Next Article in Journal
Stability of Cu-Sulfides in Submarine Tailing Disposals: A Case Study from Repparfjorden, Northern Norway
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding Mineral Liberation during Crushing Using Grade-by-Size Analysis—A Case Study of the Penuota Sn-Ta Mineralization, Spain
Open AccessArticle

Geochemistry and Geochronology of Southern Norilsk Intrusions, SW Siberian Traps

A.P. Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute, Sredny prospect, 74, 199106 St.Petersburg, Russia
Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kosygin st., 119991 Moscow, Russia
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2020, 10(2), 165;
Received: 25 November 2019 / Revised: 5 February 2020 / Accepted: 8 February 2020 / Published: 13 February 2020
The Norilsk ore region is characterized by the occurrence of numerous intrusions comprising the PGE–Cu–Ni deposits. The Turumakit area, within the Southern Norilsk Trough, also contains many mineralized mafic intrusions of probably similar economic potential to the known Norilsk deposits. We study igneous rocks from three boreholes within the Turumakit area, sampling gabbro-dolerites and trachydolerites related to the Norilsk and Ergalakh complexes, as well as an outcrop of the Daldykan gabbro-dolerite intrusion. Our petrographical, mineralogical and geochemical data, as well as the U–Pb dating of extracted baddeleyites and zircons, primarily discriminate between the sub-alkaline rocks of the main Turumakit area and the Ergalakh trachydolerites located in the Norilsk and Talnakh ore junctions. Coarser grained Turumakit trachydolerites (with pegmatite segregations) contrast finer grained Ergalakh trachydolerites by having: (1) higher TiO2 (up to 5.5 wt %) compared with 2.2 wt %–3.3 wt % in the typical Ergalakh rocks; (2) low U, lower La/Yb and La/Sm ratios (5–7), in contrast to 8–10 ppm, 2.5–2.6 and 3.0–3.3, respectively, for the Ergalakh trachydolerites; and (3) their age was determined by U–Pb methods on baddeleyite and zircon (244.8 ± 2.7 Ma), and it appears likely that the mafic rocks traditionally attributed to the Ergalakh complex within the Turumakit area are younger than the Norilsk intrusions (250 ± 1.4 Ma). These data strongly indicate an emplacement of Turumakit intrusions during the end of a ~5 Myr magmatic evolution of the Norilsk district. It is therefore proposed that the sub-alkaline rocks of the Turumakit area belong to a separate intrusive complex within the Norilsk district. View Full-Text
Keywords: Norilsk area; Siberian traps; sub-alkaline and mafic intrusions; U–Pb baddeleyite ages Norilsk area; Siberian traps; sub-alkaline and mafic intrusions; U–Pb baddeleyite ages
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sereda, E.; Belyatsky, B.; Krivolutskaya, N. Geochemistry and Geochronology of Southern Norilsk Intrusions, SW Siberian Traps. Minerals 2020, 10, 165.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop