Next Article in Journal
Towards a Formal IoT Security Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Location Selection of a Manufacturing Facility from the Perspective of Supply Chain Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Computing the Closest Approach Distance of Two Ellipsoids
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Extension of the TOPSIS Method Adapted for the Use of Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets and Hamming Distance for E-Commerce Development Strategies Selection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Bibliometric Analysis of Symmetry (2009–2019)

by
Bo Li
1,
Zeshui Xu
2,*,
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
3,*,
Jurgita Antuchevičienė
4 and
Zenonas Turskis
5
1
Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China
2
Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
3
Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT–10223 Vilnius, Saulėtekio al. 11, Lithuania
4
Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT–10223 Vilnius, Saulėtekio al. 11, Lithuania
5
Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT–10223 Vilnius, Saulėtekio al. 11, Lithuania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2020, 12(8), 1304; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12081304
Submission received: 20 July 2020 / Revised: 26 July 2020 / Accepted: 29 July 2020 / Published: 5 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetric and Asymmetric Data in Solution Models)

Abstract

:
Symmetry is an international journal in the research fields of physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, computer science, theory and methods, and other scientific disciplines and engineering. The first paper was published in 2009. Here, we make a bibliometric analysis of publications in Symmetry from 2009 to 2019. According to Web of Science (WoS), we obtained 3215 publications in this journal. First, we explore the publications, citation number, and citation structure based on bibliometric indicators. Second, we analyze the most influential objects, including countries/regions, institutions, authors, and papers. Cooperation networks are also presented. Next, the co-citation and burst detection analyses are conducted according to the techniques of visualization tools, i.e., VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Furthermore, the co-occurrence analyses and timeline view analyses of keywords are investigated, aiming to explore the research hotspots. Finally, this paper provides relatively thorough perspectives and reviews and discloses the future development trend of this journal and challenges for scholars, which will promote the development of the journal and in-depth research of scholars.

1. Introduction

The bibliometric method has been widely applied in exploring publications’ structure and the development of a journal. In recent years, scholars have systematically researched journals, such as European Journal of Operational Research [1], Technological and Economic Development of Economy [2], Information Sciences [3], IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems [4], International Journal of Strategic Property Management [5], Journal of Civil Engineering and Management [6], and Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering [7]. The development trends of various research topics are also conducted, related to fuzzy decision making [8], sustainable energy [9], support vector machines [10], etc. Combining with visualization tools, i.e., VOSviewer [11,12], CiteSpace [13,14,15], CiteNetExplorer [16], Bicomb [17,18], BibExcel [19,20], etc., the science mapping enriches the contents of bibliometric analyses from co-citation, co-occurrence, co-authorship, and burst detection aspects. It also helps scholars intuitively grasp research trends greatly and main research focuses in different phases [21]. In this paper, VOSviewer and CiteSpace are used to demonstrate the characteristics of the journal. The former conducts the co-citation analysis, co-authorship analysis, and co-occurrence analysis, aiming to present the structure of publications. The latter is chosen to cluster keywords and track development trends in different years of the journal by cluster analysis, burst detection analysis, and timeline analysis.
Symmetry is an international open-access journal indexed by the Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science, search for “Symmetry-Basel”), Scopus, MathSciNet (American Mathematical Society), and other databases with an impact factor of 2.645 by Journal Citation Reports (2019). It covers research on symmetry phenomena in scientific studies, including physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, computer science, theory and method, etc. The details are listed as Table 1:
To date, Symmetry has published over 3000 documents with the development of 12 years. Therefore, it is valuable to explore the development trend based on bibliometric methods and science mapping. Since the first paper published in Symmetry in 2009, we analyze the journal from 2009 to 2019 mainly from following aspects (considering the completeness of data, we only searched the publications from 2009 to 2019): (1) the basic characteristics of publications are presented to describe development status, including the type of publications, annual number, citation number, and the productive contributors; (2) the top 15 most cited papers are listed. The influential countries/regions, institutions, and authors in the journal are provided, based on the total number of publications (TP), the total number of citations (TC), the number of citation-year distribution (C), the number of average citation (AC), H-index, the number of publications that satisfy certain citations (i.e., 100, 50) [22,23], etc. Besides, we also analyze the important cooperation relationship; (3) the co-citation analyses at the level of reference/source/authors, the burst detections of cited authors and cited journals, and the co-occurrence analyses and timeline view analysis of keywords are given, which is conducive to clear the development directions and the changes of research focus; (4) the future challenges of Symmetry are also discussed, combining with the above results.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 illustrates the data source and analyzes the basic characteristics, i.e., publications, citation numbers, and citation structure. The influential contributors in terms of papers, countries/regions, institutions, and authors are presented in Section 3. The co-citation and burst detections analyses are given in Section 4. Section 5 focuses on the co-occurrence and timeline view analyses of keywords. Section 6 discusses the characteristics of this journal and presents future suggestions according to the whole analyses. Some conclusions are provided to end this paper in Section 7.

2. Data Source and Basic Characteristics

This paper mainly uses the bibliometric method to study the publications in Symmetry from 2009 to 2019. The literature data are from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database on June 24, 2020, using Symmetry-Basel (we replace Symmetry-Basel with Symmetry below). Then, through the search for the journal’s name, we found 3125 papers.
Base on the analytic results given by WoS, we obtain Figure 1 and find that the paper types published on Symmetry are classified into five kinds. The number of articles is 2941 and far more than other types of publications. This is followed by 161 reviews, 21 editorial material, 2 corrections, and 1 biographic item. This phenomenon shows that Symmetry focuses on academic articles. Then, the total number of publications (TP), the total number of citations distribution (TC), and the number of citation-year distribution (C) in the journal from 2009 to 2019 are illustrated in Figure 2. In this paper, we also use AC to denote the average number of citations per publication.
From Figure 2a, the annual number of publications per year shows an increasing trend. To be specific, the annual publications were less than 100 before 2015. Then, it has been increasing rapidly, and the annual publications have been greater than 1000 in 2019, which shows that more and more scholars have paid attention to the journal.
Furthermore, Figure 2a describes the citation numbers of papers published in each year. The publications receive the most citations (3324) in 2018, followed by 2234 citations in 2019, and 1930 citations in 2017. The trend of citations had three peaks, i.e., in 2010 (1388), 2015 (918), and 2018 (3324), respectively. Figure 2b illustrates the citation numbers of each year from 2009 to 2019. We can see that the citation-year distributions increased year by year. In 2009, the number of citations was only 3; since 2011, the annual number of citations was more than 100. By 2018, the number of citations increased to 1840, which denotes that Symmetry was paid close attention. The low citation-year, i.e., 2013, does not mean that no excellent studies appeared; the number of citations is dynamic and time is required for publications to be widely recognized and cited [24]. Table 2 is provided to explore more detailed information about Symmetry. Among the several indicators, H-index considers both the number of publications and citations; the index without self-citations is an important indicator. A high H-index implies a greater achievement [25]. Furthermore, different intervals reflect the number of citations; for example, ≥50 denotes the number of publications that cited times great than or equal to 50. From Table 2, the paper published in 2018 has the greatest TC (3324) and H-index (24), 2010 has the greatest AC (18). It is obvious that as time goes by, the influence of Symmetry has increased. Based on the data collection from WoS, only in 2010 and 2015 were there two papers that satisfy the standard of “≥100”, and three papers were high-cited papers.
Next, this paper analyzes the productive objects, including countries/regions, institutions, and authors. The countries/regions with greater than 100 publications are presented in Figure 3 and then the top 10 productive institutions and authors are presented in Table 3. From Figure 3, we can see that the scholars in China have published 1226 papers and rank in the first place. Following, the scholars in the USA and South Korea both published more than 340 papers each, and rank in the second and the third places, respectively. The fourth to eleventh productive countries/regions are Spain (217), Pakistan (207), Saudi Arabia (177), Italy (118), Malaysia (114), Poland (109), Japan (107), and India (106).
In terms of institutions, China Medical University Taiwan published 66 papers and ranks first, followed by the National University of Defense Technology China (59), Beijing Jiaotong University (54), King Abdulaziz University (52), and the University of New Mexico (51), respectively. In the top 10 institutions, 6 of them are from China.
On the author’s side, Smarandache F., from the USA, and Zhang X. H., from China, rank first and second, with 51 and 31 publications, respectively. Among the top 10 most productive authors, 4 of them are from China, 4 come from South Korea, 1 comes from the USA, and the other is Vietnamese. From the above three aspects, Symmetry has aroused special attention for scholars from China, the USA, and Korea.
Furthermore, the subject areas of Symmetry relate to physics, chemistry, biology, computer science, theory and methods, etc., which is multidisciplinary. Since it published papers, some publications impact the corresponding field. Table 4 lists the details of the top 15 most influential papers, including author, type, year, citation, etc.
From Table 4, 5 publications are articles and 10 publications are reviews. The top three cited publications are all reviews [26,27,28] and high-cited papers. Furthermore, two of them are studying fluctuating asymmetry, which has been widely investigated from basic theories, methods, and applications. Besides, the top 15 most cited papers were mainly published in 2010 (7), 2014 (2), 2015 (2), and 2018 (2). Furthermore, 10 of them have more than one author. Thus, the cooperation of authors also plays a key role in academic research.

3. Influential Contributor Analyses

According to Table 4, the frequency of the most cited paper is 183; it reviewed old and new methods of measuring fluctuation asymmetry and then reviewed the theory, developmental origins, and the applications of fluctuation asymmetry [26].
The paper “Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories” was cited 175 times; it reviewed inflationary cosmology in modified gravity [27]. The paper “Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications” ranks third place and was cited 125 times. The theme of this paper is the same as the most cited paper, i.e., fluctuating asymmetry. This paper summarized the concepts and morphometric methods for studying fluctuating asymmetry of shape and size.
In the top 15 most cited papers, we can find that there are only 2 papers published in recent years (in 2018); thus, the papers published in recent years still need time to gain attention. These data illustrate that the top 15 most cited papers all promote the development and advance of the journal and the related research fields.
Figure 4 depicts the cooperation network among countries/regions, where the nodes represent the countries/regions, and the sizes denote the citations; that is, the larger the size of the node, the greater the number of citations. The lines between two countries/regions denote that they cooperate. The density of the links of a country indicates the cooperation degree. The denser of the lines, the more collaboration for one country with other countries. From Figure 4, we can see that China, the USA, Pakistan, and the UK have more lines. Therefore, they have more cooperation with other countries.
Table 5 gives the top 10 most influential countries/regions and their corresponding data. China has the most citations (4002) and the highest H-index (24), which is consistent with Figure 4. For 100, each of the USA, Spain, the UK, Japan, and Italy has one paper. Furthermore, it can be seen that 5 papers from China have more than 50 citations, 36 papers have more than 20 citations, and 86 papers have more than 10 citations. There are 91 papers from the USA with more than 10 citations, which are far more than other countries. Thus, China and the USA are two biggest contributors to this journal. It is noted that, although the UK only has 96 publications on Symmetry, it has the highest AC with 7.28, which means that these papers play an important role in the related research fields. China and Saudi Arabia have 10 high-cited papers each. We also find that the top 10 most influential countries/regions are mainly from Asia and Europe.
Furthermore, the top 10 most cited institutions are presented in Table 6. The University of New Mexico is the most cited institution, with 491 citations and 11 H-index, while its AC is only 9.63. Sichuan Normal University has 362 citations and ranks in second place. The University of Manchester has the greatest AC (43.30), even though it only has 5 papers, which explains the importance of these papers and the related research topics. Its most cited paper, Analyzing Fluctuating Asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, is the third most cited paper of Symmetry.
Next, the most cited authors are analyzed and the top 10 most influential authors are presented in Table 7. Smarandache F. has the greatest TC and H-index, ranking in the first place. Besides, even though each of Hel-Or Hagit, Nevo Eviatar, and Raz Shmuel only published two papers in Symmetry, their AC is the highest (95.50). Furthermore, they relate to the same paper, i.e., Fluctuating Asymmetry: Methods, Theory, and Applications, the most cited paper in Table 4. Graham, John H. ranks in second place of AC and is also the author of the same paper. This phenomenon can be explained by the cooperative relationship among authors. Then, we analyze the cooperation relationship and depict the corresponding science mapping as shown in Figure 5.
The visualization of the cooperation network only presents 296 authors, which is the closest network by setting the minimum number of documents of an author as two. In Figure 5, the size of the node denotes the number of citations, for example, the node for Smarandache F., is the largest, followed by Wei G. W., which is consistent with Table 7. Besides, the links between the two authors mean that they cooperate. The links linked to Smarandache F. are the greatest, therefore having 43 links, 6.1% of the total links (704), and their total link strength is 99, 8% of the whole link strength (1244). Then, Zhang X. H. has 16 links and a total link strength of 56, 4.5% of 1244.

4. The Co-Citation and the Burst Detection Analysis

In this section, we make co-citation and the burst detection analysis by depicting visualizations combining with VOSviewer and CiteSpace. The co-citation analyses are conducted from the following aspects: reference co-citation, source co-citation, and author co-citation. Citation burst detection reflects the explosive data, that is, in a certain period, scholars’ attention is attracted [29].
Figure 6 illustrates the closest reference co-citation network, where the threshold that denotes the minimum number of citations of a cited reference is 20, and there are 31 references that satisfy the threshold. The closest network includes 25 references. In Figure 6, a node shows a reference, the size of the node denotes the citations number of the references. A link between two references means a co-citation relationship. The thicker the link is, the more citations the reference has. There are 5 clusters marked with different colors. Furthermore, the paper Fuzzy sets, Information Control, 1965, 8, 2–3: 30–33 (cited 38,108 times) ranks in first place, with 203 citations in Symmetry. Similarly, the author and source co-citation networks are also be displayed. Then, Table 8 presents the top 10 most cited references/sources/authors by publications in Symmetry.
Table 8 lists the information of the top 10 most cited references/sources/authors by publications in Symmetry. Six of references are published before 2010, and the first cited reference is from 1965 by Zadeh [30]. Only two references had a number of citations more than 100. Phys. Rev. D ranks the first cited source with 2226 citations. In terms of cited authors, Ye, J. H. received the most citations, with 336, followed by Smarandache, F (331) and Zadeh, La (307).
Through detecting bursts, Table 9 lists the top 10 cited authors of publications in Symmetry with the strongest citation bursts. Zadeh La on the top of the list with the maximum burst strength of 17.965. All of them have a citation burst duration with three years and close to the present (from 2018 to 2019), which shows that their work may have formed a hot and leading topic.
Table 10 presents the top 15 cited journals with the strongest citation bursts from 2009 to 2019. The cited journals receive frequent citations by Symmetry in a certain period. The citation bursts of the cited journals of Inform. Control. had the longest strength (39.1302). Besides, 5 of the top 15 cited journals had the longest duration, with 8 years from 2009 to 2016, which means that the publications in Symmetry cited these journals earlier and explosively. Of these 15, 7 are the closest to 2019, such as Inform. Control., Knowl-Based Syst., and IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., which illustrates that they still have an influence on Symmetry and can even influence the future research directions.

5. Co-Occurrence and Timeline Analyses of Keywords

This section analyzes the co-occurrence of author-keywords and presents the timeline view. In the 1980 s, the co-occurrence analysis was first provided and has been widely applied in bibliometrics analyses [31]. When more than or equal to two keywords appear in the same paper, this can be called keywords occurrence [32]. Through the co-occurrence analysis, we can identify the research hotspots of the journal.
There are 11,731 author-keywords of publications in the journal from 2009 to 2019, according toVOSviewer. Figure 7 presents the author-keywords co-occurrence network, where there are 164 author-keywords, by setting the threshold of minimum occurrences to five and giving the closest relationship. They are classified into 16 clusters marked in different colors. The node presents an author-keyword; its size denotes the citations. The bigger the node is, the more citations the keyword has. A link between two nodes means the co-occurrence of the two keywords. In Figure 7, symmetry has the greatest citations; therefore, it has the most links with other clusters. Then, we present the top 20 most frequent author-keywords and their frequencies in Table 11.
The frequency of symmetry is 92 and ranks first. Following, decision making (37), deep learning (30), fixed point (29), and machine learning (27) rank in the second to fifth place, respectively, which explain the research topics of the journal. The frequencies of all the keywords in Table 11 are higher than 10, and seven of them have frequencies greater than 20.
Table 12 explains the top 20 keywords with the strongest citation bursts. Most of them are close to present (2019), such as fuzzy set, decision making, aggregation operator, deep learning, etc., which denote that the research contents in the publications of Symmetry closely follow hot topics and leading issues. Comparing Table 11 with Table 12, we can find several of the same keywords, i.e., symmetry, decision making, symmetry breaking, neutrosophic set, and deep learning. This phenomenon explains that these are the research hotspots of the journal from 2009 to 2019; at the same time, the research fever of these may continue. Thus, the scholars interested in the journal can start from these research topics.
Figure 8 shows the keyword clusters visualizations by CiteSpace and summarizes nine clusters for all keywords of publication in Symmetry, which are “exact solution”, “decision making”, “aromaticity”, “aesthetic”, “deep learning”, “cyclic twin”, “fixed point”, “quantum theory”, and “drosophila melanogaster” in order.
Then, based on the timeline view of keywords, the development and the research trend of the hotspots from 2009 to 2019 are presented. In Figure 9, there are four stages from the time perspective. Specifically, it focused more on the “symmetry property”, “simulation”, “aromaticity”, “model”, and so on, between 2009 and 2010. The keywords of “tilling aperiodicity” and “symmetry group of knot” occurred most from 2010 to 2013. Next, from 2013 to 2016, a large number of research topics emerged, such as “exact solution”, “framework”, “three-dimensional space”, “neural network”, “equational simulation”, “fluctuating asymmetry”, etc. For the next phase, the publication preferred to occur keywords like “operator”, “convolutional neural network”, and “support vector machine”. We can see that keywords continually change over time, and scholars expanded and deepened the research content on the journal.
Moreover, this paper also retrieves the papers published in 2020 and obtains 691 papers. Figure 10 shows the author-keywords co-occurrence network of these papers by setting the minimum number of occurrences of a keyword to two and displaying the closest network, which is related to 138 keywords. The side of the nodes denotes the frequency of co-occurrence. We can see that machine learning has the greatest frequency (24), followed by symmetry (20), deep learning (9), fixed point (9), asymmetry (8), dark matter (8), classification (7), dark energy (7), fuzzy logic (7), etc. The tenth to twentieth author-keywords are internet of things, particle swarm optimization, sustainability, conservation laws, convergence, hermite-hadamard inequality, stability analysis, ahp, artificial intelligence, bioconvection, and cloud computing.

6. Discussions

This journal explores symmetry phenomena related to mathematical, physics, interdisciplinary fields, etc. After the bibliometric analysis, we further discussed the possible reasons and given future suggestions. According to analyses of Symmetry, the basic characteristics, citation structures, and productive objects are summarized as follows:
(1) The most frequent type of publication is the article, occupying 94.11% of the publications. There were more high-quality papers published in 2020, 2017, and 2018, in the view of TC and H-index. The trend of the publication-year distribution increased from 2013 to 2019. As of June, 2020, the publications received the most citations (3324) in 2018. The publications in 2019 were cited 2234 times; this year not only had the greatest number of papers, but also ranks second place in terms of citation frequency, the reason for which may be that an increasing amount of scholars are paying attention to the journal.
(2) Since most of the top 15 cited publications are cooperative, communication plays a key role in improving the level of publications. From the cooperation network, China receives the largest number of cooperation and is at the core place; at the same time, it is the country with the greatest number of publications.
(3) Publications cover 100 countries/regions, and the most influential countries/regions are mainly from Asia and Europe. In terms of TP, TC, and H-index, China led, which shows that publications in Symmetry from China have higher influence, followed by the USA. From the top 10 most cited references/sources/authors: (a) the publications cite reference universally; (b) the cited sources are mostly in the field of physics and fuzzy mathematics; (c) the researchers can pay close attention to the papers of the top cited authors and sources.
(4) Combined with the strong citation burst analyses, we can find that the top 10 lists between Table 8 and Table 9 are different. This phenomenon explains that the author citation bursts at various times, and especially the emergence of some new authors, including Torra V. and Wang H. For the same authors, the ranks also exist discrepancy. The reason may be that the research topics of the journal are constantly enriched and there are diverse focuses, i.e., from physics to comprehensive discipline, including decision making, fuzzy mathematic, and deep learning.
(5) Considering the top 20 most frequent author-keywords and the top 20 keywords with the strongest citation bursts, in recent years, the main research contents of Symmetry focus on fuzzy set, aggregation operation, etc. The burst detection and the timeline view analyses of keywords show the knowledge structure and research trends in the journal. According to the results, the following topics can be considered in the future: (a) to process the complex and diverse raw data, and investigate new operators; (b) to study the symmetry phenomena in the artificial intelligence; (c) to excavate the symmetry nature in matching problems, aimed at solving more social management problems; (d) to predict the possible time change trends and their weights in dynamic issues; (e) to study the intelligent algorithms and promote their stability and reliability.
Due to the characteristics of publications, the most influential objects, and the co-occurrence analyses of author-keywords, regarding the publications from 2009 to 2019 in Symmetry, we find that, although the papers were first published in 2009, the numbers of publications have been increasing until the present. From 2015, the annual number of publications always exceeded 100. This suggests that the journal has constructed its influence on multidisciplinary theory and practice. Especially, authors from Asia and Europe pay more attention to this journal. In the future, it can expand its influence through cooperation. Then, the analyses results suggest that scholars should investigate advanced techniques (such as neural network, data mining, fuzzy decision-making, etc.) to keep pace with the times and solve the practical problems. Besides, with the uncertainty and diversification of the environment, enriching the research contents of the journal, at the same time, promoting the robustness of theory methods, etc. are also challenges for future scholars.

7. Conclusions

This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of Symmetry from 2009 to 2019 based on WoS. According to VOSviewer and CiteSpace, the analyses are conducted from the following aspects: basic characteristics, including the publications, citation number and citation structure; the influential objects; co-citation contributors and the burst detection analyses; the author-keywords co-occurrence analyses and timeline view analysis. The number of publications has almost increased every year since 2014. The year 2019 was the year with the largest volume of publications and 2018 was the year with the most citations. China is the most productive and influential country. The top three productive institutions are China Medical University Taiwan (China), National University of Defense Technology China (China), and Beijing Jiaotong University (China), respectively. The prominent author is Smarandache F. According to the results, cooperation among contributors also plays a key role in the publications. In the view of author-keyword analyses, the scopes of Symmetry are constantly enriching and no longer limited to the symmetry phenomena in the fields of physics and chemistry. At present, these include decision making, fuzzy mathematics, deep learning, machine learning and classification, etc. We also discuss possible reasons for this and future development.
In summary, this paper is a relatively comprehensive view of Symmetry by bibliometric analysis, which helps scholars understand its current status, future trends of development, and research scope. In future, we will continue to collect its productions and pay more attention to its developments, aiming to make the conclusions richer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.X.; data curation, J.A.; formal analysis, Z.T.; investigation, B.L.; methodology, Z.X.; project administration, Z.X.; supervision, E.K.Z; validation, E.K.Z.; writing—original draft, B.L.; writing—review and editing, J.A. and Z.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71771155.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Laengle, S.; Merigo, J.M.; Miranda, J.; Slowinski, R.; Bomze, I.; Borgonovo, E.; Dyson, R.G.; Oliveira, J.F.; Teunter, R. Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 262, 803–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Yu, D.J.; Xu, Z.S.; Saparauskas, J. The evolution of “Technological and Economic Development of Economy”: A bibliometric analysis. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2019, 25, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, D.J.; Xu, Z.S.; Pedrycz, W.; Wang, W.R. Information Sciences 1968–2016: A retrospective analysis with text mining and bibliometric. Inf. Sci. 2017, 418, 619–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, D.J.; Xu, Z.S.; Kao, Y.S.; Lin, C.T. The structure and citation landscape of IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (1994–2015). IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 26, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, W.; Xu, Z.S.; Zavadskas, E.K. A bibliometric overview of International Journal of Strategic Property Management between 2008 and 2019. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2019, 23, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, D.J.; Xu, Z.S.; Antucheviciene, J. Bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Civil Engineering and Management between 2008 and 2018. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2019, 25, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, W.; Xu, Z.S.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Laurinavičius, A. The knowledge domain of the Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering between 2006 and 2019. Balt. J. Road Bridge E. 2020, 15, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, W.S.; Liao, H.C. A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy decision research during 1970–2015. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hache, E.; Palle, A. Renewable energy source integration into power networks, research trends and policy implications: A bibliometric and research actors survey analysis. Energy Policy 2019, 124, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, D.J.; Xu, Z.S.; Wang, X.X. Bibliometric analysis of support vector machines research trend: A case study in China. Int. J. Mach. Learn Cybern. 2019, 11, 715–728. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stopar, K.; Bartol, T. Digital competences, computer skills and information literacy in secondary education: Mapping and visualization of trends and concepts. Scientometrics 2019, 118, 479–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van-Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L.R. VOSviewer: A computer program for bibliometric mapping. Soc. Sci. Electron Publ. 2009, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, C.M. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2006, 57, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, C.M.; Hu, Z.G.; Liu, S.B.; Tseng, H. Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2012, 12, 593–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, C.M. Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2017, 2, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Eck, N.J.V.; Waltman, L. Citnetexplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J. Inf. 2014, 8, 802–823. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu, Y.; Li, Z.; Arthur, D. Mapping publication status and exploring hotspots in a research field: Chronic disease self-management. J. Adv. Nurs. 2014, 70, 1837–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, F.K.; Shi, B.; Liu, R.X.; Zhou, W.K.; Shi, D.; Zhang, J.S. Theme trends and knowledge structure on choroidal neovascularization: A quantitative and co-word analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018, 18, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Qaiser, F.H.; Ahmed, K.; Sykora, M.; Choudhary, A.; Simpson, M. Decision support systems for sustainable logistics: A review and bibliometric analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tian, X.; Geng, Y.; Zhong, S.Z.; Wilson, J.; Gao, C.X.; Chen, W.; Yu, Z.J.; Hao, H. A bibliometric analysis on trends and characters of carbon emissions from transport sector. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2018, 59, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cobo, M.J.; Lopez-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative sudy among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 1382–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.X.; Xu, Z.S.; Share, M. A bibliometric analysis of Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja (2007–2019). Ekono. Istraz. 2020, 33, 865–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, Z.S.; Zhou, W.; Baltrenaite, E. Comprehensive bibliometric study of journal of environmental engineering and landscape management from 2007 to 2019. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. 2019, 27, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Pilkington, A.; Meredith, J. The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management-1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. J. Oper. Manag. 2009, 27, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hirsch, J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16569–16572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Graham, J.H.; Raz, S.; Hel-Or, H.; Nevo, E. Fluctuating asymmetry: Methods, theory, and applications. Symmetry 2010, 2, 466–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bamba, K.; Odintsov, S.D. Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories. Symmetry 2015, 7, 220–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Klingenberg, C.P. Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: Concepts, methods, and applications. Symmetry 2015, 7, 843–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kleinberg, J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2003, 7, 373–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ding, Y.; Gobinda, G.C.; Schubert, F. Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Inf. Process Manag. 2001, 37, 817–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Su, H.; Lee, P.C. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword cooccurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics 2010, 85, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Types of the Symmetry publications.
Figure 1. Types of the Symmetry publications.
Symmetry 12 01304 g001
Figure 2. The number of publications and citations distribution.
Figure 2. The number of publications and citations distribution.
Symmetry 12 01304 g002
Figure 3. The 11 countries/regions with greater than 100 publications.
Figure 3. The 11 countries/regions with greater than 100 publications.
Symmetry 12 01304 g003
Figure 4. The co-authorship network of countries/regions.
Figure 4. The co-authorship network of countries/regions.
Symmetry 12 01304 g004
Figure 5. The closest cooperation relationship among authors in Symmetry.
Figure 5. The closest cooperation relationship among authors in Symmetry.
Symmetry 12 01304 g005
Figure 6. The closest co-citation network of references in Symmetry.
Figure 6. The closest co-citation network of references in Symmetry.
Symmetry 12 01304 g006
Figure 7. The co-occurrence network of author-keywords.
Figure 7. The co-occurrence network of author-keywords.
Symmetry 12 01304 g007
Figure 8. The keywords clusters visualizations.
Figure 8. The keywords clusters visualizations.
Symmetry 12 01304 g008
Figure 9. The timeline view of keywords for publications.
Figure 9. The timeline view of keywords for publications.
Symmetry 12 01304 g009
Figure 10. Author-keywords co-occurrence network of publications in 2020.
Figure 10. Author-keywords co-occurrence network of publications in 2020.
Symmetry 12 01304 g010
Table 1. The subject areas of Symmetry.
Table 1. The subject areas of Symmetry.
FieldsSubject Areas
Physicsconservation laws, Noether’s theorem, spatial parity, charge parity, time parity, G-parity, standard model, internal symmetry, Lorentz symmetry, transformations, invariance, conservation, local and global symmetries, laws and symmetry, symmetry breaking, color symmetry, periodic and quasiperiodic crystals, time-reversal symmetry breaking, symmetry and complexity, Curie-Rosen symmetry principles, constants, biophysics, entropy, and indistinguishability
Chemistrycrystal and crystallography; chiral molecules, chiral resolution and asymmetric synthesis, asymmetric induction, chiral auxiliaries and chiral catalysts, stereochemistry, diastereomers, stereogenic, stereoisomers (enantiomers, atropisomers, diastereomers), stability, mixing, and phase separation
Biologysymmetry in biology, radial symmetry (tetramerism, pentamerism, etc.), diversity, preservation, sustainability, morphology, origin of life, and molecular evolution (homochirality)
Mathematicsinvariance, transformation, group theory, Lie groups, chirality, achiral or amphichiral, helix and Möbius strip, knot theory, graph theory, isometry, plane of symmetry, skewness, vertex algebra, asymmetry, dissymmetry, nonsymmetry and antisymmetry, supergroups and nonlinear algebraic structures, supersymmetry and supergravity, strings and branes, integrability and geometry, information theory, Felix Klein’s Erlangen Program, and continuous symmetry
Computer Science, Theory and Methodscomputer-aided design, computational geometry, computer graphics, visualization, image compression, data compression, pattern recognition, diversity, similarity, and conservation and sustainability
Table 2. Symmetry publication characteristics from 2009 to 2019.
Table 2. Symmetry publication characteristics from 2009 to 2019.
YearTP 1TCACH-Index≥100≥50≥20≥10≥5
2009151067600246
2010781388181828163548
20114039210120141420
2012332016701049
201313383400002
20145045799035924
20151149188132082041
20161587365140072050
20173231930620012157128
20187723324424033174210
201915292234115031037109
Total312511,724--420104274647
1 TP: total number of publications; TC: the total number of citations distribution; AC: the average number of citations per publication, the same below.
Table 3. Top 10 productive Institutions/Authors in Symmetry.
Table 3. Top 10 productive Institutions/Authors in Symmetry.
InstitutionTPAuthorTP
China Medical University Taiwan66Smarandache F.51
National University of Defense Technology China59Zhang X.H.31
Beijing Jiaotong University54Wang J.25
King Abdulaziz University52Kim J.24
University of New Mexico51Khan I.22
Harbin Engineering University47Chang C.C.19
Comsats University Islamabad Cui44Lee S.19
Ton Duc Thang University41Kim D.S.18
China Medical University Hospital Taiwan40Kim T.18
Central South University39Park J.H.17
Table 4. The top 15 most cited papers in Symmetry from 2009 to 2019.
Table 4. The top 15 most cited papers in Symmetry from 2009 to 2019.
TitleAuthor(s)TypeYearCitationIs it a High-Cited Paper
1Fluctuating asymmetry: methods, theory, and applicationsGraham et al.Review2010183
2Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theoriesBamba and OdintsovReview2015175
3Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applicationsKlingenberg and ChristianReview2015125
4Doubly-special relativity: facts, myths and some key open issuesGiovanniArticle2010114
5One-sign order parameter in iron based superconductorBorisenko et al.Article201290
6Behind the looking-glass: a review on human symmetry perceptionTrenderReview201090
7Organocatalytic enantioselective henry reactionsYolanda et al.Review201189
8A critical assessment of the performance of magnetic and electronic indices of aromaticitySola et al.Review201087
9On the harmonic oscillator model of electron delocalization (homed) index and its application to heteroatomic pi-electron systemsRaczynska et al.Article201084
10Models for green supplier selection with some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number Bonferroni mean operatorsWang et al.Article201881
11Spontaneous symmetry breaking and nambu-goldstone bosons in quantum many-body systemsBraunerReview201078
12Chiral liquid crystals: structures, phases, effectsDierkingReview201470
13Synthesis and reactions of dibenzo [a,e] pentalenesSaitoReview201065
14Methods for multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy dombi hamy mean operatorsLi et al.Article201864
15Chlorophylls, dymmetry, chirality, and photosynthesisSenge et al.Review201461
Table 5. The top 10 most influential countries/regions.
Table 5. The top 10 most influential countries/regions.
CountriesContinentTPTCACH-Index≥100≥50≥20≥10HC 1HP
1ChinaAsia122640023.2624053686100
2USANorth American34117185.041913169130
3PakistanAsia20711795.701702157472
4South KoreaAsia34010112.97150096110
5SpainEurope2178513.92111351810
6Saudi ArabiaAsia1777814.4113021125102
7UKEurope966997.28121471510
8JapanAsia1076696.25121351710
9ItalyEurope1186075.14131171600
10PolandEurope1095054.63110261410
1 HC: the number of the high-cited papers; HP: the number of the hot papers, the same below.
Table 6. The top 10 most influential institutions.
Table 6. The top 10 most influential institutions.
InstitutionsTPTCACH-Index≥100≥50≥20≥10HCHP
1Univ New Mexico514919.63110181610
2Sichuan Normal Univ936240.227037740
3Shaoxing Univ1826114.508015700
4Shaanxi Univ Sci & Technol302468.208003820
5Shanghai Maritime Univ272418.938004810
6China Med Univ672493.729002710
7Univ Manchester521743.404122410
8Berry Coll521042.003111210
9Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ1720712.188001710
10Tomsk State Pedag Univ1020620.603111210
Table 7. The top 10 most influential authors.
Table 7. The top 10 most influential authors.
AuthorsTPTCACH-Index≥100≥50≥20≥10HCHP
1Smarandache F.514899.59110181610
2Wei G.W.836245.257037740
3Wang J.1126624.185025530
4Ye J.1725915.248015700
5Zhang X.H.302468.208003820
6Graham J.H.320568.333111210
7Zavadskas E.K.1219416.178003710
8Hel-Or H.219195.502111110
9Nevo E.219195.502111110
10Raz S.219195.501111110
Table 8. The top 10 most cited references/sources/authors by publications in the journal.
Table 8. The top 10 most cited references/sources/authors by publications in the journal.
ReferenceTCSourceTCAuthorTC
1Zadeh La, 1965, Inform. Control203Phys. Rev. D. 2226Ye, J.H.336
2Atanassov K, 1986, Fuzzy Set Syst.148Symmetry-Basel1858Smarandache, F331
3Torra V, 2010, Int. J. Intell. Syst.49Phys. Rev. Lett. 1468Zadeh, La307
4Zadeh La, 1975, Inform. Sciences47Inform. Sciences951Liu, P.D.282
5Smarandache F., 1998, Neutrosophy Neutroso45Lect. Notes Comput. Sc. 867Wei, G.W.267
6Wang H., 2010, Multispace Multistru43Phys. Lett. B862Xu, Z.S.241
7Ye J, 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.42Fuzzy Set. Syst. 816Kim, T229
8Atanassov K, 1989, Fuzzy Set. Syst.38Expert Syst. Appl. 778Zhang, X.H.229
9Pawlak Z, 1982, Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci.35J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 735Atanassov, K.T.184
10Wang H., 2005, Interval Neutrosophi31Phys. Rev. A728Kostelecky, V.A.176
Table 9. Top 10 cited authors with the strongest citation bursts.
Table 9. Top 10 cited authors with the strongest citation bursts.
Cited AuthorsYearStrengthBeginEnd2009–2019
1Zadeh La200917.96520182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
2Atanassov K.T.200912.43520182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
3Smarandache F.200912.193120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
4Zhang X.H. 200911.766120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
5Ye. J.200911.267120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
6Xu Z. S. 200910.363220182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
7Torra V. 20099.711320182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
8Chen S.M.20099.711320182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
9Wang H.20099.566120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
10Wang J.Q.20099.301720182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
Table 10. Top 15 cited journals with the strongest citation bursts.
Table 10. Top 15 cited journals with the strongest citation bursts.
Cited journalsYearStrengthBeginEnd2009–2019
1Inform. Control. 200939.130220172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
2Knowl-Based Syst200937.167120172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
3IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst. 200932.277420172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
4J. Math Phys. 200930.042820092016▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂
5Soft Comput. 200930.004120172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
6Int. J. Intell. Syst. 200927.982420182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
7Int. J. Mach. Learn Cyb. 200926.215120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
8J. Phys. A-math Gen. 200924.906720092016▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂
9IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 200923.340820142019▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃
10Rev. Mod. Phys. 200920.810920092016▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂
11Science200920.059720102016▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂
12Phys. Lett. B200919.024320102016▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂
13Phys. Lett A200918.767320092016▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂
14J. Phys. A-math Theor. 200918.311320142016▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂
15Phys. Rev. B200917.236520092016▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂
Table 11. The top 20 most frequent author-keywords in Symmetry.
Table 11. The top 20 most frequent author-keywords in Symmetry.
RankAuthor-KeywordFrequencyRankAuthor-KeywordFrequency
1symmetry9211chirality18
2decision making3712big data17
3deep learning3013convolutional neural network17
4fixed point2914fluctuating asymmetry17
5machine learning2715cloud computing16
6internet of things2216image processing16
7symmetry breaking2017clustering15
8neural network1918aggregation operator14
9neutrosophic set1919classification14
10supersymmetry1920data mining14
Table 12. The top 20 keywords with the strongest citation bursts.
Table 12. The top 20 keywords with the strongest citation bursts.
KeywordsYearStrengthBeginEnd2009–2019
1fuzzy set200918.308220172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
2aggregation operator200911.062720182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
3number200910.620320182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
4symmetry20099.864720092014▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂
5similarity measure20099.272920182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
6information20098.927320172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
7decision making20098.795920172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
8operator20098.377820182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
9environment20096.595320182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
10symmetry breaking20096.350320102010▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
11TOPSIS20095.707920182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
12network20095.657220172019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
13neutrosophic set20095.265120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
14deep learning20095.265120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
15management20095.265120182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃
16evolution20095.057820152016▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂
17intuitionistic-fuzzy20095.030820172017▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
18group-decision-making20095.030820172017▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
19attribute-decision-making20095.030820172017▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
20scheme20094.936420182019▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, B.; Xu, Z.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Antuchevičienė, J.; Turskis, Z. A Bibliometric Analysis of Symmetry (2009–2019). Symmetry 2020, 12, 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12081304

AMA Style

Li B, Xu Z, Zavadskas EK, Antuchevičienė J, Turskis Z. A Bibliometric Analysis of Symmetry (2009–2019). Symmetry. 2020; 12(8):1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12081304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Bo, Zeshui Xu, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Jurgita Antuchevičienė, and Zenonas Turskis. 2020. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Symmetry (2009–2019)" Symmetry 12, no. 8: 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12081304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop