Abstract
Symmetrical patterns exist in the nature of inequalities, which play a basic role in theoretical and applied mathematics. In several studies, inequalities present accurate approximations of functions based on their symmetry properties. In the paper, we prove the completely monotonic (CM) property of some functions involving the function and hence we deduce a new double inequality for it. Additionally, we study the CM degree of some functions involving the function . Our new bounds takes priority over some of the recently published results.
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
The Psi (or Digamma) function is defined by [1]
where the ordinary Euler’s gamma function is defined
The two functions and are called the tri- and tetra-gamma functions, respectively. The polygamma functions have several applications in special functions, applied mathematics and physics [2]. For example, several series involving polygamma functions formed in Feynman’s calculations [3] and in some mesh-free numerical methods, the digamma function use as family of basis functions for solving some partial differential equations [4].
For a function K defined on , if the derivatives exist for all with
then it is called CM [5] on the interval . Bernstein–Widder theorem states that [6], the function is CM on if, and only if, it is a Laplace transform of a bounded and non-decreasing measure.
Alzer deduced the inequality [7]
where
Guo et al. presented the CM property of the function [8]
Zhao et al. deduced the CM property of the functions [9]
Additionally, they deduced the inequality
Qi deduced the CM property of the function [10]
if, and only if, and so its negative if, and only if, . Additionally, he proved
if, and only if, and . In case of and , inequality (5) refines the upper bound and recovers the lower bound and of inequality (4). In 2022, Anis et al. presented the double inequality [11]
which improves the upper bound of inequality (5) for and its lower bound for .
Qi and Agarwal [12] presented a survey about the function contains inequalities, generalizations, q-analogous, CM property, several applications and pose some open problems. For more results about the function , we refer to [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] and the literature listed therein.
Let be a CM function on and use the notation . If is CM function on if, and only if, , then the number is called the CM degree of on and is denoted by . This concept is more accurately in measuring the CM property [9,23,24].
Qi deduced that [25]
and Zhao et al. deduced that [9]
where is a finite polynomial of degree 21 has positive coefficients. For more results about the concept of CM degree, we refer to [12,16,24,26,27,28], and the references therein.
In this paper, we prove the CM property of the functions
and deduce the inequality
which improve the lower bound of inequality (6) for and its upper bound for . Additionally, we study the CM degree of two functions involving .
2. Studying of Two CM Functions Involving
In the following sequel, we will use the following Lemma [29]:
Lemma 1.
Now, we will study two CM functions involving and deduce some new bounds of it.
Lemma 2.
The function
is CM on , where
Proof.
Then, for and, hence, for . Then, is CM function for . □
Corollary 1.
The following inequality holds
where
Proof.
Using the decreasing property of , and the asymptotic expansion [29]
where the Bernoulli number is defined by [30]
we get and hence for . □
Lemma 3.
The function
is CM for , where
Proof.
Now
and
Additionally, using the inequality , we get
Then, for , and hence the function is CM for . □
Corollary 2.
The following inequality holds
where
Proof.
Using the decreasing property of , and the asymptotic expansion (12), we get and then for . □
3. Two CM Functions Involving and Its New Inequality
In this section, we will study two CM functions involving and hence we will deduce a new inequality for this function.
Theorem 1.
The functions
and
are CM on .
Proof.
Using recursion formula [29]
we have
The CM property is closed under multiplication and, hence, the product of the functions and is CM for . Hence the difference is CM for , and then the function is also CM for , see [10]. Now, using the recursion formula (16), we get
Hence, the functions , and are CM for . □
Corollary 3.
The following inequality holds
Proof.
Remark 1.
The upper bound of inequality (17) is better than the upper bound of inequality (6) for . Additionally, the lower bound of inequality (17) is better than the lower bound of inequality (6) for . That is, our new bounds in inequality (17) takes priority over the bounds of inequality (6) except near the origin point.
4. Studying the CM Degrees of Two Functions Involving
Theorem 2.
The CM degree of the function is 1 on .
Proof.
Now, using the inequalities
and
we obtain that for . Furthermore, direct calculations by Mathematica software, has positive coefficients. Hence, for , and for . Then, is CM function for and we get
If we suppose that is CM for , then the function is decreasing, that is
where
with
Using the relation [31]
we get
Additionally,
Then,
and hence we get
Theorem 3.
The CM degree of on satisfies
5. Conclusions
The main conclusions of this paper are stated in Theorems 1–3. For the function , we investigate the complete monotonicity of the functions
Hence, we present a double inequality for . Additionally, for the two functions
and
we prove that and and then we deduce double inequality of the function .
Author Contributions
Writing to Original draft, O.A., A.T. and M.M. All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Andrews, G.E.; Askey, R.A.; Roy, R. Special Functions; Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 71; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, S.-L.; Vuorinen, M. Some properties of the gamma and psi functions, with applications. Math. Comput. 2005, 74, 723–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, A.R. Summations for certain series containing the digamma function. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 2006, 39, 3011–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkins, B.D.; Hromadka, T.V. Using the digamma function for basis functions in mesh-free computational methods. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2021, 131, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA; London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Widder, D.V. The Laplace Transform; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1946. [Google Scholar]
- Alzer, H. Sharp inequalities for the digamma and polygamma functions. Forum Math. 2004, 16, 181–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.-N.; Zhao, J.-L.; Qi, F. A completely monotonic function involving the tri- and tetra-gamma functions. Math. Slovaca 2013, 63, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.-L.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. A completely monotonic function involving the tri-gamma function and with degree one. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218, 9890–9897. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, F. Complete monotonicity of a function involving the tri- and tetra-gamma functions. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2015, 18, 253–264. [Google Scholar]
- Anis, M.; Almuashi, H.; Mahmoud, M. Complete monotonicity of functions related to Trigamma and Tetragamma functions. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2022, 131, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F.; Agarwal, R.P. On complete monotonicity for several classes of functions related to ratios of gamma functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batir, N. On some properties of digamma and polygamma functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 328, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F.; Srivastava, H.M. Some uniqueness results for the non-trivially complete monotonicity of a class of functions involving the polygamma and related functions. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2010, 21, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. A class of completely monotonic functions involving divided differences of the psi and tri-gamma functions and some applications. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2011, 48, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koumandos, S. Monotonicity of some functions involving the gamma and psi functions. Math. Comp. 2008, 77, 2261–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F. Complete monotonicity of functions involving the q-trigamma and q-tetragamma functions. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 2015, 109, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F.; Guo, B.-N. Complete monotonicity of divided differences of the di- and tri-gamma functions with applications. Georgian Math. J. 2016, 23, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F. Necessary and sufficient conditions for a ratio involving trigamma and tetragamma functions to be monotonic. Turkish J. Inequal. 2021, 5, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, F. Necessary and sufficient conditions for complete monotonicity and monotonicity of two functions defined by two derivatives of a function involving trigamma function. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2021, 15, 378–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F. Two monotonic functions defined by two derivatives of a function involving trigamma function. TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math. 2022, 13, 91–104. [Google Scholar]
- You, X.; Han, M. Continued fraction approximation for the Gamma function based on the Tri-gamma function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2018, 457, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Complete monotonicity of two functions involving the tri- and tetra-gamma functions. Period. Math. Hungar. 2012, 65, 147–155. [Google Scholar]
- Koumandos, S.; Lamprecht, M. Complete monotonicity and related properties of some special functions. Math. Comp. 2013, 82, 1097–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Qi, F. Completely monotonic degree of a function involving the trigamma and tetragamma functions. AIMS Math. 2020, 5, 3391–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. On the degree of the weighted geometric mean as a complete Bernstein function. Afr. Math. 2015, 26, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F.; Wang, S.-H. Complete monotonicity, completely monotonic degree, integral representations, and an inequality related to the exponential, trigamma, and modified Bessel functions. Glob. J. Math. Anal. 2014, 2, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F. Properties of modified Bessel functions and completely monotonic degrees of differences between exponential and trigamma functions. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 18, 493–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; Dover Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Shuang, Y.; Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. Logarithmic convexity and increasing property of the Bernoulli numbers and their ratios. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas FÍsicas Nat. Ser. MatemÁticas 2021, 115, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzer, H. On some inequalities for the gamma and psi functions. Math. Comput. 1997, 66, 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).