Use of Fine Residues from Dimension Stone Processing as Stone Meal and Risk of Soil Salinization

Abstract

The processing of dimension stones for the construction sector involves transforming rock blocks into slabs via sawing and polishing. This process generates a fine-grained waste composed largely of rock powder derived from the processed rock. Several studies indicate that the rock powder produced as a processing waste can release Ca, Mg, and K. However, alongside the release of macronutrients, there is the possibility of releasing undesirable constituents, such as Na, which is also a component of the minerals forming silicate rocks. This study aimed to analyze the risk of salinization that these materials may cause to soil if applied without a thorough evaluation of their composition. Samples were analyzed in terms of physical, chemical, and mineralogical parameters; exchangeable inorganic constituents; percentage of exchangeable sodium; and sodium adsorption ratio. The data indicate that residues stored in landfills in a random and unsorted manner do not fully meet the criteria established by Brazilian regulations for soil remineralizers. However, their characteristics suggest good potential for use in the agricultural sector, although this would require blending with other agricultural inputs and/or segregating residues from certain types of rocks to comply with current regulations.

1. Introduction

The use of rock powder as a soil remineralizer may serve as an alternative to conventional fertilization methods and the maintenance of degraded soils in tropical regions [1]. Studies have shown that soluble K is released from powders of rocks such as verdite [2], basalt [3], and phonolite [4], which are rich in minerals that are not resistant to weathering, such as glauconite, plagioclase, and olivine. However, these lithotypes are not the most commonly found in Brazil. On the other hand, granitic and gneissic rocks are very common in various regions of Brazil and widely used as dimension stones for the domestic market and export for use in the construction sector. Brazil has a prominent position in the international ornamental rock market, with the State of Espírito Santo responsible for around 82% of Brazilian rocks [5]. Therefore, the need for sustainable production in this region is highlighted.

The processing of dimension stones consists of transforming rock blocks into slabs via sawing and polishing. This process generates a fine-grained residue that comprises the fines from dimension stone processing (FDSP), as defined by the Normative Instruction No. 12-N/2023 and 13-N/2023 of the Instituto Estadual de Meio Ambiente do Espírito Santo (IEMA—State Institute of the Environment of Espírito Santo) [6,7], which amended IN 11/2016 of the same agency [8]. FDSP is composed largely of rock powder derived from the processed rock itself, along with the inputs used.

Silicate rocks such as granites and gneisses are composed mainly of quartz, feldspars, and micas, which, although rich in elements important for the soil, such as K, show low solubility and are resistant to weathering. However, studies show that the rock powder generated as a residue from rock processing can release Ca, Mg, and K [9,10]. The physical properties of soil can also be modified by the application of rock flour, as demonstrated using marble and granite powder for stabilizing clayey soils [11].

In Brazil, for a material to be considered a soil remineralizer, it is necessary to demonstrate that the product influences the geochemical characteristics and productivity of plants, in accordance with Law No. 12,890/2013 [12], which amends Law No. 6894/1980 [13] and includes remineralizers as a category of input intended for agriculture. Soil remineralizers are mineral-origin materials that have undergone only particle size reduction by mechanical processes and that alter soil fertility indices by adding macro- and micronutrients for plants, thereby improving the physical, chemical, or biological activity of the soil. Normative Instruction No. 05/2016 of the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (MAPA) [14] establishes the minimum specifications and guarantees for soil remineralizers, such as the sum of bases, K₂O content, pH, and free silica content, among others. The rock waste generated from the disposal of FDSP has characteristics that make it a viable candidate to be classified in this category. However, alongside the release of macronutrients such as Ca, Mg, and K, there is the possibility of releasing undesirable constituents, such as Na, which is also a component of the minerals forming silicate rocks. Unlike the benefits of Ca, Mg, and K, Na can cause soil particles to disperse, compromising soil structure and permeability, making it difficult for water to infiltrate and for roots to access nutrients. Excess Na can cause soil salinization and harm to plants [15], particularly where the water table is shallow and evaporation near the surface accumulates salts in the plant root zone [16]. The topic is so relevant that the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) [17] considers the Exchangeable Sodium Percent (ESP) and the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) as some of the main parameters for mapping salt-affected soils.

Although parameters related to Na were not included in Normative Instruction 05/2016 of MAPA, we consider it crucial to evaluate the risks involved in using rock powder as a soil remineralizer. Until now, no study has been conducted to establish the appropriate level of Na in remineralization materials using fine stone waste. Therefore, the objective of this work was to analyze the risk of salinization that these materials may cause if applied without a careful evaluation of their composition. FDSP samples were analyzed for physical, chemical, and mineralogical parameters, ESP, and SAR. Sampling was conducted in deposits of wastes where storage is performed randomly, without prior selection or compositional sorting. This reflects the current reality of existing landfills and, if the use of these materials proves viable, the deposits could provide ultrafine rock powder to formulate agricultural inputs, thereby transforming environmental liabilities into sources of raw material.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Samples were collected from three FDSP waste deposits located in the municipality of Cachoeiro de Itapemirim, in the southern region of Espírito Santo State, Southeast Brazil (Figure 1). Deposits 1 and 3 (D1 and D3) are licensed and active landfills, where the waste is disposed of after dehydration in accordance with regulations. Deposit 2 (D2) is a clandestine waste deposit that was deactivated because it was too close to a stream, and the water table is shallow at the site; it mainly received waste from polishing and marble processing. For reasons of confidentiality and agreements with the landowners, the exact locations and names of these sites will not be disclosed.

Sampling was performed using boreholes that penetrated the deposits to their base, in contact with the subsoil. A total of 56 samples were collected, being that 15 samples collected in D1, 23 samples in D2, and 18 samples in D3. One sample was collected every meter of depth, in boreholes with depths ranging from 2 to 9 m, from the surface to the subsoil interface, so that all deposits were sampled in a representative way. The codification of samples in the Supplementary Materials explains the position of each one. Immediately after collecting, samples were identified and stored at approximately 4 °C for preservation until analysis.

2.2. Physical, Chemical, and Mineralogical Analysis

In the laboratory, a subsample from each sample was homogenized, quartered, and dried in an oven at 60 °C. Then, 100 g on a dry basis were de-aggregated, sieved using a 2.00 mm opening sieve, and placed into 200 mL plastic bottles containing ultrapure water. The bottles were agitated for 6 h in a non-volatile rotary shaker. Then, the samples were passed through a series of sieves with openings: 60 mesh (0.250 mm), 115 mesh (0.125 mm), 170 mesh (0.090 mm), 200 mesh (0.075 mm), and 270 mesh (0.053 mm). The fractions were dried again and weighed to estimate the percentage of each fraction.

To define the chemical composition, subsamples of each sample were homogenized, cut into four parts, and dried in an oven at a controlled temperature of 42 °C. Approximately 8 g were ground in an agate mortar until the material passed through a 325 mesh (0.044 mm) sieve. Fused pellets were prepared using 1 g of sample, 9 g of lithium tetraborate, and 1.5 g of lithium carbonate for analysis by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). The chemical data are expressed as weight percentages of oxides: SiO₂, Al₂O₃, Fe₂O₃, CaO, MgO, K₂O, Na₂O, TiO₂, SO₃, P₂O₅, MnO, SrO, ZrO₂, CuO, Cr₂O₃, BaO, ZnO, and Br. Loss on ignition was determined by the mass loss during the calcination process.

For the mineralogical study, approximately 2 g of each sample, after grinding and sieving, were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a goniometer equipped with a copper tube, over a 2θ range of 4° to 70°, with a step size of 0.02° and a scanning rate of 4° min⁻¹. Mineral phase identification was performed using X’Pert HighScore Plus software version 2.0a (2.0.1) (Malvern Panalytical—Almelo, The Netherlands) with the associated database. The relative quantification was conducted using the Rietveld refinement.

For pH and electrical conductivity (EC) measurement, 10 cm³ of sample was placed in a 50 mL flask, and 25 mL of distilled water was added. The mixture was agitated in a horizontal shaker at 200 rpm for 5 min and then left to rest for 60 min. EC and pH were measured with a multiparameter calibrated with standard solutions.

2.3. Estimation of Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) and Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)

The ESP is used to assess sodicity in soils impacted by salts [18] and is estimated using Equation (1):

$$\mathrm{P}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{T}={\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}}{(\mathrm{C}\mathrm{a}+\mathrm{M}\mathrm{g}+\mathrm{K}+\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}+\mathrm{H}+\mathrm{A}\mathrm{l})}}\times 100$$

(1)

in which the sum of cations in the denominator corresponds to the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC). Soil sodicity was classified following the criteria shown in

Table 1. Classification of soils by Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP).

Class	ESP (%)
Non-sodic	<7
Slightly sodic	7–10
Moderately sodic	11–20
Strongly sodic	21–30
Excessively sodic	>30

[18].

For the ESP calculation [19], the levels of Ca and Mg were determined using a KCl extractor and an SrCl₂ solution, with measurements taken by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The concentrations of Na and K were obtained following extraction with Mehlich-1 solution and measurement by flame emission spectrophotometry. The H + Al parameter was obtained by extraction using calcium acetate and titration with NaOH.

The SAR considers the levels of Ca, Mg, and Na to assess the relative activity of sodium ions in cation exchange reactions with the soil. When combined with electrical conductivity (EC), the SAR allows for to classification of the risk that a solution poses to the soil’s infiltration capacity, considering the dispersive effects of sodium [15].

SAR was determined using Equation (2), in which Ca, Mg, and Na correspond to the concentrations of these elements in the solution, in mEq L⁻¹. The SAR levels, correlated with the EC values, allow us to infer the influence of a solution on the salinity and infiltration capacity of the soil, as shown in

Table 2. Guidelines for interpreting the influence of a solution in salinity and infiltration capacity of soil based on sodium adsorption rate (SAR) and electrical conductivity (EC, in dS m⁻¹), adapted from [15].

Salinity	None	Moderate	Severe
EC	<0.7	0.7–3.0	>3.0
Infiltration	None	Moderate	Severe
SAR 0–3 and EC	>0.7	0.7–0.2	<0.2
SAR 3–6 and EC	>1.2	1.2–0.3	<0.3
SAR 6–12 and EC	>1.9	1.9–0.5	<0.5
SAR 12–20 and EC	>2.9	2.9–1.3	<1.3
SAR 20–40 and EC	>5.0	5.0–2.9	<2.9

[15].

$$\mathbf{S}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{R}={\displaystyle \frac{\mathbf{N}\mathbf{a}}{\sqrt{(\mathbf{C}\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{M}\mathbf{g})/2}}}$$

(2)

3. Results

3.1. Granulometry and Composition of FDSP Residues

The FDSP residues collected from the studied deposits exhibit a silt-clay granulometry, with approximately 80% of the particles smaller than 0.053 mm (Figure 2) (raw data are presented as Supplemental Materials in Table S1).

The predominant chemical composition includes SiO₂, Al₂O₃, Fe₂O₃, CaO, MgO, Na₂O, and K₂O (Figure 3) (raw data in Table S2), which are common components of the silicate rocks (granites and gneisses). The addition of inputs, such as lime, contributes to a significant increase in calcium concentration, and the use of slag during sawing directly impacts the iron concentration. Deposit D2 stands out for having a higher MgO concentration compared to D1 and D3, as well as a greater loss on ignition (LOI), due to the deposition of marble powder—a rock essentially composed of carbonates. The contents of Ca, Mg, and LOI demonstrate some compositional heterogeneity among the deposits, which may occur randomly depending on the type of rock being processed at the time of disposal, a factor controlled by market considerations.

The following mineral phases were identified in the samples (Figure 4): biotite [K(Mg,Fe)₃(AlSi₃O₁₀)(OH)₂], vermiculite [(Mg,Fe)₃(Si,Al)₄O₁₀(OH)₂·4H₂O], microcline (KAlSi₃O₈), quartz (SiO₂), albite (NaAlSi₃O₈), muscovite [KAl₂(Si₃Al)O₁₀(OH,F)₂], kaolinite [Al₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄], and dolomite (CaMgCO₃).

The quantitative mineralogical composition (

Table 3. Mineralogical composition of the FDSP residues collected from the studied deposits (values in percentage).

Deposit		Qz	Ab	Mu	Bt	Mc	Ka	Dm	Cc	Mt	Vm
D1	Mean	58.3	15.1	4.2	6.0	2.4	2.1	9.0	0.0	2.9	0.0
	Median	58.6	9.7	2.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	St.dev.	23.5	20.5	4.6	11.2	4.8	4.7	17.8	0.0	10.9	0.0
	Min.	22.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Max.	89.5	72.5	13.8	32.2	16.7	16.9	44.5	0.0	40.8	0.0
D2	Mean	42.0	8.9	1.8	13.0	2.3	0.9	22.6	5.1	1.5	2.1
	Median	40.3	7.7	1.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	13.6	0.4	0.0	0.0
	St.dev.	16.8	7.5	2.7	16.2	4.4	2.3	23.9	8.2	7.0	9.9
	Min.	17.4	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Max.	76.8	36.4	11.0	49.3	17.3	9.7	59.7	30.8	33.7	47.6
D3	Mean	49.0	5.4	1.2	29.1	8.8	1.1	3.5	0.0	0.0	1.8
	Median	49.6	5.9	0.0	32.1	6.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	St.dev.	10.5	4.2	4.8	12.1	8.4	4.5	9.9	0.2	0.0	7.3
	Min.	27.3	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Max.	66.1	14.8	19.1	42.0	30.3	18.0	34.2	0.7	0.0	29.0

Qz: quartz; Ab: albite; Mu: muscovite; Bt: biotite; Mc: microcline; Ka: kaolinite; Dm: dolomite; Cc: calcite; Mt: magnetite; Hm: hematite; Gt: goethite; Vm: vermiculite.

) (raw data in Table S3) is quite heterogeneous among the studied deposits and reflects the composition of the processed rocks.

Although quartz is the predominant mineral in all deposits, followed by the feldspars (albite and microcline) and micas (biotite and muscovite), the latter two groups vary in abundance. Dolomite and calcite, which are the main components of marbles, occur in small percentages, except in D2, where dolomite is the second most abundant mineral. Magnetite and vermiculite occur in lesser amounts, with few exceptions. Muscovite and microcline contain potassium in their mineral structures, whereas albite contains sodium. Kaolinite is a clay mineral typically formed by the alteration of feldspars, such as microcline; however, kaolinite is not expected in unweathered igneous and metamorphic rocks, which are most commonly used in Espírito Santo as ornamental stones. Thus, the presence of kaolinite indicates that chemical weathering is acting on the deposits, altering the stored material’s mineralogical composition.

3.2. Comparison with the Requirements of Normative Instruction 05/2016 by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (MAPA)

According to Normative Instruction No. 05/2016 of the MAPA [14], remineralizers must show a sum of bases (the sum of CaO, MgO, and K₂O contents) of at least 9% and a K₂O content of at least 1%. Most analyzed samples exhibited values within the required range (Figure 5) (raw data in Table S4), with a few exceptions in the sample set. Regarding free silica content, a maximum limit of 25% is permitted for remineralizers; however, in this case, most samples did not meet the requirement, with rare exceptions. Moreover, pH is another parameter considered in IN No. 05/2016 of MAPA, which, although not having a predetermined value, must be reported. In this regard, the FDSP residue exhibits alkaline characteristics, which may be desirable for liming soils.

3.3. Restrictions Regarding Influence on Salinity, Infiltration of Water, and ESP

Figure 6 shows the values of the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), electrical conductivity (EC), and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) measured and calculated in the FDSP residue samples stored in the three studied deposits (D1, D2, and D3) (raw data in Tables S5 and S6).

The analyzed samples generally do not present restrictions regarding salinity; in a few cases, salinity is moderate (

Table 4. Restrictions regarding salinization and infiltration capacity of the FDSP samples collected from the studied deposits (n: number of samples; ESP: Exchangeable Sodium Percentage).

Deposit	n	Restriction on Salinity		Restriction on Infiltration			ESP
		None	Moderate	None	Moderate	Severe	Excessive
D1	15	93%	7%	0%	27%	73%	100%
D2	22	73%	27%	14%	54%	32%	100%
D3	17	100%	0%	0%	71%	29%	100%

) (raw data in Tables S5 and S6). On the other hand, the restriction regarding the infiltration capacity is mainly moderate to severe, with a few cases of no restriction, implying a risk of altering the soil structure and porosity with the application of in natura FDSP. All samples exhibited ESP values exceeding the 30% limit, thereby classifying them as excessively sodic. The elevated ESP values indicate a risk of soil salinization with the continuous application of FDSP without careful dosage, particularly over the medium to long term.

4. Discussion

This study focused on the risks of soil salinization arising from the use of FDSP residues in rock meal—that is, in the mineral enrichment of soils. SAR, EC, and ESP are parameters considered in the classification of salt-affected soils [17,20], which allow inferences regarding salinity restrictions, the impact on the soil’s infiltration capacity, and the sodicity of the soil saturation extract. The material analyzed here is in its natural state (in natura FDSP), whose chemical and mineralogical composition underscores the importance of evaluating the presence of Na if these residues are to be applied to soils. The data suggest that, along with the release of elements essential for mineral enrichment of soils—such as Ca, Mg, and K—the powder derived from siliceous igneous and metamorphic rocks may also release Na in sufficient quantities to cause considerable damage. The risk of soil salinization, combined with the severe restriction on infiltration, necessitates careful management and preemptive correction strategies for its composition. This finding also highlights the importance of considering Na as an applicability criterion in the regulations for remineralizers, as current regulations do not address this type of risk.

FDSP residues are classified as non-inert with respect to several constituents, including Na [21]. Excess Na in the soil can displace essential cations (such as Ca and Mg) from soil particles, impairing the soil’s capacity to retain water and nutrients [22]. In a study with phonolite-derived rock powder, the release of a considerable amount of Na was also reported, which disrupted the soil-improving effect and indicated that caution is required when using siliceous rock powder with sodium content [4].

The Na levels present in the FDSP residue may be released by siliceous minerals common in various rock types, such as plagioclase and micas, but they may also derive from inputs used in the rock processing, which in this case are highly soluble. The liquid phase of the FDSP in the form of sludge has several soluble components in high concentrations, which differentiate it from the solid phase, composed essentially of rock powder [23]. If wastes are disposed of without drying, these solutions can be more easily released into the environment. As shown by the PCA analysis (Figure 7) involving several parameters presented earlier, samples from D1 and D3 are grouped together due to their siliceous composition—particularly the presence of the mineral albite (sodium plagioclase)—and the percentage of Na₂O determined by XRF (total composition). This composition provides higher SAR values for some samples. In contrast, D2 exhibits a distinct grouping of samples, which is explained by the higher concentration of carbonate minerals such as dolomite and the elevated levels of Ca, Mg, and LOI. D2 also stands out for its higher EC and ESP. It is known that in D2, there was prioritized storage of marble processing residues, especially residues from slab polishing, and that it is close to a water body and in contact with groundwater. This situation favors the dissolution of waste constituents.

The data presented in this study demonstrate that the FDSP residues stored in the investigated deposits do not fully meet the criteria established by Normative Instruction No. 05 of the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply [14] for classification as soil remineralizers. Most rocks processed in Espírito Santo, the major Brazilian producer and exporter of dimension stones, are igneous and metamorphic with a siliceous composition rich in quartz. The percentage of quartz found in most samples, with few exceptions, exceeds 25%, the maximum value permitted by the regulation for a material to be considered a remineralizer. However, if specific rock types are selected, it is possible to find free silica levels below the maximum required value. The composition of FDSP residues reflects the constitution of the processed rocks, except in the case of conventional loom sawdust, in which the use of certain inputs increases the levels of Fe, Ca, Mg, Ti, P, Mn, and LOI [24]. Notably, the residue generated from processing rocks in diamond-wire (or multi-wire) looms is composed almost entirely of the rock powder and water, provided that there is no mixing between the sawing and polishing effluents, as the latter may introduce potentially toxic elements and substances.

The fine granulometry of FDSP favors the release of ions into the aqueous medium. The silt-clay granulometry of the particles—resulting from the comminution of the rock during sawing—facilitates the release of chemical elements previously fixed in the crystalline structure of the minerals, which in turn may accelerate the availability of nutrients in the soil [25]. The alkaline pH of FDSP residues is another positive characteristic, indicating potential use as an ameliorant for acidic soils. It is important to note that the pH values do not reach levels that could classify the material as corrosive, in accordance with NBR 10.004/2004 [26]. Corrosiveness is a characteristic that can render a residue hazardous, which is why this parameter has been a point of concern in FDSP. However, it is noteworthy that the pasty state of FDSP—rich in processing fluids—differs from the residue stored in deposits after dehydration by filter press [23]. In the deposited material, an outstanding stabilization of the pH over time occurs due to interactions with atmospheric CO₂ [27]. Being below the hazardous threshold, the pH of FDSP residues may be beneficial for acidic soils. Marble sawdust residues have already been tested as an ameliorant for the natural acidity of soils [28,29] in place of the lime (CaO) traditionally used in liming. As already reported [2], compared to an acidic medium, an alkaline medium favors the solubilization of K from verdite—a sedimentary rock that can be used as a potash fertilizer.

Therefore, although the FDSP residue deposited randomly in storage facilities and in its original form (in natura) does not fully meet the criteria of a soil remineralizer, its excellent potential for releasing Ca, Mg, and K indicates possibilities for other agricultural and environmental applications, such as an ameliorant for acidic soils [29], as a component of substrates, and as technosoil for the rehabilitation of degraded areas [30]. It is important to highlight that there is compositional heterogeneity in the material stored in the deposits—for example, in D2, where despite the high quartz content, there is also calcite, dolomite, and an alkaline pH, which may be beneficial for acidic and degraded soils. Therefore, the use of FDSP as a soil remineralizer will require mixing and homogenization with other materials and/or segregation prior to storage, followed by analysis to verify compliance with the regulatory guidelines. Regarding salinity, some mixing alternatives should also be investigated, such as the application of gypsum, as already tested in saline-sodic soils, which increases the availability of P and Ca while reducing pH and Na levels [31].

The random deposition of residues in storage facilities, without any selection or segregation, leads to variations in the chemical and mineralogical composition of the stored material, which may hinder the prediction and control of its influence on the soil if rock dusting is intended. By working with residues segregated according to the type of rock processed and the processing method, it will be possible to control the composition of the desired material based on its potential use. It has already been demonstrated that the rate of K and Na release in FDSP residues is related to the mineral associations found in each rock type [25], such as micas and potassic feldspars (e.g., microcline) [32], which are among the most abundant minerals in the lithotypes used by the dimension stone sector, especially in Espírito Santo State.

An important requirement stipulated in Normative Instruction No. 05/2016 of MAPA is the content of potentially toxic elements (As, Cd, Hg, and Pb), which have maximum permitted values listed in ppm in the regulation. However, there is ambiguity regarding these analyses, as the extraction method to be used is not specified, and the provided values do not make sense if the analysis is performed on the mass composition of the solid material. This is a key point that requires revision or clarification in the regulation. Considering the metal content released by FDSP in leaching tests according to waste classification methods [26], published studies demonstrate that these are non-inert and non-hazardous [21,33]. In other words, they release chemical elements and substances into the environment, but not the potentially hazardous ones above permitted limits. However, as metals and potentially dangerous substances were found (although at non-dangerous levels) and some studies have pointed to possible toxic effects on living beings [34,35], it is crucial to clarify the best method for analyzing and establishing permitted limits for these materials before using them as stone flour. The segregation of waste according to the rock processing stage and the preferential use of diamond wire (or multi-wire) looms are key procedures for producing cleaner by-products, which can be aggregated into eco-products [23]. Furthermore, the characterization phase is fundamental to deciding upon the best applications to adopt, depending on the chemicals found and their levels [36].

It is recommended that future studies focus on FDSP residues segregated by the type of rock sawn and that greenhouse studies be conducted to evaluate crop performance. Leaching studies in soil columns to assess salt mobility and experiments to optimize management practices are also useful. Proper management of FDSP residues plays a fundamental role from both economic and environmental perspectives.

5. Conclusions

FDSP residues stored in deposits randomly and without segregation do not fully meet the criteria established by Normative Instruction (IN) No. 05 of MAPA for classification as soil remineralizers. In some cases, the sum of bases (SB) and the K₂O content were below the levels required by the Normative Instruction, and the free silica levels were consistently above the maximum permitted for remineralizers.

The results of the Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) indicate that these materials exhibit high concentrations of Na, classifying them as “excessively sodic” in some cases. The Na content represents a risk of soil salinization if applied without any prior study, dilution treatment, or dosage evaluation. The SAR values show that the soil’s infiltration capacity may be severely compromised. The risk of soil salinization due to high Na concentration, coupled with the severe restriction on infiltration, requires careful management and corrective strategies if this material is to be used in rock meal. This finding also underscores the importance of considering Na as a relevant parameter in the regulations for remineralizers, as current regulations do not address this type of risk.

Nonetheless, the characteristics of FDSP residues indicate promising potential for agricultural use; however, this would require mixing with other agricultural inputs and/or segregating residues derived from certain rock types to meet current regulatory requirements.