Next Article in Journal
Association Between Gait Lower Limb Intra and Interlimb Coordination and Fear of Falling and Falling History in Older Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Robust 3D Multi-Image Encryption Scheme Based on Rubik’s Cube–Poker Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Optimization of Phase Masks: Integrating Non-Iterative Methods with Simulated Annealing and Validation via Tomographic Measurements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Dynamic State Equations and Distributed Blockchain Control: A Differential Game Model for Optimal Emission Trajectories in Shipping Networks

1
School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3
School of Business and Management, Shanghai Urban Construction Vocational College, Shanghai 201415, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2025, 17(6), 817; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060817
Submission received: 7 April 2025 / Revised: 14 May 2025 / Accepted: 21 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry and Asymmetry Study in Graph Theory)

Abstract

The shipping industry, a cornerstone of global trade, faces emissions reduction challenges amid tightening environmental policies. Blockchain technology, leveraging distributed symmetric architectures, enhances supply chain transparency by reducing information asymmetry, yet its dynamic interplay with emissions strategies remains underexplored. This study employs symmetry-driven differential game theory to model four blockchain scenarios in port-shipping networks: no blockchain (N), port-led (PB), shipping company-led (CB), and a joint platform (FB). By solving Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations, we derive optimal emissions reduction efforts, green investments, and blockchain strategies under symmetric and asymmetric decision-making frameworks. Results show blockchain adoption improves emissions reduction and service quality under cost thresholds, with port-led systems maximizing low-cost profits and shipping firms gaining asymmetrically in high-freight contexts. Joint platforms achieve symmetry in profit distribution through fee-trust synergy, enabling win–win outcomes. Integrating graph-theoretic principles, we have designed dynamic state equations for emissions and service levels, segmenting shippers by low-carbon preferences. This work bridges dynamic emissions strategies with blockchain’s network symmetry, fostering economic–environmental synergies to advance sustainable maritime supply chains.
Keywords: distributed blockchain; shipping networks; differential game; symmetric architectures; emissions reduction; dynamic state equations distributed blockchain; shipping networks; differential game; symmetric architectures; emissions reduction; dynamic state equations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Z.; Xi, Y.; Shi, B.; Liu, J. Dynamic State Equations and Distributed Blockchain Control: A Differential Game Model for Optimal Emission Trajectories in Shipping Networks. Symmetry 2025, 17, 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060817

AMA Style

Sun Z, Xi Y, Shi B, Liu J. Dynamic State Equations and Distributed Blockchain Control: A Differential Game Model for Optimal Emission Trajectories in Shipping Networks. Symmetry. 2025; 17(6):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Zhongmiao, Yike Xi, Baoli Shi, and Jinrong Liu. 2025. "Dynamic State Equations and Distributed Blockchain Control: A Differential Game Model for Optimal Emission Trajectories in Shipping Networks" Symmetry 17, no. 6: 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060817

APA Style

Sun, Z., Xi, Y., Shi, B., & Liu, J. (2025). Dynamic State Equations and Distributed Blockchain Control: A Differential Game Model for Optimal Emission Trajectories in Shipping Networks. Symmetry, 17(6), 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop