Next Article in Journal
Dual-Band Asymmetry-Guided Long-Range Cat-Eye Recognition with Multi-Scale Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Performance of Programming Languages in Mathematical Biology: A Ten-Language Evaluation Across Six Modeling Regimes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

From Commutation to Modal Symmetry: Half-Cycle Symmetry, Detuning Duality, and Symmetry Breaking in LLC Resonant DC–DC Converters

1
Centre of Excellence “National Center of Mechatronics and Clean Technologies”, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Computer Systems, Faculty of Computer Systems and Technologies, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
Symmetry 2026, 18(9), 1561; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091561 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 August 2026 / Revised: 13 September 2026 / Accepted: 16 September 2026 / Published: 18 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Section C: Physics)

Abstract

Inductor–inductor–capacitor (LLC) resonant converters can produce nearly symmetric waveforms without achieving low-loss switching. This paper separates these properties, using a common framework for a resonant circuit containing two inductive elements and one capacitor. An analytical gain model is combined with a time-domain model that distinguishes positive secondary conduction, an open secondary circuit, and negative secondary conduction. The framework compares the two switching half-cycles, their conduction sequences, the gain at reciprocal normalized frequencies, and the current available for zero-voltage switching (ZVS). Finite magnetizing inductance breaks reciprocal gain symmetry, while a balanced converter can retain close half-cycle correspondence. Controlled bridge, timing, and rectifier asymmetries increase the waveform mismatch. Independent LTspice checks reproduce three representative mode families and agree with the low-order gain within 0.45–3.55%. They also confirm that a high-gain operating point can fail ZVS despite good waveform symmetry. Highlighted current paths, a datasheet-informed semiconductor-loss budget, and input/output ripple spectra connect the descriptors to practical design questions. The loss estimates are conditional analytical scenarios, and the filtering study uses a separate coupled reduced-order model. The framework supports reproducible design screening; it does not replace detailed device simulation or hardware validation.
Keywords: LLC resonant converter; half-cycle symmetry; modal symmetry; P/O/N modes; reciprocal detuning; zero-voltage switching; circulating energy; LTspice validation; reproducibility; tolerance analysis LLC resonant converter; half-cycle symmetry; modal symmetry; P/O/N modes; reciprocal detuning; zero-voltage switching; circulating energy; LTspice validation; reproducibility; tolerance analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hinov, N. From Commutation to Modal Symmetry: Half-Cycle Symmetry, Detuning Duality, and Symmetry Breaking in LLC Resonant DC–DC Converters. Symmetry 2026, 18, 1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091561

AMA Style

Hinov N. From Commutation to Modal Symmetry: Half-Cycle Symmetry, Detuning Duality, and Symmetry Breaking in LLC Resonant DC–DC Converters. Symmetry. 2026; 18(9):1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091561

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hinov, Nikolay. 2026. "From Commutation to Modal Symmetry: Half-Cycle Symmetry, Detuning Duality, and Symmetry Breaking in LLC Resonant DC–DC Converters" Symmetry 18, no. 9: 1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091561

APA Style

Hinov, N. (2026). From Commutation to Modal Symmetry: Half-Cycle Symmetry, Detuning Duality, and Symmetry Breaking in LLC Resonant DC–DC Converters. Symmetry, 18(9), 1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091561

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop