Next Article in Journal
New Acoustic Features for Synthetic and Replay Spoofing Attack Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Product of Hessians and Discriminant of Critical Points of Level Function Attached to Sphere Arrangement
Previous Article in Journal
An Alternative Low-Cost Embedded NILM System for Household Energy Conservation with a Low Sampling Rate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transient Propagation of Spherical Waves in Porous Material: Application of Fractional Calculus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

j-Dimensional Integral Involving the Logarithmic and Exponential Functions: Derivation and Evaluation

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(2), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020280
Submission received: 5 January 2022 / Revised: 17 January 2022 / Accepted: 22 January 2022 / Published: 29 January 2022

Abstract

:
In the fields of science and engineering, tasks involving repeated integrals appear on occasion. The authors’ study on repeated integrals of a class of exponential and logarithmic functions is presented in this publication. The paper includes several examples that demonstrate the evaluation of the analytical parts of the multi-dimensional integral derived. All the results in this work are new.

1. Introduction

The idea of multiple or repeated integrals has been around for decades. Work involving multiple definite integrals has been used in the studies of Reynolds et al. [1], Jain et al. [2], Agarwal et al. [3], Sergey et al. [4], Wiener [5], Kiyoshi [6] and Olver [7], to name a few.
Our definition of a multiple definite integral in the present paper is obtained using the contour integral method in [8,9]. In our definition, we are able to evaluate the multiple integral in terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function and other special functions and fundamental constants. The importance of this work lies in the formulation of a j-dimensional generalized integral transform in terms of a special function from which other inetgral transforms can be derived. For example, quadruple, sextuple, double integrals, etc., can be derived from one generalized transform. This, in our opinion, could prove useful for researchers requiring such an integral transform for their research. The generalized integral transform is derived in terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function, which arises due to the contour integral method in [8].
In Section 2, we define and derive the j-dimensional definite integral in terms of a contour integral. In Section 3, we define the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function and derive a contour integral representation for this special function. In Section 4, we establish a definite j-dimensional definite integral in terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function. Almost all Hurwitz–Lerch zeta functions have an asymmetrical zero distribution [10]. We also derive special cases of this j-dimensional definite integral in terms of fundamental constants and dimensionality of the definite integral.
In this paper, we derive the j-dimensional definite integral given by
0 0 x 1 m 1 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 2 m + n 1 log k a x 1 l = 1 j x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 x 2 l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 ,
where the parameters k , a , b , n , m are general complex numbers and 0 < R e ( m ) < 1 / 2 , I m ( n ) 0 , 0 I m ( a ) < 2 π , 0 I m ( b ) < 2 π . This definite integral will be used to derive special cases in terms of special functions and fundamental constants. The derivations follow the method used by us in [8]. This method involves using a form of the generalized Cauchy’s integral formula given by
y k Γ ( k + 1 ) = 1 2 π i C e w y w k + 1 d w ,
where C is, in general, an open contour in the complex plane; see Figure 1, where the bilinear concomitant has the same value at the end points of the contour and the contour lies on either side of the cut. We then multiply both sides by a function of x 1 x 2 j + 2 , and then take a definite j-dimensional integral of both sides. This yields a definite integral in terms of a contour integral. Then, we multiply both sides of Equation (2) by another function of y and take the infinite sum of both sides such that the contour integrals of both equations are the same.

2. Definite Integral of the Contour Integral

We use the method in [8]. The variable of integration in the contour integral is r = w + m n . The cut and contour are in the first quadrant of the complex r-plane. The cut approaches the origin from the interior of the first quadrant and the contour goes around the origin with zero radius and is on opposite sides of the cut. Using a generalization of Cauchy’s integral formula, we form the j-dimensional integral by replacing y with
log a x 1 l = 1 j x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 x 2 ,
and multiplying by
x 1 m 1 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 2 m + n 1 l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 ,
and then taking the definite integral with respect to x 1 [ 0 , ) x 2 j + 2 [ 0 , ) to obtain
1 Γ ( k + 1 ) 0 0 x 1 m 1 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 2 m + n 1 log k a x 1 l = 1 j x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 x 2 l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 = 1 2 π i 0 0 C a w w k 1 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 1 m + w 1 x 2 m + n w 1 l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 ( m + w ) + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 ( m + w ) + n 2 1 d w d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 = 1 2 π i C 0 0 a w w k 1 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 1 m + w 1 x 2 m + n w 1 l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 ( m + w ) + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 ( m + w ) + n 2 1 d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 d w = 1 2 π i C 2 j π j + 1 a w b j 1 n 2 j 2 w k 1 csc π 2 j ( m + w ) n d w ,
from Equation (3.326.2) in [11], where R e ( m + w ) n > 0 , 0 < R e ( m ) < 1 / 2 , I m ( n ) 0 , 0 I m ( a ) < 2 π , 0 I m ( b ) < 2 π —see Figure 1, for example—and using the reflection formula (8.334.3) in [11] for the Gamma function Γ ( z ) . We are able to switch the order of integration over x 1 x 2 j + 2 and r using Fubini’s theorem for multiple integrals—see (9.112) in [12]—since the integrand is of bounded measure over the space C × [ 0 , ) × [ 0 , ) .

3. The Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta Function and Infinite Sum of the Contour Integral

In this section, we use Equation (2) in [1] to derive the contour integral representations for the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function. The significance of this section is to derive a special function equivalent to the definite integral of the contour integral derived in Section 2 in terms of the same contour integral.

3.1. The Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta Function

The Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function (25.14) in [10,13] has a series representation given by
Φ ( z , s , v ) = n = 0 z n ( n + v ) s ,
where v C Z 0 ; s C when | z | < 1 ; R e ( s ) > 1 when | z | = 1 . Here, Z 0 denotes the set of non-positive integers and is continued analytically by its integral representation given by
Φ ( z , s , v ) = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 t s 1 e v t 1 z e t d t = 1 Γ ( s ) 0 t s 1 e ( v 1 ) t e t z d t ,
where R e ( v ) > 0 , and either | z | 1 , z 1 , R e ( s ) > 0 , or z = 1 , R e ( s ) > 1 .

3.2. Infinite Sum of the Contour Integral

Using Equation (2) in [1] and replacing y with
log ( a ) + i π 2 j ( 2 y + 1 ) n ,
and then multiplying both sides by
i ( 2 π ) j + 1 b j 1 n 2 j 2 e i π 2 j m ( 2 y + 1 ) n ,
and then taking the infinite sum over y [ 0 , ) and simplifying in terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch zeta function, we obtain
i b j 1 ( 2 π ) j + k + 1 n 2 ( j + 1 ) i 2 j n k e i π 2 j m n Φ e i 2 j + 1 m π n , k , π i 2 j n log ( a ) 2 π Γ ( k + 1 ) = 1 2 π i y = 0 C i ( 2 π ) j + 1 a w b j 1 n 2 ( j + 1 ) w k 1 e i π 2 j ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) n d w = 1 2 π i C y = 0 i ( 2 π ) j + 1 a w b j 1 n 2 ( j + 1 ) w k 1 e i π 2 j ( 2 y + 1 ) ( m + w ) n d w = 1 2 π i C 2 j π j + 1 a w b j 1 n 2 ( j + 1 ) w k 1 csc π 2 j ( m + w ) n d w ,
from Equation (1.232.3) in [11], where I m ( m + w ) n > 0 in order for the sum to converge.

4. Definite Integral in Terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta Function

In this section, we evaluate Equation (7) for various values of the parameters to derive special cases in terms of the dimensionality of the integral and special functions and fundamental constants. The special functions and constants used are the polylogarithm function L i k ( z ) given in (25.12.10) in [13], the Riemann zeta function ζ ( s ) given in (25.2.1) in [13], Apéry’s constant ζ ( 3 ) given in (25.6.9) in [13] and Catalan’s constant K given in (25.11.40) in [13].
Theorem 1.
For k , a C , 0 < R e ( m ) < 1 / 2 , R e ( b ) > 0 , 0 I m ( b ) 2 π , 0 I m ( a ) 2 π , I m ( n ) < 0 ,
0 0 x 1 m 1 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 2 m + n 1 log k a x 1 l = 1 j x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 x 2 l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 = i b j 1 ( 2 π ) j + k + 1 n 2 ( j + 1 ) i 2 j n k e i π 2 j m n Φ e i 2 j + 1 m π n , k , π i 2 j n log ( a ) 2 π .
Proof. 
The right-hand sides of relations (3) and (6) are identical; hence, their left-hand sides are also identical. The required result is obtained by simplifying with the Gamma function. □
Remark 1.
The degenerate case.
0 0 x 1 m 1 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 2 m + n 1 l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 = 2 j π j + 1 b j 1 n 2 ( j + 1 ) csc π 2 j m n .
Proof. 
Use Equation (7) and set k = 0 and simplify using entry (2) in table below (64:12:7) in [14]. □
Remark 2.
A 2 j + 2 -dimensional integral in terms of the logarithmic and trigonometric functions.
0 0 e b x 1 n + x 2 n x 2 m + n q 1 x 1 log x 1 l = 1 j x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 x 2 x 2 m x 1 q l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 q + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 q + n 2 1 x 1 m x 2 q l = 1 j e b x 2 l + 1 n + x 2 l + 2 n x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 m + n 2 1 d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 = 2 π j b j 1 n 2 j 1 log cot π 2 j 1 m n tan π 2 j 1 q n .
Proof. 
Use Equation (7) and form a second equation by replacing m q and taking the difference, and then set k = 1 , a = 1 and simplify using entry (3) in the table below (64:12:7) in [14]. □
Remark 3.
A quadruple integral in terms of the logarithmic and trigonometric functions.
0 0 0 0 e π x 1 3 + x 2 3 + x 3 3 + x 4 3 x 1 12 x 2 5 / 3 x 3 5 / 6 x 4 6 x 2 7 / 4 x 3 3 / 4 x 4 4 x 1 3 / 4 log x 1 x 3 x 2 x 4 d x 1 d x 2 d x 3 d x 4 = log 2 + 3 tan π 9 27 π .
Proof. 
Use Equation (9) and set b = π , m = 1 / 4 , q = 1 / 3 , n = 3 , j = 1 and simplify. □
Remark 4.
An octuple integral in terms of the constant log ( 3 ) .
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 exp 1 16 π x 1 4 + x 2 4 + x 3 4 + x 4 4 + x 5 4 + x 6 4 + x 7 4 + x 8 4 x 1 3 / 4 x 8 3 log x 1 x 3 x 5 2 x 7 4 x 2 x 4 x 6 2 x 8 4 x 1 12 x 2 8 / 3 x 3 4 / 3 x 4 2 / 3 x 5 5 / 3 x 6 3 x 7 7 / 3 x 2 11 / 4 x 3 5 / 4 x 4 3 / 4 x 5 3 / 2 x 6 x 7 2 x 8 3 d x 1 d x 2 d x 3 d x 4 d x 5 d x 6 d x 7 d x 8 = 2 log ( 3 ) π .
Proof. 
Use Equation (9) and set b = π / 16 , m = 1 / 4 , q = 1 / 3 , n = 4 , j = 3 and simplify. □
Remark 5.
The polylogarithm function L i k ( z ) .
0 0 x 1 2 j 1 x 2 2 j + 2 j 1 e b x 1 2 j + x 2 2 j l = 1 j x 2 l + 1 2 j + l 1 + 2 j 1 1 x 2 l + 2 2 j + l 1 + 2 j 1 1 e b x 2 l + 1 2 j + x 2 l + 2 2 j log k x 1 l = 1 j x 2 l + 1 2 l 1 x 2 l + 2 2 l 1 x 2 d x 1 d x 2 j + 2 = i 2 j 2 ( j + 1 ) e i π 2 j i π 2 1 j i k b j 1 ( 2 π ) j + k + 1 Li k e i 2 1 j π .
Proof. 
Use Equation (7) and set a = 1 , m = 1 / n and simplify using Equation (64:12:2) in [14]. □
Remark 6.
A quadruple integral in terms of the Riemann zeta function ζ ( k ) .
0 0 0 0 x 2 x 3 e b x 1 2 + x 2 2 + x 3 2 + x 4 2 log k x 1 x 3 x 2 x 4 x 1 x 4 d x 1 d x 2 d x 3 d x 4 = i k 2 k 2 2 k + 1 1 π k + 2 ζ ( k ) b 2 .
Proof. 
Use Equation (12) and set j = 1 and simplify using entry (4) in the table below (25:12:5) in [14]. □
Remark 7.
A quadruple integral in terms of the constant log ( 2 ) .
0 0 0 0 e 1 2 π 2 x 1 2 + x 2 2 + x 3 2 + x 4 2 x 2 x 3 x 1 x 4 log x 1 x 3 x 2 x 4 d x 1 d x 2 d x 3 d x 4 = i log ( 2 ) .
Proof. 
Use Equation (13), set b = π 8 and apply l’Hopital’s rule as k 1 and simplify using Equation (25.4.1) in [13]. □
Remark 8.
A quadruple integral in terms of Apéry’s constant ζ ( 3 ) .
0 0 0 0 e 1 8 3 2 π x 1 2 + x 2 2 + x 3 2 + x 4 2 x 2 x 3 x 1 x 4 log 3 x 1 x 3 x 2 x 4 d x 1 d x 2 d x 3 d x 4 = i ζ ( 3 ) .
Proof. 
Use Equation (13) and set k = 3 , b = 3 128 π and simplify. □
Remark 9.
A sextuple integral in terms of Catalan’s constant K.
0 0 0 0 0 0 e 1 32 π 3 3 x 1 4 + x 2 4 + x 3 4 + x 4 4 + x 5 4 + x 6 4 x 2 11 / 4 x 3 5 / 4 x 4 3 / 4 x 5 3 / 2 x 6 x 1 3 / 4 log 2 x 1 x 3 x 5 2 x 2 x 4 x 6 2 d x 1 d x 2 d x 3 d x 4 d x 5 d x 6 = 1 4 π 2 48 i K .
Proof. 
Use Equation (12) and set k = 2 , b = π 98304 1 / 3 , j = 2 and simplify using Equation (2.2.1.2.7) in [15]. □

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we have presented a novel method for deriving a new j-dimensional integral transform along with some interesting definite integrals, using contour integration. The results presented were numerically verified for both real and imaginary and complex values of the parameters in the integrals using Mathematica by Wolfram.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R.; methodology, R.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.R.; writing—review and editing, R.R. and A.S.; and funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by NSERC Canada under Grant 504070.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. A Double Logarithmic Transform Involving the Exponential and Polynomial Functions Expressed in Terms of the Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta Function. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jain, S.; Mehrez, K.; Baleanu, D.; Agarwal, P. Certain Hermite–Hadamard Inequalities for Logarithmically Convex Functions with Applications. Mathematics 2019, 7, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Agarwal, P.; Agarwal, R.P.; Ruzhansky, M. Special Functions and Analysis of Differential Equations, 1st ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 9 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sekatskii, S.K.; Beltraminelli, S.; Merlini, D. On Equalities Involving Integrals of the Logarithm of the Riemann—Function with Exponential Weight Which Are Equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis. Int. J. Anal. 2015, 2015, 980728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wiener, N. The homogeneous chaos. Am. J. Math. 1938, 60, 897–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kiyosi, I.T.Ô. Multiple Wiener Integral. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 1951, 3, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Olver, F.W.J. Asymptotics and Special Functions; A. K. Peters: Wellesley, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  8. Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. A Method for Evaluating Definite Integrals in Terms of Special Functions with Examples. Int. Math. Forum 2020, 15, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. Definite Integral of Exponential Polynomial and Hyperbolic Function in terms of the Incomplete Gamma Function. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 14, 1295–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Laurincikas, A.; Garunkstis, R. The Lerch Zeta-Function; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 11 December 2013; 189p. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Tables of Integrals, Series and Products, 6th ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  12. Harrison, M.; Waldron, P. Mathematics for Economics and Finance; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Olver, F.W.J.; Lozier, D.W.; Boisvert, R.F.; Clark, C.W. (Eds.) NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions; With 1 CD-ROM (Windows, Macintosh and UNIX), MR 2723248 (2012a:33001); U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Washington, DC, USA; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Oldham, K.B.; Myland, J.C.; Spanier, J. An Atlas of Functions: With Equator, the Atlas Function Calculator, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewin, L. Polylogarithms and Associated Functions; North-Holland Publishing Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Path of the cut.
Figure 1. Path of the cut.
Symmetry 14 00280 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reynolds, R.; Stauffer, A. j-Dimensional Integral Involving the Logarithmic and Exponential Functions: Derivation and Evaluation. Symmetry 2022, 14, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020280

AMA Style

Reynolds R, Stauffer A. j-Dimensional Integral Involving the Logarithmic and Exponential Functions: Derivation and Evaluation. Symmetry. 2022; 14(2):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reynolds, Robert, and Allan Stauffer. 2022. "j-Dimensional Integral Involving the Logarithmic and Exponential Functions: Derivation and Evaluation" Symmetry 14, no. 2: 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop