Next Article in Journal
Power Generation: Feedstock for High-Value Sulfate Minerals
Previous Article in Journal
Metallogenic Setting and Evolution of the Pados-Tundra Cr-Bearing Ultramafic Complex, Kola Peninsula: Evidence from Sm–Nd and U–Pb Isotopes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/min10020187
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pickeringite from the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice (the Outer Carpathians, Poland)

by
Mariola Marszałek
*,
Adam Gaweł
and
Adam Włodek
Department of Mineralogy, Petrography and Geochemistry, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2020, 10(2), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10020187
Submission received: 26 January 2020 / Revised: 16 February 2020 / Accepted: 17 February 2020 / Published: 19 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Crystallography and Physical Chemistry of Minerals & Nanominerals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pickeringite, ideally MgAl2(SO4)4·22H2O, is a member of the halotrichite group minerals XAl2(SO4)4·22H2O that form extensive solid solutions along the joints of the X = Fe-Mg-Mn-Zn. The few comprehensive reports on natural halotrichites indicate their genesis to be mainly the low-pH oxidation of pyrite or other sulfides in the Al-rich environments of weathering rock-forming aluminosilicates. Pickeringite discussed here occurs within the efflorescences on sandstones from the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice (the Polish Outer Carpathians), being most probably the first find on such rocks in Poland. This paper presents mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the pickeringite (based on SEM-EDS, XRPD, EPMA and RS methods) and suggests its possible origin. It belongs to the pickeringite–apjohnite (Mg-Mn joints) series and has the calculated formula Mg0.75Mn0.21Zn0.02Cu0.01Al2.02(S0.99 to 1.00O4)4·22H2O (based on 16O and 22H2O). The unit cell parameters refined for the monoclinic system space group P21/c are: a = 6.1981(28) Å, b= 24.2963(117) Å, c = 21.2517(184) Å and β = 100.304(65)°. The Raman spectra (SO4) bands are the intensive 994 cm−1 and a low-intensive 975 cm−1 (ν1), low-intensive 1081, 1123 and 1145 cm−1 (ν3), 524, 467 and 425cm−1 (ν2), 615 cm−1 (ν4), while those at 344 and 310 cm−1 are attributed to νg H2O and at 223 cm−1 to the lattice modes. Crystallization of pickeringite within the particular tor resulted from a certain set of conditions: climatic (e.g., season, temperature, humidity), physicochemical (e.g., pH, concentration), mineral (the presence of pyrite), and site-related (location and efflorescence protection). The sulfate ions could have been derived from oxidation of pyrite in the Ciężkowice sandstones and possibly are related to local mineral waters.

1. Introduction

Pickeringite is a hydrated double sulfate that belongs to the halotrichite mineral group. The general formula of halotrichite is XY2(SO4)4 ·22H2O, i.e., XSO4∙Y2(SO4)3·22H2O, where X is mainly Co2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+, while Y is A13+, Cr3+ and Fe3+. The minerals of the group are referred to as pseudo-alums due to their relation to the alum group minerals RY(SO4)2·12H2O, i.e., R2SO4·Y2(SO4)3·24H2O, where R represents an univalent cation such as ammonium, sodium, potassium, or cesium [1,2,3]. When a divalent cation, such as manganese, ferrous iron, cobalt, zinc or magnesium, is introduced instead of the univalent cation the, minerals form the halotrichite series that is not isomorphous with the monovalent alums. The halotrichites crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/c and are all isomorphous within their family [4,5]. In contrast to mixed crystals, halotrichites of the ideal composition, i.e., corresponding to the theoretical end-member formulae, are rare in the nature. Isomorphic substitutions result in complete solid solutions that can exist among the various end members of this mineral series.
According to the published data, mixed crystals between pickeringite MgSO4∙Al2(SO4)3·22H2O, the Mg2+ end-member of the group of halotrichites, and its Fe2+ analogue halotrichite FeSO4∙Al2(SO4)3·22H2O can exist, and such miscibility extends also towards the Mn2+ end-member apjohnite MnSO4∙Al2(SO4)3·22H2O and other known end members of the group (e.g., Zn2+ dietrichite and Co2+ one wupatkiite) [1,4,5,6,7,8].
The halotrichites originate mainly from oxidation of pyrite or other sulfides in ore deposits in aluminum-rich environments due to, for instance, weathering of rock-forming aluminosilicates under low pH conditions [2,9,10]. However, the halotrichites require both favorable local ionic activities and specific atmospheric conditions. Being highly soluble salts [6], they crystallize within open rock spaces in arid climates but in normal humid climates they cannot occur during the wetter part of the year if the rock spaces are exposed to precipitation. Under such conditions, the halotrichites can be formed in rain-protected locations such as rock niches or under overhangs.
Halotrichites may be constituents of rock efflorescences, where they are frequently found in association with other sulfates, such as alunogen Al2(SO4)3·17H2O, hydrated Mg sulfates (e.g., epsomite MgSO4·7H2O and hexahydrite MgSO4·6H2O), melanterite FeSO4·7H2O, copiapite (Fe2+,Mg)Fe3+4(SO4)6(OH)2·20H2O, K-alum KAl(SO4)2·12H2O, and gypsum CaSO4·2H2O [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. They are often found in sulfide-bearing ore mines, especially the abandoned ones, in waste dumps of such deposits [10,11,13], tailing dumps [18], coal mines and self-burning dumps of coal mining waste (e.g., [19,20,21,22]), weathered pyrite-bearing rocks such as schists, shales, lignites, gneisses (e.g., [9,12,23,24]), occasionally sandstones [25], sulfuric acid caves [26], and also in the sandstones and gneisses used as stone building materials in historical places [27,28].
Pickeringite and other halotrichite group minerals are known from a few locations in Poland, including the abandoned workings of the Staszic iron sulfide ore mine at Rudki near Nowa Słupia; the Holy Cross Mts [29,30]; menilite shales of the Carpathians [17,31]; the Poznań clays series at Dobrzyń on the Vistula River [32,33]; pyrite-bearing sericite-chlorite schists in Wieściszowice, Lower Silesia; mica schists in a quarry at Krobica, the Sudety Mts, Lower Silesia [15,16,34]; self-burning coal-mining waste dumps in the Upper and Lower Silesian Coal Basins [8,35]; and the Shale Formation in the Pieprzowe Mts [17,36,37].
The pickeringite in question was found in the efflorescences on the sandstone tors from the Stone Town Nature Reserve (further referred to as STNR) in Ciężkowice in the Outer Carpathians, Poland [38]. The paper presents comprehensive microscopic (SEM-EDS), X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), electron microprobe analysis (EPMA), and Raman microspectroscopy (RS) data to identify detailed mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the mineral and to discuss its possible genesis. According to our knowledge, it is the first detailed report on the pickeringite occurring on sandstones in Poland.

2. Geological Setting

The Stone Town Nature Reserve is located in the Ciężkowice village (49°46′36″ N, 20°57′50″ E) within the Ciężkowice Foothills (the Silesian Nappe) of the Outer Flysch Carpathians, in the eastern part of the Ciężkowice-Rożnów Landscape Park (182.47 km2) established in 1995. The STNR was already protected in 1930 and revived after the Second World War in 1974, and now it covers a surface of 0.15 km2 [39]. A remarkable geographical signature of the STNR is picturesque sandstone landforms, occupying a small area as a group of relatively large, separated from each other tors with the shapes of towers and pulpit-like rocks, scattered in a pine forest [40,41,42]. Within the reserve, there are 11 groups composed of such rocky forms ranging in height from 5 to 17 m, accompanied by many smaller forms of 3–5 m in height [43] (Figure 1). They are distributed mainly on a hill slope of the relative altitude of 100 m, that spans the area from the flood terrace of the Biała River to the extensive hill culmination (a plateau at 360 m a.s.l.).
The area of the stone town in Ciężkowice is a stratotype locality of the Upper Paleocene to Lower Eocene Ciężkowice Sandstone Formation. The thickness of this horizon reaches 350 m and the sandstone represents classical fluxoturbidites, called at present the debris flows or fan deposits [44,45,46,47]. The thick-bedded sand-and-gravel strata are exposed as single rocky forms or their groups, being more resistant to weathering than shale-and-sandstone strata of the Carpathian flysch. The Ciężkowice Sandstone occurring within the STNR form three thick lenses developed as thick-bedded (mainly 1–4 m) conglomeratic sandstones, sandstones, and conglomerates. The rocks, mainly conglomerates, contain clasts represented prevalently by claystones and, occasionally, limestones that range from one to several centimeters in size. The protected rocky landforms occur mainly as the outcrops of the stratigraphically lowermost (III) horizon of the Ciężkowice Sandstone, Early Eocene in age [43,48]. The dominating lithofacies of the IIIrd horizon are represented by the conglomeratic sandstones containing dispersed pebbles. The Sandstone Formation, cropping out in the nature reserve, is underlain by the Lower to Middle Eocene Variegated Shales and overlain by the thin-bedded shale-and-sandstone Hieroglyphic Beds of the Middle Eocene or younger shale series [43]. The shapes of the Carpathian sandstone tors mainly depend on the arrangement of joint fractures that have disintegrated the rock massif following the directions of decompressional and gravitational movements. These processes took place in the Quaternary, particularly at the very end of the Pleistocene and in the Holocene. The process of rock surface carving was continued due to selective weathering and was stimulated by the character of denudation. Differences in resistance of individual sandstones beds and their depositional differentiation are demonstrated by the rich microrelief and exposition of the hardest rocks [39,43].

3. The Ciężkowice Sandstones and their Efflorescences

The Ciężkowice sandstones are classified mainly as quartz arenites and wackes, occasionally subarcose or feldspathic wackes [45,49,50]. They are composed of quartz, feldspars (orthoclase, occasionally microcline and plagioclases, often altered to sericite and/or kaolinite), rock fragments, and micas (biotite and muscovite). Rutile, anatase, zircon, tourmaline, and opaque minerals (among them pyrite) appear as accessory phases. The cement formed by matrix and occasional carbonates is of a mixed porous-contact nature. The matrix, pigmented in places by iron (oxyhydr)oxides, contains kaolinite and illite with minor interstratified illite-smectite group of minerals. Microcrystalline quartz has also been reported as one of the matrix components [51]. Granular aggregates of glauconite occur as a minor admixture. Spherical microaggregates of pyrite framboids and/or their alteration products were sometimes observed [38,52]. The average porosity of the Ciężkowice sandstones from the Stone Town tors is 6.78% [52], reaching 12.0% in the weathered varieties [38].
The weathered surface of the sandstone tors is covered in places by hard crusts composed mainly of iron minerals (among others hematite Fe2O3 and goethite FeOOH) and various salts that may also occur in the form of very thin layers as subflorescences beneath the surface [52,53]. The salts include mainly gypsum CaSO4·2H2O and potassium alum KAl(SO4)2·12H2O, occasionally accompanied by jarosite KFe3+3(SO4)2(OH)6, barite BaSO4, and halite NaCl [30,52,54,55]. The efflorescences sometimes cover wider surfaces of the tors, as their crystallization and preservation depend on the atmospheric conditions and rock exposition. The salt associations differ in their composition, which depends on the dampness of the various sandstones they rest on or within. The dampness is in turn controlled by the position of the tors across the stream valley (bottom, slope, etc.) and the tor part (niche or rock face) where the precipitation took place [38]. The flake salt aggregates that occur on the tors exposed on the valley slopes, in the zones of recurring rock dampening and drying, contain mainly gypsum and syngenite K2Ca(SO4)2·H2O with an admixture of K-alum. The botryoidal salt accumulations from the tors with lower parts permanently damp, i.e., those located near the valley bottom immediately over the floodplain or on lower terraces, are composed mainly of alunogen Al2(SO4)3·17H2O and pickeringite MgSO4·Al2(SO4)3·22H2O with an admixture of gypsum [38]. The differing phase compositions of these two mineral parageneses result in the chemical differences among two types of the efflorescences. The sulfates mainly of calcium and potassium prevail in the first one, whereas the sulfates mainly of aluminum and aluminum-magnesium dominate in the second one, indicating possible local differences in the composition and pH of the parent solutions from which the salts precipitated.
The characteristic components of the variegated shales underlying the Ciężkowice sandstone are illite, chlorite, and quartz, as well as kaolinite, smectite, and vermiculite. Interstratified clay group of minerals, feldspars, carbonates and hematite are minor components [45].

4. Materials and Methods

The efflorescences containing pickeringite were collected during the summer period from the Ratusz (Town Hall) tor (no. 2 in Figure 1). The Ratusz tor is 12 m high and rises above the accumulation terrace of the Biała River (265 m a.s.l). The efflorescences occur in a niche (Figure 2). The rocks of the niche reveal joint fractures and, in the zone of weathering, additional finer fractures. Both types of fractures could form conduits for circulating waters from which secondary mineral phases could crystallize within the outer, weathering rock layers. The samples come from sheltered areas in the roof of the niche exposed to SW, at a height of 3 m from the tor bottom. The efflorescences have the form of white-beige, brittle, botryoidal accumulations of granules with a diameter of about 3 mm.
In addition, taking into account seasonal changes in prevailing weather conditions, we would like to check the phase composition of efflorescences forming possibly in the spring time. The samples were taken in April from the same places of the Ratusz tor niche as the summer ones. The efflorescences have the form of white, very fine-grained powder accumulations.
Laboratory investigations were focused on mineralogical and geochemical analyses of the summer efflorescences using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS) (FEI Company, Fremont, CA, USA), X-ray diffractometry (XRPD) (RIGAKU Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), and Raman microspectroscopy (RS) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The spring efflorescences were analyzed using the XRPD method only.
The samples of summer efflorescences were studied using a FEI 200 Quanta FEG scanning electron microscope with an EDS/EDAX spectrometer. The maximum excitation voltage was 20 kV and the pressure 60 Pa (the low vacuum mode). The samples were not coated and included the efflorescences and their fragments mounted in 1 inch resin discs.
The X-ray diffractometry (XRPD) studies were performed on a whole powdered samples of the efflorescence (separation of pure pickeringite from a sample was impossible because the mineral components of the samples were extremely tiny and undistinguishable) using a Rigaku Smart Lab 90 kW diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation. The diffractometer was equipped with a reflective graphite monochromator. The XRD patterns were recorded in the range of 3–72° 2θ with the step size of 0.02°, counting time of 2 s/step at a voltage of 45 kV, and current of 200 mA. Quartz from Jegłowa, Poland, was used as an internal standard. The unit cell parameters were refined for the monoclinic space group P21/c in accordance with the data of the ICDD database (card no. 46-1454) and those of Quartieri et al. [1], using the least-squares method when applying the DHN-PDS program. The calculations were made on the basis of thirteen pickeringite reflections not coinciding with the reflections of other components of the efflorescence.
Quantitative chemical analyses (electron microprobe analyses (EPMA)) were carried out using a JEOL Super Probe JXA-8230 operating in the wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDXS) mode under the following conditions: an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, a beam current of 1 nA, a beam size of 7–10 μm, a peak count time of 20 s, and background time of 10 s. The EPMA operating conditions, standards, and detection limits are contained in Table 1. The Jeol ZAF procedure was used for the matrix correction of the raw data. Atomic contents of the formulae of pickeringite were calculated on the basis of 16 oxygen atoms per formula unit (apfu) with the assumed presence of 22 water molecules pfu. For the EPMA analyses, fragments of the efflorescence were mounted in 1 inch resin discs, polished using oil and coated with carbon.
The Raman spectra were recorded using a Thermo Scientific DXR Raman microscope with a 900 grooves/mm grating and a CCD detector. The Olympus 10× (NA 0.25) and 50× (NA 0.50) objectives (theoretical spot sizes 2.1 μm and 1.1 μm, respectively) were used. The sample was excited with a 532-nm laser with the maximum power of 10 mW. The laser power varied in the 3–10 mW range, selected to obtain spectra of the best quality. The spectra were recorded at an exposure time of 3 s and the number of exposures varied from 10 to 100. The spectra identification was performed using an in-house and the RRUFF Raman Minerals spectral libraries as well as some literature data [2,3,7]. The band component analysis was undertaken using the Omnic software package, which enables the type fitting function to be selected and allows specific parameters to be fixed or varied accordingly. Band fitting was carried out using a Gauss-Lorentz cross product function with the minimum number of component bands used for the fitting process.

5. Results

5.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM-EDS)

Pickeringite crystals found as one of the components of the white-beige summer efflorescence in the form of botryoidal aggregates occur in a complex mixture with other sulfates. The mineral paragenesis is represented mainly by alunogen Al2(SO4)3·17H2O, with an admixture of gypsum CaSO4·2H2O. Pickeringite forms aggregates of very fine and thin acicular crystals, not exceeding several hundred μm in length (Figure 3a). According to EDS analyses, they are composed of Mg, Al, S, and O with traces of Mn but without Fe, thus corresponding to the Mg-Mn joints rather than to Mg-Fe ones of halotrichites [2,3,4,10]. The flake crystals are composed of Al, S, and O only and represent alunogen Al2(SO4)3·17H2O (Figure 3a,b). The elemental composition of the prismatic crystals includes Ca, S, and O, so the habit and chemistry clearly identify gypsum.

5.2. X-Ray Diffractometry (XRPD)

The XRPD patterns recorded for powdered samples of the summer efflorescences reveal the presence of salt mixtures: alunogen Al2(SO4)3·17H2O, pickeringite MgSO4·Al2(SO4)3·22H2O (solid solution pickeringite-apjohnite), and traces of gypsum (Figure 4).
Two rare sulfates were identified based on the following data: alunogen, the ICDD database card no. 26-1010, and pickeringite, the ICDD database card no. 46-1454 and from Quartieri et al. [1]. However, some positions of X-ray reflections and their intensities are similar to apjohnite, card no. 29-0886; gypsum was identified based on the ICDD card no. 33-311. The presence of a reflection at 15.8 Å can be assigned, according to Quartieri et al. [1] to pickeringite, although the ICDD card no. 46-1454 of this phase does not quote this reflection. Therefore, this reflection could also suggest the presence of zaherite Al12(SO4)5(OH)26·20H2O but in its dehydrated form (ICDD 29-0088). However, its identification in the efflorescences is very tentative because zaherite gives only one strong reflection 15.8 Å while three other reflections are weak and do not exceed an intensity of 8 in the relative 1–100 scale [56].
The unit cell parameters of pickeringite from STNR, refined for the monoclinic system space group P21/c, are as follows: a = 6.1981 (28) Å, b = 24.2963 (117) Å, c = 21.2517(184) Å, β = 100.304 (65)°, V = 3148.7 Å3.
The XRPD patterns of the spring efflorescences do not reveal the presence of pickeringite. The material consists of hydromagnesite Mg5[(CO3)4(OH)2]∙4H2O with admixtures of hexahydrite MgSO4∙6H2O and gypsum (Figure 5). These minerals were identified based on the following ICDD database cards: hydromagnesite, no. 25-513; hexahydrite, no. 24-719; and gypsum, no. 33-311. Quartz present in the samples comes from a parent rock and was identified based on the ICDD card no. 33-1161.

5.3. Chemical Analyses (EPMA)

The general formula of the halotrichite group is XY2(SO4)4·22H2O, where X is divalent (mainly Co2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+) and Y is trivalent (Al3+, Cr3+ and Fe3+) cations [1,5]. In this study, Fe has been calculated as FeO, so the total quantity of Fe has been assigned to the X site, indicating that the Y site is filled with Al3+ only (2.02 apfu on average) (Table 2). The X site is dominated by Mg (0.75 apfu on average) with an admixture of Mn (0.21 apfu on average). Other elements, Fe2+ and Cu, occur in traces (≤0.01 apfu on average) and Zn in minor amounts (0.02 apfu on average). The studied STNR pickeringite has the calculated formula Mg0.75Mn0.21Zn0.02Cu0.01Al2.02(S0.99 to 1.00O4)4·22H2O. The presence of Na (Na2O 0.25 wt. % on average), K (K2O 0.05 wt. % on average), Ba (BaO 0.04 wt. % on average), Sr (SrO 0.07 wt. % on average), and Ca (CaO 0.05 wt. % on average) is problematic. These elements probably come from neighboring minerals (e.g., gypsum) and/or thin clay material from the efflorescences, and they were passed over in the formula.
The compositional variations of the pickeringite analyses (Table 2) are also presented in Figure 6 and confirm that the sulfate belongs to the pickeringite–apjohnite series.

5.4. Raman Microspectroscopy (RS)

The spectra in the region of 950–1000 cm−1 (Figure 7) display the strong band at 994 cm−1 assigned to the ν1 (SO4) symmetric stretching mode. The second, low-intensity band at 975 cm−1 is assigned also to the ν1 (SO4) mode. The bands in the region of 1000–1250 cm−1 are of very low intensities. Those at 1081, 1123, and 1145 cm−1 have been assigned to the ν3 (SO4) anti-symmetric stretching mode (Figure 7). The bands in the low-wave number region (Figure 8) are located at 524, 467, 425 cm−1 and have been assigned to the ν2 bending mode. The ν4 (SO4) mode is suggested for the band at 615 cm−1. Bands at 344 and 310 cm−1 can be attributed to the νg H2O and 223 cm−1 to the lattice modes.
The OH stretching region contains a broad band with a very low intensity between 2700 and 3500 cm−1 (Figure 9). Its more characteristic bands at 3012, 3275, and 3394 cm−1 have been assigned to the ν3 OH stretching mode of H2O. The identification of the Raman spectra is reported in Table 3.

6. Discussion and Concluding Remarks

6.1. Chemical Characteristics and Unit Cell Parameters of Pickeringite

Extensive isomorphism in the halotrichite group minerals along the Fe-Mg-Mn-Zn joints and the similarity of their structures have been studied by Ballirano [5]. The unit cell parameters of the STNR pickeringite with the calculated formula Mg0.75Mn0.21Zn0.02Cu0.01Al2.02(S0.99 to 1.00O4)4·22H2O, determined on the basis of X-ray powder patterns, has been compared with the data of synthetic Mg-Mn joints and other available literature data on natural halotrichites enriched in Mn (Figure 10) [1,4,8,16]. The results of the unit-cell refinement are in good agreement with those from the literature and confirm a close similarity between the structures of apjohnite and pickeringite. A replacement in the pickeringite structure of Mg2+ ions by Mn2+ (Mn → Mg) with the ionic radii rMn2+ = 0.83 Å vs rMg2+ = 0.72 Å (according to Shannon, vide [5]) and atomic masses 54.93 vs 24.30 u, respectively, results in a nearly linear increase of the a, b, and c unit cell parameters and a decrease in the β angle [5].
The crystal structure of the pseudo-alums that crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/c contains four non-equivalent SO4 tetrahedra. One of the tetrahedra is bound to the divalent cation, and the other three are involved in complex hydrogen-bond arrays involving coordinated water molecules to both cations and to the lattice water molecules [1,4,5,59] (the crystallographical structure of halotrichite can be found at http://webmineral.com/data/Halotrichite.shtml). A substantial linearity between the mean bond distance [Me2+]VI–H2O(O) and the mean ionic radius of the cation occupying the Me2+ position (calculated based on % of ions in the structure) has also been observed [5]. The change of the bond lengths and bounding strengths among the divalent cation, the sulfate anion, and water [60] must be reflected in the shift of Raman bands.

6.2. Spectroscopic Characteristics

The Raman spectra of alums are based on a combination of the spectra of the sulfate ions and water. The sulfate is typically a tetrahedral oxyanion with bands at 981 (ν1), 451 (ν2), 1104 (ν3), and 613 (ν4) cm−1 [2,3]. If the symmetry of the SO42− group is distorted, which results in differences in S–O the bond lengths, multiple vibration bands may exist [2,3,60]. In the structure of halotrichites, each of four crystallographically independent sulfate ions should reveal its individual Raman spectrum [2,4]. In the ν1 SO4 symmetric stretching region both the bands assigned to the sulfates coordinated to the divalent cation and the sulfates in the hydration sphere of aluminum should be present [2,7]. Based on relative intensities of these two band types, the higher wavenumber band (with higher intensity) is assigned to a trivalent cation (described as caused by the sulfates in the water hydration sphere of Al), the lower wavenumber band (with lower intensity) to the divalent cation (described as caused by the sulfates coordinated to the divalent cation) [2,7]. However, in most of the Raman spectra of pseudo-alums recorded at room temperature (298 K) and reported in the literature, a coincidence of the bands results in fewer bands than expected or only a slight asymmetry (a shoulder) of the band is observed [2,7]. Better separation of these bands can reveal spectra at 77 K [2]. In the case of the STNR pickeringite (whose spectra were registered at room temperature only), the band at 994 cm−1 assigned to ν1 (SO4) does not reveal any shoulder (Figure 7) that helps separate additional bands assigned to the Me2+ and Me3+ cations in the mineral structure. The position of the SO42− band at 994 cm−1 corresponds to that determined by Locke et al. [7], but the Raman spectra obtained by them reveal two overlapping bands. Another band in this region has been assigned followed Ross [2,7] to water librational mode, and is also similar to that obtained by Locke et al. [7]. The Raman band positions and their assignments of pickeringite and apjohnite specimens of various origin and localization are shown in Table 3.
The number of bands observed in the ν3 (SO4) region should reflect the number of sulfate anions in the primitive cell, however the spectra in this region are often of not high quality because of their low intensity and/or high background [7]. The STNR pickeringite shows in this region the weak bands at 1145, 1123 and 1081 cm−1 (Figure 7, Table 3). In the low frequency region ν2 three bands are observed at 524, 467 and 425 cm−1 (Figure 8, Table 3). The ν4 mode is ascribed to a single band at 615 cm−1 showing no shoulder (Figure 8). The number of bands in respect to ν2, ν3 and ν4 modes is in good agreement with the data of Locke et al. [7] (Table 3) for natural Fe-Mg pickeringite (Fe0.22Mg0.78). The observed number of bands in the Raman spectra at 298 K confirms the supposition that symmetry of sulfate is reduced.
The Raman spectra of the halotrichites in the OH stretching region depend on the mineral composition, however the RS is not very sensitive to the measurement of water in minerals [7]. In case of pickeringite from the STNR, its OH stretching region shows a complex band of a very low intensity. The positions of its components slightly differ from those given in the literature (Table 3).
Pickeringite is known to form continuous solid solutions not only with halotrichite but also with apjohnite. Possibilities of extensive isomorphism, and similarity of the structures result in close unit cell parameters of these minerals. However, a replacement of Mg2+ by Mn2+ (of various ionic radii and atomic masses) must somehow affect unit cell parameters and the Raman spectra [5]. As a result, even minor differences of the crystal structure change bond lengths and bounding strengths between the divalent cation, the sulfate anion and water [60]. However, based on available but scarce data regarding the halotrichites of the Mg-Mn joints [2,3,4,7], no clear and simple trend was observed to draw conclusions on the position of the Raman bands associated with the Mn → Mg replacement. The variation of the Raman spectrum with increasing substitution of Mn2+ for Mg2+ needs to be further explored.

6.3. Possible Origin

Pickeringite co-existing with alunogen and gypsum is a secondary mineral, found in the efflorescences of the rain-protected niche in the Ratusz (Town Hall) tor of the stone town (STNR) in Ciężkowice. Minerals of the halotrichite group usually precipitate at a low pH (2–4.5) and a high saturation of parent solutions [9,61]. These highly hydrated minerals are also characterized by a significant water solubility, so their occurrence in a moderately moist climate depends on weather conditions. Their occurrence is limited to summer periods with humidity not too high but remaining at a sufficient level ensuring the crystallization of the mineral which theoretically contains ~46% H2O. Such conditions are met, e.g., in a niche which shelters the minerals from dissolving. They occur in the Ratusz (Town Hall) tor, located slightly above the floodplain of the Biała River and permanently damp in its lower parts. The tor position provides enough moisture for the crystallization of highly hydrated salts such as pickeringite and coexisting alunogen during the summer period.
However, despite the seasonal or temporal changes of the prevailing atmospheric conditions (temperature, humidity), salt efflorescences still form there, but their mineral composition also changes. In the early spring (April) at about 12 °C, hydromagnesite Mg5[(CO3)4(OH)2]∙4H2O is the predominant component, while hexahydrite MgSO4∙6H2O and gypsum are admixtures. These efflorescences appear in the same place as pickeringite in the summer period, and occur in the vicinity of and along the fractures, which may point to a significant role of water solutions migrating through the rock mass.
Generally, the environment where hydromagnesite currently precipitates is characterized by high pH and high Mg/Ca ratios [62,63,64]. It is by far the most common, naturally occurring mineral phase belonging to the group of hydrated Mg-carbonates (i.e., containing hydroxyl groups) of the MgO-CO2-H2O system [63,64]. This may be explained by the high hydration energy of the Mg2+ cation that prevents the formation of anhydrous MgCO3 phases. Globally the hydromagnesite occurrences are linked to weathering of magnesium-rich rocks, lacustrine, or marine precipitates and alkaline wetlands, but also bricks and mortars and even weathered meteorites [62,63].
The presence of hydromagnesite that crystallizes under a clearly alkaline pH, while pickeringite precipitates in acid environments, indicates a strong variability of the environmental parameters depending on the seasonal weather conditions. At times when highly acid conditions prevail, pickeringite and alunogen (the latter also needs low pH) form, but if acid sulfate-bearing solutions are diluted by rain falls, snow, fog etc., these two phases become unstable and dissolve, whereas the increasing pH values stabilize other phases, e.g., hydromagnesite.
The presence of sulfate ions and low pH values in the range of 2–4.5 favored eventually the crystallization of pickeringite [9,10,11,16]. The generation of the sulfate ions was ensured by the oxidation of pyrite, which is corroborated by frequent goethite pseudomorphs after iron sulfide in the surface rock layers of the Ratusz tor (Figure 11). The crystallization of various sulfate salts within this particular tor is thus controlled by a set of necessary conditions of a climatic (e.g., season, temperature, humidity), physicochemical (e.g., pH, concentration), mineralogical (the presence of pyrite), and site-related (location and protection of efflorescences) nature.
Thus, if the rocks of other tors do not contain enough pyrite, the whole chain of the events mentioned cannot even start and pickeringite never precipitates. The same will happen if the rock is not damp enough, which depends on the tor position across the river valley and an elevation of the water table [38] etc.
In turn, the Ciężkowice sandstones are carbonate-free or very low in carbonates, thus there are no buffer minerals that can reduce the acidity of the rock environment. For this reason, a lower pH of pore solutions within these rocks is maintained for a longer time. Under such conditions a range of aluminosilicate minerals decompose and liberate cations of aluminium, magnesium, and manganese forming later the Al-rich salts, i.e., pickeringite and alunogen, of the efflorescences. In case of the Ratusz tor sandstone, such minerals include the mica group, mainly biotite, and feldspars (plagioclases). Kaolinite, illite, glauconite, as well a small amount of the interstratified illite-smectite group minerals identified in the matrix of the Ciężkowice sandstones, can also provide these cations [38,51,52].
Another source of the pickeringite- and alunogen-forming ions may be represented by waters circulating in the rocks from different levels of the Carpathian flysch. This problem has been discussed in detail by Alexandrowicz and Marszałek [38]. The Ciężkowice Foothills is the region characterized by sulfurous spring waters [65] containing H2S, whose presence is explained as its being a product of pyrite (FeS2) decomposition during weathering [66]. This mineral is rather a common but minor component of the Carpathian flysch strata [45]. However, as the sandstone complexes with a high permeability prevail in the geological structure of the Ciężkowice Foothills, they form conduits of possible mixing of waters of various provenience and from various circulation horizons. So, the origin of sulfur of the efflorescences could be traced back either to a direct transformation of pyrite into secondary minerals or to waters enriched in hydrogen sulfide. In both cases it means that pyrite contained in the sandstones of the Carpathian flysch, including the Ciężkowice sandstones, is the initial source of sulfur.
The presence of sulfate secondary minerals is often attributed to a direct impact of the polluted atmosphere and the air precipitations contaminating groundwater (e.g., [67,68,69,70]). Although the reports on the quality of the environment near the Ciężkowice area have not identified hazards caused by excessive sulfur, the possible contribution of the air pollution cannot be ruled out, mainly due to its long-term impact [38]. Nevertheless, in the case of the Ratusz tor, the role of this source in crystallization of pickeringite should be considered as marginal.
Isotopic analyses could put the light on the problem of identifying sources of sulfur taking part in formation of pickeringite and other sulfate-bearing efflorescences from the Stone Town Nature Reserve. A respective complementary research program is planned as a follow-up of the investigations presented here.

Author Contributions

M.M. supplied the samples, performed SEM-EDS and RS analyses and their interpretation, recalculated EPMA analyses, wrote the text, prepared most of the figures, and suggested the origin of the mineralization; A.G. performed the XRPD studies, calculated unit cell parameters, and prepared some figures; A.W. performed the EPMA analyses. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The studies were supported by the AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, grant 16.16.140.315.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank A. Skowroński for his help in language corrections. We would like to thank both anonymous Reviewers for their comments helpful in improving the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Quartieri, S.; Triscari, M.; Viani, A. Crystal structure of the hydrated sulphate pickeringite (MgAl2(SO4)4 22H2O): X-ray powder diffraction study. Eur. J. Miner. 2000, 12, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Frost, R.L.; Kloprogge, J.T.; Williams, P.A.; Leverett, P. Raman microscopy of some natural pseudo-alums: Halotrichite, apjohnite and wupatkiite, at 298 and 77 K. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2000, 31, 1083–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palmer, S.; Frost, R.L. Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of apjohnite and pickingerite. Polyhedron 2006, 25, 3379–3386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Menchetti, S.; Sabelli, C. The halotrichite group: The crystal structure of apjohnite. Mineral. Mag. 1976, 40, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ballirano, P. Crystal chemistry of the halotrichite group XAl2(SO4)4·22H2O: The X = Fe-Mg-Mn-Zn compositional tetrahedron. Eur. J. Miner. 2006, 18, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hammarstrom, J.M.; Smith, K.S. Geochemical and mineralogical characterization of solids and their effects on waters in metal-mining environments. In Progress on Geoenvironmental Models for Selected Mineral Deposit Types; Seal, R.R., II, Foley, N.K., Eds.; US Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-195; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2002; pp. 9–54. [Google Scholar]
  7. Locke, A.J.; Martens, W.N.; Frost, R.L. Natural halotrichites-an EDX and Raman spectroscopic study. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2007, 38, 1429–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kruszewski, Ł. Supergene sulphate minerals from the burning coal mining dumps in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, South Poland. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2013, 105, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parnell, R.A., Jr. Weathering processes and pickeringite formation in a sulfidic schist: A consideration in acid precipitation neutralization studies. Environ. Geol. 1983, 4, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hammarstrom, J.M.; Seal, R.R., II; Meier, A.L.; Kornfeld, J.M. Secondary sulfate minerals associated with acid drainage in the eastern, US: Recycling of metals and acidity in surficial environments. Chemic. Geol. 2005, 215, 407–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Farkas, I.M.; Weiszburg, T.G.; Pekker, P.; Kuzmann, E. A half-century of environmental mineral formation on a pyrite-bearing waste dump in the Mátra mountains, Hungary. Can. Mineral. 2009, 47, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mladenova, V.; Dimitrova, D.; Schmitt, R.F. Efflorescent minerals formed during intensive weathering of phyllites, Chiprovtsi ore district, Northwestern Bulgaria. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Bulgarian Geological Society (Geosciences-2007), Sofia, Bulgaria, 13–14 December 2007; pp. 63–64. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gomes, P.; Valente1, T.; Grande, J.A.; Cordeiro, M. Occurrence of sulphate efflorescences in São Domingos mine. Comun. Geológicas 2017, 104, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin, R.; Rodgers, K.A.; Browne, P.R.L. The nature and significance of sulphate-rich, aluminous efflorescences from the Te Kopia geothermal field, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Mineral. Mag. 1999, 63, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parafiniuk, J. Fibroferrite, slavikite and pickeringite from the oxidation zone of pyrite-bearing schists in Wieściszowice (Lower Silesia). Mineral. Pol. 1991, 22, 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  16. Parafiniuk, J. Sulphate minerals and their origin in the weathering zone of the pyrite-bearing schist at Wieściszowice (Rudawy Janowickie Mts., Western Sudetes, Poland). Acta Geol. Pol. 1996, 46, 353–414. [Google Scholar]
  17. Naglik, B.; Natkaniec-Nowak, L. Pickeringite from the Pieprzowe Mts. (the Holy Cross Mts., Central Poland). Geol. Geoph. Environ. 2015, 41, 114–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Jambor, J.L.; Nordstrom, D.K.; Alpers, C.N. Metal-sulfate salts from sulfide mineral oxidation. In Sulfate Minerals Crystalography, Geochemistry and Environmental Significance; Alpers, C.N., Jambor, J.L., Nordstrom, D.K., Eds.; Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry; Mineralogical Society of America, Geochemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2000; Volume 40, pp. 303–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Blass, G.; Strehler, H. Mineralbildungen in einer durch Selbstentzündung brennenden Bergehalde des Aachener Steinkohlenreviers. Miner. Welt 1993, 4, 35–42. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  20. Bouška, V.; Dvořák, Z. Minerals of the North Bohemian Lignite Basins; Nakl.: Dick, Praha, 1997; pp. 1–159. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  21. Jírasek, J. Thermal Changes of the Rocks in the Dump Pile of the Kateřina Colliery in Radvanice (Eastern Bohemia); VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Institute of Geological Engineering: Ostrava, Czechia, 2001; Volume 541, p. 69. [Google Scholar]
  22. Szakáll, S.; Kristály, F. Ammonium sulphates from burning coal dumps at Komló and Pécs-Vasas, Mecsek Mts., South Hungary. Mineral. Spec. Papers 2008, 32, 155. [Google Scholar]
  23. Brant, R.A.; Foster, W.R. Magnesian Halotrichite from Vinton County, Ohio. Ohio J. Sci. 1959, 59, 187–192. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vorma, A. Sulfide-bearing mica gneiss containing pickeringite. Bull. Comm. Geol. Finlinde 1966, 38, 51–53. [Google Scholar]
  25. Suchý, V.; Sýkorová, I.; Zachariáš, J.; Filip, J.; Machovič, V.; Lapčák, L. Hypogene Features in Sandstones: An Example from Carboniferous Basins of Central and Western Bohemia, Czech Republic. In Hypogene Karst Regions and Caves of the World; Klimchouk, A.W., Palmer, A., De Waele, J., Auler, A.S., Audra, P., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lazaridis, G.; Melfos, V.; Papadopoulou, L. The first cave occurrence of orpiment (As2S3) from the sulfuric acid caves of Aghia Paraskevi (Kassandra Peninsula, N. Greece). Int. J. Speleol. 2011, 40, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sulovsky, P.; Gregerova, M.; Pospisil, P. Mineralogical Study of Stone Decay in Charles Bridge, Prague. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on the Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Berlin, Germany, 30 September–4 October 1996; Riederer, J., Ed.; Möller Druck und Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1996; pp. 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  28. Küng, A.; Zehnder, K. Pickeringite: A deleterious salt on buildings. Stud. Conserv. 2017, 62, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wieser, T. Siarczanowe produkty wietrzenia na złożu żelaza Gór Świętokrzyskich. Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 1949, 19, 445–477. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  30. Kubisz, J. Studies of supergene sulphate minerals occurring in Poland. Prace Geol. 1964, 26, 1–76. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  31. Biłoniżka, P.M. O pochodzeniu mioceńskich soli potasowo-magnezowych Przedkarpacia. Prz. Geol. 1996, 44, 1029–1031. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  32. Gajdówna, E. Gips i Towarzyszące mu Minerały w Dobrzyniu Nad Wisłą; Muzeum Ziemi: Warszawa, Poland, 1952; p. 6. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  33. Mazur, L. Rentgenograficzno-chemiczne badania siarczanowych produktów wietrzenia pirytu występującego w Dobrzyniu nad Wisłą. Stud. Soc. Sci. Tor. 1962, IV, 2. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  34. Parafiniuk, J. Sulphate weathering minerals from the mica schist quarry in Krobica (West Sudeten, SW Poland). Prz. Geol. 1994, 7, 536–538. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  35. Ciesielczuk, J.; Kruszewski, Ł.; Fabiańska, M.J.; Misz-Kennan, M.; Kowalski, A.; Mysza, B. Efflorescences and gas composition emitted from the burning coal-waste dump in Słupiec, Lower Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. In Proceedings of the International Symposium CEMC 2014, Skalský Dvůr, Czech Republic, 23–26 April 2014; pp. 26–27. [Google Scholar]
  36. Naglik, B.; Heflik, W.; Natkaniec-Nowak, L. Charakterystyka mineralogiczno-petrograficzna utworów klastycznych Gór Pieprzowych (Wyżyna Sandomierska) i produktów ich wietrzenia. Prz. Geol. 2016, 64, 338–343. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  37. Naglik, B.; Natkaniec-Nowak, L.; Heflik, W. Mineral assemblages as a record of the evolutionary history of the Pepper Mts. Shale Formation (the Holy Cross Mts.). Geol. Geoph. Envir. 2016, 42, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Alexandrowicz, Z.; Marszałek, M. Efflorescences on weathered sandstone tors in the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice the Outer Carpathians, Poland-their geochemical and geomorphological controls. Envir. Sci. Poll. Res. 2019, 26, 37254–37274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alexandrowicz, Z. Sandstone rocky forms in Polish Carpathians attractive for education and tourism. Prz. Geol. 2008, 56, 680–687. [Google Scholar]
  40. Alexandrowicz, Z. Sandstone tors of the Western Flysch Carpathians. Pr. Geol. Kom. Nauk Geol. PAN 1978, 113, 87. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  41. Alexandrowicz, Z. Inanimate nature in the Czarnorzecki Landscape Park. Ochr. Przyr. 1987, 45, 263–293. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  42. Alexandrowicz, Z. Rezerwaty i pomniki przyrody nieożywionej województwa krośnieńskiego. In System Ochrony Przyrody i Krajobrazu Województwa Krośnieńskiego; Michalik, S., Ed.; Studia Naturae B: Kraków, Poland, 1987; Volume 32, pp. 23–72. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  43. Alexandrowicz, Z. Sandstone rocks in the vicinity of Ciężkowice on the Biała River. Ochr. Przyr. 1970, 35, 281–335. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  44. Cieszkowski, M.; Koszarski, A.; Leszczyński, S.; Michalik, M.; Radomski, A.; Szulc, J. Detailed Geological Map of Poland 1:50 000 Sheet Ciężkowice; Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny: Warszawa, Poland, 1991. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  45. Leszczyński, S. Ciężkowice Sandstones of the Silesian Unit in the Polish Carpathians: A study of coarse-clastic sedimentation in the deep-water. Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 1981, 51, 435–502. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  46. Koszarski, L. Observation on the Sedimentation of the Ciężkowice sandstone near Ciężkowice (Carpathian Flysch). Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. 1956, 3, 393–398. [Google Scholar]
  47. Leszczyński, S. Characteristics and origin of flxoturbidites from the Carpathian flysch (Cretaceous–Palaeogene). South Poland. Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 1989, 59, 351–390. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jurkiewicz, H. Foraminifers in the sub-Menilitic Paleogene of the Polish Middle Carpathians. Inst. Geol. Biul. 1967, 210, 5–128. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  49. Pettijohn, F.J.; Potter, P.E.; Siever, R. Sand and Sandstone; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  50. Leszczyński, S.; Dziadzio, P.S.; Nemec, W. Some current sedimentological controversies in the Polish Carpathian flysch. In Proceedings of the Guidebook for Field Trips Accompanying 31st IAS Meeting of Sedimentology Held in Kraków, Kraków, Poland, 22–25 June 2015; Haczewski, G., Ed.; Polish Geological Society: Kraków, Poland, 2015; pp. 247–287. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bromowicz, J.; Górniak, K.; Przystaś, G.; Rembiś, M. Wyniki badań petrograficznych typowych litofacji zbiornikowych fliszu karpackiego. In Charakterystyka Parametrów Petrofizycznych Fliszowych Serii Ropogazonośnych Karpat Polskich; Kuśmierek, W., Ed.; Polish Journal of Mineral Resources: Kraków, Poland, 2001; Volume 4, pp. 31–75. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  52. Alexandrowicz, Z.; Marszałek, M.; Rzepa, G. Distribution of secondary minerals in crusts developed on sandstone exposures. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2014, 39, 320–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alexandrowicz, Z.; Marszałek, M.; Rzepa, G. The role of weathering crust in the Evolution of surfaces on the Carpathian sandstone tors. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojczystą 2012, 68, 163–174, (In Polish with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  54. Alexandrowicz, Z.; Pawlikowski, M. Mineral crust of the surface weathering zone of sandstone tors in the Polish Carpathians. Mineral. Pol. 1982, 13, 41–59. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilczyńska-Michalik, W. Influence of Atmospheric Pollution on the Weathering of Stones Monuments in Cracow and Rock Outcrops in Cracow, Cracow-Częstochowa Upland and the Carpathians; Prace Monograficzne 377 Akademia Pedagogiczna: Kraków, Poland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ruotsala, A.P.; Babcock, L.L. Zaherite, a new hydrated aluminum sulfate. Am. Mineral. 1977, 62, 1125–1128. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ross, S.D. Sulphates and other oxy-anions of Group VI. In V.C. In The Infrared Spectra of Minerals; Farmer, V.C., Ed.; The Mineralogical Society: London, UK, 1974; pp. 423–444. [Google Scholar]
  58. Griffith, W.P. Advances in Raman and infrared spectroscopy of minerals. In Spectroscopy of Inorganic-Based Materials; Clark, R.J.H., Hester, R.E., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1987; pp. 119–186. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hawthorn, F.C.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Burns, P.C. The crystal chemistry of sulfate minerals. In Sulfate Minerals-Crystallography, Geochemistry, and Environmental Significance; Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 40; Alpers, C.N., Jambor, J.L., Nordstrom, D.K., Eds.; Mineralogical Society of America: Washington, DC, USA, 2000; pp. 1–112. [Google Scholar]
  60. Palmer, S.; Frost, R.L. Molecular structure of Mg–Al, Mn–Al and Zn–Al halotrichites-type double sulfates—An infrared spectroscopic study. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2011, 78, 1633–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Alpers, C.N.; Blowes, D.W.; Nordstrom, D.K.; Jambor, J.L. Secondary minerals and acid mine-water chemistry. In Short Course Handbook on Environmental Geochemistry of Sulphide Mine Wastes; Jambor, J., Blowes, D., Eds.; Mineralogical Association of Canada: Waterloo, ON, Canada, 1994; pp. 247–270. [Google Scholar]
  62. Frost, R.L. Raman spectroscopic study of the magnesium carbonate mineral hydromagnesite (Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2.·4H2O). J. Raman Spectrosc. 2011, 42, 1690–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hopkinson, L.; Kristova, P.; Rutt, K.; Cressey, G. Phase transitions in the system MgO–CO2–H2O during CO2 degassing of Mg-bearing solutions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 76, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gautier, Q.; Bénézeth, P.; Mavromatis, V.; Schott, J. Hydromagnesite solubility product and growth kinetics in aqueous solution from 25 to 75 °C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2014, 138, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rajchel, J.; Marszałek, M.; Rajchel, L. Deposits of sulphurous spring waters from the Carpathians and the Carpathian Foredeep (southern Poland). Prz. Geol. 2000, 48, 1174–1180. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  66. Rajchel, L.; Zuber, A.; Duliński, L.; Rajchel, J. Izotope and chemical composition and water ages of sulphide springs in the Polish Carpathians. In Współczesne Problem Hydrogeologii; Sadurski, A., Krawiec, A., Eds.; UMK Toruń: Toruń, Poland, 2005; Volume 12, pp. 583–588. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  67. Přikryl, R.; Melounová, L.; Vařilová, Z.; Weishauptová, Z. Spatial relationships of salt distribution and related physical changes of underlying rocks on naturally weathered sandstone exposures (Bohemian Switzerland National Park, Czech Republic). Environ. Geol. 2007, 52, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Přikryl, R.; Svobodová, J.; Žák, K.; Hradil, D. Anthropogenic origin of salt crusts on sandstone sculptures of Prague’s Charles Bridge (Czech Republic): Evidence of mineralogy and stable isotope geochemistry. Eur. J. Miner. 2004, 16, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schweigstillová, J.; Přikryl, R.; Novotná, M. Isotopic composition of salt efflorescence from the sandstone castellated rocks of the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic). Environ. Geol. 2009, 58, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Navrátil, T.; Vařilová, Z.; Rohovec, J. Mobilization of aluminum by the acid percolates within unsaturated zone of sandstones. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 7115–7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 10 00187 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of the sandstone tors on the geological map of the Stone Town Nature Reserve (STNR), Ciężkowice area (after [43,44,45], modified). Quaternary deposits: 1, alluvial clays; 2, alluvial and deluvial loams. Paleogene flysch sequences: 3, Hieroglyphic Beds (green shales and sandstones); 4, Ciężkowice Sandstones (conglomeratic sandstones, sandstones, conglomerates); 5, Variegated and Red Shales (shales); 6, Upper Istebna Shales (shales); 7, fault.
Figure 1. Distribution of the sandstone tors on the geological map of the Stone Town Nature Reserve (STNR), Ciężkowice area (after [43,44,45], modified). Quaternary deposits: 1, alluvial clays; 2, alluvial and deluvial loams. Paleogene flysch sequences: 3, Hieroglyphic Beds (green shales and sandstones); 4, Ciężkowice Sandstones (conglomeratic sandstones, sandstones, conglomerates); 5, Variegated and Red Shales (shales); 6, Upper Istebna Shales (shales); 7, fault.
Minerals 10 00187 g001
Minerals 10 00187 g002 550
Figure 2. The Ratusz (Town Hall) tor in the STNR (a,b; for location details see Figure 1—tor 2), and the niche with white-beige pickeringite efflorescences marked in (b).
Figure 2. The Ratusz (Town Hall) tor in the STNR (a,b; for location details see Figure 1—tor 2), and the niche with white-beige pickeringite efflorescences marked in (b).
Minerals 10 00187 g002
Minerals 10 00187 g003 550
Figure 3. Back scattered electron (BSE) images of the components of the botryoidal efflorescences (a,b). Abbreviations: Aln, alunogen; Gp, gypsum; Pic, pickeringite.
Figure 3. Back scattered electron (BSE) images of the components of the botryoidal efflorescences (a,b). Abbreviations: Aln, alunogen; Gp, gypsum; Pic, pickeringite.
Minerals 10 00187 g003
Minerals 10 00187 g004 550
Figure 4. Characteristic X-ray patterns of the summer-formed efflorescences from the Ratusz tor (a) and the pickeringite reflections used for the refining unit cell parameters (b). Abbreviations: Aln, alunogen; Gp, gypsum; Pic, pickeringite; Qz, quartz; Zhr, zaherite.
Figure 4. Characteristic X-ray patterns of the summer-formed efflorescences from the Ratusz tor (a) and the pickeringite reflections used for the refining unit cell parameters (b). Abbreviations: Aln, alunogen; Gp, gypsum; Pic, pickeringite; Qz, quartz; Zhr, zaherite.
Minerals 10 00187 g004
Minerals 10 00187 g005 550
Figure 5. Characteristic X-ray patterns of the spring formed efflorescences from the Ratusz tor. Abbreviations: Gp, gypsum; Hex, hexahydrite; Hmg, hydromagnesite; Qz, quartz.
Figure 5. Characteristic X-ray patterns of the spring formed efflorescences from the Ratusz tor. Abbreviations: Gp, gypsum; Hex, hexahydrite; Hmg, hydromagnesite; Qz, quartz.
Minerals 10 00187 g005
Minerals 10 00187 g006 550
Figure 6. Compositional variation of the STNR pickeringite (mol. %) plotted in the Mg-Mn+Zn+Cu-Fe diagram [10].
Figure 6. Compositional variation of the STNR pickeringite (mol. %) plotted in the Mg-Mn+Zn+Cu-Fe diagram [10].
Minerals 10 00187 g006
Minerals 10 00187 g007 550
Figure 7. Raman spectra of the STNR pickeringite in the 950–1250 cm−1 region.
Figure 7. Raman spectra of the STNR pickeringite in the 950–1250 cm−1 region.
Minerals 10 00187 g007
Minerals 10 00187 g008 550
Figure 8. Raman spectra of the STNR pickeringite in the 200–700 cm−1 region.
Figure 8. Raman spectra of the STNR pickeringite in the 200–700 cm−1 region.
Minerals 10 00187 g008
Minerals 10 00187 g009 550
Figure 9. Raman spectra of the STNR pickeringite: stretching OH vibrations in the 2700–3500 cm−1 region.
Figure 9. Raman spectra of the STNR pickeringite: stretching OH vibrations in the 2700–3500 cm−1 region.
Minerals 10 00187 g009
Minerals 10 00187 g010 550
Figure 10. Unit cell parameters of the STNR pickeringite compared to literature data [1,4,5,8,16]. Explanations: 1–4, synthetic Mg-Mn joints of the following compositions: 1, Mg1.00Mn0.00; 2, Mg0.75Mn0.25; 3, Mg0.50Mn0.50; 4, Mg0.25Mn0.75; 5, Mg0.00Mn1.00 [5]; natural specimens: 6, pickeringite from the STNR [this study]; 7, pickeringite from Czerwionka (Poland) [8]; 8, pickeringite from Roccalumera (Italy) [1]; 9, apjohnite from Terlano (Italy) [4]; 10, pickeringite from Wieściszowice (Poland) [16].
Figure 10. Unit cell parameters of the STNR pickeringite compared to literature data [1,4,5,8,16]. Explanations: 1–4, synthetic Mg-Mn joints of the following compositions: 1, Mg1.00Mn0.00; 2, Mg0.75Mn0.25; 3, Mg0.50Mn0.50; 4, Mg0.25Mn0.75; 5, Mg0.00Mn1.00 [5]; natural specimens: 6, pickeringite from the STNR [this study]; 7, pickeringite from Czerwionka (Poland) [8]; 8, pickeringite from Roccalumera (Italy) [1]; 9, apjohnite from Terlano (Italy) [4]; 10, pickeringite from Wieściszowice (Poland) [16].
Minerals 10 00187 g010
Minerals 10 00187 g011 550
Figure 11. Back scattered electron (BSE) images of the characteristic goethite pseudomorphs after pyrite from the weathered part of the Ratusz tor sandstone.
Figure 11. Back scattered electron (BSE) images of the characteristic goethite pseudomorphs after pyrite from the weathered part of the Ratusz tor sandstone.
Minerals 10 00187 g011
Table
Table 1. Electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) conditions for the STNR pickeringite analysis.
Table 1. Electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) conditions for the STNR pickeringite analysis.
ElementSignalWDXS CrystalCalibrantDetection Limit [ppm] 1
NaKαTAPalbite1780
SiKαTAPalbite1260
PKαPETfluorapatite3150
MnKαLIFrhodonite4510
FeKαLIFfayalite 2000
SrLαPETcelestine3850
CuKαLIFcuprite2780
KKαPETsanidine470
BaLαPETbarite1350
CaKαPETdiopside530
ZnKαLIFwillemite3000
AlKαTAPalbite1600
PbMαPETcrocoite2900
SKαPETanhydrite2260
MgKαTAPdiopside1260
1 Detection limit were determined by using JEOL software for 3σ confidence level.
Table
Table 2. Representative chemical compositions of the STNR pickeringite.
Table 2. Representative chemical compositions of the STNR pickeringite.
Analysis Number20313235Averagesd
wt. %
SO336.4936.3336.3537.1436.580.38
P2O50.030.110.030.000.040.05
Al2O311.6411.8712.2211.6511.850.27
CuO0.000.060.110.130.080.06
ZnO0.180.390.200.100.220.11
SrO0.000.000.060.230.070.11
MnO2.311.501.751.121.670.50
FeO0.070.000.050.000.030.03
CaO0.060.070.010.080.050.03
BaO0.080.000.070.000.040.04
MgO3.263.503.513.733.500.19
Na2O0.000.630.140.210.250.27
K2O0.020.050.060.070.050.02
H2O *45.3145.5645.6645.9145.610.25
Total99.44100.01100.23100.36100.010.41
Apfu **
S6+3.993.973.954.023.980.03
P5+0.000.010.000.000.000.00
∑3.993.983.954.023.980.02
Al3+2.002.042.081.982.020.04
∑Y2.002.042.081.982.020.04
Cu2+0.000.010.010.010.010.01
Zn2+0.020.040.020.010.020.01
Mn2+0.290.190.220.140.210.05
Fe2+0.010.000.010.000.000.00
Mg2+0.710.760.760.800.750.03
∑X1.031.001.020.961.000.03
H2O2222222222
sd—standard deviation. * calculated from stoichiometry. ** calculated on the basis of 16 O atoms per formula unit (apfu) with the presence of 22 H2O molecules pfu
Table
Table 3. The Raman bands with their assignments for pickeringite and apjohnite (natural and synthetic samples).
Table 3. The Raman bands with their assignments for pickeringite and apjohnite (natural and synthetic samples).
Raman Bands (cm−1)
PickeringiteApjohnite 1Apjohnite 2Pickeringite 2Apjohnite 3Pickeringite 4Assignments 5
This StudyFrost et al. [4]Palmer & Frost [3]Locke et al. [7]
339434903554350635483449OH stretch ν3 (Bg) H2O
34863437
327533943404328934263279OH stretch ν3 (Ag) H2O
301234903282 32703082
32813175 OH stretch ν1 H2O
32813053
29252900
1658 ν2 (Bg) H2O
1620 ν2 (Ag) H2O
11451113 1145ν3 (Ag) SO4
112311481141109611471114
10811088 10861071ν3 (Bg) SO4
107010801058
1051 1031
994997995984985996ν1 (Ag) SO4
991990971
975975975 975
963
615617618611622621ν4 (Bg) SO4
459 ν4 (Au) SO4 or νϒ (Bg) H2O
524530 445 530ν2 (Ag) SO4
467466474366467468
425427460
423 443424
344336 364344νg (Ag) H2O
310313 315
264 251247
223 204233214221lattice modes
173167
154151
141
112
1 Terlano, Boltzano, Italy; composition: Mn0.642+Mg0.28Zn0.06Fe0.02 (after [4]). 2 synthetized; compossition: pure (after [3]). 3 Terlano, Italy; composition: Mn0.642+Mg0.28Zn0.08 (after [7]). 4 San Bernardino, California; composition: Fe0.222+Mg0.78 (after [7]). 5 Band assignment follows [2,3,57,58].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marszałek, M.; Gaweł, A.; Włodek, A. Pickeringite from the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice (the Outer Carpathians, Poland). Minerals 2020, 10, 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10020187

AMA Style

Marszałek M, Gaweł A, Włodek A. Pickeringite from the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice (the Outer Carpathians, Poland). Minerals. 2020; 10(2):187. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10020187

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marszałek, Mariola, Adam Gaweł, and Adam Włodek. 2020. "Pickeringite from the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice (the Outer Carpathians, Poland)" Minerals 10, no. 2: 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10020187

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop