Next Article in Journal
Coupled Dissolution with Reprecipitation (CDR) Reactions and Their Impact on Copper Sulphide Mineral Surface Area and Dissolution Rates
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors of Bottom Sediment Variability in an Abandoned Alkaline Waste Settling Pond: Mineralogical and Geochemical Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluated Utilization of Middle–Heavy REE Resources in Bayan Obo Deposit: Insight from Geochemical Composition and Process Mineralogy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Baseline Cost Analysis of Energy Wastewater Treatment with Preliminary Feasibility Analysis of Critical Mineral Recovery

1
National Energy Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochran Mill Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA
2
National Energy Technology Laboratory Support Contractor, 626 Cochran Mill Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA
3
National Energy Technology Laboratory, 1450 SW Queen Ave, Albany, OR 97321, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(3), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030213
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 2 February 2025 / Accepted: 11 February 2025 / Published: 22 February 2025

Abstract

Critical mineral recovery from wastewater is an enhancement of conventional mining that can help meet growing demand. This work investigates two energy wastewaters that have previously been shown to be enriched in critical minerals, oil and gas produced water in the Permian Basin and combustion residual leachate. Treatment of these two wastewaters using reverse osmosis or thermal-based methods concentrates critical minerals, which improves the economic viability of critical mineral recovery. Revenue from mineral recovery could also offset treatment costs for operators. This work evaluates the cost of treatment for each wastewater and evaluates the potential revenue from critical minerals concentrated in the brine. The levelized cost of water for combustion residual leachate ranges from USD 1.90 to USD 16.20 (USD 2023/m3 permeate) and for produced water ranges from USD 14.40 to USD 24.30 (USD 2023/m3 distillate). Recovery opportunities range from USD 0.11 to USD 1.13 (USD 2023/m3 permeate) for leachate and from USD 8.28 to USD 42.10 (USD 2023/m3 distillate) for produced water, dominated by the value of magnesium and lithium. Comparing the maximum value of critical minerals contained in produced water and the maximum treatment costs, the value of critical minerals exceeds the cost of treatment by USD 17.80/m3 distillate, which signals a potential revenue opportunity.
Keywords: coal ash; combustion residual leachate; ash pond; produced water; Permian Basin; critical minerals; technoeconomic analysis coal ash; combustion residual leachate; ash pond; produced water; Permian Basin; critical minerals; technoeconomic analysis
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Able, C.; Schmitt, T.; Siefert, N.; Fritz, A. Baseline Cost Analysis of Energy Wastewater Treatment with Preliminary Feasibility Analysis of Critical Mineral Recovery. Minerals 2025, 15, 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030213

AMA Style

Able C, Schmitt T, Siefert N, Fritz A. Baseline Cost Analysis of Energy Wastewater Treatment with Preliminary Feasibility Analysis of Critical Mineral Recovery. Minerals. 2025; 15(3):213. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Able, Chad, Thomas Schmitt, Nicholas Siefert, and Alison Fritz. 2025. "Baseline Cost Analysis of Energy Wastewater Treatment with Preliminary Feasibility Analysis of Critical Mineral Recovery" Minerals 15, no. 3: 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030213

APA Style

Able, C., Schmitt, T., Siefert, N., & Fritz, A. (2025). Baseline Cost Analysis of Energy Wastewater Treatment with Preliminary Feasibility Analysis of Critical Mineral Recovery. Minerals, 15(3), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15030213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop