Next Article in Journal
A Novel Two-Lane Lattice Model Considering the Synergistic Effects of Drivers’ Smooth Driving and Aggressive Lane-Changing Behaviors
Next Article in Special Issue
Applications of a q-Integral Operator to a Certain Class of Analytic Functions Associated with a Symmetric Domain
Previous Article in Journal
Symmetric and Asymmetric Allocating Concepts Under Multiple-Goals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Attributes of Subordination of a Specific Subclass of p-Valent Meromorphic Functions Connected to a Linear Operator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On λ-Pseudo Bi-Starlike Functions Related to Second Einstein Function

by
Alaa H. El-Qadeem
1,*,
Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy
2,
Borhen Halouani
3,
Ibrahim S. Elshazly
4,
Kaliappan Vijaya
2 and
Mohamed A. Mamon
5
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
2
School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India
3
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Basic Sciences, Common First Year Deanship, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2024, 16(11), 1429; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111429
Submission received: 24 September 2024 / Revised: 12 October 2024 / Accepted: 25 October 2024 / Published: 27 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Geometric Theory of Analytic Functions)

Abstract

:
A new class B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) of bi-starlike λ -pseudo functions related to the second Einstein function is presented in this paper. c 2 and c 3 indicate the initial Taylor coefficients of ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , and the bounds for | c 2 | and | c 3 | are obtained. Additionally, for ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , we calculate the Fekete–Szegö functional.
MSC:
30C45; 30C50

1. Introduction

Consider the set A of all functions of the series notation
ϕ ( η ) = η + m = 2 c m η m ,
defined in the open unit disc D = { η : η C and | η | < 1 } , assume these functions are analytic. Additionally, let S A , and if ϕ S , then ϕ is univalent with ϕ ( 0 ) = 0 = ϕ ( 0 ) 1 .
We say that an analytic function ϕ is subordinate to an analytic function ψ if there exists an analytic function ω in D such that ω ( 0 ) = 0 , | ω ( η ) | < 1 for | η | < 1 and ϕ ( η ) = ψ ( ω ( η ) ) . Specifically, in the event that ψ is univalent in D , the corresponding equivalency is as follows:
ϕ ( η ) ψ ( η ) ϕ ( 0 ) = ψ ( 0 ) and ϕ ( | η | < 1 ) ψ ( | η | < 1 ) .
For starlike functions of order ν , the class S * ( ν ) is a significant and well-studied subclass of S . It is defined by the following condition
Re η ϕ ( η ) ϕ ( η ) > ν , ( 0 ν < 1 ; η D ) ,
and the class of convex functions of order ν in K ( ν ) S , is defined by condition
Re 1 + η ϕ ( η ) ϕ ( η ) > ν , ( 0 ν < 1 ; η D ) .
The set B λ ( ν ) of λ -pseudo-starlike functions of order ν were given and studied by Babalola [1]. If ϕ A , then ϕ B λ ( ν ) if
Re η ( ϕ ( η ) ) λ ϕ ( η ) > ν , ( 0 ν < 1 ; η D ) .
It was demonstrated in [1] that all pseudo-starlike functions are univalent in open unit disc D and Bazilevič of type 1 1 / λ with order ν 1 / λ .
We consider the set P to be the collection of all analytic functions h : D C satisfying the conditions h ( 0 ) > 0 , h is univalent with Re ( h ( η ) ) > 0 , h ( D ) is starlike with respect to 1, and h ( D ) is symmetric about a real axis.
In the field of computation sciences, symmetry is essential, particularly in geometric function theory. We use the expression
Φ ( z ) = 1 + A z 1 + B z ,
where 1 B < A 1 , to illustrate this role. Convex in kind, Φ transfers the open unit U conformally onto a disc symmetrical with respect to the real axis. The disc has a radius equal to A B 1 B 2   ( B ± 1 ) and is centered at the point 1 A B 1 B 2   ( B ± 1 ) . Additionally, the disc’s boundary circle crosses the real axis at 1 A 1 B and 1 + A 1 + B , which yields B ± 1 . Great research opportunities in the field of geometric function theory were made possible by this symmetric function. We refer the reader to Janowski’s 1973 introduction of the well-known starlike and convex functions criteria (see [2]).
z f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 + A z 1 + B z ,
and
1 + z f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 + A z 1 + B z .
The cosine function [3], secant function [4], balloon function [5], and many other symmetric functions are the subject of several investigations. In this paper, we applied the symmetry of a certain Einstein function. The preliminaries of Einstein functions are given in this section.
Gradshteyn and Ryzhik [6] gave the formula defining Bernoulli polynomials in 1980. These polynomials have important applications in number theory and classical analysis. They may be found in the integral representation of differentiable periodic functions since they are used to approximate such functions in terms of polynomials. They are also used in the expression of the remainder term of the unified Euler–MacLaurin quadrature rule.
The generating function is typically used to define the Bernoulli polynomials b m ( y ) (see, e.g., [7]).
G ( y , t ) : = t e y t e t 1 = m = 0 b m ( y ) m ! t m , 0 < | t | < 2 π ,
Recursion is a simple method for computing the Bernoulli polynomials, since
j = 0 m 1 m j b j ( y ) = n y m 1 , m = 2 , 3 ,
The initial Bernoulli polynomials are
b 0 ( y ) = 1 , b 1 ( y ) = y 1 2 , b 2 ( y ) = y 2 y 1 6 , b 3 ( y ) = y 3 3 2 y 2 + 1 2 y ,
Moreover, by substituting y = 0 in Bernoulli polynomials, one may directly obtain Bernoulli numbers b m : = b m ( 0 ) . Among the initial Bernoulli numbers are
b 0 = 1 , b 1 = 1 2 , b 2 = 1 6 , and b 2 m + 1 = 0 , m = 1 , 2 , .
Additionally, the so-called Einstein function E ( η ) may be used to construct Bernoulli numbers b m , as follows:
E ( η ) : = η e η 1 = m = 0 b m m ! η m .
Every one of the following functions might occasionally be called the Einstein function (see [8,9]):
E 1 ( η ) : = η e η 1 , E 2 ( η ) : = η 2 e η e η 1 2 , E 3 ( η ) : = log 1 e η , E 4 ( η ) : = η e η 1 log 1 e η .
The range of E 2 , is symmetric around the x-axis and starlike w.r.t. η = 1 ( E 2 is convex) and Re E 2 ( η ) > 0 η D . It is evident that both functions E 1 and E 2 have these properties, but E 3 and E 4 do not (see Figure 1).
The series forms of E 1 and E 2 are
E 1 ( η ) = 1 + m = 1 b m m ! η m , a n d E 2 ( η ) = 1 + m = 1 ( 1 m ) b m m ! η m ,
such that b m refers to the Bernoulli numbers.
Einstein function E 1 has been the subject of various results introduced by El-Qadeem et al. [10]. El-Qadeem et al. [11] have also applied the Einstein function E 2 to introduce various results.
Here, we employ E 2 to define a novel subclass of pseudo bi-Starlike functions. Note that E 2 ( 0 ) 0 (indeed E 2 ( 0 ) = 0 ), i.e., E 2 P . Thus, a modified version of the Einstein function E κ is defined for this purpose.
E κ ( η ) : = E 2 ( η ) + κ η ,
where κ I : = [ 0.28 , 0.92 ] . Then E κ ( D ) is a convex domain, symmetric about the x-axis and starlike w.r.t. η = 1 and Re E κ ( η ) > 0 η D , moreover, E κ ( 0 ) = κ > 0 . This illustrates that E κ P .
Example 1.
(i)
If κ < 0.28 , then E 2 ( η ) + κ η is not a convex function, see Figure 2a;
(ii)
If κ > 0.92 , then η D s.t. Re E 2 ( η ) + κ η 0 , see Figure 2b;
(iii)
If 0.28 κ 0.92 , then Re E 2 ( η ) + κ η > 0 η D , also E 2 ( η ) + κ η is a convex function, see Figure 2c.
Every univalent function ϕ S of the shape (1) is known to have an inverse ϕ 1 ( w ) defined in | w | < r 0 ( ϕ ) ; r 0 ( ϕ ) 1 4 where
ψ ( w ) = ϕ 1 ( w ) = w c 2 w 2 + 2 c 2 2 c 3 w 3 5 c 2 3 5 c 2 c 3 + c 4 w 4 +
A function ϕ S is bi-univalent in D if there exists a function ψ S such that ψ ( η ) is a univalent extension of ϕ 1 to D . Σ is a representation of the class of bi-univalent functions in D . The class Σ includes the functions
η 1 η , log ( 1 η ) a n d 1 2 log 1 + η 1 η ,
(details in [12]). But the well-known Koebe function is not bi-univalent. A bound | c 2 |   1.51 was found by Lewin [13] while studying the class of bi-univalent functions σ . Inspired by Lewin’s [13] research, Brannan and Clunie [14] hypothesised that | c 2 |   2 . The coefficient estimation problem ([12]) for | c m | ( m N , m 3 ) still requires further effort. Brannan and Taha [15] provided estimates for the initial coefficients of numerous subclasses of the bi-univalent function class Σ . Many types of bi-univalent functions have been introduced and studied recently; bi-univalent function study has benefited greatly from the work of Srivastava et al. [12]. Many researchers who recently investigated a large number of important subclasses of the class Σ were motivated by this, as they found non-sharp estimates on the first two Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients (see [12,16,17,18,19], and the references cited therein).
Furthermore, Joshi et al. [20] recently described a unique class of bi-pseudo-starlike functions and discovered bounds for the initial coefficients | c 2 | and | c 3 | . This study uses the second Einstein function. In order to determine the bounds for the initial coefficients of | c 2 | and | c 3 | for ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , we define and study the class B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) . We also discussed the Fekete–Szegö problem in this article.
Definition 1.
Given ϕ Σ where ( ϕ ( η ) ) λ ( λ 1 ) is analytic in D such that ( ϕ ( 0 ) ) λ = 1 . Moreover, let ψ be an extension of ϕ 1 to D where ( ψ ( η ) ) λ is analytic in D with ( ψ ( 0 ) ) λ = 1 . Then ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) of λ-bi-pseudo-starlike functions if each of the below circumstances holds true:
η ( ϕ ( η ) ) λ ( 1 γ ) η + γ ϕ ( η ) E κ ( η ) ( η D ) ,
and
w ( ψ ( w ) ) λ ( 1 γ ) w + γ ψ ( w ) E κ ( w ) ( w D ) ,
where 0 γ 1 .
Remark 1.
If λ = 1 , then ϕ Σ is in the class B Σ 1 ( γ , κ ) M Σ ( γ , κ ) if both of the subsequent two criteria are fulfilled:
η ϕ ( η ) ( 1 γ ) η + γ ϕ ( η ) E κ ( η ) ,
and
w g ( w ) ( 1 γ ) w + γ ψ ( w ) E κ ( w ) ,
where η , w D and ψ is expressed by (6).
Remark 2.
If λ = 1 ; γ = 1 , then ϕ Σ is in the class B Σ 1 ( 1 , κ ) S Σ , κ * if both of the subsequent two criteria are fulfilled:
η ϕ ( η ) ϕ ( η ) E κ ( η ) ,
and
w g ( w ) ψ ( w ) E κ ( w ) ,
where η , w D and ψ is expressed by (6).
Remark 3.
If γ = 0 , then ϕ Σ is in the class B Σ λ ( 0 , κ ) R Σ , κ λ if the following conditions are satisfied:
( ϕ ( η ) ) λ E κ ( η ) a n d ( ψ ( w ) ) λ E κ ( w ) ,
where η , w D and ψ is expressed by (6).
Remark 4.
For λ = 1 ; γ = 0 , then ϕ Σ is in the class B Σ 1 ( 0 ) N Σ , κ if both of the subsequent two criteria are fulfilled:
ϕ ( η ) E κ ( η ) a n d ψ ( w ) E κ ( w ) ,
where η , w D and ψ is expressed by (6).

2. Coefficient Estimates for ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ )

Unless otherwise mentioned, we let λ 1 , 0 γ 1 , κ [ 0.28 , 0.92 ] , and η , ω D . Also, we recall the following lemmas:
Lemma 1
([21,22]). Let l 1 , l 2 R and p 1 , p 2 C . If | p 1 | , | p 2 | < ζ , then
( l 1 + l 2 ) p 1 + ( l 1 l 2 ) p 2 2 | l 1 | ζ , | l 1 | | l 2 | , 2 | l 2 | ζ , | l 1 | | l 2 | .
Lemma 2
([23]). Assume that on the unit open disc D , χ ( η ) is analytic, and χ ( 0 ) = 0 . | χ ( η ) | < 1 , also
χ ( η ) = ρ 1 η + m = 2 ρ m η m f o r a l l η D ,
then
| ρ 1 | 1 , and | ρ m | 1 | ρ 1 | 2 m N { 1 } .
Theorem 1.
Let ϕ ( η ) given in (1). If ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , then
| c 2 | min { κ 2 λ γ ; 2 κ | 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | + 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ } ,
| c 3 | 2 κ 3 λ γ , 2 ( 2 λ γ ) κ ( 3 λ γ ) 1 , 2 κ ( 3 λ γ ) 4 ( 2 λ γ ) Λ ( λ , γ , κ ) ( 3 λ γ ) + 2 κ 3 λ γ , 2 ( 2 λ γ ) κ ( 3 λ γ ) < 1 ,
where
Λ ( λ , γ , κ ) = | 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | + 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ .
Proof. 
Let ψ be of the form
ψ ( w ) = w c 2 w 2 + 2 c 2 2 c 3 w 3 5 c 2 3 5 c 2 c 3 + c 4 w 4 + .
Since ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , there exist analytic functions u , v : D D , with u ( 0 ) = 0 = v ( 0 ) , such that | u ( η ) | < 1 , | v ( η ) | < 1 , given by
u ( η ) = m = 1 p m η m , and v ( ω ) = m = 1 q m ω m ,
Through straightforward calculation, we get
( 19 ) κ u ( η ) + E 2 ( u ( η ) ) = 1 + κ u ( η ) ( u ( η ) ) 2 12 + ( u ( η ) ) 4 240 + ( 20 ) = 1 + κ p 1 η + κ p 2 p 1 2 12 η 2 + ,
and
( 21 ) κ v ( ω ) + E 2 ( v ( ω ) ) = 1 + κ v ( ω ) ( v ( ω ) ) 2 12 + ( v ( ω ) ) 4 240 + ( 22 ) = 1 + κ q 1 ω + κ q 2 q 1 2 12 ω 2 + .
η [ ϕ ( η ) ] λ ( 1 γ ) η + γ ϕ ( η ) = κ u ( η ) + E 2 ( u ( η ) ) ,
w [ ψ ( w ) ] λ ( 1 γ ) w + γ ψ ( w ) = κ v ( ω ) + E 2 ( v ( ω ) ) .
However, we have
η [ ϕ ( η ) ] λ ( 1 γ ) η + γ ϕ ( η )
= 1 + ( 2 λ γ ) c 2 η + [ 2 λ 2 2 λ ( γ + 1 ) + γ 2 c 2 2 + ( 3 λ γ ) c 3 ] η 2 + ,
and
w [ ψ ( w ) ] λ ( 1 γ ) w + γ ψ ( w )
= 1 ( 2 λ γ ) c 2 w + [ 2 λ 2 + ( 2 λ γ ) ( 2 γ ) c 2 2 ( 3 λ γ ) c 3 ] w 2 + .
Using (19), (21), (25) and (26) and comparing the like coefficients of η and η 2 , we get
( 2 λ γ ) c 2 = κ p 1 ,
2 λ 2 2 λ ( γ + 1 ) + γ 2 c 2 2 + ( 3 λ γ ) c 3 = κ p 2 p 1 2 12 ,
( 2 λ γ ) c 2 = κ q 1 ,
2 λ 2 + ( 2 λ γ ) ( 2 γ ) c 2 2 ( 3 λ γ ) c 3 = κ q 2 q 1 2 12 .
From (27) and (29), we find that
c 2 = κ p 1 2 λ γ = κ q 1 2 λ γ ;
it follows that
p 1 = q 1 ,
and
2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 c 2 2 = κ 2 ( p 1 2 + q 1 2 ) .
Thus,
c 2 2 = κ 2 ( p 1 2 + q 1 2 ) 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 ( o r ) p 1 2 + q 1 2 = 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ 2 c 2 2 ( o r ) p 1 2 = ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ 2 c 2 2 .
Also,
| c 2 | 2 κ 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 , | c 2 | κ 2 λ γ .
Adding (28) and (30), we have
4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) c 2 2 = κ ( p 2 + q 2 ) 1 12 p 1 2 + q 1 2 .
Substituting (31) and (33) in (35), we get
4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) c 2 2 = κ ( p 2 + q 2 ) κ 2 6 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 c 2 2 , 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 c 2 2 = κ ( p 2 + q 2 ) , 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | c 2 | 2 = 2 κ ( 1 | p 1 | 2 ) , { 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 + 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ } | c 2 | 2 = 2 κ .
Hence,
c 2 2 = 2 κ | 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | + 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ .
Applying Lemma 2 in (37),
| c 2 | 2 κ | 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | + 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ ,
we get the desired inequality (17).
Subtracting (28) from (30), and using (33), we obtain
c 3 = c 2 2 + κ ( p 2 q 2 ) 2 ( 3 λ γ ) ( 38 ) = c 2 2 + κ ( p 2 q 2 ) 2 ( 3 λ γ ) , | c 3 | 1 2 ( 2 λ γ ) κ ( 3 λ γ ) | c 2 | 2 + 2 κ 3 λ γ ( 39 ) = 2 κ ( 3 λ γ ) 4 ( 2 λ γ ) Λ ( λ , γ , κ ) ( 3 λ γ ) + 2 κ 3 λ γ ,
where
Λ ( λ , γ , κ ) = | 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | + 2 ( 2 λ γ ) 2 κ .
By virtue of (37), the result is obtained. Again, by (31), we have p 1 2 = q 1 2 and applying Lemma 2, the required inequality is obtained by using (38). The proof of Theorem 1 is therefore fulfilled. □
By the restriction λ = 1 , then we consider the next corollary:
Corollary 1.
Let ϕ in (1). If ϕ M Σ ( γ , κ ) , then
| c 2 | min { κ 2 γ ; 2 κ | 4 + 2 ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | + 2 ( 2 γ ) 2 κ } ,
| c 3 | 2 κ 3 γ , 2 ( 2 γ ) κ ( 3 γ ) 1 , 2 κ ( 3 γ ) 4 ( 2 γ ) Λ ( 1 , γ , κ ) ( 3 γ ) + 2 κ 3 γ , 2 ( 2 γ ) κ ( 3 γ ) < 1 ,
where
Λ ( 1 , γ , κ ) = | 4 + 2 ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 γ ) 2 6 κ 2 | + 2 ( 2 γ ) 2 κ .
By the restriction λ = 1 = γ , then we consider the next corollary:
Corollary 2.
Let ϕ be the function expressed in (1). If ϕ B Σ 1 ( 1 , κ ) S Σ , κ * , then
| c 2 | min { κ ; 2 κ 2 + 1 6 κ 2 + 2 κ } , | c 3 | 2 κ , 1 κ 1 , 2 ( κ 1 ) 2 + 1 6 κ 2 + 2 κ + κ , 1 κ < 1 ,
By taking λ = 1 and γ = 0 , we have the following:
Corollary 3.
Let ϕ expressed in (1). If ϕ N Σ , κ , then
| c 2 | min { κ 2 ; 2 κ 6 + 2 3 κ 2 + 8 κ } ,
| c 3 | 2 κ 3 , 4 3 κ 1 , 6 κ 8 3 6 + 2 3 κ 2 + 8 κ + 2 κ 3 , 4 3 κ < 1 .
By taking γ = 0 , we have the following:
Corollary 4.
Let ϕ expressed in (1). If ϕ R Σ , κ λ , then
| c 2 | min { κ 2 λ ; 2 κ 4 λ 2 + 2 λ + 2 λ 2 3 κ 2 + 8 λ 2 κ } ,
| c 3 | 2 κ 3 λ , 4 3 κ 1 , 6 κ 8 3 4 λ 2 + 2 λ + 4 λ 2 6 κ 2 + 8 λ 2 κ + 2 κ 3 λ , 4 3 κ < 1 .

3. Fekete–Szegö Problem of B Σ λ ( γ , κ )

For the function class B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , we give the Fekete–Szegö functional, by using the values of c 2 2 and c 3 , inspired by the latest research of Zaprawa [21,22].
Theorem 2.
Let δ C . If ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , then
| c 3 δ c 2 2 | 2 κ | Θ ( λ , γ , κ ) | , | Θ ( λ , γ , κ ) | | 1 2 ( 3 λ γ ) | , κ | 3 λ γ | , | Θ ( λ , γ , κ ) | | 1 2 ( 3 λ γ ) | ,
where
Θ ( λ , γ , κ ) = 1 δ 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 .
Proof. 
From (38), we have
c 3 = c 2 2 + κ ( p 2 q 2 ) 2 ( 3 λ γ ) .
Using (37), performing some calculations, we obtain
c 3 δ c 2 2 = κ ( p 2 q 2 ) 2 ( 3 λ γ ) + ( 1 δ ) c 2 2 = κ ( p 2 q 2 ) 2 ( 3 λ γ ) + ( 1 δ ) κ ( p 2 + q 2 ) 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 = κ Θ ( λ , γ , κ ) + 1 2 ( 3 λ γ ) p 2 + κ Θ ( λ , γ , κ ) + 1 2 ( 3 λ γ ) q 2 ,
where
Θ ( λ , γ , κ ) = 1 δ 4 λ 2 + 2 λ ( 1 2 γ ) 2 γ ( 1 γ ) + ( 2 λ γ ) 2 6 κ 2 .
In view of research of Kanas et al. [24], and applying (16), Lemma 1 finishes the proof. □
Remark 5.
Let δ = 1 . If ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , then
| c 3 c 2 2 | κ | 3 λ γ | .

4. Conclusions

A novel class B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) of λ -pseudo bi-starlike functions is presented, using the second Einstein function. The bounds for | c 2 | and | c 3 | are found. Additionally, for ϕ B Σ λ ( γ , κ ) , we estimate the Fekete–Szegö-type inequalities regarding these functions. As future work, specializing the parameters λ , γ suitably, as mentioned in Remarks 1–4, we will be able to investigate the Fekete–Szegö functional for the classes stated in Remarks 1–4, which have not yet been studied for the function class associated with Einstein function. Also, interested readers can investigate the corresponding results according to the first Einstein function.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H.E.-Q. and G.M.; methodology, A.H.E.-Q. and I.S.E.; software, B.H., M.A.M. and I.S.E.; validation, K.V., I.S.E. and B.H.; formal analysis, B.H.; investigation, G.M., I.S.E. and K.V.; resources, B.H. and A.H.E.-Q.; data curation, A.H.E.-Q. and M.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.V. and I.S.E.; writing—review and editing, B.H. and I.S.E.; visualization, B.H. and G.M.; supervision, A.H.E.-Q.; project administration, B.H., M.A.M. and K.V.; funding acquisition, B.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R1112), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R1112), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Babalola, K.O. On λ-pseudo-starlike functions. J. Class. Anal. 2013, 3, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Janowski, W. Some extremal problem for certain families of analytic functions I. Ann. Polon. Math. 1973, 28, 297–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khan, M.F. Properties of q-starlike functions associated with the q-cosine function. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, S.; Breaz, D.; Cotirla, L.-I.; Çetinkaya, A. Hankel determinants of normalized analytic functions associated with hyperbolic secant function. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, A.; Gong, J.; Al-Shbeil, I.; Rasheed, A.; Ali, A.; Hussain, S. Analytic functions related to a balloon-shaped domain. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  7. Natalini, P.; Bernardini, A. A generalization of the Bernoulli polynomials. J. Appl. Math. 2003, 794908, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. Debye Functions. In Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; 9th Printing: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lemmon, E.W.; Span, R. Short fundamental equations of state for 20 industrial fluids. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2006, 51, 785–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Qadeem, A.H.; Mamon, M.A.; Elshazly, I.S. Application of Einstein function on bi-univalent functions defined on the unit disc. Symmetry 2022, 14, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El-Qadeem, A.H.; Saleh, S.A.; Mamon, M.A. Bi-univalent function classes defined by using a second Einstein function. J. Function Spaces 2022, 3, 6933153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Srivastava, H.M.; Mishra, A.K.; Gochhayat, P. Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lewin, M. On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 18, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brannan, D.A.; Clunie, J. Aspects of Contemporary Complex Analysis; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brannan, D.A.; Taha, T.S. On some classes of bi-univalent functions. Studia Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 1986, 31, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bansal, D.; Sokół, J. Coefficient bound for a new class of analytic and bi-univalent functions. J. Fract. Calc. Appl. 2014, 5, 122–128. [Google Scholar]
  17. Frasin, B.A.; Aouf, M.K. New subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Appl. Matt. Lett. 2011, 24, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olatunji, S.O.; Ajai, P.T. On subclasses of bi-univalent functions of Bazilevic type involving linear and Salagean Operator. Inter. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2015, 92, 645–656. [Google Scholar]
  19. Srivastava, H.M.; Bulut, S.; Cagler, M.; Yagmur, N. Coefficient estimates for a general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Filomat 2013, 27, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Joshi, S.; Joshi, S.; Pawar, H. On some subclasses of bi-univalent functions associated with pseudo-starlike function. J. Egyptian Math. Soc. 2016, 24, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zaprawa, P. On the Fekete–Szego problem for classes of bi-univalent functions. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 2014, 21, 1–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zaprawa, P. Estimates of initial coefficients for bi-univalent functions. Abst. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 357480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions, Grundlehen der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 259; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kanas, S.; Adegani, E.A.; Zireh, A. An unified approach to second Hankel determinant of bi-subordinate functions. Mediterr. J. Math. 2017, 14, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Images of the open unit disc by Einstein functions.
Figure 1. Images of the open unit disc by Einstein functions.
Symmetry 16 01429 g001
Figure 2. E κ ( D ) by three different values of κ .
Figure 2. E κ ( D ) by three different values of κ .
Symmetry 16 01429 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Qadeem, A.H.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Halouani, B.; Elshazly, I.S.; Vijaya, K.; Mamon, M.A. On λ-Pseudo Bi-Starlike Functions Related to Second Einstein Function. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111429

AMA Style

El-Qadeem AH, Murugusundaramoorthy G, Halouani B, Elshazly IS, Vijaya K, Mamon MA. On λ-Pseudo Bi-Starlike Functions Related to Second Einstein Function. Symmetry. 2024; 16(11):1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111429

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Qadeem, Alaa H., Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy, Borhen Halouani, Ibrahim S. Elshazly, Kaliappan Vijaya, and Mohamed A. Mamon. 2024. "On λ-Pseudo Bi-Starlike Functions Related to Second Einstein Function" Symmetry 16, no. 11: 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111429

APA Style

El-Qadeem, A. H., Murugusundaramoorthy, G., Halouani, B., Elshazly, I. S., Vijaya, K., & Mamon, M. A. (2024). On λ-Pseudo Bi-Starlike Functions Related to Second Einstein Function. Symmetry, 16(11), 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111429

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop