129,001110,88617,886301810,26585324792302511429265.13
40.59121,644255,60930,009115,18218,487312310,44684924842382561436265.90
50.43131,838251,93728,860108,50516,5312775891970620231932071130265.10
60.40142,971249,36527,512104,45317,283309710,23397430042462461233265.97
70.80139,313243,42426,711103,80717,957356910,46998229972392291229264.80
LSW-4 Quartz albitite
10.93136,983263,34329,029109,27317,6662897883374920771812311648466.83
20.44136,966256,46931,086111,30315,421216175666021694138152817166.78
30.84132,893254,17228,247102,80415,69321679709948322835149034107765.30
40.60142,934253,49727,42897,98514,84420679016855304635551035116865.61
50.84142,562252,42429,586115,84921,366446413,08210672650191180823268.63
60.60139,064254,69028,002101,88815,901216798399683385387563401321065.96
70.38142,562252,42429,586115,84921,366446413,08210672650191180823268.24
80.72139,064254,69028,002101,88815,901216798399683385387563401321065.16
90.79130,865249,30627,165101,61015,814183510,86810883890477697501601164.81
100.48124,941249,84228,778114,43624,910422820,95119924701254175721268.33
110.42128,690247,30028,004108,92417,969235511,8361222420946261239118865.40
120.88129,497245,88527,343101,10016,336201710,85210944023474686481571163.66
130.83150,739252,76227,17797,47214,32420078695805284733346832101766.69
140.54136,983263,34329,029109,27317,6662897883374920771812311648467.80
150.74151,691266,29529,642110,98419,049400611,2799202426186200108170.73
160.99132,183248,36727,906111,10817,284251712,200106232243023812690765.56
170.37143,622255,47627,42396,47414,3392011843379028143194663199766.06
LSW-3 Albitite breccia
10.28128,311262,47128,82599,77511,7741588484548216001561741129263.55
20.74109,311248,75928,810119,02018,815327911,62799427412292331125164.08
30.70116,618257,17930,625116,91115,7332334771674022762062171229264.87
40.87134,619257,99629,157103,74814,942222676906371778149150822265.06
50.35122,005247,92128,860115,61018,130305810,62393524422032031023164.80
60.95126,991257,06430,997113,38715,7992624885479123071761951025165.83
70.54123,807254,18230,402113,05116,4252559903578822061962051127265.12
80.57119,402255,43729,268113,20215,6082329763471522722012281232264.38
90.83115,775255,84929,749116,17515,374243379686281917164146819164.23
100.26128,176251,62330,162121,57314,6662327767462719961721991129265.82
110.57116,700242,95729,386113,93416,912243485486831916164186922162.86
* Measured by EPMA.
Table A6. LA–ICP–MS Monazite U–Pb data of the albitite (breccia) and host rock in the Shangnan area.
Table A6. LA–ICP–MS Monazite U–Pb data of the albitite (breccia) and host rock in the Shangnan area.
SpotThUTh/UIsotopic RatiosAge (Ma)
ppmppm207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U207Pb/206Pb207Pb/235U206Pb/238U
XW-4 Na-altered silty phyllite
14044.841.398.00.43290.07403.93440.58760.09010.00924027258162112155655
25542.86.0928.20.18580.05043.51150.64160.07080.00512705462153014444131
38704.620.6422.40.17930.04911.67940.62490.05710.00532646471100123735833
45529.98.8626.80.15940.04532.20500.51570.05590.00522449499118316335132
57130.07.6938.80.27120.07042.47380.48120.05880.00493313419126414136930
68604.710.7805.10.18290.03872.12500.31220.05270.00492679356115710133130
75079.110.1504.60.14520.04144.31010.66380.06680.00922300510169512741756
85423.66.4843.90.23040.05135.81911.47100.09010.00843055358194921955650
98252.215.9517.90.09060.02490.90450.19900.04830.0039143954465410630424
LSW-8 Laminated dolomite albitite
18527.618.6459.00.09360.03200.47760.12080.04230.003215006883968326720
22653.93.6728.80.16070.04574.57621.04380.08560.01222463498174519053072
31773.216.8105.70.20250.04591.23190.22170.04970.0037284737781510131323
46317.09.7651.40.10330.03211.32500.22930.04750.0047168460385710029929
53256.38.6377.60.10230.03085.15022.91770.08170.027416785841844482507163
62847.17.7370.60.17790.04533.40230.81810.06680.00622635436150518941737
LSW-4 Quartz albitite
117,156.122.5763.40.08090.01160.41990.06700.04070.00121218287356482578
230,550.8292.8104.30.05390.00340.29540.01770.04020.0006365143263142543
336,135.1372.497.00.04910.00340.27840.01830.04120.0006150159249152604
429,657.6336.488.20.05250.00320.29070.01610.04100.0007306139259132594
54371.125.3172.80.12300.02100.67940.08690.04420.002020003075265327913
631,462.0166.8188.60.05680.00370.31260.01830.04070.0008483146276142575
73817.424.7154.60.06040.00340.35380.02100.04240.0006617122308162674
828,632.1253.4113.00.13480.01380.77600.07260.04420.00132161180583412798
958,920.0341.5172.50.06020.00700.31560.02860.04050.0011613258279222567
1023,549.646.9502.00.23170.02911.33330.15350.04590.002430642028606728914
1132,129.1329.297.60.06470.00780.34020.03410.04140.0013765262297262618
1211,677.218.1645.00.06750.00710.37030.03670.04080.0009854220320272586
1349,930.532.71525.50.05780.00390.32190.02070.04110.0006520149283162594
1430,699.3336.191.30.41550.04992.87740.20180.06160.0026396618113765338516
1545,981.769.8658.50.25480.04301.27970.19390.04780.002932152698378630118
167017.219.6357.80.06030.00520.32310.02210.04050.0009617189284172565
1742,659.0112.9377.80.05080.00300.27640.01530.04010.0006232137248122544
LSW-3 Albitite breccia
18657.013.7630.60.12770.03400.83300.19580.04290.0029207848761510827118
25146.219.1269.30.22130.06720.85050.13000.04600.003229905096257129020
311,208.613.9807.70.21360.05901.07750.23100.04360.0035293346274211327522
43176.88.0398.30.13030.03743.87561.02370.06760.01062103524160921342264
54008.98.7461.00.35190.073914.05612.82590.17160.0182371532527531911021100
63044.411.3268.60.13270.02991.18040.17500.05630.003922004047928235324
78501.412.9656.80.06530.02100.60970.23620.05040.004978356348314931730
812,318.412.21009.90.14620.03171.57770.34280.05680.0046230238096113535628
94497.512.3364.70.19660.04031.46150.24250.05210.0045279834291510032728
1012,222.824.7495.80.10350.02120.47830.06680.03800.002316873903974624114
114729.89.2512.30.38370.07732.93990.34820.06310.0059384730913929039436

References

  1. Schwartz, M.O. Geochemical criteria for distinguishing magmatic and metasomatic albite-enrichment in granitoids—Examples from the Ta-Li granite Yichun (China) and the Sn-W deposit Tikus (Indonesia). Miner. Depos. 1992, 27, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haymon, R.M.; Kastner, M. Hydrothermal Alteration and Mineralization of Oceanic Crust at Mid-Ocean Ridges: Processes and Products; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 223–241. [Google Scholar]
  3. Engvik, A.K.; Ihlen, P.M.; Austrheim, H. Characterisation of Na-metasomatism in the Sveconorwegian Bamble sector of south Norway. Geosci. Front. 2014, 5, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oliver, N.H.; Cleverley, J.S.; Mark, G.; Pollard, P.J.; Fu, B.; Marshall, L.J.; Baker, T. Modeling the role of sodic alteration in the genesis of iron oxide-copper-gold deposits, Eastern Mount Isa block, Australia. Econ. Geol. 2004, 99, 1145–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fitzsimons, I.C. Pan–African granulites of Madagascar and southern India: Gondwana assembly and parallels with modern Tibet. J. Mineral. Petrol. Sci. 2016, 111, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, F.Y.; Liu, X.C.; Ji, W.Q.; Wang, J.M.; Yang, L. Highly fractionated granites: Recognition and research. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2018, 60, 1201–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cathelineau, M. Accessory mineral alteration in peraluminous granites at the hydrothermal stage: A review. Rend.-Soc. Ital. Di Mineral. E Petrol. 1988, 43, 499–507. [Google Scholar]
  8. Montreuil, J.F.; Corriveau, L.; Potter, E.G. Formation of albitite-hosted uranium within IOCG systems: The Southern Breccia, Great Bear magmatic zone, Northwest Territories, Canada. Miner. Depos. 2015, 50, 293–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Azevedo, C.; Jébrak, M.; Genna, D.; Pinti, D.L. Evidence of gold related to Neoarchean alkaline magmatism in the Abitibi greenstone belt (Canada) from mineral parageneses and microscale trace element geochemistry on pyrite. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 145, 104878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wilde, A. Towards a Model for Albitite-Type Uranium. Minerals 2013, 3, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.P.; Liu, J.J.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Liu, Z.J.; Liu, C.H.; Liu, B.Z.; Wang, K.X.; Zeng, X.T.; Wang, H. A possible genetic model of the Shuangwang hydrothermal breccia gold deposit, Shaanxi Province, central China: Evidence from fluid inclusion and stable isotope. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 111, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shi, Z.L.; Liu, J.X.; Fan, S.C. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of the Shuangwang Gold Deposit, Shaanxi Province; Science and Technology Publishing House of Shaanxi: Xi’an, China, 1989; pp. 1–98. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, C.H. Metallogenic Mechanism and Regularity of the Shuangwang Gold Deposit, Shaanxi Province. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China, 1 May 2016. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; Wei, R.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, R.; Gao, W.; Wang, C.; Tang, M.; et al. Genesis of the Dongtangzi Zn-Pb Deposit of the Fengxian–Taibai Ore Cluster in West Qinling, China: Constraints from Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd Geochronology, and In Situ S-Pb Isotopes. Minerals 2024, 14, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, R.; Li, N.; Zhang, N.; Liu, W.; Guo, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, Y. Timing of the formation of the Changba–Lijiagou Pb–Zn ore deposit, Gansu Province, China: Constraints from Rb–Sr dating of sulfides and quartz fluid inclusions study. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 103, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Mao, J.; Liu, X.; Chen, S.; Wei, R.; Zhang, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, C.; Dai, J.; et al. Genesis of the Bafangshan-Erlihe Zn-Pb-Cu deposit in the Fengxian-Taibai ore cluster, west Qinling, China: Evidence from ore geology and ore-forming fluids. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 126, 103734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, J.; Yang, X.; Li, J.; He, H.; Chao, H.; Yi, P. Constraints on the Genesis of the Shuangwang Gold Deposit in Qinling Orogen, Central China: Evidence from In Situ Trace Element and Sulfur Isotope. Minerals 2022, 12, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.; Dai, H.; Zhai, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Mao, G.; Liu, X.; Liao, Y.; Yu, C.; et al. Geological and geochemical characteristics and formation mechanisms of the Zhaishang Carlin-like type gold deposit, western Qinling Mountains, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 64, 273–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, C. The Gold Mineralization Associated with Danjiang Albitite in Shangnan, Shaanxi Province. Master’s Thesis, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, 29 May 2022. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, C.; Gu, Y.; Hu, X.; Men, W.; Yang, H.; Wu, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Geological Characteristics and Prospecting Direction of Albitite and Gold Deposit in Sanguanmiao-Jiucaigou Area, Shaanxi Province. Gold Sci. Technol. 2017, 25, 35–45, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Liang, H.Y.; Wang, X.Z.; Cheng, J.P. Characteristics of gold-hosted strata bound albitite and forming stages of Shuangwang gold deposit in Shaanxi Province. Geotecton. Metallog. 2000, 24, 350–356, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  22. Hu, X.S. A Further Understanding on Genesis of Shuangwang Gold Deposit in Shaanxi Province. Gold Sci. Technol. 2009, 17, 17–22+27, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. Fan, Y.X.; Fang, W.X.; Li, T.D.; Xiao, Q.H.; Guo, Y.Q. Zircon SHRIMP Geochronology and Geochemical Characteristies of Albite Carbonate Breccia of Shuangwang Gold Deposit in Shaanxi Province and Tectonie Significance. Acta Geol. Sin. 2018, 92, 1873–1887, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  24. He, Z.G. Geology, Mineralization, and Genesis of Typical Gold Deposits in the Northern Belt of the West Qinling Orogen. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China, 29 May 2022. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, Y.; Su, C.Q.; Liu, J.Q. Characteristics and Genesis of the albitite in the East Qinling Orogenic Belt. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 1999, 18, 121–127, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  26. Meng, Q.R.; Zhang, G.W. Geological framework and tectonic evolution of the Qinling orogen, central China. Tectonophysics 2000, 323, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, Y.P.; Santosh, M. Tectonic architecture and multiple orogeny of the Qinling Orogenic Belt, Central China. Gondwana Res. 2016, 29, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, Y.P.; Genser, J.; Neubauer, F.; Zhang, G.W.; Liu, X.M.; Yang, Z.; Heberer, B. U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronological constraints on the exhumation history of the North Qinling terrane, China. Gondwana Res. 2001, 19, 881–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liao, X.Y.; Liu, L.; Zhai, M.G.; Liang, S.; Yang, W.Q.; Kang, L.; Gai, Y.S.; Zhang, C.L. Metamorphicevolution and petrogenesis of garnet-corundum silica-undersaturated metapelitic granulites: A new case study from the Mianlüe tectonic zone of South Qinling, Central China. Lithos 2021, 392, 106154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, J.; Liu, X.; Chen, L.; Qu, W.; Li, H.; Geng, J. A~2.5 Ga magmatic event at the northern margin of the Yangtze craton: Evidence from U-Pb dating and Hf isotope analysis of zircons from the Douling Complex in the South Qinling orogen. Chinese Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 3564–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nie, H.; Yao, J.; Wan, X.; Zhu, X.Y.; Siebel, W.; Chen, F. Precambrian tectonothermal evolution of South Qinling and its affinity to the Yangtze Block: Evidence from zircon ages and Hf-Nd isotopic compositions of basement rocks. Precambrian Res. 2016, 286, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, C.L.; Li, M.; Wang, T.; Yuan, H.L.; Yan, Y.X.; Liu, X.M.; Wang, J.Q.; Liu, Y. U-Pb Zircon Geochronology and Geochemistry of Granitoids in the Douling Group in the Eastern Qinling. Acta Geol. Sin. 2004, 78, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Q.W.; Zhao, J.H. Petrogenesis of the Wudang mafic dikes: Implications of changing tectonic settings in South China during the Neoproterozoic. Precambrian Res. 2016, 272, 101114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, L.M.; Li, Y.L.; Rong, C.; Li, F.L.; Xiang, H.; Zheng, J.P.; Brouwer, F.M. Geochemical and zircon U–Pb–Hf isotopic study of volcanic rocks from the Yaolinghe Group, South Qinling orogenic belt, China: Constraints on the assembly and breakup of Rodinia. Precambrian Res. 2022, 371, 106603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dong, Y.P.; Liu, X.M.; Neubauer, F.; Zhang, G.W.; Tao, N.; Zhang, Y.G.; Zhang, X.N.; Li, W. Timing of Paleozoic amalgamation between the North China and South China Blocks: Evidence from detrital zircon U–Pb ages. Tectonophysics 2013, 586, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Z.K.; Zhou, T.F.; Li, D.T.; Wang, H.; Du, B.; Zhao, D.C.; Zhang, Y.F.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z.C.; Chen, N. Geochemistry, Detrital Zircon U-Pb Geochronology, and Lu-Hf Isotopes of the Metasedimentary Rocks (Xinghongpu Formation, Late Devonian) in the Central South Qinling Orogenic Belt: Implications for Provenance and Tectonics. Minerals 2023, 13, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jia, S.H.; Liu, J.J.; Wang, J.P.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Liu, C.H.; Cheng, F. Geochemistry and Zircon LA–ICP–MS U–Pb Geochronology of the Shuangwang Au Deposit, Shaanxi Province: Implications for Tectonic Evolution and Metallogenic Age. Minerals 2024, 14, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Warr, L.N. IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineral. Mag. 2021, 85, 291–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jackson, S.E.; Pearson, N.J.; Griffin, W.L.; Belousova, E.A. The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U-Pb zircon geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2004, 211, 47–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ludwig, K.R. User’s Manual for Isoplot Version 3.75–4.15: A Geochronological Tool Kit for Microsoft Excel; Berkeley Geochronological Center: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2012; Volume 5, pp. 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  41. Aleinikoff, J.N.; Schenck, W.S.; Plank, M.O.; Srogi, L.A.; Fanning, C.M.; Kamo, S.L.; Bosbyshell, H. Deciphering igneous and metamorphic events in high-grade rocks of the Wilmington Complex, Delaware: Morphology, cathodoluminescence and backscattered electron zoning, and SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology of zircon and monazite. GSA Bull. 2006, 118, 39–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tomascak, P.B.; Krogstad, E.J.; Walker, R.J. U-Pb monazite geochronology of granitic rocks from Maine: Implications for Late Paleozoic tectonics in the northern Appalachians. J. Geol. 1996, 104, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taylor, S.R.; McLennan, S.M. The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution; Blackwell Scientific Publications: London, UK; Oxford, UK, 1985; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rudnick, R.L.; Gao, S. Composition of the continental crust. In Treatise on Geochemistry; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 4, pp. 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Piepgras, D.J.; Jacobsen, S.B. The behavior of rare earth elements in seawater: Precise determination of variations in the North Pacific water column. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1992, 56, 1851–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, J.; Nozaki, Y. Rare earth elements and yttrium in seawater: ICP-MS determinations in the East Caroline, Coral Sea, and South Fiji basins of the western South Pacific Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 4631–4644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Webb, G.E.; Kamber, B.S. Rare earth elements in Holocene reefal microbialites: A new shallow seawater proxy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nothdurft, L.D.; Webb, G.E.; Kamber, B.S. Rare earth element geochemistry of Late Devonian reefal carbonates, Canning Basin, Western Australia: Confirmation of a seawater REE proxy in ancient limestones. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2004, 68, 263–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Andersen, T. Detrital zircons as tracers of sedimentary provenance: Limiting conditions from statistics and numerical simulation. Chem. Geol. 2005, 216, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zi, J.W.; Muhling, J.R.; Rasmussen, B. Geochemistry of low-temperature (<350 °C) metamorphic and hydrothermal monazite. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2024, 249, 104668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, S.S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 1989, 42, 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liang, X.; Xu, Y.J.; Zi, J.W.; Zhang, H.C.; Du, Y.S. Genetic Mineralogy of Monazite and Constraints on Interpretation of U-Th-Pb Ages. Earth Sci. 2022, 47, 1383–1398, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, J.P.; Liu, Z.J.; Wang, K.X.; Zeng, X.T.; Liu, J.J.; Zhang, F.F. Typomorphic Characteristics of Pyrites from the Shuangwang Gold Deposit, Shaanxi, China: Index to Deep Ore Exploration. Minerals 2019, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fang, W.X.; Zhang, G.W.; Hu, R.Z.; Liu, F.J. On Implications of the Devonian Hydrothermal Sedimentary Facies in the Qinling Orogeny. Acta Sed. Sin. 2001, 19, 48–54, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  55. Bea, F.; Morales, I.; Molina, J.F.; Montero, P.; Cambeses, A. Zircon stability grids in crustal partial melts: Implications for zircon inheritance. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2021, 176, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schaltegger, U.; Brack, P.; Ovtcharova, M.; Peytcheva, I.; Schoene, B.; Stracke, A.; Marocchi, M.; Bargossi, G.M. Zircon and titanite recording 1.5 million years of magma accretion, crystallization and initial cooling in a composite pluton (southern Adamello batholith, northern Italy). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2009, 286, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, L.Y.; Luo, Y.L.; Liu, X.C.; Qu, W.; Hu, J. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircons from the Liuling Group in the South Qinling tectonic belt and its tectonic significance. Geol. Bull. China 2014, 33, 1363–1378, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  58. Liao, X.Y.; Wang, Y.W.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Santosh, M. Detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic data from the Liuling Group in the South Qinling belt: Provenance and tectonic implications. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2017, 134, 244–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, X.; Dong, Y.P.; Tan, X.; Chen, Q.; Wei, K. Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology and provenance of Silurian, Devonian and Permian sedimentary rocks, South Qinling: Constraints on late Palaeozoic tectonic evolution history of the Qinling Orogenic Belt. Geol. J. 2024, 59, 811–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Williams, M.L.; Jercinovic, M.J.; Hetherington, C.J. Microprobe monazite geochronology: Understanding geologic processes by integrating composition and chronology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2007, 35, 137–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rasmussen, B.; Fletcher, I.R.; Muhling, J.R. In Situ U-Pb Dating and Element Mapping of Three Generations of Monazite: Unravelling Cryptic Tectonothermal Events in Low-Grade Terranes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2007, 71, 670–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rasmussen, B.; Muhling, J.R. Monazite Begets Monazite: Evidence for Dissolution of Detrital Monazite and Reprecipitation of Syntectonic Monazite during Low Grade Regional Metamorphism. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2007, 154, 675–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, W.; Wu, C.; Wang, J.; Zhou, T. Provenance analysis of detrital monazite, zircon and Cr-spinel in the northern Tibetan Plateau: Implications for the Paleozoic tectonothermal history of the Altyn Tagh and Qimen Tagh Ranges. Basin Res. 2019, 31, 539–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cheng, F. Studies on Material Composition and Genesis of the Shangwang Gold Deposit, Shaanxi Province. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China, 2016. (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang, X.X.; Wang, T.; Zhang, C.L. Granitoid magmatism in the Qinling orogen, central China and its bearing on orogenic evolution. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2015, 58, 1497–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geological sketch map of QOB (a) and the Shangnan (b) area (modified after [19,28]).
Figure 1. Geological sketch map of QOB (a) and the Shangnan (b) area (modified after [19,28]).
Minerals 16 00067 g001
Figure 2. Field occurrences of albitites and albitite breccia in the Shangnan region. (a) Silty phyllite interlayer within the quartz albitite layers; (b) quartz albitite at the core of the albitite lens; (c) Na-altered silty phyllite and silty phyllite at the mantle of the albitite lens; (d) small quartz albitite lens and bands in intensely deformed zones. Note that the albitite band is pinching out rapidly. (e) Interlayered laminated dolomite albitite and silty phyllite. Note that there are relict Na-altered phyllite bands in the laminated dolomite layers near contacts. (f) Laminated structure in dolomite albitite layer; (g) Na-alteration of silty phyllite along fractures and schistosity forming laminated dolomite albitite in the center of wide fracture; (h) albitite breccia adjacent to the albitite containing quartz albitite and laminated dolomite albitite clasts; (i) albitite breccia at the margin of the albitite lens contains both albitites and silty phyllite clasts.
Figure 2. Field occurrences of albitites and albitite breccia in the Shangnan region. (a) Silty phyllite interlayer within the quartz albitite layers; (b) quartz albitite at the core of the albitite lens; (c) Na-altered silty phyllite and silty phyllite at the mantle of the albitite lens; (d) small quartz albitite lens and bands in intensely deformed zones. Note that the albitite band is pinching out rapidly. (e) Interlayered laminated dolomite albitite and silty phyllite. Note that there are relict Na-altered phyllite bands in the laminated dolomite layers near contacts. (f) Laminated structure in dolomite albitite layer; (g) Na-alteration of silty phyllite along fractures and schistosity forming laminated dolomite albitite in the center of wide fracture; (h) albitite breccia adjacent to the albitite containing quartz albitite and laminated dolomite albitite clasts; (i) albitite breccia at the margin of the albitite lens contains both albitites and silty phyllite clasts.
Minerals 16 00067 g002
Figure 3. Microphotographs and TIMA scanning result showing the mineral assemblages of silty phyllite (a) and Na-altered silty phyllite (b,c). The cyan thumbtacks mark the distribution of monazite.
Figure 3. Microphotographs and TIMA scanning result showing the mineral assemblages of silty phyllite (a) and Na-altered silty phyllite (b,c). The cyan thumbtacks mark the distribution of monazite.
Minerals 16 00067 g003
Figure 4. Microphotographs and TIMA analyses results of quartz albitite (a,b), laminated dolomite albitite (c,d), and albitite breccia (e,f) in the Shangnan area. The cyan thumbtacks mark the distribution of monazite.
Figure 4. Microphotographs and TIMA analyses results of quartz albitite (a,b), laminated dolomite albitite (c,d), and albitite breccia (e,f) in the Shangnan area. The cyan thumbtacks mark the distribution of monazite.
Minerals 16 00067 g004
Figure 5. PAAS-normalized REE (a) and UCC-normalized spider diagram (b) for albitite (breccia) and host rock in the Shangnan area. The PAAS and upper continental crust values are from [43,44], respectively. Marine carbonates and seawater data are quoted from [45,46,47,48].
Figure 5. PAAS-normalized REE (a) and UCC-normalized spider diagram (b) for albitite (breccia) and host rock in the Shangnan area. The PAAS and upper continental crust values are from [43,44], respectively. Marine carbonates and seawater data are quoted from [45,46,47,48].
Minerals 16 00067 g005
Figure 6. CL images, U–Pb concordia, and age spectrum diagrams for zircons from: (ac) silty phyllite; (df) Na-altered silty phyllite; (gi) quartz albitite; and (jl) laminated dolomite albitite. Red circles mark the locations of U–Pb analyses.
Figure 6. CL images, U–Pb concordia, and age spectrum diagrams for zircons from: (ac) silty phyllite; (df) Na-altered silty phyllite; (gi) quartz albitite; and (jl) laminated dolomite albitite. Red circles mark the locations of U–Pb analyses.
Minerals 16 00067 g006
Figure 7. BSE images of representative monazites from: (a) Na-altered silty phyllite; (b) Laminated dolomite albitite; (c) Quartz albitite; and (d) Albitite breccia. Red circles mark the locations of U–Pb analyses.
Figure 7. BSE images of representative monazites from: (a) Na-altered silty phyllite; (b) Laminated dolomite albitite; (c) Quartz albitite; and (d) Albitite breccia. Red circles mark the locations of U–Pb analyses.
Minerals 16 00067 g007
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE (a) and ΣREO-CaO discrimination diagram (b) for monazites in the Shangnan area (ΣREO-CaO discrimination diagram modified after [50]). The chondrite values are from [51]. Data of magmatic, hydrothermal, and metamorphic monazites are from [50,52].
Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized REE (a) and ΣREO-CaO discrimination diagram (b) for monazites in the Shangnan area (ΣREO-CaO discrimination diagram modified after [50]). The chondrite values are from [51]. Data of magmatic, hydrothermal, and metamorphic monazites are from [50,52].
Minerals 16 00067 g008
Figure 9. Tera–Wasserburg diagrams for monazites from: (a) Na-altered silty phyllite; (b) Laminated dolomite albitite; (c) Quartz albitite (d) Albitite breccia. Blue lines are discordia lines.
Figure 9. Tera–Wasserburg diagrams for monazites from: (a) Na-altered silty phyllite; (b) Laminated dolomite albitite; (c) Quartz albitite (d) Albitite breccia. Blue lines are discordia lines.
Minerals 16 00067 g009
Figure 10. Age spectrum diagrams for detrital zircon from albitites in Shangnan (a) and Devonian clastic rocks in the SQB (b). Devonian clastic rocks age data are from [57,58,59] and this paper.
Figure 10. Age spectrum diagrams for detrital zircon from albitites in Shangnan (a) and Devonian clastic rocks in the SQB (b). Devonian clastic rocks age data are from [57,58,59] and this paper.
Minerals 16 00067 g010
Figure 11. δ18O–δ13C diagrams of carbonate minerals in Shangnan albitite (breccias) and Sanguanmiao ores (modified after [19]). Data of Sanguanmiao ores are quoted from [19].
Figure 11. δ18O–δ13C diagrams of carbonate minerals in Shangnan albitite (breccias) and Sanguanmiao ores (modified after [19]). Data of Sanguanmiao ores are quoted from [19].
Minerals 16 00067 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, L.; Ren, Y.; Peng, Y.; Chen, D.; Gao, P.; Liu, Z.; Cui, Z. Genesis and Formation Age of Albitite (Breccia) in the Eastern Segment of Qinling Orogen: Constraints from Accessory Mineral U–Pb Dating and Geochemistry. Minerals 2026, 16, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16010067

AMA Style

Ma L, Ren Y, Peng Y, Chen D, Gao P, Liu Z, Cui Z. Genesis and Formation Age of Albitite (Breccia) in the Eastern Segment of Qinling Orogen: Constraints from Accessory Mineral U–Pb Dating and Geochemistry. Minerals. 2026; 16(1):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16010067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Long, Yunfei Ren, Yuanzhe Peng, Danling Chen, Pei Gao, Zhenjun Liu, and Zhenhua Cui. 2026. "Genesis and Formation Age of Albitite (Breccia) in the Eastern Segment of Qinling Orogen: Constraints from Accessory Mineral U–Pb Dating and Geochemistry" Minerals 16, no. 1: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16010067

APA Style

Ma, L., Ren, Y., Peng, Y., Chen, D., Gao, P., Liu, Z., & Cui, Z. (2026). Genesis and Formation Age of Albitite (Breccia) in the Eastern Segment of Qinling Orogen: Constraints from Accessory Mineral U–Pb Dating and Geochemistry. Minerals, 16(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16010067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop