Next Article in Journal
Study on Impact Crushing Characteristics of Minerals Based on Drop Weight Tests
Next Article in Special Issue
Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy of Mullite Ceramics Synthesized from Fly Ash and Kaolin
Previous Article in Journal
Sulfide Trace Element Signatures and S- and Pb-Isotope Geochemistry of Porphyry Copper and Epithermal Gold-Base Metal Mineralization in the Elatsite–Chelopech Ore Field (Bulgaria)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Corrosion Effect of Fly Ash from Biomass Combustion on Andalusite Refractory Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Dendromass Ashes Fusibility with the Addition of Magnesite, Limestone and Alumina

1
Institute of Metallurgy, Faculty of Materials, Metallurgy and Recycling, Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia
2
Institute of Materials Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Watsonova 47, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
3
KERAG, s.r.o., 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(5), 631; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050631
Submission received: 1 March 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2023 / Published: 30 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clay Minerals and Waste Fly Ash Ceramics, Volume II)

Abstract

:
The fusibility of ash from woodchip combustion is characterised in the present work. The impact of the increase in MgO, CaO, and Al2O3 content in the bio-ash on the classification of ash into categories according to slagging and fouling indices was evaluated. The ash was characterized based on the chemical composition using slagging and fouling indices. However, these ash composition changes did not assign the ash into categories of the indices FU, SR, RS, and B/A (fouling, slagging, slag viscosity, basicity), with less ash inclination to slagging and fouling. The indices were primarily derived for ashes from coal combustion. The indices values characterizing the ash were compared with measured results of ash melting according to STN ISO 540. The measured ash fusibility values showed that the addition of magnesite, limestone, and alumina to dendro-ashes increases the DT (temperature of deformation), HT (temperature of hemisphere), and the AFI (ash fusibility index). There is no conformity between the values of the indices and the measurement of ash fusibility temperatures. In terms of temperatures in the combustion chamber, the measured sintering (Tsin) and DT are suitable for evaluating the tendency of ash to slagging and fouling as well as an accretion of ash particles sticking to the lining.

1. Introduction

The use of biomass appears to be a suitable substitute for fossil fuels and is also partly a solution to the increasingly stringent environmental regulations in the EU. Increasing requirements for reductions of CO2 emissions and pollutants (solid, liquid, and gaseous) are inevitably leading to a transition from coal to biomass. One of the significant limiting factors for industrial combustion of biofuels is the increased aggressiveness of bio-ash. Ash deposition and fouling of power equipment is a complex chemical-physical process. The bio-ash is formed by burning biomass; CO2 and water vapour are produced, and mineral substances are released which interact with the flying particles of ash. Sticky particles of ash are captured on the furnace linings of refractory materials and slowly foul and clog the boiler chamber, grates, etc. In addition to these components, the flue gases contain several aggressive gases; SO2, chlorides, sublimates of potassium, sodium, and other salts [1,2,3,4,5,6].
The chemical and mineralogical composition of ash depends on the fuel’s composition and the type of biomass, and determines its physical properties [1,2,3,4]. Bio-ashes contain a high proportion of CaO (4–60 wt.%), SiO2 (1–65 wt.%), K2O (2–35 wt.%), and smaller amounts of MgO, Fe2O3, Na2O, S, Cl, and P. These heavy metals are present in trace amounts [5,6]. As mentioned in previous studies [3,4,5,6,7,8,9], silica in the presence of alkalis (Na, K) forms low-temperature glassy melts which, as well as alkaline vapours, are aggressive towards refractory linings in boilers and metal parts in heat exchangers.
The combustion of alternative fuels (biomass, municipal and commercial wastes, etc.) increases the refractory material quality requirements of the boiler and industrial oven linings. The sticking of slag ash particles on the lining, the clogging of grates, and fouling of heat-exchange areas in the energy aggregates poses a major problem during the combustion of biofuels and some industrial and municipal wastes. An ash inclination to agglomeration in the combustion bed, slagging, fouling, etc., is evaluated in industrial practice by indices derived from the chemical composition of ash/slag from coal combustion, which are substantiated by long-term experience. Although the research focused on the verification of these indices to bio-ash is not satisfactory [3,5,6,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], an effort to use some of them for the assessment of bio-ashes remains.
The indices predicting the thermal behaviour of ash are mostly expressed from the chemical composition of the ash, eventually on correlation of fusibility temperature. Some indices from the literature [3] are briefly described in Table 1. The glassy slag forms when silica is a predominating element in the ash. Accordingly, the silica content in biomass can be a suitable slagging and agglomerate indicator. The oxides of acidic group (SiO2 + Al2O3 + TiO2 = A) with a higher melting temperature form a low melting slag in combination with basic oxides (Fe2O3 + CaO + MgO + Na2O + K2O = B). The alkali vapor atmosphere contributes to the formation of sticky silica ash particles and to its slagging. Therefore, the B/A ratio is considered as an index for ash deposit prediction according to the intervals given in Table 1. An agglomeration index (BAI) was developed to indicate ash agglomeration in the bed and category ranges were based on observed bed temperatures. The slagging index (RS) considers an influence of Fe2O3, which can influence the creation of low temperature slag located in the bed. The content of Fe2O3 in coal-ash is higher than in bio-ash. The fouling index (FU) takes into account the effect of alkalis (Na2O + K2O) which evaporate and attack the flying ash particles. The alkali (10–25 wt.%) in biomass fuels forms a low temperature eutectic slag with silica [2]. In consequence, the bio-ash has a higher slagging and fouling tendency. It is interesting that the slag viscosity index (SR) does not include the alkali (K2O, Na2O). This may be due to the low alkali content of the coal for which the index was derived. The alkali content in bio-ash is several times higher. Definition of the classification ranges (low, medium, high) is based on the knowledge of the variation of coal ash/slag quality with increasing SiO2 content.
Ash fusibility index (AFI) is calculated from measurement data from the observation of dimensional and shape changes of ash body during the heating. The measured initial deformation temperature (DT/IDT) and hemisphere temperature (HT) determine the AFI value; the index is defined in Table 1. The initial deformation temperature is defined by the first signs of edge rounding of the sample and defines the start of material softening. Biomass contains potassium which, when burned with SiO2, forms compounds with very low melting temperatures. The aim of the studies [3,10,24,25] was to clarify the relationship between K2O content and DT (start of sintering). In accordance with this correlation, different intervals for sintering tendencies were proposed depending on the DT values, as presented in Table 1. It should be mentioned that determining generally valid indices only on the basis of chemical composition is problematic, and an application of the indices derived for coal ash to bio-ash and waste-ash may then not provide satisfactory results.
The combustion of biomass, specifically wood chips, may be accompanied by a relatively high degree of unburned carbon (up to about 20%) [26]. One way to increase efficiency is to intensify the combustion process by enriching the air with oxygen [27]. This intensification will cause an increase in the temperature in the combustion chamber and in the entire heat-exchange system. The increase in temperature will affect the intensity of physico-chemical reactions, interactions of ash particles, the movement of flue gas, and the corrosion of refractory lining and metal parts of boilers. A possible way to prevent bio-ash slagging and agglomeration is to use additives that are added to the fuel to raise the melting point of the bio-ash [4,25,26,27,28,29,30].
In this paper, the effect of increasing content of MgO, CaO, and Al2O3 in various bio-ashes is evaluated. The bio-ashes were assessed on the basis of chemical composition using selected indices that predicted the inclination of the ashes to fusibility, slagging, fouling, and agglomeration, and the ash fusibility index was calculated from the measured data.

2. Experimental

2.1. Ashes and Modifying Additives

Several types of ash from a 16 MWt dendromass (wood chips) burning power plant were delivered for analysis in months 09 and 10 in 2022. The crumble slag from the boiler grate (S) and ash from the flue channel (T), cyclone (C), and fabric filter (F) were analysed. The composition of tested fractions of ash have been modified with the addition of powdery raw magnesite (M) (SMZ, a.s. Jelšava, Slovakia), powdery raw limestone (L) (Včeláre, Carmeuse Slovakia, s.r.o.), and powdery Al2O3/99.9 wt.% (A) (Lachema, n.p. Brno, Czechoslovakia). Additives were added to ash in the wt. ratio: ash:modification additives = 2:1. Labelling of sample is, for example: C09—ash from cyclone sampling in months 09th 2022; resp. C09M—ash from cyclone, 09th 2022 with magnesite additive (ash:additive = 2:1).
The chemical composition of the basic fractions of ash and modified ash with the magnesite, limestone, and/or alumina oxide is given in Table 2. Chemical analyses were carried out by the classical method; melting decomposition of the samples, dissolution of melt in HCl/deionised water, and determination of the elements in solution by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES/iCAP 6000 Series, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The presence of major phases in the samples was determined by X–ray powder diffraction analysis on a Rigaku MiniFlex600 (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), CuKα, with PDXL2.4 software and ICCD database.

2.2. Indexes Used to Predict Behaviour of Ash at Higher Temperature

The slagging, fouling, and agglomeration indices were chosen to assess the behaviour of ashes in the combustion process and their tendency to melt formation. The indices’ definitions and ash categorization by value are given in Table 1 [3,10]. The base of these indices is the chemical composition of the ash. The ash fusibility was determined by measurement of sintering temperature (Tsin), deformation temperature (DT), hemisphere temperature (HT), and flow temperature (FT) according to STN ISO 540. The sintering process leads to shrinkage of the sample while preserving its initial shape. The sintering temperature is defined as the drop in the height of the sample below 98% of the initial value [31,32]. The ash fusibility index is indicator of the temperature of ash agglomeration and sintering [14].

2.3. Determination of Ash Fusibility according to STN ISO 540

The measurements of the ash fusibility were carried out according to STN ISO 540 [31] in a high-temperature microscope (Leitz-Wetzlar 1500, Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH, Jena, Germany) with a furnace up to 1500 °C. Powder ash samples were homogenised in a porcelain dish to a grain size below 0.063 mm and then pressed without a binding addition in a hand press (2.7 MPa) into a cylindrical tablet (ϕ 3 mm × 3 mm) with weight of 0.2 ± 0.02 g. The cylindrical sample was placed in a furnace on a corundum plate and heated in a static air atmosphere at the heating rate of 10 °C·min−1. The shape profile of the tested sample was scanned fluently, and deformation temperature (DT), sphere temperature (ST), hemisphere temperature (HT), and flow temperature (FT) were detected. The allowed temperature tolerance when defining the shape of the silhouette was ±10 °C [31]. The ash fusibility index, indicating the temperature of ash agglomeration and clinkering, was calculated according to the equation A F I = 4 D T + H T 5 [3,10]. Values of DT and AFI were used to evaluate the ash inclination to slagging and fouling. The measured melting temperatures of ashes according to STN ISO 540 were assessed in relation to ash indices in Table 3.

3. Results

Composition and Fusibility Temperatures of Bio-Ash

Chemical compositions of basic ash and that modified with magnesite (M), limestone (L), and alumina (A) are summarized in Table 2. The classification of ashes according to the achieved indices values (Table 3) was compared with the measured temperature of deformation/softening point (DT) and ash fusibility index (AFI) in Table 4.
The results of X-ray analyses of the investigated ash samples show significant differences in the phase composition of bio-ash fractions. The ash-slag on the grate (S) had the character of glassy porous agglomerates. In addition to the amorphous phase, calcium silicates, calcite, and anorthite were detected. Calcium silicates (2CaO.SiO2), SiO2, and carbonates (CaCO3, and spurrite (Ca5(SiO4)2CO3) were identified in the sandy ash (T) from the flue channel. The ash trapped in the cyclone (C) contained mainly calcium silicates (2CaO.SiO2), SiO2, and calcite. The fine fraction from the fabric filter (F) was formed predominantly of arcanite, calcite, and spurrite (K2SO4, CaCO3, Ca5(SiO4)2CO3). It cannot be ignored that other complex (Ca/K) carbonates and silicates were also present in the ash fractions.

4. Discussion

During the combustion of dendromass in the atmosphere of flue gases (CO2, N2, water vapour with a minor content of gaseous K, S, P, and Cl components) the fine sticky ash particles are generated. Even low concentrations of alkali metals in the atmosphere of combustion chamber can have a significant impact on the ash fusibility, slagging, melting and grate clogging, and fouling of the furnace and other parts of the boilers. These accretions react intensively with the lining refractory materials. The values of the slagging and fouling indices of ash are determined by their chemical composition. It follows that reducing the reactivity and the stickiness of ash particles can be achieved by changing the chemical composition of the ash, e.g., by adding minor amounts of inhibitors to the fuel [26]. The effect of increasing MgO, CaO, and Al2O3 content in bio-ashes on the change in the values of some indices determining the inclination to ash slagging and fouling has been verified.
Although S09, S10, T10, C09, and C10 ashes contained much more SiO2 than F09 and F10 ashes (Table 2), their measured sintering temperatures were comparable. T10 ash, which contained the most SiO2, had the lowest sintering temperature. SiO2 content is crucial to sintering and melting of bio-ash. The measured ash fusibility temperatures of S, T, and C ashes were lower (AFI = 1207–1313 °C) than the index for F09 and F10 ash (AFI = 1410 °C and 1363 °C) (Table 3). If the SiO2 content in the ash is low and the K2O content is higher, as in the case of F ash, more intense evaporation of alkali occurs [33].
The knowledge that SiO2 in the presence of K2O, Na2O forms low-meltable glassy phases predetermines the ratio of basic to acid oxides in ash for their categorisation. The ashes were graded in categories of probability of slagging and fouling. The classification of ash based on the values of B/A, Rs, and SR indices does not correspond to the relatively high measured deformation temperature and the fusibility index (Table 4).
The addition of MgCO3 to the F ash had a positive effect: the sintering and deformation temperatures increased. However, the addition of Al2O3 promoted sintering (Table 3, Figure 1). This can be explained by the high affinity of K2O to Al2O3 and their interactions. Nevertheless, Al2O3 caused an extreme increase in the deformation temperature.
The Tsin temperatures of S, T, C ashes and modified ashes were ≥1150 °C (Table 3). The addition of MgCO3 or CaCO3 to S, T, and C ashes increased the values of Tsin, but not as significantly as values of AFI and DT (Figure 1). The MgO and CaO concentration were directly included in the definitions of B/A, RS, FU, and SR [3]. By definition, an increase in the basic oxide content cannot move the ash into better categories. The deformation temperatures (DT) of ash and the AFI indexes were slightly increased by Al2O3 addition.
The addition of Al2O3 to the bio-ash resulted in a decrease in the B/A, RS, and FU indices and in a shift of the ashes into categories with less inclination to slagging and fouling. However, the added amount of Al2O3 was not enough to shift the modified ashes into the better categories of S/A. It should be pointed out that Al2O3 is implied only in definition in the B/A, RS, FU, and S/A indices. As can be seen from the data in Table 4, the prediction of the bio-ashes’ behaviour at a higher temperature given by these indices is ambiguous, often even contradictory. Conformity of categorization according to indices with measured fusibility temperatures is minimal.
The measured Tsin and DT temperatures were not consistent with the ash classification by slag viscosity indices (SR) but correlated relatively well with the categorization by the bed agglomeration index (BAI). It seems that the sintering temperature (Tsin) was the best predicting indicator of bio-ash fouling and bed agglomeration from the measured temperatures of ash fusibility (STN ISO 540). The same value of temperature regions as used for the initial deformation temperature (DT, Table 1) could be used to categorize the bio-ash using the sintering temperature (Tsin) [31].
The shape and dimension changes of the sample profile vs. temperature were observed from low temperatures during the ash fusibility measurement. In the literature [32], the sintering temperature is characterised as the temperature of dimensional change—shrinkage between 2–5% without observation of external phenomena of melting. The solid-state sintering can take place in the presence of a liquid phase, or without a liquid phase. Due to the rate of bio-ash sintering, the presence of a liquid phase is clear [34]. Nordgern, in [35], states that the softening /deformation point (DT) of ash is related to the melting of minerals containing K2O. In this case, there was a change in the dimensions of the sample, but no change in shape.
It should be noted that the chemical analyses, as well as the ash fusibility measurements, are carried out on the post-mortem bio-ash samples. During the fuel combustion, the conditions in the combustion chamber are different, and therefore the results of ash indices and ash fusibility are considered only as indicative. The temperature and atmosphere in the combustion chamber affects the interactions of ash particles, melting, slag, sticking, fouling of ash, etc.
As it is mentioned in works [11,12] the mechanism of ash formation in the solid fuel combustion process (coal, biomass/dendromass in form of wood chips, pellets) should be divided into two temperature zones: the combustion zone and the cooling zone. The temperature in the combustion zone reaches up to 1100 °C (extreme case 1200 °C) and in the cooling zone it is below 900 °C. The processes occurring in the combustion zone are mainly oxidation, fragmentation, evaporation, and melting. In the cooling zone, agglomeration, condensation, and solidification occur.
The wood chips are scattered in the flame. The ash formation during biomass combustion can be described as a fast, consistent transformation—decomposition of organic mass due to the heat which is released when carbon burns. Hot flue gasses contain volatized alkali (K, Na) and less S, Cl. These components attack the ash micro-particles (CaO-SiO2) and form low-melting slag on their surface. Ashes become sticky and agglomerate; their size grows. The flue gases with ash proceed into the colder zone, where the bigger ash particles are captured and solidify. The bio-fuel composition strongly influences the progress of agglomeration. The composition variability of biofuels and combustion conditions are the cause of the heterogeneous deposits and ash accretions. Some volatised components later condense to form (K, Ca) sulphates and carbonates in cooler parts of the power equipment [2]. The slag on the grate and ash from flue channels contains less alkali due to the condensation of alkali in the colder parts (cyclone, filter). Since the alkaline vapours in the combustion zone greatly influence the ash slagging, fouling, and agglomeration, this phenomenon should be taken into account in the categorisation and selection of proper indices, and the range of indices changes for the assessment of the behaviour of biofuels [36].
From the results presented in Table 4, it is clear that the indices in their current form and with the classification ranges are not reliable to characterize bio-ash slagging, fouling, and agglomeration. Results from the measurement of ash fusibility according to ISO 540 are more relevant for the evaluation of bio-ash fusibility. The temperatures of sintering (Tsin) and softening (DT) seem to be most suitable for evaluation of ash tendency to slagging and fouling. This work confirmed the results of observation by other authors [3,14,22,24,37] who searched for relevant indicators to predict behaviour of the bio-ash in combustion chambers and grates.

5. Conclusions

Behaviour of bio-ash and modified bio-ash with magnesite, limestone, and alumina at combustion temperatures were characterized using indices derived for coal ash. The use of these indices has been shown as unsatisfactory for the assessment of bio-ash slagging, fouling, and agglomeration. In the case of biofuels, in addition to the chemical composition, which is highly variable in the case of biomass/dendromass fuel, the furnace atmosphere has an important influence on the formation of slag and its melting in the combustion chamber. The combustion conditions and variability of biomass/dendromass fuels should be taken into account when deriving new indices and/or adjusting the ranges of classification values.
Results of ash fusibility measured on a high-temperature microscope (ISO 540) seem to be more suitable for predicting slagging and agglomeration of bio-ash. The initial sintering temperature (Tsin) is probably the most suitable indicator of ash slagging. Measured results of ash fusibility confirmed the beneficial effect of magnesite and limestone addition to the dendromass ash (increase in MgO, CaO, and Al2O3 concentration in the ash) on the increase in temperatures defined by the points: DT, HT, and FT.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation: P.V.; conceptualization, methodology: B.P.; investigation, resources: P.V., B.P., D.M., V.P., G.S. and R.B.; validation, data curation, writing—review and editing: B.P. and P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovak Grant Agencies through VEGA–MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV project No.1/0060/22.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Niu, Y.; Tan, H.; Hui, S. Ash-related Issues during Biomass Combustion: Alkali-induced Slagging. Silicate Melt-induced Slagging (Ash Fusion). Agglomeration. Corrosion. Ash Utilization and Related Countermeasures. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2016, 52, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Plešingerová, B.; Vadász, P.; Medveď, D.; Jablonský, G.; Sučik, G.; Dzurňák, R. Characterisation of Dendromass Ash Fractions Captured in Power Plant with a View to their Further Utilization. Acta Montan. Slovaca. 2023; 28, in press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Garcia-Maraver, A.; Mata-Sanchez, J.; Carpi, M.; Perez-Jimenez, J. Critical Review of Predictive Coefficients for Biomass Ash Deposition Tendency. J. Energy Inst. 2017, 90, 214–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vassilev, S.V.; Vassileva, C.G.; Song, Y.C.; Li, W.Y.; Feng, J. Ash Contents and Ash–forming Elements of Biomass and their Significance for Solid Biofuel Combustion. Fuel 2017, 208, 377–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tortosa Masiá, A.A.; Buhre, B.J.P.; Gupta, R.P.; Wall, T.F. Characterising Ash of Biomass and Waste. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Agraniotis, M.; Grammelis, P.; Papapavlou, C.; Kakaras, E. Experimental Investigation on the Combustion Behaviour of Pre-dried Greek Lignite. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miles, P.E.; Miles, T.R., Jr.; Baxter, L.L.; Bryers, R.W.; Jenkins, B.M.; Oden, L.L. Alkali Deposits Found in Biomass Power Plants. A Preliminary Investigation of Their Extent and Nature; NREL/TP-4338142; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 1995; Volume 2, p. 122.
  8. Berlanga, C.; Ruiz, J.A. Study of Corrosion in a Biomass Boiler. J. Chem. 2013, 8, 272090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lindberg, D.K.; Tesfaye, F. The Thermodynamics of Slag Forming Inorganic Phases in Biomass Combustion Process. Eng. Technol. 2017, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vamvuka, D.; Kakaras, E. Ash Properties and Environmental Impact of Various Biomass and Coal Fuels and their Blends. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Couch, G. Understanding Slagging and Fouling in PF Combustion; IEACR/72; IEA Coal Research: London, UK, 1994; ISBN 92-9029-240-7. [Google Scholar]
  12. Skorupska, N.M. Coal Specifications-Impact on Power Station Performance; IEACR/52; IEA Coal Research: London, UK, 1993; p. 120. [Google Scholar]
  13. Barroso, J.; Ballester, J.; Pina, A. Study of Coal Ash Deposition in an Entrained Flow Reactor: Assessment of Traditional and Alternative Slagging Indices. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pintana, P.; Tippayawong, N.; Nuntaphun, A.; Thongchiew, P. Characterization of Slag from Combustion of Pulverized Lignite with High Calcium Content in Utility Boiler. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2014, 32, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, L.Y.; Wang, L.W.; Li, P.S. Study on Prediction Models of Biomass Ash Softening Temperature Based on Ash Composition. J. Energy Inst. 2014, 87, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pintana, P.; Tippayawong, N. Predicting Ash Deposit Tendency in Thermal Utilization of Biomass. Eng. J. 2016, 20, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dunnu, G.; Maier, J.; Schffknecht, G. Ash Fusibility and Compositional Data of Solid Recovered Fuels. Fuel 2010, 89, 1534–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, J.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Min, D.J.; Jung, S.M.; Yi, S.H. Influence of MgO and Al2O3 Contents on Viscosity of Blast Furnace type slags containing FeO. ISIJ Int. 2004, 44, 81291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zelkowski, J. Kohlecharaterisierung und Kohleverbrennung; VGB PowerTech, e.V.: Essen, Germany, 2004; ISBN 978-3-86875-216-8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Raask, E. Mineral Impurities in Coal Combustion: Behavior, Problems and Remedial Measures, 1st ed.; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 1985; ISBN 089116362X. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wenjia, S.; Tang, L.; Zhu, X.; Wu, Y.; Rong, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Koyama, S. Fusibility and Flow Properties of Coal And Slag. Fuel 2009, 88, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ovčačíková, H.; Velička, M.; Vlček, J.; Topinková, M.; Klárová, M.; Burda, J. Corrosive Effect of Wood ash Produced by Biomas, Combustion on Refractory Materials in a Binary Al-Si System. Materials 2022, 15, 5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vamvuka, D.; Deli, M.; Stratakis, A. Effect of Mineral Additives on Fusion Behavior of Agricultural Residue Ashes during Combustion or Co-combustion with Lignite. J. Energy Power Technol. 2021, 3, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Werther, J.; Saebger, M.; Hartge, E.-U.; Ogada, T.; Siagi, Z. Combustion of Agricultural Residues. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2000, 26, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miles, T.R.; Baxter, L.L.; Bryers, R.W.; Jenkins, B.M.; Oden, L.L. Boiler Deposits from Firing. Biomass Bioenergy 1996, 10, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Plešingerová, B.; Vadász, P.; Medveď, D.; Sučik, G.; Macháček, J.; Popovič, Ľ.; Ivánová, D.; Bakajsová, R. The Effect of Increasing MgO Content in Dendromass on Ash Fusibility and Corrosion of Corundum Refractory Castable. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 21739–21747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nguyen, H.K.; Moon, J.H.; Jo, S.H.; Park, S.J.; Bae, D.H.; Seo, M.W.; Ra, H.W.; Yoon, S.J.; Yoon, S.M.; Lee, J.G.; et al. Ash Characteristics of Oxy-Biomass Combustion in a Circulating Fluidized Bed with Kaolin Addition. Energy 2021, 230, 120871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Holubcik, M.; Jandacka, J. Mathematical Model for Prediction of Biomass Ash Melting Temperature Using Additives. Komunikacie 2014, 16, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Öhman, M.; Boström, D.; Nordin, A.; Hedman, H. Effect of Kaolin and Limestone Addition on Slag Formation during Combustion of Wood Fuels. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 1370–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Batir, O.; Selçuk, N.; Kulah, G. Effect of Kaolin Addition on Alkali Capture Capability during Combustion of Olive Residue. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2019, 191, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. STN ISO 540; Uhlie a Koks. Stanovenie Taviteľnosti Popola. ÚNMS SR: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2010.
  32. Reynaert, C.; Sniežek, E.; Szczerba, J. Corrosion Tests for Refractory Materials Intended for the Steel Industry—A Review. Ceram.-Silikáty 2020, 64, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Thy, P.; Jenkins, B.M.; Lesher, C.E. High-temperature Melting Behavior of Urban Wood Fuel Ash. Energy Fuels 1999, 13, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kingery, W.D.; Bowen, H.K.; Uhlmann, D.R. Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons. Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1976; p. 469. ISBN 0-471-47860-1. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nordgren, D.; Hedman, H.; Padban, N.; Boström, D.; Öhman, M. Ash Transformations in Pulverised Fuel Co-combustion of Straw and Woody Biomass. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 105, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Plešingerová, B.; Derin, B.; Vadász, P.; Medveď, D. Analysis of Deposits from Combustion Chamber of Boiler for Dendromass. Fuel 2020, 266, 117069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Holubčík, M.; Jandačka, J.; Malcho, M. Ash melting temperature prediction from chemical composition of biomass ash. Holist. Approach Environ. 2015, 5, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of magnesite, limestone, and Al2O3 addition to S, C, T, and F ash on (a) sintering temperature (Tsin); (b) deformation temperature (DT).
Figure 1. Effect of magnesite, limestone, and Al2O3 addition to S, C, T, and F ash on (a) sintering temperature (Tsin); (b) deformation temperature (DT).
Minerals 13 00631 g001
Table 1. Categorization of ash according to slagging and fouling indices and ash fusibility [3,10].
Table 1. Categorization of ash according to slagging and fouling indices and ash fusibility [3,10].
Characterization
of Ash
Index DefinitionIndices Value of Ash Inclination to Slagging, Fouling, and Ash Fusibility Temperature
LowMediumHighExtremely High
Silica contentS = S i O 2 <2020–25>25-
Basicity B / A = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + N a 2 O + K 2 O S i O 2 + A l 2 O 3 + T i O 2 ˂0.50.5–1.01.0–1.75>1.75
Slagging index R S = B A . F e 2 O 3 ˂0.60.6–2.02.0–2.6-
Fouling index F U = B A . ( N a 2 O + K 2 O ) ˂0.60.6–40>40-
Slag viscosity index S R = S i O 2 × 100 S i O 2 + F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O >7265–72˂65-
Alkalinity-Total alkali T A = N a 2 O + K 2 O >0.30.3–0.4>0.4-
Silica-Alumina ratio S / A = S i O 2 A l 2 O 3 ˂0.31 and >3-0.3–3.0-
Bed agglomeration index B A I = F e 2 O 3 N a 2 O + K 2 O --˂0.15-
Ash fusibility index [°C] A F I = 4 D T + H T 5 >13421232–13421052–1232˂1052
Initial softening temperature [°C]DT (IDT)-initial deformation temperature (softening) >1100900–1100˂900-
Table 2. Chemical composition of bio-ashes (basic and modified with magnesite (M), limestone (L) and alumina (A)).
Table 2. Chemical composition of bio-ashes (basic and modified with magnesite (M), limestone (L) and alumina (A)).
SampleChemical Composition [wt.%]
Al2O3SiO2CaOMgOFe2O3MnONa2OK2OL.O.I.
S095.52548.83.63.11.30.43.39
S105.935.628.04.02.90.81.08.210.8
T106.648.921.12.92.80.61.46.54.7
C093.217.247.63.52.50.80.33.721.1
C104.521.738.03.42.10.80.77.012.6
F091.23.250.34.11.51.20.315.123.1
F101.34.632.63.20.80.81.018.420.9
S09M4.718.535.817.23.6112.315.9
C09M3.212.834.317.83.20.612.624.4
F09M1.83.33618.42.20.8110.226
S09L3.816.949.82.52.20.90.42.220.3
C09L2.311.749.02.41.80.50.32.528.4
F09L1.02.350.82.81.10.80.310.129.7
S09A37.016.732.52.42.10.90.32.26.0
S10A37.323.718.72.61.90.50.75.57.2
T10A37.732.614.12.01.90.40.94.43.1
C09A35.511.531.72.31.70.50.22.514.1
C10A36.414.525.32.31.40.60.54.78.4
F09A34.12.133.52.71.00.80.210.715.4
F10A34.23.121.82.10.50.50.712.314.0
L.O.I—Loss on ignition.
Table 3. Characteristic temperatures of bio-ash fusion measured according to STN ISO 540 [31].
Table 3. Characteristic temperatures of bio-ash fusion measured according to STN ISO 540 [31].
SampleInitial Sintering Temperature Tsin [°C]Deformation Temperature
DT [°C]
Spherical
Temperature
ST [°C]
Hemisphere Temperature HT [°C]Flow
Temperature
FT [°C]
Ash Fusibility Index
AFI [°C]
S09122612301235123812421232
S10118012051215121512201207
T10116012101220122512501213
C09125013051320134513951313
C10130013401385143014701358
F09120014051430143214401410
F10120013401450145514601363
S09M125013001305131013201302
C09M1250140014401450>15001410
F09M134514451495>1500>15001466
S09L130013951440146014901408
C09L1250>1500----
F09L115013501405141014201362
S09A122013051320132513401309
S10A118512301250125512751235
T10A117513751385139014001378
C09A125013951415141514201399
C10A118514251460146014651432
F09A1030>1500----
F10A1050>1500----
Temperature ± 10 [°C].
Table 4. Evaluation of indices of slagging, fouling and bio-ash fusibility [3,10].
Table 4. Evaluation of indices of slagging, fouling and bio-ash fusibility [3,10].
SampleIndices of Slagging, Fouling and Ash Fusibility vs. DT Temperature, Index AFI, and Tsin
SiO2B/ARsFuSRTAS/ABAIDT [°C]AFI [°C]Tsin [°C]
S09252.06.97.330.93.74.50.8412301232
+++
1226
+++++++++++++++++++++++
S1035.61.08 3.13 9.9 50.5 9.26.00.3120512071180
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
T1048.90.64 1.79 8.5 64.6 7.9 7.40.35121012131160
+++++++++++++++++++++
C0917.22.83
++++
7.911.324.2 4.0 5.40.62130513131250
++ +++++++++++++++ + ++
C1021.71.99 4.18 15.3 33.3 7.7 4.80.27134013581300
++++++++++++++++++++++++
F093.216.2527.6250.25.415.42.70.1140514101200
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
F104.69.63 7.74 186.8 11.219.43.50.04134013631200
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
S09M18.52.6410.578.724.53.3 3.91.09130013021250
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
C09M12.83.7
++++
13.13
++++
13.3
++
18.7
++++
3.6 4.00.9140014101250
+++++++++++
F09M3.313.3332.0149.35.511.2 1.80.2144514661345
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
S09L16.92.8 6.827.223.62.6 4.40.85139514081300
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
C09L11.74.04 8.036.818.02.8 5.10.64>1500-1250
+++++++++++++++++++++++
F09L2.320.0 22.0 208.0 4.0 10.4 2.30.1135013621150
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
S09A16.70.74 1.55 1.8 31.12.5 0.450.84130513091220
+++++++++++++++++++++++
S10A23.70.49 0.933.0 50.5 6.2 0.60.3123012351185
+++++++++++++++++++++++
T10A32.60.34 0.65 1.8 64.4 5.3 0.860.36137513781175
+++++++++++++++++++++
C09A11.50.82 1.4 2.2 24.32.9 0.30.63139513991250
++++++++++++++++++++++
C10A14.50.68 0.953.5 33.35.2 0.40.27142514321185
+++++++++++++++++++++
F09A2.11.31 1.31 13.4 5.4 10.9 0.060.09>1500-1030
+++++++++++++++++++++
F10A3.11.02 0.51 13.3 11.313.0 0.090.04>1500-1050
+++++++++++++++++++
(+)—low; (++)—medium. (+++)—high and (++++)—extremely high probability of slagging/fouling.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vadász, P.; Plešingerová, B.; Medveď, D.; Sučik, G.; Bakajsová, R.; Petrov, V. Study of Dendromass Ashes Fusibility with the Addition of Magnesite, Limestone and Alumina. Minerals 2023, 13, 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050631

AMA Style

Vadász P, Plešingerová B, Medveď D, Sučik G, Bakajsová R, Petrov V. Study of Dendromass Ashes Fusibility with the Addition of Magnesite, Limestone and Alumina. Minerals. 2023; 13(5):631. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050631

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vadász, Pavol, Beatrice Plešingerová, Dávid Medveď, Gabriel Sučik, Radka Bakajsová, and Vladimír Petrov. 2023. "Study of Dendromass Ashes Fusibility with the Addition of Magnesite, Limestone and Alumina" Minerals 13, no. 5: 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050631

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop