Next Article in Journal
The Cauchy Problem for the Generalized Hyperbolic Novikov–Veselov Equation via the Moutard Symmetries
Previous Article in Journal
Recurrent Sequences Play for Survival Probability of Discrete Time Risk Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relationship of Symmetry, Complexity, and Shape in Mobile Interface Aesthetics, from an Emotional Perspective—A Case Study of the Smartwatch
 
 
Article

Preferring and Detecting Face Symmetry: Comparing Children and Adults Judging Human and Monkey Faces

1
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath FK9 4LA, UK
2
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2020, 12(12), 2112; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122112
Received: 14 October 2020 / Revised: 27 November 2020 / Accepted: 9 December 2020 / Published: 19 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Empirical Aesthetics)
Background: Visual symmetry is often found attractive. Symmetry may be preferred either due to a bias in the visual system or due to evolutionary selection pressures related to partner preference. Simple perceptual bias views predict that symmetry preferences should be similar across types of stimuli and unlikely to be related to factors such as age. Methods: The current study examined preferences for symmetry across age groups (pre-puberty vs post-puberty) and stimuli type (human face vs monkey face). Pairs of images manipulated for symmetry were presented and participants asked to choose the image they preferred. Participants repeated the task and were asked to detect symmetry. Results: Both age of observer and stimuli type were associated with symmetry preferences. Older observers had higher preferences for symmetry but preferred it most in human vs monkey stimuli. Across both age groups, symmetry preferences and detection abilities were weakly related. Conclusions: The study supports some ideas from an evolutionary advantage view of symmetry preference, whereby symmetry is expected be higher for potential partners (here human faces) and higher post-puberty when partner choice becomes more relevant. Such potentially motivational based preferences challenge perceptual bias explanations as a sole explanation for symmetry preferences but may occur alongside them. View Full-Text
Keywords: symmetry; asymmetry; face preference; detection; development symmetry; asymmetry; face preference; detection; development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Little, A.C.; Griffey, J.A.F. Preferring and Detecting Face Symmetry: Comparing Children and Adults Judging Human and Monkey Faces. Symmetry 2020, 12, 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122112

AMA Style

Little AC, Griffey JAF. Preferring and Detecting Face Symmetry: Comparing Children and Adults Judging Human and Monkey Faces. Symmetry. 2020; 12(12):2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Little, Anthony C., and Jack A. F. Griffey. 2020. "Preferring and Detecting Face Symmetry: Comparing Children and Adults Judging Human and Monkey Faces" Symmetry 12, no. 12: 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122112

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop