Next Article in Journal
Ammonium-Bearing Fluorapophyllite-(K) in the Magnesian Skarns from Aleului Valley, Pietroasa, Romania
Next Article in Special Issue
Metamorphic Ages and PT Conditions of Amphibolites in the Diebusige and Bayanwulashan Complexes of the Alxa Block, North China Craton
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning Algorithms for Semi-Autogenous Grinding Mill Operational Regions’ Identification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tracing the Early Crustal Evolution of the North China Craton: New Constraints from the Geochronology and Hf Isotopes of Fuchsite Quartzite in the Lulong Area, Eastern Hebei Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geochronological Constraints on the Origin of the Paleoproterozoic Qianlishan Gneiss Domes in the Khondalite Belt of the North China Craton and Their Tectonic implications

1
Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
2
College of Tourism and Geographical Science, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(11), 1361; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111361
Submission received: 5 September 2023 / Revised: 20 October 2023 / Accepted: 22 October 2023 / Published: 25 October 2023

Abstract

The Paleoproterozoic gneiss domes are important structures of the Khondalite Belt in the northwestern North China Craton. However, less attention has been paid to their formation and evolution, and it thus hampers a better understanding of the deformation history of the Khondalite Belt. In this paper, we conducted structural and geochronological studies on the Qianlishan gneiss domes of the Khondalite Belt. The field observations and zircon U–Pb dating results show that the Qianlishan gneiss domes consist of 2.06–2.01 Ga granitoid plutons in the core, rimmed by granulite facies metasedimentary rocks (khondalites) of the Qianlishan Group. Both of them were subjected to two major phases of deformation (D1–D2) in the late Paleoproterozoic. Of these, D1 deformation mainly generated overturned to recumbent isoclinal folds F1 and penetrative transposed foliations/gneissosities S1 at ~1.95 Ga. Subsequently, D2 deformation produced the NW(W)–SE(E)-trending doubly plunging upright folds F2 at 1.93–1.90 Ga, and they have strongly re-oriented S1 gneissosities, giving rise to the Qianlishan gneiss domes. Combined with previous studies, we argue that the Qianlishan gneiss domes were the products of the Paleoproterozoic collisional orogenesis between the Yinshan and Ordos Blocks. Additionally, the development of doubly plunging antiforms is considered an important dome-forming mechanism in the Khondalite Belt.
Keywords: gneiss dome; zircon U–Pb dating; Paleoproterozoic; Qianlishan Complex; Khondalite Belt; North China Craton gneiss dome; zircon U–Pb dating; Paleoproterozoic; Qianlishan Complex; Khondalite Belt; North China Craton

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, H.; Deng, P.; Li, J. Geochronological Constraints on the Origin of the Paleoproterozoic Qianlishan Gneiss Domes in the Khondalite Belt of the North China Craton and Their Tectonic implications. Minerals 2023, 13, 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111361

AMA Style

Qiao H, Deng P, Li J. Geochronological Constraints on the Origin of the Paleoproterozoic Qianlishan Gneiss Domes in the Khondalite Belt of the North China Craton and Their Tectonic implications. Minerals. 2023; 13(11):1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiao, Hengzhong, Peipei Deng, and Jiawei Li. 2023. "Geochronological Constraints on the Origin of the Paleoproterozoic Qianlishan Gneiss Domes in the Khondalite Belt of the North China Craton and Their Tectonic implications" Minerals 13, no. 11: 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111361

APA Style

Qiao, H., Deng, P., & Li, J. (2023). Geochronological Constraints on the Origin of the Paleoproterozoic Qianlishan Gneiss Domes in the Khondalite Belt of the North China Craton and Their Tectonic implications. Minerals, 13(11), 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111361

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop